+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Hongbo Hu ( [email protected]) For Tibet AS collaboration

Hongbo Hu ( [email protected]) For Tibet AS collaboration

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: lave
View: 44 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
A Northern Sky Survey for Both TeV CR anisotropy and -ray Sources with Tibet Air Shower Array. Hongbo Hu ( [email protected]) For Tibet AS  collaboration. The Tibet AS-gamma Experiment ; Two Analyses Methods; Preliminary Results; Discussion and Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
13
A Northern Sky Survey for Both TeV CR anisotropy and - ray Sources with Tibet Air Shower Array Hongbo Hu ([email protected]) For Tibet AS collaboration The Tibet AS-gamma Experiment ; Two Analyses Methods; Preliminary Results; Discussion and Conclusions. 2004.8 Institute of High Energy Physics
Transcript
Page 1: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

A Northern Sky Survey for Both TeV CR anisotropy and -ray Sources

with Tibet Air Shower Array

Hongbo Hu

([email protected])

For Tibet AS collaboration

• The Tibet AS-gamma Experiment ;• Two Analyses Methods;• Preliminary Results;• Discussion and Conclusions.

2004.8 Institute of High Energy Physics

Page 2: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

YangBaJing Observatory and its Experiments

– Located at an elevation of 4300 m (Yangbajing , China)

– Atmospheric depth 606g/cm2

– Wide field of view– High duty cycle (>90%)

ARGOExperimentalHall

ASγ air shower array

Page 3: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

3,600m2 (in area)Tibet-HD Tibet array: ~250 x 250 m2

HD: 60 x 60m2

Tibet-III: ~150x150 m2

Tibet-III

Tibet-HD

Operation Time

Live TimeSelected

EventsMode Energy

Resolution (@3TeV) Area

Tibet-HD

1997.2~1999.9 555.9 days 1.5×109 ~3TeV 0.9o 3600m2

Tibet-III 1999.11~2001.5 456.8 days 5.5×109 ~3TeV 0.9o 22050m2

Tibet Air Shower Array

Page 4: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Method I -----Equal-zenith method Zenith

North Pole

On-source

Off-source

6.8°<zenith<40.0°

10

10

1* i OFFBG

iN

N

• Making use of the fact that events are uniformly distributed within equal-zenith belt;

• 10 off-source windows (side band) are chosen to estimate BKG.

Page 5: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

, on onI N on

on

NI

Equal !

, off offI N off

off

NI

Method II----Global CR. Intensity fitting method

2

, ,2, 2

2 2, ,

1

1

on on off i off ii i

t on

on on off i off ii i

N I N I

N I N I

2 2,

,total i t on

t on

I

Zenith

Equal ?

All sky survey based on an anisotropy correction of relative CR intensity, which is obtained by LSQ fitting for the data in each of equal zenith ring

Page 6: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Tail-in and Loss-cone

DEC

RA.Duldig, PASA,Vol18,No.1

~±0.1%

Large scale anisotropy (by method II) I - 1

Page 7: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Large scale anisotropy of diff. Data sample

• Anisotropy measurements agree with each other from using HD detector or TibetIII detector, means small systematic effects.

Page 8: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Large scale anisotropy correction

σ=1.258

Before subtraction

After subtraction

σ=1.018

Page 9: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

0

0

 

Sky Map

NO. R.A.(˚) DEC(˚) Signifi(σ) NO. R.A.(˚) R.A.(˚) Signifi(σ)

1 38.9 13.9 4.2 13 221.6 32.8 4.4

2 39.2 31.9 4.0 14 253.2 58.8 4.1

3 66.8 12.3 4.1 15 278.3 38.4 4.3

4* 70.1 11.9 4.6 16* 286.7 5.6 4.6

5 70.4 18.0 4.3 17 301.7 8.7 4.1

6 71.9 47.5 4.0 18* 304.3 36.7 4.2

7 78.9 18.9 4.2 19 309.5 49.1 4.4

8* 83.3 21.8 5.0 20 309.9 39.6 4.5

9* 88.8 30.2 5.6 21 318.0 40.6 4.7

10* 115.3 17.5 4.1 22 330.3 50.3 4.0

11* 165.5 38.4 5.3 23 333.0 34.7 4.0

12 199.9 29.7 4.0 24 336.9 12.7 4.0

Crab

Mrk421 List of sky cells with clustered directions (24)having statistic significance larger

than 4.0σ.

(88.8,30.2)

Page 10: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Discussion Hot point I ---evt. No.9 (88.8°, 30.2 °)

SNR counterpart G179.0+2.6,

RA : 88.42 DEC :31.08 Size (/arc min): 70 Type: Shell

3.7σ 4.5 σ

5.6 σ

b=+5˚

b=0˚

b=-5˚

b=+5˚

b=+5˚

b=0˚

b=0˚

b=-5˚

b=-5˚

Page 11: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Hot Point II -- No.18(304.3 °, 36.7 °), No19(309.9 °, 39.6 °)

• Amenomori,in Proc.27th ICRC,2315. Observed 4.15 σ;

• S.W. Cui and C.T. Yan, in Proc. 28th ICRC, 2315. Observed 4 σ; EGRET counterpart 3EG J2016+3657 RA :304.008 DEC : 37.2 Milagro (306.6,38.9) 4.2 σ (Atkins,R., et al 2004, ApJ, 608,680)

~0 σ

4.2 σ

b=+5˚b=0˚

b=-5˚

b=+5˚b=0˚

b=-5˚

b=+5˚b=0˚

b=-5˚

3.9 σ

4.4 σ

4.5 σ

2.9 σ

Page 12: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Up flux limit (by method I)

(30 degree of declination related to YBJ zenith direction)

Page 13: Hongbo Hu  ( huhb@ihep.ac) For Tibet AS  collaboration

Conclusions

• Large scale anisotropy of CR. intensity with a magnitude about 0.1% are observed in two dimensions in TeV energy range.

• Crab and Mrk421 are detected with 5 σ level.

• No other significant point source is found, and an upper-flux limit curve is given


Recommended