1
Human Resource Management and Circular Economy: A Critical
Perspective
Authors
Dr Chianu Dibia, University of Portsmouth, Faculty of Business and Law, Richmond
Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK, [email protected]
Dr Emeka Smart Oruh, Brunel University London, Brunel Business School, Kingston Lane,
Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK, [email protected]
Dr Matthew Anderson, University of Portsmouth, Faculty of Business and Law, Richmond
Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK, [email protected]
Dr Ganess Dirpal, University of Portsmouth, Faculty of Business and Law, Richmond
Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK, [email protected]
Abstract
While there is an increase in the number of organisations disclosing their commitment or
intentions to embrace the circular economy for sustainable futures, the role of individuals
found within these organisations and their management remains inconspicuous. Current
disclosures on Human Resource (HR) and the role of Human Resource Management (HRM)
at firm level Circular Economic (CE) transitions and practices are conceptual and few, which
limits both academics and practitioners’ understanding regarding the practical implications of
CE on organisations HR and how these could be managed. This research, therefore, addresses
this gap and intends to provide critical, empirical evidence and interpretations of HR and the
role of HRM within organisations CE pursuits – using six organisations (case studies). The
case studies included in this paper forms about ten per cent of the cases - to be analysed for
the second part of the study. These six case studies are selected to facilitate a pilot study, to
test the research approach/methods adopted to derive the research findings. Previous research
findings on firm-level CE functional areas has predominantly focused on product and process
design, supply chain, marketing and sales management; however, analysis of these case
studies found that currently, HRM role as a functional area that includes training,
recruitment/selection, performance and rewards management process are not captured in firm-
level CE transitions. Nonetheless, in terms of a critical perspective of HR and the role of HRM
within CE organisations, the analysis of these case studies captured the broader social
outcomes such as job creation, improvement in wellbeing and a change in organisational
culture. But it remains to be seen if similar trends would be identified within a wider sample
of business cases the researchers intend to examine to extend this research.
Keywords: Human Resource (HR), Human Resource Management (HRM), Role of HRM,
Sustainability, Circular Economy (CE)
Introduction
The objective of this paper is to understand the context of Human Resource (HR) and the role
of Human Resource Management (HRM) in realising organisations’ Circular Economic (CE)
2
objectives. HR refers to individuals working in and for organisations (Buller & McEvoy,
2012; Armstrong & Taylor, 2017). While, HRM although lacking in a single widely accepted
definition and agreed set of practices (Legge, 1989; Keenoy, 1990; Armstrong & Taylor,
2017), it could be understood as the endeavour to integrate or align the management of an
organisation’s people or human capital with the strategy of the firm, as defined by senior
management (Guest, 1990; Legge, 2005; Kerfoot & Knigths, 2017). The last but not least
important term to this research CE could be seen as a closed-looped model adopted by
organisations, whereby post-consumption products, materials and resources forms valuable
raw materials for another production and consumption cycle (Webster, 2015; Stahel, 2016;
Kirchherr, Reike, & Hekkert, 2017). CE is seen as an offshoot of Sustainable Development
(SD) initiatives open to organisations, to respond to current global natural resource shortages,
climate change and social inequality (European Commission [EC], 2015; Geissdoerfer,
Savaget, Bocken, & Hultink, 2017). According to McKinsey (2017), it is estimated that by
adopting of CE models at the macroeconomic level (which also has microeconomic
implications), resource productivity within European-Based economies could improve by 3%,
in addition to generating a cost saving of 600 billion Euros a year, and 1.8 trillion Euros in
other benefits to the European economy by 2030.
In the European Union (EU) action plan for the CE (EC, 2015) beyond the considerations of
CE as an operationalisation of SD initiatives within organisations, CE is also seen as a chance
to transform the European economy and engender new and sustainable competitive
advantages for Europe – through the protection of businesses from volatile prices and scarcity
of resources, aiding the creation of new business opportunities and innovative, and additional
efficiency in the approach to production and consumption (EC, 2015). That said, the action
plan (now dated as it was due to be carried out before 2020, but its principles will linger on)
falls short in setting the tune on HR and the role of HRM within organisations when making
CE transitions. This assertion is based on the assumption that there are explicit duties for other
organisational functions within the action plan – such as product and process design,
marketing and sales, procurement, and SCM (EC, 2015). While HR and the role of HRM
could be said to be implicit and open to wide varieties of interpretations within the action plan,
for example, it is mentioned in passing when discussing the changes to the production process
as a result of CE. It is said that there would be social impacts both in EU and non-EU countries;
however, what the social impacts will entail or include were not stated. In the section within
the action plan that focuses on consumption with significant concerns for marketing and sales
functions within organisations, an HR implication of CE is also briefly highlighted, i.e. the
possible contributions of CE to contribute to job creation especially in labour-intensive reuse
and repair sectors. Again, when discussing needed changes to the approach to procurement by
public authorities to foster the actualisation of CE pursuits within these organisations, HR and
HRM function of training is only stated as a footnote among other things (EC, 2015).
One the other hand, it is important to note that towards the concluding section of the EU action
plan for the CE (EC, 2015, p. 19), it is explicitly stated that the transitions to a CE will “require
a qualified workforce with specific skills, and opportunities for employment and social
dialogue”. Furthermore, it is suggested that to develop the appropriate skills at all levels, this
will require support by education and training systems. Admittedly, the EU document is but
an action plan, which does not portray the actual activities relating to CE within organisations.
That said, in more recent studies on CE within organisations, it is observed that there is a
considerable absence of disclosures surrounding HR and the role of HRM (Geissdoerfer et al.,
2017). This view is worth taking note of -giving the importance of HR and HRM in realising
organisations’ objective, which remains to be empirically understood within the context of
3
CE. Therefore, this paper aims to provide both a managerial “HRM” perspective (i.e. the
people-centred practices adopted by managers to improve their organisation’s efficiency and
achieve performance targets or profitability). The paper also focuses on a critical perspective
(i.e. an analysis of happenings surrounding the management of people that are implicit and
unintended or the broader social outcomes of management action or inaction) on HR and the
role of HRM in organisations CE drives (Kerfoot & Knights, 2017).
