+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ICANN 51 Business Digest

ICANN 51 Business Digest

Date post: 14-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: icann
View: 696 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
ICANN 51 Los Angeles Business Digest
Transcript

ICANN 51

Los Angeles

Business Digest

Why a Business Digest?

This Digest is designed to serve as a non-exhaustive review of highlights of the Internet

Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Public Meeting relevant to a variety

of businesses stakeholders affected by ICANN’s work, presented in business friendly

language. Please provide feedback and comments to the ICANN business engagement team

at [email protected].

In order to keep interested businesses informed about ICANN’s work, Internet governance

and the business world’s participation, this Business Digest is complemented by two online

spaces meant to inform and exchange ideas on an ongoing basis with interested business

leaders: the Twitter feed @ICANN4biz and the LinkedIn group ICANN for Business. Feel free

to join, participate, debate, engage, and provide feedback.

Executive Summary

The ICANN 51 public meeting took place in Los Angeles, California on 12-16 October 2014.

The meeting was notable for its size, with 2,857 online registrations and 2,282 on-site

participants.

The Los Angeles location also helped bolster private sector participation, with over 600

business people registered online – as many as attended the biggest ICANN meeting to date

in London earlier in 2014.

Increased attendance at ICANN meetings is due to an array of factors. One factor is content:

ongoing ICANN community work on the transition of the stewardship of the IANA functions -

the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority that ICANN coordinates – and on the enhancement

of ICANN Accountability, represent major developments in which stakeholders can

participate. In addition, the business engagement team worked closely with ICANN regional

engagement teams and regional representatives of the Commercial Stakeholder Group

(CSG) constituencies to conduct strategic outreach and preparation for the meeting. You can

listen to the pre-ICANN 51 webinar for business newcomers, designed to explain what

happens at an ICANN meeting and the role of business sector constituencies, here.

Key takeaways from the meeting:

As with the past few ICANN meetings, much of the discussion centered on the IANA

stewardship transition process and the enhancement of ICANN’s accountability.

The Global Domain Division hosted a number of sessions to hear feedback on the first

round of the New generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program, as it is set to conclude

in 2017 according to the Program’s reviews and assessments draft work plan posted

on 22 September 2014.

The ICANN Contractual Compliance department continues to evolve and grow in

order to adapt to the global expansion of the domain name space and awareness of

ICANN as an organization.

The participation of private sector is increasingly diverse, in terms of number of

industries represented, geography, and modes of participation. An increased number

of business associations and Tech Day participants are two examples of this growth.

Acronyms

BRG – Brand Registry Group

CBUC – Commercial and Business Users Constituency

DNA – The Domain Name Association

ccTLD – Country code Top Level Domain name

CSG – Commercial Stakeholder Group

DNS – Domain Name System

DNSSEC – Domain Name System Security Extensions

GAC – Governmental Advisory Committee

GDD – Global Domain Division

GNSO- Generic Names Supporting Organization

gTLD – Generic Top-Level Domain name

IANA – Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

IDN – Internationalized Domain Name

IPC – Intellectual Property Constituency

ISPCP – Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers Constituency

ITU – International Telecommunications Union

NGPC – New gTLD Program Committee

NTIA – National Telecommunications and Information Administration

RPMs – Rights Protection Mechanisms

RSSAC – Root Server System Advisory Committee

SSAC – Security and Stability Advisory Committee

TMCH – Trademark Clearinghouse

URS – Uniform Rapid Suspension

For more help with Acronyms in this report, please see the ICANN Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Acronym Helper.

1

Local Beginnings: Spotlight on Los Angeles Although Los Angeles is most commonly associated with the entertainment industry, the

local economy is exceptionally diversified, with established industry clusters ranging from

aerospace, fashion, and biomedical services to consumer products and tourism.

According to data from the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce

Development, LA County is the largest manufacturing center in the United States and has a

larger GDP than Belgium, Saudi Arabia, Norway and Taiwan. Los Angeles is also the largest

seaport in the Western Hemisphere and a leader in a wide variety of innovative and creative

industries.

According to a 2012 report produced by Startup Genome and Telefónica Digital, Los

Angeles is the 3rd Startup Ecosystem in the world, following Silicon Valley and Tel

Aviv.

July 2014 data from AngelList shows that Southern California is the 3rd largest Tech

Ecosystem in the United States after Silicon Valley and New York but also the fastest

growing with a 5.3% month-to-month growth.

