Page 1 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Hydropower Guidance Note HGN 2 Hydropower Flow standards
This Guidance will come into effect 12 weeks after its publication and will then form the basis for our determination of permit applications for new hydropower schemes, which we receive and accept as valid from the 1 April 2014.
This guidance is not intended as a statement of law and should be read in
combination with and in the context of the relevant enactments and EU obligations.
Nothing in this guidance is intended to give NRW power to do anything that it would
not otherwise have power to do or exercise any of its functions in a manner contrary
to the provisions of any enactment or any EU obligation. In the event of any conflict
between this guidance and enactments or EU obligations the latter takes
precedence.
This Guidance Note has been prepared by NRW to provide applicants for
impoundment and abstraction licences for the purpose of hydropower with
information in relation to the mitigation standards for hydropower. Its contents may
be updated periodically and applicants should ensure they read the most recent
version, which is available on the NRW website.
1. Purpose of this guidance note
This guidance note will allow applicants to assess a proposed scheme and
understand the type of operational condition that may be included in any licence
issued by Natural Resources Wales.
The standards described here are intended as guidance only. Conclusions reached
by using the flow chart and decision checklists in this guidance note are not binding,
but designed to allow applicants a simple means of assessing their scheme.
Applications are assessed taking account of site specific factors and circumstances;
for this reason licences may vary from the standards described in the flow charts and
decision checklists.
Page 2 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Applicants should read the other Natural Resource Wales hydropower guidance
notes to help them understand the legal, scientific and regulatory context for the
standards described here.
2. Overview of approach
This guidance describes the process that applicants should follow to determine how
much water is likely to be licensed for abstraction for hydroelectric power
generation, and how that abstraction should be managed to reduce the risk of impact
to in-stream and riparian ecology.
It has been developed so that a hydropower developer may determine initial
mitigation requirements with a limited amount of site information. The checklists
included in this section should be used first to assess whether a scheme is likely to
be considered acceptable and if it is, to determine the indicative flow mitigation
requirements.
Additional guidance is provided to describe how some site characteristics will allow
alternative mitigation standards to be applied.
3. Abstraction standards for hydropower
Our strategies for licensing consumptive abstractions at a catchment scale are set
out in our Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies (CAMS). The normal flow
standards to which cumulative, consumptive abstractions are licensed by Natural
Resources Wales in the CAMS are the Environmental Flow Indicators (EFIs).
Most abstractions for hydropower schemes are non-consumptive and result in a
length of river reach in which flow is depleted, returning flow to the same
watercourse at a downstream discharge point. For such non-consumptive
abstractions, flow mitigation requirements that differ from the Environmental Flow
Indicators can be applied provided that they are sufficient to protect the ecology of
both the depleted reach and the wider river catchment.
Our approach to setting mitigation standards for hydropower abstractions where
there is a depleted reach is based on two key principles of managing flows and river
ecosystems. These are:
i. protecting the ecology of depleted reaches by seeking to replicate the
characteristics of the natural flow regime;
Page 3 of 25
www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
ii. managing the spatial impact of individual schemes on the wider river
ecosystem according to the size and gradient of the stream and the
location of that stream within a river catchment.
Where a proposed hydropower scheme risks adversely affecting flow sensitive
features of designated conservation sites Natura 2000 sites (SAC’s, SPA’s),
Ramsar or Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), or the supporting habitat of
features of such sites, more stringent standards of mitigation will usually be required.
Some hydropower developments can disrupt the connectivity of river ecosystems by
introducing hydrological barriers (flow depleted reaches) and/or physical barriers
(impounding weirs). It is important that connectivity is maintained within a river
ecosystem for free passage of species, nutrients and sediment along its course.
As a general rule hydropower developments in lower catchment streams and rivers
present a higher risk of disrupting ecosystem connectivity and of having a greater
spatial impact than schemes that are located in smaller, headwater tributaries.
The need to maintain ecosystem connectivity is particularly important for the
protection of migratory salmonids that require access along lower catchment rivers to
reach spawning and nursery tributaries where they are present in upper reaches of
catchments.
We reduce the risk of disrupting connectivity by setting appropriate flow mitigation
standards and including measures to preserve fish passage.
4. Setting environmental flows
Abstraction regimes for hydropower that create a depleted reach will normally be
required to protect three key characteristics of natural flow regimes to reduce the risk
of impact on in-stream ecology. These are:
i. Protecting low flows
Setting a flow rate below which abstraction cannot occur is often described as a
Hands off Flow (HoF). It ensures that low river flows will always be protected from
abstraction. All hydropower abstraction licences will have a HoF.
