Date post: | 07-Aug-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | danieldeaguiar |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 15
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
1/35
Nature’s Bonfire, Million-fueled: The Poetic Cosmologies of
G. M. Hopins and !. N. "hitehead
#o$ert %. &oud
Pasadena Cit' College
The purpose of this article is to pro(ide suggestions to aid in the critical interpretation
of Gerard Manle' Hopins’ poetr' and (ision of realit' $' comparing some of his focal
ideas )ith those of !lfred North "hitehead. More is at stae in Hopins than the )riting
of poetr' and the in(ention of a Christian poetics. Percei(ing inscapes and feeling
instresses* lies at the heart of the human (ocation of gi(ing glor' to God. The' are part of
a discernment process that deepens and e+tends the )or of t. gnatius o'ola. The' are
part of the poet’s personal pro/ect of finding God in all things.
This article is not so much a$out the poetr' of Hopins, as it is a$out his poetic ideas,
his Christological cosmolog', his (ision of realit', his underl'ing influences and
con(ictions. This article is a fusion of hori0ons $et)een Hopins and "hitehead. t
intends to impro(e the understanding of each $' comparison to and correlation )ith the
other. This leads ine(ita$l' to a $etter understanding of Hopins’ poems, $ut it is not on
the )hole an anal'sis of or commentar' on particular poems. t terminates, ho)e(er, in
an appreciati(e consideration of 1The "indho(er,2 $' )a' of correlation )ith
"hitehead’s notion of concrescence.
*
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
2/35
Hopins does not )rite )ith the accurac' or consistenc' of a philosopher or
theologian, $ut his uni3ue and idios'ncratic terminolog' and conceptualit' tempt the
philosopher and theologian to pro$e his )ors for an underl'ing s'stematic unit'. ome
of the colorful and engaging terms familiar to readers of Hopins are: dappled, inscape,
instress, stress, outstress, selftaste, rhyming, chiming, selving, pitch, sake, scape, interest,
catch, and se(eral others. These terms all seem to ha(e to do )ith the (ariet' of things in
nature, their inner energ', the uni3ue inner pattern each thing has, and the patterned
impression the' $esto) upon the mind )hen communicating )ith it. Humans, )ith
sensation, consciousness, and the a$ilit' to appreciate $eaut', are present in the )orld to
recei(e the impressions gi(en off $' natural o$/ects and $' scenes composed of se(eral
o$/ects in con/unction.
4or Hopins, the accumulation of poetic perceptions, fused )ith the attendant
sufferings and sacrifices re3uired in a particular (ocation, is the tas of the Christian. n
Hopins’ (ie), God’s goodness o(erflo)s into the a$undance of creation, m'steriousl'
re3uiring suffering, $ut promising re)ard $e'ond this life. The neo-Platonic, #omantic,
and 4ranciscan principle of plentitude is important as $acground $ehind Hopins’
delight in the fecund a$undance, differences, (ariet', and uni3ueness in a )orld )hose
deepest structures are imprinted )ith the face of Christ. The )ord dappled 5 is the s'm$ol
in the poem 1Pied Beaut'2 for the profusion and di(ersit' of entities in creation,
suggesting the m'riad of actual entities or actual occasions6 present in the uni(erse at
an' instant in "hitehead’s cosmolog'.
5
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
3/35
Glor' $e to God for dappled things --
4or sies of couple-color as a $rindled co)7
4or rose-moles in all stipple upon trout that s)im . . .
ome of the "hiteheadian or process ideas used here are: creativity, actual entity,
concrescence, prehension, subjective form, initial aim, subjective aim, the reformed
subjectivist principle, the four phases of concrescence, transmutation, and the t)o
natures of God 8 primordial and consequent 9. ome of the comparisons or correlations
)ored out in this article include: creativity in "hitehead )ith instress in Hopins,
concrescence in "hitehead )ith inscape in Hopins, style in "hitehead )ith inscape and
selving in Hopins, selftaste )ith satisfaction, and transmutation in "hitehead )ith
rhyming in Hopins.
Selving corresponds )ith the process $' )hich the initial aim $ecomes the subjective
aim in "hitehead7 it is also closel' related to his reformed subjectivist principle. Sake,; as
used $' Hopins, corresponds to the anticipation an actual entit' entertains or
e+periences as to its inclusion and rele(ance in future concrescences. The term interest <
as used $' Hopins is a function of the )a' in )hich )orldl' occasions $ecome
e(erlasting, or o$/ecti(el' immortal. The' are preser(ed and enhanced in God’s
consequent nature. Rhyming ,= a term also used idios'ncraticall' $' Hopins,
appro+imates to "hitehead’s categor' of transmutation.> #h'ming also suggests the
harmoni0ing of the (er' man' subjective forms or affective tones )ithin each actual
entit'.
