IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group. Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights...

IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.

9100 Series2016 Revision Overview9100 TeamJuly, 2014

1

IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved. 2

9100 Revision – The Plan

9100 Series Revision High Level Plan The 9100 is based on ISO 9001 and is thus affected by the

ISO TC176 revision activity Revision guidance published in 9100:2016 Design

Specification 5 IAQG standards are based on the 9100 standard and will

require revision in parallel with 9100 (9110, 9120, 9115, 9137, 9101 = 9100 Series)

Revision focus is to add clarity, enhance ease of use, while addressing industry and stakeholder needs

The IAQG 9100 Series standards are planned for project completion in 2016


9100 Series includes the following IAQG standards:

IAQG 9100 QMS –Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense Orgs -

IAQG Series Baseline Standard

: IAQG 9110 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation Maintenance Organizations

: IAQG 9115 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense Orgs - Deliverable Software

: IAQG 9120 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense Distributors

: IAQG 9137 Guidance for the Application of AQAP 2110 within a 9100 QMS

: IAQG 9101 QMS Audit Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations

: IAQG 9104 Oversight of Certification Scheme

3

9100 Series

3


9100 AAQG SDRLockheed Martin

Buddy Cressionnie

9101 IDRMitsubishi Heavy Industries

Masahiro Kawamoto

9100 EAQG SDRZodiac Aerospace

Brigitte Clamens

9110 IDRAirbus

Agathe Moll

9100 APAQG SDRMitsubishi Heavy Industries

Masahiro Kawamoto

9120 IDRAerojet

Dale Gordon

9100 ScribeIAQG

Wayne Johnson

9137 IDRAirbus Military

Juan Ignacio Martin

9115 IDRRaytheon

Ray Wright

Inse

rtP

ictu

reH

ere

Integration of Standards

9100 AAQG RepresentativeUnited Technologies Corporation

Jim Clifford

9100 EAQG RepresentativeEuropean Space Agency

Roberto Ciaschi

9100 APAQG RepresentativeAviation Industry Corporation (AVIC)

Chen Zhongyuan

9100 AAQG RepresentativeTriumph

Kim Roy

9100 EAQG RepresentativeRolls-Royce

Stuart Anthony

9100 APAQG RepresentativeKawasaki Heavy Industries

Tatsuya Shirai

9100 IDR – Team LeaderBoeing

Alan Daniels

IAQG 9100 Series Team

IAQG 9100 Series Team

4


AAQG 9100 Team

EAQG 9100 Team

APAQG 9100 Team

AAQSC Sector

9100 Team

EAQG Sector

9100 Team

APAQG Sector

9100 Team

Stakeholder Team

Representatives

Sector 9100 Team Meetings to gather Sector inputs and develop Sector positions. Operation managed at Sector Level (58)

Representatives of Sector 9100 Team at Int’l Meetings (6)

IAQG 9100 Team collects sector and stakeholder input and writes the revision (16)

IAQG/Sector 9100 Team Structure

5

IAQG 9100 Writing Team collects sector and stakeholder input and creates a rough draft. (8)

IAQG 9100 Team


AAQG/AAQSC Leader: - Buddy Cressionnie (LM)

AAQG Members: - Jim Clifford (UTC)

- Kim Roy (Triumph)

- Dale Gordon, 9120 IDR (Aerojet)

AAQSC Members:

- Kevin Beard (NQA) - Liz Walters (Boeing)

- Eric Jeffries (Bell/Textron) - Debra Hensley (Bell/Textron)

- John Graham (PNAA) - Brian Geer (LM)

- Robert Bodemuller (Ball) - Dave Leeson (GD)

- Helen Kiesel (Goodrich) - Kim Roy (Triumph)

- Erin Anderson (Honeywell) - Greg Burns (PneuDraulics)

- Craig Bennett (DCMA HQ) - Aaron Troschinetz (SAI Global)

- Bill Sacco (GE Aviation) - Rob Chagnon (Rockwell Collins)

6

AAQSC Sector 9100 Team


IAQG 9100 Revision SIPOC

SUPPLIERS

IAQG 9100 SeriesStandard

DeploymentSupportMaterial

Plan

Check

DoA

ct

SWG Enlarged Strategy

Stakeholder Input & Survey

Options Risk Assessment

ISO 9001Gap Analysis

Aviation,Space &Defense

Industries

Publishing Sectors

Project Plan

Integrated Schedule

Design Specification

BallotCoordination

Draft

Master Comments Review

Item # Stake-holder Code

Clause No. Comment Proposed Change Rationale / Benefite.g., clarification, improve quality, reduce

cost, other

Accept/Reject/Noted

Team Proposal ActionComplete

45 Survey Title Remove "Quality" from title Managment System The first word is "Quallity" and everyone immediately thinls it is a Quality function/responsibility, not a Management function.