Data released in this report by the LA Economic Development Council shows that

high-tech work contributes $108.3 billion dollars to the regional GDP.

According to a TechCrunch report, 2013 alone attracted $1.5 billion in venture capital

for LA’s technology startups — and 2014 is set to shatter that figure. Over the past

four years, financing for LA tech companies has grown at a 30% compounded annual

growth rate (CAGR), which is nearly four times greater than the U.S. average (at 7 %).

Welcome Ceremony and President’s Opening Session Roundup

The ICANN 51 opening ceremony featured an array of speakers reflecting ICANN’s diverse

community. Speakers reaffirmed ICANN’s mission and accountability during the IANA

stewardship transition.

ICANN Board Chair Steve Crocker opened the ceremony by noting several achievements

made since the previous meeting. These included the success of gTLD auctions as a last

resort, the completion of the ICANN Academy Leadership Training Program, the work of the

Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), and the progress being made towards

development of WHOIS policy.

One of the main speakers was Penny

Pritzker, the first U.S. Secretary of

Commerce to participate in an ICANN

meeting. Pritzker praised the work of

Assistant Secretary Larry Strickling,

administrator of the U.S. National

Telecommunications and Information

Administration (NTIA) while conveying

the U.S. government’s support for

ICANN by proposing to relinquish the

2

NTIA stewardship of IANA functions. Pritzker stressed the importance of the

multistakeholder model and an open Internet in light of the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference

in Korea right after ICANN 51.

The importance of innovation to global development was highlighted in two videos featuring

technological solutions to everyday problems:

ASAPNet, which provides improved

connectivity and multiple

communication tools to firefighters

and emergency response teams in

Southern California, and

thrdPlace, a platform that leverages

social technology to fuel community

initiatives by connecting individuals,

government, and businesses.

Jonathan Robinson, Chair of the GSNO, received this year’s ICANN Leadership Award for his

work in increasing collaboration between ICANN’s constituent bodies. The GNSO, which

creates policy related to gTLDs, announced that they would be conducting a review to

identify areas that need improvement and welcomed feedback from individuals.

ICANN President and CEO Fadi Chehadé’s address reviewed the progress in four strategic

areas, citing examples:

1. Affirmation of Purpose: Following the recommendations of the community, ICANN

is creating greater WHOIS accessibility to increase transparency.

2. Operational Excellence: An independent audit reported that 98% of registrars and

registries are compliant with their contractual commitments.

3. Internationalization: ICANN looks to strengthen its global community through

increased services and resources in the new Istanbul and Singapore hubs.

4. Multistakeholder model: ICANN has seen growth in its supporting organizations,

advisory committees, and observer organizations.

3

Contractual Compliance

The ICANN Contractual Compliance team includes 21 staff members spread over three hub offices (Los Angeles, Istanbul, Singapore) who offer 24-hour support in nine languages. Businesses concerned with copyright and other intellectual property issues are among those interested in the work of the compliance team.

During the Los Angeles meeting the team unveiled the Contractual Compliance Online Dashboard. This tool presents monthly data on the complaint volume, the process volume and the turnaround times for the registrars, registries and for ICANN Contractual Compliance staff.

Another announcement made at the beginning of ICANN 51 was the appointment of Allen Grogan as Chief Contract Compliance Officer. In this new position Grogan will begin building a broader compliance vision that will serve ICANN’s mission of providing public benefit, exploring ways that ICANN can work with others to help safeguard registrants and the global Internet community in ways that may go beyond pure contractual enforcement.

Learn More: Contractual Compliance operations:

Contractual Compliance on the ICANN website

Learn about the Compliance department, related programs, complaint submission

and performance measurement.

ICANN 51 Day 3: Contractual Compliance Improves Online Dashboard

Read the ICANN 51 update from the Compliance team.

Contractual Compliance Program Updates and Q&A Session Contractual Compliance department public session at ICANN 51: meeting recording, transcript, and presentation.

4

Global Domain Division Operations

The work of the Global Domain Division (GDD) of ICANN is important to companies who have

applied for new gTLDs, and also to those companies considering applying for one in a future

round. Companies contemplating evolving their online presence by registering new names

under gTLDs available to them also follow their work closely.

With over 500 contracts signed and 430 new gTLDs delegated to the root of the Internet, it is

not surprising that ICANN 51 had a record 14 GDD-related sessions. For a brief description of

each of them read the blog post, “ICANN 51: Los Angeles – Global Domains Division (GDD)

Sessions” by Akram Atallah, President of GDD.

Here are more details about some of the sessions and their topics:

Name Collision

Past issues of the Business Digest have covered this topic. You can find a summary on the

subject here.

What happened since ICANN 50?

On 30 July 2014 the New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC) of the ICANN Board approved

the Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework with a resolution directing its

implementation. The general requirements of implementation for registries are:

Act on name collision reports from ICANN within two hours of the report during the

first two years of the life of the TLD measured from the time of delegation of the

TLD.

Implement "controlled interruption" as the notification measure to alert parties that

they may be leaking queries intended for private namespaces to the public DNS.

The board also directed staff to consult with the community regarding appropriate Rights

Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) for names whose delegation is affected by this resolution. A

public comment period on the issue opened on 25 August 2014 and the final document was

published on 7 November 2014: Requirements for Implementing Rights Protection

Mechanisms in the Name Collision Mitigation Framework.

Learn More: Name Collision

Name Collision information and resources hub ICANN website page collecting all information and resources on name collision.

Guide to Name Collision Identification and Mitigation for IT Professionals This report provides extensive information on the causes and potential effects, and offers guidance on how and when to launch mitigation efforts.

Form to Report a Name Collision

If suffering name collision, report it to ICANN using this page.

Rights Protection Mechanisms: User Feedback Session

A year after the establishment of Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) for the roll out of the

New gTLD Program, the GDD team has started a review process of the RPMs and organized a

session during ICANN 51 to hear and record user feedback about these mechanisms to help

inform the general New gTLD Program review. The session focused on receiving feedback

5

specifically on the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH), Sunrise Period, Trademark Claims

Service, and Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS).

Learn More: RPMs

TMCH

The Trademark Clearinghouse has been established as a global database to support

mechanisms in the new gTLD space. The Trademark Clearinghouse verifies and

records rights information from all over the world. This includes registered

trademarks, marks protected by statue or treaty, or court validated marks as well as

any other marks that constitute Intellectual Property (IP) rights. The Clearinghouse

then provides this information to registries and registrars during the domain name

registration process.

Sunrise Period and Trademark Claims Service

The Sunrise Period of domain registration is a special period before the general

launch of a new TLD, during which trademark holders may pre-register names that

are the same or similar to their trademarks in order to avoid cybersquatting. The

Trademark Claims period follows the Sunrise period and runs for at least the first 90

days of an initial operating period of general registration. During the Trademark

Claims period, anyone attempting to register a domain name matching a mark that is

recorded in the Trademark Clearinghouse will receive a notification displaying the

relevant mark information.

URS

The Uniform Rapid Suspension System is a rights protection mechanism that

complements the existing Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)

by offering a lower-cost, faster path to relief for rights holders experiencing the most

clear-cut cases of infringement.

Trademark Clearinghouse FAQs

Trademark Protections Infographic

Universal Acceptance

The New gTLD Program has opened the door for more frequent additions of legitimate top-

level domains in non-Latin alphabets, like Cyrillic, Arabic or Mandarin. These new TLDs face

acceptance problems because of software, tool or network configurations.

The cooperation of software vendors, open source tool developers, Internet services

providers, web site developers and others is required so that these new TLDs are available to

all that wish to use them. There are three concerns to address:

Removing the "false positive" in filters preventing the use of new TLDs,

The ability to render (see and write) all names in the native script,

Achieve the intended level of safety and convenience in a rapidly changing DNS.

To this end, on 18 June 2014 ICANN opened a public comment period for a Roadmap for the

Universal Acceptance Initiative, which was published on 3 October 2014.

This roadmap seeks to be a catalyst to:

Promote acceptance of new TLDs, IDNs and Internationalized Email

Foster discussion

6

Support a “corporate memory” of progress, and supply a reporting tool for Universal

Acceptance issues

Learn More: Universal Acceptance

ICANN's Universal Acceptance landing page

This page provides overview and background of the Universal Acceptance Initiative as

well as other useful links and FAQs.

TLD Universal Acceptance Home on the ICANN Community Wiki

This community wiki page serves as a repository for presentations, public comments

and other resources.

Update on Next Round of New gTLDs

The second round of the New gTLD Program has been a subject of speculation since the

publication on 22 September 2014 of the Draft Work Plan for the New gTLD Program

Reviews and Assessment. The documents provides a mid-2017 estimated deadline for the

delegation of all new names, also known as “strings”, applied for in the first round and lays

out the work required prior to initiating a subsequent application period. This work includes:

Three Program Reviews conducted by ICANN: Program Implementation, RPMs (see

above), and Root Zone Scaling and Stability.

A Competition, Consumer Trust,

and Consumer Choice Review

process, led by a team

constituted with volunteer

community members, and

informed by consumer surveys

and economic studies.

A GNSO Policy Development

Process (PDP) in one or more

areas intended to apply to future

application procedures.

Learn More: GDD and the New gTLD Program

GDD Webinars

ICANN hosts a variety of webinars on New gTLD Program topics. View the

recordings, listen to the audio and/or download the presentations and Q/A

documents. You can also find out when upcoming webinars will take place.

Announcements

Get the most current information on the New gTLD Program, including contracting

statistics.

New gTLD Program Statistics

A snapshot of applications as they pass through program phases. Updated weekly.

7

Security & Stability Matters

SAC067 & SAC068

Since ICANN 50 in London, the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) has

published two reports: SAC067 on the History of the IANA Functions and SAC068 on the

IANA Functions Contract. During the usual Thursday morning SSAC public session, their

Chair Patrick Fältström gave an overview of the documents, which are meant to generate a

baseline of understanding for those interested in how the upper-most level of the Internet’s

system of unique identifiers is managed and an overview of the IANA contract, as well as the

roles of the NTIA and IETF in this context. The SSAC will publish an advisory with

recommendations for the IANA functions stewardship transition by the end of 2014. The

session also looked at how SSAC can make its publications more accessible and

understandable as the committee encouraged input on topics to cover in the future.

Learn More: SSAC

List of SSAC Reports and Advisories

Complete list of all documents published in different languages.

SSAC landing page on ICANN website

Contains information on SSAC history and operations, membership and workings

SSAC Public Meeting

Get the ICANN 51 SSAC public meeting recording, transcript and presentation.

DNSSEC

Companies can help enhance security of the Internet by deploying Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC), because these extensions are more effective when universally implemented. Registries, registrars, registrants, hosting companies, software developers, hardware vendors, government, businesses and agencies with an Internet presence, and Internet technologists and coalitions all have responsibility for the success of this massive effort.

ICANN 51 included a very popular, recurring session: DNSSEC for Everybody, plus two DNSSEC workshops.

Learn More: DNSSEC

DNSSEC for Everybody -- A Beginner's Guide This session aims to demystify DNSSEC and show how you can easily and quickly deploy DNSSEC in your business.

DNSSEC Workshop This day-long session is designed for registries, registrars and ISPs who are already engaged in the deployment of DNSSEC to share best practices.

DNSSEC Key Rollover Workshop Another workshop to discuss issues related to changing the root's Key Signing key – ideal for the technically minded and those with DNSSEC experience.

Verisign page on DNSSEC Adoption Benefits Useful Verisign microsite showing benefits of DNSSEC adoption for registries, registrars, and ISPs.

8

GAC Avice

The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Communiqué was issued on 15 October 2014.

The GAC provided advice to the ICANN board on several topics concerning the IANA functions stewardship transition and new gTLDS. Additional Communiqué highlights:

The GAC remains concerned that the NGPC has not adopted specific GAC proposals on safeguards concerning new gTLDs, and Category 1 and Category 2 strings set forth in the London Communiqué. These categories relate to strings that represent regulated sectors (e.g. finance, eductation, professional services) or need special safegards, and generic names consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others.

After reviews of first round of new gTLDs, GAC advised that review process be finalized before policy for further rounds of gTLD is developed and that appropriate timeframes be applied

GAC raised concerns over the consistency of the Community Priority Evaluation Process following the rejection of a number of gTLDs applications seeking consideration as being representative of a community group.

Other topics of discussion included:

Protection of Inter-Governmental Organization names and acronyms at the top and second level of domain names

Protections for the names of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent and all Red Cross/ Red Crescent Societies

WHOIS-related issues that have significant workload implications for the GAC and the wider community

Requests for two-character labels by new gTLD registry operators

Possible application of human rights and international law to ICANN activities

Protection of geographic names in future new gTLD application rounds

To read the full GAC Los Angeles Communique, click here.

