+ All Categories
Home > Science > Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Date post: 20-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: tballard56
View: 801 times
Download: 6 times
Share this document with a friend
131
The Hydrogeology of Tennessee Thomas E. Ballard, PG, CHG Taber Consultants Murfreesboro, TN
Transcript
Page 1: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

The Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Thomas E. Ballard, PG, CHGTaber ConsultantsMurfreesboro, TN

Page 2: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

BASIC HYDROGEOLOGY

Page 3: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Hydrologic Cycle

Page 4: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Groundwater Recharge

� Recharge is the processes involved in the addition of water to the saturated zone

� Naturally by precipitation or runoff

� Artificially by spreading or injection

Page 5: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Groundwater Recharge and Discharge

Page 6: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Average Annual Precipitation 1951-80

Page 7: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Types of Aquifers

� Unconsolidated� Sedimentary Bedrock� Limestone/Karst� Fractured Rock

Page 8: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Confined vs. Unconfined Aquifers

Unconfined Aquifer Confined Aquifer

Page 9: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Properties of Aquifers

� Porosity� Effective Porosity� Hydraulic

Conductivity� Specific Yield� Specific Retention� Transmissivity� Storativity

Page 10: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Porosity

The ratio of void space to the total volume of a soil or rock.

Page 11: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Examples of Porosity

Page 12: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Effective Porosity

The percent of the total volume of a given mass of soil or rock that consists of interconnected spaces. Essentially equivalent to permeability.

Page 13: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Primary vs. Secondary Porosity

The porosity that represents the original pore openings when a rock or sediment formed

The porosity developed in a rock after its deposition as result of fracturing or solution; usually not uniformly distributed.

EXAMPLE: Karstic Limestone has relatively low primary porosity, but can have high secondary porosity due to development of solution cavities and channels.

Primary Porosity Secondary Porosity

Page 14: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

The volume of water at the existing kinematic viscosity that will move in a

porous medium in unit time under a unit hydraulic gradient measured at right angles

to the direction of flow. Generally designated as ‘K’ in most groundwater

equations.

Hydraulic Conductivity

Page 15: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Hydraulic Conductivity Illustration

Page 16: Hydrogeology of Tennessee
Page 17: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Specific Yield/Specific Retention

That part of the water in storage in the ground that will drain under the influence of gravity.

That part of water in storage in the ground that is retained as a film on rock surfaces or in very small openings.

Specific Yield Specific Retention

Page 18: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Specific Yield/Specific Retention

Page 19: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Head

ht = z + hp

ht = total headZ = elevation headhp = pressure head

As a practical matter, head is really just the elevation (above sea level) of the standing water level in a well.

Page 20: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Head and Gradient

Page 21: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Groundwater Gradient

Page 22: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

� Darcy’s Law� Groundwater Flow Rate (Velocity)� Transmissivity� Storativity

Principles of Groundwater Flow

Page 23: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Darcy’s Law

Groundwater Flow Rate

𝑽 = 𝑲𝒅𝒉𝒅𝒍

V = flow

K = hydraulic conductivity

dh = head difference

dl = distance between points

Groundwater Flow Volume

𝑸 = 𝑨𝑲𝒅𝒉𝒅𝒍

Q = discharge

A = aquifer cross-section area

K = hydraulic conductivity

dh = head difference

dl = distance between points

Page 24: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

𝑽𝒙 =𝑸𝒏𝒆𝑨

= −𝑲𝒅𝒉𝒏𝒆𝒅𝒍

Where:

Vx = the average linear (seepage) velocityne = the effective porosityQ = the discharge (flux)A = the cross-sectional area of flowK = the hydraulic conductivitydh = difference in groundwater elevation between two measurement pointsdl = distance between the two measurement points used for dh

Groundwater Velocity

Page 25: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Transmissivity

The capacity of an aquifer to transmit water at the prevailing kinematic velocity.

T = KbT = transmissivityK = hydraulic conductivityb = aquifer thickness

Page 26: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Volume of water that a permeable unit releases from or takes into storage per unit surface area per unit change in head.Unconfined aquifer: storativity is virtually equal to specific yield.Confined aquifer: water is derived from expansion of water and compression of the aquifer – specific storage.

Storativity

Page 27: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Calculating Storativity

S = Vw A dh

Vw = volume of waterA = surface area of aquiferdh = change in head

Ranges from 0.01 to 0.30

S = b Ss

b = aquifer thicknessSs = specific storage

Ranges from 0.001 to 0.00001

Confined StorativityUnconfined Storativity

Page 28: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Relative Storage Capacity vs. Depth

� Alluvium generally has highest storage capacity

� Related to sand and gravel content

� Bedrock storage capacity in TN is highly dependent on fractures

� Fewer fractures with depth

Page 29: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Karst Hydrogeology� Two thirds of Tennessee is underlain by

limestone.� Karst is an important groundwater source

in those areas.� Primary porosity is low in limestone.� Secondary porosity i.e. solution cavities

and fractures are an important groundwater source.

� Karst aquifers best developed near surface and in relatively pure limestones.

Page 30: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Karst Aquifers

� Openings forming the karst aquifer may be partly or completely water-filled.

� The elevation where all pores are filled with water in an aquifer is the water table.

� Water tables in karst areas can be highly irregular in elevation, because water-carrying conduits can develop at various elevations.

Page 31: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Idealized Diagram of Karst Development

Page 32: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Distribution of Limestonein Tennessee

Page 33: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Karst Regions of Tennessee

Page 34: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Page 35: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Regional G

eology

Page 36: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Generalized Geology Key

Page 37: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Regional Structural Setting

Page 38: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Tennessee Aquifer Systems

Page 39: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

TENNESSEE HYDROGEOLOGYOVERVIEW

Page 40: Hydrogeology of Tennessee
Page 41: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

PRINCIPAL AQUIFERS IN TENNESSEERate of water withdrawal by public water systems in millions of gallons per day, 2000Source: U. S. Geological Survey

0.48 Mgal/d3.74 Mgal/d244 Mgal/d

10.9 Mgal/d

Cretaceous sand aquifer

Ordovician carbonate aquifer

Pennsylvanian sandstone aquiferTertiary sand

aquifer

36°

89°88° 87° 86° 85° 84° 83° 82°

Modified from Bradley andHollyday, 1985

35°

2.27 Mgal/d2.27 Mgal/d

4.09 Mgal/d

17.1 Mgal/d

Alluvial aquifer

Alluvial aquiferCambrian-Ordovician carbonate aquifer

Mississippian carbonate aquifer

Crystalline rock aquifer

41.2 Mgal/d

Page 42: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

TENNESSEE WATER SUPPLY SOURCESSource of water supply, in percent, for public water supply withdrawals in Tennessee, 2000Source: U. S. Geological Survey

Page 43: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

PRINCIPAL TN PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS THAT WITHDREW GROUNDWATER IN 2000

88°

36°

89°

87° 86° 85° 84° 83° 82°

35°Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1972,

No withdrawals

Ground-water withdrawals(million gallons per day)

Less than 1

1 to 10

Greater than 10 to 20

More than 150

EXPLANATION

Public water-supply system using more than 0.02 million gallons per day ground water from wells. Number is system identifier

Public water-supply system using more than 0.02 million gallons per day ground water from springs or from both wells and springs

Public water-supply system using less than 0.02 million gallons per day ground water

Page 44: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS FROM PRINCIPAL AQUIFERS, 2000Source: U. S. Geological Survey

Page 45: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

TRENDS IN PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WITHDRAWALS, 1950-2000Source: U. S. Geological Survey

Page 46: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

TOP 10 COUNTIES FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WITHDRAWALS, 2010Source: U. S. Geological Survey

County Population Served Withdrawals (Mgd)

Shelby 924,861 173.07

Madison 86,464 13.23

Hamilton 333,606 10.7

Carter 44,302 7.46

Tipton 59,109 6.5

Obion 31,636 5.34

Gibson 39,774 5.25

Dyer 36,890 5.17

Jefferson 38,758 4.58

Montgomery 169,404 3.58

Page 47: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

TOP 10 COUNTIES FOR DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY WITHDRAWALS, 2010Source: U. S. Geological Survey

County Population on Well Water Withdrawals (Mgd)

Rutherford 34,507 2.48

Sevier 31,317 2.25

Fayette 22,675 1.63

Robertson 20.752 1.49

Hawkins 17,885 1.29

Grainger 15,294 1.10

Blount 14,284 1.03

Carter 13,122 0.94

McMinn 13,104 0.94

Jefferson 12,649 0.91

Page 48: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

WELL DRILLING TRENDS IN TENNESSEESource: Tennessee Department of Environmental and Conservation, Division of Water Resources

