Homework: Influences on Voters RQs due Tuesday

FrontPage: NNIGN

“MoneyBall”

• Do you believe that the way baseball is financed is fair?

• If not, should it be?

Money

and Politics

Money in politics: a “necessary evil?”

• The goal of any campaign is, of course, to win the election.• What must a candidate do to win?

• Do candidates really need money to do this?

• What does this money buy for the candidate?

Raising Money for the Campaigns• Where do candidates get money?

• Individuals – more often the largest source of donations for challengers; depends on the candidate

• PACs – committees/groups whose sole purpose is to raise and spend money on campaigns

• Personal finances – candidates can loan themselves money to run

• Public financing – presidential candidates can opt to take public money, but then they are limited in how much their own campaign can spend

Homework: Influences on Voters RQs due Tuesday

FrontPage: NNIGN“Ron Paul said it’s still too early to count him out as the Republican nominee. Seriously? That’s like Newt Gingrich saying it’s too early to count him out as an Abercrombie model.” –Jimmy Fallon

“Newt Gingrich's campaign is charging people $50 to pose for a picture with Newt. And for $100 you can get one without Newt.” –Conan O'Brien

“President Obama warned North Korea’s Kim Jong Un that ‘bad behavior will not be rewarded.’ Then Kim asked, “So, how do you explain another season of 'Jersey Shore'?” –Conan O’Brien

“The Supreme Court is deciding right now whether the government can mandate that all Americans buy health insurance. Rick Santorum said, ‘There's no way I'm letting the government make me go on a man date.’” –Conan O’Brien

“Yesterday on CNN, White House adviser David Plouffe referred to the Republican presidential race as a ‘clown show.’ That’s as rough as it gets on CNN. Romney, Santorum, Paul, and Gingrich all called the statement ridiculous and then piled into one tiny car and drove off.” –Jimmy Fallon

David Letterman’s “Top Ten Questions To Ask Yourself Before Spending $50

On A Photo With Newt Gingrich” • 10. How much have I paid for pictures with other guys named

Newt? • 9. Should I just photograph myself burning $50? • 8. Do I look Newty enough? • 7. Should I just get a free photo with some other guy who's

not going to be president? • 6. Do I have to touch him? • 5. Is this how Newt met his three wives? • 4. Seriously, have I lost my mind? • 3. Does Newt have to be in the photo? • 2. What would Rick Santorum think of this idea? • 1. Will Rush Limbaugh think I'm a slut?

Limits on Spending?

• Do you believe that government has the right to limit how much someone could spend in support of a candidate? Why or why not?

• What recent law (2002) was passed by Congress to limit spending in campaigns?

Current Campaign Donation LimitsType To candidate To Party To PAC Aggregate Total --

Individual $2,500 per Election to a Federal candidate -- primary, runoff, and general election counts as a separate election.

$30,800 per calendar year

$5000 per calendar year

$117,000 per two-year election cycle as follows:$46,200 per two-year cycle to cand.$70,800 per two-year cycle to all national party committees and PACs

PAC $5000; per election $15,000 per party per calendar year

$5000 per calendar year

No Limit

Party $5000 No Limit $5000 No Limit, except for Senate candidate per campaign

Contribution limits are adjusted for inflation each odd-numbered year

McConnell vs. FEC

• Soon after the BCRA was passed, it was challenged in the Supreme Court by the Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell…• What do you think the supporters of the law would claim

in defense of the law?

• In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld most of the BCRA’s limitations on spending.

•Ban on “soft” money = Ban on “soft” money = constitutionalconstitutional•Limits on “issue” ads = Limits on “issue” ads = constitutionalconstitutional•New contribution limits = New contribution limits = constitutionalconstitutional•Ban on contribs by minors = Ban on contribs by minors = unconstitutional unconstitutional

Citizens United vs. FEC

• A historic 2010 Supreme Court case/decision

• Citizens United is a non-profit group• describes its mission as being dedicated to restoring the United States government to "citizens'

control" and to "assert American values of limited government, freedom of enterprise, strong families, and national sovereignty and security." To fulfill this mission, Citizens United undertakes various educational projects, including television advertising and feature-length documentaries

• Created a movie called “Hillary: The Movie”• Was blocked by the BCRA from being shown up to 30

days before a Democratic primary election. • Barred because it was considered “express advocacy”, in this

case against a candidate

• Citizens United sued, claiming that they have a First Amendment right to create and air a movie anytime

The Decision in Citizens United

• By a 5-to-4 vote along ideological lines, the majority held that under the First Amendment, corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited.

• One of the results of this decision was the creation of…

Super-PACs

• New groups that have popped up in the wake of the Citizens United decision• This decision essentially said that any group can spend

as much as it wants to influence any election, as long as it was not “coordinated” with a campaign

• Unlike PACs, which are limited in how much they can give to a candidate, Super-PACs don’t really give money to candidates

• They are more concerned with influencing the outcome of elections, through issue ads and other methods used to influence voters.

Money And Politics

• Certainly the impact of money and campaigns is at least a “mixed bag”. Next it will be our job to investigate just how much money we are talking about.

• All in all, we should begin to form an opinion about how we can most effectively deal with the “necessary evil” that money seems to be in the electoral process…