Reject - ISO

ISO text.

X

53 Survey Title Title Change Modify title to Business Managment System vs. Quality Management System

Requirements are incorporated for entire business, and individuals continuously focus on Quality when addressing standard.

Reject - ISO

ISO text.

X

64 Survey Title Change title of standard from "Quality Manangement System" to "Business Management System"

We've come a long way, but some still feel implimentation and adhearance to the standard is the job of Quality.

Reject - ISO

ISO text.

X

111 CAA Title Expand the title to cover SMS Use: "Quality Management Systems …" and make changes for consistency throughout the document

When SMS is introduced it is no longer restricted to a quality system.

Reject SMS will be covered by sub-team

X

323 EAQG Title Title is more biased towards Aerospace than inclusive of Defense

Amend wording from Aerospace Standard to Defense Standard

Inclusive of all sectors Reject

X

187 AAQG Foreword verbiage confusing (no header at start of 1st statement to define the incomplete sentence and extra commas)

"To assure customer satisfaction, aviation, space and defense organizations must produce, and continually improve, safe, reliable products …" should be "Objective: To assure customer satisfaction, aviation, space and defense organizations must produce and continually improve safe, reliable products …"

clarification Accept in Principle

Writing Team to consider comments

113 CAA 0.1 There is no need to explain the potential application of the standard when it has many different uses.

This International Standard can be used by internal and external parties, including certification bodies, toassess the organization's ability to meet customer, statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to theproduct, and the organization's own requirements.

The current "used by" is not exhaustive and might be misinterpreted.

Pending DIS

254 EAQG 0.2 ISO Text First §, the sentence: "The international Standard promotes the adoption of a process approach" , can be understood as a recommandation and not a requirement. That is not consistent with the "General requirements", clause n°4.1 where a process approach implementation is clearly required: "The organization shall determine the processes needed for the quality management system and their application throughout the organization"This requirement appears also in several sub-clauses (e;g., 7.1 - 7.1.2 - 7.1.3 - 7.1.4 - 7.4.1.e - 7.5.1.h - 7.5.7.1 - 7.5.2 - 7.6 - 8.1):"The organization shall establish, implement and maintain a process for"

Clause N°0.2:- Introduce the adoption of a process approach as a requirement needed to develop, implement and improve the effectiveness of a quality management system; - Preconize to identify 3 processes family /groupe: Management process; Realization process and Support process.

Clarification

Improve quality

Pending DIS

If intent of proposal is accepted - any "shall" or requirement must be established in the requirements section of the standard (Clause 1-10)

1 LinkedIn 0.4 Clause 0.4 from ISO 9001 (covering compatability with other management systems) has been omitted from AS/EN 9100.

Re-introduce ISO 9001 Clause 0.4 to clarify the relativity of 9100 with other management Standards.

Clarification Pending DIS

IAQG 9100 TeamData Mining - Master Comments Review Template

As of 2013-12-21

IAQG 9100 Team Disposition

Priority FocusTeams

Team is currently well into “Do” and will transition to “Check”

7PROCESSINPUTS OUTPUTS CUSTOMERS


IAQGReview Of ISO

9001 DIS

8


4. Context of the organization 4.1 Understanding the organization and its

context 4.2 Understanding the needs and

expectations of interested parties4.3 Determining the scope of the quality

management system 4.4 Quality management system and its

processes5. Leadership

5.1 Leadership and commitment5.2 Quality policy5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and

authorities6. Planning for the quality management

system6.1 Actions to address risks and

opportunities6.2 Quality objectives and planning to

achieve them6.3 Planning of changes

7. Support 7.1 Resources 7.2 Competence 7.3 Awareness 7.4 Communication 7.5 Documented information

8. Operation 8.1 Operational planning and control8.2 Determination of requirements for

products and services8.3 Design and development of products

and services8.4 Control of externally provided products

and services8.5 Production and service provision8.6 Production of products and provision of

services8.6 Release of products and services8.7 Control of nonconforming process

outputs, products and services9. Performance evaluation

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis & evaluation

9.2 Internal audit 9.3 Management review

10. Improvement 10.1 General10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action 10.2 Continual Improvement

1.Scope 2.Normative references 3.Terms and definitions

ISO New Clause Structure

9

PLAN

DO

CHECK

ACT


QMS Structure

4 Context of the organization

4.1Understanding of the organization and its context

4.2 Expectations of interested parties

4.3 Scope of the quality management system system

4.4 Quality management system and its processes

5 Leadership

5.1 Leadership and commitment

5.2 Quality policy

5.3 Roles, responsibilities and authorities

6 Planning

6.1 Actions to address risk and opportunity

6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve

7 Support

7.1 Resources

7.2 Competence

7.3 Awareness

7.4 Communication

8 Operation

8.1 Operational of planning and control

8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services

8.3 Design and development of products and services

8.4 Control of externally provided products and services

8.5 Production and service provision

9 Performance and evaluation

9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

9.2 Internal audit

9.3 Management review

10 Improvement

10.1 General

10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

PLAN DO CHECK ACT

7.5 Documented information

6.3 Planning of changes

8.6 Production of products and provision of services

8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services

10.3 Continual improvement


Jun 2013 CD ballot startsSep 2013 Close of CD ballotNov 2013 Prepare DIS (Rough Draft)

Jul 2014 DIS BallotOct 2014 DIS Ballot ClosedNov 2014 Prepare FDISFeb 2015 FDIS to ISO Central SecretariatJul 2015 FDIS BallotSep 2015 Publish ISO 9001:2015These dates are contingent on consensus on decisions / ballots to proceed at each stage.

ISO Timeline

11


IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review

The 9100 baseline ISO 9001:2015 has released their Draft International Standard (DIS) for review

The International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG), as a new Liaison member of the ISO group, has an opportunity to provide comments to the DIS

Action - 9100 Writing Team to review the DIS and provide comments for the IAQG

Action – Report DIS assessment in the July IAQG SWG meeting and provide a 9100 Team position

ISO/TC 176/SC 2 1

Date: 2014-05-8 2

ISO/DIS 9001 3

ISO/TC 176/SC 2/WG 24 4

Secretariat: BSI 5

Quality management systems — 6

Requirements 7

Systèmes de management de la qualité — Exigences 8

9

Warning 10

This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is 11 subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard. 12

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent 13 rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. 14

15

Warning 16

THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS 17 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL 18 STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH. 19

IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, 20 TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL 21 STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR 22 POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN NATIONAL 23 REGULATIONS. 24

RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS, 25 NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO 26 PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. 27



ISO 9001:2015 Cross Reference to ISO 9001:2008 May 15, 2014

• The following includes a cross reference from the ISO 9001:2015 Draft International Standard (DIS) to ISO 9001:2008.

• This is not the official cross reference that will be provided in the final version of ISO 9001:2015. In the interim, this document can be used to highlight where the new and revised clauses are located.

• Please note Annex A of the DIS states the following:

A.1 Structure and terminology

• The clause structure and some of the terminology of this International Standard, in comparison with ISO 9001:2008, have been changed to improve alignment with other management systems standards.

• The consequent changes in the structure and terminology do not need to be reflected in the documentation of an organization’s quality management system.

• The structure of clauses is intended to provide a coherent presentation of requirements rather than a model for documenting an organization’s policies, objectives and processes. There is no requirement for the structure of an organization's quality management system documentation to mirror that of this International Standard.

ISO 9001:2008 ISO 9001:2015

4.1 General

Introduction

4.1 Understanding the organization and its context

4.1 General 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

1.2 Application

4.2.2 Quality Manual

4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system

4.1 General 4.4 Quality management system and its processes

5 Leadership

5.1 Management Commitment 5.1 Leadership and commitment

We provided to the 9100 Team for the assessment:

ISO 9001:2015 DIS

ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Cross Reference (before and after)

Overlay of the ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 standards

Overlay of the ISO 9001:2015 CD, which was cause for concern, and the much improved ISO 9001:2015 DISCopyright - limited to team standard development activity


Comparison Matrix

ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015

14

9100 RevisionISO 9001 Correlation Matrix

ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Correlation Matrix

June 16, 2014

• The following includes a correlation matrix from the ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Draft International Standard (DIS)

• This correlation matrix will be provided in the published version of ISO 9001:2015. In the interim, this document can be used to highlight where the new and revised clauses are located.

• Please note Annex A of the DIS states the following:

A.1 Structure and terminology

• The clause structure and some of the terminology of this International Standard, in comparison with ISO 9001:2008, have been changed to improve alignment with other management systems standards.