Page 4 of 25
www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
ii. Protecting flow variability
An abstraction will normally be required to allow a proportion of the available flow to
pass downstream of the intake at all times to mimic the river’s natural flow variability
within the depleted reach. The available flow is that available for abstraction between
the HoF and the maximum abstraction rate. The proportion abstracted is termed the
‘percentage take (% take)’.
iii. Protecting high flows
A maximum rate of abstraction above which no additional flow may be abstracted will be set. This rate is typically expressed as a proportion of the mean flow (Qmean). Having a maximum abstraction rate ensures that high flow rates necessary for in-channel geomorphological processes occur within the depleted reach. 5. How to use our guidance to determine an abstraction regime for
hydropower We have a two tier approach to determining the mitigation standards that will be required for a hydropower abstraction. A flow chart summarising the approach is provided in Figure 1 below.
Page 5 of 25
Scheme for licensing non consumptive abstractions (including hydropower)
No depleted reach On-weir schemes
Schemes creating a depleted reach
Zone 1
Designated sites, supporting habitats and
protected species.
Zone 2
Depleted reach gradient <10%
Lower catchment rivers and streams
Zone 3
Depleted reach gradient >10%
Upper catchment streams
Abstraction of up to 100% of available flow above
Hands off Flow
70% take Max abs = Qmean
Low flow protection = minimum of Q95
Tie
r 1
Ind
icati
ve M
itig
ati
on
Sta
nd
ard
s
Tie
r 2
Sit
e s
pe
cif
ic
mit
igati
on
50% take Max abs = 1.3 x Qmean
Low flow protection = minimum of Q95
10 to 40% take* Max abs = 1.3 x Qmean
Low flow protection = minimum of Q95
Environmental survey and impact assessment. Also see guidance on zone movement for site characteristics and gradient
Zone 1
Mitigation standards
Zone 2
Mitigation standards
Zone 3
Mitigation standards
Figure 1: Flow chart for identifying indicative abstraction rates for hydropower schemes in Wales * deviation above 40% can occur if developer provides evidence to conclude no adverse impact to the SAC feature
Page 6 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
The tiers are:
Tier 1 Indicative mitigation:
Where a proposed hydropower scheme is ‘on-weir’ then the indicative mitigation
requirements for schemes with no depleted reach should be applied.
Where a scheme will result in a depleted reach simple site characteristics are used to
classify its location into one of three management zones to determine indicative mitigation
requirements.
These zones are:
Zone 1: Designated Sites and supporting habitat of features of designated sites,
protected species and river dependent species (See note 1 below)
Zone 2: Lower catchment streams & rivers: sites where the average channel
gradient of the depleted reach is less than 10% slope (<10%)
Zone 3 – Upper catchment streams: sites where the average channel gradient of
the depleted reach is greater than 10% slope (>10%)
Average bedslope gradient of the depleted reach is used as a simple measure to
collectively describe hydrological regime, location in the drainage network and channel
geomorphology. A bed gradient of 10% and greater within the depleted reach is indicative
of steeper, upland streams that are responsive to rainfall.
Tier 2 Site specific mitigation:
Particular physical or ecological characteristics of a proposed scheme and its depleted
reach can sometimes demonstrate that alternative flow mitigation can be applied.
Developers will need to provide appropriately detailed evidence to support alternative flow
mitigation. More guidance on where alternative flow mitigation may be possible is provided
in later sections of this note.
6. Selecting a management zone
The use of a two tiered approach will enable an applicant to independently identify an
indicative abstraction regime from limited information about the site at an early stage in the
development process. This may be prior to, or form part of the pre-application process. In
addition to a description of the scheme layout that contains locations of proposed points of
Page 7 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
abstraction and discharge, the information listed below will usually be necessary to
determine the management zone in which a proposed site with depleted reach is located:
Basic hydrological data including flow duration statistics;
Topographic data to include gradient and length of the depleted reach;
Catchment size at the point of abstraction;
Whether the proposed scheme is located within a designated site, or within the
hydrological catchment of a designated site and is likely to affect any of the notified
features of such sites because of the presence of supporting habitat, or the sensitivity
of the features to the flow or hydrological regime of that site;
Whether the proposed scheme is likely to affect any protected species, and if so
whether they are flow sensitive species, and the likely extent of those impacts;
Applicant checklists
The checklists below are designed to help applicants assess the likely outcome of their
application to develop a hydropower scheme in Wales and identify indicative flow
mitigation standards. Applicants should begin at the top of checklist A and use the lists in
combination with the Guidance Notes referred to in the notes associated with each
checklist.
