1
Hope Cooper Executive Director Director of Community Corrections Services
Kansas Sentencing Commission Kansas Department of Corrections www.kansas.gov/ksc www.dc.state.ks.us
Kevin Smith
Assistant Staff Development Manager Kansas Department of Corrections
The content of this presentation was partially funded by
Bureau of Justice Statistics Grant 2009-BJ-CX-K051
SB 123 STAFF
Kansas Sentencing Commission Janice Brasher, Fiscal Director
Jennifer Dalton, Accountant
2
Kansas Department of Corrections Gert Cozadd, Staff Development Specialist
Terrell Brooks, Staff Development Specialist
Lisa Copeland, Skill Developer
Vickie Brungardt, Program Consultant
Dustin Karr, Program Consultant
Talia Labouchardiere, Program Consultant
Ron McVeigh, Auditor
Carolyn Eckhardt, Accountant
Please turn cell phones off
Water/Restrooms
Sign-in Sheet
Break
3
Legislative Updates
Case Law
Expenditures
Overview of duties and responsibilities
Offender Reimbursement
Treatment Provider File Review Information
Assessments
Program Data (from TOADS)
Training Report
Questions, Answers and Discussion
4
5
www.kslegislature.org
HOUSE BILL 2668
Criminal Code Recodification
No substantive changes, but clean-up in statute order,
codification of case law, and clarification of present
language
Expect new statute numbers for existing crimes
Effective July 1, 2011
6
2011 AMENDMENTS TO
2010 HB 2668
2011 SESSION LAWS
7
2003 SB 123 OPERATIONS MANUAL IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND WILL
BE AVAILABLE ON OUR WEB SITE SOON
SB 123 STATUTE #’S HAVE CHANGED…
2008 2009
(HB 2236)
2010 2011
(HB 2668)
65-4160 21-36a06 21-36a06 21-5706
65-4162 21-36a06 21-36a06 21-5706
8
21-5706(a) (c)(1)
Drugs; Possession of opiates, opium or narcotic drugs, or any stimulant designated in
subsection (d)(1), (d)(3) or (f)(1) of K.S.A. 65-4107 or controlled substance analog [Formerly
K.S.A. 21-36a06(a)]
21-5706(b)(1) (c)(2) Drugs; Possession of depressant or analog; [Formerly K.S.A. 21-36a06(b)(1)]
21-5706(b)(2) (c)(2) Drugs; Possession of stimulant or analog; [Formerly K.S.A. 21-36a06(b)(2)]
21-5706(b)(3) (c)(2) Drugs; Possession of hallucinogenic or analog; [Formerly K.S.A. 21-36a06(b)(3)]
21-5706(b)(4) (c)(2)
Drugs; Possession of substance or analog designated in subsection (g) of K.S.A. 65-4105 or
subsection (c), (d), (e), (f) or (g) of K.S.A. 65-4111; [Formerly K.S.A. 21-36a06(b)(4)]
21-5706(b)(5) (c)(2) Drugs; Possession of anabolic steroid or analog; [Formerly K.S.A. 21-36a06(b)(5)]
21-5706(b)(7) (c)(2) Drugs; Possession of any substance or analog designated in subsection (h) of K.S.A. 65-4105
CASE LAW
STATE V. PERRY-COUTCHER – May 6, 2011 - Shawnee District
Court ,No. 104,222 . Perry-Coutcher convicted of attempted
possession of opiates. Sentence included completion of a community
corrections drug treatment program pursuant to K.S.A. 2011 Supp.
21-6824 (formerly 21-4729). A conviction for an attempt to
commit a crime under K.S.A. 21-3301 is not covered in K.S.A.
2011 Supp. 21-6824 (formerly 21-4729). District court thus erred
in ordering Perry-Coutcher to complete mandatory drug treatment
under K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-6824 (formerly 21-4729).
9
Please be aware that the State payment processing system will be down in July every year.
The KSC encourages providers to bill for the first part of June, so that providers will receive payment for services sooner rather than later.
Expect payment delays due to backlog and process adjustments.
A letter goes out in June every year reminding providers of this shut down.
Thanks for your patience and understanding!
10
Revocations to prison are down 12.2% in comparing the pre and post SB 123 groups.
The average underlying prison sentence of this group was 15.3 months.
Prison beds have been reserved for more serious and violent offenders
The expenditure amounts for the past three years has been decreasing.
The number of offenders receiving assessment and treatment has declined.
