+ All Categories
Home > Education > Homepage - Website

Homepage - Website

Date post: 10-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: 109669
View: 39 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Welcome The initial founders of Working Title are Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe. Working Title has been co- chaired by Tim Bevan and Tim Fellman since 1992. Working Title has worked with the worlds most known film companies, such as: Working Title have produced very popular films since they started, such as: Welcom e Market Position Competitor s Film Analysis Film Review Produc ts Search: Target Audience s Distributi on Advertisin g Legal + Ethical Questionn aire Surve y Analysis of Media Organisation s
Transcript

WelcomeThe initial founders of Working Title are Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe.Working Title has been co-chaired by Tim Bevan and Tim Fellman since 1992.

Working Title has worked with the worlds most known film companies, such as: Warner Brothers, Universal and Lionsgate.

Working Title have produced very popular films since they started, such as:

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Paul is one of their more recent successful comedy

films.

Director: Greg Motto

Screenplay: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost

Cast

‘’Two British comic-book geeks traveling across the U.S. encounter an alien outside Area 51.’’

Director: Brian Helgeland

Screenplay: William Hjortsberg

ProductsWorking Title has helped make some of the worlds best known films. Here are two and some information about them. Legend is one of

the most recent successful films Working Title has worked on.

Cast

The film tells the story of the identical twin gangsters Reggie and Ronnie Kray, two of the most notorious criminals in British history, and their organised crime empire in the East End of London during the 1960s.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Market Position

Working Title has increased its population mainly by the placement of genre of the films that they’ve helped produce. They’ve then branched out to bigger companies such as PolyGram and Universal.

Without the production of films involving big companies such as Universal and PolyGram, Working Title may not be as well known as they are today, nether making the amount of money they make today.

All of the films that Working Title have helped to produce haven't been a success of some sorts, the majority will have made them a profit but some, not so much.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

CompetitorsDue to the film industry

being as big as it is, Working Title has many

competitors such as Film Four LTD and StudioCanal or any other film company

for that matter.

Having competitors is never easy, it means that

you obviously have to compete with other film companies which could result in you not making as much money as you’d

hoped for in the beginning, especially when they’re more popular than you.

Logos of listed competing companies.

Here are some of the most recent films made by these

companies and how the statistics stack up against

each other in terms of gross profit.

WorkingTitleMr Bean’s Holiday

Gross = $33 Million

StudioCanalSlumdog Millionaire Gross = $141 Million

Film4Paddington

Gross = $76 Million

WorkingTitleLesMiserables

Gross = $149 Million

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

DatabaseFilm Title Box Office Gross Production Cost Release Date Genre

Paul $101 Million $40 Million 18th March 2011 Comedy, Sci-Fi

Everest $192 Million $65 Million 25th September 2015 Adventure, Drama

The Theory of Everything $15 Million $121 Million 26th November 2014 Drama, Romance

Les Miserables $442 Million $61 Million 25th December 2012 Action, Comedy

Johnny English – Reborn $165 Million $45 Million 21st October 2011 Action ,Comedy

Mr Beans Holiday $230 Million $25 Million 24th August 2007 Comedy, Family

Nanny McPhee $123 Million $34 Million 27th January 2006 Comedy, Family

Shaun of the Dead $30 Million $4 Million 24th September 2004 Horror, Comedy

Legend $35 Million $25 Million 20th November 2015 Crime, Thriller

Contraband $96 Million $50 Million 13th January 2012 Action, Crime, Drama

Back to Film Review

Next Page

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Back to Database

Film Title Mise en Scene Iconography Semiotics Connotations

Paul

In Paul the arrangement of the props and the chosen scenery of the

film was set out cleverly to add to the narrative of the film. The characters didn’t come across any civilisation through the desert, so this adds the original idea of a desert, with it being empty with

nothing in it.

Struggling writers, making the most of

what they have, as seen in the images below,

their camper van shows their wealth, not very expensive items, food lying around, this all adds to the effect.

The film tries to make you attached to the

character Paul due to his appearance, big

eyes, some audiences may find him ‘cute’ or easily loved so when

the scene comes when dies, people will feel

sympathy.

