+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Hitchcock Lecture 5

Hitchcock Lecture 5

Date post: 15-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: chin
View: 30 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Hitchcock Lecture 5. The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934). Lecture 5. Lecture: One can never know too much (about Hitchcock) Screening: The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934 or version 2 (1955) Reading: Cohen Vol 1 Part 2 Continued - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
84
Hitchcock Lecture 5 The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934)
Transcript
Page 1: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Hitchcock Lecture 5

The Man Who Knew Too Much

(1934)

Page 2: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Lecture 5

Lecture: One can never know too much (about Hitchcock)

Screening: The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934 or version 2 (1955)

Reading: Cohen Vol 1 Part 2 Continued

Recommended Readings: Sloan, J. Hitchcock: The Definitive Bibliography (pp. 120-123);pp28-65)

Zizek, S "One can never know too much about Hitchcock" (Reader)

Stam, Burgoyne, Flitterman Part II "Cine-Semiology"

Page 4: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 5: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The 39 Steps (1935)

Novel by John Buchan

                           

Page 6: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Sabotage (1936)

Based on Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness

                           

Page 7: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The Secret Agent (1936)

Novel by W. Somerset Maughm

                           

Page 8: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Hitchcock and women

“Throughout his work Hitchcock reveals a fascinated and fascinating tension, an oscillation, between attraction to the feminine… and a corresponding need to erect, sometimes brutally, a barrier to the femininity which is perceived as all-absorbing.”

– Tania Modleski The women who knew too much: Hitchcock and Feminist Theory, Methuen, New York, 1988 p 42

Page 9: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934)

Production • Produced by Michael Balcon• Written by Charles Bennett and D. B. Wyndham-

Lewis• Edwin Greenwood and A.R. Rawlinson (scenario) • Starring: Leslie Banks• Edna Best• Peter Lorre• Nova Pilbeam• Frank Vosper

Page 10: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Peter Lorre

Peter Lorre (June 26, 1904 – March 23, 1964), born László Loewenstein, was an Austro-Hungarian actor frequently typecast as a sinister foreigner. He made an international sensation in 1931 with his portrayal of a serial killer who preys on little girls in Fritz Lang’s film M. Lorre also appears in Casablanca (1943)

Page 12: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 13: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 14: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 15: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 16: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 17: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Charles Bennett b. 2/Aug/1899 d: 15/Jun/1995

Author of the stage play Blackmail with whom Hitchcock had a fruitful working relationship. His association with Hitchcock continued into the 1930s, with Bennett writing some of the latter's most famous British films - "The Man Who Knew Too Much", "The 39 Steps", "Secret Agent", "Sabotage" and "Young and Innocent". Bennett left England to work with Hitchcock on his first American film, "Foreign Correspondent" in 1940.

Page 18: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 19: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 20: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 21: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The Man Who Knew Too Much (1955)James Stewart ... Dr. Benjamin McKenna

Doris Day ... Josephine Conway McKenna

Brenda De Banzie ... Lucy Drayton (as Brenda de Banzie)

Bernard Miles ... Edward Drayton

Ralph Truman ... Inspector Buchanan

Daniel Gélin ... Louis Bernard (as Daniel Gelin)

Mogens Wieth ... Ambassador

Alan Mowbray ... Val Parnell

Hillary Brooke ... Jan Peterson

Christopher Olsen ... Hank McKenna

Reggie Nalder ... Rien

Richard Wattis ... Assistant Manager

Noel Willman ... Woburn

Alix Talton ... Helen Parnell

Yves Brainville ... Police Inspector

Page 22: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 23: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 24: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Plotline

Dr. Ben McKenna, his wife Jo and their son Hank are on a touring holiday of Africa when they meet the mysterious Louis Bernard on a bus. The next day Bernard is murdered in the local marketplace, but before he dies he manages to reveal details of an assassination about to take place in London. Fearing that their plot will be revealed, the assassins kidnap Hank in order to keep the McKenna's silent. Ben and Jo go to London and take matters into their own hands.

Page 25: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Documentary edge

The shootout at the end of the film was based on the Sidney Street Siege, a real-life incident which took place in London on 3 January 1911 when a group of anarchists conducted a long gun battle with the Police after barricading themselves into an East end house. The Siege of Sidney Street, popularly known as the "Battle of Stepney” ended with the deaths of two members of a politically-motivated gang of burglars supposedly led by Peter Piaktow, a.k.a. "Peter the Painter", and sparked a major political row over the involvement of the home secretary, Winston Churchill.

Page 26: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 27: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 28: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 29: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 30: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The ‘MacGuffin’ or ‘McGuffin’

The McGuffin’ which is, in effect, nothing!Hitchcock explained the term in a 1939 lecture at Columbia University: "[We] have a name in the studio, and we call it the 'MacGuffin.' It is the mechanical element that usually crops up in any story. In crook stories it is most always the necklace and in spy stories it is most always the papers.“http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~muffin/

Page 31: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Truffaut Interview (1966)

"It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men in a train. One man says, 'What's that package up there in the baggage rack?' And the other answers, 'Oh that's a McGuffin.' The first one asks 'What's a McGuffin?' 'Well' the other man says, 'It's an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highland.' The first man says, 'But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,' and the other one answers 'Well, then that's no McGuffin!' So you see, a McGuffin is nothing at all."

Page 32: Hitchcock Lecture 5

McGuffin examples

• The eponymous statuette in John Huston’s The Maltese Falcon (1941).