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Expenditure $ 8,091,060 $ 7,467,859 $ 7,208,273
Yearly Difference $ (972,240) $ (623,201) $ (259,586)
% Difference -11% -8% -3%
Services FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Assessment & Tx # Offenders 2403 2193 2073
Tx Only # Offenders 2069 1906 1808
Assessment & Tx Chg # Offenders -210 -120
Tx Only Chg # Offenders -163 -98
Assessment & Tx % Difference -9% -5%
Tx Only % Difference -8% -5%
DIRECT PRISON ADMISSION REDUCTION
CRIMINAL HISTORY “E” TO “I”
Fiscal Year # Offenders
2004 30
2005 68
2006 84
2007 100
2008 89
2009 74
2010 59
504 Reduction in cases between the Pre- SB
123 and the Post- SB 123 groups.
DIRECT PRISON ADMISSION REDUCTION
CRIMINAL HISTORY “A” TO “D”
Fiscal Year # Offenders
2004 55
2005 47
2006 49
2007 51
2008 78
2009 50
2010 76
406 Reduction in cases between the Pre- SB
123 and the Post- SB 123 groups.
DRUG POSSESSION SENTENCES:
REVOCATION RATE TO PRISON
Sentencing Type
Fiscal Yr
# Drug Possession Probation Sentences
# Drug Possession Probation Sentences-Revoked to
Prison
% Revoked to Prison
% Diff
D4 2010 623 284 45.6%
SB 123 2010 1056 216 20.5% -25.1%
D4 2011 596 227 38.1%
SB 123 2011 975 181 18.6% -19.5%
COST BENEFIT –BED AVOIDANCE
FY 2004-FY 2010
Fiscal
Year
SB 123
Expenditure
Money
Collected
Actual SB123
Cost
Prison Cost
Avoidance
Estimated
Money Saved
2004 $ 998,468 $ 15,948 $ 982,520 $ 2,525,000 $ (1,542,480)
2005 $ 5,106,505 $ 150,220 $ 4,956,281 $ 6,150,000 $ (1,193,719)
2006 $ 7,861,395 $ 213,589 $ 7,647,807 $ 8,325,000 $ (677,193)
2007 $ 8,642,250 $ 202,854 $ 8,439,395 $ 8,875,000 $ (435,604)
2008 $ 8,640,578 $ 229,649 $ 8,410,929 $ 9,875,000 $ (1,464,071)
2009 $ 7,677,082 $ 382,769 $ 7,294,313 $ 8,450,000 $ (1,155,687)
2010 $ 7,450,263 $ 405,708 $ 7,044,555 $ 8,650,000 $ (1,605,445)
Total $46,376,541 $1,600,741 $44,775,799 $ 52,850,000 $ (8,074,200)
The following table displays the direct cost and benefit of SB 123 by fiscal year.
Since the implementation of SB 123, this policy has saved the State an estimated
total of $8 millions.
Summary of expenditure activity for all years
Change in the number of offenders receiving
treatment verses expenditure amount
Review of Modality Usage
16
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURE DATA
(PAYMENT DATABASE, TPPS)
NOVEMBER 2003 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2011
Total Offenders (assessment & treatment) ....…………………………..9,131
Offenders with treatment only……............……………………………7,810
Total number of invoices paid ......................………………………….83,370
Avg cost per offender for assessment & treatment
*treatment up to 18 months ………..…………………….. …………….$6,820
Avg cost per offender for treatment only
* treatment up to 18 months ……..………………..…………………….$6,633
Expenditure for assessment & treatment ………………………..$53,466,804
Expenditure for treatment only .......................………………….$51,802,529
Annualized TX & Assessment avg cost per offender…………… …. ……..$3,934
Annualized TX cost Avg per offender…...………………………………..$3,746
ANNUAL EXPENDITURES AND % OF CHANGE
FY 2005 FY 2006
FY 2007 FY 2008
FY 2009 FY 2010
FY 2011
$4,911,113
$7,782,911 $9,276,336
$9,063,300
$8,091,060
$7,467,859 $7,208,273
58% 19%
-2% -11%
-8%
-3%
SB 123 Annual Expenditure & % Change
Exp Amt % Diff per Yr
TABLE COMPARING PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN
THE NUMBER OF OFFENDERS VS. COSTS
Fiscal Yr % chg
Expenditures % chg #
Offenders
FY 2008 0% 0%
FY 2009 -11% -10%
FY 2010 -3% -8%
FY 2011 -5% -5%
CHANGE PER FISCAL YEAR IN THE NUMBER OF
OFFENDERS-TREATMENT ONLY
Following table shows a decline for the last three years
Fiscal Yr # Offenders
FY 2005 941