In the scene where the blind woman comes into the film, seen as though she can’t see

Paul, she acts completely normal, no negativity towards him whereas if she was able to see then she’d most likely have a different

reaction to the character, but she acts

differently than normal.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Film Analysis

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Due to the results on my survey, I can identify that the main age of the people who

watched my film were aged between 13-15 and 16-20 due to 2 being in each column its

split even.12 or be-low

13 to 15

16 to 20

21 to 25

26+0

1

2

3

How old are you?

Number of Partic-ipants

On the gender sides of things, it was fairly even, 3 males were

surveyed and 2 females. I would say that mainly males would

stereotypically watch this film due to the action-packed scenes

that take place. Male Female0

0.51

1.52

2.53

Are you male or female?

Number of partic-ipants

Next Page

Target Audience

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

I then asked the participants how often they watched comedy films and if they enjoyed watching them and if so, why. This then gives an indication to what the rest of the

questionnaire is going to turn out like.

Very Often

Often

Someti

mesRare

lyNeve

r0

0.51

1.52

2.53

How regularly do you watch comedy films?

Number of participants

Yes Sometimes Never0123

Enjoy watching comedy films?

Number of partic-ipants

If answer was yes, why?Good to LaughThey’re funny, enlightens the mood and makes me happyBrightens the mood, a lot better than horror/action films Next PagePrevious Page

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Next PagePrevious Page

I then moved off of the generic questions and started to ask

questions about the film specifically to find out their experience. These

questions involve what they enjoyed about it, and if not, what

could've been done to improve the film in general.

Enjoy watching Paul? Why?Enjoyed it - Funny Scenes, loved the charactersCould've been betterIt was alright - My sense of humour, got a bit boring over timeIt was alright - Quite funny, not quite into talking aliensIt was alright - Good concept of the friendship between alien + human

If answer was 'Could've been better' or 'Not at all' what could’ve changed?Could've been better - Not really into talking aliens

Favourite part of film, why?When the guy got shot gunned - Funniest partWhen Paul spins a donut on his finger - Because it’s funnyThe entering of Paul - DramaticDidn't have oneWhere Paul is in the toilet, he comes out then a woman passes out - Funny

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Return to Film AnalysisPrevious Page

Finally, for the last 2 questions, I finished it off by asking if

they'd recommend the film to family or friends to get an idea of their overall experience and then to rate the film out of 10.

Very Lik

elyLik

ely

Unlikely

Very Unlike

ly0

1

2

3

How likely to recommend Paul to family or friends

Number of Partic-ipants

What would you rate Paul? Participant No.6 17 27 34 49 5

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Film Review

This video is my film reviewof Paul.

Written Film Review Database

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

ExpectationsAt first I wasn’t sure what quite to expect from this film due to it including some well-known actors but then the storyline is based on an alien. The producer isn’t as well-known as the actors, producing one well known title; Super Bad. As soon as seeing the trailer, which mainly focused on the special FX, the film looked like

just another ‘Pegg and Frost’ comedy leading from Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead. The trailer left me wanting to see the film instantly due to the action

packed events that took place. With that being said, it was overall an entertaining, humorous film to watch.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Back to Web Page

To advertise this film, they went as far as they could with their set budget of $40,000,000 (estimated). By putting it onto buses, in newspapers, websites, and trailers on YouTube, television or even interviews on the radio they received much more publicity and excitement for the release date of the film. They didn’t put adverts in the newspapers as much due to it being a bigger film

so they went for the bigger options. The film made a gross profit worldwide of $101,000,000 (estimate).

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Advertisement

Back to Web Page

Judging by the rest of the comedy films Simon Pegg and Nick Frost have produced together, this one was expected to be no surprise but to be as funny and entertaining. The film got many

negative reviews due to the film apparently being produced just for the geeky kinds of people, then mentioning how it should’ve made the film to suit all audiences, not just one. In my opinion

the film suits all different audiences, family, comedy, geeky, children, basically anyone, fair enough not everyone will approve to the film, it might not be their sense of humour but there’ll definitely be at least a selection of people from each audience group that approves to the film. On the other hand Paul is a geek friendly film with it involving aliens; it’ll immediately spark an

interest for the alien lovers to go see it.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Reviews