• The consequent changes in the structure and terminology do not need to be reflected in the documentation of an organization’s quality management system.

• The structure of clauses is intended to provide a coherent presentation of requirements rather than a model for documenting an organization’s policies, objectives and processes. There is no requirement for the structure of an organization's quality management system documentation to mirror that of this International Standard.

ISO 9001:2008 ISO 9001:2015

4 Quality management system 4 Context of the organization 4.1 General

Introduction

4.1 Understanding the organization and its context

4.1 General 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

1.2 Application

4.2.2 Quality manual

4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system

4.1 General 4.4 Quality management system and its processes

5.5 Responsibility, authority and communication

5 Leadership

5.1 Management commitment 5.1 Leadership and commitment

5.1 Management commitment 5.1.1 Leadership and commitment for the quality management system

5.2 Customer focus 5.1.2 Customer focus

5.3 Quality policy 5.2 Quality policy

5.5.1 Responsibility and authority

5.5.2 Management representative

5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

5.4.2 Quality management system planning 6 Planning for the quality management system

5.4.2 Quality management system planning

8.5.3 Preventive action

6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities

5.4.1 Quality objectives 6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them

5.4.2 Quality management system planning 6.3 Planning of changes

New 7 Support 6 Resource management 7.1 Resources

6.1 Provision of resources 7.1.1 General

6.1 Provision of resources 7.1.2 People

6.3 Infrastructure 7.1.3 Infrastructure

6.4 Work environment 7.1.4 Environment for the operation of processes

7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment

7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources

New 7.1.6 Organizational knowledge

6.2.1 General

6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness

7.2 Competence

6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness 7.3 Awareness

5.5.3 Internal communication 7.4 Communication

4.2 Documentation requirements 7.5 Documented information


Comparison Matrix

ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015

15

9100 RevisionISO 9001 Correlation Matrix

4.2.1 General 7.5.1 General

4.2.3 Control of documents

4.2.4 Control of records

7.5.2 Creating and updating

4.2.3 Control of documents

4.2.4 Control of records

7.5.3 Control of documented Information

7 Product realization 8 Operation 7.1 Planning of product realization 8.1 Operational planning and control

7.2 Customer-related processes 8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services

7.2.3 Customer communication 8.2.1 Customer communication

7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product

8.2.2 Determination of requirements related to products and services

7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product

8.2.3 Review of requirements related to the products and services

7.3.1 Design and development planning 8.3 Design and development of products and services

7.3.1 Design and development planning 8.3.1 General

7.3.1 Design and development planning 8.3.2 Design and development planning

7.3.2 Design and development inputs 8.3.3 Design and development Inputs

7.3.4 Design and development review

7.3.5 Design and development verification

7.3.6 Design and development validation

8.3.4 Design and development controls

7.3.3 Design and development outputs 8.3.5 Design and development outputs

7.3.7 Design and development changes 8.3.6 Design and development changes

7.4.1 Purchasing process 8.4 Control of externally provided products and services

7.4.1 Purchasing process 8.4.1 General

7.4.1 Purchasing process 8.4.2 Type and extent of control of external provision

7.4.2 Purchasing information 8.4.3 Information for external providers

7.3 Design and development 8.5 Production and service provision

7.5.1 Control of production and service provision


7.5.3 Identification and traceability 8.5.2 Identification and traceability

7.5.4 Customer property 8.5.3 Property belonging to customers or external providers

7.5.5 Preservation of product 8.5.4 Preservation


8.5.5 Post-delivery activities

New 8.5.6 Control of changes

7.4.3 Verification of purchased product 8.6 Release of products and services

8.3 Control of nonconforming product 8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services

New 9 Performance evaluation 8.1 General 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and

evaluation

8.1 General 9.1.1 General

8.2.1 Customer satisfaction 9.1.2 Customer satisfaction

8.4 Analysis of data 9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation

8.2.2 Internal audit 9.2 Internal audit

5.6 Management review 9.3 Management review

8.5 Improvement 10 Improvement 8.5.1 Continual improvement 10.1 General

8.5.2 Corrective action 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action

8.5.1 Continual improvement 10.3 Continual Improvement


Key Changes Greater emphasis on processes

Alignment with strategic direction

Integration of the QMS into organization’s business processes

Determining risks and opportunities

Emphasis on change management

Introduction of knowledge management

Increased performance evaluation

Improvement expanded – clause

ISO 9001:2015Key Changes Summary

(51 in 2008 to 73 in 2015)

(0 in 2008 to 3 in 2015)

(0 in 2008 to 1 in 2015)

(0 in 2008 to 11 in 2015)

(13 in 2008 to 23 in 2015)

(4 in 2008 to 15 in 2015)

(11 in 2008 to 15 in 2015)

(0 in 2008 to 9 in 2015)

(number of times the word shows up in clauses 4-8 & 4-10)16



ISO 9001:2015 DIS review summary

Comments consist of clarifications, improvements and editorial proposals

111 IAQG comments received on the ISO 9001 DIS

: 55 Improve

: 28 Clarify

: 4 Editorial

: 2 Delete

: 22 Filtered (no proposed text, ISO required text, duplicates)

: 89 IAQG Comments for the ISO 9001:2015 Team



ISO 9001:2015 DIS Review Summary 18 identified by the 9100 Team as priorities

: Addition proposals:• 4.2.2 Quality manual

• 5.3 Management representative (2)

• 7.5.3.2 External documented QMS information – available for use

• 8.4.3 External provider communication - QMS requirements

• 9.2.1.b Internal audit - considers related performance indicators

: Revision proposals:• 4.1 Issues – revise terminology (factors, elements, aspects,

etc)

• 8.3.1 Design and development process - neg. to pos. statement

• 8.3.4 Design and development – action when outcome is not achieved

• 8.4.2.b Perceived effectiveness- revise terminology (measured)

• 8.5.6 Change control – revise unplanned changes



ISO 9001:2015 DIS Review Summary - cont. 18 identified by the 9100 Team as priority comments

: Definition proposals:

• Opportunities - 4.4, 5.1.2, 6.1, 9.1.3, ….

• Organizational knowledge - 7.1.6, 8.1, 8.5.6

• Unplanned changes - 8.1, 8.5.6

• Incorrect use - customer owned property - 8.5.3

:Clarification requests:

• 3.04 External providers – outsourced external providers (internal)

• 3.09 Risk – opportunities are positive effects of uncertainty - 7.1.6

• 4.2 Interested parties



ISO 9001:2015 DIS review summary The IAQG 9100 Team and 9100 Sector Teams all agreed there

are no show stopper or critical items Common terminology and its use could be better (reason for

clarification and definition requests) Comparison matrix indicates the 10 clause structure is workable Several improvements have been made in the ISO 9001:2015

: increased use of measures: risk analysis: Linkage to organizations strategic objectives and business processes

Flexibility to add requirements and guidance in the 9100 text

9100 Team recommendation is to continue use of the ISO 9001 as the 9100 series baseline


Next Steps

IAQG ISO 9001:2015 prioritized comments will be actively lobbied for implementation and tracked

The ISO 9001:2015 FDIS (Final Draft International Standard) is scheduled to be available in February 2015 and begin ballot in July 2015

21

ISO 9001:2015 RevisionNext Steps

Writing to begin on 9100:2016 using ISO 9001:2015 DIS as a baseline July 14th, 2014


Telecommunications After reviewing the ISO

9001:2015 DIS the QuEST Forum (telecommunications) has made the decision to continue using ISO 9001 as their TL 9000 standards baseline

ISO 9001:2015Key Changes Summary

22


IAQG9100 Revision

23


Oct 2013 Stakeholder Feedback ResolutionApr 2014 Concept Sub-team ProposalsJun 2014 Integrate ISO 9001 DIS with 9100

Jul 2014 ISO 9001:2015 DIS CommentsJul 2014 Structure Draft (team)Oct 2014 Working Draft (team)May 2015 Coordination Draft (IAQG)Dec 2016 Ballot (IAQG)Apr 2016 Support Material These dates are contingent on consensus on decisions / ballots to proceed at each stage.

9100 Timeline

24


9100 New Concepts

25

Concepts being evaluated (sub-teams)::Safety - product, flight (evaluate enhancement)

:Human Factors (consider inclusion)

:Risk (balance ISO 9001 addition)

:Preventive Action (assess ISO 9001 approach)

:Counterfeit Parts (consider inclusion)

:Configuration Management (request to enhance)

:Product Realization Planning (requested FAI, APQP linkages)

:Post-Delivery Support (9110/MRO linkages)

:Supplier Management (request to enhance)


Nagoya10/2012

Moscow05/2013

Montreal10/2013

San Antonio05/2012

Ballots, reviews and comments

Publications

For more information, see detailed schedule

Brussels04/2014

Long Beach10/2014

2014

Chengdu04/2015

TBD10/2015

2015

TBD04/2016

TBD10/22016

20162012 2013

TBD04/2017

TBD10/2017

2017

Plan & Stakeholders feedback

Internal DependenciesStandards & Training as needed for publication- Required for 9100 publication