Year Number of Wells Drilled (approx)

2007 5000

2010 2400

2015 2150

Page 49: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

REGIONAL AQUIFER SYSTEMS

Page 50: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Mississippi Embayment Aquifer System

Page 51: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Mississippi Embayment Aquifer System

Page 52: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Mississippi Embayment Cross Section

Page 53: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Memphis Aquifers

Page 54: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Mississippi Embayment Stratigraphy

Page 55: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 56: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 57: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Upper Claiborne

Page 58: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Middle Claiborne (Memphis Sand)

Page 59: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Lower Claiborne – Upper Wilcox

Page 60: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Middle Wilcox (Fort Pillow Sand)

Page 61: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Lower Wilcox

Page 62: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Top of Lower Wilcox Aquifer

Page 63: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

McNairy-Nacatoch Aquifer

Page 64: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Pre-Pumping Groundwater Flow in the Lower Wilcox Aquifer

Page 65: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Water QualityMcNairy-Nacatoch Aquifer

Page 66: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics

� Cretaceous to Quaternary unconsolidated sediments.

� Extremely productive multiple sand aquifers separated by local and regional confining beds.

� Aquifers thicken from east to west where they occur in Tennessee.

� Greatest yields come from the Memphis Sand (Middle and Lower Claiborne) –generally 200 to 1,000 gpm but over 2,000 gpm locally.

Page 67: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Central Basin Aquifer System

Page 68: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Central Basin Aquifer System

Page 69: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Generalized Cross Section

Page 70: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Central Basin Statigraphy

Page 71: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 72: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 73: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 74: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Detailed Stratigraphy

Page 75: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual GroundwaterFlow Model

Page 76: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater ModelInner Central Basin

Page 77: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater Model Outer Central Basin

Page 78: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Central Basin Well Yields

Page 79: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Central Basin Water Quality

Page 80: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics� Carbonate rocks

(limestone and some dolomite) are primary aquifers.

� Intervening confining units of shale and shalylimestones

� Chattanooga Shale separates Central Basin Aquifer System from overlying Mississippian rocks of the Highland Rim

� Depth of freshwater varies greatly.

� Wells are typically 50 –200 feet deep.

� Depth to salt water is generally greatest where the limestone and dolomite aquifers crop out i.e. the apex of the Nashville Dome.

� Recharge rates affect depth to salt water.

Page 81: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Highland Rim Aquifer System

Page 82: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Highland Rim Aquifer System

Page 83: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Generalized Cross Section

Page 84: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Highland R

im Stratigraphy

Page 85: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Highland R

im D

etailed Stratigraphy

Page 86: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater ModelEastern Highland Rim

Page 87: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Highland Rim Water Quality

Page 88: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics

Most Productive Mississippian Aquifers

� Ste. Genevieve Limestone

� St. Louis Limestone� Warsaw Limestone� Fort Payne Formation

Fine-grained clastic rocks are not generally productive

� Mostly karst aquifers� Groundwater moves

through fractures, bedding planes, and solution openings in the limestone

� Hydraulic characteristics (yield and specific capacity) vary greatly over short distances

Page 89: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Knox Aquifer

Page 90: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Knox Aquifer

Page 91: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cross Section of the Knox Aquifer

Page 92: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Knox Aquifer Stratigraphy

Page 93: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Model of Groundwater Flow in the Knox Aquifer

Page 94: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Water Quality of the Upper Knox Aquifer

Page 95: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics� Regional aquifer.� Distinct from Knox

Formation units in Valley and Ridge.

� Only exposed in Sequatchie Valley.

� Recharge through fractures that transect the overlying confining unit.

� Water yields in upper 50 feet.

