+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

Date post: 01-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: lamhuong
View: 235 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
31
US Army Corps REPORT 83-4 of Engineers Cold Regions Research & ~ADfiA 12 6 334 Engineering Laboratory Ice growth on Post Pond, 1973 - 1982 CTIC L~;L - 83 04 04 054 1 aii~~ IUUi bo IW e IM P" - flsca MW gse
Transcript
Page 1: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

US Army CorpsREPORT 83-4 of EngineersCold Regions Research &

~ADfiA 12 6 334 Engineering Laboratory

Ice growth on Post Pond, 1973 - 1982

CTIC

L~;L

-

83 04 04 054 1

aii~~ IUUi bo IW eIM P" - flsca MW gse

Page 2: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

·•·

THIS DOCUMENT IS BEST QUALITY AVAILABLE. THE COPY

FURNISHED TO DTIC CONTAINED

A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF

PAGES WHICH DO NOT

REPRODUCE LEGIBLYo

Page 3: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

CRREL Report 83-4February 1983

Ice growth on Post Pond, 1973- 1982

Anthony J. Gow and John W. Govoni

Prepared forOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERSApproved for public release distribution unlimited

Page 4: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

' [ J~nclassited . .

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (".en Date Entered)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONSBEFORE COMPLETING FORM

1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

CRREL Report 83-4 1- 'b4. TITLE (ind Subtitle) S. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

ICU- GROWTtH ON POST POND, 1973-19826. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

7. AUTHOR(el 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(e)

Anthon, J. Gow and John W. C;ovoni

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASKAREA &,I WORK UNIT NUMBERS

U.S. Arly Cold Regions Research and lngineering UboratorA

Hlanover, New Hampshire 03755 DA Project 4A I 61102AT24Task A. Work Unit 001

11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE

Office of the Chief of L-gineers February 1983

Washington, D.C. 20314 13. NUMBER OF PAGES

3014. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(If different from Controlling Office) 1S. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report)

Unclassified

IS.. DECLASSIFICATION'DOWNGRADINGSCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of tile Report)

Approved for public release distribution uilimited.

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered In Block 20, If different from Report)

IM. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on revere aide If neceeary and Identify by block number)

Ice growlhIce decayPonds

20. A&TrRACT (Cw the wm w wras efif f rnce~sm ad identify by block number)

-Measurements arid analysis of seasonal ice growth and decay on Post Pond, New Hampshire. for the period 1973-1982 are presented. Observations included ice thickness measurements. examination of the various ice types contrib-uting to the ice cover, and measurements of meteorological parameters for correlation with and modeling of the ice

growth process. The overall nature of ice growth and decay (ice loss) on Post Pond has been ascertained, tile seasonalvariability in the timing of freeze-up arid ice-out and the duration of the ice cover have been determined, and the rela-

tionship of ice growth to freezing-degree-day (oC) records evaluated on the basis of a Stefan conduction equation mod-

ified to deal with ice sheets covered with or free of snow. Ice growth occurs predominantly by the direct freezing of

D . m 1473 EoT1OW or I NOV 6S IS OBSOLETE Unclassified

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Date Entered)

Page 5: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

UnclassifiedSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(Vhihn Does Entered)

20. Abstract (cont'd).

lake water, but snow ice may compose as much as 50% of the ice cover in winters with higher than average snowfall.Freeze-up leading to the establishmeat of a stable ice cover occurs during [he 4-week period from the end of Novemberto the end of December. Maximum seasonal ice thicknesses were from 45 to 67 cm and are generally attained duringthe first two weeks of March: ice-out, marking the final disappearance of ice from Post Pond, usually occurs by thethird week of April. The overall rate of ice loss is three to four times that of ice growth, and is dominated initially bymelting from the top. As much as 5011r of the ice may be lost in this way before the onset of any bottom melting.Final dissipation of the ice cover is usually expedited by candling resulting from preferential melting and disintegrationof the ice at crystal boundaries.

it Unclassified

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(When Dale Entered)

Page 6: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

PR I- A('

l it ICpoit %Na p1i aid h~I) r D . A111101i% .1. ( (1% 0I2I. Midi Johni

(Pow ilI. Ptv ci cccc i cciiciall, ol [ic Siio% and Ice Bliand). Rc'cai cl D]%;10o, Al. )-%( m(Old Rioiis Rc~cai cl and I liiicei Ing t abo: alol 1111, I cpw I

pI)Icl c ) Wd J1110CI 4N PXLI AW 102A12-1, Resealrh in iomi. imcc Iu I re :',i

(11omild, I a4 A .\% Wa k LII. I W XI. Ph I'si wi/)l'It% o/ I~~ I Io I i'.

[ tic (cctiili'calf c~ff tc.it (1i' tcriort % cic Di). (Pcoi cc A'iior aiid ko% ic'.Ifhc dlil iol tc ui aitul lo \it. I11aic" 1ti a\\I i tii 'ii iicicoiilotL'kjcl aIpCcI, 0I

14 is GRA&IDTIC TAB-

Unan-f oun ced3~jUstf~L~tio'.--

Dist 11blit 101/ _

Availability CodesAvail n~nd/or

Dist Special

Copy

"N't-cre

Page 7: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

CONTENTSPage

A b strac t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. iPreface ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Introduction . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . ..

Location of' studsN ... . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .I. . . . .

Stud'. m ethods ..................... 3Ice th i c k n e sss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. 3Ice-co~er composition .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Surface air tem peratures . .I. . . . . . . . . . . .I. . I . 4

I reeze-up and ice-out characteristics. . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . 5Results and discussion ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... .

Ice-grossth re c r d.. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Free/ing-dlegree-day reco rs .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .Ice-gross t prediction s .. . ... . .. . . . .. .. .. 14

Sum minar and conclusions. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . 14Literature c i t ed... . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 15Appendi\ A: Ice-growth re c o r ds.. ............. .

