+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Higher Speed Fiber Transceiver & Cable Plant Roadmap · PDF fileand longer reach channels ......

Higher Speed Fiber Transceiver & Cable Plant Roadmap · PDF fileand longer reach channels ......

Date post: 31-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: builien
View: 216 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
65
4/25/2016 Higher Speed Fiber Transceiver & Cable Plant Roadmap Robert Reid Sr. Product Development Manager Fiber Product Group Panduit Corp. DISCLAIMER: TIA does not endorse or promote any product, service, company or provider
Transcript

4/25/2016

Higher Speed Fiber Transceiver & Cable Plant Roadmap

Robert ReidSr. Product Development ManagerFiber Product GroupPanduit Corp.

DISCLAIMER: TIA does not endorse or promote any product, service, company or provider

Agenda

Introduction

Transceiver Historical Perspective

Going Forward - Higher Speed Roadmap

Cable Plant Implications

Planning and Best Practices

Summary

Q & A

Introduction

• Newer network designs (e.g., Flat Networks) require more transmission media to enable scalable and higher density solutions

• Large Enterprise/Webscale DCs are challenged to deal with significant transitions in the market to higher speed and longer reach channels

• Seamless infrastructure migration plans are necessary as data center port speeds are increasing (10Gb to 40Gb to 100Gb/s)(16Gb to 32Gb to 128Gb/s)

New Global Market Conditions/Challenges

• Data center size continues to grow– Mega Data Centers will drive growth in market

• MMF/VCSEL solution will continue seeing pressure from competing SMF/Long wavelength laser solutions

• VCSEL/MMF solutions offer several advantages worth preserving– Lowest energy consumption– Dust/debris immunity at connections (robust operation, MACs)– Support break-out via parallel optics (vs. WDM breakout)– Large installed base (>80% of DC fiber media)

• Benefits preserved for the bulk of 100G/128GFC/400G/512G channels by supporting 100m reach (even in break-out implementations)– using 4x parallel solutions

New Global Market Conditions/Challenges

DC Market & Customer Requirements Need REACH !!!!

Fiber HD Distribution - Market Segmentation SuperNAP Las Vegas

Google Mayes County

Relative cost of 40G LR4 compared to SR4

ANSI FC Higher Speed EffortsMarket Data

• Mainstream/High Volume use of 16G HBAs & Targets with 16GFC

• Marriage of 16GFC capability with SSDs• Launch of Cisco MDS 97K Multilayer Directors• Less FC Edge switches being sold - More

Directors

• Support of Installed Base: Support for 16GFC, 32GFC, 40GbE, 100GbE, 128GFC and beyond on the existing installed MMF fiber plant

• Shortwave WDM (SWDM): The ability to multiplex multiple lanes onto a single fiber to reduce the fiber count and enable duplex-LC interfaces for 40GbE, 32GFC,100GbE, 128GFC and beyond

• Lane rates > 25 Gb/s: Developing and standardizing technology that enables multimode VCSELs to operate at 50 Gb/s and beyond, to enable future generations of both single-lane and multiple lane optical interfaces

• Wideband MMF: Support for the definition and standardization of wideband multimode fiber to enable WDM transmission over links that are greater than 300m

DC Market & Customer Requirements Transceiver OEM Macro Trends

Transceiver Historical Perspective

Functional Outline of a Transceiver (SFP)

Standards that control transceiver form-factors

A multi-source agreement (MSA) is an agreement between multiple manufacturers to make products which are compatible across vendors, acting as de facto standards, establishing a competitive market for interoperable products.

What is Defined by the MSA?