6
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
4/35
nfluences on the )or of Hopins include t. gnatius o'ola, t. 4rancis of !ssisi,
&uns cotus, Parmenides, Heraclitus, and the Ne) Testament. "e refer to !rthur ?.
o(e/o'’s The Great Chain of Being for understandings of Plato’s theolog', Neo-
Platonism, the principle of plentitude, and #omanticism. o(e/o' points to the principle
of plentitude@ in #omanticism, and this sho)s up strongl' in Hopins’ appreciation of the
(ariet' of species and indi(iduals, all of )hich ha(e inscapes that are also Christscapes. *A
4or o(e/o', there are notions of fecundit', (ariet' and di(ersit' that connect Platonism
and #omanticism, and pla' important parts in the definition of #omanticism.
i !gnatius, Scotus, and !nscape
The gnatian influence in Hopins is central and per(asi(e. t has to do )ith gi(ing
$ac to God an appreciation for all that God has gi(en to us.** t also has to do )ith
1maing it )orth God’s )hile to ha(e created us.2 *5 Hearing the phrase 1)orth God’s
)hile2 might mae a "hiteheadian thin of 1the conse3uent nature of God,2 *6 that is, the
preser(ing aspect of God to )hich )e mae our constant and uni3ue contri$utions. t is a
metaph'sical condition in "hitehead that all finite achie(ement rushes $ac into God for
e(erlasting preser(ation. There is also an idea of spiritual po(ert' in gnatius, $' )hich
de(otees should gi(e e(er'thing the' possess $ac to God. 1Gi(e $eaut' $ac . . . $ac
to God, $eaut'’s self and $eaut'’s gi(er.2*
Beaut' and glor' are (irtuall' the same for Hopins7 $oth are placed in nature and
destined for return to God, and it is the dut' of humanit' to achie(e the latter. Bo'le
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
5/35
treats of $oth as heinah, the o(ershado)ing presence of God that ho(ers o(er the ar of
the co(enant and o(er Mar' in t. ue’s gospel.*; !mong other places, heinah )as in
the smoe from the censer of the high priest )hich hung o(er the merc' seat in the
temple in erusalem. n the a$$ala, this heinah is associated )ith the re(elator' and
redempti(e descent of God into humanit' as it is created.*
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
6/35
the )orld is also related to a certain hol' indifference, or spiritual li$ert', as regards the
particular circumstances in )hich one is called to ser(e.
4used )ith the gnatian spiritualit' of glor' and sacrifice, )hich is con(erted into a
poetic sensi$ilit' $' Hopins, is the 4ranciscan5* spiritualit' of greeting the image or
(estige of God in all created things, the nearness of God and the gentleness of God’s
lo(ing )ill. t is thus that Hopins resonates )ith the een sense of the indi(idualit' of
the particular, as $ased in the cotist notion of haecceitas.55 This particularit' of each
creature in each no(el circumstance is appreciated in cotus’ haecceitas and in gnatius’
discernment of spirits.
?n the 3uestion of particularit', a "hiteheadian might refer to The "ims of
#ducation,56 )here "hitehead )rites of style as the 1fashioning of po)er, 8and9 the
restraining of po)er.2 n "hitehead, st'le com$ines the aesthetic sense )ith the
foreseeing of ends to $e attained. t'le implies an e+3uisite fit $et)een means of
e+pression and content e+pressed. t'le has to do )ith the appropriate use of creati(e
po)er, )ithout )aste, stinting, or tri(ial application. n "hitehead, po)er is directed,
restrained, and shaped, as it is $rought under the principle of limitation $' the process of
concrescence. o, st'le is not the po)er or energ' itself, $ut the fashioning of po)er as in
concrescence. t'le is nothing if not com$ined )ith self-determination, gi(ing to the
indi(idual its uni3ueness in function and production. t'le )ould then in(ol(e discretion
and discernment in the gnatian sense. "hitehead’s st'le has to do )ith the internal
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
7/35
structure and organi0ation of a thing, the particularit' of a thing’s self-patterning, and
thus corresponds to Hopins inscape or selving
nscape can thus $e characteri0ed as st'le, structure, design, or pattern. !nscape as
structure re(eals instress as the energ' of the thing itself and as the energ' of God in the
act of creating. The m'riad forms of nature are uni3ue, $oth self-inscaped and
indi(iduall' inscaped $' God. %ach thing, from the lo)est piece of inanimate matter to
the most 1highl' pitched, sel(ed and distincti(e2 thing in creation, the human mind, has
its o)n inscape, )hich gi(es it its o)n self or identit'.
"hen Hopins speas of a landscape, seascape, or e(en a lovescape,5 he is speaing
of the e+terior or outer manifestation of something, of )hich the interior, organi0ing
realit' is the inscape. The outer scape sho)s itself to the poet in such a )a' as to re(eal
the inscape and the instress of )hat is $eheld. 4urthermore, this manifestation stirs or
e+cites the poet’s a)areness of his or her personal instress. n a moment of poetic insight,
this contemplation stirs the resonating a)areness of se(eral attuned instances of instress
into intense harmon', called rhyme
ii !nstress as Creativity
!nstress in Hopins is the underl'ing energ' that organi0es nature into pattern and
unit'. nstress also runs through the human mind 8)hich is part of nature9, ena$ling it to
mae sense of the )orld. t underlies all particular inscapes of natural structures, /ust as
the total life and personalit' of the artist lies $ehind an' particular )or of art he or she
=
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
8/35
ma' produce. Dltimatel', this $eing or creati(e po)er must $e a di(ine energ': 1creation
is not altogether a separation, $ut that God remains in things $' his essence, presence,
and po)er, as the inmost $eing of things.25; 4or Hopins, instress is the creati(e energ'
and acti(it' of God )ithin things.
B' contemplation of simple o$/ects E flo)ers, trees, streams, and landscapes E
Hopins )as at times raised to ecstas', $ecause he reali0ed that the hidden energ'
8instress9 molding things into shapes, colors, and patterns 8inscapes9 )as the (er' energ'
of God. This out)ard and (isi$le $eaut' )as to him the reflection of the energ' and
in(isi$le $eaut' of God. o, in this sense all of nature )as sacramental to him E the
(isi$le sign of an in(isi$le, intelligent, and creati(e energ'.
nstress is the undercurrent of creati(e energ' that supports and $inds together the
)hole of the created )orld, gi(ing things shape and form, and gi(ing /o' and meaning to
the $eholder. nstress comes closest of all of Hopins terms to an e3uation )ith
"hitehead’s term creativity. "ithout this current of instress )hich runs through the
outside )orld and through the percei(ing mind, there )ould $e no $ridge $et)een the
t)o, and the )orld )ould $e unintelligi$le.
There )ould $e no $ridge, no stem of stress
$et)een us and things to $ear us out and
carr' the mind o(er.5<
>
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
9/35
nstress or creati(it', the uni(ersal energ' of creation, aims at fierce intensit' and
idios'ncratic haecceit'. nscape then refers to the patterns and perspecti(es in nature, to
the inner 1la) of shapes2 and designs in all things. Hopins loos at a handful of
$lue$ells, a chestnut tree, a dead tree, a fine sunset, or the $reaers on the shore, and tries
to find a uni3ue perspecti(e )hich /oins together all the elements of the scene in the
ecstas' of the moment. n each of these e+periences a great deal of detail is fused into a
no(el $lend of instantaneous en/o'ment. n such an ecstas' the inscape of the )hole is
percei(ed and the instress gi(ing it its inner energ' it is appreciated.
!ll creatures ha(e an inner and an outer aspect, according to )hich the' e+press
themsel(es in order to $ecome themsel(es: 1the' necessaril' e+press themsel(es in order
to attain their o)n nature.25= There is an in(isi$le realit' in things )hich manifests itself
through a (isi$le outer realit'. "alter ?ng5> )rites of Hopins’ o)n personal inscape. n
"hitehead, the o$/ecti(e realit' of an actual occasion is preceded $' phases of inner self-
generation and su$/ecti(e satisfaction. 4or "hitehead, this inner aspect of realit' defeats
the thesis of mechanism, and maes his a philosoph' of organism. The stages of
concrescence, especiall' the inner stages of process and satisfaction, as descri$ed $'
"hitehead, correspond to the inscape of natural realities in Hopins.
nscape, that is, free internal self-constitution, is 1the (er' soul of art,2 according to
Hopins. !rt is not the reproduction of a surface realit'. "hat matters is the internal self-
shaping of the )or of art, not its correspondence to an'thing outside itself. 4or Hopins,
the )or of art e+ercises its o)n inner, organic, e(en self-generating realit'. The
@
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
10/35
s'mpathetic e+perience of this process as it happens in the self-constituting )or of art is
our no)ledge of inscape. The )or of art, the poem, is $oth organic and s'm$olic,
e+pressing itself in order to $ecome itself.
The appreciation of real particulars in nature, )ith their inscapes and instresses, maes
us and them glo) )ith intensit' and the fire of ecstas'. %ach poem is also a real
particular or consrescence, and has its o)n inscape that is read' to communicate itself to
the attenti(e listener. %(er'thing in the )hole scale of creation stri(es, in its o)n )a', to
reali0e )hat &uns cotus called haecceitas E its o)n self-crafted, God-created, and
Christ-filled identit', uni3ueness, particularit', and selfhood. n doing this each thing
gi(es glor' to God. Hopins )rote of all things $eing charged 8in (irtue of their instress9
)ith lo(e and )ith God7 1if )e no) ho) to touch them, the' gi(e off spars and tae
fire . . .25@
iii $articulars and $lentitude
%ach thing in inanimate nature $roadcasts its o)n inner identit', $ut does not
consciousl' gi(e glor' to God. t needs to $e completed $' contemplation in human
consciousness. The human realit' alone is conscious, has freedom of choice, and can
therefore choose to return glor' to God. "e e+perience oursel(es to $e 1more highl'
pitched, sel(ed and distincti(e than an'thing in the )orld.26A
%ach mortal thing does one thing and the same:
*A
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
11/35
&eals out that $eing indoors each one d)ells7
el(es E goes itself7 myself it speas and spells,
Cr'ing %hat ! do is me& for that ! came.6*
el(ing in Hopins is the e' function of each $eing or nature, there$' $ecoming
complete, genuine, or authentic. To a "hiteheadian, $ecoming something lie a self
)ould suggest the transformati(e process )here$' the God-gi(en initial aim $ecomes the
subjective aim'( during concrescence. The su$/ecti(ist principle pro(ides that all entities
)hatsoe(er are inchoatel' su$/ects.
66
This means that, for the "hiteheadian, as for
Hopins, all creatures, e(en inanimate ones, are capa$le of at least primiti(e mental
functions, that is, sel(ing.6
ingfishers and dragonflies gi(e glor' to God, $ut the' are not a)are of their
function or contri$ution. %m$odied human consciousness percei(es and enhances the
glor', and offers it $ac to God. The $asis of this incarnational realit' is the cosmic
Christ7 that is, the Bod' of Christ made manifest in and through the $odies of those )ho
do God’s )ill, )ho choose God’s glor'. t is important to Hopins that this $e the $odil'
realit' of the human Christ, and not simpl' the eternal ogos, the Hol' pirit, or God
functioning in an' )a' lacing the full humanit' demanded $' the m'ster' of the
incarnation.
n the spirit of &uns cotus, Hopins shares the empirical temper that is the mar of
British thought and sensi$ililt'. n the thought of cotus, the importance of the $odil'
**
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
12/35
humanit' of Christ, and its permanent significance for our redemption, is $ased on the
significance of matter. Matter has an essence of its o)n, independent of all form,
according to cotus. Matter is for him a constituent of e(er' created $eing, e(en the
angels, in )hom spiritual matter is present. 4or cotus, matter is $' itself a positi(e
entit', not a pure potenc', and can e+ist e(en in a condition of formlessness. !t its initial
creation, matter is prolepticall' charged )ith the realit' of the incarnation.
?n the cotist (ie), in creating primordial matter God alread' had in (ie) the di(ine
incarnation of the eternal ogos in esus Christ. The redemption of the )orld is thus a
secondar' reason for the incarnation, and the incarnation itself is the primar' reason for
creation. Bo'le points out that, for Hopins, 1God’s first intention and his first creati(e
product is the humanit' of Christ.26; %(er'thing else )as created in, through, and for the
human Christ.
That is Christ pla'ing at me pla'ing at
Christ, onl' that it is no pla' $ut truth7 That is
Christ being me and me $eing Christ.6<
f matter is a primordial and essential element in God’s plan for cotus, then there is
something more re3uired to account for the uni3ue indi(idualit' of e(er' particular
creature. 4or him, neither form nor matter can account for the particularit' of indi(idual
$eings.6= cotus supplied this further element in his notion of haecceitas or thisness.
"hat finall' maes a form real, as God creates a particular thing, is not the form’s unit'
*5
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
13/35
)ith matter, $ut a further principle )hich completes the indi(idual form and is ultimatel'
responsi$le for the actualit' of each particular $eing. t is this haecceit' that Hopins
intends his inscape to $e. ! "hiteheadian )ould thin that the transformation of the
initial aim into the su$/ecti(e aim is also at )or here. t is God’s aim or intention for
each thing or scene in nature that it sho) itself forth in its o)n particular $eaut'. t is the
appreciation of this inscape and this transformation of initial aim into su$/ecti(e aim that
gi(es glor' to God in poetr'.
The importance of the no)ledge of concrete singular $eings in cotus anticipates the
empirical interest in later British philosoph'. t also anticipates the cele$ration of nature
in all of its (ariet' and particularit' in #omantic poetr'. !rthur ?. o(e/o' 6> finds in
#omanticism an inheritance of the Platonic principle of plentitude, 1that di(ersit' itself is
of the essence of e+cellence,2 and 1that the $est of all possi$le )orlds is the most
(ariegated.2 n this neo-Platonic perspecti(e, the o(erflo)ing fecundit' and generati(it'
of the di(ine essence produces the m'riad of species and indi(iduals in nature. The
human imagination and the human facult' for language and e+pression e+tend this
plentitude )ith creati(it' and generati(it' of their o)n.
!ccording to o(e/o',6@ cotus accepted the di(ine fecundit', the principle of
plentitude, and the great chain of $eing. Gardner sa's: 1indi(idual su$stances, according
to the metaph'sical richness of their $eing, mae up one (ast hierarch' 8or chain9 )ith
God as their summit.2A "hat Hopins did not accept )as a necessitarian interpretation of
*6
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
14/35
plentitude7 God freel' created all things out of an o(erflo)ing a$undance and personal
lo(e. t )as freel' gi(en lo(e and not necessit' that moti(ated the di(ine creati(e )ill.
&enis &onaghue* agrees )ith the placement of Hopins )ithin #omanticism in
1constantl' rene)ed delight in the plentitude of the )orld.2 o(e/o' adds to this idea the
dictum of "illiam Blae as archromantic: 1%+u$erance is $eaut'.2 Plentitude, di(ersit',
and e+u$erance, and the constant no(el arising of these mae up the #omantic sensi$ilit'.
These also constitute the dominant thematic and tonalit' of "hitehead’s cosmolog'.
4or "hitehead, the essence of #omanticism lies in its organic rather than mechanical
)a' of modeling realit'.5 t lies in the intuition of the solidarit' or interrelatedness in
nature. !ll things are internall' related for "hitehead, and each modicum of realit'
contains at its center something lie the sensiti(it' and su$/ecti(it' en/o'ed $' humans.
Hopins meets and matches "hitehead’s reformed subjectivist principle )ith his notion
of selving , )hich applies to su$human species and inanimate entities as )ell. el(ing
adds something to the idea of inscape, continuing the theme of haecceit', $' placing a
seed of su$/ecti(it' )ithin each and e(er' $eing.
&onoghue credits Hopins for his intimac' of contact )ith the )orld, seeing his
no)ledge of the )orld 1$' attending to its fullness and indi(idualit'.2 6 Hopins feels
the organic $ond $et)een God, )ider nature, and humanit', and thins at times 1of the
natural )orld as a great $od' mediating $et)een himself and God.2 The reticular or
inter)o(en relationship $et)een God, )orld, and humanit' tends at times to melt into
*
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
15/35
near identit', as in other #omantic poetr'. Fet, Hopins’ stronger de(otion, lie Blae’s,
is gi(en at length to 1minute particulars rather than to general truths.2;
iv $armenides and )eraclitus
Mil)ard finds in Hopins’ ecstatic e+periences of inscape a ind of percei(ing in
)hich inscape holds man' parts together as one.
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
16/35
is an e+perience of intimate self-possession, uni3ue particularit', and munificent
e+u$erance.
Balancing the Parmenidean perception of $eing e(er')here in Hopins, Mil)ard
discerns as )ell the Heraclitean flu+, the ri(er of passing time, )hich s)ells into the
parado+ical images of $oth )ater and fire. Comparing 1The "rec of the &eutschland2
)ith 1Heraclitean 4ire,2 Mil)ard finds images of time flo)ing a)a' and the )orld
$urning a)a'.
Million-fueled, nature’s $onfire $urns on.
>
The "hiteheadian is not )ithout categories for understanding the Hopinsian
e+tremes of $oth flu+ and permanence. Hopins’ poem on 1Heraclitean 4ire2 could ser(e
as a h'mn to proclaim "hitehead’s doctrine of perpetual perishing . The perishing@ of
actual occasions, especiall' )hen these actual occasions are eenl' felt as one’s o)n, can
also $e felt )ith the su$/ecti(e form of terror. ?ne can feel terri$l' isolated, a$andoned
and forlorn, as does Hopins in the terrible sonnets. %speciall', the one-time enraptured
m'stic can feel utterl' separated from God, long after one’s connection )ith God has
$ecome the supremel' important and defining (alue in the spiritual life.
&a(id &aiches;A points to the financial meaning of the )ord interests in The *antern
out of +oors Christ is interested in us, and he adds to the (alue of )hat )e do. !s
redemption and ransoming are financial terms, so is interest Perhaps Hopins also
intended the idea of inter 8$ur'9 to lin )ith the )ord mould in the follo)ing (erse. "e
*
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
17/35
meet Christ in d'ing, and he is beteen 8in atin: inter est 9 us and our re)ard. Christ here
is lie "hitehead’s conse3uent nature of God,;* crediting us )ith an increase, )hile
preser(ing our holdings e(erlastingl'.
v -rganicity and Concrescence
o(e/o';5 $egins his tracing of the path of the principle of plentitude in "estern
thought )ith Plato’s theolog'. o(e/o' sees t)o gods in Plato. !s the dea of the good, or
the form of the good, God for Plato )as the apotheosis of unit' and the source of all other
forms. The demiurge, $' contrast, an inferior deit' or aspect of di(init', )as the part of
the godhead that entrapped the forms or souls in matter, thus initiating di(ersit',
fecundit', and particularit'. Haecceit' )ould ha(e $een, for Plato, due to the unfortunate
meddling of a lesser aspect of di(init'. 4or Hopins, haecceit' is the $lessed acme of
di(ine creati(it'. 4ecundit' and particularit', for Hopins, re(eal the true $ount' and
genius of the di(ine.
n Neo-platonism, the first God, lie the God of later Christian theolog', )as the goal
of the ascent of souls as the' mo(ed $ac to their true source. !ccordingl', the li$erated
soul turned from all finite and created things, and ascended $ac to the immuta$le
perfection in )hich it then found rest and identit'. The other or lesser god )as the source
and energ' of the descending process $' )hich $eing flo)s through all the le(els of
realit', e(er more diluted and deri(ed, do)n to the (er' lo)est. The first God in(ited
*=
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
18/35
li$erating flight from the man' to the one, leading to true delight. The second deit'
offered the false delight of emanation into the man' and a)a' from the one.
