HYDROPOWER
Themes:
1. Ongoing interest group conflict over:
• development vs. environment (universal)
• public vs. private ownership
2. How the licensing process deals with these conflicts
Introduction to administrative process
HYDROPOWER
When did people first start harnessing hydropower for industrial purposes?
HYDROPOWER
When did people first start harnessing hydropower for industrial purposes?
How do hydroelectric projects work? How do they generate electricity?
HYDROPOWER
When did people first start harnessing hydropower for industrial purposes?
How do hydroelectric projects work? How do they generate electricity?
How is hydroelectric development regulated in the United States?
HYDROELECTRIC LICENSING TIMELINE
1700s-early 1900s: development of water resources by private mill owners
Early 1900s: first development for power; first publicly-owned projects
1935: Modern version of Federal Power Act passed
• requires federal license to build project
NOTE: Federal water projects do not require a license. Many of these projects are publicly-owned (BPA, TVA, etc.)
Licensing Process
Administered by agency (FERC)
Subject to statutory constraints
• private intervenors
• agency intervenors/commenters
• owners (public and private)
Decisions appealable within agency and ultimately to the courts: grounds for appeal?
HYDROELECTRIC LICENSING TIMELINE
1700s-early 1900s: development of water resources by private mill owners
Early 1900s: first development for power; first publicly-owned projects
1935: Modern version of Federal Power Act passed
1944: First Iowa decision
(see also CA v. FERC)Who has the last word in the
licensing process? What power do other agencies and actors have?
How has FERC traditionally resolved environmental conflicts at licensing?
Udall v. FPC (1967)
1. What is the basis of this litigation? What (action) is being challenged here, and why?
2. What (allegedly) did the FPC do wrong in this case?
3. Is this a dispute over who gets the license? Whether to issue the license? What are the statutory standards at issue here?
Scenic Hudson v. FPC (1965)
1. What action is being challenged? By whom? Why?
2. What is the alleged failure on FPC’s part in this case?
3. What is the statutory standard that governs the FPC’s decision here?
Must all hydroelectric projects acquire a license from the FERC? Are there limits to FERC’s hydroelectric licensing jurisdiction?
Fairfax County Water Auth. (1988)
1. What is the basis of this dispute? Who is suing who and why?
2. What does the Federal Power Act say about the limit’s of the FERC’s licensing jurisdiction?
3. Must the Authority get a license for these projects? Why or why not?
Is FERC’s power to decide environmental issues in the licensing process absolute?
• FPA Sec. 4(e) amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005
• ECPA?
American Rivers v. FERC (1997)
1. What is the basis of this dispute? Who is suing who and why?
2. What does CWA Sec. 401 say? What does it mean in the context of hydro licensing?
3. Must the Authority get a license for these projects? Why or why not?
Figure 1: FERC Licensing Activity, 1960-1990
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
No.
Cumulative Total
No. Licenses Issued
Figure 4: Avg. Generating Capacity, Licensed Projects
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1960-65 1966-70 1971-75 1976-80 1981-85 1986-90
Kilo
wat
ts
Figure 5: New Dam Licenses, Post-NEPA
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
ExstDams
New Dams
Figure 2: Success Rates of Selected Intervenors in FERC Issue Decisions
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
EnvironmentalGroups
Fish andWildlifeService
StateEnvironmental
Agencies
PCT. WIN PCT. PARTIAL WIN PCT. LOSE
HYDROELECTRIC LICENSING TIMELINE
1700s-early 1900s: development of water resources by private mill owners
Early 1900s: first development for power; first publicly-owned projects
1935: Modern version of Federal Power Act passed
1944: First Iowa decision
1953: Namekagon decision
1960s: Scenic Hudson decision
1969: NEPA
1978: PURPA
1986: ECPA
1997: RELICENSING: Edwards Dam decision - EXERCISE
Large hydro vs. small hydro
• UN commission on dams
• Displacement of people
• Cost / benefits analyses, with and without hindsight
Hydro Development by Governments
How do interest groups assert their interests when the government considers proposed hydroelectric projects? What are the avenues of influence?
What does the UN Commission on Dams say about how large dam projects have balanced development and environmental interests?
What role do the following factors play?– Wealth / economic conditions of the community/nation
(developed vs. developing world)– Political / governmental regime type (democratic vs.
other)– Awareness of ecosystem issues: development pre- or
post-1970s
NEXT CLASS: EXERCISE
Issue: Whether to relicense the Hells Canyon Project on the Snake River in Idaho
ROLES:
• FERC
• Idaho Power
• American Rivers