By providing both managerial and critical perspectives on HR and the role of HRM at firm
level CE initiatives, the paper not only considers the immediate desires of managers (line
managers and HR managers inclusive) to seek the success of their organisations through
efficient and effective management of an organisations HR; but also the intended and
unintended consequences of management practice that relates to the organisations’ people. As
Kerfoot and Knights (2017, p. 160) noted, “critical approaches therefore brings to the surface
issues of management and aspects of organisational life that might otherwise go
unacknowledged or be denied”. This research endeavour is crucial as it is widely
acknowledged that HR and HRM could be significant cost and burden to an organisation, but
if appropriately managed could be invaluable to organisational sustainability (Huselid, 1995;
Kanter, 2003; Paauwe, 2004; Saini & Budhwar, 2008; Buller & McEvoy, 2012). Therefore,
this research intends to address the following research objective:
To establish how HR and the HRM function are captured within CE business cases.
The above research question will be empirically addressed in this study through the
examination of six case study organisations implementing CE. Subsequent sections of this
paper will be structured as follow: a literature review on key themes found within this study,
followed by a methodology section, research findings and discussion and conclusion.
Circular Economy (CE)
Following the review of 114 CE definitions, Kirchherr, Reike and Hekkert (2017, pp.224-225)
defines CE as “an economic system that is based on business models which replace the ‘end-
of-life’ concept with reducing (the rethinking and/or redesign of production and/or process to
minimise and/or prevent resource use and/or preservation of natural capital). Alternatively, it
entails reusing (the exclusion of waste through closing the loop of the product and/or process
lifecycle via repair and refurbishment of resources), recycling (remanufacturing and/or reuse of
waste) and recovering materials in production/distribution and consumption processes
(recovery of energy perhaps through incineration). Thus, it means “operating at the micro level
(products, companies, consumers), meso level (eco-industrial parks) and macro level (city,
region, nation and beyond), with the aim to accomplish sustainable development, which implies
creating environmental quality, economic prosperity and social equity, to the benefit of current
and future generations” (Kirchherr et al., 2017, p. 225).
This definition of CE is perhaps the most holistic, thorough and yet easy to comprehend, the
authors of this paper found in the CE literature. Here is why: the definition does not only capture
the conceptualisation of CE as an economic system, which is common amongst most of the
other definitions of CE (e.g. Geng & Doberstein, 2008; Geissdoerfer et al., 2017; EMF, 2020).
It also captures what is otherwise known as the 4R’s of CE (reduce, reuse, recycle and recover).
Rather than CE being simply considered as an economic system the nitty-gritty of the 4R’s in
CE is sometimes left out by other authors who define CE, or occasionally they include the first
4
3R’s (e.g. Reh, 2013; Ghisellini, Cialani, & Ulgiati, 2016; Jabbour et al., 2019). It is also
imperative to state that the 4R’s of CE included in the definition of CE by Kirchherr et al. are
based on their levels of importance, i.e. the ultimate goal of CE is reducing and the least
objective recovery. Similar views are shared by EC (2008); Webster (2015); Potting, Hekkert,
Worrell and Hanemaaijer (2017), noting that without the usage of a resource in the first instance
there will be no need for recovery. Also, Kirchherr et al.’s definition of CE acknowledges that
CE operates at three deferent levels; micro, meso, macro (this paper will be focusing on the
micro/organisational level, although occasionally within the discussions in this study the role of
HRM in CE at the meso and macro level will be highlighted).
HR and HRM
HR simply refers to all individuals working in and or for organisations. While HRM involves
all aspects of controlling and directing individuals employed by organisations, its practices
include but not limited to recruitment and selection, training and development, performance and
pay, job evaluation and appraisal, health and safety, employee relations and collective
negotiations among others (Kerfoot & Knights, 2017). HRM practices are common in most
organisations, although, the theoretical accounts on the practice and the perceptions of HR
within organisations could be described along the line of unitarist, pluralist, hard and soft
approaches (Storey, 1989; Collings & Wood, 2009).
Unitarist account of HR and HRM assumes that all members of the organisation share the views
of top management and that conflict should be seen as a disease instead of a reflection of the
difference in individual views and interest. Pluralist focus is the exact opposite of unitarist
notions of HR and HRM within organisations. It accepts differences and conflict of interest by
the different stakeholders that interact with a business these might include, for example,
employees, shareholders, governments, and suppliers (Kerfoot & Knights, 2017). Hard HRM is
based on the premise that HR is similar to other inanimate assets at the organisation's disposal,
and as such, it should be exploited to yield maximum returns. On the other hand, soft HRM,
hinges on the proposition on the difference between HR and other resources found within
organisations and that the success of organisations depends on their ability to harness the
creative and productive capabilities of employees by treating them more humanely (Collings &
Wood, 2009). It is argued that each of these approaches to HR and HRM all have their
advantages and disadvantages as there is no one best way in handling HR and HRM issues
found within an organisation (Collings & Wood, 2009). Therefore, organisations frequently
adopt one of these methods, or a combination of methods to suit their context, their current
organisational development phase and general requirements (Storey, 1989; Kerfoot & Knights,
2017).
HR and the role HRM within CE organisations
Perhaps already obvious from preceding paragraphs in this paper on HR and the role of HRM
within CE organisation is that it is in its conceptual stages and remains rather unclear. For
example, not only has it been mentioned that by making CE transitions, organisations will
require qualified workers with specific skills, CE also has the potential to create new
opportunities for employment and social dialogue (EC, 2015). According to Geissdoerfer et
al. (2017), while EC views on CE are shared; there remains a limited consideration given to
social wellbeing by most CE authors. They assert that there is no clear understanding as to the
5
extent to which CE might contribute to subjective wellbeing – an issue that is further explored
within this paper. Worst still, Kichherr et al. (2017) posit a confirmation following an
assessment of over a hundred scholarly writings on CE, that the current body of knowledge
and understandings of CE mostly neglect the social aspects. In addressing the shortfall on this
research phenomenon, Jabbour et al. (2019) employed a ‘green’ approach to consider HR and
the role of HRM in CE organisations – by providing a conceptual framework demonstrating
the possible intersection/interactions between HR and the role of HRM as well as theoretical
frameworks in which studies on HR and the role of HRM at firm level CE practices could be
hinged.