FY 2006 2,055 1,114 118%
FY 2007 2,291 236 11%
FY 2008 2,301 10 0.44%
FY 2009 2,069 (232) -10%
FY 2010 1,906 (163) -8%
FY 2011 1,808 (98) -5%
Offender
Difference % Change
Review of Modalities from
Payment Database
21
OFFENDER MODALITY USAGE TOTALS
AND USAGE BY FISCAL YEARS
Modality
FY 2010 #
Offenders
FY 2011 #
Offenders
#
Offender
Diff
% diff in #
offenders
SB 123-SASSI, MH screening,
etc 1044 1028 -16 -2%
3rd ASI 53 37 -16 -30%
Social Detox 41 44 3 7%
Therapeutic Community 13 18 5 38%
Intermediate/Residential 506 496 -10 -2%
Re-Integration 233 223 -10 -4%
Outpatient Individual 1215 1197 -18 -1%
Outpatient Group 1224 1159 -65 -5%
Intensive Outpatient 531 491 -40 -8%
Outpatient Family 6 3 -3 -50%
Relapse Prevention 597 558 -39 -7%
Inpatient
Outpatient
Assessments
23
TREATMENT PROVIDERS REQUIREMENTS
Treatment providers are required to obtain KDOC certification. (see Chapter 5 of the 2003 SB 123 Operation Manual).
Kansas state licensing or certification requirements needed to provide drug and alcohol abuse treatment.
All counselors must be under a licensed provider.
24
TREATMENT PROVIDERS REQUIREMENTS (CONT.)
The substance abuse treatment counselor shall be a co-
participant with the supervising Community Corrections
Officer (includes Team Meetings)
Apply for and collect insurance when applicable
Certified drug abuse treatment providers are identifiable
through the Total Offender Activity Documentation System
(TOADS)
25
RESPONSIBILITIES OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Initiation and monitoring of contracts with treatment/assessment providers
Supervision of offenders
Team meetings
Intervention information in TOADS
Approval and Submission of Invoices
Certify treatment providers (DOC)
Monitor offender reimbursement
26
RESPONSIBILITIES OF KSC ARE TO:
Provide a centralized payment system
Process invoices for payment
Enter and track all expenditures and receipts
Serve as a resource to stakeholders
Prepare budget and track funding allocations and balances
Notify stakeholders of revisions or changes to program policies or the manual
Conduct required evaluations
27
INVOICE SUBMISSION
Treatment providers send signed invoices to
Community Corrections for approval, signatures of
supervising officer and community corrections officer.
Community corrections then sends approved and
signed invoice to KSC.
28
INVOICE SUBMISSION (CONTINUED)
KSC verifies that modality, case information and demographic
data has been entered in TOADS through the data system and
that the dates match.
KSC verifies that the cost is within cost caps and provider
agreements.
29
KSC reviews each invoice for complete information and
correct calculations.
KSC must reject invoices with incomplete or incorrect
information.
30
INVOICE SUBMISSION (CONTINUED)
Community Corrections Summary
Insurance Receipt Summary
31
OFFENDER REIMBURSEMENTS
Court should order reimbursement as part of sentence K.S.A.
75-52,144(d)
Included in the journal entry of sentencing:
(Page 3, Section V, Costs Ordered): SB 123 Offender
Reimbursement (at least $300) $_____
Judges have been notified of this recommendation
To view the report- www.kansas.gov/ksc
SB123 section:
Report of the Subcommittee on Offender Reimbursement for Assessment and
Treatment Pursuant to 2003 SB 123 to the 2010 House Committee on
Corrections and Juvenile Justice
32
OFFENDER REIMBURSEMENTS
Court/community corrections determine the reimbursement
amount.
Forward Offender Reimbursements on to the Kansas
Sentencing Commission.
Money orders from the offenders or checks from Community
Corrections or courts are preferred.
Submit with a completed Offender Reimbursement form.
