Page 1
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Page 1
High Fidelity!Corporate Theft and Recovery
Geoff Harrold, The Gavilon GroupAlex Lathrop, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
Page 2
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Page 2
Section I
Introduction
Page 3
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Employee Crime Statistics• $50B stolen by employees of US businesses (2013)
An increase of 7% from 2011
• 75% of employees have stolen at least once from their employer• 5% of annual revenues are lost to theft or fraud• Theft is conducted by:
Men: 59.1% of the timeWomen: 40.9% of the time
Page 4
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Page 5
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Employee Crime Statistics
• Employee theft occurs most often at: Convenience storesTruck stopsApparel storesOffice supply/stationery stores
• Small businesses also are prone to employee theft as internal controls are not as established
Page 6
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Employee Theft Schemes
• As the usage of cash decreases, employees have shifted to stealing material/physical items (inventory)• Corporate credit cards make it easier for employees to
disguise charging personal expenses to the company• Employees often falsify time records and number of
hours worked in order to be paid more by the company
Page 7
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Detecting Employee Theft
• Tips are the most common method of initial detection• Top three sources of tips
Employee tips (51%)Customer tips (22%)Anonymous tips (12.4%)
• Organizations that use a hotline experience a 44.4% lower median fraud loss
Page 8
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Take Away
• Employee theft presents a substantial loss exposure to most companies
• Risk Managers must have effective loss control measures in place and be sure the Company is adequately insured
Page 9
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Page 9
Section II
The Case of the Stolen Grain
Page 10
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Background• Gavilon
Managing Essential Ag Commodities on a Global basisSecond largest grain handler based on licensed storage
• The Case Study locationStorage capacity of 7.5M tons of grainTrucks enter the facility, weigh in empty, truck is filled with
grain, weigh out full, and departo Entire process takes about 12 minutes per truck
Page 11
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
The Case Study Facility
Page 12
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Discovery of the Loss
• First Evidence of the LossTip from customer
• Confirming the LossConducted Internal Audit of InventoryConfirmed missing stock
Page 13
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Investigating the Loss• Hired third-party surveillance company
Observed trucking operations for several nightsDuring certain periods, trucks would enter and exit with
full loads in less than four minutes
• Local Law Enforcement Interviewed night crewThefts took place when one employee went on breaks
o Remaining employee was colluding with truck drivers
Page 14
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Insurance Issues – Employee Requirement
• Must be an employee
• Insuring AgreementLoss must result from dishonest or fraudulent acts
“committed by an Employee acting alone or in collusion with others”
• Had to show that truck drivers were in collusion with storage facility employee
Page 15
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Insurance Issues – Inventory Computation Exclusion
• Missing inventory cannot be the sole evidence of the loss
• Evidence of loss included customer tip and surveillance
Inventory audit confirmed the quantity of the loss
Page 16
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Quantifying the Loss• Bulk Commodities
Challenge of bulk commoditiesPhysical Dimensions
o Size – Angle of Repose - Expertise
o Weight of Product
o The Storage Barn is Seldom Empty
• Accounting recordsScale Tickets Invoices
Page 17
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Quantifying the Loss• Accounting records
Historical throughput o Seasonal adjustments
Historical pricingo Traded on an exchange?
o Independent Verification
o Profit Margin
o Accounting systems
Page 18
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Insurance Issues – Proof of Loss• Describe all facts establishing that loss occurred, nature of
the theft, that employees participatedInterviews/testimony of employee in underlying matter may
include denials inherently in tension with coverage claim
• Provide an accounting of the loss—quantum, dollar value• Statement must be sworn• Deadline is condition precedent to coverage—but insurer
will grant extension on reasonable request• Important to involve professional support immediately
Page 19
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Insurance Issues – Documenting the Loss
• Forensic Investigation
• Interviews
• Law Enforcement and Prosecutorial Authorities
• Outside Evidence
Page 20
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Lessons Learned• An ounce of prevention
Frequent and unscheduled auditso Use of a third party for unscheduled audits
Rotate employees and shifts worked Manager present during all shifts Criminal Background Checks Engage a Forensic Accountant before a loss
o Endorse Crime Policy to include fees
Think like a criminal Contemplate the records and documents needed before a loss
Page 21
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Preventing a Loss• Physical Deterrents
Fencing, lighting, gates CCTV and Security Cameras Security Staff Restrict Access Vulnerability Assessment
• Metaphysical Deterrents Local Authorities – Fire and Law Enforcement Be a good neighbor
Page 22
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Page 22
Section III
Coverage for Employee Theft
Page 23
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Fidelity Bond Components
• Insuring AgreementEmployee Involvement“Manifest Intent”To Gain and/or Cause Loss
• Exclusions
• Conditions
Page 24
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Insuring Agreement
We will pay for loss resulting directly from dishonest or fraudulent acts . . . committed by an Employee acting alone or in collusion with others . . . with the manifest [or specific] intent to:
1) Cause you to sustain such loss; [and/or]2) Obtain an improper financial benefit for the
Employee or another person or entity.
Page 25
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Manifest Intent• Must be discernible intention (objective/subjective)• to cause Loss to Company and/or benefit to employee
or others• Does not include Employee Compensation (per
insuring agreement or by exclusion)• Loss must be direct result of employee acts
Page 26
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Some Common Exclusions• Inventory computation exclusion• Timing of loss and claim• Directors and officers • “Damages” or indirect or consequential losses• Losses resulting exclusively from acts of non-
employees
Page 27
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Limitations on Recovery
• Timing related limitations
• Variable limits/sublimits related to type of loss
• Non-cumulation provisions
Page 28
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Tendering and Supporting Your Claim• Deadlines
Policies are “claims made and reported”Provide prompt notice of claimProvide proof of loss
• Engage forensic accountant, investigator and/or counsel, if required, early!
Page 29
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Litigation Considerations• Documentation of claim (causation, participants,
quantum of loss) must be well developed• Supporting experts lined up• Witnesses lined up/credible• Anticipate and prepare responses to insurer coverage
arguments• What is the cost-benefit analysis for litigation?• Would compromise make sense?
Page 30
Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited.
Negotiated Settlements
• Insurers may dispute coverage because they do not agree with proof that (1) an employee was involved; (2) there was manifest intent; (3) that proof was consistent with conditions and exclusions; or (4) quantum of loss was proved• Such disputes often can be compromised in a direct meeting
with the insurer• Be prepared to (1) lay out the factual case for coverage;
(2) demonstrate quantum; (3) address legal issues head-on; and (4) compromise weaker points• Involve your forensic accountant, investigators, and counsel