• “The man who knew Too Much” Message in the shaving brush “Wapping G. Barbor make contact A. Hall, March 21st”

• The uranium bottles in Notorious (1946)

Page 33: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Week 6

The 39 Steps (1935)

Page 34: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Lecture 6: Doubling in Hitchcock’s Film

Screening: The 39 Steps (1935)Reading: Cohen Vol. 1 The Slave revolt of memory” R to the power of gamma pp 110-126Recommended Readings:

Sloan, J. Hitchcock: The Definitive Bibliography (pp. 124-127)Hitchcock "Core of the Movie - The Chase" (Reader)

Page 35: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Hitchcock's preferred method of dispatch

Strangling!

Page 36: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Scissors

“The best way to do it is with scissors” but the quintessential aesthetically pleasing murder endorsed by Hitchcock seems to be the strangle which provides an opportunity for viewing a protracted struggle - a life and death spectacle - between two or more protagonists.

Page 37: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Paraphilia

Paraphilia a term used in psycho-pathology to categorize a clinically defined deviancy that causes those afflicted to seek sexual gratification by raping, stabbing and throttling women and children.

Page 38: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The strangle

Instances of murder by strangling appear in fifteen of his films: The Lodger, Shadow of a Doubt, Notorious, Stage Fright, the late version of The Man Who Knew Too Much, Vertigo and North by North West.

Strangling is graphically detailed in The Lady Vanishes, Jamaica Inn, Rope, Strangers on a Train, Dial M for Murder, Rear Window, Torn Curtain and Frenzy– Spoto, 1983:353

Page 39: Hitchcock Lecture 5

“It’s all in the details” Hitch

Zizek Discusses these details somewhat differently as sinthoms -- “characteristic details which persist without implying common meaning”

“Hitchcockian Sinthoms” in Zizek, Slavoj Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan (But were frightened to ask Hitchcock )London, Verso 1992)

Page 40: Hitchcock Lecture 5

According to author Ken Mogg, the screenwriter Angus MacPhail, a friend of Hitchcock, may have originally coined the term.

Page 41: Hitchcock Lecture 5

demarks

And Deleuze terms the symbolic details in Hitchcock’s works “demarks”that areoriginal signs that stand apart from a series of signs. He cites the sails of the windmill in ForeignCorrespondent that turn in the opposite direction to the wind, the glass of milk in Suspicion, the key that doesnot open the door in Suspicion and the airplane crop sprayer where there are no crops in North by Northwest. 1

1.Deleuze, G. Cinema 1: The Movement Image trans Tomlinson, H., and Habberjam Minneapolis,University of Minnesota Press 1986 p 203

Page 42: Hitchcock Lecture 5

fetish items and narrative drivers

The glove (Blackmail), a ring (Shadow of a Doubt), keys and purses (Notorious, Under Capricorn, Dial M for Murder, Marnie) or tiepin (Frenzy), and bars about which much has been written by Hitchcock scholars: Robin Wood, Sydney Gottlieb, Tania Modleski, Raymond Bellour, Slavoj Zizek, Tom Cohen, Mladen Dolar among others.

See Demonsablon, P., “Lexique mythologique pour l’oeuvre de Hitchcock Cahiers du Cinéma 11 :no 62 18-29, 54-55 1956 An alphabetical listing of recurring objects and motifs in Hitchcock’s films, rings, keys, cats etc. also in Manz, H P Alfred Hitchcock: Eine Bildchronik Zurich, Sancoussi 1962

Page 43: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Hitchcock's views on art

“Let's say I'm a painter who paints flowers. What interests me is the way in which things are treated. But on the other hand, if I were a painter, I would say: ‘I can only paint something that contains a message.’”(Alfred Hitchcock) Chabrol, C. & Rohmer, Eric. Hitchcock: the First

Forty-Four Films, Translated by Stanley Hochman, New York, Frederick Ungar, 1957/1979: xi

Page 44: Hitchcock Lecture 5

I’m not self-indulgent where content is concerned. I’m only self- indulgent about treatment. I’d compare myself to an abstract painter. My favourite painter is Klee (Alfred Hitchcock)– McGilligan, P. Alfred Hitchcock: A Life in

Darkness and Light. New York, Regan Books Harper Collins 2003:476

Page 45: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 46: Hitchcock Lecture 5

John Buchan

Page 47: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 48: Hitchcock Lecture 5

The 39 Steps 1935

Page 49: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 50: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 51: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 52: Hitchcock Lecture 5

How Important?

In 1999 it was named 4th in a British Film Institute of British films, while in 2004 Total Film named it the 21st greatest British movie of all time. Recognized by Hitch as his first major production.

Page 53: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 54: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 55: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 56: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 57: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Robert Donat (Friedriche Robert Donath)

(1905-1958)

Page 58: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Robert Donat

R D made fewer than twenty films in contracts with MGM, Warners and RKO

The Private Life of Henry VIII(1933)

Goodbye Mr Chips (1939)

The Winslow Boy (1948)

Page 59: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Madeleine Carroll (1906- 1987)

Page 60: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Madeleine Carroll

One of Hitchcock’s earliest prototypical ice cool, glib, intelligent blondes

                                 

                           

Page 61: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 62: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 63: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 64: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 65: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 66: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 67: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 68: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 69: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 70: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 71: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 72: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 73: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 74: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 75: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 76: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 77: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 78: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 79: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 80: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 81: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 82: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 83: Hitchcock Lecture 5
Page 84: Hitchcock Lecture 5

Recommended