- 9100 Transition Plan- 9101 Update (as required)- 9100 Training (as required)

External dependenciesISO 9001 publications• CD June 2013 – Begin struct. draft• DIS : May 2014 – Begin writing 9100• FDIS : Feb 2015 - Begin Coord. Draft• Publish : Sept. 2015 – Prep. Ballot

9100 Series RevisionIntegrated Schedule

9100 SWG/Council

Project Approval

9100BallotDraft

9100 Publish / Ballot

Comments

9100Coordination

Draft for Comments

IAQG

Comments /Structure Analysis

9100 TeamWorking

DraftReview

IAQG

Comments/Design Spec

91002nd Ballot

Draft

9100 Publish

9110, 9120, 9115, 9137

Series RevisionsRequired for publication

9101 Audit – RevisionRequired for publication

Preparing

Training - OPMT Development

Auditor training & TransitionRecommended Schedule to satisfy need date

Required for publication


Nagoya10/2012

Moscow05/2013

Montreal10/2013

San Antonio05/2012

9100 SWG/Council

Project Approval

IAQG9100

BallotDraft

Brussels04/2014

Long Beach10/2014

2014

Chengdu04/2015

TBD10/2015

2015

TBD04/2016

TBD10/22016

20162012 2013

TBD04/2017

TBD10/2017

2017


Comments

IAQG 9100Coordination

Draft for Comment

9100 Team Comments/ Structure Analysis

9100 TeamWorking

DraftReview

9100 Revision Schedule

ISO 9001FDIS

ISO 9001 Publication

ISO 9001 CD/ IAQG Review & Comment

ISO 9001 DIS/

9100 Team Review & Comment

IAQG

Comments- Design Spec

9100BallotDraft


Comments

Opportunities for input

Not complete

Complete

IAQG

Stakeholder Feedback


9100 Series ScheduleTask Who Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

IAQG Meetings Montreal BrussellsLong

BeachChengdu TBD TBD TBD

ISO 9001:2015 Schedule ISO 9001 DIS May FDIS Feb Pub Sept9100 Series Milestones 9100 Team SD WD CD Ballot PublishProject Approval (103 form) Leader

Develop Team Selection Criteria Leader

Establish IAQG Team Leader

Develop Design Specification Scribe

Operating Procedure Updates Jim C

Sector Teams meet to review Design Specification

9100 Sectors

Stakeholder Identification 9100 Team

Determine methods to request feedback

9100 Team

Request stakeholder feedback Leader

Review clarifications issued for 9100:2009

Buddy C

Collect Stakeholders Feedback Scribe

Develop Structure Draft with ISO 9001 CD text

Scribe

Review Structure Draft 9100 Team

Review and Disposition Stakeholder Feedback

9100 Team

Writing Team evaluates ISO 9001 DIS and provides input to TAG

Writing Team

Prepare a Working Draft outline Scribe

Writing Team develops a Working Draft with ISO 9001 DIS

Writing Team

Feedback - 9100 Sector Team Comments to Working Draft

9100 Sectors

Disposition - 9100 Sector Team Comments to Working Draft

9100 Team

Writing Team develops a Coordination Draft

Writing Team

Determine change impacts to 9101, 9104, 9102, 9103

Req's Team

Feedback - IAQG Comments to Coordination Draft

9100 Team

Disposition IAQG Comments to Coordination Draft

9100 Team

Incorporate ISO 9001 Changes - FDIS

Scribe

IAQG 9100:2016 ballot IAQG

Review and disposition IAQG 9100:2016 ballot comments

9100 Team

Coordination with SCMH 9100 Team

Determine Certification Scheme impacts and changes needed

OPMT

Transition Training OPMT

Deployment Support Materials9100

Sectors

20162013 2014 2015

9100 Revision Schedule

28IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.Copyright © 2013 IAQG. All rights reserved.


Next Steps – 2014

29

9100 Team to review and comment to ISO 9001 DIS

Integrate ISO 9001 DIS with 9100 requirements and accepted proposals into a rough draft for the 9100 Team review

Begin work on the 9110 Maintenance and 9115 Software standards

Launch 9120 in the fall IAQG meeting


Questions?

30

Date post:	21-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	eunice-nelson
View:	219 times
Download:	2 times

IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group. Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights...

Documents