Date post: | 29-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | amanda-gordon |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
LESSONS LEARNED ON THE REGULATION OF NUCLEAR SAFETY
Presentation to the Workshop on Lessons Learned from IRRS Missions
Moscow, Russian Federation
9-11 December 2014
IAEA IRRS enhancements 2
Outline
• Basis of presentation
• Analysis of references
• Lessons Learned on the Regulatory Framework
IAEA IRRS enhancements 3
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
IAEA IRRS enhancements 4
Missions in 2006-2014
Korea (f)
Niger UAE Zimbabwe
Mexico Germany Canada (f) France
Mauritius Ukraine Russia Switzerland Netherlands
Cameroon Sierra Leone UK (part 2) Australia (f) Belgium Cameroon
Kenya Namibia Vietnam Slovenia Czech Rep. Vietnam (f)
Uganda Madagascar Lebanon Ukraine (f) Germany (f) Finland Russia (f) Slovenia (f)
France Gabon Botswana Canada USA Korea Greece UK (f) Jordan
UK Australia Spain Peru China Spain (f) Slovakia Poland Pakistan
Romania Japan Cote d'Ivoire France (f) Iran Romania Sweden Bulgaria USA (f)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
3 9 8 7 4 9 4 6 10
IAEA IRRS enhancements 5
IAEA Nuclear Safety Action Plan
IAEA is to “Strengthen IAEA peer reviews in order to maximize the benefits to Member States”.
In specific:
2.4.1 IAEA Secretariat to review the effectiveness of their peer reviews
To set the basis for this action an analysis of past IRRS missions has been performed
IAEA IRRS enhancements 6
Missions analysed
• Initial (22) an follow-up (9) missions in 2006-2014 to countries with nuclear power plants
Niger UAEMexico Germany Canada (f)
Mauritius Ukraine Russia SwitzerlandCameroon Sierra Leone UK (part 2) Australia (f) Belgium
Kenya Namibia Vietnam Slovenia Czech Rep.Uganda Madagascar Lebanon Ukraine (f) Germany (f) Finland Russia (f)
France Gabon Botswana Canada USA Korea Greece UK (f)UK Australia Spain Peru China Spain (f) Slovakia Poland
Romania Japan Cote d'Ivoire France (f) Iran Romania Sweden Bulgaria USA (f)2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
IAEA IRRS enhancements 7
Details of analysis reported
http://gnssn.iaea.org/regnet/irrs/Pages/IRRS_pub_docs.aspx
IAEA IRRS enhancements 8
IRRS Modules
IAEA IRRS enhancements 9
Observations and their types
• Observations lead to:• Recommendation• Suggestion• Good Practice
Findings
Observation: focused results of the review process, based on facts and related to possible ways of improvement or achievements to recognise, with reference to requirements in IAEA Safety Standards
obs
erva
tions
IAEA IRRS enhancements 10
This BASIS is a Reference to GSR Part 1 Requirement 4
Format of an Observation
Quotation from the relevant IAEA Safety Standard that is to be / has been followed. (There may be more than one Bases)
Recommendation / suggestion / good practice offered by the reviewer
A description of what the reviewer observed, that has lead to the present finding or good practice
IAEA IRRS enhancements 11
ANALYSIS OF REFERENCES
IAEA IRRS enhancements 12
References to IAEA safety standards
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Num
ber o
f ref
eren
ces
Module number
R&S references to GSR Part 1 and elsewhere from Modules to GSR Part 1 to other standards
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Num
ber o
f ref
eren
ces
Module number
GP References to GSR Part 1 and elsewhere from Modules to GSR Part 1 to other standards
GSR Part 1 is indeed the IAEA safety standard that plays a central role in the IRRS process, further basic references are GS-R- 3 and GS-R-2.
IAEA IRRS enhancements 13
Frequently referred Requirements
• R24: Demonstration of safety for the authorization of facilities and activities in Module 5;
• R18: Staffing and competence of the regulatory body in Module 3;
• R20: Liaison with advisory bodies and support organizations in Module 3;
• R32: Regulations and guides in Module 9.
2.41 2.362.09 2.09
1.68 1.64 1.59 1.45
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
24 18 20 32 2 27 25 29
Num
ber o
f ref
eren
ces p
er m
issi
ons
GSR Part 1 Requirement number
Most frequent references to GSR Part 1EU missions non-EU missions all missions
3 635 9 1 7 7
Findings, referencing GSR Part 1 Requirements relating to core regulatory functions from initial missions comprise a dominant part of all references
IAEA IRRS enhancements 14
LESSONS LEARNED ON THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
IAEA IRRS enhancements 15
Statistics of observations analysed
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Num
ber
of o
bser
vati
ons
Modules
Number of observations in all missionsRecommendations Suggestions Good Practices
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V
Num
ber o
f ob
serv
ation
s
Missions
Observations in initial MissionsR S GP R+S Ʃ
by Modules by missions
IAEA IRRS enhancements 16
The Subject Group approach
• In order to analyse the technical contents of the findings they are classified into Subject Groups (SGs).
