Date post: | 20-Mar-2017 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | david-spurway |
View: | 268 times |
Download: | 33 times |
© IBM Corporation, 2016
IBM Power Systems Introduction 16th February 2017
Presented by David SpurwayIBM Power Systems Product ManagerIBM Systems, UK and Ireland
2 © IBM Corporation, 2016
LEGO Bricks
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
3 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Have you ever seen one like this?
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
4 © IBM Corporation, 2016
They even managed to do this…
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
5 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Science behind LEGO
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
6 © IBM Corporation, 2016
LEGO provides the building blocks
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
7 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Why are Power and LEGO similar?
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
8 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
9 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
50+ Years50+ Years
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
10 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
Constant focus to remain current$1B Invest for Linux$2.4B Invest for POWER8$3B Invest for Future
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
11 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 Traditional UNIX
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
12 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
~18 per million elementsrejected
130x more checkers in POWER processors
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
13 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
14 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
19 Billion elements per yearCommon Platform
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
15 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common PlatformCompetition from LEGO “clones”Competition from Intel
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
16 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Manufacturing Cost
Reliability Security
R&DMarket Leadership
Heritage
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
50+ Years 50+ Years
Constant focus to remain current $1billion
~$4.3B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Competition from LEGO “clones” Competition from Intel
LEGO underpins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
17 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What “bricks” do LEGO use?
IBM AIX, IBM PowerHA, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, IBM Tivoli Netcool/Webtop,IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus Probe, IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager,
IBM Tivoli Monitoring, IBM Tivoli Enterprise Console, IBM Tivoli Network Manager,IBM Tivoli Performance Analyzer, IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller,
IBM TotalStorage Productivity Center, IBM Power 570,IBM BladeCenter HS22 blade servers, IBM Power 770, IBM System x3650 servers,
IBM System Storage DS4800, IBM System Storage DS8700, IBM Tape Library
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=PM&subtype=AB&htmlfid=SPC03262DKEN
LEGO creates model business success with SAP and IBM
18 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What “bricks” do LEGO use?
“Due to the architecture and design of the cloud-based LEGO Matrix, IT is not a bottleneck on growth.”— Esben Viskum, Senior Director, LEGO Service Center
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=PM&subtype=AB&htmlfid=SPC03262DKEN
19 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Let’s talk bricks…
20 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Would you like to go fast?
21 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Go faster – win your race
22 © IBM Corporation, 2016
23 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 is the fastest around
24 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What would “faster” mean to you?
25 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 Overview
Optimized for Data
Open Innovation Platform
Superior CloudEconomics
26 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Power S814 Power S824
Power S822
Power S812L
Power S822L
Scale-out Systems (1 & 2 sockets)
IBM
Pow
er S
yste
ms
Enterprise Systems (4+ sockets)
Power E880CPower E870CPower E850C
Power S824L
Power Systems Range
Operating Systems
or
Hypervisors Management
27 © IBM Corporation, 2016
IBM Power Systems with Oracle DBs
£0.00
£10,000,000.00
£20,000,000.00
£30,000,000.00
£40,000,000.00
£50,000,000.00
£60,000,000.00
£70,000,000.00
£80,000,000.00
£90,000,000.00
HPE ProLiantDL380 Gen9
(2ch/36co XeonE5-2699 v3
2.3GHz)
HPE ProLiantDL580 Gen9
(4ch/72co XeonE7-8880 v32.30GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S812LC
(1ch/10coPOWER82.92GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S822LC
(2ch/20coPOWER82.92GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S824
(4ch/24coPOWER83.52GHz)
IBM PowerSystem E850
(8ch/48coPOWER83.02GHz)
IBM PowerSystem E870
(8ch/80coPOWER84.19GHz)
Cost Comparison 3 Year DG MaintOracle DG Lic Costs3 Year Tuning Pack MaintOracle Tuning Pack Lic Costs3 Year Diag Pack MaintOracle Diag Pack Lic Costs3 Year Partitioning MaintOracle Partitioning Lic Costs3 Year RAC MaintOracle RAC Lic Costs3 Year Oracle MaintOracle DB Lic CostsPeople Costs (3yr)SAN Port CostsLAN Port CostsPower Costs (3yr 24x7)Rack Costs (3yr)Hardware Maint (3yr 24x7)System Purchase
28 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Linux on Power: Lower Hardware Costs
• PowerVM Linux Edition– 1 year 24x7 SWMA
• Integrated Facility for Linux– Linux only
4 CoreActivations
32 GBMemory
+ +
Lower CostSupport
29 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Linux on Power: Lower IBM Software Costs
• 70 Processor Value Units
• Same as 2-socket servers
• Enterprise Power advantage
PowerVM
Linux Linux Linux
Power Hardware
30 © IBM Corporation, 2016
IBM Power Systems with WAS/ND
£0.00
£500,000.00
£1,000,000.00
£1,500,000.00
£2,000,000.00
£2,500,000.00
£3,000,000.00
£3,500,000.00
£4,000,000.00
£4,500,000.00
£5,000,000.00
HPE ProLiantDL380 Gen9(2ch/36co
Xeon E5-2699v3 2.3GHz)
HPE ProLiantDL580 Gen9(4ch/72co
Xeon E7-8880v3 2.30GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S812LC
(1ch/10coPOWER82.92GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S822LC
(2ch/20coPOWER82.92GHz)
IBM PowerSystem S824
(4ch/24coPOWER83.52GHz)
IBM PowerSystem E850
(8ch/48coPOWER83.02GHz)
IBM PowerSystem E870
(8ch/80coPOWER84.19GHz)
Cost Comparison
WAS/ND 3 Year Support Costs
WAS/ND License Costs
People Costs (3yr)
SAN Port Costs
LAN Port Costs
Power Costs (3yr 24x7)
Rack Costs (3yr)
Hardware Maint (3yr 24x7)
System Purchase
31 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Open Source for IBM i
• Option 1 – Node.JS 2.x
• Option 2 - Python 3.4
• Option 3 – GCC / chroot
• Option 4 – Python 2.7
• Option 5 – Node.JS 4.x
• Option 6 – Git
• Option 7 – Tools
• Option 8 – Orion
• Option 9 – cloud-init
• Option 10 – Node.JS 6.x31
New
32 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Do you believe that POWER8 is best for you?
33 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Need a refresher in Computer Science?
34 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Getting answers from your data
• To work with your data today, you need to get the data to the processor core–Get data from disk–From disk to adapter–From adapter to memory–From memory to cache
35 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Getting answers from your data
• To work with your data today, you need to get the data to the processor core–Get data from disk–From disk to adapter–From adapter to memory–From memory to cache–From cache to processor core
36 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Getting answers from your data
• To work with your data today, you need to get the data to the processor core–Get data from disk–From disk to adapter–From adapter to memory–From memory to cache–From cache to processor core–Get your answer!
Still gobbledegook?
37 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Your not a computer scientist?
38 © IBM Corporation, 2016
You don’t need to be.
39 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What would “faster” mean to you?
40 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Taking the kids to school
41 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Fast processors = new knowledge fast
42 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 vs. Intel Performance
Benchmark x86 E5 HaswellBest
Results POWER8Best
Results
PerCore Ratio
SAP SD 2-Tier ERP 6 Dell PowerEdge R730E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 16,500 IBM E870
80 Core 79,750 2.2 X
SPECjbb2013 Lenovo Flex x240E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 245,178 IBM E870
80 Core 1,299,150 2.4 X
SPECint_rate2006 Dell PowerEdge T620E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 1,400 IBM S824
24 Core 1,750 1.9 X
SPECfp_rate2006 Dell PowerEdge T620E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 942 IBM S824
24 Core 1,370 2.2 X
Oracle e-BS 12.1.3Extra Large Payroll
Cisco UCS C240 M4E5-2697 v3, 28 Core 1,125,281 IBM S824
12 Core 1,090,909 2.3 X
IBM Power E870 on the two-tier SAP SD standard application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 5 for the SAP ERP 6.0 application; 8 processors / 80 cores / 640 threads, POWER8; 4.19GHz, 2048 GB memory, 79,750 SD benchmark users, running AIX® 7.1 and DB2® 10.5, dialog response: 0.97 seconds, order line items/hour: 8,722,000, dialog steps/hour: 26,166,000, SAPS: 436,100, Database response time (dialog/update): 0.013 sec / 0.026 sec, CPU utilization: 99%, Cert #2014034. Result valid as of October 3, 2014. Source: http://www.sap.com/benchmark. Dell PowerEdge R730, on the two-tier SAP SD standard application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 5 for the SAP ERP 6.0 application; 2 processors/36 cores/72 threads, Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699v3; 2.30 GHz, 256 GB memory; 16,500 SD benchmark users, running RHEL 7 and SAP ASE 16; Certification # 2014033.
SPECjbb2013 results are submitted as of 12/01/2014. For more information go to http://www.specbench.org/jbb2013/results
SPECcpu2006 results are submitted as of 9/8/2014. For more information go to http://www.specbench.org/cpu2006/results/ All results use Oracle eBS 12.1.3 Payroll Batch Extra Large Kit and are current as of 1/24/2015. For more information go to http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html
PerCore Ratio
2 X or better
43 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 vs. Intel Performance
Benchmark x86 E5 HaswellBest
Results POWER8Best
Results
PerCore Ratio
SAP SD 2-Tier ERP 6 Dell PowerEdge R730E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 16,500 IBM E870
80 Core 79,750 2.2 X
SPECjbb2013 Lenovo Flex x240E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 245,178 IBM E870
80 Core 1,299,150 2.4 X
SPECint_rate2006 Dell PowerEdge T620E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 1,400 IBM S824
24 Core 1,750 1.9 X
SPECfp_rate2006 Dell PowerEdge T620E5-2699 v3, 36 Core 942 IBM S824
24 Core 1,370 2.2 X
Oracle e-BS 12.1.3Extra Large Payroll
Cisco UCS C240 M4E5-2697 v3, 28 Core 1,125,281 IBM S824
12 Core 1,090,909 2.3 X
IBM Power E870 on the two-tier SAP SD standard application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 5 for the SAP ERP 6.0 application; 8 processors / 80 cores / 640 threads, POWER8; 4.19GHz, 2048 GB memory, 79,750 SD benchmark users, running AIX® 7.1 and DB2® 10.5, dialog response: 0.97 seconds, order line items/hour: 8,722,000, dialog steps/hour: 26,166,000, SAPS: 436,100, Database response time (dialog/update): 0.013 sec / 0.026 sec, CPU utilization: 99%, Cert #2014034. Result valid as of October 3, 2014. Source: http://www.sap.com/benchmark. Dell PowerEdge R730, on the two-tier SAP SD standard application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 5 for the SAP ERP 6.0 application; 2 processors/36 cores/72 threads, Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699v3; 2.30 GHz, 256 GB memory; 16,500 SD benchmark users, running RHEL 7 and SAP ASE 16; Certification # 2014033.
SPECjbb2013 results are submitted as of 12/01/2014. For more information go to http://www.specbench.org/jbb2013/results
SPECcpu2006 results are submitted as of 9/8/2014. For more information go to http://www.specbench.org/cpu2006/results/ All results use Oracle eBS 12.1.3 Payroll Batch Extra Large Kit and are current as of 1/24/2015. For more information go to http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html
44 © IBM Corporation, 2016
SMT = Hermione’s Time-TurnerAttend multiple lessons at once and learn more!
45 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 and AIX Demonstrate SMT Throughput Improvement Compared to Intel
IBM Confidential
46 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Do you have enough to do?
47 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Is the car park big enough?Cache = school car park
48 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Core
Cache
Memory
Memory is slow relative tocache
1-100clock cycles
400-800clock cycles
1clock cycle
Cache is Critical to Good Performance
49 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Chip Cache and Core Speed
2S=2 Socket, 4S=4 Socket, 8S=8 Socket, DCM=Dual Chip Module, SCM=Single Chip Module, Low Power Models Not Included
Chip FamilyCore
Frequency(GHz)
L1 plus L2 Cache per Core (KB)
Approximate Cache per Core
(MB)
Intel 26xx-V4 (2S, 8+ Cores) 1.7 – 3.2 320 2.81 – 3.44
Intel 46xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 1.8 – 2.6 320 2.81 – 4.06
Intel 48xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 2.0 – 2.1 320 2.81
Intel 88xx-V4 (8S, 8+ Cores) 2.1 – 2.8 320 2.81 – 6.31
POWER8 (DCM, 8+ Cores) 3.02 – 4.15 608 19.27
POWER8 (SCM, 8+ Cores) 4.02 – 4.35 608 19.27
IBM z13 5.0 4,320 32.22
Note: Only 3 of the 42 Intel chips included on this chart have greater than 2.81 MB of cache per core. Only 3 of the chips included have clock frequencies >= 3 GHz
Chip FamilyCore
Frequency(GHz)
L1 plus L2 Cache per Core (KB)
Approximate Cache per Core
(MB)
Intel 26xx-V4 (2S, 8+ Cores) 1.7 – 3.2 320 2.81 – 3.44
Intel 46xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 1.8 – 2.6 320 2.81 – 4.06
Intel 48xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 2.0 – 2.1 320 2.81
Intel 88xx-V4 (8S, 8+ Cores) 2.1 – 2.8 320 2.81 – 6.31
POWER8 is… Faster Bigger Much Bigger!
POWER8 (DCM, 8+ Cores) 3.02 – 4.15 608 19.27
POWER8 (SCM, 8+ Cores) 4.02 – 4.35 608 19.27
50 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Larger memory bandwidth means less waiting
POWER8 Memory Bandwidth per Socket
GB/Sec
IBM Confidential
52 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Chip Bandwidth and Threading
2S=2 Socket, 4S=4 Socket, 8S=8 Socket, DCM=Dual Chip Module, SCM=Single Chip Module, Low Power Models Not Included, Updated 6/1/2015
Chip Family
MemoryBandwidthper Socket
Peak I/OBandwidthper Socket
Threadsper Core
Intel 26xx-V4 (2S, 8+ Cores) 60 – 77 GB/s 80 GB/s 1, 2
Intel 46xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 68 GB/s 80 GB/s 1, 2
Intel 48xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 102 GB/s 64 GB/s 1,2
Intel 88xx-V4 (8S, 8+ Cores) 102 GB/s 64 GB/s 1, 2
POWER8 (DCM, 8+ Cores) 192 GB/s 96 GB/s 1, 2, 4, 8
POWER8 (SCM, 8+ Cores) 230 GB/s 64 GB/s 1, 2, 4, 8
Chip Family
MemoryBandwidthper Socket
Peak I/OBandwidthper Socket
Threadsper Core
Intel 26xx-V4 (2S, 8+ Cores) 60 – 77 GB/s 80 GB/s 1, 2
Intel 46xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 68 GB/s 80 GB/s 1, 2
Intel 48xx-V4 (4S, 8+ Cores) 102 GB/s 64 GB/s 1,2
Intel 88xx-V4 (8S, 8+ Cores) 102 GB/s 64 GB/s 1, 2
POWER8 is… Much faster! About the same Does much more!
POWER8 (DCM, 8+ Cores) 192 GB/s 96 GB/s 1, 2, 4, 8
POWER8 (SCM, 8+ Cores) 230 GB/s 64 GB/s 1, 2, 4, 8
53 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Enterprise System PoolsGrow your brains and move them around
54 © IBM Corporation, 2016
• Planned maintenance
• Rebalance capacity
• Failover clusters
• Server migration
Power Enterprise Pools Lower Costs
Before After
A B C A B C
© IBM Corporation, 2016
Marketing
Scale-Up or Scale-Out
Scale-Up Scale-Out
57 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What is Power8?
http://www.power8.com/Home.aspx
58 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What is POWER8?
POWERx – All uppercase, with number, no space – processor generationPower – Uppercase “P”, rest lower case, no number, servers, based on POWER processors
59 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 Overview
Optimized for Data
Open Innovation Platform
Superior CloudEconomics
60 © IBM Corporation, 2016
OpenPOWER drives industry innovation
The OpenPOWER Foundation creates an open ecosystem, using the POWER Architecture to share expertise, investment, and
server-class intellectual property to serve the evolving needs of customers.
Performance of leading POWER architecture Broadens the capability and performance of the POWER platform
Collaboration across multiple thought leadersCollaborative development model drives collective thought leadership, simultaneously across multiple disciplines
Open DevelopmentOpenPOWER enables greater innovation through both open software and open hardware
61 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Hadoop / Spark Commercial Technical
OpenPOWER Linux Cluster (LC) Systems (existing)
S812LC1 socket, 2U, Linux
8 or 10 coresUp to 1 TB memory
Up to 112 TB Storage4 Available PCI Slots
KVM / Bare Metal
S822LC – GCA2 socket, 2U, Linux
16 or 20 coresUp to 1 TB memory
2 Disks5 Available PCI slots
KVM / Bare Metal
S822LC – GTA2 socket, 2U, Linux
16 or 20 coresUp to 1 TB memory
2 Disks2 NVIDIA K80 GPUs3 Available PCI Slots
Bare Metal
62 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Spark Internal Benchmarks Price Performance
Power S812LC HP DL380 Gen9 (Haswell)
Configuration
10 cores / 80 threads,POWER8; 2.9GHz,
256 GB memory, Ubuntu 15.04, Spark 1.4, OpenJDK 1.8
24 cores / 48 threads, E5-2690 v3; 2.6GHz ,
256 GB memory. Ubuntu 15.04, Spark 1.4, OpenJDK 1.8
Web Price ($US) $12,999 $16,004
Relative Results 1,940 1,000
• All results are based on IBM Internal Testing of 10 SparkBench benchmarks consisting of SQL RDD Relation, Twitter, Pageview Streaming, PageRank, Logistic Regression, SVD++, TriangleCount, SVM, MF, SQL Hive• IBM Power System S812LC 10 cores / 80 threads, 1 X POWER8; 2.9GHz, 256 GB memory, Ubuntu 15.04, Spark 1.4, OpenJDK 1.8• Intel Xeon HP DL380; 24 cores / 48 threads, 2 X E5-2690 v3; 2.6GHz , 256 GB memory. Ubuntu 15.04, Spark 1.4, OpenJDK 1.8• * Pricing is based on web prices for S812LC (http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/s812lc/buy.html ) and HP DL380 (