The checklist conclusions are indicative only and may not always correspond with the final
licence determination of NRW. Applications will be individually assessed and determined
by NRW.
Page 8 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Yes No
1 Is the scheme sited: (see Note 1)
(a) within a designated site or within the
hydrological catchment of a designated site?
(b) within Supporting Habitat for features of a
designated site?
(c) in a reach that supports a flow sensitive
protected species?
2
Will the scheme incorporate a depleted reach
beyond the immediate vicinity of the impounding
weir?
Go to Checklist C Go to 3
3
Will the scheme use an existing impounding weir
that cannot be removed because it has a licensed
or essential use? (see Note 2)
Go to 5 Go to 4
4
Will the scheme involve building a new impounding
weir OR improving/using an existing weir that
might be removed in the future? (see Note 3)
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
Go to 5
5
If fish are present, will the scheme maintain or
improve upstream and downstream fish and eel
passage past the weir? (see Note 4)
Go to 6
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
6
Will the scheme maintain the amenity value and
ecology of the weir and wier pool where
appropriate? (see Note 5)
Go to 7
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
7
Will the scheme affect other licensed and
established uses of the site (e.g. water abstraction,
fisheries)? (see note 6)
Any conflicts
should be
resolved before
considering an
applicaton
Go to 8
8
In principle we are prepared to consider a formal
application for the necessary licence(s). The
abstraction rate may be up to 100% above the
Hands Off Flow required to protect fish passage,
weir pool ecology, amenity, and licensed and
established uses. (see Note 7)
Checklist A: All schemes
If yes to any, go to
Checklist BIf no to all, go to 2
Page 9 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Notes for Checklist A
Note 1: For the purpose of this guidance:
Designated Sites include: Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protected
Areas (SPAs), Ramsar wetland sites and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
Designated sites in Wales include some rivers and water dependent wetland habitats.
Supporting Habitats are defined as habitats that support the notified features of
designated sites for all or part of their life cycle. This could include tributaries of
designated river sites.
Protected species are species that receive special legal protection under the
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) and Schedules 5
& 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Some protected species are
sensitive to river flow or the construction of hydropower schemes
River dependent features are those terrestrial features which depend on rivers (e.g.
Oceanic Woodlands near streams).
See Guidance Note: Designated Sites
Note 2: Removing weirs that interfere with the movement of fish or sediment is a priority
for river ecosystem restoration in Wales. If a weir could otherwise be removed, hydropower
development will compromise restoration efforts and will normally be inappropriate. The
criteria for a weir being removable are technical; current ownership restrictions or financial
constraints may change in the future. Weirs that are listed heritage features or have
licensed or essential uses (e.g. active water abstraction, protecting essential
support/protection to infrastructure) are unlikely to be removable now or in the foreseeable
future. Such weirs are thus preferred sites for hydropower development. For further
information see the following guidance note: Weirs
Note 3: Weirs can affect river ecosystems by interfering with the movement of fish and
sediment and altering channel morphology. Building new weirs and restoring weirs that
could otherwise be removed could compromise river ecosystem restoration efforts; where
this potential exists full account will be taken of it in determining an application. For further
information see the following guidance notes: Weirs, Fish Passage, Geomorphology, and
Water Framework Directive.
Note 4: If the weir is currently impassable to fish, we will, where technically feasible and
financially proportionate, seek the inclusion of measures to allow fish passage. If the weir
is currently passable to fish, we will seek measures to maintain or improve fish passage.
For passable weirs where eel, salmon or sea trout are present, passage efficiency will
Page 10 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
most often need to be maintained or improved. For further information see the following
guidance notes: Fish Passage and Fish Screening.
Note 5: In some cases (e.g. heavily impounded lowland rivers), weir pools can provide
rare/important habitats for fish and wildlife. In such cases we will seek the inclusion of
measures in hydropower developments to maintain and/or enhance these features. See
Guidance Note: Weir Pools.
Note 6: Before you consider submitting an application, talk with people who may be
affected by your proposal, listen to what they have to say and take steps to address their
concerns.
Note 7: The specific mitigation requirement will be determined based on site specific
conditions, the Water Framework Directive status of the water body and adjacent/affected
water bodies, and other uses of the site.
Page 11 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Yes No
1
Is the scheme likely to affect the notified
features of a designated site or habitat that
supports such features? (See Note 1 and 2)
Go to 2 Go to 3
2
Can it be demonstrated that the scheme will
not affect the conservation objectives of the
designated site(s) concerned? (See Note 3)
Go to 3The scheme will
not be licensed
3
Is the scheme likely to affect a protected
species? (see section 'Zone 1' in this
document)
Go to 4 Go to 5
4Is the protected species flow sensitive? (see
section 'Zone 1' in this document)Go to 5
Go to Checklist A,
question 2
5
In principle we are prepared to consider a
formal application for the necessary
licence(s).The indicative Zone 1 mitigation for
a scheme with depleted reach is minimum low
flow protection of Q95 , 10% to 40%
abstraction of available flow and maximum
abstraction of 1.3 x Qmean. (see Note 4)
Checklist B: Schemes affecting the notified features of designated sites and the
supporting habitats of such features or protected species (see Note 1).
Page 12 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Notes for Checklist B
Note 1: Designated river sites, their supporting habitat, river dependent features, and
protected species receive higher levels of protection under European and UK legislation.
The conditions and mitigation measures for hydropower development in these sites are
thus more precautionary, and more detailed evidence is typically needed to allow
assessment of risk. The applicant assumes the burden of demonstrating ‘no harm’. See
Note 1 of Checklist A and Guidance Note: Designated Sites.
Note 2: Supporting habitats are those tributaries or parts there of which contribute to site
integrity. For species, this could include areas of salmon spawning and / or nursery habitat.
For habitats, these are areas of habitat or that are important to the maintenance or
recovery of downstream habitat, for example sediment sources.
Note 3: Hydropower development in SAC rivers will rarely be appropriate and any
application should be carefully considered. In SAC rivers, particularly those for which a
migratory fish species is a designated feature, building new weirs and using removable
weirs should be avoided; any hydropower development should target existing weirs that
cannot be removed. For schemes located in supporting habitats, the construction of new
impounding weirs will only be acceptable if the applicant can clearly demonstrate that the
scheme will not impact on current or future conservation objectives. See Guidance Note:
Designated Sites.
Note 4: These indicative flow mitigation measures can be adjusted based on site specific
considerations contingent on the applicant clearly demonstrating that the scheme will not
unacceptably affect the current conservation objectives of the site/species.
Page 13 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Yes No
1Is the average channel gradient of the proposed depleted
reach < 10%? (see Note 1)Go to 2 Go to 7
2
Will the scheme use an existing impounding weir that
cannot be removed because it has a licensed or
essential use? (see Note 2)
Go to 3 Go to 4
3
If fish are present, will the scheme maintain or improve
upstream and downstream fish and eel passage past the
weir? (see note 3)
Go to 5
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
4
Will the scheme involve building a new impounding weir
on main river OR improving/using an existing weir that
might be removed in the future? (see Note 2 and 7)
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
Go to 5
5
Will the scheme maintain the amenity value and ecology
of the weir and wier pool where appropriate? (see Note 5
in checklist A)
Go to 6
The scheme is
unlikely to be
licensed
6
Will the scheme conflict with other licensed and
established uses of the site (e.g. water abstraction,
fisheries)? (See note 5)
Any conflicts
should be
resolved before
proceeding with
your application
Go to 8
7
In high gradient channels (>10%), whether the scheme
uses an existing impounding weir OR involves building a
new impounding weir, will the scheme be located,
designed and maintained so as to: 1. not interfere with the
movement of fish and sediment, and 2. minimise the
impacts of abstraction on the depleted reach? (see Note
6)
Go to 9
Work with NRW
staff to redesign
the scheme
before
proceeding with
your application
8
In principle we are prepared to consider a formal
application for the necessary licence(s). The indicative
flow mitigation measures for low (<10%) gradient
channels are: Hands off Flow = Q95, 50% take, maximum
abstraction = 1.3 x Qmean. (see Note 6)
9
In principle we are prepared to consider a formal
application for the necessary licence(s). The indicative
flow mitigation measures for high (>10%) gradient
depleted reaches are: Hands off Flow = Q95, 70% take,
maximum abstraction = Qmean. (see Note 6)
Checklist C: Schemes with depleted reaches
Page 14 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Notes for Checklist C
Note 1: Channel gradient is the drop in elevation between two points divided by the stream
length between those two points. A gradient of 10% is equivalent to a 10 metre drop over a
length of 100m. As a guide, on 1:50,000 Ordinance Survey maps, a 10% slope is
associated with a 2mm space between 10m contours as measured along the blue line of
the river channel. Channel gradient may need to be measured in the field.
Note 2: Removing weirs that interfere with the movement of fish or sediment is a priority
for river ecosystem restoration in Wales. If a weir could otherwise be removed, hydropower
development will compromise restoration efforts and will normally be inappropriate. The
criteria for a weir being removable are technical; current ownership restrictions or financial
constraints may change in the future. Weirs that are listed heritage features or have
licensed or essential uses (e.g. active water abstraction, protecting essential
support/protection to infrastructure) are unlikely to be removable now or in the foreseeable
future. Such weirs are thus preferred sites for hydropower development. See Guidance
Note: Weirs, Guidance Note: Geomorphology.
Note 3: If the weir is currently impassable to fish, the scheme should, where technically
feasible and financially proportionate, include measures to allow fish passage. If the weir is
currently passable to fish, the scheme should maintain or improve fish passage. For
passable weirs where eel, salmon or sea trout are present, passage efficiency will most
often need to be maintained or improved. See Guidance Note: Fish Passage and
Guidance Note: Fish Screening.
Note 4: In some cases (e.g. heavily impounded lowland rivers), weir pools can provide
rare/important habitats for fish and wildlife. In such cases, hydropower development should
aim to maintain and/or enhance these features. See Guidance Note: Weir Pools.
Note 5: Resolving conflicts with others who are affected by hydropower development may
facilitate hydropower development by reducing the likelihood of objections and legal
actions.
Note 6: High gradient channels are an example of where the use of otherwise removable
weirs, and the construction of new weirs, may be acceptable. This is because such
channels are often 'naturally fragmented' by falls and steep cascades AND the spatial
impacts of such schemes on catchment scale processes are expected to be spatially
limited. We encourage applicants to locate, design and maintain schemes so as to
Page 15 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
minimise impacts (e.g. locating abstraction point weirs on natural falls and above tributary
confluences). See Guidance Note: Fish Passage, Guidance Note: Weirs and Guidance
Note: Geomorphology.
Note 7: Main rivers are defined in the Water Resources Act and are a statutory type of
watercourse in Wales. Whilst they are usually larger streams and rivers, they can also
include some smaller watercourses. Main rivers can be identified by reference to the
relevant main river map and can include any structure or appliance for controlling or
regulating the flow of water in, into or out of a main river. Watercourses that do not form
part of a ‘main river’ are defined as ‘ordinary watercourses’. The definition of watercourse
is quite broad and can be found in the Water Resources Act and the Land Drainage Act.
Given the potential adverse effects on the environment – and the nature of these effects –
we are unlikely to approve the construction of new weirs on lowland rivers without clear
and specific justification. This will also apply to the reconstruction of weirs that have
ceased to be serviceable and which have been identified as preventing the achievement of
WFD objectives. We are unlikely to be able to grant licences in connection with
applications for such schemes in designated sites and their supporting habitats.
Page 16 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
7. Tier 1 Indicative Mitigation Requirements
7.1 Indicative mitigation standards for schemes with no depleted reaches
Hydropower schemes that are built on an existing weir or natural fall (such as a waterfall or
steep cascade) and discharge turbine flow into the river channel at the toe of the weir or
natural feature may not result in any depletion of flow in the downstream reach of river.
Some schemes, may use a leat to convey flow away from the weir and result in turbine
flow being discharged into the river a distance from the toe of the weir or natural fall.
Where a scheme discharges into a ponded section of river that has a backwater to the toe
of the weir or fall then it may be considered as having no depleted reach and the on-weir
indicative mitigation standards set out below will usually be applied. Where the turbine flow
is discharged downstream and the abstraction will result in a length of river in which there
are reduced flows then the depleted reach mitigation requirements are applicable.
For schemes where there is no depleted reach the following indicative mitigation standards
can be applied:
Table 1. Indicative mitigation for sites with no depleted reach
Low flow protection
(Hands off Flow)
% take of available flow Maximum abstraction rate
Minimum of Q95 Up to100% 1.3 x Qmean
Notes:
The level of low flow protection will be based on site specific requirements to support
local ecology and amenity, such as the visual appearance of flow over the face of a weir
or cascade. The minimum level of mitigation that we usually require is a Q95 flow.
For schemes proposed within sites designated for nature conservation, higher levels of
mitigation may be required if a scheme is considered acceptable.
Q95 is a site specific flow duration statistic that describes a flow rate that is equalled or
exceeded for 95 percent of the time in an average year. It represents a typical low
summer flow.
Page 17 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Available flow is that available for abstraction after flow requirements for amenity, low
flow protection and fish passage have been fully met.
Qmean is the mean annual flow at a site.
7.2 Indicative mitigation standards for schemes with a depleted reach
The mitigation requirements are set to provide the amount of residual flow necessary to
minimise the risk to in-stream ecology for a river type according to its nature conservation
status, its location within a catchment and its catchment characteristics.
Zone 1 - Designated sites, supporting habitat and protected species.
This zone includes sites that are recognised nationally and internationally for their
importance for nature conservation and are afforded a high level of legal environmental
protection. Wales has a number of sites that have been designated as an area protected
for nature conservation. Where the notified features of protected sites are sensitive to
changes in river flow, the mitigation requirements for schemes proposed in these areas are
likely to be more stringent than for schemes that have no designation for nature
conservation.
Designated site features that are sensitive to changes in flow include:
Old sessile oakwoods with Ilex and Blechnum
Western/Atlantic (oceanic) bryophyte assemblages
Killarney fern Trichomanes speciosum
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar
Allis shad Alosa alosa
Twaite shad Alosa fallax
Sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus
River lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis
Brook lamprey Lampetra planeri
Bullhead Cottus gobio
Eel Anguilla anguilla
Freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera
White-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes
Otter Lutra lutra
Water vole Arvicola terrestris
Page 18 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Detailed maps of designated sites in Wales are currently available at
http://www.naturalresources.wales
Applicants should refer to these maps to confirm whether their scheme is located within, or
will affect flows or hydrological regimes within the boundaries of a designated site.
Information about the notified features of Natura 2000 sites (Special Areas of Conservation
and Special Protection Areas) and Ramsar sites can be found on the JNCC website
Applicants are also advised to refer to information about SSSI’s and additional
information concerning Natura 2000 sites available at: http://naturalresources.wales
This includes citations explaining why SSSI’s have been notified and the site management
plans incorporating the conservation objectives for Natura 2000 sites.
Protected sites that may be notified for features sensitive to changes in flow are:
Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)
Special Protection Areas (SPAs)
Ramsar sites
Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)
WFD Water Bodies at High Ecological Status (HES) or Quality Elements at high status
Geological Conservation Review (GCR) sites
National Nature Reserves (NNRs)
Supporting habitats:
Supporting habitats are defined as habitats that support the notified features of designated
sites for all or part of their life cycle, or provide food or shelter for such species.
Designated sites usually include the supporting habitats for the species or features for
which they are notified. However mobile species of designated sites may make use of
other supporting habitat outside the designated site boundary if there are no effective
barriers limiting their movement to these areas.
Page 19 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
Examples of notified mobile species commonly required to be considered by hydropower
schemes in Wales include several fish species (Eg. salmon) and native white clawed
crayfish.
Protected species
Non-designated sites but where EU or UK protected species are present: e.g. native white-
clawed crayfish, otter, water vole, Killarney fern and certain bryophytes and lichens.
For schemes in Zone 1 the following indicative mitigation standards will apply:
Table 2. Indicative mitigation for Zone 1 sites with depleted reach
Low flow protection
(Hands off Flow)
% take of available flow Maximum abstraction rate
Minimum of Q95 10 to 40% 1.3 x Qmean
Where flow sensitive protected species are present, a scheme will need to be able to
operate in such a way so as to allow environmental conditions to be met that are
consistent with the achievement of a site’s conservation objectives or species’ favourable
conservation status.
We recommend that you talk to Natural Resources Wales early in the development
process to establish if and how protected species will need to be taken into account in
relation to a proposed scheme. Further survey work may be required to provide adequate
information to allow us to determine the likely operational licence conditions to adequately
safeguard these important features. Depending on the site specific situation, it is possible
that mitigation measures will be able to address potential impacts and that alternative
mitigation standards to those shown in the table above can be applied.
Zone 2 – Lower catchment streams and rivers - gradient less than 10%. These are sites with an average depleted reach gradient less than 10%. These are
typically shallow gradient rivers and streams that do not have specific protected site status.
Hydropower development in this zone has the potential of a large spatial impact due to
interruptions to longitudinal connectivity within a river ecosystem.
Page 20 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
For schemes in Zone 2 the following indicative mitigation standards will apply:
Table 3. Indicative mitigation for Zone 2 sites with depleted reach
Low flow protection
(Hands off Flow)
% take of available flow Maximum abstraction rate
Minimum of Q95 50% 1.3 x Qmean
Zone 3 – Upper catchment streams and rivers - gradient greater than 10%. These are typically steeper gradient, upland catchments where hydropower development
will have a constrained spatial impact on longitudinal connectivity and river ecosystem
structure and function.
For schemes in Zone 3 the following indicative mitigation standards will apply:
Table 4. Indicative mitigation for Zone 3 sites with depleted reach
Low flow protection
(Hands off Flow)
% take of available flow Maximum abstraction rate
Minimum of Q95 70% Qmean
8. Tier 2 Site Specific mitigation for all proposed schemes Applicants should use the Tier 1 checklists in this guidance to identify the management
zone in which a proposed scheme is located and establish indicative flow mitigation
requirements.
The purpose of Tier 2 is to allow additional site information to be used for a more detailed
assessment of environmental risk. This could mean that a scheme may move to an
Page 21 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
alternative management zone with subsequent application of that zones mitigation
requirements. Additional topographic, ecological or geomorphological surveys and
assessments will likely be needed to demonstrate that flow mitigation for a scheme will still
be able to meet appropriate environmental standards.
In exceptional circumstances it may be appropriate for flow mitigation to be further tailored
to meet specific environmental or operational conditions. Applicants are advised to discuss
these requirements with NRW staff at the earliest opportunity in the application process.
Some important considerations of physical and environmental characteristics of a site that
could support movement between zones are:
An understanding of the impacts of a hydropower scheme on the mechanisms by which
changes in river flow affect protected flow sensitive species, features or habitat.
Catchment description in terms of gradient, contributing inflows and physical barriers
8.1 Schemes with the potential to be Supporting Habitat for a SAC A scheme proposed in a river outside a protected site boundary but in continuity with a
SAC notified for one or more flow sensitive mobile species, such as salmon, has the
potential to be a Supporting Habitat. The scheme would, at a Tier 1 level, be initially
categorised as being in Zone 1.
Where it can be shown that the site does not qualify as Supporting Habitat then the
respective mitigation standards for Zones 2 and 3 would apply according to the gradient of
the depleted reach and additional site specific characteristics.
In this case movement from Zone 1 will be based on an assessment of the site to confirm
the absence of mobile SAC species or the habitat that can be reasonably considered to
support them now or in the future.
Applicants should complete the assessment and submit it to NRW in support of a licence
application. The assessment may be based on existing data where available and/or new
site surveys for protected species and habitats. Applicants are advised to contact NRW at
an early stage in the application process if they are seeking an alternative to the indicative
mitigation standards. Survey requirements and their specifications are set out in the
supporting information notes (in preparation).
Page 22 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
8.2 Schemes within a protected site - SACs and Supporting Habitat Schemes proposed within a SAC notified for flow sensitive features, or affecting
Supporting Habitat are subject to a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) (see
Hydropower Guidance Note 4 Designated sites for further information). Natural Resources
Wales are responsible for completing the HRA.
Applicants will need to provide evidence to support the completion of an HRA. The HRA
must conclude that a proposed hydropower scheme will not adversely affect the protected
features that collectively are necessary to maintain the overall integrity of the SAC.
Applicants could be required to carry out environmental surveys and assess the impact of
a proposed scheme on protected features.
Flow mitigation standards must not prevent the conservation objectives of the site from
being achieved. These will typically be the indicative standards for Zone 1. In exceptional
cases it will be possible for Zone 2 or Zone 3 mitigation standards to be applied where it
can be shown that a scheme will not affect the flow sensitive features.
A scheme may only be permitted where NRW can conclude through the Habitats
Regulations Assessment that the abstraction will not adversely affect the integrity of the
SAC.
Sites of Special Scientific Interest Where a scheme is proposed within a SSSI, the indicative mitigation standards for Zone 1
apply.
Applicants can seek to deviate from Zone 1 standards when evidence is provided
demonstrating that the operation of a proposed hydropower scheme will have a low risk of
impact on protected features of the site. Applicants will need to undertake environmental
surveys and an impact assessment to demonstrate this. Applicants are also advised to
contact NRW at an early stage in the application process to confirm survey and
assessment requirements.
