+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor for

Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor for

Date post: 11-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Acknowledgements Financial support obtained from The Swedish Energy Agency, is gratefully acknowledged. Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor for automotive applications Angélica V. González Arcos and Lars J. Pettersson KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Technology, SE-10044 Stockholm (Sweden) For further Information Please contact Angélica González Tel: +46-87909150 E-mail address: [email protected]. More information on this and related projects can be obtained at: http://researchprojects.kth.se/index.php/kb_ 7863/oe_8042/oe.html What we do? Development of a compact heat integrated fuel reformer to achieve good packing and high efficiency in an Auxiliary power unit system, shown in Fig. 1. Analyze the impact of the addition of biofuels on the reformer performance and catalyst activity e. g. US06, DIN590EN, Fischer-Tropsch fuels and biodiesel such as rapeseed methyl ester (RME). After the fuel reformer additional units are present, like the high and low temperature water gas shift units (HT-WGS and LT-WGS) to increase the hydrogen production and CO clean-up units such as preferential oxidation (PrOX) to avoid poisoning of the fuel cell catalyst. Fig. 1 Hydrogen fuel cell based APU for transport applications APU Fuel processor APU in Truck Using RME for hydrogen production by autothermal reforming is a viable process with a H 2 production of 28-32 %, shown in Fig. 4 . By increasing O 2 /C ratio, formation of CO increases due to the reverse water gas shift reaction at 700-800°C, while the concentration of CO 2 decreases. Regarding temperature profiles similar results can be seen as previous works in our laboratory [3]. Fig. 3 Autothermal reformer 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 H2 CO2 CO N2 Concentration (mol %) Product gas composition RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,25) RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,3) RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,35) RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,4) ATR reactions, steam reforming and partial oxidation of the fuel, are enhance by controlling the oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O 2 /C) and the steam-to-carbon ratio (H 2 O/C) in the reformer. Variation of these operating parameters is used to determine the potential influence of the fuel mixture on the reformate (product gas) quality and the optimal operating conditions. The reforming process in an on-board fuel processor is carried out through an autothermal reforming (ATR) process in structured monolithic catalysts, shown in Fig.2. Fig. 4 Operating parameter study using RME H 2 Fuel Cell Why? Global warming is mainly cause by the greenhouse gas emissions e.g. CO 2 , CO, NO x . It has been reported that 23% of CO 2 emissions came from the transport sector [1]. The 80% of that comes from heavy-duty trucks, which can operate the engine for more than 50% at idle mode. Alternative solution… Replacing the engine idling with a small fuel cell auxiliary power unit (APU) is today considered by the automotive industry as the most viable alternative for idle reduction, as shown in Fig. 1. Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor by a catalytic reforming process is a valid alternative to overcome limitations such as storage and transport [2]. ATR HT-WGS LT-WGS PrOX 1 PrOX 2 Fig. 2 Monolithic substratesr Reforming while using noble metal catalysts e.g. Rh, Ru, Pt, ensure the high conversion, and selectivity of the fuel, e.g. diesel and alternative fuels like RME. Fig. 3 show the fuel reformer Idling is the use of the engine, for non-propulsion purposes, to support the comfort functions in the vehicle, i.e. microwave, air conditioning, lighting, audio equipment. Engine idling is both fuel inefficient as well as a significant contributor of exhaust emissions. Literature cited [1] Greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the transport sector, in International transport Forum 2008. [2] I. Kang, J. Bae, J. Power Sources. 159 (2006), 1283-1290. [3] X. Karatzas, M. Nilsson, J. Dawody, B. Lindström, L.J. Pettersson. Chem. Eng. J. 156 (2010), 366-379. How ?
Transcript

Acknowledgements Financial support obtained from The

Swedish Energy Agency, is gratefully

acknowledged.

Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor for

automotive applications Angélica V. González Arcos and Lars J. Pettersson

KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Technology,

SE-10044 Stockholm (Sweden)

For further Information Please contact Angélica González

Tel: +46-87909150

E-mail address: [email protected].

More information on this and related

projects can be obtained at:

http://researchprojects.kth.se/index.php/kb_

7863/oe_8042/oe.html

What we do? Development of a compact heat integrated fuel reformer to achieve good packing and high efficiency in an

Auxiliary power unit system, shown in Fig. 1. Analyze the impact of the addition of biofuels on the reformer

performance and catalyst activity e. g. US06, DIN590EN, Fischer-Tropsch fuels and biodiesel such as rapeseed

methyl ester (RME).

After the fuel reformer additional units are present, like the high and

low temperature water gas shift units (HT-WGS and LT-WGS) to

increase the hydrogen production and CO clean-up units such as

preferential oxidation (PrOX) to avoid poisoning of the fuel cell

catalyst.

Fig. 1 Hydrogen fuel cell based APU for transport applications

APU

Fuel processor APU in Truck

Using RME for hydrogen production by autothermal reforming is a

viable process with a H2 production of 28-32 %, shown in Fig. 4 .

By increasing O2/C ratio, formation of CO increases due to the reverse water gas shift reaction at 700-800°C, while the

concentration of CO2 decreases.

Regarding temperature profiles similar results can be seen as

previous works in our laboratory [3].

Fig. 3 Autothermal reformer

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

H2 CO2 CO N2

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

mo

l %)

Product gas composition

RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,25)

RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,3)

RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,35)

RME (H2O/C=2,5, O2/C=0,4)

ATR reactions, steam reforming and partial oxidation of the fuel, are

enhance by controlling the oxygen-to-carbon ratio (O2/C) and the

steam-to-carbon ratio (H2O/C) in the reformer.

Variation of these operating parameters is used to determine the

potential influence of the fuel mixture on the reformate (product

gas) quality and the optimal operating conditions.

The reforming process in an on-board fuel

processor is carried out through an autothermal

reforming (ATR) process in structured monolithic

catalysts, shown in Fig.2.

Fig. 4 Operating parameter study using RME

H2 Fuel Cell

Why? Global warming is mainly cause by the greenhouse

gas emissions e.g. CO2, CO, NOx. It has been

reported that 23% of CO2 emissions came from the

transport sector [1]. The 80% of that comes from

heavy-duty trucks, which can operate the engine

for more than 50% at idle mode.

Alternative solution… Replacing the engine idling with a small fuel cell auxiliary

power unit (APU) is today considered by the automotive

industry as the most viable alternative for idle reduction, as

shown in Fig. 1.

Hydrogen produced in an on-board fuel processor by a

catalytic reforming process is a valid alternative to

overcome limitations such as storage and transport [2].

ATR

HT-WGS

LT-WGS

PrOX 1

PrOX 2

Fig. 2 Monolithic substratesr

Reforming while using noble metal catalysts e.g.

Rh, Ru, Pt, ensure the high conversion, and

selectivity of the fuel, e.g. diesel and alternative

fuels like RME. Fig. 3 show the fuel reformer

Idling is the use of the engine, for non-propulsion

purposes, to support the comfort functions in the

vehicle, i.e. microwave, air conditioning, lighting,

audio equipment.

Engine idling is both fuel inefficient as well as a significant

contributor of exhaust emissions.

Literature cited

[1] Greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the transport sector,

in International transport Forum 2008.

[2] I. Kang, J. Bae, J. Power Sources. 159 (2006), 1283-1290.

[3] X. Karatzas, M. Nilsson, J. Dawody, B. Lindström, L.J.

Pettersson. Chem. Eng. J. 156 (2010), 366-379.

How ?

Recommended