33
OFFENDER REIMBURSEMENT REMITTANCE FORM
2003-SB 123
This form is to accompany ALL remittance whether by Community Corrections or directly from individual
Mail to: Kansas Sentencing Commission
700 SW Jackson, Ste 501
Topeka, KS 66603
Community Correction Agency Name:
If payment is submitted by the Community Correction Agency
Name of Offender:
If payment is submitted directly by offender
Total Amount Paid: Date:
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Payment Information:
SB 123 Client Name
Last Name First
Name
KDOC
Number
Court Case
Number
County Community
Corrections
Amount Paid
Enter the information for one individual or several as applies.
Comments: 34
OFFENDER REIMBURSEMENT LAST 4 YEARS
FY Reimbursement
Amount
# of Unique
Offenders
FY 2008 $ 69,777 304
FY 2009 $ 75,374 341
FY 2010 $ 98,894 437
FY 2011 $ 128,280 518
35
COMPARISON OF REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNTS
LAST 4 YEARS
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Reimbursement Amount
Reimbursement Amount
TREND SHOWING THE NUMBER OF OFFENDERS
PAYING-LAST 4 YEARS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
# of Unique Offenders
# Offenders
SB 123- INSURANCE RECEIPTS AND COLLECTION
COMPARISON
FY Amt AmtChg $ % Chg
#Offenders
Ins Pd Amt Chg % Chg
2004 13,828.00$ 3
2005 123,141.00$ 109,313.00$ 791% 42 39 1333%
2006 301,577.00$ 178,436.00$ 145% 82 40 86%
2007 142,869.00$ (158,708.00)$ -53% 67 -15 -16%
2008 157,971.00$ 15,102.00$ 11% 70 3 4%
2009 313,517.00$ 155,546.00$ 98% 96 26 37%
2010 291,692.00$ (21,825.00)$ -7% 98 2 2%
2011 193,679.00$ (98,013.00)$ -34% 63 -35 -36%
39
SERVICE UTILIZATION FILE REVIEW
Service dates for this review:
June 2007-November 2009
Review specifics:
Number of Providers 41
Number of Offenders 48
Number of Records 68
40
SB 123 File Review Results to Date
Assessment 98% of the records reviewed show that assessment
information supported the diagnosis through citation of
criteria and supported the level of care.
Treatment Plan 95% of the records reviewed shows that the treatment plans
reflect issues/problems identified and that the plan was
updated at appropriate intervals.
41
•93% of clients received the appropriate amount of clinical services for the level of care. •87% of the providers documented coordination of care with offender’s ISO. •100% of files reviewed show that the documentation justifies ongoing treatment at the specified level of care. •94% of the files show that mental health issues were addressed during the course of treatment. (52%) of offenders were identified with mental health issues.
•77% of the files show documentation of Team Meetings.
Program Content
42
Discharge Planning:
84% of the files had formulated a discharge plan.
98% of the files addressed relapse prevention.
98% of files reviewed addressed the need for follow-up
services.
43
DISCHARGE TYPE
Successful 56%
Not Discharged 4%
Transferred 9%
Unknown 3%
Unsuccessful 28%
44
KSC SUMMARY OF SB 123 OFFENDERS
RECEIVED ASSESSMENTS
ASSESSMENTS
Assessments required by SB 123
Level of Services Inventory – Revised LSI-R
Pre-sentence
Re-assessment
Discharge
SB 123 Assessment
Pre-Sentence
ASI
1st ASI within 30 days start of treatment
2nd ASI at treatment discharge
3rd ASI at least 6 months after discharge
46
SB 123 ASSESSMENT REPORTS
As of June 30, 2011, KSC received SB 123 assessment
reports of 8,860 offenders, among which,
32 (0.4%) were from FY 2004,
1,390 (15.7%) were from FY 2005,
1,546 (17.4%) were from FY 2006,
1,317 (14.9) were from FY 2007,
1,305 (14.7%) were from FY 2008,
1,164 (13.1%) were from FY 2009,
1,085 (12.2%) were from FY 2010 and
1,021 (11.5%) were from FY 2011.