• The purpose of this grouping is to collect the observations having similar characters into statistically meaningful groups
• E.g.:SG 1d): Providing/using legal framework for regulatory activities includes findings related to
• revision of regulations to provide authority; • reflecting independence of the regulatory body; • issuance of decrees and orders; • relieving time constraints on decision making.
IAEA IRRS enhancements 17
The most populated SGs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1.d 7.a 9.b 7.c 3.a 4.a 10.e 3.f 4.b 9.a 3.c 3.g 1.a
Num
ber o
f find
ings
per
miss
ions
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most findings
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
3.f 3.g 7.d 1.e 10.b 9.a 6.a 7.a 2.a 3.a 10.d
Num
ber o
f Go
od P
racti
ces
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most GPs
IAEA IRRS enhancements 18
Characteristic examples of issues (1)
The most populated Subject Group, Providing/using legal framework for regulatory authorities, (Module 1) includes the following typical recommendationsThe government should
• establish the legal framework for an effectively independent, unambiguously authorized regulatory body with clear division of responsibilities;
• provide the regulatory body with the authority to issue or the involvement in issuance of regulatory requirements;
• provide full provisions for appealsThe addressee of these findings is the government and the issue raised is lack of specific legal provisions necessary for discharging regulatory responsibilities.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1.d 7.a 9.b 7.c 3.a 4.a 10.e 3.f 4.b 9.a 3.c 3.g 1.a
Nu
mb
er o
f fin
din
gs p
er m
issi
on
s
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most findings
IAEA IRRS enhancements 19
Characteristic examples of issues (2)
Developing inspection programme (Module 7) is the second most frequent SG. Typical findings therein are:The regulatory body should (or should consider to)
• expand the inspection programme (in scope, in types, in frequency);
• develop further its inspection system (initiation, methodology, monitoring, evaluation);
• improve inspection planning.
This is a fairly homogeneous group of findings, the addressee of which is the regulatory body and the main issue is shortcomings in the inspection methodology applied.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1.d 7.a 9.b 7.c 3.a 4.a 10.e 3.f 4.b 9.a 3.c 3.g 1.a
Nu
mb
er o
f fin
din
gs p
er m
issi
on
s
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most findings
IAEA IRRS enhancements 20
SG Reviewing regulations and guides (Module 9) is the third among the most frequent ones with typical findings: The regulatory body should (or should consider to)
• systematically and periodically review and revise as necessary the regulations, regulatory requirements and guidance;
• introduce formalized gap analysis between IAEA requirements and national regulations.
This group also addresses the regulatory body and points to weaknesses in review and revision of regulations.
Characteristic examples of issues (3)0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1.d 7.a 9.b 7.c 3.a 4.a 10.e 3.f 4.b 9.a 3.c 3.g 1.a
Nu
mb
er o
f fin
din
gs p
er m
issi
on
s
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most findings
IAEA IRRS enhancements 21
Characteristic examples of issues (4)
The most frequent Subject Group of Good Practices is External involvement in the regulatory process (Module 3). Typical observations are
• taking advice and assistance from advisory committees, Technical Support Organizations;
• regular contact with the licensees and manufacturers.
The most frequently commended activity is accepting technical assistance.
(Note that this activity is fairly common among the regulatory bodies and as such it would not qualify for a Good Practice – pointing to a weakness in the process).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
3.f 3.g 7.d 1.e 10.b 9.a 6.a 7.a 2.a 3.a 10.d
Num
ber o
f G
ood
Prac
tices
Subject Group
Subject Groups with the most GPs
IAEA IRRS enhancements 22
Dual issues
• Certain subjects appear both as findings and as Good Practices:
• Developing the inspection program (2nd in findings, 8th in GPs)• Staffing of RB (5th in findings, 10th
in GPs) • External involvement (1st in GPs, 8th in findings)
R+S GP 1) 1.d 3.f 2) 7.a 3.g 3) 9.b 7.d 4) 7.c 1.e 5) 3.a 10.b 6) 4.a 9.a 7) 10.e 6.a 8) 3.f 7.a 9) 4.b 2.a10) 9.a 3.a
IAEA IRRS enhancements 23
Follow-up missions
• Limited amount of data from 9 missions• Progress can be characterized by the number of
issues remained open and by the number of new issues
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
num
ber o
f find
ings
Progress in follow-ups by ModulesInitial findings open issues new findings
IAEA IRRS enhancements 24
Issues remained open
• 69 open issues • The most populated Subject Groups are:
• Details of the MS, developing MS manual (Module 4) – 6 pcs• Resources of the RB (Module 3) – 5 pcs
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
Minimum Average Maximum
open
issu
es/i
ntial
issu
es
Ratio of open issues in follow-upsRecommendations Suggestions All
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
num
ber r
atio
of fi
ndin
gs
Modules
Ratio of open and new issues
IAEA IRRS enhancements 25
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Photo: V. FriedrichThis activity is conducted by the IAEA, with funding by the European Union. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission