Xiao Jing Deputy Chief of Regional Sub-Office, Asia and Pacific Flight Procedure Programme (FPP) Manager International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
2 September 2016 1
1 Sept.2016
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
• FPP History
– Endorsed by ICAO Assembly
Resolution A36-23 and A37-11 in
April 2008
– Begins in March 2010 in Beijing,
China
• FPP Goal
– To develop States’ capabilities
– To provide best training,
automation and quality
assurance
– Implementation is our DNA
• FPP Objectives
– Aligned to ICAO GASP and
GANP
– Supporting ASBU
– Assisting States’ implementation
of PBN Roadmap
– Became a successful story in
TCB
– Made possible for first-ever RSO
in ICAO
– Acted as a best example for in
other region
2 September 2016 2
APAC Flight Procedure Programme
3
Member of States
China
Hong Kong, China
Macao, China
French Polynesia(France)
Philippines
Rep. of Korea
Singapore
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Austrailia
10 Active Participating states
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
7 User Participating states
DPR Korea
Fiji
Mongolia
Myanmar
Pakistan
Tonga
Vietnam
• FPP Funding
– Each active State provides 20 K
USD per year
• FPP management
– Steering Committee meeting
each year : active State are
member, participating State are
invited
– Chairman elected ( current is
China )
– Linked with ICAO TCB (please
details relationship with ICAO)
• FPP Staff
– One Flight Procedure
Programme Manager (Under
MOU seconded to RSO)
– Three experienced procedure
designers, at least one with
instructor experience.
– Additional experienced
procedure designers, as
required and approved by
CAAC.
– One Information Technology
specialist.
– One Administrative Assistant, as
required and approved by
CAAC.
2 September 2016 4
APAC FPP Management
5
Key Tasks
PARTICIPATIONS IN INT’L FORUM
TRAINING
PROCEDURE DESIGN SUPPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Making Global Progress in terms of Safety, Efficiency and Environmental Improvement.
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
6
FPP Training Course
Initial Training
-Basic PANS OPS Training ~4 weeks
-PBN Procedure Design ~3 weeks
-Actual PBN Procedure Design ~Duration subject to
coordination
-RNP AR Procedure Design
-Airspace Design
-APV Procedure Training -PBN STARs
~5 days
On-the-Job Training
Advanced Training Recurrent & Refresher
Training
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
7
FPP Statistics
Total overall participants
60
Courses and Workshops
Total
2010 2016
27 States From
563
Days 1616
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
10595 Days X Capita
2 September 2016 8
Flight Procedure Programme
FPP Activities
FPP Implementation Activities
9
Republic of Korea PBN implementation WS
Lao PDR PBN implementation WS and
following up support
Myanmar & Bangladesh PBN implementation WS and TMA
procedures validation
Philippines PBN implementation WS
and following up support
Sri Lanka PBN OJT, Implementation Support,
ATCSimulator Training
Indonesia PBN implementation WS
and following up support
Malaysia PBN implementation WS and PBN OJT
Brunei PBN implementation WS
Viet Nam PBN implementation WS
Nepal PBN implementation WS
and following up support
Maldives PBN implementation WS
and following up suppor
Pakistan PBN implementation WS
02/09/2016
Tonga PBN implementation WS
and following up support
Timor-Leste PBN procedure design
and charting service India Assessing height limitations for new building plans near Mumbai airport
Cambodia PBN Implementation
Plan Review
Fiji Ops-Approval Course
Implementation
Support, PBN OJT
China RNP AR in Liping airport
RNP AR Validation for Guoluo
Airport
Mongolia PBN implementation
WS and TMA procedure
validation, ATC training
10
FPP Phase
Enhance Internal Process
• Adopt ICAO quality assurance process • Enhance FPP administrative manual • Increase capability and capacity of FPP team members
Expand Value
Creation
• Improve existing trainings and workshops -With Database of feedbacks from Participants, States/Administrations and SCM
• Increase capability and capacity of FPP team members -Quality Assurance Process for Procedure Design -PBN Implementation Follow-up Visits
Increase Public
Visibility
• Participate in relevant ICAO technical forums • Support States’ PBN events • Close cooperation with IATA and APEC
2022 2010
Begin operational Phase 1 (2010-2012)
Phase 2 (2013-2017)
Phase 3 (2018-2022)
ICAO Asia-Pacific Flight Procedure Programme
11
This data is based on the International Aerodromes as listed in the Regional Air Navigation Plans
Comparison of Resolution Targets % of States in MID/APAC meeting the Resolution Targets for Applicable Years
40%
53.3%
80%
52.6%
60.5%
78.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2016 Target 2014 Target 2010 Target
MID 2016
APAC 2016
20%
26.7%
40%
21.1%
26.3%
36.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2016 Target 2014 Target 2010 Target
MID 2010
APAC 2010
Comparison of PBN Approaches by type
31.8% 29.7%
27.2% 25.6%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
STAR SID
MID 2010
APAC 2010
44.7%
39%
53.7% 52.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
STAR SID
MID 2016
APAC 2016
% of PBN SID/STAR for MID/APAC (rate refers to the total number of instrument runways)
This data is based on the International Aerodromes as listed in the Regional Air Navigation Plans
Flight Procedures Programme (FPP)
• Beijing, China – An Prime example for the
TCB Programme to promote the PBN implementation with NCLB
• Dakar, Senegal – FPP Office established
(covers all African States) – Has shown significate benefit
• MID Region – The FPP in the region will
greatly promote the implementation process mandated by A36-23 and A37-11
13
Any Question?