+ All Categories
Home > Documents > HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and...

HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and...

Date post: 13-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 5 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
HIT System Procurement HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 Session 2.03 Presented by: Gerry Hinkley Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and Joseph M. DeLuca IT Optimizers®
Transcript
Page 1: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

HIT System Procurement HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Issues and Pitfalls

Session 2.03Session 2.03

Presented by:Gerry Hinkley

Davis Wright Tremaine LLPand

Joseph M. DeLucaIT Optimizers®

Page 2: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Session Goals• Provide you with• A best practices approach to system

procurement methods, tools and results

• An overview of usage/business models and procurement implications

• The crucial role of the RFP• An understanding of software

licensing and system purchase guidelines

• Tips for negotiating with vendors• Insights into managing the

implementation from a contractual perspective

Page 3: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Business Alignment-Framework for Success

Business/TechnologyOpportunity

New Directions

Rapid Prototype, Pilot & Evaluation

Rollout

Evaluation Cycle

Change Management

“Required for Success”

• Evaluate current business & technology environments

• Establish & prioritize new business initiatives

• New technology can drive new business

• Confirm and establish measures of success, ROI

• Select technology approach• Confirm participants, pilots,

resources & relationships

• Value CREATION• ROI Confirmation• IT validation• Business Plan validation• Continuous value

enhancement

• Value CAPTURE• Benefits realization

Page 4: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

The Systems Lifecycle Process

Envisioning Evaluating Implementing Value AttainmentSelecting

Defining Goals

Detailed Implem

entation Planning

Initial Benefits Planning

Identifying Requirements

Prioritizing & Expectations

Vendor Research & RFP

Demonstrations & Labs

Reference VerificationSite Visits

Benefits Plan/Validation/Pilot

Refined Cost/Benefit AnalysisVendor Negotiation

Implem

entation TrainingClinical Design

Integration/Interface Development

System Configuration

Go Live & Rollout

Testing

Contingency Planning

Workflow

/P&P Changes

The Plan

End User Training

Page 5: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Vendor Selection Methodology & TasksProject Governance

Executive Sponsorship, Design Advisory Committees, Project Team

Project Vision“Framework for Success”

Workflow & Process Design

FULCRUM Vendor Selection ActivitiesRFP>>Vendor Demonstrations>>Vendor Lab>>Site Visits>> Corporate Visits

FULCRUM Vendor Selection Decision Points & ToolsBuyer’s Guide>>Proposal Response Analysis>>Demo Scenario Scoring>>Vendor

Lab Scoring/Future State Validation>>CBA>>Site Visit Evaluations>> Corporate Visit Evaluations

Vendor ContractingOutcomes-Based Contract Terms,Management Incentive Alignment

Page 6: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Creating the Business Model

7-Year Return on Investment

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%Cash Savings Cash & Efficiencies

Cash, Eff iciencies & NewRevenue

Cash , Eff iciencies, NewRevenue & Strategic Impact

($10,000,000)

($5,000,000)

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

Cumulative Returnon Investment

CumulativeExpense Flow

Page 7: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Contracting Method Drives The Model

Traditional Contract• Software/Hardware/Installation

• Based on delivery and acceptance

• Monthly maintenance charge• Penalties for non-performance

Performance Incentive Contract• Traditional Contract• Final payment is tied to achieving a business goal (i.e. No increase in AR

days)• Bonus incentive potential (i.e. Extra payment for a reduction in AR days)

Metric Driven Performance Contract• Minimum base payments by month or transaction• Business or quality metric used to drive goal achievement and payment• “Attainment of a 25% decrease in adverse drug

events will result in a payment of Y”

Joint Venture Contract• Both parties share profit

if goals are attained

Page 8: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Using the RFP To Determine Value

Page 9: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Using the RFP To Determine Value

Page 10: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Using the RFP To Determine Value

Page 11: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Using the RFP To Determine Value

Page 12: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Standard RFP Questions-Still Relevant

Page 13: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

The Value of a Learning Lab…..

Page 14: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Functionality and System Scores vs. Total Cost-5yrs.

500

600

700

800

900

1000

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000Thousands

Total 5 Year Cost

Tota

l Fun

ctio

nalit

y an

d Sy

stem

Sco

re

Vendor E

Vendor D

Vendor B

Vendor C

Vendor AVendor F

RFP Functionality vs. TCO

$1,000 per MD per month

$600 per MD per month

Page 15: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

"Excellent" Category Scores on Clinical Demo vs. Total Cost-5yrs.

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000Thousands

Total 5 Year Cost

# of

"Ex

celle

nt"

Cat

egor

y Sc

ores

on

Clin

ical

D

emo

Vendor E

Vendor D

Vendor B

Vendor CVendor A

Vendor F

Learning Lab “Excellent” Scores vs. TCO

$1,000 per MD per month

$600 per MD per month

Page 16: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Comparing Economic Value

Vendor Comparison - Net Cumulative Cash Flow by VendorCash, Efficiencies, New Revenue & Strategic Impact

-$25,000,000

-$20,000,000

-$15,000,000

-$10,000,000

-$5,000,000

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Years

Vendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor E

Page 17: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Using the RFP To Set Contract Expectations

Page 18: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Structuring the Contract Analysis

Page 19: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• Project management– Staffing

• Choice of who is on the vendor implementation team

• Clause for not soliciting the hiring of practice staff– Timing

• Implementation and payment milestones– Technical environment

• Practice requirements for readiness• Hardware specifications

Page 20: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• How will acceptance testing work?– Define what is the requirements for completion of

acceptance testing– Give the vendor what the requirements are

• Where are the functional specifications?– In the contract, rely on the RFP, others?

• What training support is provided?– Initial training and on-going– Included in the maintenance agreement

Page 21: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• What maintenance support is provided? – 24/7 help desk– On-site within 24 hours, if issue

cannot be resolved remotely– Financial remediation

• What updates will be provided?– Fixes to minor issues– Commitment to provide regular

updates– Included in the maintenance

fees

Page 22: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• What enhancements will be provided?– Vendor developed versus practice initiated– Practice obligations to purchase vendor

enhancements• Do I have to buy new releases to be supported? • What happens if I have problems?

– Critical errors– Repair/replace– Substitute software/equipment

Page 23: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• What happens if you go out of business?

• What taxes will I have to pay?– Physical media versus electronic

transmission– Strategies to mitigate

• What happens if the software infringes third party software?– Vendor buys rights for practice to

continue to use the software– Purchase price refund

Page 24: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Questions to Ask the Vendor

• Who is responsible if a patient gets hurt?– Typically, practice maintains responsibility– Ensure adequate insurance for software

malfunction• How do I terminate maintenance and what

happens?– Requirements to return or destroy software– Timeframes for notification

Page 25: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concepts

• Licensing vs. purchasing• Functional specifications• Documentation• Acceptance testing• Pricing methods• Change orders• Proprietary rights

Page 26: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concepts (cont.)

• Is the vendor your HIPAA business associate?• Warranties• Indemnification• Damages, disclaimers and limitations on liability• Reciprocal obligations• Software escrow

Page 27: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Licensing vs. Purchasing

• Licensing– Rights to use the EHR software in your

practice– Vendor determines who can use the EHR

software• Purchasing

– Typically, custom software– Unusual for the vendor to provide the practice

with rights to EHR software code

Page 28: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Functional Specifications

• Definition of what the practice will receive from a functional perspective

• Protects the practice if there are performance failures by the vendor during or after implementation

• Based upon documentation outlined in the agreement

Page 29: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Documentation

• Provides warranty that the EHR software will perform as described in the documentation

• Typically included are the User Guides and supporting implementation documentation

• There can be a difference between what the sales persons verbally promises and what is documented in the functional specifications

• Request for Proposal (RFP) response should be designated as part of documentation

Page 30: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Acceptance Testing

• Understand what the EHR vendor identifies as to when testing begins and ends– Installation and ability to use the equipment– Users have “signed-off” on full production

testing• The practice should understand when testing

can begin and the criteria for acceptance• Incremental payments should be tied to

acceptance testing

Page 31: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Pricing Methods• License

– Typically, 30-40% upon installation– Then incremental based upon milestones

• Maintenance– Typically, monthly fee based upon a metric– Can be variable based upon practice satisfaction– To maintain warranties, must be maintained and

software releases current• Implementation

– Understand contract requirements– Try to align with customary business practices– Travel management

Page 32: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Change Orders

• Changes to functionality – Additional cost for

vendor upgrades– Obtain agreement in

writing• Changes to license

– Expand seats– Maintain volume

negotiated discounts

Page 33: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Proprietary Rights

• Vendor will limit copies or changes to EHR software to be made

• Practice needs to retain the rights to the patient data– Agreement clearly identifies the practice as

owning the data– If there is a termination of the license, an

orderly transition exists to extract the data

Page 34: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – HIPAA Business Associate

• The vendor is a Business Associate if the vendor provides services that the practice would normally related to patient care, payment or business operations provide and vendor has access to “protected health information”

• Appropriate agreement is required

Page 35: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Warranties

• Performance– EHR software, as delivered performs to the functional

specifications and documentation– Clause for the vendor to comply with state and federal

regulatory compliance• Infringement

– Assurance against the risk that the vendors software doesn’t infringe on another vendor’s proprietary software

– Practice rights to the data need to be maintained

Page 36: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Indemnification

• Infringement– Protects against infringement claims against the

vendor that the practice can continue to use the software

– Practice can continue to utilize the EHR software and the vendor will provide defense and pay damages

• Confidentiality– HIPAA violation, the vendor will be accountable

• Compliance– Comply with state and federal regulatory bodies

Page 37: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Damages, Disclaimers, Limitations on Liability

• If software is not functioning to specifications and the EHR system cannot be repaired by the vendor the practice has the ability to:– Withdraw the EHR system– Obtain a refund from the vendor– Vendor pays the additional cost of

replacing the system

Page 38: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Reciprocal Obligations

• Site preparations– The practice has responsibilities and penalties

if the practice site is not prepared to receive EHR software

• Installation– Equipment delivery and storage– Adherence to project plan– Determining testing start

Page 39: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Key Concept – Software Escrow

• Protection if the vendor goes out of business or ceases to support the practice

• Ensures practice has access to the source code and can provide for alternate maintenance of the system

Page 40: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

Thank You for Participating

For more information, contact us:Gerry HinkleyPartnerDavis Wright Tremaine [email protected]

Joseph DeLucaManaging Practice DirectorIT Optimizers®[email protected]

Page 41: HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls · 2006-09-25 · HIT System Procurement Issues and Pitfalls Session 2.03 ... New Directions Rapid Prototype, Pilot ... Envisioning Evaluating

The purpose of this presentation is to inform and comment upon transactions in the health care industry. It is not intended, nor should it be used, as a substitute for specific legal advice, as legal counsel may only be given in response to inquiries regarding particular situations.


Recommended