Back to Web Page

There are plenty of camera shots used in the film Paul. In the scene where Paul is entered into the film and meets Frost and Pegg, close up camera shots are used on Paul, Frost and Pegg to

emphasise the shock on the 2 humans’ faces and then the calm expression given by Paul. An extreme close up is used where Pegg and Frost have their first sighting of Paul and the extreme

close up is to then show their immediate reaction and emotions. The two shot and the over-the-shoulder shot is used here also to capture more than one reaction at once, for example when the

camera is looking over Paul’s shoulder at Frost and Pegg, this shows their reaction but then emphasises the size difference between Paul and the humans. The wide shot is then used in the scene right at the beginning of the film where Frost and Pegg are driving their RV down a long

road through the desert, this sets the location where the film is set.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Camera Shots

Back to Web Page

With the main storyline and the audience already being discussed, the cast was very well chose, no doubt a lot of time was taken to think out the right actors for each part to play and then one

of the most important roles – the voiceover for Paul. If I had to choose the cast and have different actors in any scene I wanted, I don’t think I could fault a single one of them. Something that

surprised me was the fact that Pegg and Frost both worked together to create the screenplay for the film, so I then found out that was the reason for all of the references to other films and then the other clever gags. At the start of the film the characters create small jokes between them or

share them with everyone whom they then end up repeating endlessly throughout the film which becomes funnier as the film goes on, they do this with a collection of different jokes.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Cast Choice

Back to Web Page

Going off on a bit of a tangent, the release date of this film was on Valentine’s Day. I wouldn’t suggest going to see this film on Valentine’s Day as it isn’t the most romantic film I’ve ever seen but it sure is an entertaining film to watch. Another surprise was the fact that it was released on

Valentine’s Day and it was still a big box office hit.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Release Date

Back to Web Page

All in all I enjoyed watching Paul, it’s my sense of humour and it’s the kind of film you can watch over and over and still find funny. I’d definitely recommend this as a film to watch with the family,

or with friends.

AdvertisementsExpectations Reviews Camera Shots Cast Choice Release Date Conclusion

Search:

Conclusion

Back to Web Page

Distribution

Advertising

Here are some of the most well known Film

Distribution Companies worldwide.

My case study – Paul was distributed by Working Title who

weren't as popular as some of the companies shown on the left of the page, this is why to get bigger, they

made films with the companies, such as Universal, Warner Bro’s,

etc.

Here is the trailer for my

film Paul

The way in which Paul is made to look makes the audience generate feelings for the character – Big eyes, such as a dog which emphasises cuteness.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Legal + EthicalWelcome Market

Position Competitors Film Analysis

Film Review

Products

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

The film Paul doesn’t present many Ethical

issues due to the amount of CGI used in

the film.

The main ethical issue about Paul is about the amount of males and

females present in the film, there are plenty more male characters that

enter the film than females but then the main female actor is blind.

An issue some people might see Paul as an

ethical problem with him being a male.

Next Page

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Legal + Ethical Exclusivity and ConfidentialityA non-disclosure agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that

outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but with to restrict access to or by third parties.

Intellectual PropertyThis refers to creations of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce. It’s divided into two

categories: Industrial property, this includes inventions. The second category is copyright which includes literary.

Copyright and TrademarksThis applies to work that is recorded in some way. Rights exist in items such as

literary, artistic, musical or even dramatic work, as well as films. Trademarks are registered at a national or territory level with an appointed government body and

may take anywhere between 6 and 18 months to prepare.

Public LiabilityPublic liability insurance is crucial when filming in public

locations due to it paying out in the event of a mistake which causes an injury to a member of public, or which damages their

property.

Employers Liability InsuranceEmployers are responsible for their health and safety of their

employees during the working hours, this applies to any workplace. Employees may be injured at work or may become ill as a result of attending work. If the employee feels like the

employer is responsible then they can attempt to claim compensation.

Employees RightsThe rights that an employee has to be treated in a fair, morally

acceptable, or legal way: There has also been an increase in the level of awareness of issues such as health and safety and

employee rights.

RacismIn the past many films have had racist scenes or the nature of the

whole film is seen to be racist. It stopped in many films due to them being banned in certain countries because of their religions or cultures that they had or some even get banned completely from being showed

to the public because they’re seen to be that offensive.

Previous Page

SexismThis is similar to racism in the fact that it does still happen

in filming subtly but not as often as in the past due to more people being aware of it now and the fact that a lot of people believe in equal rights and so they stand up for

women’s rights, even in filming.

QuestionnaireThe question

choices were made to be very simple so then people can quickly answer them when they had to. The age range I went for was teenagers, 13-20 due to teens been more likely to watch the film.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Survey

Male Female0

0.51

1.52

2.53

Are you male or female?

Number of partic-ipants

12 or be-low

13 to 15

16 to 20

21 to 25

26+0

1

2

3

How old are you?

Number of Partic-ipants

Very Often

Often

Someti

mesRare

lyNeve

r0

0.51

1.52

2.53

How regularly do you watch comedy films?

Number of participants

Yes Sometimes Never0

0.51

1.52

2.53

Enjoy watching comedy films?

Number of participants

If answer was yes, why?Good to LaughThey’re funny, enlightens the mood and makes me happyBrightens the mood, a lot better than horror/action films

Enjoy watching Paul? Why?Enjoyed it - Funny Scenes, loved the charactersCould've been betterIt was alright - My sense of humour, got a bit boring over timeIt was alright - Quite funny, not quite into talking aliensIt was alright - Good concept of the friendship between alien + human

Next PageIf answer was 'Could've been better' or 'Not at all' what could’ve changed?Could've been better - Not really into talking aliens

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Survey

Previous Page

Favourite part of film, why?When the guy got shot gunned - Funniest partWhen Paul spins a donut on his finger - Because it’s funnyThe entering of Paul - DramaticDidn't have oneWhere Paul is in the toilet, he comes out then a woman passes out - Funny

Very Lik

elyLik

ely

Unlikely

Very Unlike

ly0123

How likely to recommend Paul to family or friends

Number of Partic-ipantsWhat would you rate Paul? Participant No.

6 17 27 34 49 5

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Analysis of Media Organisations

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Active + Passive Audiences

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Passive and Active Audiences

Next PageBack to Analysis of Media

Organisations

Passive and Active Audiences

Previous Page

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Survey

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Passive and Active Questionnaire

I asked specific questions to the readers to get the answers I’d

like. There are only a few issues in Paul that would concern an active or passive audience so there aren’t many questions

that I could ask.The whole reason I’m asking the

audience questions is to determine whether they’re an active or passive audience and then to see their views on the

questions asked.

Next Page

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Passive and Active Questionnaire

With the responses I got from my desired questions, I can now determine whether the person answering the questions was part of an active or passive

audience.With this being said, the

responses I received on the first 2 questions were more in depth and showed that the person had an answer. Whereas question 3 showed that there might not be

a major sign of class differentiation.

Previous PageAnalysis + Conclusion

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Passive and Active Questionnaire

With the results that I have gathered I can now make a judgement on

whether the audience that answered the questionnaire was an active or

passive audience. With that being said, with the specific responses I got the response was a mix between both

active and passive with the last answer being passive and not noticing any

different classes in Paul. On the other hand with the first and second answers

this shows evidence of them being part of an active audience by them

going into more detail about the answer and not just stating the

obvious.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Target Audience for my film

The types of people that would watch my film are most likely people with a open mind set

and a sense of humour seen as though Paul has many jokes

throughout it. The age of the intended audience isn't very

specific, it would be aimed more at children / the younger

audiences due to the nature of the film being about an alien

who can talk.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Production ProcessesPre -

Production

Paul has an incredibly long script and so here is just a small

portion of the script.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Production ProcessesPre -

ProductionHere are just some of the

actors and directors involved in the making of Paul.

Welcome Market Position Competitors Film

AnalysisFilm

ReviewProducts

Search:

Target Audiences

Distribution Advertising

Legal + Ethical Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of Media

Organisations

Production ProcessesPrinciple

PhotographyIt took around 10 months to

film Paul with small breaks in-between switching locations. The film would’ve been filmed

with professional camera crews and top of the range

equipment.

Post Production

There was plenty of editing to be done on Paul, including

sound effects and visual special effects. Due to the

main character being an alien CGI was used to the best of

the editors ability.


Recommended