+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Hydroformylation of Propylene

Hydroformylation of Propylene

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: michelletang9
View: 233 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 4

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Hydroformylation of Propylene

    1/4

    Jourruxl of lkfolecular Catalysis, 63 (1990) 14

    Hydr oformylat ion of propylene to but yra ldehyde u singdichloro-bis(salicylaldehyde)-o-phenylenediiminatoruthenate(II1)M. M. Taq u i Kha n *, N. Su m ita R ae a n d S . B. Hal l igud iDiscip l in e o f Coord in a t ion Chem is t ry an d Hom ogen eom Cata l@s , Cat ra l S a l t an dM a r i n e C h e m i c a l s R e s ea r c h I n s t i t u t e , B h a m a g a r 3 64 0 02 c l n d i a )(Received J an ua ry 12, 1990; accept ed J un e 2, 1990)

    Abs t r ac tBut yraldehyde is obtain ed by th e hydroformylation of propylene in aqueous mediumcat alysed by Ru*-saloph -CO comp lex at 27 aim CO + Ha (1:l) syn gas with CSHB:syngas rat io 1:5 an d 120 C with a tu rn over ra te of 17 mol product per mol catalyst perhour.

    Synt hesis of aldeh ydes by th e hydr oformylat ion of ole6ns un der milder conditionshas been of great interest in recent year s [l-5]. The usua l cat alysts involve th e meta lcomp lexes of cobalt su ch as cobalt carbonyl [6, 71 an d ph osphin e-coord ina ted cobaltcarbonyl[8], which act at - 130-160 C an d 100-200 at m CO+H, (1:l). The commercialprepa ra tion of but yraldehyde by th e hydroformylatlon of propylene uses rhodium complexesas catalysts [9, 10 J . The advanta ges [lo] of th e rh odium complex ar e low tem pera tu re(SO-120 C), low pres su re of CO + Ha (7-30 at m) an d th e high er selectivity for th e m orevaluable hydroform ylation product butyr aldehyde.

    There ar e reports in th e literat ur e ln which hydroformylation of propylene tobut yraldehyde was achieved u sing ru th enium complexes as cat alysts at 150 C an d 150a&n CO + H, (1: 1) [ 111. In th e presen t p aper we report t he hydroform ylation of propyleneto but yra ldehyde usin g [Ru(saloph )CO] comp lex at 120 C an d 27 atm CO+Ha (1:l).

    E x p e r i m e n t a l m e t h o d a n d r e s u l t sThe complex [Ru(saloph)CO)] was pr epa red by th e report ed met hod

    [ 121. The hydroform ylat ion of propylene was stu died in aqu eous medium ina 300 ml pr essu re reactor u sing [Ru(saloph)CO] comp lex. The bomb, cont ai-ning C3H6 at 4 at m, was pressu rized by CO + Hz (1:l) to th e desir ed valuewhen th e desired t emperat ur e was at ta ined. The reaction was cont inued for4 h; liquid sam ples were with dra wn from t he rea ctor at specified tim e int ervalsand analysed by GLC (Shimadzu GC - 9A) using a 10% Carbowax column.It was observed th at up t o 4 h only but yraldehyde wa s form ed, after whichmin or a moun ts of isobulyraldehyde began to form . Th e n:i ra tio was foun dto be 10: 1. On cont inu ing th e rea ct ion for a longer conta ct tim e ( > 6 h)th e forma tion of th e corr esponding alcohols of but yra ldehyde an d isobu-

    *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

    0304-5102/90/$3.50 Q Elsevier Sequoia/Printed in The Netherlands

  • 8/3/2019 Hydroformylation of Propylene

    2/4

    2

    tyra ldehyde was also observed. The product but yraldehyde was fur th er confir-med by ta king 13C NMR spectr a of et her extr act of th e reaction mixtu re.The spectr um of th e rea ction mixtu re showed pea ks corr espondin g to n-but yra ldehyde (13C 6 206 ppm for C=O) an d some un reacted pr opylene (13C6 115 and 136 ppm for alkene carbons and 18.7 ppm for CH, protons).The conver sion of propylene to but yra ldehyde a fter a cont act t ime of 4 hwas foun d to be 60%, an d th e tu rn over ra te for but yraldehyde form at ion is17 mol product per mol catalyst per hour. The reaction was also conductedat a tm osph eric pr essur e of CO + Ha (1:l) with C3HG:syn gas ra tio 1:5 an d50 C. The yields of butyraldehyde were reduced to half as compared toth e yields obta ined at 120 C an d 27 at m CO + Ha (1: 1).

    The hydr oformylat ion of pr opylene to but yra ldehyde was also car r iedou t us ing [Ru(EDTA)CO] complex at 120 C an d 27 a tm CO + Ha (1: 1) withC,H,:syn gas ra tio 1:5. It was observed th at along with butyra ldehyde,isobutyraldehyde also formed from the second hour onwards. The yield ofbutyraldehyde was found to be about 15 times less as compared to the[Ru(saloph)CO] complex. The n :i r a t io for [Ru(EDTA)CO] complex was foun dto be 3.0, a nd the overall tu rn over r at e in ter ms of form at ion of both norm alan d isobut yraldehyde was 16 mol products per m ol cat alyst per hour .Discussion

    The mecha nism for t he [Ru(sa loph )CO] complex cat alysed hydr ofor-myla tion of propylene to but yra ldehyde is sh own in Schem e 1.

    In th e proposed mechan ism, in the pr esence of CO + Ha th e Ru(III) Schiffba se complex [LRuUIC1,]- is redu ced to LRu(C0) species 1, which is theactual catalyst in the reaction. Complex 1 reacts with Hz with a heterolyticcleavage of th e lat ter to form th e monohydrido species 2 in a pre-equihbr iumstep. In a second pre-equilibriu m st ep Ka, th e hydr ido complex 2 form s anint erm ediate mixed ligan d olefln complex 3 with a ra te-determ ining tr an sferof H to the olefin to form th e alkyl complex 4. F ast insert ing CO in 4 resu ltsin th e format ion of acyl comp lex 5, which un dergoes hydr ogenolysis in th epr esence of CO in a fast step t o form th e hydr ide 2 a nd the pr oductbut yraldehyde. Tr an sfer of the hydride in step 4 to the P-car bon at om resu ltsin th e forma tion of isobutyra ldehyde. In th e cat alysis by complex 1, Mar-kownikoff s addition of the hydride to the c+carbon atom is however favouredover th e tr an sfer to P-car bon at om; the lat ter however picks up slight ly withthe progress of the reaction. The formation of carbonyl complex 1 is supportedby th e IR spectr um of the complex in solut ion, wh ich shows a peak at 1970cm- an d also a LMCT ban d in th e electr onic s pectr um of th e complex at370 nm [ 13-l 51. The pr oton NMR of th e hydr ide 2 gives a mu ltiplet in th eregion -20.0 to -30.0 ppm . The inser t ion of CO in th e all@ int erm ediat ean d th e hydr ogenolysis of th e acyl int erm ediate ar e th e usua l fast st eps inth e hydr oform ylat ion cat alysed by cobalt an d rh odium complexes [ 16-181.The values of equilibrium constants K1 and Ka and the rate constant kobtained at 120 C are:

  • 8/3/2019 Hydroformylation of Propylene

    3/4

    2LR u C12 + 2C0 + Hz 0 fast- 2LRu (CO) + COz + 2HClI

    LRu n CO + Hz & [LRu (CO)H]- + H*1 2

    CH H (332[ LR u - CO (H )]- + ;H , &% Lk u n ---;H

    AH , A0

    AH ,

    2 3H

    LIAl(332

    -__;H kA A

    LRu -( CH,),CH,H ? A

    3 4

    LRju ( CH2)2CH, fast- LR u -CO-( CH 2),CH 35

    CO + H2LR u -CO-( CH 2)2CH 3 p fast LRu CO( H) + CHO ( CH,),CH 35L = bis(salicylaldehyde)o-phenylenediimineScheme 1.

    Kl = 18.0 M-&=27.0 M-k=8.3 min-The t u r n o v e r r a t e fo r t h e r e a c t i o n i s 1 7 m o l b u t y r a l d e h y d e p e r m o l c a t a l ys tp e r h o u r .

  • 8/3/2019 Hydroformylation of Propylene

    4/4

    4References

    1 M. M. Taqui Khan and A. E. MartelI, Honwg- Catalgsti by Metal Complexes, Vol.II, Academic Press, New York, 1974.2 C. A. Tohnan and J. W. Failer, in L. H. Pignolet (ed.), Homogeneous Cata&sis withMet&-Phmphine Complexes, Plenum Press, New York, 1983, p. 13.3 R. L. Pruett, Adv. Ch-gammetaU chmn., 17 (1973) 1.4 B. Corn& in J. Falbe (ed.), New Syztheti with Carbon Mom&, Springer, New York,1980, p. 1.

    5 F. E. PauIek, Catal. Rev., 6 (1972) 49.6 R. G. Denny, 0x0 Alcohols, Report No. 21, Stanford Research Institute Palo Alto, Nov.1966.7 B. Comils, R. Payer and K. C. Traenckner,Hvdrocarbcm Process., 54 (1975) 83; H. Weber,W. Dimmling and A. M. Desai, Hydrocarbon Process., SS (1976) 127.8 U.S. Pats. 3 239 569 (1966) and 3 239 570 (1966) to L. H. Slaugh and R. D. MUneaux.9 R. L. Pruett and J. A. Smith, J. Org. Chem., 34 (1969) 327.10 R. Fowler, H. Connor and R. A. Baehl, Chemtech, 6 (1976) 772; E. A. V. Brewester, Chem.Eng., 83 (1976) 90.11 R. A. Sanchez-Delgado, J. S. Bradley and G. W-on, J. Chem. Sot., Dalton Iprans.,(1976) 399 and references cited therein.12 L. Marko, in R. Ugo (ed.), Aspects of Homogeneous Catalysis, Vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht,1974.13 A. A. Diamantis and J. V. Dubrawski, wg. Chem., 20 (1981) 1142.14 A. D. Allen and J. R. Stevens, Can. J. Chem., S0 (1972) 3093.15 S. PeIl and J. N. Armor, Zwg. Chem., I2 (1983) 873.16 M. M. Taqui Khan, S. B. HaIIigudi and S. H. R. Abdi, J. Mol. Catal., 48 (1988) 325.17 I. Tkatchenko, in G. Wilkinson, F. G. A. Stone and E. W. Abel (eds.), Cw&prehen.&eOrganometallic Ch.em., Vol. 8, Pergamon, Oxford, 1982.18 C. W. Bird, Chem. Rev., 62 (1962) 283.


Recommended