Hydraulic Fracturing
60 Years of Hydraulic Fracturing1949 to 2010 On March 17, 1949, a team comprised of Stanolind Oil Company and Halliburton personnel converged on a well about 12 miles east of Duncan, OK, to perform the first commercial application of hydraulic fracturing. Later the same day, Halliburton and Stanolind personnel fractured another well near Holliday, TX. The technique had been developed and patented by Stanolind (later known as Pan American Oil Company, then Amoco, and now BP) and an exclusive license issued to Halliburton to perform the process. In 1953, the license was extended to all qualified service companies. Since that day in 1949, hydraulic fracturing has done more to increase recoverable reserves than any other technique, and is a “must” for commercial production from most North American reservoirs…
Hydraulic Fracturing – Essential Technology• Well over 1,500,000
wells hydraulically fractured (since 1949)
• >40,000 NA wells fractured in 2011
• > 125,000 NA fracture treatments in 2011
• > $20 Billion NA market
• Essential for most unconventional resources– Gas shales (and oil)– Tight sands
Stimulate the Well Optimize each stage with appropriate stimulation
design. Monitor Each Stage in real time
What Do Fractures Really Look Like?
Simple Fracture Complex Fracture
Complex FractureWith Fissure Opening
Complex FractureNetwork
Simple Fracture Complex Fracture
Complex FractureWith Fissure Opening
Complex FractureNetwork
SWN Wright 1-3 Model Geometry
10500
10750
11000
11250
11500
11750
12000
5 500GR_STGC
Logs : Wright1-3REPAIR.las
10500
10750
11000
11250
11500
11750
12000
Rocktype
FracproPT Layer Pro...
Shale
Bossier
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
Concentration of Proppant in Fracture (lb/ft²)
0 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.0
Proppant Concentration (lb/ft²)
500 m
Downhole Microseismic Monitoring
Treatment WellObservation Well
Typically 12-3C Level @ 40 ft
Observation DistanceDepends on Seismic Attenuation
Perforated Interval
• Microseismic Monitoring Is Applied Earthquake Seismology (Seismology 101)
– Based On Principles Known For Decades
– Has Been Used Since Mid-1970’s (Hot Dry Rock)
– Primary Difference Is The Use Of A Downhole Array
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
1 501 1001 1501 2001 2501 3001 3501 4001
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
Barnett Shale Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDsDeepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Mapped microseismic height for Barnett shale• Top: shallowest microseism; Bottom: deepest microseism• Aquifers: USGS deepest water wells by county
Smallest height growth at shallow depths
Large spikes are likely fault interactions
Archer Bosque BrownClay Cooke CulbersonDenton Eastland ErathHarmon Hill HoodJack Johnson MontaguePalo Pinto Parker ReevesSomervell Stephens TarrantWise
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1 101 201 301 401 501 601 701 801 901
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
Marcellus Shale Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDsDeepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Armstrong Belmont BradfordButler Cameron CentreClearfield Clinton DoddridgeElk Forest GreeneHarrison Lycoming MarshallMc Kean Nicholas PotterPutnam Schuyler SusquehannaTaylor Tioga UpshurWashington Westmoreland Wetzel
Mapped microseismic height for Marcellus shale• Top: shallowest microseism; Bottom: deepest microseism• Aquifers: USGS deepest water wells by county
Smallest height growth at shallow depths
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 101 201 301 401
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
Woodford Shale Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDs
Deepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Andrews AtokaBlaine CanadianCarter ClevelandCoal CulbersonGarfield HughesJohnston PittsburgReeves Winkler
Mapped microseismic height for Woodford shale• Top: shallowest microseism; Bottom: deepest microseism• Aquifers: USGS deepest water wells by county
Smallest height growth at shallow depths
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
140001 101 201 301 401 501 601 701
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
Eagle Ford Shale Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDsDeepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Atascosa Burleson
De Witt Dimmit
Fayette Frio
Gonzales Karnes
La Salle Live Oak
Maverick Mc Mullen
Webb
Mapped microseismic height for Eagle Ford shale• Top: shallowest microseism; Bottom: deepest microseism• Aquifers: USGS deepest water wells by county
Smallest height growth at shallow depths
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
140001 101 201 301 401 501 601 701
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
Eagle Ford Shale Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDsDeepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Atascosa Burleson
De Witt Dimmit
Fayette Frio
Gonzales Karnes
La Salle Live Oak
Maverick Mc Mullen
Webb
Mapped microseismic height for Niobrara• Top: shallowest microseism; Bottom: deepest microseism• Aquifers: USGS deepest water wells by county
Smallest height growth at shallow depths
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351 401 451 501
Dept
hs (f
t)
Frac Stages (sorted on Perf Midpoints)
DJ Basin (CO, WY) Mapped Frac Treatments/TVDsDeepest Water Well Depth Frac Top Perf Top Perf Mid Perf Btm Frac Btm
Adams
Laramie
Weld
Conclusions• Decades of study and monitoring of thousands of
fracture treatments have demonstrated:– Fracture treatments in shales do not grow into aquifers
• Microseismic data• Simple volumetric calculations
– Fracture growth vertically is inhibited by layering & interfaces
• Mineback, laboratory, numerical, and field studies– Fracture growth in the near-surface region is limited by
horizontal components• Tiltmeter data, stress measurements
– Faults can influence fracture growth, but do not provide pathways for fracture fluid to reach the surface
– From a mechanics perspective, hydraulic fracturing is safe!
Common Fracturing Chemicalstypically used at <0.1% concentration
Common Additives Used in Slick Water Fracturing
Composition CAS Number Percentage of shale fracs that use this additive. (This in NOT concentration)
Alternate Use
Friction Reducer Polyacrylamide 9003-05-8 Near 100% of all fracs use this additive
Adsorbent in baby diapers, flocculent in drinking water preparation
Biocide Glutaraldehyde 111-30-8 80% (decreasing) Medical disinfectant
Alternate Biocide Ozone, Chlorine dioxide UV,
10028-15-6 10049-04-4
20% (increasing) Disinfectant in municipal water supplies
Scale Inhibitor Phosphonate & polymers
6419-19-8 and others 10 – 25% of all fracs use this additive
Detergents and medical treatment for bone problems.
Surfactant Soaps, alchohols various 10 to 25% of all fracs use this additive
Dish soaps, cleaners