Appettdi\ 11 Measured anld compu)Lted ice-gross t curs s ........ 23

ILLUSiTRATIONS

I igijreI it photo ot Post Pond. 'Iboss ing locations" ot thle prlian ice-thicknes

nai~en NIC sie.......... ..................... ......... 22. Vct tical ctlion throiieh al; IL-ce)C as seci it) the side ess% of a large

beamll cuit from (tlic ice,....... ............. ....... ........ 23. \ cical thin sctliolN o1 icc from Post Pond sliss ing stratigraphic and

MIi ci ural characctristics...... ............................. 34. onic coiiduciis% pi pof ice obtained oil meltsater sampjles, fromt Ithe Post

I'oflic 8 I .anuar\ 1974 .................. ............ 4si agcs oht uiossh and deca\ oh. thie ice co er on Post Pond duriit the

(1te o 1974 ... ........................ ...0. ICe-s-'IOsstl hoiindakr\ of thce kid shlossi ill Figure 5b ................. 6

-. Stratigialtt1c sctions' illiitratiti2' sCLqiitiial gros th and decas of [thePost Flrd 1c, -. .. III..I..... ... .I.... . .. S

S. StratigialtIC seC;i011S denionstrating thle nlature oft ice loss On PostP'ond................... I........... I.. I.......

9. (nutulat~ isefett de edsecords t or CR RI forl 1973 1 982. I IS10. ( 1ii in it I at reeintg -deg ree-dao records f1in in Post POl o nL... I..I........1 2II. Seasonal ice-thickness, mamina ss hriccitt-degrec-da\ tot als a m ii -

lated beissei treec-up itild ice tnlast1ium al POst Ponld.........1

TABLES

TrableI . Post Pond ice-cos Cr dat a................. ...... ....

2 D~uratiotn of' ice cmi5er ott Post Pond... ................3. kMa~iiuni ice thickmtess, for selected lakes in Ness I impshirc and V. e-

miontl.......................................................4. Post Pond frtee/ itg- degree-da\ anid ice t hicktiess data ................. 13

iv

Page 8: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

ICE GROWTH ON POST POND, 1973-1982

Anthony J. Gow and John W. Govoni

INTROI)UTION ascertain the nature of the ice grosth and decayprocess on the pond, 3) to evaluate year-to-year

The purpose of this report is to summarize se,- variations in winter air temperatures at Posteral Nears' measurements of the growth and dissi- Pond, and 4) to examine the relationship of icepation of ice covers on Post Pond in Lyme, New growsth to freezing degree-days ( 'C) measured atHampshire. These measurements were performed Post Pond and at CRREL.in conjunction %, ith the authors' studies of thephysical, structural and mechanical properties oftemperate lake ice, centered on investigations at LO(ATION Of" STII)Post Pond. This work was directed towards an-derstanding the bearing capacity and trafficability In 1968 Parrott and Fleming (1970) establishedcharacteristics of lake ice sheets. These p;operties a CRRLI_ test facility on Post Pond for investigat-depend to a large degree on the structural makeup ing the year-round thermal structure of Postof the ice, which reflects the condition under Pond: this facility has continued to be used for awhich the ice sheet grows, matures and decays. variety of ice-related projects. Post Pond (Fig. I)Results of observations obtained since our studies is a small eutrophic lake of glacial origin situatedwere initiated in the winter of 1973-74 are con- approximately 3 km north of the town of I yme,tained in a series of reports mainly devoted to the New Hampshire, and about 20 km from CRREI..mechanical and physical properties of Post Pond The pond is in a region of cool temperate climateice (Gow and Langston 1975, Gow 1977, Gow and with a mean annual temperature of 4 7°C andLangston 1977, Gow et al. 1978, Gow, in press). with minimum temperatures as low as - 35 'C. It

Beginning with the winter of 1973-74 the growth covers approximately 0.46 km:, has a maximumand decay of ice on Post Pond has been monitored depth of about 12 m, and is thermally dimictic.each year to the present. Observations have in- i.e. it generally circulates twice a year Trouteluded ice thickness measurements, identification Brook, the major stream entering Post Pond. isof the various ice types contributing to the ice coy- located less than 300 m from Clay Brook, the ma-er, and measurements of meteorological parame- jor outlet stream, which ultimately flows into theters for correlating with and modeling ice growth. Connecticut River several kilometers northwest ofThe major objectives of the work described in this Post Pond. Details of the origin, physiographicparticular report were I) to determine the variabil-- setting, hydrology and thermal characteristics ofity in the timing and duration of freeze-up and Post Pond were given by Ragle (1963) and Parrottdissipation of the ice cover on Post Pond, 2) to and Fleming (1970).

11..1111 M 111

Page 9: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

1~o- 1i411f pht of, 1)l l IIas 1'wl. s01lving Ilctil('/I o/ Ihc

!-igulrt 2. 1 ertical setio til , i/i ill n cove (DI'S wen in''? [Ihe side view'o (I a

lurA,' hew?? cut - Im flit' uI(,. / /'sitw tia'i Sh'ows 'Snow at itt' ) t r it iAt t' hi' can

at %flow it ( am/ hlA 0, Ct aiC d)(Itt cilf

Page 10: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

26 Feb '74 Thickness

(em)

0

10

20

30

40

r-·igure 3. Vertical thin sections ql ice .from Post Pond sholl'ing stratigraphic (a) and structurrrl (b) characteristics. The /ayaing in a is the result of air lmhh/cs in the ice. In h, photographed between crossed po/amid1· to reveal the oystalline texture of the ice, the transition !Jet u·een sno11' ice (on top) and lake ice is espe­cially u·ellmarked. Tire lake ice is comrmsed entirely r~/ large, {Jri.\'11111/ic n)'S/11/.1· with 1'('1'/ical c-axes. In this sec­tion several episodes rd .\·now-ice jim nation can he dis­tinguished on the hasis r~f grain-si~e rl!f.ferences.