SB 123 OFFENDERS RECEIVED ASSESSMENTS
BY COMMUNITY CORRECTION - 1
Community Corrections FY 04-05 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total
2nd Judicial District C.C. 10 11 11 13 4 4 14 67
4th Judicial District C.C. 64 43 45 28 30 23 22 255
5th Judicial District C.C. 58 43 29 25 18 18 19 210
6th Judicial District C.C. 9 27 15 15 10 13 14 103
8th Judicial District C.C. 63 83 76 64 60 49 31 426
11th Judicial District C. C. 60 33 25 32 26 21 33 230
12th Judicial District C. C. 2 12 1 0 11 3 6 35
13th Judicial District C.C. 20 37 23 17 27 25 20 169
22nd Judicial District C.C. 28 19 22 17 17 14 15 132
24th Judicial District C C. 31 6 8 13 4 5 16 83
25th Judicial District C.C. 33 21 25 38 21 17 17 172
28th Judicial District C.C. 108 106 71 64 59 65 33 506
31st Judicial District C.C. 47 23 38 48 22 21 19 218
Atchison County C.C. 22 42 19 11 12 16 11 133
Cimarron Basin Authority C.C. 19 24 13 15 17 18 18 124
Central Kansas C.C. 36 35 34 28 37 25 26 221
SB 123 OFFENDERS RECEIVED ASSESSMENTS
BY COMMUNITY CORRECTION - 2
Community Corrections FY 04-05 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total
Cowley County C.C. 39 62 20 27 22 19 29 218
Douglas County C.C. 6 14 22 7 9 9 12 79
Harvey/McPherson County C.C. 70 52 55 52 40 40 46 355
Johnson County C.C. 178 156 159 134 101 69 84 881
Leavenworth County C.C. 11 10 19 35 21 13 7 116
Montgomery County C.C. 33 33 25 24 28 27 28 198
Northwest Kansas C.C. 41 29 19 31 22 15 31 188
Riley County C.C. 24 29 25 38 35 32 9 192
Reno County C.C. 78 80 41 52 52 45 46 394
South Central Kansas C.C. 9 28 12 11 16 16 13 105
Santa Fe Trail C.C. 32 47 51 49 45 18 23 265
Sedgwick County C.C. 153 231 186 184 189 259 184 1386
Shawnee County C.C. 71 111 95 92 59 58 95 581
Sumner County C.C. 0 9 10 7 4 6 5 41
Unified Government C.C. 67 90 123 134 146 122 95 777
Total 1422 1,546 1,317 1,305 1,164 1,085 1,021 8,860
51
53
SB 123 ASSESSMENT COMPONENTS
SB 123 Summary Form
SASSI
Psychiatric Screening of the ASI
Social History
All the above documents must
accompany the invoice for payment of
the SB 123 Assessment
54
55
SASSI III: PROBABILITY OF HAVING A
SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE DISORDER
High, 6025, 70%
Low, 2592, 30%
SASSI III Probability
MENTAL HEALTH SCREEN
REFERRAL
Yes, 2494,
29.0%
No, 6114,
71.0%
Mental Health Screen Referral
SASSI PROFILE SCORES*
Description Number Number of Zero
Score Minimum Maximum Mean
Face Valid Alcohol 8591 1556 0 69 5.6
Face Valid Other Drugs 8592 336 0 84 12.6
Symptoms 8591 533 0 84 4.7
Obvious Attributes 8591 29 0 75 5.8
Subtle Attributes 8590 43 0 66 4.0
Defensiveness 8588 91 0 68 5.6
Supplemental Addiction
Measure 8587 5 0 80 8.1
Family vs. Controls 8462 10 0 70 8.1
Correctional 8460 44 0 72 6.6
* High scores indicate problems.
INITIAL TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
JULY 1, 2007 TO JUNE 30, 2011
Modality Number
Social Detoxification 20
Therapeutic Community 61
Intermediate Residential 659
Day Treatment 2
Intensive Outpatient 1166
Outpatient - Individual 2166
Outpatient - Group 2417
Outpatient - Family 180
Re-Integration/Halfway House Extended Stay 183
Relapse Prevention/Aftercare 1502
Drug Abuse Education 227
60
SB 123 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
• ASI’s are administered (send ALL to the KSC):
1st ASI (All portions of ASI)
Within 30 Days of Treatment Start Date
Paid at the rate of the current modality
2nd at Discharge from Treatment:
Paid at the rate of the current modality
3rd Post-Sentencing at least 6 months after discharge
Paid $100 and submit with accompanying documentation
61
COMPARISON OF THE AVERAGE SEVERITY
RATINGS OF THREE ASI’S BY PROBLEM
Paired Samples T test is applied to test the average
severity rating differences in each problem area.
The tests indicate that most of the differences are
statistically significant at the significance value
less than 0.05.
These results statistically support the purpose of
SB 123 treatment programs.
62
ASI AND SASSI CERTIFICATION
ASI and SASSI administrators MUST BE
certified by Department of Corrections.