This tension, or something related to it, sho)s up in "hitehead, )ho also $ases his
theodic' in the Timaeus of Plato. "hitehead produces in speculation a dipolar deit', )ho
has $oth a primordial nature;6 and a conse3uent nature. The primordial nature en/o's the
classical attri$utes associated )ith transcendence, )hile the conse3uent nature a$sor$s
$ac into itself the di(ersit' of perfections reali0ed $' the finite entities of the )orld. n
"hitehead, it is God, operating from the primordial nature, )ho supplies in e(er' instant
a m'riad of initial aims as seeds initiating )hat God sees as the self-creation of all the
entities in the uni(erse.
n "hitehead, each actual entit' or actual occasion, e(en the most tri(ial and
inanimate, en/o's a modicum of feeling and satisfaction. ust as God is dipolar, ; each
entit' is dipolar,;; )ith mental as )ell as ph'sical aspects. %ach entit' constitutes itself in
(irtue of a decision;
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
19/35
constantl' ne) entities are at once self-creating and then perishing in the uni(erse. 4or
"hitehead, God, as the principle of limitation, is the chief supplier of order or discipline
in the uni(erse. 4or him, creati(it' is a principle independent of God, )ith it o)n
initiati(e, energ', and a$ilit' to construct itself into concrescences.;> ! Christian
philosopher )ith "hiteheadian s'mpathies must criticall' recogni0e discrepancies
$et)een the "hiteheadian cosmolog' and a Christian metaph'sics in )hich God is sole
creator.
To the e+tent that God supplies the order or discipline of the uni(erse, creati(it' is that
)hich is disciplined. 4or "hitehead, God supplies discipline and direction in the uni(erse
and functions as the principle of limitation.;@ 4or "hitehead, creati(it' is infinite
fecundit', and is the principle of plentitude. 4ecundit' is a s'non'm for plentitude.
4ecundit' here ma' not $e unlimited7 it ma' $e simpl' la(ish, generous, and profuse, and
still $e limited. God, for "hitehead, is a creature and supreme instantiation of this
fecundit' or creati(it'7 )hereas, for traditional Christianit', God is the creator of
creati(it' and director of its proliferation. "hitehead esche)s the term matter , $ut, to the
Christian, his creati(it' seems to function as a material principle, not as pure potenc' or
passi(e recepti(it', $ut as an acti(e energ'
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
20/35
n "hitehead, e(er' self-creating actual entit' en/o's at least a modicum of
su$/ecti(it'. t also e+ercises freedom or self-determination, and has a stage of decision
as part of its concrescence. God supplies to e(er' actual entit' an initial aim
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
21/35
of the past flo) in upon a ne)l' concrescing occasion to tae their places in its internal
constitution. n the process phase, each of the occasions included in the ne) occasion or
entit' are assigned a place and a (alue. n the decision phase, the ne) occasion, no longer
ne), $ecomes an o$/ect for inclusion in successor occasions, anticipating the influence it
)ill ha(e as an ingredient. n the satisfaction phase, the satisfaction is identified )ith the
completed actual entit', and is super/ect,
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
22/35
! prehension is made up of an entit' that is prehended and the entit' that is
prehending that entit'. #elating and com$ining the t)o is a su$/ecti(e form
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
23/35
1The "indho(er2
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
24/35
no) reconciled. !ll data, that is, prehensions of actual entities, buckle together, and the
no(el set of relations, the self-integrated composition of the no(el occasion of e+perience,
is achie(ed. Here $eaut' is manifested as a function of the relatedness of all contri$utors.
4urthermore, the su$/ecti(e forms $' )hich each of the data are prehended are indled at
this point, and the' include affections of /o', ecstas', rapture, or consolation. n Hopins’
poem, the impression of Christ, latentl' present in each and e(er' prehended datum, is
no) manifested from )ithin the concrescing modicum of no(el $eing. Christ is no) the
scape or inner constitution of the emergent poem, and ho(ers intensel' in the electrified
air as the (alue also distilled out of all the data and prehensa.
n The %indhover , $ucling most liel' has to do )ith the $ird locing in upon its
pre' and immediatel' taing the posture that $egins its stoup. Here $eaut' is caught as a
glimpse of glinting sun against the $ird and against the $acground of a gra' s'. n the
same moment, Christ is caught in a glimpse that suggests his redempti(e descent to catch
souls in general, or to catch up the poet in ecstas'. Christ is the one caught and the one
)ho does the catching. ! "hiteheadian thins of the $ucling together of all the data in
the process phase of concrescence. The stoup or di(e of the falcon is the inesis and
enosis that occurs as the initial aim $ecomes the su$/ecti(e aim in the heart of
concrescence.
The third phase is that of satisfaction. Here emerges the poet’s heart in hiding . The
poet’s /o' is the satisfaction recorded in the poem. !ctuall', a dou$le satisfaction is
suggested here, as if the poet en/o's a self-feeling 8. . my heart in hiding . Stirred for a
5
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
25/35
bird .9 in function of Christ’s en/o'ment, s'm$oli0ed as the $ird’s ecstasy. This
suggests t)o concrescences: one of the poet, and one of Christ. t suggests as )ell a
communion in )hich the poet prehends Christ’s satisfaction or completed actual occasion
)ith the same sense of intimac' )ith )hich he en/o's his o)n actual occasion. "hat is
presented here are t)o satisfactions $eing en/o'ed simultaneousl', the ecstas' of Christ
and the stirring heart of the poet, $oth recorded in the poem.
t is in the satisfaction phase that sel(ing primaril' taes place. Here the initial aim,
)hich is gi(en to each occasion in the uni(erse $' God as its instigation to $ecome and
its pacage of possi$ilities for reali0ation, is appropriated and transformed $' freedom
into the su$/ecti(e aim, )hich is uni3ue and freel' de(eloped $' each occasion. f
satisfaction is selftaste, then the su$/ecti(e aim maes the occasion the chief participant
in its o)n creation. 4urthermore, this re(eals God’s )ill to ha(e freedom as a part of the
self-enactment of e(er' creature.
The fourth phase is the one in )hich gold-(ermillion flame $ursts out of $lue-$lea
em$ers. The o$/ectified entit' no) reaches its final phase, satisfaction or anticipation, in
)hich it offers itself as a ne) datum for inclusion into the composition of successor
occasions. Here it gi(es itself $ac )ith all that is has achie(ed to God and to the
uni(erse. This is the phase of sacrifice in )hich )hat is returned registers e(erlastingl' in
the conse3uent nature of God. "e remind oursel(es of the heinah or di(ine presence,
and, the a$$alistic doctrine, in )hich em$ers signif' the radiant di(ine presence that
5;
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
26/35
hides and a$ides )ithin the Temple. 4rom the em$ers, the smoe of the sacrificial incense
/oins the cloud of presence ho(ering o(er the sanctuar'.
The success of comparing Hopins and "hitehead lies in reaching greater insight into
the cosmological (ision and hori0on of $oth for ha(ing compared them one to the other.
%ach poem of Hopins is a confluence of man' influences E Parmenidean, Heraclitean,
Platonic, neo-Platonic, cotist, 4ranciscan, and gnatian. But, lie the genius of the poet,
each indi(idual poem transcends all of its influences, orchestrates and directs them from
)ithin to achie(e its o)n eminent particularit', its o)n haecceit'. t is the e+pression and
appreciation of particularit' and plentitude, and of all the comple+ multiplicit' $ecoming
one, that gi(es glor' to God. t is the cele$ration of $eing, )ith its unif'ing inscape of
Christ and its instress or creati(it' that returns to God the reflection of grandeur.
5
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
27/35
* Gerard Manle' Hopins, $oems and $rose of Gerard /anley )opkins, ed. ". H. Gardner 8Ne) For:
Penguin Boos, *@>;9, ++-++ii. 1!s a name for that indi(iduall' distincti(e form’ 8made up of (arious
sense data9 )hich constitutes the rich and re(ealing oneness of the natural o$/ect, he coined the )ord
inscape: and for that energ' of $eing $' )hich all things are upheld . . . he coined the term instress.2
)ill put the technical or idios'ncratic terms of Hopins in italics the first time use them and )hen
referring to them as terms.
5 Peter Mil)ard, .., 1Hopins on Man and Being,2 The 0ine +elight , ed. 4rancis . 4ennell 8Chicago,
o'ola Press, *@>@9, *6A7 14or it is in his e'es the dappledness in form that constitutes the uni3ueness
and originalit' of things in nature, )here no t)o o$/ects are precisel' alie.2 ee also, &enis
&onaghue, The -rdinary 1niverse 8Ne) For, Macmillan, *@9, >-;, and "alter ?ng, .., )opkins,
the Self, and God 8Toronto: Dni(ersit' of Toronto Press, *@>9, *>. 1!ctual entities’ E also termed actual occasions’ -- are the final real
things of )hich the )orld is made up.2 Microscopic $uilding $locs of the uni(erse, the' perish as
soon as the' are reali0ed, and so, in e(er' instant the )orld is made up of a no(el set of occasions.
Ne(ertheless, comple+ patterns of inheritance pro(ide for endurance. ee $rocess and Reality, *>-5A7
her$urne, " 2ey to %hitehead3s $rocess and Reality 8Bloomington, N: ndiana Dni(ersit' Press,
*@
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
28/35
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
29/35
*6 "hitehead, $rocess and Reality, 66-;*.
* Hopins, 1The Golden %cho,2 $oems and $rose, ;. ?r, Hopins, Selected $oetry 8Ne) For:
?+ford Dni(ersit' Press, *@@>9, *6@.
*;
#o$ert #. Bo'le, /etaphor in )opkins 8Chapel Hill: The Dni(ersit' of North Carolina Press, *@. 4or the connection $et)een glor' and heinah, see "alter . ?ng, . ., )opkins, the Self, and
God 8Toronto: Dni(ersit' of Toronto Press, *@>->*.
*
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
30/35
5* Ballinger, The $oem as Sacrament , *AA7 1 claim Hopins )as more 4ranciscan’ than esuit.’2
"hat is more liel' the case is that gnatius and esuit spiritualit' had inherited some of its
particularism from earlier 4ranciscan and cotist influences. Hopins dra)s upon the richness of $oth
of these sources, as parts of a single continuous tradtion.55 Dm$erto %co, "rt and Beauty in the /iddle "ges, trans. Hugh Bredin 8Ne) Ha(en, CN: Fale
Dni(ersit' Press, *@>=. 1#ather, it 8haecceitas9 is a principle )hich completes a thing in its
concreteness: the ultimate specific difference is simpl' to $e different from e(er'thing else’.2 Thus
%co 3uotes cotus.
56 "hitehead, The "ims of #ducation, *57 1t 8st'le9 is an aesthetic sense, $ased on admiration for the
direct attainment of a foreseen end, simpl' and )ithout )aste.2
5 Hopins pictures Christ d'ing on the cross as 1o(escape crucified2 in his poem 1The "rec of the
&eutschland,2 ee Mil)ard, .. and #a'mond choder, .., eds., Readings of the %reck& #ssays in
Commemoration of G/ )opkins3 =The %reck of the +eutschland> 8Chicago: o'ola Dni(ersit'
Press, *@=. ee also, Todd Bender, 1cope, cape, and "ord 4ormation in the e+icon of
Hopins,2 The 0ine +elight , *55, and ". !. M. Peters, .., Gerard /anley )opkins& " Critical #ssay
toards the 1nderstanding of )is $oetry 8Ne) For: ?+ford Dni(ersit' Press, *@>9, 5.
5; #ahner, 1Panentheism,2 Theological +ictionary, trans. 8Ne) For: Herder and Herder, *@
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
31/35
5= #ahner, 1The Theolog' of 'm$ol,2 Theological !nvestigations, (ol. , trans. e(in mith
8Baltimore: Helicon Press, *@
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
32/35
6; Bo'le, /etaphor in )opkins, 6A. ee also, Ballinger, The $oem as Sacrament , *5A7 1. . . for
cotus, creation )as dependent on the decree of the ncarnation.2
6
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
33/35
= oseph Hillis Miller, 1The Dni(ocal Chiming,2 )opkins& " Collection of Critical #ssays, ed. Geoffre'
Hartman 8%ngle)ood Cliffs, N: Prentice Hall, nc., *@;9, *A;-=.
;* "hitehead, $rocess and Reality, 6@7 1The conse3uent nature of God is the fulfillment of his
e+perience $' his reception of the multiple freedom of actualit' into the harmon' of his o)n
actuali0ation.2 God a$sor$s into himself all the perfection achie(ed $' the )orld as it perishes a)a'.
;5 o(e/o', The Great Chain of Being , >5-. o(e/o' notes the transformation of Platonism into
romanticism: 1Thus, at last, the Platonistic scheme of the uni(erse is turned upside do)n. Not onl' had
the originall' complete and immuta$le Chain of Being $een con(erted into a Becoming . . .865;-
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
34/35
;= $id, 5*7 1’Creati(it'’ is the principle of no(elt'.2 !nd also, 1Creati(it' achie(es its supreme tas of
transforming dis/ointed multiplicit', )ith its di(ersities in opposition, into concrescent unit' . . .
86>9.2
;>
$id, *@. 1The four stages constituti(e of an actual entit' 8concrescence9 . . . can $e named, datum,
process, satisfaction, 8and9 decision.2
;@ o(e/o', The Great Chain of Being , 666. o(e/o' points out that "hitehead 1gi(es the name of God,
not to the nfinite 4ecundit' of emanationism, $ut to the principle of limitation.’2 o(e/o' 3uotes
"hitehead: 1God is the ultimate limitation, and his e+istence is the ultimate irrationalit'.2 ?n this, see
"hitehead, Science and the /odern %orld , *=>.
8/20/2019 Hopkins and Whitehead
35/35