STUDY METHODS

lee thickness

Each season, ice thickness measurements were initiated at the edge of Post Pond and continued until the ice was thick enough to establish sam­pling sites farther out on the lake. In 1973-74 these measurements were made at a large number of locations, mainly to determine variations in ice thickness with location on the Jake. There were no significant variations in ice thicknesses measured at sites located 25 m or more from the shore (Gow and Langston 1977) (Fig. A 1). Accordingly all subsequent measurements of icc thickness were obtained by averaging measurements made weekly at three or four locations along a line beginning about 25 m offshore and extending just beyond the center of the lake (Fig:-!). The majority of ice thickness measurements were obtained from holes drilled through the ice sheet. These data were sup­plemented with measurements made in connection with in situ testing of large ice beams (Gow and Langston 1975, Gow et al. 1978) and on blocks of icc used for investigating the crystalline structure of the icc sheet at different stages of its growth.

Ice-cover composition Post Pond ice covers are typically composed of

two kinds of icc: lake ice and snow ice. Lake ice is formed as lake water freezes to the underside of the icc cover. Snow ice is formed on top of the ice sheet as water-soaked snow freezes. (Sometimes the terms "white icc" and "black icc" arc used for snow icc and lake icc, respectively, but the lat­ter terms arc preferred here because of their ge­netic significance.) The two types of icc arc readily distinguished visually in the walls of a hole drilled into the ice cover or on a block cut from the icc sheet. The di ffcrcnces observed in an ice beam (rig. 2) arc demonstrated even more vividly in a vertical thin ( < 0.5 mm) section of the ice sheet placed between crossed polaroids (Fig. 3). The small equant crystals and abundant air bubbles in the snow icc arc easy to distinguish from the coarse-grained, vertically elongated crystals of the underlying lake icc. Snow icc always forms by the infiltration and freezing of water in snow. Me­chanisms by which water infiltrates snow on Post Pond include uprise of lake water through cracks in the icc, downward percolation of rainwater, snowmelt, and discharge of nood water onto the snow-covered lake icc from streams along the shore, particularly Trout Brook. Since water­soaked snow usually freezes from the top down, it is not uncommon to find layers of unfrozen water

BEST AVAILABLE COPY

Page 11: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

Lmho/cm which soluble ions are rejected by the freeling ol

0 - ---- ater ith an original ionic conductivity of 60-80

S.mho'cn. Only the sno, ice shows an eleatedconductivity. In this instance the lake itself \Aas

16.0 the source of infiltrating water, and it constitutedabout 20Go by volume of the snow ice.

Surface air temperaturesDuring October 1974 a standard instrument

1.7 shelter \%as erected on the edge of Post Pond. Thisshelter ",as equipped with a seven-day, clock-

.5 drisen, mechanical hygrothermograph for ineas-uring air temperatures continuously throughout

E the .%inter and maximum and minimum thermo-1 3meters for calibration. Excellent records were ob-0 tained during the winters of 1974-75 and 1975-76.

Unfortunately these measurements had to be ter-minated during the 1976-77 winter because of re-'2

1.2 peated vandalism. However, a comparison ofrecords obtained at Post Pond with those routine-Ilv measured at CRREL, 20 km south, revealed nosignificant differences in average daily tempera-tures between the two sites. (An earlier anal sis by.2 Gow and Langston 11977], based mainly on air

temperature records from the Dartmouth CollegeWeather Observatory in Hanover, New Hamp-

1. 5 shire, had indicated that winter daily temperaturesat CRREL might average as much as 0.5 °C warm-

20- er than those measured on Post Pond, but morerecent measurements indicate that this is not the

6.7 case.) Accordingly we have depended on tempera-tures measured at CRREL to calculate freezingdegree-day data for analyzing ice sheet growth onPost Pond.

igure 4. Ionic (electrd.tic) conductiviiy pro.file Of primary interest here are the daily maximumobtained on meltwater samples tom flthe Post and minimum air temperatures, which are usedPond ice cover. 18 January 1974. for calculating the freezing-degree-day number S..

This number, a very useful index of winter tem-perature regime, is usually obtained from

sandwiched between lake ice and snow ice. Thesemechanisms and their impacts on snow ice forma- -maN - Trnjtion on Post Pond were discussed in more detail SO C 2 (I)by Gow and Langston (1977). A detailed discus-sion of the structural characteristics of the lake ice where Tmax and Tmin are the daily maximum andis beyond the scope of this report. Suffice it to say minimum air temperatures, respectively.that the crystalline structure of Post Pond lake ize Day-by-day summations of SO yield cumulativehas remained remarkably constant from winter to freezing-degree-day (°C) records that have provedwinter. As indicated in Figure 3 this structure is useful in demonstrating year-to-year variations indominated by the growth of large, vertically winter temperature regimes. In addition the con-elongated crystals with vertical c-axis orientations cept of freezing-degree-days has been used widely(Gow 1975). in conjunction with the simple Stefan heat con-

As demonstrated by Gow and Langston (1977) duction equation to estimate and/or predict icethe natural freezing of lakes usually leads to sig- growth on rivers and lakes (for example, Bilellonificant partitioning of the chemical constituents 1964, Michel 1971, Ashton 1974, 1978 and Batesin the water. Figure 4 demonstrates the extent to 1980). Both of these applications of freezing-

4

Page 12: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

degree-dav records are used in this report to comes established, is usuall> preceded bs one orevaluate air temperature regimes and ice growth more episodes of' freete-ox'er. Freetec-over occurson Post Pond for the period 1973-1982. whenever the surface of' a lake or a subsantial

part of' it skims over with ice. Occasionally initialfreeze-over may coincide with freeze-up if air cmn-

FREEZE-UP AND ICE-OUT peratures across the surface of' the pond remainCHARACTERISTICS low enough to allow a stable ice sheet to form (4-6

cm thick). Any rapid onset of freeze-up is usuallsFreeie-up, here defined as corresponding w~ith preceded by lower-than-normal air temperatures,.

the date that a permanent winter ice cover be- which lower temperatures in the near-surface

ci. Ice cot' ;aru1wiaulli twabhiu'jd, 19 December 1 9'4. 1. lIce c over l/ll established. 26 Dececmbher 194.

N?

c. Midinuter ice' cuver, fitW (-erutrv 1975. (1. Shorelim pl antd ragmen'Ptinice Wcoe sigC '1-

naling alrprutach of ict-out. inid-April 1975.

I igurc' 5. Siag'e% of &:rowili anti decaly of flit it-(' covet- on Po04 JPondifi/uinmve , wi'r of 197'4- r

Page 13: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

lopl

1-igure 6. Ice-growth houndar v uthe kind shown in I-i.ure 51. Thewe on either .ste Sid ol the oundar y for zed a pro.mul,eh jour (1a is (I/Wr.

water column sufficiently close to 0°C to encour- along the grain boundaries of ihe component cr,,-age early formation of a stable ice sheet by direct tals) that even light winds can cause it to disinte-freezing of the lake water. Such a sheet usually grate. Occasionally Post Pond will clear itself ofgrows several centimeters thick before any signifi- ice b"v "ind rafting and pile-up of ice ,heet frap-cant accumulation of snow occurs. The effect of ments along the shore. The final disappearance ofsnow is twofold: while it impedes lake ice growth ice from the pond is defined as ice-out. Ice-outby virtue of its insulating properties, it can, when and freeze-up characteristics vary from year toinfiltrated by water, supplement ice sheet thicken- year and are treated in greater detail in subsequenting by forming snow ice. Occasionally, however. sections of this report.the onset of freezing is accompanied by snowfall The sequence for the winter of 1974-75 (Fig. 5)sufficiently thick to create slush on top of the is fairly typical of the ice growth and decay on,water, which, if conditions remain cold enough, Post Pond. A close-up view of the boundary sepa-can freeze to form a stable ice cover. A more rating ice that formed scveral days apart (as showngeneral situation on Post Pond is a progressive in Figures 5a and b) is given in Figure 6. On 26freeze-up in which separate areas of the pond December some unusual circular structures, up tofreeze over independently before they finally 2 m in diameter, that had formed in ice less than 5coalesce to form a shore-to-shore ice cover. De- cm thick were observed (see cover). These struc-pending on the weather pattern in any particular tures were all located within 200 m of the shoreyear, as much as a month may elapse between the along the northern edge of the pond. In a numberinitial appearance of ice on Post Pond and final of cases the top of the ice extending for some dis-freeze-up. Following freeze-up the ice sheet con- tance beyond the edges of the structures was dis-tinues to grow downward by freezing of the lake tinctively ripple-marked. Though the structureswater (a process sometimes referred to as congela- were not observed as they formed, the occurrencetion) and upward by the formation of snow ice. of the ripples, together with observations made on

Dissipation of the ice cover on Post Pond usual- vertical sections of several of the structures them-ly begins during the latter part of March and is selves indicate that they originated as melt holesusually complete by the third week of April. This resulting from the upwelling and overflow ofprocess is dominated initially by surface melting warm water, possibly from springs on the bottomuntil the ice sheet becomes thin enough (<20 cm) of the pond. The subsequent refreezing of water inand so weakened by candling (gross mechanical the melt holes probably exerted sufficient pressureweakening of the ice cover by preferential melting on the thin ice at the edges of the holes to create

6

Page 14: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

the radiate crack patterns. Similar structures were occasionally observed in subsequent winters, but never in ice thkker than 5 em and never in the pro­fusion that was observed on 26 December 1974.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Icc-growth records lce·growth hiqories, regional surface air tem­

peratures, and summary accounts of each year's icc growth and dissipation are presented in Appen­dix A. The overall shapes of the growth and decay curv·:s show some variation, mainly in the lag be­tween the attainment of maximum ice thickness and the onset of r.1elting. The average ice-growth velocities varied from 5 mm/day (1979-80) to 9 mrn/day (1980-81). By contrast the average ice dissipation rates varied from 17.5 mm/day (1975-76) to 23 mm/day (1977-78). These data and the records in Appen::!ix A show that once ice loss be­gins, it occurs three to four times as fast as ice growth. The ice cover usually dissipates without a break until the ice cover has completely disap­peared. Occasionally a period of substantial melt­ing may be interrupted by resumption of ice growth followed by renewal oi Hblation (e.g. 1978-79 and 1980-81 ). The premature thaw beginning the second week of February 1981 is especially well documented since it resulted in thinning of the ice from 59 to 30 em in about 10 days (Fig. AS). In 1979-80 the ice grew fairly uniformly (5 mm/day) until it reached its maximum thickness, which was followed almost immediately by virtu­ally uniform thinning of the ice at a rate four times that pf kc growth (20 mm/day). A case of "lev­eled out" growth is exemplified by the winter of i 977-78. Beginning with freeze-up the ice grew at a nearly uniform rate of 8.6 mm/day until it was 62 em thick (about 10 weeks later); it did not reach its maximum thickness (67 em), however, until nearly five weeks later. This was followed by rapid melting at a rate that averaged 23 mm/day.

Lake ice was the predominant icc type on Post Pond for the period 1973-1982. The contribution of snow icc to the total ice thickness varied from SOUJo in 1975-76 to less than 7UJo in 1980-81. The total ice thickness varied from 45 em in 1973-74 to 67 em in 1977-78 and 1981-82.

The major icc events for 1973-1982 are listed in Table I, which shows that freeze-up can occur as early as the end of November or as late as the fourth week of December. Dates of maximum ice thickness are highly variable, ranging from 9 Feb--­ruary to 24 March. Ice-free dates were all in ;\Pril,

7

Table 1. Post Pond ice-cover data.

Max. ice Freeze-up thickness Max. ice /ce·free

Winter date (em) date date

1973-74 17 Dec 45 24 Feb 19 Apr 1974-75 26 Dec 47 10 Mar 20 Apr 1975-76 17 Dec 60 16 Mar 20 Apr 1976-77 29 Nov 52" 15 Feb N.D. 1977-78 10 Dec 67 24 Mar 29 Apr 1978-79 13 Dec 58 24 Feb 13 Apr 1979-80 18 Dec 54 12 Mar II Apr 1980-81 6 Dec 59 9 Feb 7 1\pr 1981-82 14 Dec 67 15 Mar 27 Apr

• Thickness data unreliable because of activities of ire fisher· men, leading to widespread depression and flooding of the ice cover.

Table 2. Duration of Ice cover on Post Pond.

Time/rom Time from freeze-up to max. thickness

max. thickness to ice-out Winter (days) (days)

1956-57• 82 57 1968-69t 88 42 1973-74 70 54 1974-75 75 41 1975-76 91 35 1976-77° 0

1977-78 105 36 1978-79 74 48 1979-80 86 30 1980-81 65 57 1981-82 92 43

• Data from Ragle (1963). t Data from Parrott and Fleming (1970).

•• No rcllulllc dutn uvuilnlllc.

Duration of ice cover

(days)

139 130 124 116 126

141 122 116 122 135

with the earliest on 7 April and the latest on 29 April. There appears to be no systematic relation­ship between these events, at least not of a· predic­tive nature, implying that these events are con­I rolled solely by we at her.

Table 2 shows the time to maximum ice thick­ness and the ice cover duration for each winter from 1973 to 1982. The time from freeze-up to maximum ice thickness varied from 70 days to 105 days. The duration of the ice cover ranged from 116 to 141 days, and the time between the ice max­imum and ice-out varied from 30 to 57 days.

Trapped air bubbles are characteristic of ice formed from lake water; layer~ of bubbles can be seen in the stratigraphic section in Figure 3. In this instance very rapid freezing-between 22 and 25 De­cember 1973 led to the formation of a distinctive

Ei;~T AVAiLABLE COPY

Page 15: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

E26 Feb 74

6Feb174 FC 26 Mar 74

A 8 in7426 Dec'73 B

2 Jar, '74 * -4

p -Apr14

36 ccm

L ke Ice 27c n

5 M45 cm 40cm

"iure 7. Strafiraphic ec'on.s ilutratin, sequential growth and decay o thePost Pond ice cover (1973- 74,. A./1 sectot. art, referenced to ihe to/) (/ a dihknosti(buhhle zone marked h k an arrow beside set'lion .

0 5 Mar 82 balanced by the growth of 2 cm of ice on the bot-F 7 tom. Section C reflects both an addition of snow

0 2A pr ice on the top and continued growth of ice on the- - - 4 Apr bottom. The snow ice formed from the freezing of

I water that had infiltrated snow that fell between 9

20 and 11 January. With further periodic accretionof snow ice and continued freezing of lake water

0 - 22 Apr 26 Apr at the bottom, the ice cover continued to thicken,30-

o 27 Apr 82 as indicated in sections D and E. Section E repre-All Ic Melted sents the Post Pond ice sheet at its thickest, when

40 it was composed of 13 cm of ice and 32 cm of lake

ice. By 26 March the ice sheet had thinned from 4550 cm to 40 cm, entirely as the result of snow ice

melting from the upper surface. An additional 1360o cm of ice was lost by 4 April (section G), including

Li Snow Ice all the snow ice. Only 21 cm of ice remained by I IApril, by which time the ice had begun to candle.

70 Lw Loke Ice Mechanical degradation of ice by candling, lead-ing to increased permeability to water, is a major

Figure 8. Stratigraphic sections demonstrating the factor in the final disintegration of Post Pond ice

nature of ice loss on Post Pond (1982)..4 1/ sections cor.covers.

are referenced to the bottom of a very thick snow-wieaver.Ice is lost both from the top and bottom by

melting (Figs. 7 and 8). Melting from the top pre-dominates as the ice sheet begins to melt on Post

bubble zone (between the arrows in Figure 3). Be- Pond, particularly for ice covers with thick snowcause this bubble zone could be traced across the ice. In some years melting from the top surface ac-entire lake, it was used as a reference layer for counted for as much as 7007 of the total ice lossmonitoring all subsequent growth and decay of immediately preceding candling and final disinte-the ice cover, both from above and below. gration of the ice sheet. These observations for

Ice blocks excavated during the 1973-74 winter Post Pond are in general agreement with those ofallowed the major ice events to be reconstructed Williams (1966) for Canadian lakes.(Fig. 7). Between sections A and B was a warm For comparison with Post Pond, ice thicknessesperiod at the end of December, and 2 cm of ice were measured on several other lakes in Newwas lost from the top. This loss was subsequently Hampshire and Vermont, all within 30 km of Post8}

Page 16: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

Table 3. Maximum ice thickness (cm) for selected lakes in New Hampshire and Vermont 1973-1982).

Post Pond Mascoma Lake Canaan Sireei Lke Crs-stal Lake Lake Morev Lake fairleeiter (Lyme, N.H.) 0:nfield. N.H.) (Canaan, N. 11.) (Enfield. N.tt.1 (-airlee, Vt.) (f-airlee, It l

1973-74Snow ice 13 13 ....Lake ice 32 38 ....Total 45 51 - - - -

1974-75Snow ice 09 30 24 24 06 20Lake ice 38 34 25 23 36 29Total 47 64 49 47 42 49

1975-76Snow ice 30 20 24 22 21 36Lake ice 30 41 29 26 30 25Total 60 61 53 48 51 61

1976-77Snow ice - - 18 24 07 14Lake ice - - 37 32 37 33Total - - 55 56 44 47

1977-78Snow ice 17 26 32 25 18 25Lake ice 50 52 41 45 49 41Total 67 78 73 70 67 66

1978- 79Snow ice 23 24 23 27 21 24Lake ice 35 35 34 29 33 22Total 58 59 57 56 54 46

1979- 80Snow ice 5 9 6 8 9 12Lake ice 49 50 45 51 48 49Total 54 59 51 59 57 61

1980-S1"Snow ice 4 10 2 7 5 9Lake ice 55 32 46 42 47 35Total 59 42 48 49 52 44

1981-82Snow ice 31 44 54 38 32 39Lake ice 36 20 20 31 29 23Total 67 64 74 69 61 62

Except for Post Pond all the ice thickness data were obtained during the latter part of January 1981 before these lakes hadreached maximum thickness. An unusually early and severe thaw during February 1981 presented measurements of maximumice thickness on these lakes.

Pond (Table 3). Because of differences in topog- preciable amounts, in some cases by more thanraphy and exposure, some lakes accumulate less 2:1.snow, and hence less snow ice, than others. PostPond, for example, usually incorporates less snow Freezing-degree-day recordsice than any of the other lakes. Generally, in all Cumulative freezing-degree-day records (0°Cthe lakes studied, there was more lake ice than base) for CRREL for 1973-1982 are presented insnow ice, but appreciable variations in the ratio of Figure 9. Records obtained at Post Pond for thethe two ice components can occur from year to winters of 1974-75 and 1975-76 are presented inyear, mainly due to the regional pattern of snow- Figure 10. lncluded for comparison are the 7-year-fall. The winters of 1979-80 and 1980-81 both had normal curve for CRREL for the winters of 1973-exceptionally low snowfalls in New Hampshire 74 through 1979-80,* and the 30-year-normaland Vermont; only small amounts of snow iceformed, less than 20o0 on all six lakes. By con-

f Though the thickness data presented here include the w inter,trast, in 1982-82 exceptional amounts of snow ice of 1980-81 and 1981-82, plots of the first 7 year, were pre,

were produced; at all the lakes except Post Pond, pared and the manuscript of this report subsiantially drafted

the snow ice was thicker than the lake ice by ap- before the data from 1980-81 and 1981-82 were reduced.

9

Page 17: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

_ 0

K-40 N0

-00

~~~~0 w-N

0 cr ) 0N

- E E \\

o o> 00

a 0-0 0 0 C, c0 0,L. \ ,40 0 0

,)-) q :)0 s pja buza_ U~ )s~pajijbta4

I' 0o

0 l 0 0 0 0N 0000 r 0 M 0 0

Y4

Z .'n L 0

K 0

0 -a

0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

* IW v- 00- to I -

fos'~q :).) sAop-soJBOO buizoosjd (s oq .) sAop-9oj~baO buhzo;ij

10

Page 18: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

* liii _7Z_

T1F1 IT - -*'0,

I 1 -- I,

V 0~

I IN

-. 0

8 'oN T )

0 0 -

(I I C. -

0 0

14,

CIDa

~c>r- ,.7 Cr2

o 0-r- . I a:

ItO 0

(DDq 0.0) IAP-001640 a'zoi. loo :)'D .) :1Pojbc ulo:

Page 19: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

0 0.r

z- z

-~ ~ CL

CL

Z3-

%,~ 0 0- 00

co 10' a

0 000 0

z zO a)p-i~t toZ z z

r- 0

112

Page 20: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

Table 4. Post Pond freezing-degree-day (0WC base) and icethickness (cm) data.

At1 max. Between Ireeze-up ,taU. weWinter A iJreeze-up Ihc'knes,

, and fulx. thikness thCknei.%

1973-74 95 590 495 45

1974-75 105 610 505 471975-76 80 830 750 601976-77 40 920 880 -1977-78 70 920 850 671978-79 110 790 680 581979-80 75 640 565 541980-81 22 721 699 591981-82 5 O55 805 67

curve for the Hanover Cooperative Weather Sta- at freeze-up coincided with the earliest freeze-uption for 1941 to 1970 (U.S. Department of Corn- dates recorded during the 1973-1982 period, 29merce 1973). The CRREL and Post Pond records November 1976 and 6 December 1980. Bothshow that Post Pond was slightly colder during the events were preceded by lower-than-normal fall1974-75 winter; there were no significant differ- temperatures, which would promote the earl,ences between the sites in 1975-76. The normal- formation of a stable ice cover if followed by sea-ized curves show that CRREL averages about 90 sonable December air temperatures.freezing degree-days colder than Hanover; this Freezing-degree-day totals at maximum icevalue agrees closely with the 80 degrec-day differ- thickness also varied greatly from year to year,ence in the 1973-74 winter (Gow and Langston ranging from 550 in 1974-75 to 920 in 1977-781977). The values are different because the (Table 4). The measure most closely related to iceCRREL weather station is more exposed than the growth is the freezing-degree-day total accumu-Dartmouth (Hanover) observatory, where the lated between freeze-up and maximum thickness;winter temperature inversion associated with the Table 4 shows that the thinnest (45 cm) and thick-elevated and sheltered position of this observatory est (67 cm) ice sheets correspond to the lowest andmoderates the air temperatures.

Freezing-degree-day (°C) records also demon- oo00strate year-to-year variations in winter tempera-ture regime and trends. For example, the tempera- 2 8o

tures for the 1973-74 winter at CRREL don't de- Bo

part significantly from the 7-year average. The g Ewinter of 1974-75 was appreciably warmer than E' 600average. The next four winters were much colderthan the 7-year normal; the freezing-degree-day 400indices at the end of those winters all exceed 800, a

and the index for the 1976-77 winter exceeds 950, .o 956 -57a value close to the maximum expected for this lo- 200 ( 967-68cation. The 1979-80 winter temperatures werehigher than the 7-year normal until a cool period 0 .

30 40 50 60 70in late February raised the index to nearly normal. Maximum Tickness of Ice (cm)

The end-of-winter indices for 1980-81 and 1981-82 were higher than normal. Figure I/. Seasonal ice-thickness maxima

Freeze-up dates can vary by as much as a month vs freezing-degree-day (°C) totals accum-(from late November to late December), and the ulated between freeze-up and ice maxi-freezing-degree-day totals at freeze-up can also nuin at Post Pond (including measure-vary, depending on the weather during autumn inents for 1973 to 1982 and for the wintersand immediately preceding ice formation (Table ofl956-57[Ragle 19631 and 1967-68[Par-4). The two lowest totals of freezing degree-days rot and Fleming 19701.

Page 21: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

highest freezing-degree-day totals, respectively, speed could dramatically influence the magnitudeThe ice thickness and the number of freezing of ice growt'. To demonstrate this effect for Postdegree-days between freeze-up and maximum Pond, curves were recomputed to include the el-thickness are linearly related over the entire range fect of a 6-cm-thick snow layer and a wind spcedof ice thicknesses measured on Post Pond (Fig. of 4.5 m/s. The choice of 6cm to approximate theI1). Despite the two-part nature of the ice sheets real conditions was based partly on observationsthat form on Post Pond, this relationship is not of the snow cover on Post Pond, and partly on theaffected by the amount of snow ice. record of snov, depths measured each year at

[ ong-term meteorological records maintained CRRVL. The measured growth curve can be satis-at the Hanover Observatory show that it is unlike- factorily correlated with one of the two predictedly that freezing-degree-day totals accumulated be- ice-growth curves, depending on the winter's pat-tween freeze-up and maximum ice thickness on tern of snowfall. These relationships are especiallyPost Pond would ever exceed 900 or fall below well illustrated in extreme years; for example, the400. These values and the data from Figure 10 actual curve and the predicted curve without ashow that the maximum ice thickness on Post snow cover for the "snowless" winters of 1979-80Pond should neither exceed 72 cm nor be less than and 1980-81 show excellent agreement. For the40 cm. winter of 1975-76, which had abundant sno ,fall.

ice growth predicted on the basis of a 6-cm-thickIce-growth predictions snov, cover correlates very closcly with the meas-

The simple empirical relationship for estimating ured ice-growth curve.ice thickness n(t) is

n(t) = a4 (2) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

where !:S, is the sum of the freezing degree-days Beginning with the winter of 1973-74the growthbetween freeze-up and ice maximum and a is a nu- and decay of ice covers on Post Pond, New Hamp-merical coefficient. The value of of may be esti- shire, have been monitored each year to 1981-82.mated from This 9-year record of observations included ice

thickness measurements, identification of the vari-4 2,i/ T7K (3) ous ice types contributing to the ice cover, and

measurements of meteorological parameters for

where K i is the thermal conductivity of ice, Li is correlating with and modeling ice growth. Freeze-the ice density, and X is the latent heat of fusion of up, leading to the establishment of a stable iceice. The value of a for ice growth under conditions cover, occurred during the 4-week period from theof perfect heat transfer is 0.000121 m s- °C-'2. end of November to the end of December. Maxi-Because heat transfer conditions are normally less mum seasonal ice thickness was usually reachedthan ideal, an additional correction factor j3 has to during the first two weeks of March, with timesbe applied. Accordingly from freeze-up to maximum ice thickness ranging

from 65 to 105 days. Maximum measured ice thick-a = (0.000121). (4) nesses ranged from 45 to 67 cm. The regional

freezing-degree-day (0C) records indicate that iceFor snow-covered ice sheets on lakes 3 varies from thicknesses on Post Pond are not likely to exceed0.5 to 0.7 (Michel 1971). A value of 0.6 was cho- 72 cm or be less than 40 cm. Ice-out, correspond-sen for Post Pond, giving a final correction coeffi- ing with the date that Post Pond loses all its ice,cient a of 0.00007 m s-'2 C-A/. usually occurred during the second and third

Measured and computed ice-growth curves are weeks of April. The time from freeze-up to ice-outpresented in Appendix B. For most winters the ranged from 116 to 141 days. Ice growth com-measured and predicted values of ice thickness puted on the basis of freezing-degree-day records,agree reasonably well. The greatest departures ap- including the effects of a snow cover, yielded re-pear to be in those years with substantial snowfall. suits in reasonable agreement with observations.From trial computations with an ice-growth equa- Ice growth occurs predominantly by the directtion (Ashton 1978), which incorporates both the freezing of lake water, but snow ice, formed byinsulating effect of a snow cover and the heat- the freezing of water-soaked snow, can accounttransfer effect of wind, it was determined that for as much as 500 of the total ice thickness. Theeven a thin layer of snow or a relatively low wind loss of ice from Post Pond is dominated initially

14

Page 22: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

by melting from the top, which may result in as (,ow. A.J. and 1). Langston (1975) Flexuralmuch as a halving of the ice thickness before bot- strength of lake ice in relation to its growth struc-tom melting begins. Mechanical deterioration of ture anid thermal history. CRREL_ Research Re-the ice cover by candling is also a major factor in port 149. Al) A020964.speeding the disappearance of ice from Post Gow A.J. and 1). Langston (1977) (jroskth his-Pond. tory of lake ice in relation to its straflgraphic. c:rys-

talline anid mechanical structure. CRRLI Report77-1. AD A036228.

LITERATURE CITED Gjo%, A.J.. H.1. Ueda and J.A Ricard (1979)Flexural strength of ice on temperate lakes-C'oi-

Ashton, G.D. (1974) Esaluation of the ice man- paratise tests (if large cantilexr and simplN. %tip-agement problems associated with operation of a ported beams. CRRFL Report 78-9. AD A054218.mechanical ice cutter on the Mississippi River. Michel, B. (1971) Winitcr regime of risers andCRREL Special Report 214. AD A00)5030. lakes. CRRFI[ Cold Regions Science and Lingin-Ashton, G.D. (1978) River ice. Annual Review of eering Monograph Ill-Bl1a. AD 724121.fluid Mfechanics. 10: 369-392. Parrott. W.H. and W.M. Fleming (1970) The tern-Bates, R.E. (1980) Winter thermal structure, ice perature structure of a mid-latitude, dimictic lakeconditions and climate of Lake Champlain. during freeiing, ice cover and thawing. CRRLICRREL Report 80-2. AD A082304. Research Report 291. AD 715716.Bilello. M.A. (1964) Ice prediction curves for lake Ragle. R.H. (1963) Formation of lake ice in a tern-and river locations in Canada. CRREL_ Research perate lake. CRRL3L Research Report 107. AlDReport 129. AD 445874. 433794.C~ow, A.J. (1975) Growth characteristics of ice on U.S. Department of Commerce (19713) Monthl%a temperate lake. In AhstractN of' Papers Pre- normals of' temperature, precipitation, and liez:-senied ut XVI General Assenrbit of the hrr'erna- ing and cooling degree-da,. Ne\\ England (1941-lional Union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Giren- 1970). Climiatography of the U.S. No). 81. Nation-oble, France, pp. 139. al Oceanic arid Atmospheric Administ rat ion.Gow. A.J. (1977) Flexural strength of ice on tem- Williams. G.P. (1966) I-reeie-up and break-up of'perate lakes. Journtal of Glaciologv. 19(81): freshs~ater lakes. Ini Proc'edinrr~s o f thre Coil f'-247-256. ence onl Ice Prs r 4raO Structur-es. N at in alGow. A.J. (in press) Contribution to physical Research Council (Canada) Technical Manual 92.properties. In River and Lake Ice Engineering. pp. 203-215.(G.D. Ashton, Ed.). International Association forHydraulic Research.

Page 23: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

APPEND)IX A: ICE-GROWTH RECORDS

-' -~-.Snow-ice--E 0-

20- PA Site

~-30-

-~40-

10 20 '0 20 10 20 0 0 0 20I Dec Jon I et Mr2 Ap

0

1 0

S20- PC SiteC PB Site",.

,30

(o I SateI c,

'0 20 010 2 0 12 0 20 102Dec Jon' Feb Miar Apr

20-

-20,

-30.

0 20 f 0 2.0 10 20 02 '0 0Dec '73 Jon 74 Feb rAr

Figure Al1. Ice growth on Post Pond and the dailty mnaxinm andinimnum surface air temperatures at CRREI. for the winter of

1973- 74. (Fromt Gow and Langston 1977.) (Thckneii~ data 1- om threeother stes are included to demounstrate the small variahilit'i in we thwA knes.%e~s measured at variouw loc-atiom~ on Post Pond.) Initial ireeze-o ver oc-curred during the might of 13-)14 JDevenyer. This produced a 4- to5-mtick we sheet, wthich melted coimplete/v during a warmn period on 14 and 15December. A steep decline in surface air temperatures fiollow-ed. leading toIreeze-up on 17 D)ecember. The iwe c-over attained its inaxmuen thick ness045 cm) during the last week of 1-ebruarsy 1974. However, the ice sheet,composed of 13 ci of snow wce overlyving 32 (i oflako ice, did not undergoany appreciable thinning until the second week of April. BY 19.4April the icec-over had disappeared coiplerth.

17 I- = M ?A u&AW-bo ILM

Page 24: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

-4T1~ -

N t4

10 7

-00

S r-

- -tz

Cc ,

-l U')I-N T rt

0 0

1--

0: oc

r- I I I-

~~ufl)~u SSUZLI 4c ZI)~f&C~w

F~rrti TrTrl r -r Z

o 0

In r tN~

z1 0-* ;1

tt

0 -0

0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

(W3) S~aPID41. a~l (3) 3ifl4Oadwaj L.

18

Page 25: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

-% 2

o 0c

qr o~ w

- 0 o

0< - z~

- -

o0- Z! z

z %z

0 2 0 0 N ~7 TTaqun) osu34181aim da

Lit==i

Page 26: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

- 2- -Z

-t

202

Page 27: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

co C-C' ;

-c:

Ln~

-0 Z

-:Z

000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0

LuJl)ssu-Ij aSS8U i nj ad (~)J'~ w ai

81 - zz ;

- - - 2

o 0

rz II- a,.'

oO

ot

_o~

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £ 0

2! 4z

Page 28: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

APPEADIXI B: ME[ASUREDI AND) COMPUTED i('t-(;RONT H CUiR% ES

.o -0 ;z z

)L z -

-0

0,I- n -i-

CD 0u 00 00 0

i-ttECE1M PAGE BLAK-IOTn flIb

23

Page 29: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

EL E

T-- k

0 040

N 0 0

0')

F 2:

00~

LI N* NI(LU3)SSOUZ)14 ssoxD~w 0:)

-~ .-. ~ '0 4

Page 30: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

.VZ

Z -Z:z

- -Z

z az z>

10 -0 -5~-

-rz

-C

E1 E

0 t 0

-0-,

0~~ 0 004

25

Page 31: Ice Growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982

A facsimile catalog card in Library of Congress MARCformat is reproduced below.

CGow, Anthony J.Ice growth on Post Pond, 1973-1982 / by Anthony J.

Cow and John W. Govoni. Hanover, N.H.: U.S. Cold Re-gions Research and Engineering Laboratory; Springfield,

Va.: available from National Technical Information Ser-vice, 1983.

iv, 30 p., illus.; 28 cm. ( CRREL Report 83-4.Prepared for Office of the Chief of Engineers by

U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab-oratory under DA Project 4A161102AT24.

Bibliography: p. 15.1. Ice growth. 2. Ice decay. 3. Ponds.

I. Govoni, John W. II. United States. Army. Corps ofEngineers. III. Army Cold Regions Research and Engi-neering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H. IV. Series: CRRELReport 83-4.


Recommended