220179206 D G Tharindu(HSNS368) Abstract.pdfby Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

Submission date: 29-Apr-2019 11:41PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 1121314696File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HSNS368___Abstract_1545045_1387904027.pdf(194.5K)Word count: 911Character count: 5456

40%SIMILARITY INDEX

24%INTERNET SOURCES

20%PUBLICATIONS

34%STUDENT PAPERS

1 9%

2 4%

3 4%

4 4%

5 4%

6 3%

7 2%

8 2%

9 2%

10 2%

11

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS368) Abstract.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Australian Catholic UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to NorthcentralStudent Paper

Submitted to Grand Canyon UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to Georgia State UniversityStudent Paper

www.atsjournals.orgInternet Source

Submitted to RMIT UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to The University of Notre DameStudent Paper

Submitted to University of NorthamptonStudent Paper

ycacc.com.auInternet Source

Samir Bhagwat, George Bruxner. "‘Not quiteout of the woods’: potential for misdiagnosis ofdelayed neurologic syndrome of carbonmonoxide poisoning as relapse of mentalillness", Australasian Psychiatry, 2017Publicat ion

"Nursing Care of the Pediatric Neurosurgery

2%

12 1%

Exclude quotes Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f

Exclude matches Of f

Patient", Springer Nature, 2013Publicat ion

Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper

FINAL GRADE

26/40

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS368) Abstract.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

RUBRIC: HSNS368 A3 (POSTER)T1 2019

POSTER (20%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

D(80)

C(70)

P(60)

P(50)

N(40)

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

ABSTRACT (20%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

D(80)

C(70)

P

0 / 100

0 / 100

Demonstrates the ability to deliver nursing education through the use of a poster presentation

Poster presentation is presented in a logical and succinct sequence; ef f ectivetechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is notovercrowded and covers content to a high achieving level.

Poster presentation is presented in a logical and succinct sequence; ef f ectivetechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is notovercrowded and covers content to a high achieving level.

Poster presentation is presented in a logical and mostly succinct sequence;techniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is notovercrowded and covers content to a good level.

Poster presentation is delivered in a logical sequence; techniques are used tomaintain the attention of the audience, poster is not overcrowded and covers contentto a satisf actory level.

Poster presentation is presented in a sequence that is logical but may require work;some techniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster may be alitt le overcrowded and/or not cover content required

Poster presentation is presented in a sequence that is logical but may require work;some techniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster may be alitt le overcrowded and/or not cover content required

Poster presentation is delivered in a sequence that is conf using; lit t le to notechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is overcrowdedor very brief and may not cover content required.

Poster presentation is delivered in a sequence that is conf using; lit t le to notechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is overcrowdedor very brief and may not cover content required.

Poster presentation is delivered in a sequence that is conf using; lit t le to notechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is overcrowdedor very brief and may not cover content required.

Poster presentation is delivered in a sequence that is conf using; lit t le to notechniques are used to maintain the attention of the audience, poster is overcrowdedor very brief and may not cover content required.

0 / 100

Demonstrates ef f ective communication through an abstract

Abstract succinctly introduces the topic, strongly justif ies why it is important f or theacute care RN to understand the topic and conclude with the major elements the RNshould take f rom the poster

Abstract succinctly introduces the topic, strongly justif ies why it is important f or theacute care RN to understand the topic and conclude with the major elements the RNshould take f rom the poster

Abstract introduces the topic, justif ies why it is important f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic and conclude with some elements the RN should take f rom theposter (one section may need development)

Abstract introduces the topic, justif ies why it is important f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic and conclude with the major elements the RN should take f romthe poster (two sections may need development)

Abstract succinctly introduces the topic, strongly justif ies why it is important f or the

(60)

P(50)

N(40)

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

UNDERSTANDING (20%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

D(80)

C(70)

P(60)

P(50)

N(40)

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

SUPPORT (20%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

acute care RN to understand the topic and conclude with the major elements the RNshould take f rom the poster (all sections need development)

Abstract succinctly introduces the topic, strongly justif ies why it is important f or theacute care RN to understand the topic and conclude with the major elements the RNshould take f rom the poster (all sections need development)

Abstract doesn’t introduces topic, no justif ication f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic, no conclusion of elements the RN should take f rom the poster

Abstract doesn’t introduces topic, no justif ication f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic, no conclusion of elements the RN should take f rom the poster

Abstract doesn’t introduces topic, no justif ication f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic, no conclusion of elements the RN should take f rom the poster

Abstract doesn’t introduces topic, no justif ication f or the acute care RN tounderstand the topic, no conclusion of elements the RN should take f rom the poster

0 / 100

Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of a topic as evident through abstract and poster

Topic is an appropriate choice and content on the topic is comprehensive with indepth discussion evident. Content is current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice and content on the topic is comprehensive with indepth discussion evident. Content is current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice and content on the topic is generally comprehensivewith in depth discussion evident. Content is current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice and content on the topic is sound with gooddiscussions evident. Content is current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is soundbut needs development. Content is generally current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is soundbut needs development. Content is generally current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is brief andunsatisf actory. Content may or may not be current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is brief andunsatisf actory. Content may or may not be current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is brief andunsatisf actory. Content may or may not be current and accurate

Topic is an appropriate choice or may need revision; content on the topic is brief andunsatisf actory. Content may or may not be current and accurate

0 / 100

Demonstrated ability to review the literature and select appropriate sources Demonstrated ability toappraise and analyse the literature

Extensive review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Crit ical and comprehensive appraisal of the literature/ prof essional sourceslinked throughout the paper with strong analysis and links to discussion. Suggested10 + sources

Extensive review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Crit ical and comprehensive appraisal of the literature/ prof essional sourceslinked throughout the paper with strong analysis and links to discussion. Suggested10 + sources

D(80)

C(70)

P(60)

P(50)

N(40)

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

G/U/M (10%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

D(80)

C(70)

P(60)

P(50)

N(40)

Broad review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Crit ical appraisal of the literature/ prof essional sources soundly linkedthroughout the paper with sound analysis and links to discussion. Suggested 8 +sources

Adequate review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Appraisal of the literature/ prof essional sources linked throughout the paperwith analysis and links to discussion. Suggested 6 + sources

Some review of relevant literature f rom some peer reviewed and reputable sources.Possible use of less credible sources. Minimal appraisal of the literature/prof essional sources with some or f ew links throughout the paper. Some attempt atanalysis Suggested 4 + sources

Some review of relevant literature f rom some peer reviewed and reputable sources.Possible use of less credible sources. Minimal appraisal of the literature/prof essional sources with some or f ew links throughout the paper. Some attempt atanalysis Suggested 4 + sources

Litt le to no review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Use of less of less credible sources evident. Litt le to no appraisal of theliterature/ prof essional sources. Litt le to no analysis of the literature.

Litt le to no review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Use of less of less credible sources evident. Litt le to no appraisal of theliterature/ prof essional sources. Litt le to no analysis of the literature.

Litt le to no review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Use of less of less credible sources evident. Litt le to no appraisal of theliterature/ prof essional sources. Litt le to no analysis of the literature.

Litt le to no review of recent and relevant literature f rom peer reviewed and reputablesources. Use of less of less credible sources evident. Litt le to no appraisal of theliterature/ prof essional sources. Litt le to no analysis of the literature.

0 / 100

Follows requirements f or structure, presentation grammar and spelling.

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

APA (10%)

HD(100)

HD(90)

D(80)

C(70)

P(60)

P(50)

N(40)

N(30)

N(20)

N(10)

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

0 / 100

Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment