Click here to load reader
Click here to load reader
9182 Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 9182–9184 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Honeycomb nanogold networks with highly active sitesw
Blake J. Plowman, Anthony P. O’Mullane,* PR Selvakannan and Suresh K. Bhargava*
Received 7th September 2010, Accepted 11th October 2010
DOI: 10.1039/c0cc03696j
The formation of macroporous honeycomb gold using an
electrochemically generated hydrogen bubble template is
described. The synthesis procedure induces the formation of
highly active surfaces with enhanced electrocatalytic and
surface enhanced Raman scattering properties.
The fabrication of three dimensional porous materials has been
the subject of significant attention due to their wide-ranging
applications in areas such as sensing,1 electrocatalysis,2
superhydrophobic surfaces,3 and their use as surface
enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates.4 Various
approaches to produce such materials have been employed
such as de-alloying,2,5 galvanic replacement6–8 and using a
variety of organic and hard physical templates.9–11 Often these
methods can be time consuming and complicated, and in the
latter case requires the removal of the template after the
synthesis. Recently, it has been reported that an
electrochemical method can be employed to generate in a
rapid and facile manner 3D copper and silver foam
structures. The method exploits the vigorous hydrogen
evolution that occurs at the electrode surface during the
course of the metal electrodeposition process; the formation
of bubbles both at the surface and on the growing deposit acts
as a template that allows for the formation of high surface area
macroporous foams.3,12–16 The advantage of this approach is
that it is rapid, clean and does not result in any contamination
of the metal surface with organic species.
However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, it has not
been applied to the direct formation of highly porous
honeycomb Au. Indeed, one report claimed that this method
was not applicable to Au.17 Importantly, the applicability of a
Au honeycombmaterial is wide-ranging given the properties of
Au such as biocompatibility and high electrocatalytic and
SERS activity when in the nanostructured form. In this
work, we demonstrate that honeycomb Au structures are
achievable by this hydrogen bubble template method, and
notably that vigorous evolution of hydrogen results in the
formation of highly active metastable states as characterised by
significant Faradaic premonolayer oxide responses which
mediate important electrocatalytic reactions such as glucose
oxidation.
Honeycomb Au films can be achieved from a solution
containing 0.1 to 0.4 M KAuBr4 in aqueous 1.5 M H2SO4. A
150 nm Au substrate prepared by e-beam evaporation onto
quartz was used as the working electrode. In a 3 electrode setup
consisting of a Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a high purity
graphite rod as a counter electrode, Au was electrodeposisted
under constant current density conditions ranging from 1 to
3 A cm�2 for a duration of 5 to 30 s.
Illustrated in Fig. 1 are SEM images of a macroporous Au
structure electrodeposited from a solution containing 0.1 M
KAuBr4 in 1.5 M H2SO4 at a current density of 2 A cm�2 for
30 s. It should be noted that this concentration of H2SO4 was
required to facilitate vigorous hydrogen evolution. It can be
seen from the SEM images that a continuous network of
honeycomb like Au is formed on the substrate (Fig. 1a),
consisting of a layered type structure where the pore size
increases from the bottom to the top of the sample. This is
due to the coalescence of hydrogen bubbles that evolve from
the surface.3 The pore sizes range from 10 to 50 mm in diameter
and the internal wall structure (Fig. 2a) consists of long
dendrites with many branches and nodules where the
backbone tapers to a fine point of around 30 nm. A SEM
image taken at an angle of 451 (Fig. S1, ESIw) indicates clearlythe dendritic nature of the wall structure. The pores are
connected and cross linked, providing a structural integrity
conducive to washing, handling, characterisation and testing.
Fig. 1 SEM images of a honeycomb Au network (a) and a magnified
view of the structure (b). Sample was prepared by depositing at a
current density of 2 A cm�2 for 30 s from a 0.1 M KAuBr4 and 1.5 M
H2SO4 solution.
Fig. 2 (a) SEM image of honeycomb Au deposited at 2 A cm�2 for
30 s from a solution containing 0.1 M KAuBr4 and 1.5 M H2SO4. (b)
XRD of honeycomb Au deposited for 5 s (green), 10 s (blue) and 30 s
(red) at a current density of 2 A cm�2 in 0.1MKAuBr4 in 1.5MH2SO4
normalised to the intensity of the {111} crystal plane.
School of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V,Melbourne, Australia. E-mail: [email protected],[email protected]; Fax: +61 3 99253747;Tel: +61 39925 9940w Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: SEM imagesof honeycomb Au produced at different times and current density andfrom HAuCl4, additional XRD patterns. See DOI: 10.1039/c0cc03696j
COMMUNICATION www.rsc.org/chemcomm | ChemComm
Publ
ishe
d on
01
Nov
embe
r 20
10. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ewca
stle
on
03/0
8/20
13 1
5:08
:05.
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 9182–9184 9183
The effect of electrodeposition time, current density and Au
salt concentration on the macroporous structure was then
investigated and is illustrated by SEM images in Fig. S2–S4
(ESIw). Upon increasing the electrodeposition time from 5 to
30 s, at a concentration of 0.1 M for KAuBr4 in 1.5 M H2SO4,
and a current density of 2 A cm�2, a gradual increase in the
overall integrity of the macroporous structure can be seen (Fig. S2,
ESIw). The internal wall structure also changes from highly
branched fern like dendrites to more elongated rods with
smaller secondary nodules. The effect of applied current
density, while keeping the time constant at 10 s, is also
similar with a more interpenetrating and better formed
porous honeycomb structure being formed at the higher
current density of 3 A cm�2 (Fig. S3, ESIw). Finally,
increasing the KAuBr4 concentration to 0.4 M results in a
less well defined homogeneous macroporous honeycomb
morphology (Fig. S4, ESIw). Indeed large clumps of Au ca.
250 mm in diameter (Fig. S4b, ESIw) appear across the sample.
Overall, it appears there is a competing process between the
rate of Au electrodeposition and the evolution of hydrogen
bubbles from the evolving electrodeposit which needs to be
tuned for homogeneous formation of micron sized pores.
The XRD patterns for this type of material are shown in
Fig. 2b. It can be seen that the characteristic peaks due to fcc
Au, such as the {111}, {200}, {220}, {311} and {222} facets, are
present. However, when analysed as a function of deposition
time at constant current density an increase can be seen for the
relative ratio in intensity of the higher surface energy facets
{200}, {220} and {311} to the lower surface energy {111} facet.
This effect was also observed as a function of gold salt
concentration (Fig. S5a, ESIw) and current density (Fig. S5b,
ESIw). This enhancement may be due to the increased
elongated growth of the branches of the internal walls, where
such facets more readily occur at sharp edges, corners and
protuberances as reported recently for silver nanomaterials.18
In the synthesis of gold nanomaterials hexadecyltrimethy-
lammonium bromide (CTAB) is a routinely used growth
directing agent.19 Previous studies showed that Br� ions
adsorb strongly to specific crystalline faces of Au,20 and there-
fore during the electrodeposition process the liberated Br� ions
through the reaction, AuBr4�+3e�-Au0+ 4Br�, may also
influence the growth pattern of Au by preferential adsorption
on specific Au planes, resulting in the observed elongated
growth. Similar experiments were carried out using HAuCl4(Fig. S6, ESIw) where the internal wall structure consists of
shorter rods, which strongly indicates the role that Br� ions
play in the synthesis. The overall dendritic nature of the
honeycomb structure is most likely related to the
electrodeposition being carried out under non-equilibrium
conditions which favours the formation of dendrites.21,22
The presence of high surface energy facets such as the {311}
crystal plane in particular and a highly nanostructured
material may be significant for the electrocatalytic and SERS
properties of these materials.18,23 The electrochemical
behaviour of these Au honeycomb substrates was
characterised by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in 1 M H2SO4 and
1 M NaOH (Fig. 3). It can be seen for samples synthesised at
different times that a clear increase in electrochemically active
surface area, as noted by the increase in magnitude of the
monolayer oxide reduction peak at 0.90 V (Fig. 3a), is achieved
that is significantly higher than the unmodified substrate (a 168
fold increase at the 30 s electrodeposition time). When the
double layer region is analysed (�0.20 to 0.70 V) it can be seen
that there are oxidation responses at 0.08 and 0.36 V which are
at significantly lower potentials than the onset of Au2O3 oxide
formation at 1.20 V, which have been shown by Bond et al. to
be Faradaic in nature.24 Under alkaline conditions these
responses are more evident (distinct oxidation responses are
at �0.82, �0.39, �0.17, 0.03 and 0.15 V) as they have been
postulated by Burke to be due to Au*/Au hydrous oxide
transitions, where Au* is the active state of Au (Fig. 3b).
The enhanced and more reversible nature of the responses in
base are due to the greater stability of hydrous oxides in the
presence of a large concentration of OH� ions.24–26 These type
of responses have been observed for Au that has been activated
by prolonged severe cathodic polarisation in the hydrogen
evolution region (5–60 min),24,25,27–29 thermal30 and recently
by sonochemical pretreatment.31 In the former case the active
state is induced by the disruption of the outer layers of Au to
create low co-ordinated sites or clusters in a mechanism akin to
hydrogen embrittlement32 which are easier to oxidise than fully
lattice stabilised bulk Au atoms. Significantly, during the
synthesis method employed here such active sites are induced
in a much shorter time period of 5–30 s. Importantly, the
magnitude of these active state responses increases with
electrodeposition time. This may have significance given that
they have been postulated to mediate electrocatalytic oxidation
reactions.24,29
This hypothesis was then tested for glucose oxidation under
alkaline conditions (Fig. 3c). It can be seen that the current is
markedly higher than that achieved at the unmodified
Au surface and increases with the surface area of the sample.
The onset potential of �0.78 V coincides with that of a
Au*/hydrous oxide transition in the absence of glucose
(Fig. 3b). A significant further increase in the response is
Fig. 3 CVs of unmodified Au (black) and honeycomb Au deposited
for 5 s (green), 10 s (blue) and 30 s (red) in (a) 1 M H2SO4, (b) 1 M
NaOH and (c) 20 mM glucose in 1 M NaOH. (d) SERS spectra of
rhodamine B (Raman spectrum of the powder (brown)).
Publ
ishe
d on
01
Nov
embe
r 20
10. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ewca
stle
on
03/0
8/20
13 1
5:08
:05.
View Article Online
9184 Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 9182–9184 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
seen at �0.40 V (oxidation to gluconate), which also coincides
with such a transition and supports this electrocatalytic
mechanism. However, when the data are normalised for
surface area it can be seen that there is some reduction in the
specific activity of the material. This may be related to over
oxidation of the active state at the highest surface area material
which competes with the electro-oxidation of glucose. This
highlights the role that not only surface area but also the
tendency of the surface towards facile oxidation plays in
electrocatalytic reactions, as discussed in detail previously.26
This may also have significant impact on the application of Cu
and Ag materials fabricated in this way.21,22
It has been shown previously that anisotropic Au is an
extremely effective substrate material for SERS.23,33–35 The
honeycomb structure presented here shows considerable
anisotropic growth within the wall structure and was
therefore tested for SERS activity. Illustrated in Fig. 3d is
the Raman signal of Rhodamine B powder and the SERS
signal for Rhodamine B on an unmodified and honeycomb Au
substrates prepared by immersing the sample in an aqueous 1
mMRhodamine B solution for 1 h and then washed with water
to remove any non-adsorbed dye. It can be seen that there is no
observable signal at an unmodified Au substrate but a
significant enhancement (enhancement factor of 104
conservatively estimated for the sample prepared at 5 s—see
ESIw) is observed at the Au honeycomb substrate. The sharp
tips at the end of the dendritic branches and secondary nodules
growing out from the main trunk of each dendrite provide
many sites for local electromagnetic field enhancement or the
lightning rod effect36 to occur. Theoretical studies show that
materials with sharp tips may have a localised electric field
value as high as 500 times that of the applied field.35 It is also
known that nanometre sized gaps provide very large
enhancements in the electromagnetic field, generating
significantly improved SERS signals.37 The extensive
crossover of dendritic branches throughout this material may
provide such sites where the dye is immobilised in nanometre
gaps between these branches, thereby contributing to the SERS
signal. This effect was reported recently for honeycomb Au
fabricated by angle resolved nanosphere lithography.38 The
SERS signal intensity from all samples was significant which
indicates that it is the internal wall structure and overlap of
nanometre sized features, rather than the overall macroporous
structure, which is mainly responsible for the enhancement.
The signal intensity was also homogeneous with a relative
standard of deviation of 10%.
In summary, a rapid method for the direct production of
macroporous honeycomb Au using an electrochemically
induced hydrogen bubble template has been described. The
presence of high surface energy crystal facets and active sites as
indicated by extensive hydrous oxide formation controls the
electrocatalytic activity while the formation of an anisotropic
internal wall structure with protruding sharp tips facilitates
good SERS activity. The significant presence of highly active
sites may also play a role in the application of other metals like
Ag and Cu fabricated in this way.
Notes and references
1 S. Cherevko and C.-H. Chung, Talanta, 2010, 80, 1371.2 J. Zhang, P. Liu, H. Ma and Y. Ding, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111,10382.
3 Y. Li, W.-Z. Jia, Y.-Y. Song and X.-H. Xia, Chem. Mater., 2007,19, 5758.
4 L. Y. Chen, L. Zhang, T. Fujita andM.W. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C,2009, 113, 14195.
5 J. Snyder, K. Livi and J. Erlebacher, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2008,155, C464.
6 J. Chen, B. Wiley, J. McLellan, Y. Xiong, Z. Y. Li and Y. Xia,Nano Lett., 2005, 5, 2058.
7 V. Bansal, H. Jani, J. Du Plessis, P. J. Coloe and S. K. Bhargava,Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 717.
8 V. Bansal, A. P. O’Mullane and S. K. Bhargava, Electrochem.Commun., 2009, 11, 1639.
9 S. Tominaka, C.-W. Wu, T. Momma, K. Kuroda and T. Osaka,Chem. Commun., 2008, 2888.
10 G. S. Attard, P. N. Bartlett, N. R. B. Coleman, J. M. Elliott,J. R. Owen and J. H. Wang, Science, 1997, 278, 838.
11 T.-Y. Shin, S.-H. Yoo and S. Park, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 5682.12 H. C. Shin, J. Dong and M. Liu, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 1610.13 N. Nikolic, K. Popov, L. Pavlovic and M. Pavlovic, J. Solid State
Electrochem., 2007, 11, 667.14 J.-H. Kim, R.-H. Kim and H.-S. Kwon, Electrochem. Commun.,
2008, 10, 1148.15 N. D. Nikolic, G. Brankovic, M. G. Pavlovic and K. I. Popov,
J. Electroanal. Chem., 2008, 621, 13.16 S. Cherevko, X. Xing and C.-H. Chung, Electrochem. Commun.,
2010, 12, 467.17 Y. Li, Y.-Y. Song, C. Yang and X.-H. Xia, Electrochem. Commun.,
2007, 9, 981.18 L. Xuanhua, W. Jin, Z. Yongxing, L. Mingqiang and L. Jinhuai,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2010, 1806.19 J. Perez-Juste, I. Pastoriza-Santos, L. M. Liz-Marzan and
P. Mulvaney, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2005, 249, 1870.20 X. G. Zhang, X. H. Li and H. L. Li, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2001,
234, 68.21 W. Ye, J. Yan, Q. Ye and F. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114,
15617.22 Y. Qin, Y. Song, N. Sun, N. Zhao, M. Li and L. Qi, Chem. Mater.,
2008, 20, 3965.23 B. Plowman, S. J. Ippolito, V. Bansal, Y. M. Sabri,
A. P. O’Mullane and S. K. Bhargava, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5039.24 B. Lertanantawong, A. P. O’Mullane, W. Surareungchai,
M. Somasundrum, L. D. Burke and A. M. Bond, Langmuir,2008, 24, 2856.
25 L. D. Burke, J. M. Moran and P. F. Nugent, J. Solid StateElectrochem., 2003, 7, 529.
26 A. P. O’Mullane, S. J. Ippolito, Y. M. Sabri, V. Bansal andS. K. Bhargava, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 3845.
27 L. D. Burke, A. P. O’Mullane, V. E. Lodge and M. B. Mooney,J. Solid State Electrochem., 2001, 5, 319.
28 L. D. Burke and J. F. O’Sullivan, Electrochim. Acta, 1992, 37, 585.29 L. D. Burke, Gold Bull., 2004, 37, 125.30 L. D. Burke, L. M. Hurley, V. E. Lodge and M. B. Mooney,
J. Solid State Electrochem., 2001, 5, 250.31 Y.-H. Lee, G. Kim, M. Joe, J.-H. Jang, J. Kim, K.-R. Lee and
Y.-U. Kwon, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 5656.32 P. D. Cobden, B. E. Nieuwenhuys, V. V. Gorodetskii and
V. V. Parmon, Platinum Met. Rev., 1998, 43, 141.33 E. Hao, G. Schatz and J. Hupp, J. Fluoresc., 2004, 14, 331.34 B. K. Jena and C. R. Raj, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 3546.35 K. L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L. L. Zhao and G. C. Schatz, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2003, 107, 668.36 N. Tian, Z.-Y. Zhou, S.-G. Sun, L. Cui, B. Ren and Z.-Q. Tian,
Chem. Commun., 2006, 4090.37 M. Schmelzeisen, Y. Zhao, M. Klapper, K. Mullen andM. Kreiter,
ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 3309.38 T. Z. Melvin, et al., Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, 455301.
Publ
ishe
d on
01
Nov
embe
r 20
10. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
ewca
stle
on
03/0
8/20
13 1
5:08
:05.
View Article Online