Within Jabbour et al.’s (2019) proposed conceptual framework, it is assumed that CE-enabling
HRM could be associated with GHRM practices and dimensions, which include recruitment
and selection, training, performance assessment and rewards, culture (a climate at work
whereby concerns for the environment intensely influence employee workplace behaviour),
empowerment and teamwork. According to Jabbour et al. (2019), the practices and dimensions
of HR and HRM hypothesised to enable organisational CE practices might be facilitated by
top management commitment, managerial leadership, and employee motivation. Furthermore,
Jabbour et al. (2019) suggest that the foundations for considering HR and the role of HRM
within CE organisations are grounded on two theories underpinning HR and the role of HRM
within organisations. The first is Stakeholder Theory (ST), which holds that organisations are
made up of different groups of stakeholders including managers, employees, shareholders,
customers and the wider public, hence, organisations must consider their various interest in
the formulation and implementation of policies. The second theory is the Resource-Based
View (RBV), which asserts that an organisation achieves competitive advantage when its
resource is valuable, rare and costly or difficult to imitate, with HRM having a significant role
to play in ensuring that the organisation’s HR is in line with this criteria. In addition, Guest
(1987) and Armstrong and Taylor (2017) collaborated that both ST and RBV are strong
theoretical bases for HR and the role of HRM within organisations, hence the adoption of
these theories for this current research. Most importantly, the need for subsequent empirical
research to be conducted to address this current gap in knowledge has been echoed in the
extant literature (EC, 2015; Geissdoerfer et al. 2017; Kichherr et al. 2017; Jabbour et al. 2019),
for which this research is preoccupied with.
Methodology
The study adopts a case study research approach (Eisenhardt, 1989; Creswell, 2013; Yin,
2014) in providing a critical account of the role of HR and HRM within CE organisations.
The choice of case study approach for this research is based on its tenets of enabling
researchers to address the enquiries sought in the study (Creswell, 2013). The validity of this
approach in exploring organisational CE practice was echoed in the case studies on CE used
in this current study, which essentially adopted a case study research approach (see de Mattos
& de Albuquerque, 2018). Also, Jabbour et al.’s (2019) study recommended that future
research into firm-level CE operations should adopt a case study research approach, to help
deepen scholarship/insight into firm operations. Case study research could involve single or
multiple organisations or cases (Yin, 2014). In the selection of cases, sampling strategies are
required. Bryman and Bell (2011) describes sampling strategy as a method used in the
selection of samples from a given population. In the case of this research, it involves all
6
organisations adopting CE principles within their operations. Given that it is implausible to
determine all organisations adopting CE principles in their operations, this study has
employed a non-probability sampling strategy (Blaikie, 2010).
In specific, this study adopted convenience and purposive non-probability sampling
techniques in selecting case studies (Creswell, 2013; Kumar, 2014). All of the six cases (see
table 2 below) used in this study were derived from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF)
case study database (EMF, 2017, 2019). The six cases represent about 10 per cent of the cases
found in the database on the day, in which 63 cases were identified. Only six of the cases are
used within this study as they formed the bases of a pilot study of the current research focusing
on HR/HRM and CE, from which this paper is written. Following this paper, all 63 cases and
perhaps more (as cases are continuously added to the database) will be examined for a broader
account into HR/HRM in firm-level CE operations. While the researchers acknowledged that
the analysis of the case studies influences the findings of this (pilot) study; this
acknowledgement is not intended to diminish the novelty and contribution realised in this
scholarship, which specifically explored HR/HRM in organisations CE practice. Thus, the
acknowledgement asserts that the paper provides a snapshot of the current state on how HR
and the HRM function are represented and portrayed within CE business cases.
According to Yin (2014), through mechanics of a pilot study, researchers can refine their data
collection plans, the data gathering instruments and procedures, to enhance the overall
outcome of the study. Besides, Thabane et al. (2010) encourage the publication of results from
pilot studies, which can provide relevant information on the feasibility of research to the
research community, thereby possibly saving resources and effort being spent by other
researchers on studies that might not be feasible. This adds to the researchers’ ethical and
scientific duty to publish the results of all research endeavour (Thabane et al. 2010).
Furthermore, it is also essential to note that the EMF – from where these cases studies are
selected for this research – is considered a critical and thought-leading stakeholder in the
development and propagation of organisational CE discourse globally (EMF, 2017, 2019).
This viewpoint is not only shared by numerous CE scholars (Geissdoerfer et al., 2017; Jabbour
et al., 2019; Kichherr et al.,2017). Importantly, based on extant literature's overview of CE
and the credibility of the EMF data source, the researchers believe that this approach to
deriving critical perspectives to organisational modus operandi to CE operations is novel to
this research. Having discussed the research approach and the source of the research data for
this research it is also crucial to describe the method of data analysis adopted for this research
(see table 1, for a brief description of the stages adopted in analysing the data).
7
Table 1: Analytical process
Note: The analytical process of the case study data for this research described in table 1 is
informed by Eisenhardt (1989); Braun and Clarke (2006); Creswell, 2013; and Kichherr et al.
(2017).
It is widely agreed by researchers that there is no codified or broadly accepted approach to the
analysis of data generated from case studies (Eisenhardt, 1989; Creswell, 2013). However, the
suggestions put forward and found in the case study methodological literature include, first,
the within-case analysis and provision of an individual case report or narrative (Eisenhardt,
1989; Yin, 2014). The write-ups from the within-case analysis are primarily descriptive but are
considered central to the generation of insights, as it allows for “unique patterns to each case
to emerge before investigators push to generalise patterns across cases” (Eisenhardt, 1989, p.
540). This is followed by the cross-case analysis, the search for patterns across cases and search
for similarities and differences between cases (Eisenhardt, 1989; Yin, 2014). This research is
very much akin to building theory from the case study analysis (Eisenhardt, 1989), to fill the
current research gap of a lack of critical and empirical studies on HR and the role of HRM
within firm-level CE operation. However, being aware of the previous conceptualisations of
CE, HR and the role of HRM in CE organisations and organisations in general, a deductive
research approach (Bryman & Bell, 2011) is adopted in this research, to empirically test the
theories postulated in literature by previous researchers on the subject as these theories are not
yet empirically grounded.
A more nuanced expression of the approach to the analysis of the case study data adopted in
this research is the description of qualitative analysis of case study data by Creswell (2013),
which mirrors Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic framework. Creswell (2013) states that the
key phases of analysing qualitative data as operationalised in this research starts with
familiarisation with data through reading and re-reading the data and noting down initial ideas.
Stage Actions taken
1. Familiarisation with
the data
Reading and re-reading the case studies documents and noting down
initial ideas
2. Developing the
initial coding
framework
Development of initial coding framework (including coding rules), based
upon researchers’ practical knowledge on the topic and previous studies
on HR, HRM, and CE, most of which have been captured in the literature
review section of this paper.
3. Coding the data Independent coding of textual data found within the case study
documents systematically, to relevant codes case by case. Also,
searching for additional possible coding dimensions within the cases
during coding, and patterns across cases
4. Comparison of
coding results
Discussion of coded data that at least one coder did not find straight-
forward to code based on initial coding rules and discussion of differing
results; modification of coding rules based on this discussion; discussion
on and alignment regarding additional coding dimensions for the coding
framework (available on request)
5. Second-round of
coding
Independent coding of case study data by both coders based on revised
coding framework
6. Comparison of
coding results
Discussion of differing results; finalisation of results (final results can
include divergent results)
7. Producing the
report
Selecting vivid and compelling extract examples, the final analysis of
selected extracts from the case studies, relating the analysis to the
research question and literature, and the production of a scholarly report
of the analysis, i.e. this paper.
8
Then coding the research data follows, which involves reducing the data into meaningful
segments and assigning labels to the segments (codes), and subsequently, the combination of
these codes into broader themes (categorical aggregation) (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Creswell
(2013) goes on to state that after coding and categorical aggregation of the data from the cases,
the themes and inherent codes are then exhibited to allow for comparisons – with the possibility
of including the theoretical/conceptual framework from the literature review in the evaluations
between the themes and inherent codes from the different cases (Braun and Clarke, 2006).
These are all essential features of qualitative data analysis, which guide the analysis of the
research data for this research (Creswell, 2013). In practical terms, the analytical process of
this research involved familiarisation with data from all six organisational case studies from
the EMF database on firm-level CE operations. Data on each of the case study organisations
were coded individually by two members of the research team before each of these codes were
combined with similar codes to form themes of the study, which according to Eisenhardt
(1989), can enhance credibility in the overall research findings.
Findings and Discussion
Findings of this study begin with table 2, which contains the names of businesses whose CE
business operations and description have been examined for this research.
Table 2: Names of Case Organisation and a brief description of their CE operations.
Note: The pseudonym in parentheses “()” are the names that the case organisations will be
referred to in subsequent parts of this paper. The purpose of the table is to provide a background
to the business cases, in order to pave way for the themes of findings, which are presented next.
Case
organisations
Brief description of case organisations CE operations
Winnow (Case
A)
This case organisation provides a system by which commercial kitchens can
reduce food waste and carbon emissions as the system collects information on
food waste generated by commercial kitchens, helping them plan better and
make better decisions on the amount of food prepared for customers.
Google (Case B) This case provides an overview as to how the case organisation adopts CE in
the management of its hardware found in its data centres. The CE practices
discussed involves reduce, reuse and recycling of parts used in the operations
of data centres, which has resulted in cost avoidance and energy efficiency.
Coca Cola
Enterprises (Case
C)
The case captures efforts to maximise the use and value of the plastics used in
the production of bottles by the case organisation through recycling –
improving the environmental impact of the case organisations operations.
Danone-Evian
(Case D)
The case highlights the initiative embarked upon by the case study organisation
to preserve the purity of the water supply for its bottled water production, while
it supports other activities in the catchment (area of production). The CE
operation centres on the recovery of energy from waste. Local waste is
collected through a collection scheme and converted to valuable raw material
via an anaerobic digestion plant which produces biogas and transforms
hazardous raw manure to benign regenerating bio-solids.
The Plant (Case
F)
This business case demonstrates the activities of a collaborative community of
food production businesses to repurpose and capture more value from the by-
products of their production activities for reuse in further production of food
products and energy.
HP Instant Ink
(Case G)
The case looks at how the case organisation uses technology (specifically,
Internet of things) to increase cartridge recovery and recycling. The model or
process involves the use of printers connected to the internet which informs the
case organisation to send customers replacement cartridges when customer ink
is close to running out. The replacement cartridges are sent with pre-paid
envelopes for customers to use in returning used cartridges.
9
CE Operations within Case Study Organisations
It can be gleaned (from table 2) that all six case study organisations are engaged in CE
operations, although at different levels or in various forms. These widely capture the most
crucial objective of CE, which is CE as an economic system that is based on business models,
which replace the current ‘end-of-life’ concept by reducing both material and natural resources
used in the production process (Ghisellini et al., 2016; Kirchherr et al., 2017). Within the data
set evaluated for this research, considerable text extracts were relevant and included into the
thematic theme ‘reduce’, which demonstrated that CE operations in five of the case study
organisations except for one (Case D) are broadly captured. In Case A for example, the
importance of reducing material and natural resource expended as a result of production was
highlighted, to justify the need for organisations to embrace CE operations. Phrase such as
“each year an estimated USD 100 billion worth of food is thrown away by the hospitality
industry, mainly due to overproduction (Case A) demonstrate this contention. Similarly, “there
are huge benefits in developing tools that help address this and therefore reduce the many
issues associated with food waste”. Also, when mentioning the result of Case A’s product in
aiding organisations reduce resource use: “The result - restaurants that use this system have
cut food waste by between 40 - 70%, leading to increases profit margins by 50% or more as
well as reducing carbon emissions” (Case A).
A similar trend of CE aimed at reducing resource use by organisations was also identified in
Cases B, C, E and G. In (Case G), one of the statements that reflect that CE effort enables the
organisation to reduce its resource use relates to redesign of production: “Cartridge design and
durability is improved to facilitate the business model; packaging use is reduced, eliminating
up to 57% of waste”. Beyond reduce, the other 3R’s (Kircherr et al., 2017; Potting et al., 2017)
of CE operations are represented and portrayed within the CE business data set analysed for
this research, although when compared to ‘reduce’, their representation is minimal and in
varied proportions. Following from ‘reduce’, ‘recycle’ is the next most common objective of
CE operations within the Case organisations. There were illustrations for this in three business
cases (Case B, Case C, Case F) evaluated for this research. Kircherr et al. (2017), describes
recycling as one of the fundamental CE operations adopted by CE organisations, and it entails
the remanufacturing and reuse of waste. Within the business cases analysed, there are various
text extracts which demonstrate the initiatives by several case organisations to ‘recycle’. These
examples are captured in the following extracts below:
“In 2015, 19% of servers Google deployed were remanufactured machines” (Case B).
“To date, Continuum has already supplied CCE with enough high quality rPET to
include 25% rPET in all its plastic bottles in Great Britain. The facility also recycled
around 15 million bottles collected at the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic
Games, returning them to the shelves as new bottles within six weeks” (Case C).
“HP’s Instant Ink is an IoT enabled subscription model for individuals and small
businesses that increases cartridge recovery and recycling” (Case F)
Short phrases such as “19% of servers Google deployed were remanufactured machines” (Case
B), “the facility also recycled around 15 million bottles collected at the London 2012…” (Case
10
C) and “increases cartridge recovery and recycling” (Case F) in the above clusters denote that
recycling forms a significant part of CE operations within three of the case study organisations
explored. This provision tallies with Webster’s (2015), and EC’s (2015) contention on the
significance of recycling within organisations CE operations.
The third most dominant CE operational objective from the case studies was ‘reuse’, which
Kirchherr et al. (2017) define within the context of CE business operations as the exclusion of
waste through closing the loop of the product and/or process lifecycle via repair and
refurbishment of resources. The ‘reuse’ imperative of CE at firm level CE operations was
identified in two of the six business cases reviewed for this study: Case B and Case F. From
the analysis of the CE operations of Case B and Case F, ‘reuse’ was extensively captured in
the following clusters:
“Refurbish/remanufacture: Once servers from data centers are decommissioned, they
are sent back to the central hub. At the hub servers are dismantled and de-kitted to their
usable components (CPU, motherboard, Flash devices, hard disks, memory modules
and other components). After quality inspection, components are stored to be reused as
refurbished inventory” (Case B).
“The model successfully demonstrates a component recovery and recycling programme
in the consumer electronics sector, as it enables HP to put their cartridges through
multiple uses” (Case F).
Text such as “components are stored to be reused as refurbished inventory” (Case B), and “it
enables HP to put their cartridges through multiple uses” (Case F) all demonstrate that the
reuse of production parts and materials is part of firms CE operations, which are consistent
with the views held in extant literature (Kichherr et al., 2017) particularly in view of the
assumption that “reuse by another customer of discarded product which is still in good
condition and fulfils its original function” (Potting et al., 2017, p.5).
Last but not least, ‘recover’ form part of the themes on CE operations within the case studies.
Recovery of materials in the production/distribution and consumption processes (such as the
recovery of energy through incineration) is also one of the practices which can be identified
within firm-level CE operations (Kichherr et al., 2017; Potting et al., 2017). Among the case
studies, recovery was only detected in one. Illustrations on recovery can be found in Case D’s
CE operations, excerpts that represent recovery are:
“Danone initiated a collection scheme and built an anaerobic digestion plant that
produces biogas and converts hazardous raw manure to benign but regenerating bio-
solids” (Case D).
“At the heart of the project is the construction of a methanisation unit that produces
energy and digestate out of local agricultural effluents. The facility was launched in
2016, producing almost 1 million m3 of biogas each year, which is then refined to
biomethane and injected into the local gas network” (Case D).
11
CE operations of recovery are captured in the above extracts. Short phrases and semantics such
as “built an anaerobic digestion” and “construction of a methanisation unit” (Case D) are
clear instances of how the organisation is embracing the ‘recover’ model of CE. These extracts
highlight the process by which Case D’s CE operations involves a practice of collecting
hazardous raw manure that can potentially contaminate its productions. Thus, through
methanisation using anaerobic digestion plant, biogas and biosolids can be generated as energy
and vital raw materials for subsequent production – a CE practice that is consistent with the
views on recovery – portrayed in the extant literature (Kichherr et al., 2017; Potting et al.,
2017). With all of the case study organisations confirmed to adopt CE in their operations in
one form or another and varied dimensions (Reduce 5:1; Recycle 3:3; Reuse 2:4; Recover 1:5),
this evidence supports the points made by previous CE authors (EC, 2008; Webster 2015;
Potting et al., 2017; Kichherr et al., 2017) that the ultimate goal of CE is focused on ‘reduce’.
Thus, this entails rethinking and/or redesign of production and/or process to minimise and/or
prevent resource use and/or preservation of natural capital, rather than recovery, because,
without the usage of a resource in the first instance, there will be no need for recovery. In
summary, confirming that the case organisations incorporated in this research adopt CE within
their operations forms only a part of the current research endeavour towards understanding HR
and HRM in organisations CE pursuits.
HRM Function vs Other Functional Areas
From the review of the six case study organisations, it is evident that functional areas within
CE organisations are given minimal consideration/discussion within CE business cases.
However, it is also apparent that within the case studies that certain organisational functional
areas get more considerations compared to others – even among organisations where these
concerns are given minimal considerations. This contradicts views taken by previous CE
authors (Batista, Gong, Pereira, Jia & Bittar 2019; Jabbour et al.,2019) – as demonstrated in
the EMF businesses cases for current organisational functional areas. These organisational
functional areas include SCM (Batista et al., 2019), procurement (EC, 2015), product or
process redesign (EC, 2015), HRM (Alese, 2018; Jabbour et al., 2019) and marketing (EMF,
2015). The organisational functional areas from the business cases analysed for this study are
covered in the following excerpts captured in table 3:
Table 3: Excerpts from business cases on organisational functional areas
Organisatio
nal
functional
areas
Case
organi
sation
s
Excerpts
SCM Case A “As in the building sector, new IT applications may make it possible to
track inefficiencies across the (food) supply chain, enabling much better
resource monitoring and management”
Case B “Google’s supply chain for servers (Product) consists of components that
make a server including: CPU, Motherboard, Flash Devices, Hard Disks,
Memory Modules and other components. Since Google manages the
manufacturing and assembly operations of its custom built servers, Google
is the Product Manufacturer in Google’s server supply chain.”
12
“Multiple programs and processes within Google’s Data Center
Operations and Supply Chain groups apply key circular economy
strategies”
Case F “The more widespread use of this technology is now allowing performance
models - where you pay for the performance of a product rather than
owning it - to trickle down to small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME)
customers and even individuals, where previously tracking and logistics
were prohibitively costly or inconvenient.”
“The model successfully demonstrates a component recovery and recycling
programme in the consumer electronics sector, as it enables HP to put their
cartridges through multiple uses.”
“The connected printer notifies HP when the cartridge is about to run dry
and signals to deliver a new one without the subscriber having to interact.
Empty cartridges are collected and returned to HP as part of a ‘closed-
loop’ recycling programme.”
Procurement X X
Product and
process
design
Case A “Winnow has devised a simple way of collecting data on food waste in
commercial kitchens, leading to better decision making in food preparation
and increasing awareness in kitchen staff.”
“In the first few weeks of the analysis period, clients are requested to
collect data without modifying behaviour, to establish a baseline for future
comparison.”
“To add more meaning to this basic measurement, Winnow requests
information on food sales during the same time period, so that waste can
be normalised against sales, creating a more powerful metric that can be
related to ROI and profits.”
Case B “These practices combined with Google’s circular approach to optimising
end of life of servers based on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) principles
have resulted in hundreds of millions per year in cost avoidance.”
“Google achieves high utilisation of resources by sharing machines
through compute and storage shared services that serve all product areas
(as opposed to each product area having its own dedicated machines).”
“Much of our infrastructure is custom designed, from our own high voltage
substations, to the on-site electrical distribution systems, to the proprietary
cooling systems - all working in conjunction and optimised to provide the
highest performance and lowest total cost of ownership computing
infrastructure, saving Google over $1 billion in our operations through
energy efficiency alone.”
Case C “Coca Cola Enterprises is committed to maximising the usage and value
of the plastics used in bottle production. To help achieve this ambition
Coca Cola invested in Continuum Recycling; a plastics reprocessing
facility for collecting and reprocessing plastics as a joint venture with ECO
Plastics.”
“Through interventions at each stage of the packaging chain (materials,
design, disposal, recovery and recycling), CCE is committed to maximising
the usage and value of the plastics used in bottle production.”
13
Case D “Danone initiated a collection scheme and built an
anaerobic digestion plant that produces biogas and converts hazardous
raw manure to benign but regenerating bio-solids.”
“value is cascaded from organic matter and residual bio-solids are
distributed to farmers closing the nutrient loop
and regenerating pastureland in the region.”
Case E “The Plant community is currently working on a system which allows them
to repurpose and capture more value from byproducts – e.g. spent grain
from the brewery is used as growing medium for mushrooms”
Case F “Cartridge design and durability is improved to facilitate the business
model; packaging use is reduced, eliminating up to 57% of waste”
“Collecting printer use data helps inform system designs, including
packaging and replenishment algorithms to minimise waste; and improve
serviceability, durability, and customer satisfaction”
HRM X X
Marketing
and sales
Case A “According to David Jackson, Head of Marketing for Winnow, one of the
most important benefits of collecting accurate data is that “it gives
businesses the confidence to go out and make public statements about
reducing food waste”.”
“For example, the technology has given a huge company like
IKEA, which serves 650 million meals each year, the quantitative basis to
launch and monitor a campaign that aims to reduce food waste by 50% by
the end of 2020.”
Case B “After utilising all internal avenues Google goes through a rigorous
process to ensure no proprietary Google technology resides on the
components before selling on the secondary market. Google works in close
collaboration with selected remarketing partners to look at various market
factors for resale… In 2015, Google resold nearly 2 million units into the
secondary market for reuse by other organisations”
Note: Text boxes where “X” has been inserted denotes that no text was found in the case
studies, which can be coded for the particular theme of the functional area focusing on
organisational engagement with CE.
Based on the extracts contained in the table, which represent codes and themes of
organisational functional areas in CE operation, it appears that the dominant function captured
within the six business cases is product/process design. Some of the short phrases that
excemplify this contention include: “has devised a simple way of collecting data on food
waste in commercial kitchens” (Case A), “much of our infrastructure is custom designed”
(Case B), and “collecting printer use data helps inform system designs” (Case C). As can be
gleaned from the case study analysis, the dominance of product/process design as an
organisational functional area that contributes to firm-level CE operations confirms EC’s
(2015) assertions on the importance of this particular function, for achieving organisational
CE objectives. According to EC (2015), through improved designs, organisational products
can be amenable to change as well as more durable, repairable and upgradable.
The next prominent theme analysed in the case studies is supply chain management (SCM),
14
which however is less noticeable when compared to product or process design. According to
Batista et al. (2018), the pursuit of CE objectives by organisations has SCM implications, and
as such, the SCM function within organisations has a role to play. The following short phrases
including “new IT applications may make it possible to track inefficiencies across the (food)
supply chain, enabling….resource monitoring and management” (Case A), “within Google’s
Data Center Operations and Supply Chain groups apply key circular economy strategies”
(Case B) and “signals to deliver a new one without the subscriber having to interact” (Case
F) collaborate Batista et al.’s (2018) viewpoint on SCM in CE firms.
The least prevalent organisational functional area described in the case studies analysed for
this study are marketing and sales. However, this functional area fared better when compared
to others such as HRM and Procurement – see table 3, where excerpts representative of the
various functional areas captured during the analysis are referred to. EC (2015) and other CE
authors such as Webster (2015) view that CE operations within organisations inform how
businesses go about marketing and sales of their product, which places the onus on the
organisational functional areas of marketing and sales. This view is supported by the following
text excerpts from the analysis: “it gives businesses the confidence to go out and make public
statements about reducing food waste” (Case A) and “collaboration with selected
remarketing partners to look at various market factors for resale… In 2015, Google resold
nearly 2 million units into the secondary market for reuse by other organisations” (Case B).
Webster (2015) further points out that the products sold by CE organisations are amenable to
maintenance, their value increased by product-life extension, after which, their materials can
be recovered as useful components and sub-assemblies, which consecutively - can be
refurbished, reused and improved.
The lack of textual evidence from the business cases analysed to support the claim made by
EC (2015) on the possible functional role of procurement in contributing to the realisation of
organisations CE objectives was unsurprising to the researchers. This is considering that
contributions of procurement as an organisational function at firm level CE operations was
highlighted in the context of public sector procurement function as opposed to within the
private sector where all the cases analysed within this study are centred. That said, the absence
of the HRM function following from the analysis of firm-level CE activities in this study was
somewhat surprising, especially, given the assertions of notable authors such as EC (2015)
and Jabbour et al. (2019), on the possible importance of HRM as a functional area within firms
adopting CE in their practice.
Inter alia, the HRM function is charged with providing training to members of the
organisations charged with meeting the organisations CE goals (EC, 2015), which is because,
as EC (2015, p. 19) points out, the operations of the CE “will require a qualified workforce
with specific skills, and opportunities for employment and social dialogue”. In support of
EC’s (2015) view, the works of prominent HR authors such as Armstrong and Taylor (2017)
and Kerfoot and Knights (2017) contend that training is one of the key responsibilities of the
HRM function within organisations, which enable employees to develop relevant skills in
meeting organisational objectives. Jabbour et al. (2019) go beyond mentioning training in their
conceptual paper on HR and the role of HRM function within CE organisations, to suggest
that the HRM function could contribute to organisations CE drives through recruitment and
selection, performance assessment and reward, and by ensuring that opportunities for
15
employee empowerment and teamwork are provided where possible. All of these are hinged
on the stakeholder view and RBV of HR and the HRM function within organisation (Jabbour
et al., 2019).
Managerial vs Critical Perspectives of HR and HRM within CE Business Cases
Compared to managerial perspectives, which was non-existent in the analysis and discussion,
accounts on the critical perspective were present in four of the CE business cases evaluated
for this research. According to Kerfoot and Knights (2017), the critical perspective of HR and
HRM within organisations centres on the dynamic of people’s management. The critical
perspective of HR and HRM within the CE business cases analysed for this study are captured
in the following excerpts:
“Internally, the Continuum facility is now the benchmark for best practice across the
entire Coca-Cola System. And thirty new skilled jobs have also been created for the
local area as a result of the partnership.” (Case C)
“11 jobs created…The local municipality previously had to export green waste and
kitchen waste generated from schools out of the territory, which had both financial cost
as well as carbon emission implications. However once the methanisation unit became
operational, long distance transportation of organic waste was no longer required, as
it could be processed locally. The project also benefits the regional economy through
the creation of local jobs” (Case D).
“What makes this smarter - Winnow analytics correlates food waste to sales directly
connecting behaviour changes to increased profits…The unexpected bonus? About
50% of workers involved in food production in IKEA have been inspired to reduce food
waste when they return home” (Case A).
“is supporting Google to build on existing practices and embed circular economic
principles into the fabric of Google’s infrastructure, operations and culture.” (Case B)
“Everyone is a winner…Farmers benefit from a 60% reduction in fertiliser expenses,
regular advice from experts on grassland management, better relations with
neighbours (as digestate is odourless, compared to pungent raw manure) and a reduced
workload.” (Case D)
Short phrases such as “thirty new skilled jobs have also been created” (Case, C), and “11 jobs
created…benefits the regional economy through the creation of local jobs” (Case D),
demonstrates how the CE operations of some of the organisations contribute to the creation of
jobs. Indeed, identifying that firm-level CE operations results in job creation within this study
confirms the views of EC (2015) that CE transitions lead to opportunities for employment.
Besides, the critical perspective on HR and the role of HRM within the CE operations of
organisations can be captured in the following phrases: “been inspired to reduce food waste
when they return home” (Case A), and “better relations with neighbours… and a reduced
workload” (Case D), which perhaps contradicts Geissdoerfer et al.’s (2017) assertions that
there is no clear understanding as to the extent to which CE might contribute to subjective
16
wellbeing. On the other hand, considering that there is an appropriation of a phrase such as
“and embed circular economic principles into the fabric of Google’s infrastructure, operations
and culture” (Case D) in one of cases – collaborates Jabbour et al.’s (2019) submission that
the transitions of an organisation from linear economic principles to CE principles are
implanted in an organisation’s culture. Admittedly, the representation and portrayal of a critical
perspective of HR and HRM within the business cases analysed were not evident in all the
business cases analysed for this study, but it was captured in most, which somewhat reiterates
the views put forward by Kichherr et al. (2017) that current body of knowledge and
understanding of CE mostly neglect the social aspects.
Conclusion
This paper considers the social dimensions of the CE – specifically firm-level CE operations.
The paper aimed to address the current gap in CE dynamic through critical and empirical
evaluation on HR and the role of HRM in firm-level CE transitions. The overall effort was
achieved through the analysis of six business case studies on CE operations – guided by the
research objective, which focuses on how HR and the HRM function are captured within CE
business cases. Based on the findings of this research relative to other organisational
functional areas such as product and process design, marketing and sales, and SCM, the case
studies analysis indicate that HRM as an organisational function is currently not captured
within organisational CE business concern. Similarly, procurement, which is another
important organisational function, has not been given attention in the CE business cases
analysed for this research.
Nonetheless, compared to the managerial perspectives of HR and the role of HRM, the case
studies analysis captured the critical perspective of HR and HRM in four of the business cases.
This was demonstrated in terms of job creation, a change in the behaviour of employees at
home, and (in one of the CE business cases) better relations with neighbours (in one
community). Lastly, with regards to the critical perspective of HR and HRM within CE
transitions in organisations, a change in organisational culture is highlighted in one of the
business cases. Both the findings on managerial and critical perspectives of HR and HRM
within CE business cases are potentially vital contributions to the current body of scholarship
on HR and the role HRM at firm-level CE pursuit, particularly, given that previous studies on
this phenomenon were not empirically/critically grounded (EU, 2015; Geissdoerfer et al.
2017; Jabbour et al. 2019), which are implications of this current study.
While there are implications for this study; it is also important to highlight its limitations. First
is the research methodology, which involves the use of primary data – sourced via a secondary
source. For instance, the data was sourced through EMF database, which contains numerous
CE business cases using primary data. Although the EMF is widely viewed as a thought-
leading organisation in the development and propagation of organisational CE practices across
the globe; it is not entirely possible to defend the assumption that what the platform covers
are not entirely the views of EMF and the collaborating organisations. Hence more holistic
viewpoints involving more participants would help deepen scholarship on organisational CE
dynamic. Secondly, the findings and discussions presented in this paper are only focused on
six business cases (ten per cent) found within the EMF database on the 20th of December
2019, and thus, a broader analysis of all the cases found within the database might provide
alternative views. Nonetheless, as the researchers hinted, a subsequent paper on this study will
involve analysis of all the business cases found in the database. Also, the researchers plan to
adopt multiple methods of data collection to enhance the validity of the overall outcomes of
17
discourse on this phenomenon.
18
References
Alese, N. (2018). Human Resources Management in the Circular Economy - Erasmus+ KA2.
Retrieved from ttps://epale.ec.europa.eu/en/partner-search/requests/human-resources-
management-circular-economy-erasmus-ka2 (Accessed 20/12/19).
Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2017). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource
Management Practice (14th ed.). London: Kogan Page Publishers.
Batista, L., Gong, Y., Pereira, S., Jia, F., & Bittar, A. (2019). Circular supply chains in
emerging economies–a comparative study of packaging recovery ecosystems in China and
Brazil. International Journal of Production Research, 57(23), 7248-7268.
Blaikie, N. (2010). Designing Social Research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research
in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and
performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human resource management review, 22(1), 43-56.
Collings, D. G., & Wood, G. (2009). Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach.
London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
de Mattos, C. A., & de Albuquerque, T. L. M. (2018). Enabling factors and strategies for the
transition toward a circular economy (CE). Sustainability, 10(12), 1-18.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017, 2019). Case studies. Retrieved from
https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/case-studies. (Accessed 20/12/19).
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2020). Learning Path: The Circular Economy in Detail.
Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/explore/the-circular-economy-in-
detail (Accessed 20/01/20).
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of
Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.
European Commission (2015). Closing the loop—An EU action plan for the Circular
Economy (COM/2015/0614 final). Retrieved from https://eur-
lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7-
01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (Accessed 20/12/19).
European Commission (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council on the 19th of November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directive
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular
Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
19
Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B. (2008). Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges
and opportunities for achieving'leapfrog development'. The International Journal of
Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(3), 231-239.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected
transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 114, 11-32.
Guest, D. E. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations [1]. Journal of
Management Studies, 24(5), 503-521.
Guest, D. E. (1990). Human resource management and the American dream. Journal of
Management Studies, 27(4), 377-397.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,
productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management journal, 38(3),
635-672.
Jabbour, C. J. C., Sarkis, J., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., Singh, S. K.,
Grebinevych, O., ... & Godinho Filho, M. (2019). Who is in charge? A review and a research
agenda on the ‘human side’ of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222
(2019), 793 -801.
Kanter, R. M. (2003). Foreword. In M. Effron, R. Gandossy & M. Goldsmith (Eds.), Human
Resources in the 21st Century (pp. vii-xii). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualising the circular economy: An
analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 127, 221-232.
Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.).
London: Sage.
McKinsey (2017). Mapping the benefits of a circular economy. Retrieved from
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/mapping-the-
benefits-of-a-circular-economy# (Accessed 21/01/20).
Paauwe, J. (2004). Human resource management and performance: Achieving longterm
viability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potting, J., Hekkert, M. P., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy:
measuring innovation in the product chain. The Hague: PBL Publishers
Keenoy, T. (1990). HRM: a case of the wolf in sheep’s clothing?. Personnel Review, 19(2),
3-9.
Kerfoot, D., & Knights, D. (2017). Managing people: Contexts of HRM, diversity and social
inequality. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Introducing Organisational Behaviour and
Management (3rd ed., pp. 158 – 197). Andover: Annabel Ainscow.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualising the circular economy: An
analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 127, 221-232.
20
Legge, K. (1989). Human Resource Management: A critical analysis. In J. Storey (Ed.), New
Perspectives on Human Resource Management (pp. 19 – 40). London: Routledge.
Legge, K. (2005). Human Resource Management – Rhetorics and Realities (Anniversary
ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Reh, L. (2013). Process engineering in circular economy. Particuology, 11(2), 119-133.
Saini, D. S., & Budhwar, P. S. (2008). Managing the human resource in Indian SMEs: The
role of indigenous realities. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 417-434.
Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435-438.
Storey, J. (1989). Introduction: From personnel management to human resource management.
In J. Storey (Ed.), New perspectives on Human Resource Management (pp 1-18). London:
Routledge.
Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., ... & Goldsmith, C. H.
(2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC medical research
methodology, 10(1), 1-10.
Webster, K. (2015). The circular economy: A wealth of flows. Isle of Wight: Ellen MacArthur
Foundation Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and method (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.