To view past GAC Communiques, click here.

To learn more about the GAC and its members, visit gacweb.icann.org.

9

Internet Governance Landscape

ICANN 51 took place right before the International Telecommunications Union (ITU)

Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-14) in Busan, Republic of Korea. Held every four years, the

Plenipotentiary Conference is the top policy-making forum of the ITU where ITU Member

States decide on the future priorities of the organization, elect its senior leadership for the

coming 4-year term, and approve budgets and other plans.

In preparation, and to discuss the general landscape for 2015, ICANN 51 included a public

session featuring two different distinguished panels representing all stakeholder categories

involved. In addition to the ITU Plenipotentiary, the panels covered the WSIS Review Process,

lessons from the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2014 for its next iteration to be held in

Brazil in 2015. Panelists also discussed the results and aftermath of the NETmundial meeting

in Sao Paulo in April 2014 and the role of academia in the Internet governance debate.

Lear More: Internet Governance

ITU PP-14 website

For all the information on the conference: election results, documents, sessions

recordings, and other useful links.

NETmundial Principles

The NETmundial principles come from the NETmundial Multistakeholder Statement

published after the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet

Governance. Individuals and organizations are invited to endorse and advocate for

the application of these principles.

2015 and Beyond - An Internet Governance Update

Get the recording, transcript and presentation of the ICANN 51 public session.

CCWG on Internet Governance

The Cross-Constituency Working Group (CCWG) on Internet Governance also

covered the events since the NETmundial meeting. The CCWG on IG was created

right after the ICANN 48 meeting in Buenos Aires (when the NETmundial meeting

was announced) in order to have a cohesive ICANN community position among the

various Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees as well as staff.

10

Private Sector Participation Corner As mentioned in the introduction, private sectror participation at ICANN meetings has been growing in terms of numbers and diversity. New channels for participation at ICANN meetings have evolved, even beyond formal participation in the Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG) of the GNSO.

Advocacy Groups

The Brand Registry Group (BRG) was born out of the desire of a number of major brands to have a unified voice to navigate the New gTLD Program. The group most notably advocated to include Specification 13 to the 2013 Registry Agreement, providing limited accommodations to registry operators of TLDs that qualify as “.Brand TLDs.” The BRG held a public session on Sunday to welcome potential new .brand applicants and those awaiting the second round of gTLDs to highlight the advantages of collective action. Members of the BRG, who must meet a set criteria (including ownership of trademark rights and the intent at time of application to run the applied for string as a ‘.brand’ and not sell open registrations at the second level), include Alibaba, Amazon, BBC, Deloitte, Gucci, LEGO Juris, Microsoft, Philips, Richemont, Shell, Virgin Enterprises and Yahoo!.

Learn More: BRG

Brand Registry Group (BRG) Potential Members Meeting ICANN 51 public session.

BRG FAQ

Learn more about BRG members, services, and mission.

Specification 13 FAQ

The Domain Name Association (DNA) is the first ever industry trade group to

represent the interests of the entire domain name industry and will promote, advance and

support the common interests of the industry with regards to the provisioning, expanded

adoption and use of domain names. The DNA membership is diverse in terms of geography

and in terms of business segments and expertise represented.

The association is currently focused on implementing a framework for registry-registrar

cooperation and had a meeting on the topic during ICANN 51.

Learn More: DNA

DNA website

Get more information on the DNA mission, its membership and future events.

DNA on Slideshare and Twitter

Get the latest news regarding the Domain Name Industry and download relevant

presentations.

11

Commercial Stakeholder Group Constituencies

As always, the GNSO Commercial Stakeholder Group and its constituencies held active

discussions on an array of ICANN topics. The CSG represents the views of business users and

connectivity providers; its mission is to ensure ICANN policy and ICANN contracts are

consistent with the development of an Internet that is a safe place for business-to-business

and business-to-consumer transactions and communications to take place, based on high

levels of business, user and consumer confidence. During the LA meeting, the CSG welcomed

the developments in the ICANN Contractual Compliance department and focused much

discussion on enhancing ICANN’s accountability process, the New gTLD Program review, and

security, stability and resiliency issues.

