Hydrogen activities in theArnhem Nijmegen City
Region
Dr. P.A. Veenhuizen
HAN University
Arnhem
Key players in the Arnhem Nijmegen Area
� Nedstack
� Hygear
� Silent Motor Company
� HyET
� Foundation Hydrogen Enterprise Gelderland
� Municipality of Arnhem
� Arnhem-Nijmegen City region
� HAN University
Fuel Cell Technology
Nedstack
� PEM Power plant
� 120 kW peak power
Nedstack & Hytruck
� Fuel cell systeem for citytruck� Net Rated Power: 16 kW
� Build: 2008
� TÜV approved
� Currently integration and field tests running.
Nedstack & Hytruck
Hygear; steamreforming
Silent Motor Company
HyET
� HyET = Hydrogen Efficiency Technologies
� Break-through technology for efficient hydrogen compression and compression energy harvesting to/from 700 Bar cH2
– Compression losses reduced >50% compared to piston compressor
– Hydrogen fuel consumption >15% lower because compression energy is regained
� Working principle is proven (lab-scale) and patented
Foundation Hydrogen Enterprise Gelderland
� Development and usage of an electrical powered auto bus.
� For at least two years three passenger cars and a rally-car, modified by the HAN, will drive on hydrogen.
� Realisation and exploiting an public hydrogen gas station in Arnhem for at least two years.
http://www.coolregion.nl/news/arcivemap/arnhem-on-route-with-hydrogen
� Arnhem Municipality
– “Arnhem Hydrogen city”
� Arnhem Nijmegen City Region
– Hydrogen: no time to waste
HAN University…?
� HAN is University of Applied Sciences in Arnhem and NijmegenAutomotive Lab is located in Arnhem
� 27000 students, bachelor and master
� Automotive department (with history of 65 years) of 800 students
HAN University
� Vehicle mechatronics:
– Electric, hybrid and fuel cell technology
– Alternative fuels
� Mobility technology
– Vehicle dynamics
– HMI
HAN Automotive
Bachelor-
education
Research
groups
Applied Research
Laboratoria
Post
Bachelor
educationCompanies Companies
and civil societyand civil society
Contract
education
Knowledge transfer →
→ knowledge transfer
Students +Students +
Master
education
Hydrogen in internal combustion engine
� Subaru Impreza
� Turbo in Honda
Fork lift truck
Modify electric fork lift truck into fuel cell fork lift truck
Introduction
� Why a fork lift truck?
– Relatively low average power
– Mobile but with a small range (easy fueling)
– Battery operated trucks available
– Partners available (stack supplier, system integrator, truck supplier, end user)
� Why at all?
– Educate young engineers on technologies to come
– Educate ourselves
– Design, realize and test a FC fork lift truck
Lab power demand measurements
Function Peak power
1 Lifting without weight 19.1 kW
2 Lifting of 2000 kg 20.8 kW
3 Acceleration (driving) with 2000 kg 26.4 kW
4 Driving at constant speed 17.5 kW
5 Deceleration with 2000 kg -12.9 kW
6 Acceleration with lifting with 2000 kg 34.8 kW
7 Standby power usage 0.55 kW
0 5 10 15-20
-10
0
10
20
30
time [sec]
Pow
er [
kW]
Field tests by regular operators
0 20 40 60 80 100-20
-10
0
10
20
30
time [minutes]
Pow
er [
kW]
200 250 300 350 400-20
-10
0
10
20
Time [sec]
Pow
er [
kW]
Typical acceleration
Brake energy recuperation
Conclusions from field and lab tests
� Power demand strongly fluctuating
� Braking power can partially be recovered → energy buffer
� Power rating of Fuel Cell stack may be much lower than maximum power demand
Storage Delivery
Traction
Fuel cell stack
Supercap
InverterElektromotor
Production
Air/O2
H2
Power train layout proposal
Component sizing by simulation
kg H2
0.08442
Supercapacitor
P_SCU_SC
Scope 1
PI controlFC + SC parallel
P_EM
U_SC
P_in_FC
P_in_SCFuel Cell
P_in P_FC
Energy [J]
1.198 e+007
Energy Consumption
P_fuel
kg H 2
Energy
Electrical power link
P_in P_out
Duty Cycle 1
P
I
U
E
Detailed loss modeling• Resistive losses in the
supercapacitor modules• Compressor losses• Hydrogen pump losses• Water circulation pump
losses• Cooling fan losses
Battery load profile
http://www.imrt.ethz.ch/research/qss
Simulation results
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Time [sec]
Pow
er [
kW]
Power Demand
Fuel Cell PowerSupercap Power
Simulation results
� Comparing with a system w/o supercap as energy buffer:
– Stack size can be reduced to ~8 kWe
– Fuel consumption is however increased considerably due to higher average stack load
– Stack is loaded at a more constant level; depending on supercap size and energy management strategy
Next steps
� Complete design specifications
– Noise
– Water (vapor) management
– Fueling
– Fail safe/limp home
– Standards and regulations
– Power up/power down procedures
– DC-DC converter technology
– Energy management strategy
� Design, procure, assemble, test, modify, test, …
H2 Laboratory of HAN University
� Component testing
� Research facility
� Energymanagement of fuel cell stacks (Ph-D, TU/e)
Now implemented in Fuel cell luggage tractor on Schiphol
Electric drive train retrofit for Burton
� 2CV platform kit car
� Retrofit into electric vehicle
� 120 kmh top speed, >100 km range
� Safety!
Fuel cell vehicle realization
� Fiat Doblo, pre production vehicle
� Now in system design phase
� Still funding needed for hardware