http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstoreHPE/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLineId=431&FamilyId=3852&BaseId=45441&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID = )• 2 x 1TB SATA 7.2K rpm LFF HDD, 10 Gb two port, 2 x 16gbps FCA
Price Performance $6.70 (2.3X Better) $16.00
63 © IBM Corporation, 2016
PostgreSQL Benchmark Price Performance
Power S822LC HP DL380 Gen9
Configuration
16 cores / 128 threads, POWER8; 3.6GHz,
256 GB memory, PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha2, RHEL 7.1,
PowerKVM
36 cores / 72 threads; Intel E5-2699 v3; 2.3 GHz;
256 GB memory, PostgreSQL 9.5 Aplha2, RHEL 7.1, RHEV
Web Price ($US) $20,872 $29,123
Relative Results 1,250 1,000
Price Performance $16.70 (1.74X Better) $29.12
• Results are based on IBM internal testing of single system running multiple virtual machines with pgbench select only work load and are current as of October 5, 2015. Performance figures are based on running a 300 scale factor. Individual results will vary depending on individual workloads, configurations and conditions.
• IBM Power System S822LC; 16 cores / 128 threads, POWER8; 3 .6GHz, 256 GB memory, PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha2, RHEL 7.1, PowerKVM • Competitive stack: HP Proliant DL380 Gen9; 36 cores / 72 threads; Intel E5-2699 v3; 2.3 GHz; 256 GB memory, PostgreSQL 9.5 Aplha2 , RHEL 7.1, RHEV • Transactions per $ graph compares virtual machine at comparable per VM transactions per second using S822LC running 8 vcpu (1 core equiv.) and DL380 GEN9 ran 4 vcpu (2 core equiv.) VM configurations. S822LC produced 26, 781
average TPS per VM @ 20 VMs; DL380 produced 26,793 average TPS per VM @ 16 VMs.• Pricing is based on web pricing for S822LC http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/s822lc-commercial/buy.html and HP DL380
http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstoreHPE/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLineId=431&FamilyId=3852&BaseId=45450&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID
64 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Dense Virtualisation Big Data Technical
OpenPOWER Linux Cluster (LC) Systems (new)
S821LCUp to 2 socket, 1U, Linux
8, 10, 16 or 20 coresUp to 512 GB memoryUp to 38 TB Storage1 NVIDIA K80 GPU
4 Available PCI Slots
S822LC for Big DataUp to 2 socket, 2U, Linux
8, 10, 16 or 20 coresUp to 512 GB memoryUp to 96 TB Storage2 NVIDIA K80 GPUs5 Available PCI slots
S822LC for HPC2 socket, 2U, Linux
NVLink16 or 20 cores
Up to 1 TB memory2 Disks
2 or 4 NVIDIA P100 GPUs3 Available PCI Slots
65 © IBM Corporation, 2016
OpenPOWER Linux Cluster (LC) Systems
S821LCMTM: 8001-12C
Code Name: Stratton
S822LC for Big DataMTM: 8001-22C
Code Name: Briggs
S822LC for HPCMTM: 8335-GTB
Code Name: Minsky (was Garrison)
Power S812LCMTM: 8348-21C
Code Name: Habanero
Power S822LCMTM: 8335-GCA
Code Name: Firestone
Power S822LCMTM: 8335-GTA
Code Name: Firestone
66 © IBM Corporation, 2016
OpenPOWER Open Interfaces
OpenPOWER open interfaces enable an unbeatable innovation pace
CAPI
NVLink40 GB/s
CAPI16 GB/s
POWER8Memory Interface Control
ServerClass
Memory
DMI
IBM andPartner Devices
GPU
67 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Workload Accelerators and Power
Field ProgrammableGate Array
GraphicsProcessingUnit
DescriptionReconfigurable hardware
Task customized, low latency, low power
1000s of simple cores
High bandwidth, floating point, and parallelism
ExampleUse Cases
Compression, encryption, high speed streaming, search, Monte Carlo simulations
Deep neural networks, speech recognition, chemistry, simulations, JAVA, Hadoop, graphics
Power ChipIntegration
Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface (CAPI) NVIDIA NVLink
*All statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only.