65
ASI
KSAAP
785-235-2400
www.ksaap.org
SASSI
The SASSI Institute
1-800-697-2774
www.sassi.com/training.htm
66
LSI-R© ASSESSMENTS
(THROUGH JUNE 30, 2011)
Level of Services Inventory – Revised
Supervision Level
Case Management
Risk of Re-Offense
67
LSI-R©
Risk/Need Assessment Instrument
Identifies:
Risk for Re-offending
Criminogenic Needs (targets for reducing risk)
Instrument frequency:
Prior to sentencing
6 mo. (or a Significant Event)
Discharge
68
LSI-R© ASSESSMENT
As of June 30, 2011, the LSI-R has been administered to
8,969 SB 123 offenders. 6,827 offenders have been
assessed 2 or more times.
The assessments include
9,079 (40.7%) Pre-sentence/Initial LSI-R’s
9,350 (42.0%) Re-assessments and
3,859 (17.3%) Discharge LSI-R’s.
LSI-R© ASSESSMENT (CONT.)
As of June 30, 2011, 22,288 LSI-R’s have been
administered.
Level of Risk/Level of Supervision:
3,326 (14.9%) at ISL I (highest)
6,347 (28.5%) at ISL II
7,193 (32.3%) at ISL III
5,422 (24.3%) at ISL IV (lowest)
PROGRAM DATA
TOADS DATABASE
Sentencing Activity:
SB 123 Court Cases
Program Inception – June 30, 2011
9,641 offenders sentenced in a total of 11,542 SB 123 Cases.
1,901 offenders have 2 or more SB 123 cases.
74
75
76
77
78
Kansas Department of Corrections
Senate Bill 123
SB 123 Skill Training
Certification Report
KDOC Training Responsibilities
Senate Bill 123
Community Corrections
LSI-R and Intro to Cog Tools
Substance Abuse Treatment Providers
CBIT Training
Integration/addendum plan approval
Site visits
KDOC Training Responsibilities
Court Services
Implementation FY 2008
Governor Sebelius 5/2006
Senate Bill 434
“The pre-sentence report will become part of the court record and shall be accessible to the public, except that the official version, defendant’s version and the victim’s statement, any psychological reports, risk and needs assessments and drug and alcohol reports and assessments shall be accessible only to the parties, the sentencing judge, the department of corrections, and if requested, the Kansas sentencing commission. If the offender is committed to the custody of the secretary of corrections, the report shall be sent to the secretary and, in accordance with K.S.A. 75-5220 and amendments thereto to the warden of the state correctional institution to which the defendant is conveyed.”
Senate Bill 434
Certification Process
Cognitive Behavioral Tools
Intervention Training
CBIT
December 5 - 8 Topeka
March 26 - 29 Wichita
June 4 - 8 Topeka
Certification Process
http://www.doc.ks.gov/
KDOC’s web page
Site Visits
Process
Notified by KDOC
Discuss what to expect
Packet is sent
Site Visits
Process
File review
Interview staff/clients
Group observation
Site Visits/Documentation
File Review
SB 123 assessment form
Client placement agreement
Cog restructuring tool
ASI - 30 day and discharge
Post treatment - 6 month
Site Visits/Documentation
Staff Interviews
Relationship with CC Problems/issues with SB 123 Suggestions to improve the process
Site Visits/Documentation
Client Interviews
What have you learned? What tools do you use? How do you practice the skills? What do you like/dislike about the program?
Group facilitation Group management Reflective communication and…
Site Visits/Group Observation
Always assessed on
Cognitive Restructuring Social Skills Problem Solving
Site Visits/Group Observation
At least one of the following
KDOC coordinates results Draft report is written,
reviewed and mailed to the
agency
Post Visit Process
Agency responds Final draft is written and
mailed to the agency
Post Visit Process
SB 123 Staff
Gert Cozadd Kevin Smith
(785) 296-3998 (785) 291-3192
[email protected] [email protected]
Terrell Brooks
(785) 368-7251
Things to Remember
Any changes to the approved
SB 123 integration plan and/or
addendum must be KDOC approved
Things to Remember
Providers are responsible for
notifying KDOC of staffing
changes pertinent to SB 123 in
a timely manner accompanied
with the appropriate and
relative corrections
Things to Remember
Agencies providing SB123 services without a CBT certified counselor are non-compliant
Roster space is reserved based upon the order of training applications received
Kansas Department of Corrections
Senate Bill 123
Questions?
Comments?
