+ All Categories
Home > Education > How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Date post: 01-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: alice-bedard-voorhees
View: 525 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
These slides were initially prepared for a presentation at Hong Kong City University in Oct. 2010. I later added a few slides defining e-learning and addressing 21st century learning.
Popular Tags:
49
How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in our Courses Adapted from the Original Presentation at City University of Hong Kong October 2010 Alice Bedard-Voorhees, PhD The Constant Learning Organization
Transcript
Page 1: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in our Courses

Adapted from the Original Presentation at City University of Hong Kong

October 2010Alice Bedard-Voorhees, PhD

The Constant Learning Organization

Page 2: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

This presentation may be shared as long as the creator has been given credit and it is not used modified or used for commercial purposes.

Please review the conditions for use: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Creative Commons Licensing

Page 3: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Standards

Measurement

Improvement

Quality Definition: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/quality.html

Effective Learning

What is Quality Practice?

Page 4: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

21st Century and E-Learning

21st Century Skills: Technology tools and skills will allow learners and future workers to express their expertise in these ways:

Locate and Evaluate Information, Create, Collaborate, Communicate

http://www.evalutech.sreb.org/21stcentury/whatare.asp

Page 5: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

“Undergraduate students need to develop two types of skills: information literacy or fluency and the technical skills needed to use the tools.” Kavik (1999-2010)

http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/ConvenienceCommunicationsandCo/6070

Page 6: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Definition: Distance Learning

Technology-Delivered Learning whereteacher and learner are separated by time, space, or both.

Online learning is a subset of distancelearning.

https://uasystem.net/?p=5

Page 7: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

E-Learning Options Face-to-Face with Technological Learning Components

Hybrid/Blended (Two different classrooms): Face-to-Face and Tech-based.

Full Technology-Based Delivery

See Electronic Based E-Learning http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/elearning/define.html

Page 8: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

How Are We Doing?

Institutional Supports

Interface Design

Instructional Experience: Facilitation, Interaction, Community, Professional Development Expectations

Student Performance and Satisfaction

Page 9: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

A Variety of Models

What standards do a given model offer? (Institutional Integration, Course Design, Course Facilitation?)

How do we determine what is right for us? (Critical Standards, Context?)

How do we strengthen this effort across our various units?

Page 10: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Why is this a college-wide question?

Page 11: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Khan’s E-Learning Framework

(Khan, 2008. Used with Permission)

See Also: Frydenberg’s (2002) Article on Quality Standards: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/109/189

Page 12: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Chickering and Gamson’s

Seven Principles of Good Practice

Teacher-Student InteractionPositive exchanges between LearnersActive LearningPrompt FeedbackTime on Task“Communicates High Expectations”Learning Diversity

See Chickering and Erhmann: “Implementing the Seven Principles”

Page 13: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Institutional Considerations

Leader of the effort?

Instructional readiness?

Institutional offering or partnership?

Financial readiness?

Provision of institutional services?

(Used with Permission)

Page 14: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Software/ServicesHardwareSupportDigital LiteracySharable ObjectsPolicy (Khan, 2005b)

(Used with Permission)

Technological Considerations

Page 15: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Management Considerations

People, Process, Product are key and are further defined by oversight, design, implementation, and ongoingupdates (Khan, 2005) What people will do and what skills setsAre needed: oversee, make,communicate, facilitate, maintain.

)

(Used with Permission)

P3

Page 16: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Shared Support Example

Help Desk Triage

Help Desk Staff: All Student and Faculty Calls Come to Help DeskCalls Tracked and General Calls Answered Here

Faculty Dev Office: Faculty questions about contentand specific instructional questions

Virtual Campus Staff:Student and Faculty Questions Specifically Related to Fully Online Offerings

Page 17: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Pedagogical Considerations

(Used with Permission)

Needs /Audience AnalysisNeeds /Audience Analysis

MediaMedia

Instructional Techniques Instructional Techniques

MotivationMotivation

Provisions for various models Provisions for various models

(Khan, 2005b)(Khan, 2005b)

Content RightsContent Rights

Note: See also Quality Matters and CCCS Faculty GoldNote: See also Quality Matters and CCCS Faculty Gold

Page 18: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Ethical Considerations(Community Considerations)

Social and Political InfluencesSocial and Political InfluencesCultural DiversityCultural DiversityBiasBiasGeographical DiversityGeographical DiversityLearner DiversityLearner DiversityDigital AccessDigital AccessEtiquette Etiquette Legal IssuesLegal Issues

(Khan, 2005b, p. 293)(Khan, 2005b, p. 293)

(Used with Permission)

Page 19: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Interface Design

Content DesignContent Design

NavigationNavigation

User FriendlinessUser Friendliness

Universal Access Universal Access (Accomodations)(Accomodations)

(Khan, 2005b)(Khan, 2005b)

(Used with Permission)

Note: See Quality Matters

Page 20: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

(Used with Permission) user technical support

financial aid

advising

library

tutorials and tutoring services

Resource Support (Materials and Services outside of the immediate class experience)

Page 21: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Some Early FIPSE (QM) Essential Standards (Course Design/Quoted Material)

I.1 Navigational instructions are provided.I.2 Intro to course and learning structure are provided.II.1 Learning Objectives name measurable outcomes II.2 Objectives address content mastery, critical thinking skills, and core learning skills. III.1 Assessments are based on learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources. III.2 Grading Policy is transparent and easy to understand. III.3 Assessment and measurement strategies are designed to provide feedback to the student.

VII. The course instructions link to a clear description of the technical support offered.

Source: http://qminstitute.org/home/Public%20Library/About%20QM/RubricStandards2008-2010.pdf

Page 22: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Criteria Best Good Needs Improvement Reason Coaching Tip

Example of a Facilitation Standardhttp://at.ccconline.org/faculty/wiki/CCCOnline_-_Discussion_Rubrics

Page 23: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Course Evaluation Example: Pedagogical Checklist

Blackboard provided documents and communications and discussions out-of-world

SL inventory allowed learners to store items and informational notecards pertinent to use right in Second Life

SL inventory permissions allowed learners to share items with class

SL sandbox provided a synchronous area to practice skills, rehearse presentations

BBoard was a more reliable platform, and SLife was not as reliable (ie. voice, general grid).

Page 24: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Examples Related to the Ethics ChecklistExamples Related to the Ethics Checklist

Geographic diversity (time zones) Digital Access: Download rates, internet

access, blocked downloads, access to devices

Etiquette: Turning off the mic when not speaking, guides for positive discussions

Legal Issue: Disclaimer about exposure to mature content in Second Life, attention to use of copy-right protected content

Page 25: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Course Evaluation Example: Interface Design Checklist

Uncomplicated, clear content in BB: weekly overviews and assignments

While we used the chat for a hearing-impaired guest, screen readers don’t work in chat

R and D groups are working on access for visually and kinesthetically restricted users. (Sierra, 2007; Foster, 2007)

Page 26: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Course Example: Management Checklist

Oversight: Chair

Design: faculty, grad assist.

Facilitate: faculty, guests, grad assist.

Updates: faculty and grad assist.

Page 27: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Extended Studies Course: Resource Support

Marketing Materials: Department provided informationAbout pre-req skills and Second Life tech requirements

Institutional website: student success, library, LMS Support

Dept. provided advisement via email

Faculty notified learners of additional Second Life Tutorials

Faculty and Graduate Assist. provided out-of-class tutoringfor Second Life work.

Page 28: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Overall Evaluation: How did it Overall Evaluation: How did it go? Where are there problems?go? Where are there problems?

Learning Assessment: How do Learning Assessment: How do we know what they know? What we know what they know? What might be improved?might be improved?

Course/Workshop Evaluation:Course/Workshop Evaluation:Learner success and retention Learner success and retention Learner satisfaction with Learner satisfaction with experience and facilitationexperience and facilitationFaculty/Presenter evaluation Faculty/Presenter evaluation

Evaluation Considerations

(Used with Permission)

Page 29: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Assessment of Learning

What are the competencies for the course?

Do the assessments measure them? Do the grades/pass requirements

truly reflect the outcomes? Is the opportunity to have studentsuse technology for assessment tasks?

See: http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#toc10

Page 30: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

How can we use the LMS and Web2.0 for Good Practice?

Use LMS feedback loops and quiz features to give quick feedback and buy time for our more thoughtful feedback.

Use email and announcements to provide feedback and communicate expectations.

Use discussion tool as a classroom space. Use Web2.O to increase engagement and

support creative diversity by allowing students to demonstrate learning with choices.

Page 31: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Pre-Assessing Student Use of Web2.0

What apps are you using, like to use?Would they help your learning in this class?How?Share with me what you would use to

demonstrate your learning for X….how would that be measured?

For the instructor: Can more than one of these apps be used at the same time to accomplish the same end (Ex. SMS, Twitter on Phone or Computer)?

Page 32: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Example: Student Evaluation of a Hybrid Course

Weakness: Second Life Grid could be undependable, inaccessible (ADA)

Assessment: Rubrics-defined performance; project based, reflective self-evaluation

Faculty Evaluation: Excellent facilitator and communicator;

demonstrated flexibility and enthusiasm

Satisfaction: Learners self-selected the model and learned “Plan B” thinking; valued interaction and immersion, would take another course but would have to save up for a future offering

Improvement: Overview of Virtual Worlds

Overall: Immersive, constructivist activities and interactions with others were the value

Page 33: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Thank You!

Please feel free to share models you use or are exploring.

Email: [email protected]

Page 34: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Links to Various Models+ Khan’s e-Learning Model (Integrative)

http://asianvu.com/bookstoread/framework/+ Quality Matters (Course Design)

http://qminstitute.org/home/Public%20Library/About%20QM/RubricStandards2008-2010.pdf

+ E-Learning Quality: Extensive links to various quality articles and standards: http://depd.wisc.edu/html/quality3.htm Included here

is a 2002 article which names common categories found across the literature: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/109/189

+ EFQUEL: http://www.efquel.org/openecbcheck/images/stories/docs/ECB-Check_Self-Assessment-ToolforCourses.pdf Course design emphasis.

+ Illinois Model: http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/initiatives/qoci/categories.asp Course Design emphasis with several categories of design and support and how that is communicated though the course design.

+ Ohio Model based on Chickering and Gamson http://www.oln.org/ILT/7_principles/principles.php

+ CCCOnline Faculty Gold (Facilitation): http://at.ccconline.org/faculty/wiki/CCCOnline_-_Discussion_Rubrics

Page 35: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Links to Additional ReferencesBloom’s Digital Taxonomy: http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#toc10Boise State University (2004). Information for enrolled students. [Online] http://itc.boisestate.edu/orient/orient.htmChickering, A., and S. Ehrmann. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, October, pp. 3 – 6.Clark, Don. Defining eLearning. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/elearning/define.htmlDawley, L. (2007b). Syllabus for EDTECH 597: Teaching and Learning in Second Life. Boise State University. Boise, Idaho.Foster, A.L. (2007, October 15). Thought-controlled avatars emerge in Second Life. The Wired Chronicle. Retrieved on December 11, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/2454/thought-controlled-avatars-emerge-in-second-lifeKavik, R. (1999-2010) Convenience, Communications, and Control: How Students Use Technology

EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research and University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Retrieved on October 11, 2010 from

http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/ConvenienceCommunicationsandCo/6070

Khan, B. (2005a). E-learning quick checklist. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.Khan, B. (2005b). Managing E-Learning Strategies: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.Khan, B. (2003). The e-learning framework. Retrieved on December 11, 2007, from http://asianvu.com/bookstoread/framework/Khan, B. (2008). E-Learning Model Graphics. Permissions received October 8, 2008, from McWeadon.com.Linden Research, Inc. (2007). Second Life blog. Retrieved on December 12, 2007, from http://blog.secondlife.com/Sierra, M. B. (2007). IBM project: Second life accessible for blind people. Techpin: Daily Tech News. 24 2007. Retrieved on November 13, 2007, from http://www.techpin.com/ibm-project-second-life-accessible-for-blind-people/#comment-1205

Page 36: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Additional References Concluded

Southern Regional Education Board (SREB). (1999-). What are 21st century skills? Retrieved on October 11, 2010, from http://www.evalutech.sreb.org/21stcentury/whatare.asp

University of Alabama Telecampus. (2009). What is distance learning? Retrieved on October 13, 2010, from https://uasystem.net/?p=5

Page 37: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Web2.0

Examples of students using Web2.0 for demonstrations of learning.(For use if there is interest or time.)

Page 38: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Licensed Under Creative Commons to RYYO: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryyo/249804450/

Web 2.0 Examples

Page 39: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Some Web2.0 Choices

Blip.fm: music channels Jing: screen shots, screen casts Twitter and SMS: micro-blogging Twitpic and Flickr: photos Slideshare: slideshows on the web Voicethread: interactive slideshows on the web Serious Games and Second Life: immersive

learning Glogster: multimedia posters Social Bookmarking

Page 40: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Blip.fm: Online DJ’shttp://blip.fm/baroquecomposers

Page 41: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Static Screen Capture Using JING

Page 42: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Twitter and Instant Messaging

Page 43: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Tweet, Tweet, Tweet

SL Tweets: From Second Life about great places to visit (provide location coordinates)

Class Accounts: As a way of sharing Reading Notes

Faculty Assistance: As a way to be available for last minute project questions (defined time-frame)

Page 44: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Twitter and Twitpic

Needed: Twitter AccountTwitter Account allows for posting to TwitpicStudents either start following a class

account or use a #hashtagTweets can be shared from Slife also

with clients like SLTweets.com

Page 45: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Photos: Twitpic

http://twitpic.com/photos/constantlearn

(Twitter account provides access.)

Opportunity to teach digital rights observance.

Page 46: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

FLICKR + Phone

Faculty Creates Flickr Class AccountGives Class User Name and PasswordStudents Upload to Flickr AccountPhotos can be AnnotatedFlickr Allows Short Video Uploads TooRSS can feed account into LMSOpportunity to Teach Digital Rights + Creative

Commons Search

Page 47: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Voicethread https://voicethread.com/#q.b3352.i28616

Page 48: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Virtual/Immersive

Second Life is one of many:

Page 49: How Are We Doing? Evaluating Technology-Based Practices in Our Courses

Glogster: Multimedia Posters

http://coloradomtn.edu.glogster.com/Web20-Buffet/


Recommended