68 © IBM Corporation, 2016
GPUs are like minions
The individual cores in a GPU are not very powerful
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/
But gather loads together, and remarkable things can happen!
69 © IBM Corporation, 2016
The Mythbusters explain GPUs – click image below!
70 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Power Systems and NVIDIA GPU Roadmap
NVIDIA GPU NVIDIA GPU with NVLink
2015
Power Chip Power Chipwith NVLink*
2016*
*All statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only.
80 GB/sPeak*
PCIe x1632 GB/s
71 © IBM Corporation, 2016
FPGAs are like Wolverine…
• Really good at doing one thing
• Only does one thing, just really fast
• Unlike Wolverine, can be reprogrammed to change what it does–This takes a particular set of skills,
which many of the OpenPOWER Foundation member have
• Can work alongside more general computational elements, and maybe other FPGAs–Like the X-Men!
72 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface
Non-CAPI
Off-ChipAccelerator
Core
Memory
PC
I
CAPI
FPGAw/CAPI
AcceleratorP8Core
Memory
PC
I
73 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What is CAPI?
FPGA
POWER8 Core
PCIe
POWER8 Processor
OS
App
Memory (Coherent)
AFU
IBM Supplied PSL
Virtual Memory
CA
PP
CAPI (Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface) is a set of IBM innovations in hardware and software that allow an application and it’s accelerated component to share the same virtual address space.
For customers, CAPI enables performance and ease of programming:
• Application to set up data coherently in shared virtual memory and call the accelerator functional unit (AFU)
• AFU to reads and writes data from and to shared virtual memory coherently across PCIe and communicating with the application
• AFU to coherently cache data in the PSL cache for quick AFU access
74 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What is OpenCL?
Host Accelerator
C/C++ API
OpenCL C
• OpenCL is an open standard programming framework enabling a programmer to code and compile a kernel for a number of architectures like CPU’s, GPU’s, FPGA’s or other processors.
• OpenCL provides an abstraction of the hardware allowing software engineers to accelerate algorithms
• OpenCL enables flexibility of acceleration approaches
• OpenCL enables selection of most effective acceleration platform for your kernel
• Allows you to leverage a vast OpenCL ecosystem for accelerated functionality
– Multiple FPGA suppliers– Multiple kernel providers
75 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What OpenCL 2.0 features exploit CAPI?• On CAPI systems, Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) can be used to share buffers between
host and FPGA rather than transferring data to and from private FPGA buffers
• Non-CAPI
• CAPI
• Existing OpenCL host programs need to be modified to use SVM buffers instead of cl_mem objects
Dataout
Datain transfer from host
Kernel execution
Dataout transfer to host
Datain
Datain in shared memory
Kernel execution
Dataout in shared memory
76 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Catalogue of CAPI Accelerators
FinancialL3 Order Book (Algo
Logic)Monte Carlo Risk
Analysis (IBM)
DatabaseIBM Data Engine for No-
SQL (“CAPI-Flash”)
Erasure code for Hadoop(IBM, Xilinx, Semptian)
SQL Accelerator (IBM Netezza)
Key Value Store (KVS) (Xilinx)
Dynamic Time Warp Pattern Match (IBM)
Bitwise Encryption (DRC / SecurityFirst)
General PurposeGZIP Compression (IBM)
Fast-Fourier Transfer (IBM)Linear Algebra (Auviz)
JPEG Manipulation (ClusterTech)
SecurityBank Fraud Detection
In-Betweenness Djikstra (DRC)
Video Surveillance (SiliconScapes)
Digital DNA for forensics (DRC)
Retail & AnalyticsRegEx Text Analytics
(IBM)Mood Detection (SiliconScapes)
Real-Time Ad Auctions (Algo-Logic)
Visually impaired assistance
(SiliconScapes)
Computer Vision& Learning
CV Library (Auviz)
People Identification
DNN Library (Auviz)
Activity Recognition (SiliconScapes)
Health CareLight Activated Cancer Therapy (U of Toronto)
Genomics Processing (Edico)
PairHMM Accelerator (IBM)
77 © IBM Corporation, 2016
CAPI related OpenPOWER members