Non SAC protected species outside a designated site Hydropower scheme development is likely to have greatest risk of impact on otters and
water vole during the construction phase. Applicants will be advised on survey
requirements for these species in this context.
Page 23 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
The mitigation standards for management zones will normally be adequate for the
protection of water voles and otters. NRW will advise applicants at the pre-application
stage if higher standards of mitigation for these species are required.
Native white-clawed crayfish are restricted to catchments in mid and south Wales where
water quality and other factors are suitable for their survival, with particularly important
populations in the River Wye and other rivers on the Welsh borders. NRW staff will advise
whether developers will need to undertake surveys based on the location of a proposed
scheme and the likelihood of crayfish being present.
NRW considers Zone 1 mitigation standards to be the appropriate protection for crayfish
where they are shown to be present.
8.3 Zone movement according to site characteristics of gradient, contributing inflows and physical barriers In some instances a proposed scheme may have a depleted reach gradient of less than
10%, initially qualifying for Zone 2 flow mitigation, but where physical or ecological
characteristics of the site can be used to show that it may be acceptable for Zone 3
mitigation to be applied.
Principle site characteristics are detailed below.
9. Zone movement according to site characteristics of gradient, contributing
inflows and physical barriers In some instances a proposed scheme may have a depleted reach gradient of less than
10%, initially qualifying for Zone 2 flow mitigation, but where physical or ecological
characteristics of the site can be used to show that it may be acceptable for Zone 3
mitigation to be applied.
Principle site characteristics are detailed below.
Gradient Channel bed gradient has been used as a measure to define the location of a depleted
reach within a catchment and describe its likely hydrological and geomorphological
characteristics. It is calculated by dividing the difference in elevation between the points of
abstraction and discharge by the length of the river channel to provide an average channel
gradient for the depleted reach.
Page 24 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
A 10% gradient is used as a threshold to categorise catchment types. Schemes with bed
gradients greater than 10% typically identify steeper, headwater catchments that are
responsive to rainfall and have flashy, upland hydrological and higher energy
geomorphological regimes (Zone 3 Upper catchments). Sites with gradients less than 10%
are more likely to describe lower catchment streams and rivers that have a larger
upstream catchment, are less responsive to rainfall and have a depositional
geomorphological regime with finer bed materials (Zone 2 Lower catchments).
Our approach to licensing hydropower aims to reduce the risk of introducing physical and
hydrological barriers that interrupt catchment connectivity in lower catchments and
minimise spatial impact of hydropower development in upland catchments. We also
recognise that abstraction for hydropower has proportionally less impact on flow variability
in upland catchments with flashy hydrological regimes.
We will consider deviation of a Zone 2 scheme (depleted reach gradient <10%) to Zone 3
where it can be shown that the scheme can meet the principles of our approach. Where
the depleted reach gradient is less than 10% the following combined characteristics of the
site will be considered;
Responsive hydrological regime
The flow regime at the point of abstraction can be shown to have a flashy hydrological
regime or where there is uncertainty in the site hydrology the upstream catchment can also
be shown to have impermeable geology;
Upstream catchment characteristics
The average gradient of the principle channel in the catchment upstream of the point of
abstraction is 10% or greater;
Upstream catchment size
The catchment upstream of the point of abstraction represents a headwater tributary and
development of a scheme will not affect ecosystem connectivity within the river catchment.
Contributing inflows
Schemes must provide the indicative Zone mitigation as the minimum standard of
environmental protection along the length of a depleted reach. Tributary inflows to a
Page 25 of 25 www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk
depleted reach may provide additional mitigation through the introduction of flow volume
and variability.
Developers intending to incorporate tributary inflows into their mitigation proposals will be
required to submit a hydrological assessment in support of a licence application. The
hydrological assessment will demonstrate that the necessary environmental standards are
being met along the course of the depleted reach.
Barriers
A scheme will not be permitted to create a barrier to migratory salmonids by reducing flows
over an existing structure (natural or artificial) that is currently passable under the existing
hydrological regime.
In contrast existing artificial barriers, such as bridge footings or old weirs, currently prevent
migratory salmonids from accessing some upstream catchments. During the abstraction
licence determination process we will have regard for such barriers and consider the
likelihood of improvements to them to ease fish passage. Where we consider fish passage
improvements are likely to be made in the future we may need to constrain the rates of
abstraction for hydropower schemes proposed upstream.