The major elements or characteristics defined in the MSAs are:

Mechanical Interface • Mechanical dimensions of the device• Transceiver edge connector to host PCB-mounted electrical connector mating• Host board mechanical layout (location/size of solder pads, etc.)• Insertion, Extraction and Retention forces• Labeling• Bezel design considerations for host systems• Electrical connector mechanical aspects• Cage assembly dimensions (hollow cage mounted in host system)

Electrical Interface • Pin definitions• Timing requirements and Status I/O• Module definition interface and data field description

Fiber Channel Transceiver

Data sheet for commercial 8G serial PMD with SFP+ form factor

Typical modular transceiver used for SAN switch ports

Supports 8G, 4G & 2G

QSFP Parallel Optics Modular Transceiver Form-Factor

• MSA for MM short wave 40Gb/s Ethernet (4 x 10 lanes of 10G) and/or 100Gb/s Ethernet (4 lanes of 25G)

CFP MSA

Railing System (host) With CFP MSA module inserted

Hot-pluggable optical transceiver form factor for high speed applications, including next-generation Ethernet (40GBASE-SR4, 100GBASE-SR10, 40GBASE-LR4, 40GBASE-LR & 100GBASE-LR4)

Profile allows access for 4 SFP+ or 2 QSFP modules

Low Cost

High VolumeTooling Intensive

High Cost

Low Risk DesignsLow Volume

Historical map of transceiver speeds/applications10G Ethernet Serial Transceiver Historical Migration

Low Cost

High VolumeTooling Intensive

High Cost

Low Risk DesignsLow Volume

Historical map of transceiver speeds/applications100G Transceiver Migration

CFP

CFP2

QSFP28CXP

Driver VCSEL

DriverTX Lane 0TX Lane 1TX Lane 2TX Lane 3

NC

VCSEL

MPO12

Driver VCSELDriver VCSEL

NCRX Lane 0RX Lane 1RX Lane 2RX Lane 3 TIA PIN

TIA PINTIA PINTIA PIN

NCNC

MMF 40G 850nm TxRx ArchitectureProposed 40G MM Transceiver - 40GBASE-SR4

• “Extended Reach” transceivers now available– Cisco/Dell

• Operates as 4 x 10G– QSFP+ has 2.5X edge-density for 10GBASE-S

• Operates as 1 x 40G– 300m (OM3) or 400m (OM4) vs. 100m/150m for Std SR4 device

• Lower cost alternative to SM (40GBASE-LR4 QSFP+)– Lower CAPEX – Estimated 75%– Lower OPEX – 50% of power dissipation (1.5W vs. 3.5W)

40GBASE-eSR4 QSFP+Emerging ‘Defacto’ Standard

TIA PINTIA PINTIA PIN

TIA PINTIA PINTIA PIN

Driver VCSEL

DriverNC

TX Lane 0TX Lane 1TX Lane 2TX Lane 3TX Lane 4TX Lane 5TX Lane 6TX Lane 7TX Lane 8TX Lane 9

NC

VCSEL

MPO24

Driver VCSELDriver VCSEL

NCRX Lane 0RX Lane 1RX Lane 2RX Lane 3RX Lane 4RX Lane 5RX Lane 6RX Lane 7RX Lane 8RX Lane 9

NC

TIA PIN

TIA PINTIA PINTIA PIN

Driver VCSEL

Driver VCSELDriver VCSELDriver VCSELDriver VCSEL

Driver VCSELDriver VCSELDriver VCSEL

Driver VCSELDriver VCSEL

MMF 100G 850nm TxRx ArchitectureProposed 100G MM Transceiver - 100GBASE-SR10

Driver VCSEL

DriverTX Lane 0TX Lane 1TX Lane 2TX Lane 3

NC

VCSEL

MPO12

Driver VCSELDriver VCSEL

NCRX Lane 0RX Lane 1RX Lane 2RX Lane 3 TIA PIN

TIA PINTIA PINTIA PIN

NCNC

MMF 100G 850nm TxRx ArchitectureProposed 40G MM Transceiver - 40GBASE-SR4

SMF 4 x 10Gb/s TxRx Front-endProposed 40G SM Transceiver - 40GBASE-LR4

1x4deMUX

4 x 10GWDM ROSAw/ TIA/AGC

&CDR

RX Lane 3

RX Lane 2

RX Lane 1

RX Lane 0

LC Conn.

1x4MUX

LaserDrivers

&4 x 10G

WDM TOSA

TX Lane 3

TX Lane 2

TX Lane 1

TX Lane 0

LC Conn.

4 x 10Gb/sWDM

SMF 4 x 25Gb/s TxRx Front-end SM Transceiver - 100GBASE-LR4

1x4deMUX

4 x 25GWDM ROSAw/TIA/AGC

&CDR

RX Lane 3

RX Lane 2

RX Lane 1

RX Lane 0

LC Conn.

1x4MUX

LaserDrivers

&4 x 25G

WDM TOSA

TX Lane 3

TX Lane 2

TX Lane 1

TX Lane 0

LC Conn.

4 x 25Gb/sWDM

Going ForwardHigher Speed Roadmap

From http://www.ethernetalliance.org/roadmap/

Ethernet Roadmap

SM

Fiber Channel Roadmap

From http://www.ethernetalliance.org/roadmap/

Ethernet Roadmap(beyond 100G)

Ethernet Roadmap(beyond 16G)

Technology and Standards UpdatesFiber Media Devices

802.3 Media Device Interface (MDI)

Application 10GBASE-SR

25GBASE-SR

40GBASE-SR4

100GBASE-SR10

100GBASE-SR4**

Data Rate 10 Gbps 25 Gbps 40 Gbps 100 Gbps 100 Gbps

IEEE Std 802.3ae TBD 802.3ba 802.3ba 802.3bm

Form Factor SFP+ TBD QSFP+ CFP, CXP QSFP28, CFP4

Fiber Type OM3/4 OM3/4 OM3/4 OM3/4 OM3/4

Reach* 300/400m 70/100m? 100/150m 100/150m 70/100m

# of Fibers 2 2 12 (8 used) 24 (20 used) 12 (8 used)

Connectors

Duplex LC Duplex LC 12f MPO 24f MPO (2 x 12) 12f MPO

Schematic

*1.5 dB Link Budget **IEEE P802.3bm approved May 10, 2015

Technology and Standards UpdatesIEEE 802.3bs - Optical Proposals for 400GbE

Technology and Standards UpdatesEnabling Technology - PAM-4 Multilevel Encoding

• 4 distinct pulse amplitudes used• Amplitude represented by two bits 00,

01, 11, and 10 (a ‘symbol’)• One of the four amplitudes is transmitted

in a symbol period, there are two bits transmitted in parallel (data rate doubled)

• PAM-4 modulation is twice as bandwidth-efficient as binary modulation

100G SR4 Enabler

Extension of VCSEL emitter done in support of 16Gb/s Fiber Channel short wave transceivers (Finisar work in early 2008)

Several companies have research focused on direct modulation of VCSEL devices to support the serial short wave channel (Avago, Merge Optics, VIS, NEC, etc.)

Direct impact direction of future 100G MM implementations (4x25G instead of 10x10G)

Technology and Standards UpdatesEnabling Technology - VCSEL Technology

TIA TR-42.11 Optical Fiber SystemsNew Project: Wide Band Multimode (WBMMF)

• Support 4 or more wavelengths• Possibly transmit 40G or 100G over a pair of fibers instead of four or ten

pairs today

TIA TR-42.11 Optical Fiber SystemsNew Project: Wide Band Multimode (WBMMF)

• Standards Implementation - 1.5 years (Products in same time frame)• Proposal in TIA standards group for OM? Specification• Will be backwardly compatible (more expensive than OM4)• Will likely become the de facto standard• Will provide customer with more capacity without resorting to 32-fiber

channels - at least for now…(Only 4 wavelengths for now)• Will allow other CWDM solutions for intermediate speeds

– (2 or 4) x 20 Gb = 40 Gb or 80Gb Ethernet– 2 x 50 Gb = 100 Gb Ethernet

What lies ahead for 100G Enet/128GFC and beyond?

• ASIC Integration

San Jose, CA USAFebruary 2012 36

Chip Scale Photonics

• Gigabit Ethernet & 4/8G FC still workhorses of the typical data center but this is quickly changing to 10G & 16GFC

• 10G Ethernet is the largest revenue generator application in the data center for the next five years

• SFP+ 10GBASE-SR• OM3 and OM4 Fiber• SFP+ DAC 10GBASE-CR• RJ45 10GBASE-T• CAT6A/7 Twisted Pair

• 40G Ethernet is becoming mainstream for access to aggregation/distribution and core connections

• 100G Ethernet is the fastest growing networking technology in the data center over the next five years

Ethernet/FC SummaryHigher Speed Market View

Non-standards based transceivers

• Bidi Technology over two fiber SFP

• “Universal” Optics – For SM & Legacy Cable Plant

• Parallel Singlemode Optics - 40GBASE-PLR4

• Embedded Optics Multispeed Ports

Bidirectional Duplex SFPs

• BiDi – short for bidirectional• 40G Ethernet over two fibers• Allows use of existing LC infrastructure• Uses Wavelength Division Multiplexing – 2 x 20 Gbps signals

‘Universal’ Optics - 40GBASE-UNIV

• Addresses customer concerns around the reduced distances with 40GBASE-SR4

• Migrations from existing 10 to 40GbE networking without requiring a redesign or

expansion of the fiber network

• Supports operation over a full 150 m of OM3 or OM4

• Can be used for up to 500 m and interconnected with both 40GBASE-LR4 and

40GBASE-LRL4

40GBASE-UNIVQSFP

Parallel Singlemode Optics - 40GBASE-PLR4

• Parallel LR4 (PLRL4) supports distances compatible with 10GBASE-LR, (10km on SM

fiber). ‘Lite’ Parallel LR4 (PLRL4) supports distances compatible with 10GBASE-LRL,

(1km on SM fiber)

• Both modules can support 4 individual 10G-LR connections using a 4x10G mode

and fiber breakout cables or cassettes for single mode fiber

• PLR4 and PLRL4 use an MTP-12 connector, and require an APC (Angle polished

connector) single-mode MTP-12 cable

40GBASE-PLR4QSFP

Embedded Optics Multispeed Ports (‘SR12’)

Cable Plant Implications

Leaf-SpineLeaf/Spine Breakout Use Case - Network scaling example

Should you construct a Leaf/Spine fabric with 10G or 40G?

Let’s suppose you’ve decided to build a Leaf/Spine fabric for your data center network with the current crop of 10G/40G switches today that have QSFP ports. Each QSFP port can be configured as a single 1 x 40G interface, or 4 x 10G interfaces (using a breakout cable).

Simple example - build a data center fabric with primary goal of having, say, 1200 10G ports in one fabric. I also want the ability to seamlessly expand this fabric to over 5000 10G servers as necessary without increasing latency or oversubscription.

Leaf-Spine40G-Based Architecture

If I configure each QSFP port in the fabric as a single 40G interface, how wide will I be able to scale in terms of ports?

SPINE (x4 switches)

LEAF (x32 switches)40 ports x 10G(8 ports/switch unused)

1280, 10G ports

Port Mapping(Ethx/1 - ports 0,1,2,3)

Ethx/1 Ethx/2 Ethx/2

Port Grouping on switch

‘Aggregation’ Breakout (1-MPO to 4-LC)Application to 40G Switch

Leaf-Spine10G-Based Architecture

If I configure each QSFP port in the fabric as 4 x 10G interfaces and using an optical breakout cable, how wide will I be able to scale in terms of servers?

SPINE (x16 switches)

LEAF (x128 switches)40 ports x 10G(8 ports/switch unused)

5120, 10G ports

How do we accomplish 100G Breakout to 40G for SR10?

With the SR10 transceiver we are in the unfortunate position of only being able to support 2 40G ports…..

Unlike the ‘SR12’ which can support 3, 40 G ports (because it is really a 120G transceiver in disguise!!)

Looking into the CPAK MPO the top leftmost Rx is dark, therefore 8 of the 10 Rxs in this row can support 2 40G breakouts

Same goes for the bottom Tx row (leftmost Tx is dark), therefore 8 of the TXs in the bottom row can support the Tx side of 2 40G channels

How do we accomplish 100G Breakout to 10G & 40G for ‘SR 12’?

With the ‘SR12’ transceiver we can support 12, 10G breakouts

With the ‘SR12’ transceiver we can support 3, 40G breakouts

SAN Fiber Channel exampleHigh Performance, Storage-Centric ‘Flat’ Network N Architecture

• Design adequate for moderate-size SANs, difficult to scale beyond 1000 ports. Three 256-port directors on each of the A and B sides, for example, would provide 768 ports for direct server and storage connections

• Adding a fourth or fifth director to each side would increase costs, complicate the cable plant, and increase the complexity of the SAN and its management

New FC Blade Technology64G Blades

4-channel QSFP (Quad Small Form-factor Pluggable) optic on the FC16-64 blade enables high density port configuration

Support individual SFP+ 8/16G breakouts

FC16-64 Blade

How Do We Make Really BIG SAN Switches?Old School vs. ‘New’ School

Fiber ICL PortUp to 4 x 16 Gb/s per ICL port

Math for fully populated UltraScale Mesh12 fibers/QSFP x 16/blade x 2 blades = 384 fibers/chassis

&2/blade x 2 (A/B) x 36(mesh) = 144 cables

Max Configuration = 9 x DCX(4608 16 Gb/s per cluster)

UltraScale Mesh with DCX 8510Do We Make Really BIG SAN Switches?

Planning & Best Practices

TIA 568C.0 Single Row Parallel Transmission with array cables - Method ‘B’

Parallel Optics Cable PlantParallel Transmission Example - Ethernet/Fiber Channel

Serial Duplex Cable PlantCassette Model with Cross Connect

Three Different Cords!!!

Migration to Parallel Optics Cable PlantMPO Adapter Panels Model with Cross Connect

One Cord Type

Migration to Parallel Optics Cable PlantMPO Adapter Panels Model with Cross Connect - Gender Changing MPO Trunks

Trade-off between SCS ‘wants’ and IEEE requirements

100 meter OM3 channel with two 0.75dB (Max.) connectors (1.5dB connector insertion loss total)

150 meter OM4 channel with two 0.50dB (Max.) connectors (1.0dB connector insertion loss total)

“Engineered Link”

0.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.001.101.201.301.401.501.60

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

Tota

l Con

nect

or L

oss (

dB)

Maximum Reach (m)

OM3OM4

Source: Panduit extrapolation from IEEE model

MPO-Based 40/100G CablingLink Power Budgeting for Cabling

Migration to Parallel Optics Cable PlantDark Fiber Mitigation - Interconnect Channel

Center four fibers from trunk assemblies routed to 3rd (new) MPO/MTP on cassette front. 4 transmit from trunk ‘A’ and 4 receive from trunk ‘B’

Existing “Day One” 12 fiber MPO/MTP trunks

“Day Two” 8 fiber MPO/MTP patch cords

Migration to Parallel Optics Cable Plant24 Fiber MPO-Based Cable Plant

24 fiber MPO permanent infrastructure can remain constant through cable plant migration from 10G to 40G/100G

But the real beauty in going back to 24 fiber cassettes is the ability to support multiple breakout scenarios in a small form-factor footprint and minimization of the volume (number of legs) of trunk cabling entering the fiber distribution system

24 fiber cassettes(RED – 24 Fiber MPO)

Summary

Highlights and Take-Aways

• Standards Implementation of transceivers – multivendor support and interoperability for non-standards-based PMDs

• Wideband fiber, WDM, Bidi etc. are enablers of “customer-friendly” solutions that extend the lifetime of existing cable plant

• Breakout solutions for transceivers (BASE-4 ports) are most important for network scale in flat architectures (for both LAN & SAN)

• Network-ready status of cable plant for higher speeds and dark fiber can be mitigated by transceiver selection and the choice of cable plant


Recommended