78 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Intel taking a very different strategic direction…
79 © IBM Corporation, 2016
The last four generations of x86 architecture
80 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Single Thread Performance is Increasing
Performance measured in rperfs
+14 % +28%
POWER7 7403.7 GHz8 CoresSMT1
56
POWER7+ 7404.2 GHz8 CoresSMT1
64
POWER8 S8244.1 GHz8 CoresSMT1
82
81 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Google, Rackspace, and GPUs: OH MY! See what you missed at OpenPOWER Summit
http://openpowerfoundation.org/blogs/google-rackspace-gpus-openpower-summit/
82 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Accelerators Will Be Enhanced in POWER9POWER9
Core On-ChipAccelerators
Cache Hierarchy and On-Chip Interconnect
I/O CAPIMemory SMPAccelNVPCIe Gen4DDR4 16 Gb/s25 Gb/s
Memory PCIeDevice
IBM &PartnerDevice
NVIDIAGPU
IBM &PartnerDevice
POWER9Chips
DD
R
PC
Ie
CA
PI 2
NVLink 2
Accel
SM
P
Source: http://openpowerfoundation.org/presentations/brad-mccredie-board-advisor-ibm/
83 © IBM Corporation, 2016http://www.nextplatform.com/2016/08/24/big-blue-aims-sky-power9/
84 © IBM Corporation, 2016
POWER8 Announcement
Optimized for Data
Open Innovation Platform
Superior CloudEconomics
© IBM Corporation, 2016
Need for change
86 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Power Systems Scalability and Value Growth
IBM p5 595(2004)
List Price £2.4M38 Processor CoresPer Ratio (Gartner)
= 1.00~22,710 watts maxWeight ~1,310 kg
=IBM Power S822
(2014)
List Price £42.5k12 Processor CoresPer Ratio (Gartner)
= 1.17~1,524 watts maxWeight ~28.6 kg
87 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Power Systems Scalability and Value Growth
IBM p5 595(2004)
List Price £2.4M38 Processor CoresPer Ratio (Gartner)
= 1.00~22,710 watts maxWeight ~1,310 kg
=IBM Power
S821LC(2016)
List Price £7.7k20 Processor CoresPer Ratio (Gartner)
= 1.00~703 watts maxWeight ~19 kg
88 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Off-premise
On-premise
VPN
Sec
urity
Ser
vice
s
Sec
urity
Ser
vice
s
Container
Systems of Record Systems of EngagementBluemix
AIXRHEL
IBM i
IBM Systems Hybrid Cloud Reference Architecture
© IBM Corporation, 2016
Systems of…
90 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Traditional IBM Power Systems – Systems Of Record
91 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Other data sources, some in the Cloud
92 © IBM Corporation, 2016
New and imminent announcements
• 9 Sept 2016 Three new LC servers–S821LC (1U), S822LC for Big Data, & S822LC for High Performance Computing
• 19 Sept 2016 Power Enterprise Cloud - E870C & E880C
• 11 Oct 2016 –Power Enterprise Cloud – E850C–DDR4 memory–Multiple I/O announcements
Organizations struggle with key technology challenges supporting insights, change, and speed
Understanding Data
Digital intelligence is a primary competitive advantage
Yet 88% of all data today is unstructured and invisible to computers1
“The next wave will be all about connecting dots and correlating data to produce actionable insights.” –CIO, Retail, United States2
Keeping Pace
Superior technology delivers superior performance
Yet the pace of innovation (72%) is now the top CEO challenge, even greater than security (66%)3
“Disruptive technologies could change the fundamentals of our business” –Kazuo Hirai, CEO, Sony Corporation, Japan4
Accelerating Time-to-Market
Sustainable success is now measured in days, not weeks
Outperforming CxOs are 95% more likely to focus on being first to market4
“We’ve been charged with speeding up time-to-market, both for the products we sell and for our own internal tools.”⎯Kalev Reiljan, CIO, TeliaSonera, Finland2
Source: 1) IBM ResearchSource: 2) IBM Institute for Business Value, Redefining Connections, Insights from the Global C-suite Study – The CIO PerspectiveSource: 3) Fortune, Myth-busting the Fortune 500, 2015Source: 4) IBM Institute for Business Value, Redefining Boundaries: Insights from the Global C-Suite Study, 2015
IBM Systems | 93
Expose systems as
APIs to enable composable
services
IBM Systems | 94
Architects of the future require IT infrastructure that can do more than ‘just work’Servers and storage are no longer inanimate.
They can understand, reason, and learn.
Today, they can think.
Outthink status quo.Think IT infrastructure for thecognitive era.
Detect anomalies to proactively
resolve issues
Move data to right location
based on usage
patterns
Deliver real-time insights
from oceans of data
95 © IBM Corporation, 2016
What is cognitive computing?
Cognitive computing solutions offer various capabilities, including…
• Learning and building knowledge from various structured and unstructured sources of information
• Understanding natural language and interacting more naturally with humans
• Capturing the expertise of top performers and accelerating the development of expertise in others
• Enhancing the cognitive processes of professionals to help improve decision making
• Elevating the quality and consistency of decision making across an organization.
96 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Engage with your customers
• Acts as a tireless agent providing expert assistance to human users
• Makes the conversation in natural means, such as human language
• Understands consumers from past history and brings context and evidence-based reasoning to the interaction.
97 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Fighting the security questions
A Call Center Storyhttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-security-questions-banking-story-david-spurway
98 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Banking industry - Thought leadership from the IBM Institute of Business Value
Breakthrough bankingYour cognitive future in banking and financial markets
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=XB&infotype=PM&htmlfid=GBE03713USEN&attachment=GBE03713USEN.PDF
99 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Some existing challenges
100 © IBM Corporation, 2016
But what does this have to do with IBM Systems?
• Details of customers (such as past history), is contained on IBM Systems–IBM Power–System z
• New solutions will combine existing Systems of Record with new solution elements in the Cloud
• An example of Hybrid Cloud
101 © IBM Corporation, 2016
A surprise trip to Lisbon
An Insurance Storyhttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surprise-trip-lisbon-insurance-story-david-spurway
102 © IBM Corporation, 2016
I find myself in Lisbon…
• My Parents-In-Law set off on a cruise, but Mother-In-Law is taken ill
• Hospitalised in Lisbon
• Insurance company take 12 days to validate cover
• Father-In-Law is the real concern
• Twitter storm
103 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Insurance industry - Capturing hearts, minds and market share
How connected insurers are improving customer retention
http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/insuranceretention/
104 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Insurance is a product based on trust, for which perception matters.
105 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Mix in some Bluemix and Watson…
106 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Unstructured Facebook entries in, Geo Political Entities out!
http://ibmlaser.mybluemix.net/siredemo.html
107 © IBM Corporation, 2016
Who & Where: Find out with Bluemix Geospatial Analytics
https://developer.ibm.com/bluemix/2014/12/17/find-bluemix-geospatial-analytics/
108 © IBM Corporation, 2016
But what does this have to do with IBM Power?
• Details of customers are on IBM Power Systems–Customer Details–Declared Medical History
• Location, Sentiment, etc. are on Social Media
• Other data could be available through B2B APIs
• Hybrid Cloud solution could differentiate from competition
109 © IBM Corporation, 2016
IBM Power Systems Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure
On-Premises Cloud Hybrid Infrastructure
Complementary Built-in Cloud Deployment Service Options
Transform traditional infrastructure with automation, self-service and elastic consumption models
Securely extend to Public Cloud with rapid access to compute services and API integration
• OpenStack-based Cloud Management: enabling DevOps to Full production
• Open source automation (installation and config. recipes)
• Flexible elastic private cloud capacity and consumption models
• Cross Data Center Inventory and Performance Monitoring via the IBM Cloud
• Manage VMs across on and off-premises clouds with a single pane of glass (e.g., VMware vRealize)
• Securely connect traditional workloads with cloud-native apps (Power & API Connect, BlueMix)
• Optional DR as a Service (GDR for Power)• Free access and capacity flexibility with SoftLayer
- Free SoftLayer starter pack (12 server months)- Flexibility to run capacity On Premises or in SoftLayer
•Design for Cloud Provisioning and Automation •Build for Infrastructure as a Service•Build for Cloud Capacity Pools across Data Centers
•Design for Hybrid Cloud with BlueMix•Deliver with automation for DevOps •Deliver with Database as a Service
© IBM Corporation, 2016
Questions?David Spurway – IBM Power Systems Product ManagerEmail: [email protected]: 07717 892 896Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube
111 © IBM Corporation, 2016
How IBM Power Systems are like Batman
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-ibm-power-systems-like-batman-david-spurway?articleId=8112406449121429124
112 © IBM Corporation, 2016
© IBM Corporation, 2016
Thank you!David Spurway – IBM Power Systems Product ManagerEmail: [email protected]: 07717 892 896Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube