Higgs to PhotonsBeyond the Standard
Model
G.CacciapagliaIPN, Lyon
ULB, 27 feb. 2009
G.C.,A.Deandrea,J.Llodra-Perez 0901.0927
An old friend: the Higgs Boson
• The Higgs Boson is the most valuable game at the LHC
• New Physics motivated by the radiative instability of the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism
• If we detect New Physics, how can we test if it has anything to do with the Higgs?
• Higgs properties
102
103
104
105
100 200 300 400 500
qq ! Wh
qq ! Zh
gg ! h
bb ! h
qb ! qth
gg,qq ! tth
qq ! qqh
mh [GeV]
! [fb]
SM Higgs production
LHC
TeV4LHC Higgs working group
The main production channelis via gluon fusion (loop induced!)
Followed by Vector Boson Fusion.
• H to photons and gluons couplings are loop induced
• sensitive to massive particles that play a role in the EWSB (top and W)
• most sensitive to New Physics (in the EWSB sector)!
• what can we learn from measuring them?
Definitions:
!x =m2
H
4m2x
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) +"
fermions
Nc,fQ2fAF (#f ) +
"
NP
Nc,NP Q2NP ANP (#NP )
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!!!12
"
quarks
AF (#f ) +"
NP
C(rNP )ANP (#NP )
!!!!!!
2
AF (0) =43
, AW (0) = !7 , AS(0) =13
.
Non decoupling because the Higgs couplingsare proportional to the mass!
ANP =v
mNP
!mNP
!vAF,W,SFor New Physics loops:
A(!)" 0
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
!!! =!
NP
34Nc,NP Q2
NPv
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
!gg =!
NP
2C(rNP )v
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
where
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
!!! =!
NP
34Nc,NP Q2
NPv
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
!gg =!
NP
2C(rNP )v
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
where
ANP
At=
!"
#
1 for fermions! 21
4 for vectors14 for scalars
For heavy new physics:
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
!!! =!
NP
34Nc,NP Q2
NPv
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
!gg =!
NP
2C(rNP )v
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
where
v
mNP
!mNP
!v! v2
m2NP
Decoupling:
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
!!! =!
NP
34Nc,NP Q2
NPv
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
!gg =!
NP
2C(rNP )v
mNP
"mNP
"v
AF,W,S(mNP )At
where
Given the spectrum as a function of he Higgs VEV,the contribution can be easily calculated!
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
Anomalous W and top to Higgs couplings can also becast in the kappa parameters:
!!!(top) = !gg(top) =v
mt
"mt
"v! 1
!!!(W ) =34
!v
mW
"mW
"v! 1
"AW (#W )AF (#top)
!gg(W ) = 0
Top:
W:
Formalism easily extendable to non-minimal Higgs sectors!
Simple parameterization:
!!! =GF !2m3
H
128!
2"3
!!!!!AW (#W ) + 3"
23
#2
At(#t) [1 + $!! ] + . . .
!!!!!
2
!gg =GF !2
sm3H
16!
2"3
!!!!12At(#t) [1 + $gg] + . . .
!!!!2
Normalizing with the top contribution has many advantages:
New physics likely to be linked to top physics;
for a top partner ;
same sign for a single new particle;
positive kappas reduce photon and enhance gluon widths.
!!! = !gg
Now, we can write observables in terms of those parameters:
!̄(H) =
!!NP
gg + !SMV BF + !SM
V H,t̄tH
!SMgg + !SM
V BF + !SMV H,t̄tH
"!
!(1 + "gg)2!SM
gg + !SMV BF + !SM
V H,t̄tH
!SMgg + !SM
V BF + !SMV H,t̄tH
"
The total Higgs production cross section (normalized with the SM one) is
Corrections to the bottom Yukawa will invalidate our analysis (see SUSY)
Marginal effects from the W couplings: VBF or total width
Possible to extend the analysis with more parameters!
Note that we neglected corrections to the couplings of the Higgs:especially to the bottom and W!
Now, we can write observables in terms of those parameters:
The photon Branching Ratio (normalized with the SM one) is
Corrections to the bottom Yukawa will invalidate our analysis (see SUSY)
Marginal effects from the W couplings: VBF or total width
Possible to extend the analysis with more parameters!
Note that we neglected corrections to the couplings of the Higgs:especially to the bottom and W!
BR(H ! !!) =!NP
!!
!SM!!
!SMtot
!NPgg + !NP
!! + !SMothers
!!
1 +!!!
916AW ("W ) + 1
"2 !SMtot
(1 + !gg)2!SMgg + (!SM
tot " !SMgg )
Example 1:4th generation.
Add a full chiral 4th generation:190 GeV < mQ < 2 TeV100 GeV < mL < 2 TeV
The gluon loop counts number of color triplets:
The photon loop depends on charges:
All in all, like two tops!
!gg = 2
!!! =34
!3
"23
#2
+ 3"!1
3
#2
+ 1
$= 2
Example 2:models of flavour in extra dimension
gauge bosons
light fermions
top
KK modes
Higgs
Fermion mass hierarchy generated by exponential localization:Order(1) masses in the bulk, Order(1) Yukawas on the brane!
Do the light fermion KK modes contribute?
Gauge boson (W): negligible!
!!5W+
µ (y1) = 0!5W+
µ (y2) + g25V 2
4 W+µ (y2) = 0
W+(y, x) =!
n
fn(mny) Wn(x)+ mnf !(mny2)f(mny2)
+g25V 2
4= 0
Spectrum fixed by the Boundary Conditions:
The function f is determined by the geometry.
Gauge boson (W): negligible!
!!5W+
µ (y1) = 0!5W+
µ (y2) + g25V 2
4 W+µ (y2) = 0
W+(y, x) =!
n
fn(mny) Wn(x)+ mnf !(mny2)f(mny2)
+g25V 2
4= 0
Spectrum fixed by the Boundary Conditions:
Total derivate in V;solve in V as a function of mn:
v
mn
!mn
!v=
2 f !
f
f !
f + mny2
!f !!
f !"
f !
f
#2$
Gauge boson (W): negligible!
Numerically, we found that,both in flat and warped XD:
!!
n=0
v
mn
!mn
!v= 1
Probably because Higgs couples to boundary field with standard couplings:neglecting masses, we expect no correction.
=!
1! v
mW
!mW
!v
"(AW ("W )!AW (0)) " 0
!!! !!
1" v
mW
"mW
"v
"AW (#W ) +
!#
n=1
v
mn
"mn
"vAW (0) =
Fermions: it depends...Gauge-Higgs unification in flat space:
same bulk mass for left and right-handed fields ML = MR = M
ml ! 2M̃!" e!2!M̃L β contains VEV and Yukawa
Fermions: it depends...Gauge-Higgs unification in flat space:
same bulk mass for left and right-handed fields ML = MR = M
ml ! 2M̃!" e!2!M̃L
m2nL2 = M̃2L2 + n2 ± 2n2
!n2 + M̃2L2
! +n4 + 3M̃2L2n2
(n2 + M̃2L2)2!2 +O(!3)
!
n
!
mn
"mn
"!= !2!2
"!n=1
n4"3M̃2L2n2
(n2+M̃2L2)2=
! !2"2
sinh2 !M̃L
#!M̃L
tanh !M̃L! 1
$" ! m2
l
2M̃2
%#M̃L
tanh#M̃L! 1
&.
β contains VEV and Yukawa
KK masses (n>1):
Contribution proportional to the sum:
Fermions: it depends...Different bulk masses:
case ML = - MR = M
ml ! 2M̃!" e!2!M̃L β contains VEV and Yukawa
KK masses (n>1):
Contribution proportional to the sum:
m2nL2 = M̃2L2 + n2 ± 2n2
!n2 + M̃2L2
! +(1! 2"M̃L)n4 + (3! 2"M̃L)M̃2L2n2
(n2 + M̃2L2)2!2 +O(!3)
!
n
!
mn
"mn
"!= !2!2
!!
n=1
(1 + 2#M̃L)n4 ! (3! 2#M̃L)M̃2L2n2
(n2 + M̃2L2)2=
! #2!2
4 sinh3 #M̃L
"cosh(3#M̃L) + (4#M̃L! 1) cosh(#M̃L)! 4(#M̃L + 1) sinh(#M̃L)
#
" !#2!2 # !0.075$
2TeVmKK
%2 $mf
mtop
%2
.
Fermions: it depends...
For ML ≠ MR, all fermions contribute
!
n
!
mn
"mn
"!! "#2!2
!!! = !gg ! 6(""2#2) # "0.45!
2TeVmKK
"2
(we numerically checked it for generic masses)
Fermions: it depends...
The same happens in warped case, however:
each KK mode decouples from the Higgs for ML = MR: it depends on the wave functions being approx. proportional.
The result does not depend on the specific localization pattern e/o flavour structure!
It only depends on the overall KK mass...
fourth generation;
supersymmetry in the MSSM golden region: stops;
Simplest Little Higgs (mW ! = 2 TeV);
Littlest Higgs (T-parity: f = 500 GeV, without T parity f = 5 TeV);
colour octet model;
Lee-Wick Standard Model (LW Higgs mass at 1 TeV);
Universal Extra Dimension model (mKK = 500 GeV);
model of Gauge Higgs unification in flat space (first W resonance at 2TeV);
the Minimal Composite Higgs (Gauge Higgs unification in warped space)with the IR brane at 1/R! = 1 TeV;
a flat (W ! at 2 TeV) and
warped (1/R! at 1 TeV) version of brane Higgs models with flavour.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
•
!
!
!
Our survey of models:
!!""!!
##
$$ %%
&&
"" 0.51.5
0.5
1.5
##
!!
A
B
$$
%0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
%0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
k&&
kgg
!!""
!!$$
%%
0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
1.05 0.95
!!
B
A
%0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
%0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
k&&
kgg
mH = 120 @ LHC
4 gen Susy SLH LH LeeWick Octet
UED flat GH Warped GH flat and warped flavour
! ! ! !!! ! • ! !
!A - inclusive γγB - VBF γγ
!!""!!
##
$$ %%
&&
"" 0.51.5
0.5
1.5
##
!!
A
B
$$
%0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
%0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
k&&
kgg
!!""
!!$$
%%
0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
1.05 0.95
!!
B
A
%0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
%0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
k&&
kgg
mH = 120 @ LHC
4 gen Susy SLH LH LeeWick Octet
UED flat GH Warped GH flat and warped flavour
! ! ! !!! ! • ! !
!A - inclusive γγB - VBF γγ
!!""!!
##
$$ %%
&&
"" 0.51.5
0.5
1.5
##
!!
A
B
$$
%0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
%0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
k&&
kgg
!!""
!!$$
%%
0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
1.05 0.95
!!
B
A
%0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
%0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
k&&
kgg
mH = 120 @ LHC
4 gen Susy SLH LH LeeWick Octet
UED flat GH Warped GH flat and warped flavour
! ! ! !!! ! • ! !
!A - inclusive γγB - VBF γγ
mH = 150 @ LHC
4 gen Susy SLH LH LeeWick Octet
UED flat GH Warped GH flat and warped flavour
! ! ! !!! ! • ! !
!A - inclusive γγB - WW & ZZ
!!""
##
$$ %%
&&!!
0.5
2
1.5
0.5
1.5""
!!
A
B
##
$0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
$0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
k%%
kgg
!!""$$
%%
0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
!!B
A
$0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
$0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
k%%kgg
mH = 120 @ ILC
4 gen Susy SLH LH LeeWick Octet
UED flat GH Warped GH flat and warped flavour
! ! ! !!! ! • ! !
!A - photon BRB - gluon BR
!!""!!
##
$$%%
&&""
0.5
2
1.5
0.51.5
##
!!
A
B
$$
%0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
%0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
k&&
kgg
!!""
!!$$
%%0.90
0.95
1.05
1.10
1.05 0.95
!!
A
B
%0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
%0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
k&&kgg
Conclusions
• H → γγ and g g → H are very sensitive to New Physics in the EWSB sector.
• A simple mod-ind parameterization allows easy calculation and exp. analysis.
• Many models give robust predictions, and point in a specific direction of the par. space: discrimination
• Probe new particles not directly accessible.
• Further study in collab. with experimentalists!