Commercial and Business Users Constituency (CBUC)

The Commercial and Business Users Constituency (also known as the CBUC, the Business

Constituency, or BC) mainly on new gTLDs issues to address in the context of the program

review in anticipation of a second round. A few of the issues that were discussed were

predatory pricing for sunrise registration, RPMs efficacy, and name auctions procedures. BC

members also had a dialogue about how to prioritize the constituency’s heavy work load and

how to make participation easier for new ICANN community members. The BC was also

active in the GNSO Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Working Group. As

privacy & proxy services allow domain name registrants and beneficial owners to mask

certain contact details in the global, publicly-accessible WHOIS gTLD data directory, the BC

believes clear policy guidelines balancing the various interests relating to access to such data

are needed.

Learn More: BC

BC Website

Get more information about BC mission, membership, and meetings.

BC Newsletter October 2014

Overview of BC interest topics for the Los Angeles meeting.

CBUC Meeting

Recording, transcript, and agenda from the ICANN 51 open session.

Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC)

The IPC session included a briefing from the Compliance team on their dashboard tool and

related developments. The IPC also discussed the new gTLD program review plans and

anticipated steps towards a second round: specifically submitting comments to the GAC on

geographical names and feedback on RPMs and their metrics.

Learn More: IPC

IPC Website

For IPC information, position statements and news.

Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC)

Agenda, recording, and transcript from the IPC public session at ICANN 51.

12

Internet Service Provider & Connectivity Providers Constituency (ISPCP)

The ISPCP has seen a healthy growth in applications for membership and spent time during

ICANN 51 discussing how to capitalize on this momentum and maximize outreach. They

discussed in particular how to establish a Tech-ISP community within the ISPCP and to define

work tracks to match interests and inputs. The policy issues that were occupied the most

discussion time were Universal Acceptance and Name Collision, on which the constituency

has made good progress, for example in creating materials to explain and communicate

resources to address these operational issues.

Learn More: ISPCP

ISPCP Website

For ISPCP mission, membership, policy resources and statements.

ISPCP 2014 Bulletin

Constituency newsletter that covers all issues relevant to the group.

Internet Service Provider and Connectivity Providers Constituency Meeting (ISPCP) Agenda, recording, and transcript from the ISPCP public session at ICANN 51.

Tech Day

ICANN 51 brought together technical community participants – many from major Internet

corporations -- for the 25th Tech Day, in collaboration with the DNS Operations Analysis and

Research Center Annual Meeting. The day-long workshop attracted around 200 people in the

room and higher online participation than at previous ICANN meetings. Paul Mockapetris

provided a kick-off keynote on "Disruption and the DNS". Peter Marx, CTO of City of Los

Angeles, gave a fascinating presentation on the ways in which the City of Los Angeles is using

the Internet of Things. Tech day saw presentations from many security specialists from

different companies, including Facebook Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan and Yahoo Chief

Security Officer Alex Stamos, who focused on responses to Internet surveillance and

increasing attacks.

Learn More: Tech Day

Standing Room Only at ICANN 51 Tech Day

Read the blog post on the workshop from Patrick Jones.

Tech Day

Get the transcript from the ICANN 51 session and download all the presentations.

13

Stay Connected and Engage

ICANN Fellowship Program

The ICANN Fellowship Program seeks participants from developing regions and countries of

the world, in order to help create a broader base of knowledgeable constituents who will

become the voice of experience in their regions. The 50 Fellows for ICANN 52 in Singapore

were recently announced and the group includes 7 people from the business sector. The

application period for the ICANN 53 meeting will be open from 5 December 2014 until 16

January 2015. We encourage participation of people from the private sector: apply here.

Learn More: Fellowship Program

Fellowship Program Resources page

Find all the information you need on the program, its alumni, fellowship rounds and

FAQs.

ICANN 51 Fellowship story – Los Angeles, USA, Oct 2014

Read the first person account of Osama Tamimi, ICANN 51 Fellow, about his

experience in LA.

ICANN Online Learning Platform

ICANN Learn was launched during ICANN 48. This free and open online learning platform is

meant to provide a space to provide introductory information for new participants and to

share institutional knowledge, in order to increase the base of informed ICANN stakeholders.

ICANN Learn needs input and feedback to ensure the platform is as useful as possible.

Introductory courses for business participants are in development and will be available in

2015.

Go to learn.icann.org, create an account, enroll in a few courses, and start learning.

Learn More:

Monthly update on ICANN Policy Developments

ICANN Newsletters and alerts

Follow us on social media:

Twitter: @ICANN4biz

LinkedIn group: ICANN for Business

SlideShare


Recommended