� Dolomite typically has the best yield

� Limestones yield little water

� TDS < 1,000 mg/l at center of Nashville Dome and Sequatchie Valley anticline

� Deeper zones have high TDS

� Freshwater-saltwater interface does not coincide with shallower aquifers

Page 96: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cumberland Plateau Aquifer System

Page 97: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cumberland Plateau Aquifer System

Page 98: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Generalized Cross SectionNorthern Cumberland Plateau

Page 99: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cross Sections - Mid and Southern Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee

Wilson, C.W., Jr. and Stearns, R.G., 1958, Structure of the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee, State of Tennessee, Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Geology, Report of Investigations No. 8

Page 100: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cum

berland Plateau Stratigraphy

Page 101: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Groundwater Movement Model

Aquifers in consolidated rocks are directly recharged by precipitation where they are exposed at the land surface. Water enters the aquifers primarily through fractures. Fractures decrease in width and number with depth. In Pennsylvanian rocks, underclay beneath coal beds creates perched water tables, which result in springs that issue from valley walls. Water percolates slowly downward through the underclay to reach the main water table.

Page 102: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater ModelCumberland Plateau

Groundwater moves primarily through fractures in clastic rocks and solution openings in limestone. Fractures in shale confining units allow rapid downward movement. Shallow near-surface fractures yield the most water to wells.

Page 103: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Cross Section and RechargeCumberland Plateau

Page 104: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

General Water QualityCumberland Plateau

Page 105: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics� Geology consists of

easterly dipping Pennsylvanian and Mississippian rocks.

� Pennsylvanian rocks are primarily sandstone, conglomerate and shale with some coal beds.

� Mississippian rocks are primarily shale and limestones.

� Locally, excessive concentrations of iron or sulfate may be present.

� A complete, ideal cycle of Pennsylvania rocks consists of, from bottom to top: underclay, coal, gray shale or black platy shale, freshwater limestone, and sandstone or silty shale.

� Water from limestones tends to be alkaline and from coal/black shale more acidic.

� Deeper water tends to be more mineralized.

Page 106: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge Aquifer System

Page 107: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge Aquifer System

Page 108: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge ProvinceGeneralized Cross Section

Page 109: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge ProvinceConceptual Cross Section

Page 110: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Principal Aquifers in Valley and Ridge

� Principal aquifers are carbonate rocks of Cambrian and Ordovician Age

Page 111: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge Stratigraphy

Page 112: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge Stratigraphy

Page 113: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Valley and Ridge ProvinceConceptual Groundwater Model

Groundwater moves downward through interstitial pore spaces in residuum and alluvium into the consolidated rocks, where it moves along fractures, bedding planes and solution openings. The general direction of flow is from ridges to toward springs and streams in the valleys.

Page 114: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater ModelValley and Ridge

Page 115: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Groundwater ModelWestern Toe

Page 116: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Water Quality –Valley and Ridge

Page 117: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics� Geology is defined by

series of imbricate faulting related to deep detachment fault system.

� Groundwater is primary stored in fractures, bedding planes and solution openings.

� Nature of the geology dictates no regional flow systems.

� Karst systems generally have the best yields.

� Fractures in clastic rocks can yield water locally.

� Some production from alluvium and residuum.

� Groundwater type is typically calcium-magnesium-bicarbonate.

Page 118: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Blue Ridge Aquifers

Page 119: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Blue Ridge Aquifer System

Page 120: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Generalized Geologic Cross Section of East Tennessee

Page 121: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Blue Ridge Stratigraphy

Page 122: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Blue Ridge ProvinceConceptual Groundwater Model

Page 123: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Water Quality – Blue Ridge

Page 124: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics

� Most available groundwater is in fractures within a few hundred feet of the ground surface.

� Production capacity defined by number, size and degree of interconnected fractures.

� Fractures close off at depth.

� Regional groundwater flow is not significant

� Groundwater quality is generally good with low TDS.

� Groundwater is calcium-magnesium-bicarbonate type.

Page 125: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Basal Sandstone Aquifer

Page 126: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Basal Sandstone Aquifer System

Page 127: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Basal Sandstone Distribution

Page 128: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Basal Sandstone Stratigraphy

Page 129: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Conceptual Model of Basal Sandstone Groundwater Occurrence

Page 130: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Aquifer Characteristics

� No surface exposures

� Occurs at depths of 5,000 to 10,000 feet

� 200 to 400 feet thick� Similar to other basal

units throughout the world

� Limited data� TDS exceeds 10,000

mg/l� Not drinking water

quality� Has been used for

deep injection wells

Page 131: Hydrogeology of Tennessee

Questions?


Recommended