+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA...

ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA...

Date post: 04-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17 Edited by: K. Hirata, J.M. Jowett, S.Y.Lee August 1998
Transcript
Page 1: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter, No. 17

Editedby: K. Hirata,J.M.Jowett,S.Y.Lee

August1998

Page 2: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

Contents

1 From the chairman 4

2 Letters to the Editors 52.1 Call for Creationof Accelerator& BeamPhysicsForums . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2 FromK. Makino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 Workshop Reports 83.1 ICFA WorkshoponBeamDynamicsIssuesfor e

�e� Factories . . . . . . . . . 8

3.2 Summaryof the5th ICFA mini-WorkshoponBeamLoading . . . . . . . . . . 93.2.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.2.2 ExistingMachines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.2.3 TheJHF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3.3 Strong-StrongBeam-BeamWorkshopatSLAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113.4 SpaceChargePhysicsin High IntensityHadronRings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.4.1 WorkshopLay-out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133.4.2 PlenarySessions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143.4.3 WorkingGroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143.4.4 Resultsof theWorkshop.Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

4 Activity Reports 164.1 MUSESProjectof RIKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

4.1.1 AccumulatorCoolerRing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.1.2 BoosterSynchrotronRing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174.1.3 DoubleStorageRing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

4.2 Activity in Padova . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204.3 LHC CollectiveEffects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214.4 BrazilianSynchrotronLight Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

4.4.1 Designof asynchrotronbooster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224.4.2 Improvementof theorbit stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224.4.3 Measurementof thelinearcouplingcoefficientby analysisof thetrans-

versebeamprofile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234.4.4 Optics Calibrationof the LNLS StorageRing Via ResponseMatrix

Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244.5 AcceleratorandBeamSciencein theAtomic Energy Societyof Japan . . . . . 244.6 AcceleratorPhysicsActivities in Spain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4.6.1 SynchrotronLight Laboratoryof Barcelona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274.6.2 Otheractivities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

4.7 Activitieswith SAD in KEK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284.7.1 Historyof SAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284.7.2 TheFirstSAD Workshop. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

4.8 New DoctoralThesesin BeamDynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314.8.1 Kyoko Makino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314.8.2 ZhirongHuang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314.8.3 JiuqingWang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

5 Forthcoming BeamDynamicsEvents 335.1 Laser-BeamInteractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335.2 SpaceChargeDominatedBeam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

2

Page 3: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

CONTENTS 3

6 Announcementsof the beamDynamicsPanel 356.1 AdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

6.1.1 NonlinearandCollectivePhenomenain BeamPhysics . . . . . . . . . 356.1.2 FutureLight Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

6.2 ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS MINI-W ORKSHOP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366.3 ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

6.3.1 Aim of theNewsletter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376.3.2 Categoriesof theArticles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376.3.3 How to PreparetheManuscript . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386.3.4 Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

6.4 World-WideWeb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396.5 ICFA BeamDynamicsPanelOrganization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Page 4: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

1: Fromthechairman

Kohji Hirata����������� ���������������������

TheChairmanof ICFA BeamDynamicsPanel

Sincethe “Renaissance”of the beamdynamicspanelaround1994,the panelhasbecomemoreandmoreactive. It waspartlybecauseof theeffortsof thepanelmembersbut wasmainlybecauseof thestrongsupportof theworld-widebeamdynamicscommunity. Althoughsuchacommunityis still “underconstruction”,its necessityhasbeenwell recognizedby many. Theacceleratorsocietyneedsmorebeamdynamicsspecialists.

In fact, the numberof beamdynamicsspecialistsis increasing.It is not only becauseofthe increaseof the modernaccelerators,but alsobecauseof the increaseof the demandsonthe beamquality. To proceedfurther, it seemsthat we shouldestablisha bettercontactandcollaborationwith physicistsin otherfieldsof physics.We needtheknowledgeof otherfields.If theonly outcomeof thebeamdynamicsis, however, to constructgoodaccelerators,andif thebeamdynamicsdoesnot createenoughoutcomesusefulto otherdisciplines,it cannotattractphysicistsoutsidetheacceleratorcommunity. Therelationshipshouldbemutualandreciprocal.

A goodexampleis the researchof thenulearfusions. It hasproducedtheplasmaphysicswhichhasshedlight onastrophysics,geophysics,andevento acceleratorphysics.I believe thebeamdynamicscanproducesimilar outputs,usefulandinterestingfor many otherdisciplines,becausethebeamis a very specialstateof thematterandits understandingshouldrevealnewpropertiesof thematter. Recently, for example,while working for KEK B factory, I have beendreamingof the “thermodynamicsof thebeam”. Sucha thing shouldexist, althoughit mightnotdirectlybeusefulfor constructionsof accelerators.As thechairmanof thispanel,I hopetoencouragetheactivitieswhichdeepenandwidenthebeamdynamics.

��������� ���Thisyear, wedonothavethepanelmeeting.Instead,avirtual meetingis underwaythrough

e-mail.Thereportwill bepublishedin thenext issue.A.Hofmannhasretiredfrom thepanel,in accordancewith his retirementfrom CERN.He

hasbeenan active membersince1991. He worked very hard for realizing 6-th AdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsworkshopon”Synchro-BetatronResonances”(Madeira,1993)in aquitedifficult time for thepanel.I would like to thankhim for hiscontribution to thispanel.

4

Page 5: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

2: Letters to theEditors

2.1 Call for Creationof Accelerator & BeamPhysicsForums

DearMembersof theAccelerator& BeamPhysicsCommunity,Particleacceleratorsareusedin almostevery field of physicsfrom elementaryparticlesto

solid statephysics. Acceleratorsarefinding a variety of applicationssuchas ion implanta-tion andlithographyin industry, medicineradiotherapy andfood sterilization. The needandimportanceof accelerators,andits impacton thesocietyneednoelaboration.

As youareaware,thattheAccelerator & BeamPhysicsandassociatedtechnologiesarenotyet partof the regularuniversitycurriculumin mostpartsof theworld! The learningof suchan importantinterdisciplinaryscienceis doneto a very large extent individually andthroughthevery few Schoolswhen& whereavailable.Thisverycuriousscenariois exacerbatedby theneartotal absenceof Divisionsof Accelerator & Beamsin mostof thePhysicalSocietiesallover theworld.

It is interestingto notethatin recentyears,many very interestingandusefuldevelopmentsin BeamPhysicshave takenplacein remotedepartmentsoutsidethe acceleratorlaboratories,by physicistswith aprimarytrainingin otherareasof Physics.Fromtheseit is evidentthattheycancollaboratewith acceleratorphysicistsandproduceinterestingandusefulresultsin areasofbeamdynamics,freeelectronlasersandseveralothertopics. A symbolicevent justifying theabovestatementsis thelastICFA AdvancedBeamDynamicsWorkshoponQuantumAspectsofBeamPhysics,heldatMonterey, bringingtogetheroverahundredphysicists.A detailedreportof thishistoricmeetingis to befoundin theICFA NewsletterNo.16April-98 andthenumerouscontributionsin theproceeding(in press, Ed. PisinChen,World Scientific,Singapore,1998).Sucha workshopbecamerelevantonly recently. ¿Fromsuchmeetingsit is evidentthatBeamPhysicsis growing rapidly in remotedepartmentsoutsidethebig acceleratorlaboratories.Weneedmoreof suchmeetingsto caterto the topicsnot yet addressedin the existing Meetings.To keepupwith thegrowth of thebeamphysicistscommunity, it is essentialto haveadditionalMeetingsto accommodatethegrowing numberof personnelandwider rangeof topics.

By introducingBeamPhysicsin the regular university curriculait is sureto attractmoreminds to tacklesomeof the openandvery challengingproblems,which aredrawing a newattentionwith ever increasingdemandfor higherenergiesandluminosityandlower emittancebeamswith ever increasingparticlespeciesandsaturationin the existing methodsof particleacceleration.Weneednew resultsandrevolutionarytechniquesfor futuremachines.

Anotherpoint which I would like to bring to focusis thesteadygrowth of AcceleratorandBeamPhysicsCommunityin thedevelopingworld, whohave little or noaccessto acceleratorsin their own regions. We needto enhancetheir participationin the existing SchoolsthroughmoreFellowships,particularlyfor thetravel. TheAbdusSalamInternationalCentrefor Theo-reticalPhysics,ICTP , Trieste,Italy canprovideanexcellentvenueto holdsuchSchools.ICTPin its long andvery generoustradition hasbeendoing so in many otherareasof Physicsandothersciences.This will take careof theparticipantsfrom thedevelopingcountries,andalsothewide rangeof topicsof interestto thecommunityworld-wide,by bringingtogetherphysi-cistsandacceleratorpersonneltogether. Thiswill definitelycomplimenttheexistingprestigiousSchoolsandthefew efforts in thedevelopingcountries.Thusstrengtheningthecommunityinmorethanoneway!

Foracompleteandnaturalgrowthof any field it isessentialtohaveaproperForum.Tofacil-

5

Page 6: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

6 2. LETTERSTO THE EDITORS

itatetherequiredgrowth of theAccelerators& BeamPhysicsCommunitywe need,immediateinclusionof Accelerator & BeamPhysicsin regular University Curriculumon a globalscale,more Internationaland National Schools, creationof active Divisionsof Accelerators/Beamsin variousPhysicalSocieties,andnew Forumsin the form of BeamPhysicsClubs/Societies.All theseshall have a very significantrole, throughtheir Regular Courses,PeriodicSchools,Newsletters,Fellowshipsand shall strengthenthe Accelerator& BeamPhysicscommunityworld-wide. This hasbeenthe casein variousotherareasof Physics,for a very long time!Why shouldbeamphysicsmakeanexception?

It is noteworthyto seehow theICFA BeamDynamicsPanelhascontributedto theaccelera-tor & beamphysics.Thewell-attendedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshopsareoneof theproofsof its big success.It wouldbeworthwhileto holdBeamPhysicsSchoolsundertheauspicesofICFA. SuchSchoolswould beextremelyuseful,particularlyto thebeginnersin thefield. Wecanbesurethat theseSchoolswill be very successfullike the ICFA Workshops.ThewidelycirculatedNewsletteris providing anexcellentmediumfor communication& discussion.It canbefurtherusedfor thecreationof new Forumsappealedin thisLetter.

It is hopedthat the decision-makerstake noticeof this appealanddo the needfulwithoutany furtherdelay.Sincerelyyours,SameenAhmedKHAN

�!����"�����#�$%"�&�"'$(�INFN-Padova,Via Marzolo8, Padova35131ITALY�����!�*),+-+�.�.�.�/��#0$%"�&�"*$(�1+�23�!�1��"1+�.���4-5-�(6��78�-��694

2.2 From K. Makino

DearHiratasan,

A recentvisit to KEK remindedme of the periodwhenI hadbeena graduatestudentinJapan. Having completeda Ph.D. in a US university recently, I have experiencedboth theJapaneseand Americangraduateschoolsystems,which is somewhat unusualfor Japanese.Followingyoursuggestion,I wouldliketo sharesomethoughtsaboutthedifferenceof graduatestudybetweenJapanandtheUSwith thecommunity.

Tobeginwith, letmeaddresssomecharacteristicsof theJapaneseeducationalsystem.Somepeopleknow thattheemphasisis putonthemereadmissionto auniversityor acollege,whichisdeterminedby verychallengingexams.Theexamsaresocompetitivethatnamesof schoolsarea measureof students,hencethequality of their later jobsandlivesis very muchdetermined.Not only high schoolstudents,but thewholesocietyview it asa goal to passentranceexams,evenoccasionallystartingfrom thepreschoolperiodaskindergartenexams.As aconsequence,the educationallevel of freshmenof universitiesandcollegesis very high, but almostall ofthemareburnedout. It is evencustomaryto view college life asa relaxationperiod,sparingseriousefforts for a laterjob life. In bothundergraduateandgraduateschools,thecourseworkis not very demanding,soseriousstudentsusuallymotivatethemselves,andgraduatestudentsusemostof thetime for researchwork right away.

BecauseI cameto the US to pursuea Ph.D. I went througha seriesof graduateschoolrequirementsincluding substantialcoursework for the first years. I hadknown the hardre-quirementof courseworksin theUSasastory, but therealitywastougheryet. It is understoodthatonly threegraduatecoursespersemesterkill almostall thetime of a seriousstudent.Usu-

Page 7: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

2.2. FROM K. MAKINO 7

ally graduatestudentsstartresearchwork afterthecoursework of thefirst years.Anotheraspectto mentionis therearemany graduatestudentswho cometo schoolaftersomejob experience,which is still ratheruncommonin Japan.

With sucha remarkablecontrast,I amnot readyto make any judgementwhich of thesys-temsis betterthantheother;but I certainlyappreciatedthefactthatI couldexperienceboth.

Kyoko Makino6����9%"1����"9:�5!4;�6<:(=*>�!#�=

MichiganStateUniversityNationalSuperconductingCyclotronLaboratory

Page 8: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

3: WorkshopReports

3.1 14th AdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshop on BeamDynamicsIssuesfor e? e@ Factories

L. Palumbo4�����4�=!6�A1���-��B-��6��7�=-"<����(61�1CD$(�

Univ. La Sapienza,Roma/LNF-INFN

TheAdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshopon “BeamDynamicsin e�

e� Factories”,washeld at FrascatiNationalLaboratories(LNF) of INFN from the 20th to 25th of October1997. The workshopwasorganisedby ICFA, INFN, the Universityof Rome“La Sapienza”,with thescientificsponsorshipof BINP (Novosibirsk),CESR(Cornell),IHEP (Beijing), KEK(Tsukuba),LBNL (Berkeley), SLAC (Stanford).About80participantsattendedtheworkshop.

Theaimof theworkshopwasto gatherworld-wideexpertson theoreticalandexperimentalissuesrelatedto thehigh luminosity, with particularregardto thedevelopment,commissioningor designof E , B andtau-charmfactoriesandLEPandCESRcolliders.

The workshopstartedwith a plenarysessiondevoted to the luminosity performancesofthe CESR(J.T. Rogers)andLEP (J.M. Jowett) colliders,andto the stateof several projects:DA E NE (G. Vignola) , BINP RoundBeam(Y.M. Shatunov), PEP-II (J.T. Seeman),KEKB(K. Oide), TCF (Y. Wu). Four review talks on “InteractionRegions” by H. Koiso, “SingleParticleDynamics”by J. Irwin, “Beam-Beam”by M. Furmanand“Instabilities” by S.Heifets,introducedthediscussionto theworking groupsorganisedin parallelsessions.A full daywasdevotedto the discussionof TCF beamdynamicsissues.Summarytalks of working groupsconcludedtheworkshop.

TheworkinggrouponInteractionRegionswaschairedby D. Rice.Two majorsubjectwerediscussed:comparisonof thechoicesmadein thedesignof IRs for severalprojects,andhowthepresentinteractionregionscanbemodifiedin orderto increaseluminosityby oneorderofmagnitude.A deepanalysiswasdoneon theopticsdesign,solenoidcompensation,chromaticcorrection,beamseparationandcomparingthe relative advantagesanddisadvantagesof dif-ferentschemes.The groupdiscussedthe backgroundlevels in the detectorsasit is the mostuncertainoperatingparameterin IR realisation.The “round beam”opticswasof particularlyinterestbecauseof theexpectedlargerbeam-beamparameterwhich offersa possibilityof lu-minosityincrease.

ThegrouponSingleParticleDynamics,chairedby J.Jowett,covereda varietyof subjects.The“Model independentuseof BPM families” presentedby J. Irwin in theplenarytalkswasdiscussedfurther. Featuresof the latticedesignfor maximumopticsflexibility andchromaticcorrectionup to the 3rd order, and the latestprogressin the commissioningof PEP-II werepresented.Several methodsrelying on the kicked beammeasurementsexploring the latticenon-linearitieswerediscussed.A novel andelegantmethodfor dynamicalaperturemeasure-mentsbasedonthedetailedunderstandingof theTouschekeffectwasdescribedby A. Valishev.Fringe-fieldsin shortmagnets,particularlythosein thedetectorsolenoids,andtheir effectsonthedynamicalaperturecalculationswerealsodiscussed.

ThegrouponBeam-Beamwaschairedby K. Hirata.Themaintopicscoveredin thesessionwere:Beam-beamlimit, crossinganglebeam-beamtail, coherentmodes,monochromatization,roundbeam,strong-strongsimulation. Two semi-empiricallaws reproducingreasonablywelltheobservedbeam-beamlimit for F � F�� machineswerepresented.Of particularinterestwerethepresentationsanddiscussionsonthecoherentmodesandLandaudamping,andin particular

8

Page 9: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

3.2. SUMMARY OF THE 5TH ICFA MINI-W ORKSHOPON BEAM LOADING 9

ontheroleof thebeam-beamparameterG �IH G�� . TheMobiusoptionwhichpermitsroundbeamsandeasychromaticitycorrectionwasalsodiscussedin detail.

TheworkinggrouponImpedanceandInstabilities,chairedby L. Palumbo,coveredlongitu-dinal singlebunchinstability, conventionalcoupled-bunchmodeinstability andcures,fastioninstabilityandelectroncloudinstability. A bunch-lengtheninglaw, reproducingtheexperimen-tal data,basedon thequantumrandomkick in energy andlongitudinalpositionwaspresented.The Fast Ion Instability measurementsmadeat ALS confirmedsomeof the featuresof thisinstability, althoughthe exact growth rate law is still not defined. Therewasstronginterestin the experimentalandsimulationresultsof PhotoElectronInstability. Dedicatedmeasure-mentsdoneat BEPC(Beijing), have foundthatalthoughthe thresholdis very low (20 mA ofpositrons),it is stronglydependenton thegapbetweenbunches,andsuppressedby chromaticcorrection.Severalcomputercodeshavebeenimplementedin ordersimulatethemechanismoftheelectroncloudformation,andtheinteractionwith thebeam.It seemsthatthecloudoscilla-tionshaveeffectoverashortrangeof 3–4bunches.ThecomputercodesreproducequalitativelythePEI,but their reliability still seemsuncertain.

Theproceedings,collectingmostof thepaperspresentedin theworkshop,arebeingpub-lished.

3.2 Summary of the 5th ICFA mini-Workshop on BeamLoading

R. Baartman������A������1%=!6�&�J5��

TRIUMF

3.2.1 Intr oduction

TheWorking Groupon High-BrightnessHadronBeamsof ICFA BeamDynamicsPanelspon-soreda Mini-workshopon “Beam Loading” in high intensity hadronsynchrotronsat KEK-Tanashifrom February23 to 25,1998. It waschairedby Y. Mori ([email protected]),andC. Ohmori ([email protected]) actedassecretary. The purposeof the workshopwastodiscussthe basicproblemsof beamloadingand to examinetheir cureandcompensationinhigh intensityhadronsynchrotrons.Othertopicssuchasbarrierbucket andimpedancecontrolwerealsocovered. Thebeamloadingissuesof the JHF3GeV and50GeV rings, in which amagnetic-alloy loadedRFcavity is to beused,wereexaminedasa casestudy.

Theworkshopwasattendedby 48 people,roughlyequallysplit betweenforeigners,KEK,andnon-KEKJapanese.

3.2.2 Existing Machines

Existing machineshave useda wide variety of techniquesto combatbeamloading. Presen-tationswere as follows. M. ,Yoshii (KEK-PS), M. Blaskiewicz (BNL-AGS, AGS-Booster),W. Chou (FNAL), R. Garoby(CERN-many), T. S. Wang (LANL-PSR), P. Barratt (DRAL-ISIS).

Of these,the PSRis probablynot a fair comparison,sinceit is fixed frequency and socanuseacathodefollowerconfigurationwith noadditionalfeedback.Of theothers,theCERNperformanceis notfairly representedby suchatable,consideringthattherearemany rf systemsatdifferentfrequenciesin thePScomplex, anddebunchingandrecapturehavebeensuccessfullyperformedunderconditionsof heavy beamloading.

Page 10: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

10 3. WORKSHOPREPORTS

Machine Current(Amps)Achieved:RutherfordISIS 11.AGSBooster, AGS 6., 7.3CERNPSB,PS 4.3,4.3KEK Booster, PS 4.8,1.0LANL PSR

2LK�MFNAL Booster 0.8Proposed:JHFBooster, PS 13,13

Table3.1: AC beamcurrentachieved

The AGS is noteworthy asachieving the highestbeam-loadingratio for a synchrotroninthe many-GeV range. Of particularinterestis the longitudinalphasespacedilution. This isperformedusinga cavity runningat 33.75timesthebeamfrequency. A barrier-bucket schemeis underdevelopmentin collaborationwith KEK.

The ISIS beamcurrentis quite impressive andis encouragingfor developmentof higherintensitymachinesusingconventionalferrite tuning. With respectto beamloading,the highcurrentis achievedusingacombinationof feedbackcompensationof theinducedvoltagein thecavitiesandde-N ing usingaCuSOO resistor.

3.2.3 The JHF

High time-averagedintensityis achievedby combininghigh circulatingcurrentwith rapidcy-cling. This will be the approachin JHF aswell. The latter implies large rf voltageper turn,while theformerimpliesheavy beamloading.In orderto achievehigh rf voltage,it is advanta-geousto go to higherrf frequency whereresonantstructurescanbebuilt which do not includelargevolumesof lossyferritesto bring thefrequency down. ThiswastheapproachadoptedfortheFNAL booster, andthe(defunct)SSCandKAON proposals.Unfortunately, suchefficientrfcavities aresobecauseof their high N and PRQ , andthis combinedwith high circulatingcurrentmeansthattherewill beaproblemwith parasiticcavity modes.A wayaroundthis is to chooselow N cavities,whereall modesarenaturallydamped.Unfortunately, suchcavities have smallgapvoltagesandthereforea largenumberarerequired.This increasesbothcapitalandrunningcosts.

An innovativeapproachbeingpursuedin theJHFdesignis to useametallicmagneticalloyinsteadof ferrite. Sincethesematerialshave higherCurietemperatureandsaturationmagneti-zation,higherrf flux densitiesandgapvoltagesarepossible.Resistivity canbein therealmofstainlesssteel. This combinedwith the relatively low rf frequency yieldsa large-enoughskindepth:corescanbecomprisedof woundtape,a few tensof micronsthick.

Extremelylow N is possiblein suchadesign,withoutlowering PRQ to thepointthatexcessivepower is requiredto drive the cavity. In fact N 2SM�TVU hasbeendemonstrated,with P3Q H N 2W�X M7Y

. Thereare two advantagesto this type of cavity design. Wakefieldsdecaybetweenbunches,so coupled-bunchmodesarenot dangerous,andno tuningof the cavity is required.On theotherhand,thebroadimpedancewould leadto largepotential-welldistortion. In otherwords,beaminducedvoltagemustbe compensatednot only at the fundamental,but at other

Page 11: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

3.3. STRONG-STRONG BEAM-BEAM WORKSHOPAT SLAC 11

harmonicsas well. The JHF teamis aware of thesedifficulties and presentedschemesforcompensatingup to 3 harmonics.Thebeamloadingmodellingwasperformedfor a casewithall bucketsoccupied.Partially-filled ringsandkicker-gapcasesweremodelledby simulation.

Thediscussionbroughtupanumberof otherissuesto considerbeforethiscanbeconsideredaviablerf systemfor high intensitysynchrotrons.Z Thepropertiesof themagneticalloy shouldbecheckedto make surethey do not change

underconditionswheretheexcitationfrequency variesquickly with time. This is a po-tentialproblemin fast-cycling synchrotrons,ashasbeentheexperiencewith theFNALboosterferrites.Z Thestandardbeam-loadingtheoryneedsto begeneralizedto cover thecaseof suchlow-N cavities,sincein someapproximation,theusualmodelof aparallel P\[7] circuit is notapplicable.Z The measuredimpedancefor the prototypecavity wasfound to be low enoughfor fre-quency below 30MHz. Theremay be high-N resonancesin the rangeof 100MHz tobeam-pipecutoff. Thisshouldbemeasured.

An interestingaspectof low- N accelerationcavities is that thereis no longerany reasonto usea singleFouriercomponentto acceleratethebeam.In fact,therf systemis meantto accomplish3 purposes.(1) Energy gain to maintainsynchronismwith the magneticfields; (2) Slopein energy gain to keepthe buncheslongitudinally focused;(3) Somenon-linearityto Landau-dampinstabilities. In a sinusoidalrf system,these3 arefixedby choiceof ^ and _<Q . However, in a broad-bandrf system,the 3 canin principle beindependentlyvaried. This may provide a better, moreflexible rf systemandmay turnout to benomorecomplicatedthanfeedbacksystemsto zeroout thehigherharmonics.

3.3 Strong-StrongBeam-BeamWorkshop at SLAC

J. Irwin���.9%"���:�4���5`J:�����"�&�����#0>��#!=

SLAC

A small 3-dayworkshopon thestrong-strongbeam-beamwasheldat SLAC June8-10th,1998,ontheoccasionof a two-monthvisit to SLAC andLBL of SrinivasKrishnagopal(Centrefor AdvancedTechnology, Indore,India),who wasresponsiblefor thefirst truly strong-strongbeam-beamsimulationsdevoid of assumptionson the form of bunchdistributions[1]. Alsoattendingthe workshopwereJoeRogersandhis student,Edwin Anderson(Cornell), who iscurrentlycompletinga strong-strongsimulationcode,Miguel Furman(LBL), DonaldKouri(Univ. of Houston),Vladimir Shiltsev andJim Holt (FNAL), RobertRyne(LANL) andpar-ticipantsfrom SLAC including YunhaiCai, Kwok Ko, Witold Kozanecki,JohnIrwin, BorisPodobedov, JohnSeeman,BobSiemann,KathyThompson,BobWarnock,YitonYanandFrankZimmermann.

The workshopbeganwith a historicalperspective on theory, experimentandsimulationsdeliveredby Bob Siemann,followed by a talk on strong-strongsimulationsfor neutralizedbeamsby Boris Podobedov. Miguel Furmandescribedthesimulationshehaddonefor PEP-II.A sessionon the statusof currentsimulationefforts includeddetailedtalks by KrishnagopalandAnderson. Following this Rob Ryne led a discussionof the gainsonecanexpect fromparallelizationandexistingrelevantalgorithms.A morningwasdevotedto theconsiderationof

Page 12: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

12 3. WORKSHOPREPORTS

possibleimprovementof solversusingDAFs (DistributedApproximatingFunctionals)whichweredescribedandinventedby DonKouri [2]. In a sessiondevotedto experimentalissuesJoeRogersgaveatalk onbeam-beamobservationsatCESR,Witold Kozaneckipresentedplansforbeam-beammeasurementsatPEP-II,andJohnSeemangaveaperspectiveonPEP-IIluminosityupgradeoptions.

Siemanncommentedthat: i) all publisheddataonbeamprofilesaverageovermany turns,sothereisnodefinitiveevidencefor oragainstturn-by-turnvariations,ii) haloscanbeproducedbymodulationof coresin highcurrentprotonbeams,iii) 0- and a -modedipoleoscillationsareob-served,iv) observations,simulationsandtheoryshow flip-flop behavior whichis observedto beextremelysensitive to machineconditions,v) theoryandsimulationspredictso-calledhigher-ordermodeperiod-Nbehavior, vi) the Vlasov equationsolutionsby Derbenev [3], DikanskyandPestrikov [4] andRuthandChao[5] show period-Nbehavior but do not agreeon details.Neutral-beamsimulationsby Podobedov hadperiod-Nbehavior agreeingwith reference[4].Theneutralbeamcaseis richerpresumablyfor lackof Landaudamping.

Thesimulationcodesof KrishnagopalandAndersonusesimilar, thoughnot identical,Pois-sonsolver routines.As of theworkshoptheKrishnagopalcodelackedlongitudinalslicing anddid not yet allow for asymmetricbeam-beamparameters[6]. Anderson’s codecontainedthesefeaturesbut wasstill beingbench-markedagainstactualmachineconditionsandobservedbeamsizes.It is theintentionof bothof theseauthorsto make their codesavailablefor publicuse.

JoeRogersemphasizedthe importanceof machineconditionsin the beam-beambehav-ior anddescribeda bunch-by-bunchprofile monitorunderdevelopment(original ideaby TongChen)usingoptical fibersanda photo-multiplier array, a new operatingpoint nearthe half-integer that gives a larger beam-beamtune shift, and the first experimentson the Mobius-twistedlatticewhich lookedpromising.

Seemanemphasizedtheimportanceof thebeam-beamphenomenafor PEP-II,anddescribedpathways,suchashighercurrents,lower b *, increasebeam-beamtuneshifts,andrelaxedtrans-parency conditions,beingconsideredthat, in thebestof all worlds,could leadto luminositiesashigh as

Kdc e(M�f O H�g�hjidkml�n . Thesurprisesthatmaybeofferedby theasymmetricconditionsarebeingcautiouslyawaited.

Becauseof its small sizethe workshopcould be highly informal. Therewasampletimefor discussionand debate. Therewas a generalappreciationthat the beam-beamcomesinmany flavors(whenlinearcollidersarealsoconsidered)andcanbeaveryrich andcomplicatedphenomenawhenall the real-life conditionsareincluded. It canbeexpectedto beanareaofincreasingimportancewith many applications.

We wish to apologizeto anyonethatwould have likedto attendbut did not receive notice.Arrangementswerevery lastminute,andgrew largerthanoriginally expected.We would alsolike to expressourgratitudeto all participantsfor theireffortsandthoughtfulcontributions.

References

[1] S.KrishnagopalandR. Siemann,Phys.Rev. Lett. 67,2461(1991),andS.Krishnagopal,Phys.Rev. Lett. 76,235(1996).

[2] D.K. Hoffmanet. al., Variationalderivationandextensionsof distributedapproximatingfunctionals,Journalof MathematicalChemistry20,p117(1996).

[3] Ya.S.Derbenev, N.S.Dikanskii,Dampingof coherentbeamoscillationsin astoragering,SLAC-TRANS-0106andNovosibirskpreprint,IYF-69-315(1969).

Page 13: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

3.4. SPACE CHARGEPHYSICSIN HIGH INTENSITY HADRON RINGS 13

[4] N.S.DikanskiiandD.V. Pestrikov, Colliding beamscoherentinstability, Part.Accel.12:27-37(1982).

[5] A.W. Chaoand R.D. Ruth, Coherentbeam-beaminstability in colliding beamstoragerings,Part.Accel.16:201-216(1985).

[6] Shortlyafter theworkshopKrishnagopalincludedthepossibilitiesfor asymmetriccolli-sionparameters.First resultsshouldbeavailablesoon.

3.4 Shelter Island Workshop on SpaceChargePhysicsin High IntensityHadron Rings

AlfredoU. Luccio4�=95�5-�����A�"14;po���q

BNLBrookhavenNationalLaboratory

On May 4-7,1998,we helda Workshopon ShelterIsland,New York, at thePridwin Hotelon the waterfront. The main purposeof the Workshopwas to review recentprogressesandthecurrentstateof understandingof spacechargerelatedphenomenain high intensityhadronsynchrotronsandaccumulatorrings,with specialattentionto new machinesbeingconsidered(suchastheSNS,ESS,JHF, r -ColliderDriver...). Attendancewasby invitation.

In choosingalocationfor theWorkshopwewantedaplacebothnottoofarfromBrookhavenandasecludedlocation.ShelterIslandcameto mind,asit hasbeenthelocationof anumberofconferencesthroughtheyears,not theleastbeingthevery famousconferenceof 1947.

Theideaof organizingaroseatBrookhavenduringdiscussionson thephysicsof theAccu-mulatorRing for new SpallationNeutronSource(SNS)to bebuilt at OakRidge. This is a 1GeV protonring characterizedby a very high beamcurrentandthereforedependenton spacechargeeffects.We hada long historyof operationsof high intensityprotonsynchrotronsfromtheU.S.,Europe,andJapan.However, in termsof averagebeampower, they areall in therangeof a few to two hundredKW. Thenew generationof applicationsbothin thespallationneutronsourceand r -collider driversrequiresaveragebeampower from a few MW to 10 MW. Thispresentsanew challengein theprecisionof acceleratoranalysisandcontrolof beamlosses

Thedynamicsof beamsin circularaccelerators,whenspacecharge is important,is widelystudied,but thereare few experimentaldata. The theory is in evolution and the numericalsimulationstill needsasolidvalidation.Wefelt that,by inviting many of thekey playersof thisgame,discussingandcomparingexperimentalresults,theoriesandsimulationcodes,we couldgive an importantcontribution not only to theSNS,but to thefield in general.We alsohopedthattheWorkshopcouldgiveastartto new collaborations.

3.4.1 Workshop Lay-out

¿FromtheWorkshop,someanswerswe weretrying to find are:Whataretheexperimentalobservationsof high intensityeffects.Whatarethetheoreticalexplanationsandpredictions.Whatcomputersimulationcodesareavailable.Thefollowing kindly agreedto setupa ProgramCommittee:S.ChattopadhyayLBL, T-S.WangLANL, S-Y. LeeIndianaUniversity, A.U. Luccio,BNL

(vice-chair),D.K. Olsen,ORNL, M. ReiserUniversityof Maryland,W-T. WengBNL (chair).

Page 14: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

14 3. WORKSHOPREPORTS

Registeredparticipantswere57. They gave 14 plenarypapers+ 23 topical papers.TheWorkshoptook3 and1/2 days.

3.4.2 Plenary Sessions

In thefirst two dayswehadplenarypresentationsondifferenttopics,by thefollowing speakers:1. Review of experimentalresults:TomWangler(LosAlamos)andIngoHofmann(GSI)2. Review of the theory: BrunoZotter (CERN),Rick Baartman(TRIUMF), andS-Y Lee

(Indiana)3. Review of simulationcomputercodes:Shinji Machida(KEK), andChrisPrior (ARL)4. ExistingHigh IntensityRings:ChrisWarsop(ISIS),RobertMacek(PSR),ChuckAnken-

brandt(Fermi),andThomasRoser(AGS)5. New ProposedFacilities: ChrisPrior (ESS),Miloslav Popovic (MuonColliderDriver),

andBill Weng(SNS)

3.4.3 Working Groups

To helpworkshopdiscussionsandfocuson thepresentissuesfor thedesignof new highpowerfacilities,weassignedspecifictasksto thethreeWorkingGroups,chairedby

ObservationWG: RobertoCappi(CERN)TheoryWG: Rick Baartman(TRIUMF)SimulationWG: Alfredo Luccio (BNL)Contributedpaperswerepresentedduring Working Groupsessions.Thesepresentations

werelessformal thatin theplenarysessions,andservedasthebasisfor discussions.Questionsfor BeamObservationsGroupwere.(1) Whatarethewaysto observeemittance

growth, their reliability andprecision. (2) Whatarethe waysto observe particlelosses,theirreliability andprecision.(3) Observationandexperienceof particlelossesin existing facilities.(4) Suggestionof methodsto beadoptedfor high intensitysynchrotronsin emittanceandpar-ticle lossobservation. (5) What is thebeststrategy to designandplacecollimatorsin ringstoreducehalo?

Questionsfor TheoryGroup(1) Relationshipbetweensingleparticleandcoherentpictureof resonancesin synchrotrons.(2) Methodsandaccuracy of emittancegrowth andparticlelossescalculationby resonance

models.(3) Mechanismsof halogenerationin synchrotrons.(4) Methodsandaccuracy of emittancegrowth calculationby particle-coremodels.(5) How to minimizehalogenerationin synchrotrons.Questionsfor SimulationGroup(1) Characteristics,strengthandweaknessof existing6-D,space-chargedominatedtracking

codes.(2) What are the specificrecommendationsto improve them, algorithms,speed,conver-

gence,relevance,...?(3) How to validatea trackingcode,self-consistency, reliability, convergence,calibration

with observationsandothercodes.(4) Is it possibleto build acodeeverybodyagreesto use?All thepapersgivenwill bepublishedin abookby theAmericanInstituteof Physics.

Page 15: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

3.4. SPACE CHARGEPHYSICSIN HIGH INTENSITY HADRON RINGS 15

3.4.4 Resultsof the Workshop. Conclusions

TheWorkshopreachedits goalsto bringpeopletogetherto discuss.Thefield is in evolution,soit is hardto getfinal conclusions,or to agreeonfinal answeror establishedfacts.Thechairmenof theWorkingGroupstriedtogiveanswersto thespecificquestionsstatedabove,but in generalthoseanswerswerein turnquestionsandnew questionsweregeneratedateachstep.

One fact is clear, namely, from circular high intensity hadronacceleratorsthereare notenoughexperimentaldataon spacechargeeffects,andwhat is availableis sometimescontro-versial. TheoryandSimulationareacting in parallel sincetheoreticalwork generallyneedsnumericalsimulationto confirmresults.Simulationis complex andoftenvery computertimeintensive. So,oneshouldfind new waysto usecomputersto solve themin a reasonabletime.Validationof codesandtheoryby comparisonwith experimentaldatais avery importanteffort.

All thissuggeststhreemaindirectionsonwhich to move:Z Givemorefinancialsupportto dedicatedmachineexperiments.Z Acquirenew, fastercomputers(build arraysof PC’s?)Z Createmorecollaborationsto shareresultsandfindings.

Page 16: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4: ActivityReports

4.1 BeamDynamicsIssuesat MUSESProject of RIKEN RadioactiveIso-topeBeamFactory

Yuri BatyginA����-s�o1("��!�1(����B��*8�9(����"*po��;>���

RI BeamFactoryProjectOffice,RIKEN,2-1Hirosawa,Wako-shi,Saitama351-01,Japan

TakeshiKatayama��������s���6��!��%"<:���5�tu$5("9:`J:;�=�v��9���-s��7>��5`,��� Centerfor NuclearStudy,Schoolof Science,Universityof Tokyo, 3-2-1,Midoricho,Tanashi,Tokyo 188,Japan

In RIKEN, theRadioactive IsotopeBeamFactoryProjecthasbeenapprovedby the Gov-ernmentasa new stageof fundamentalresearchin heavy-ion physics. This project includesnew typesof facility to accelerateextremelyrareunstableheavy ionsupto energy of 1-3Gev/u.Extensiveuseof heavy ionsis assumedto bedonein thefollowing branchesof science:

- creationof new isotopes- studyof exotic nucleiandreactonsunducedby them- studyof nuclearstructure- developmentof new cancertreatment- ion implantationinto materialsto changematerialsproperties- diagnosticsof materialcomponents.

Existing acceleratorfacility in RIKEN consistsof heavy-ion linac for energy of 0.7 - 4MeV/u followedby Ring Cyclotronfor energy of 150-200MeV/u. Thefirst stageof thenewprojectassumesconstructionof two extracyclotrons(4-sectorIntermediateRingCyclotronand6-sectorSuperconductingRingCyclotron),with final energy of 400MeV/u. After accelerationin cascadeof cyclotrons,primaryheavy ion beaminteractswith a targetandis convertedintoradioactive isotope(RI) beamvia projectilefragmentationprocess.CreatedunstableparticlescomethroughRI separatorto be selectedfor further experimentalusage. Cyclotronfacilityas injector will be operatedin two modes,oneis CW modewith averagebeamcurrentof 1particle r A, andthesecondmodeis pulsemodewith peakcurrentof 100pr A andrepetitionrateof 1 kHz. Typical RI beamcharacteristicsareestimatedasfollows: theproductionrateis10w -10xpx particlespersecond,momentumspreadis y 0.5 %; the phasewidth relative to RFfrequency is 1 5 degrees;andthetransverseemittanceis 4.5 a mmmradin bothhorizontalandverticaldirections.Dueto largemomentumspreadof theRI beamaftertarget,beamhasto bedebunchedbeforeinjection into AccumulatorCoolerRing. For thatbeamis transportedfromthetarget to the injectionpoint alongthe lengthof 70 m. At theendpoint of transportline, adebunchersystemwith 8 MV voltagewill beinstalledto reducethemomentumspreadto 0.1%.

Thesecondstageof theprojectis MUSES(Multi UseExperimentalStoragerings)facility,which consistsof AccumulatorStorageRing (ACR), BoosterSynchrotronRing (BSR) withaninjectorelectronlinac andDoubleStorageRings(DSR).ACR worksfor accumulationandcooling of RI beamsand for atomic and molecularphysicsexperiments. BSR works only

16

Page 17: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.1. MUSESPROJECTOFRIKEN 17

for accelerationof ions andelectronbeams. DSR permitsvarioustypesof uniquecollidingexperiments.Dueto shortlife time of radioactive isotopes,themaindesignefforts arefocusedon accumulationandcollision of largestpossiblenumberof particleswith small emittancetoobtainhighvalueof luminosity.

4.1.1 Accumulator Cooler Ring

TheAccumulatorCoolerRing will beusedto providehigh intenseandquality RI beam.ACRservesasinjectorfor BoosterSynchrotronandindependentlyasanacceleratorfor nuclearandatomicphysicsexperiments.

ACR is a ring with circumferenceof 168 m, which consistsof two arc sectionsandtwolong straightsections.Both stochasticcoolingandelectroncoolingareexaminedto decreasephasespacevolumeof RI beam. It is turnedout, that for multi-turn injectionandfor typicalRI beamwith small numberof particlesandlarge valuesof beamemittanceandmomentumspread,stochasticcoolingis muchfaster, thanelectroncooling.Electroncoolerwith 3 m lengthprovidescooling time of 380 secfor zj{|F and0.42secfor

k f k~}, while the stochasticcooling

with 10kW andabandwidth of 2 GHzfeedbackamplifierprovides0.2secand5 mseccoolingtime, respectively. Meanwhile,utilizing of one-turninjection schemepermitsfasterelectroncooling due to dependenceof cooling time of beamemittanceas �~���8�8� 2���f>� k . Comparablestudyof one-turninjectionwith electroncoolingagainstmulti-turn injectionis carriedout [2].

Beamcooling is accompaniedwith particleaccumulationutilizing RF stackingtechnique.Injectedbeamis capturedinto bucket via applyingof RF voltage. RF operationfrequency ischangedadiabaticallyto shift thestackingorbit. After that theRF voltageis switchedoff andthebeamis releasedandremainsatthestackingorbit. Optimizationof initial momentumspreadandRFbucketheightin presenceof coolingforcesis madeto providehighstackingefficiency.AccumulatedRI beamis fastextractedfrom theACR andinjectedinto BoosterSynchrotron.Thefinal momentumspreadis lessthan0.15%andemittanceis 1 a mmmrad.

4.1.2 BoosterSynchrotron Ring

TheBoosterSynchrotronRing is usedexclusively for accelerationof ion andelectronbeams.The maximumacceleratingenergy is 3 GeV for proton,1.45 GeV/nucleonfor light ions ofq/A=1/2and800MeV/nucleonfor heavy ionsof q/A=1/3. Electronbeamis acceleratedup to2.5GeVfrom theinjectionenergy of 300MeV. Acceleratedion andelectronbeamswill befastextractedandinjectedinto theDoubleStorageRings(DSR)by oneturn injection. As anotheroperationmode,ion beamwill beslowly extractedfor theexperiments.Latticeof the BSR consistsof two arc sectionsandtwo long straightsections.Naturalchro-maticityof -8.670(horizontal)and-8.320(vertical)arecorrectedby two familiesof sextupoles.The normalizedfield strengthsof sextupolesrequiredto correctchromaticityare9.236m � fand-15.889m � f . Dynamicapertureis seriouslyaffectedby chromaticitycorrection. Multi-turn (10O ) trackingindicates,thatdynamicapertureof BSRis �,� = 125 a mmmradand ��� = 5a mm mrad.Furthertrackingis requiredto definelimits of dynamicalapertureandto estimatethetolerablelevel of misalignmentin thering.

Page 18: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

18 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

Table4.1: Parametersof proposedRIKEN DoubleStorageRingcollider.

Circumference 258mBeamEnergy

proton(GeV) 3.55ion (Z/A=0.5),Gev/nucleon 1.45ion (Z/A = 0.387),Gev/nucleon 1.00

Max B � 14.6TmTransition�

electron 4.819ion 5.236

Numberof ion bunches 50-100Mergingangle,2� 10�Betatrontunevalue( N\�%� H N\� )

electron 4.793/7.687ion 6.668/5.661

Betafunctionat InteractionPoint( b��� H b��� , m) 0.1/0.1Beamsizesat interactionpoint ( ��� H ��� H ��� , mm) 0.4/0.4/100

4.1.3 DoubleStorageRing

DoubleStorageRings(DSR) will be usedfor variousexperimentsof collision or merging ofradio-isotopebeamswith ions,electronbeamsandX-raysproducedby anundulator. DSRcon-sistsof verticallystackedtwo ringsof similarspecification(seeTable1). Eachlatticestructuretakesa form of a racetrackto accommodatetwo long straightsections.Theexperimentswillbeperformedat two crossingpoints. Oneis for collision of RI beamwith electronbeamwithcrossingangleof 20mrad.Anotheris for mergingof ion beamswith angleof 170mrad.To per-form theseexperimentswith highluminosity, electronbeamhastwo differentoperationmodes.Oneis usedfor collisionwith ion beam.In thiscase,thesizeof electronbeamatcollisionpointhasto beequalto thesizeof ion beam.It is attainedutilizing smallvalueof b functionin thecollisionpointandratherlargevalueof electronbeamemittance.Electronbeamwith emittanceof 10� z m c radis preparedfor thismode.Anothermodeemployselectronbeamfor productionof highbrilliant X-ray. For thismodeelectronbeamwith emittanceof 10�-� m c radis provided.

Theelectron-RIbeamcollision is adirectway to determinethechargeandcurrentdistribu-tion in neutronor proton-richradioactive nuclei. To keepa sufficiently long Toucheklifetime,an RF voltageof 2 MV is appliedto electronbeam. The numberof storedelectronsis esti-matedto be

W T���c�e%M x k particles,which is limited by thelongitudinalcoupled-bunchinstability.Luminosityof electron-ioncollisionasa functionof beam-beamparameteris:

[ � � �$���p�������b �J�$  gj¡¢£n G¥¤D¦/§©¨ X cªe(M x«� gm¡¢£n �­¬¯®8¬ ¦8°� e±,²~³u³~´ k µwhereG~¶�·>� = 0.005is thetypicalmaximumvalueof beam-beamparameterin hadroncollidersand � ¬�®8¬ ¦8°� ¨¸���>�¹�'¨ e%M w � e(M x k is a total numberof storedions. Therefore,the maximumachievablevalueof luminosityis

[;¤D¦/§©¨ e%M f x e±J²¥³7³~´ k T

Page 19: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.1. MUSESPROJECTOFRIKEN 19

Beam-beaminstability is usuallyattributedto excitationof setof nonlinearresonanceislands,which, being overlapped,createstochasticparticle motion. Another factor in instability ofcollidedparticlesis thenoisein beam-beaminteraction.Randomfluctuationsin the oppositebeamsize ��º�¨»��� g e y½¼¿¾(¼1º H W n , where¼ is anoiseamplitude,À is a turnnumber, and ¼�º is auniformrandomfunctionwith unit amplitude,resultin beamemittancegrowth [3]��Á�J� ¨Ã e0ĽŠÀƵwherediffusioncoefficient D is a functionof thebeam-beamparameter, noiseamplitude,andratioof ion beamsize, Ç , to electronbeamsize,

W � :Å ¨ g a G�¼ n k g ÇW � n O TElectroncooling is anticipatedto bea way to suppressbeam-beaminstability. Taking theex-pectednumberof dampingturnsto cool thebeamas �¹È�·>¶   ¨ W c½e(M w , which correspondstocoolingtimeof 20sec,andtheexpectednoiseamplitude¼d¨ UÉcÊe%M � f , themaximumvalueofbeam-beamparameteris

G~¤D¦/§Ë¨ eaI¼Ì W�¹È>·�¶   ¨ M�T�M�e(�ÍT

Utilizing thebeamcoolingcanresultin increasingof luminosityat leastby a factorof 4.Mergingbeamcollisionsis anew techniquefor studyof nuclearfusionprocesses.In merg-

ing collisionstwo comoving beamsintersecteachotheratsmallangleW �Ψ e(M � to providelow

collisionenergy just above theCoulombbarrierthreshold.Luminosityof merging beam-beamcollisionsis givenby expression:

[Ϩ � �J���>� x � kÐ aÑ���~��� ³~Ò�± � ÓÔÔÕe � b k ³~Ò�± k �e0Ä g×ÖÙØ�Ú �|��� H ��� n kÛ¨ e�T W cÊe%M�Ü ���>� x � k

e±,²~³7³~´ k TIn merging collisionsachievablevalueof luminosity is several orderof magnitudelessthanthat in head-oncollisions,becausecolliding beamsarealmostparallelto eachother. Analysisshows, that in merging collisionsbeam-beameffectsimposelessseverelimitation on intensityof collidedbeamsthanthatof incoherentspacechargeeffect. Assuming,thebeamintensityislimited by incoherentspacechargeeffect, themaximumnumberof storedionsis � x ¨Ý� k ¨W cÞe(M x«ß g ¡ H ¢ k$n , andmaximumavailableluminosityis

[;¤D¦/§à¨ W T Ð cªe(M k w g ¡á k n k e±J²¥³0³¥´ k TAnotherplanningexperimentis collision of RI beamswith high brilliant X-raysgeneratedbyan undulator. This experimentis aimedto be usedfor precisemeasurementof isotopeshiftandhyperfinestructurein atomictransitionsof highly-chargedradioactive isotopes.TheX-rayenergy of 30-800eV is requiredto excite the transitionfor elementsof Z = 40 - 92. In orderto resolve theisotopeandthehyperfinestructurein thetransition,theenergy resolutionof theX-ray shouldbebetterthan

W câe(M � O with largestpossiblephotonflux. Undulatorof 6 m lengthwith theperiodof 3 cm,numberof periods200,gapwidth 2.9cmandpoletip field of 1.3T isplacedin dispersionfreesectionof thering togetherwith smallcompensators.ExtractedX-ray

Page 20: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

20 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

is injectedinto anotherring to collidewith storedRI beam.Themaximumphotonflux densityis estimatedto be

e(M x«� photons/secmradk

0.1b.w.Additionalimportantapplicationof DoubleStorageRingisahightemperatureplasmatarget

physicsstudyfor Heavy Ion Fusion.HIF experimentswill beperformedwithk f k } � O>ã ion beam

with energy 150MeV/u, numberof ionsW c½e(M xpx with pulsewidth 20 nsec.Basicstudiesof

high temperatureplasmatargetphysicswill bedoneup to theplasmatemperature10 - 50 eVwith symmetricbeamradiationof thetarget.Studyof spacechargeeffectsin RF linacandringareconducted.

FurtherinformationaboutRIKEN RI BeamFactoryProjectcanbefoundin WWW page�����!�*),+-+�.�.�.�p������&0p�1(����"'8o��;,���1+�������&�+�%"�#��!B0����!694.

References

[1] T.Katayama,Y.Batygin, N.Inabe, K.Ohtomo, T.Ohkawa, M.Takanaka,M.Wakasugi,S.Watanabe,Y.Yano,K.Yoshida,J.Xia,Y.RaoandY.Yuan,NuclearPhysicsA626(1997),545-560.

[2] I.Meshkov, E.Syresin,T.KatayamaandY.Yano,RIKEN AF-AC-8,1998.

[3] Y.BatyginandT.Katayama,NIM A, Vol. 404(1998),1-16.

4.2 Activity in Padova University (PhysicsDepartment) and at LegnaroNational Laboratory–INFN–Legnaro (Padova) on theory of beamsand applications

M. Pusterla��=<:�������4!�!����#0Ù%"�&�"*Ù(�

Dipartimentodi FisicaGalileoGalilei Universita di PadovaIstitutoNazionaledi FisicaNucleare(INFN) Sezionedi PadovaVia Marzolo8 Padova35131ITALY�����!�*),+-+�.�.�.�/��#0$%"�&�"*$(�1+�2R��= :�������4���+�.���4-5-�(6��78�-��6<4

Theresearchgroupin acceleratorphysicsandbeamdynamicsin PadovaUniversity(PhysicsDepartmentandINFN) hasmainly focussedits interestson the “QuantumAspectsof BeamDynamicsof spin-xk charged-particles(protons,antiprotons,electrons,andpositrons)”. Morespecificallywe have dealtwith thederivationof thecanonicalbeammapsfrom theDirac for-mulaefor spin-xk particles(in collaborationwith M. Conte,INFN-Genova andR. Jagannathan,& S.A. Khan(now atPadova),IMSC, Madras,India[1, 2]).

We alsoworkedon thedefinitionof theStern-Gerlachforceat a relativistic energy andthestudyof its usefor obtaininga polarizedbeamfrom an unpolarizedone by repeatedStern-Gerlachkicks on theparticlesis a storagering. Thesekicks maybeeitherlongitudinal(alongtheparticletrajectory)or transversal[3, 4].

ThebeamphysicsactivitiesattheLegnaroNationalLaboratoryismainlyaddressedtoheavyion beamstransportandacceleration,strictly relatedto the acceleratorsdevelopedin the lab-oratory. Moreover in the last yearstheoreticalstudieshave beencarriedout on space-chargedominatedbeams,addressedto two specificproblems: the possibility of crystalizingan ion

Page 21: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.3. LHC COLLECTIVE EFFECTS 21

beamin a storagering andthestudyof theorigin of smallbeamlossesin a high intensitypro-ton linac (beamhalo formation). The latter is a centralpoint of the high intensityacceleratordevelopmentin which LNL is involved, togetherwith otherINFN structureslike LNS (Cata-nia), INFN-Groupsof Bologna,Napoli, Bari, Milano andGenova, andin closecontactswithotherinternationalinstitutionslikeCEA in France.

First resultsfor the beamhalo formation studiesare being obtainedby applying to thisproblemtheFrequency Mapanalysistechnique,alreadyusedin celestialmechanicsandsingleparticleacceleratorphysics.

“Halo problem”and“Stern-Gerlach”kicks areundercontinuousstudyby detailedsimula-tions.

References

[1] M. Conte,R. Jagannathan,S.A. KhanandM. Pusterla,Part. Accel.56 (1996)99.

[2] M. Conte,R. Jagannathan,S.A.KhanandM. Pusterla,“A quantummechanicalformalismfor studyingthe transportof Dirac particlebeamsthroughmagneticoptical elementsinaccelerators”,

%"��������������<���".

[3] M. ConteandM. Pusterla,Il NuovoCimentoA 1031087.

[4] M. Conte,Y. Onel,A. Penzo,A. Pisent,M. PusterlaandR. Rossmanith,Thespin-splitterconcept,å "�������"���4çæ����1����� : INFN/TC-93/04(INFN, Genova,1993).

4.3 LHC CollectiveEffects

F. Ruggiero è ����"95���:�5!�;/æ�=�o�o1��!������5��!��"*J5(� CERN

In connectionwith electron-cloudinducedheatingof the LHC beamscreen,an intensiveresearchprogramhasbeensetupat CERNto measuretherelevantphysicalquantities,suchasphotonreflectivity, photoelectronandsecondaryelectronyield, to validateanalyticestimatesand simulationresults,and to proposeeffective remedies:a fairly completeaccountof thecontributionsto this ‘crashprogram’canbefoundin theWorld-WideWebpage�����!�*),+-+�.�.�.1:�4����*J5�����"*J5��1+-5!��4�4���5��9(q���+���4���5��-����"�v�5�4-��=�#�+

.A simpleandreliabletechnique,basedon amplitudemodulationof the input signal,has

beendevelopedto detectelectronicallythe onsetof multipactingin a resonantcoaxialcavity.Theresultsobtainedduringcoldtestsin asuperconductingmagnetshow thattheelectroncloudbuild-upisnotsuppressedbyastrongdipolefield,whileaweaksolenoidfieldof about50Gaussis usuallysufficient to stopthemultipacting.A substantialdecreaseof themultipactingthresh-old is observedfor adipolefield intensitysuchthattheelectroncyclotronfrequency is equaltotheresonantfrequency of thecoaxialcavity.

Computercodeshave beendeveloped,debuggedandusedto predictthe heatload on theLHC beamscreenunderseveral conditionsandthe rise time of a multi-bunchinstability as-sociatedwith the electroncloud wakefield. The resultsare in agreementwith quasi-analyticestimatesof the critical secondary-emissionyield, andindicatethat doublingthe LHC bunchspacingwould be an effective back-upsolution. Alternative cures,including low-emissivitycoatings,clearingelectrodes,andanincreasedsurfaceroughness,areunderstudytogetherwiththeir possibleimpacton theimpedancebudget.Thelatter is beingrevisedalsoin view of new

Page 22: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

22 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

analyticestimatesof the interferenceamongpumpingslotsandof ongoingmeasurementsofthekicker impedance.

4.4 BeamDynamicsActivities at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Source

Liu Lin4�%=���"9:;,4�"14-:;�A��

A.L.XavierJr.B���q9��!�-��"9:`J4�"14-:`/A��

LNLSC.P.619213083-970Campinas,SP,Brazil

Recentbeamdynamicsactivities at the Brazilian SynchrotronLight Source(LNLS) aremainly directedto improve theelectronstoragering performanceparameters:designof a syn-chrotronboosterto increasethe injectionenergy, improvementin thebeamorbit stability andopticscalibration.In additionwehavealsomeasuredthelinearcouplingcoefficientby analyz-ing thetransversebeamprofilenearthedifferencecouplingresonance.

4.4.1 Designof a synchrotron booster

The electronstoragering at LNLS operatespresentlyat 1.37 GeV with a 120 MeV injectorlinac. Thestoragering hasbeenoperatingroutinelywith userssinceJuly 1997andits perfor-manceparametershave improvedsteadilyduringthisfirst yearof regularoperation,reachingamaximumstoredcurrentof 170mA at operatingenergy with 11 hourslifetime. Theseparam-etersalreadyexceedthosespecifiedduring design. The needfor an increasein the injectionenergy arosewith the demandfor the installationof insertiondevices. The presentinjectionat low energy doesnot allow thesedevicesto be installedsincethe reductionin the verticalacceptanceof the ring would decreasethe injection efficiency. Considerationson the costoftheproject,injectionandrampingefficiency andphysicalspaceavailableto install theboosterwith minimummodificationsto thestoragering have leadus to thechoiceof an intermediateenergy booster(500MeV) placedinsidethestoragering. In addition,theboosterwill bede-signedto operatewith long rampingcyclesallowing theuseof conventionalvacuumchambersandpowersupplytopologiesalreadydevelopedatLNLS for thestoragering. Theadventof theboosterwill alsoprovide moreopportunitiesfor machineexperimentssinceit will beusedforacceleratorphysicsstudieswhennot usedasinjector.

4.4.2 Impr ovementof the orbit stability

In orderimprove the stability andreproducibilityof the x-ray beampositiondeliveredto theuserswearepresentlyreviewing thevastnumberof topicsrelatedto thesubject,appliedto ourspecificcase,suchas: orbit stability requirements,techniquesto identify undesirablesourcesof beammotion,capabilitiesof orbit monitoringequipmentat LNLS (e.g. positionmeasure-mentdependenceonbeamcurrent),parametersfor automaticorbit correction,relationbetweenbeamstabilityat themonitorsandat thesourcepoints,etc.Effortsmadeup to now includetheincreasein thenumberof verticalcorrectorsin ring (whichwerealreadyavailable,but werenotpowered),increasein theresolutionof theappliedcorrections,stabilizationof themagnetstem-perature,installationof a x-ray beampositionmonitor, andexperimentswith theusersduringspecialsessionsdedicatedto verify theorbit correctionsystemperformancefor variousscenar-ios. Theorbit repeatabilityfrom fill to fill hasalreadyimprovedfrom about80 r m to about5

Page 23: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.4. BRAZILIAN SYNCHROTRON LIGHT SOURCE 23

r m. Oncethemain limitationsof thepresentsystemareidentified,furtherupgradeplanswillbeproposed.

4.4.3 Measurementof the linear coupling coefficientby analysisof the transversebeamprofile

Duringthemachinestudytimesreservedfor theacceleratorgroupatLNLS, wehaveperformedseveralexperimentswith linearlycoupledtransversebeamsin thevicinity of a differencereso-nance[1] é�� � é(�ਠK excitedbyskew quadrupoles.Thisis thecouplingresonanceclosestto ourstandardoperatingpoint é��ê¨ X T W � , é��\¨ W Tëe�� . Closeto this resonantcondition,thedynamicsof linearcouplingcanbedescribed[1] by asinglecomplex parameter:thecouplingcoefficientì . Thesestudies[2] consistedin observingthe time evolution of the transversebeamprofilefor a few milliseconds(a time short if comparedto the synchrotrondampingtime, but longcomparedto the betatronoscillationperiod)after exciting the beamwith a fast(few hundredns)horizontalkick. Theacquiredimageis a projectionontothexy planeof a phase-spacedis-tribution functionintegratedovera very largenumberof turns.Many geometriccharacteristicsof thephasespaceorbitsappearin thetime averagedprofile (in particularthetransversebeamprofileborder)whichenabledthedevelopmentof new experimentalmethod[3] to measuresev-eralaspectsof thisphasespacegeometryprovidedthetunedifferenceis closeto theresonance. Hamiltonianformalism[1] appliedto the resonanceregion of interestprovidesa transversemapfrom which thebeamprofilecontourcanbeextracted.Thereverseprocessallows thede-terminationof both íݨ¸î ì�ï and ð¹î ì�ï giventhebeamcontourby a least-squareminimization.Thisprocedurewasthenappliedtoexperimentallyobtainedcontourswhichyieldsexperimentalestimatesof themodulusandphaseof ì T

A pair of skew quadrupoleswasinstalledin oneof the long straightsectionsandusedtodrivethecouplingresonance.Oneof theinjectionkickerswasusedto exciteacoherentbetatronoscillationand the subsequentevolution of the transversebeamprofile wasobserved with asynchrotronradiationmonitor. The beamenergy was600 MeV andthe currenta few dozenmilliamperesto avoid collective effects. We usedtwo differentmodesof operationduringtheexperiments:thestandardopticsandthe low verticalbetaoptics. In thefirst operationmode,the horizontalandverticalbetatronphaseadvancesfrom oneskew quadrupoleto the otherissmall( b�� and b�� largein thesection).Also they aresymmetricallyinstalledwith respectto thestraightsectioncentersothatthevalueof ñ ì ñ and

Ø�òJó9g ì n doesnotchangefrom onequadrupoleto theother(measurementsmadewith quadrupolepoweredin series).In thestandardmodeasignificantagreementbetweenthetheoreticalandexperimentalvalues(obtainedfromtheprofileborderanalysis)of ñ ì ñ wasobserved (all the resultsheredescribedagreewithin 15 %). Alsoa phasedifferencecloseto a wasmeasuredwhenthecurrentin thequadrupoleswasinverted(whichmakes ìdô � ì accordingto thetheory).For thelow betaoptics,in thestraightsectioncontainingthepair of skew quadrupolesthereis a largebetatronphaseadvancefrom oneskewquadrupoleto the otherdueto the smallnessof the vertical betatronfunction (the horizontalphasejump is kept small) which allows the observation of large phasejumps in ì . For thiscase,eachskew quadrupolewaspoweredindependentlyandwe observed that ñ ì ñ is largelyinsensitive to thebetatronphaseadvancefrom onequadrupoleto theotherwhich correspondsto thetheoreticalprediction.Thedeterminedvaluesof ñ ì ñ reasonablyagreewith thetheoreticalcalculations.As eachquadrupoleis individually powered,thereis a phasejump which causesa significantchangein the beamprofile. The resultingcalculatedchangein the phaseof thecouplingcoefficientalsoagreewith theexperimentallydeterminedvalues.

Page 24: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

24 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

Thereforewe have shown that this new experimentalmethod(basedon the beamprofileborderanalysis)givesusefulinformationon thephase-spacepropertiesof thebeamdescribedby thecomplex parameterì . However themethodcannot beblindly appliedsinceoneshouldcarefullychoosetheresonanceregion (to guaranteeclosenessto resonanceandvalidity of thetheory)aswell asasuitablevaluefor thekickerstrength.If thekick amplitudeisverylargeothernon-linearphenomenamayappearandthe linear theorydoesnot apply; if thekicker strengthis small,thefinite beamsizemaysmearout thebeamprofile soasto renderthedeterminationof ì very imprecise.Within theselimits, however, themethodgivesvaluesfor ñ ì ñ and

Ø�òJó1g ì nin goodagreementwith theoreticalestimatesaswell aswith the resultsof moreconventionalmeasuringtechniques.

4.4.4 Optics Calibration of the LNLS StorageRing Via ResponseMatrix Theory.

An effort hasbeendedicatedto thedevelopmentof aspecialprocedurefor calibratingtheLNLSstorageringusingtheresponsematrixformalism.Theresponsematrixtheorycorrelatestheam-plitudeobservedin agivenbeampositionmonitor õÛ��� with theintensityof agivenkicker õ÷öÙøby therelation õÉ���Ѩ K�Å£ù ��ú øjõ÷öÙø T Theresponsematrix

ù �¯ú ø is theinput for theopticscalibra-tion by aninverseprocedure[4]. It consistsin minimizingafigure-of-meritfunction û k thatfitsthecalculated

ù ��ú ø to theexperimentallydetermined üù ��ú ø T Thefirst stepis thedevelopmentof aspecialsoftwareusingMAD [5] which adjustsan“experimental” üù ��ú ø (that is, a responsema-trix calculatedby MAD with a known magneticlattice). Theprogramsimply triesto re-obtainthe initial lattice, thusconfirmingwhatever introducederrors. The secondstepwould be thecalibrationitself, i. e., the minimizationof û k accordingto the experimentalmatrix. We arenow (step1) testingseveralproceduresfor thecalculationof ý ù �¯ú ø (thegradientof

ù ��ú ø in theparameterspace)requiredfor thefitting procedure,admittingerrorsin thequadrupolefieldsandin dipolefieldsof quadrupolemagnets.We planto testthecalibrationto severalenergy ranges(from theinjectionenergy of 120MeV to 1.37GeV).

References

[1] G. Guignard,CERN78-11(1978).

[2] Liu Lin, ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter,15 (1997).

[3] P. F. Tavares,A. L. Xavier Jr., Liu Lin, L. JahnelandR. H. Farias,Measurementof themodulusand phaseof the linear couplingcoefficient by analysisof the transversebeamprofile,submittedto Phys.Rev. SpecialTopics:AcceleratorsandBeams.

[4] J. Safranek,Proceedingof the97EPAC.

[5] F. ChristophIselin,J. Niederer, TheMadprogram7.2,CERN88-38(1988).

4.5 NewDivision of Accelerator and BeamSciencein the Atomic EnergySocietyof Japan

MitsuruUesaka=���:������!�����������/�*�=�v������-s��;>��5`>���

NuclearEngineeringResearchLaboratoryUniversityof Tokyo

Page 25: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.5. ACCELERATORAND BEAM SCIENCEIN THEATOMIC ENERGYSOCIETYOFJAPAN25

On behalfof thechiefpromoter, Prof. M. Matoba(KyushuUniversity, Japan),I would liketo sendyou the informationaboutthe new division of AcceleratorandBeamSciencein theAtomic Energy Societyof Japan.

The division is plannedto be establishedthis Septemberat the autumntopical meetingof the societyheld at Fukui Institute of Technology, Japan,andthe openingceremony is tobe held, too. Tentetive administrationand scopesare written in the following. One of theimportantmissionsof thesocietyis radiationsourceandapplication.Most researchactivitieson acceleratorandbeamsciencearerelatedandbasedon nucleartechnology. Unfortunately,theatmospheresurroundingnucleartechnologydoesnot look warmdueto severalunpleasantnuclearaffairs in theworld. Thenew division is expectedto bea key to stimulatethenuclearsocietyandmake it moreattractive to academics,industriesandpublics.

Divisionof AcceleratorandBeamSciencein theAtomic Energy Societyof Japan

1. GeneralAffairs

Public information/University matters/Laboratorymatters/Industrymatters/Educationalprogram(summeror winterschool).

2. Accessmentandresearch

1). Energy production2). Nuclearwasteprocessingby spallation3). Targetsystem,Reactorcharacteristics4). Radiationshielding5). Measurementandcontrol of subcriticalreactor6). Analysis of materialand surface7). Micromachining8). Collaborative operationofacademicandindustrialorganization9). Nondestructivetesting10). Environmentandaccel-erator11). Acceleratorfor medicaluse12). Acceleratorfor cancertherapy 13). Synchrotronlight source14). Freeelectronlaser, Opticalquantumscience15). Atomic physics,Atomicdataandaccelerator16). ElectronlinearacceleratorandElectrostaticaccelerator17). Cy-clotronandsynchrotron18). Superlarge-sizedaccelerator19). New principleof acceleration20). Acceleratortechnology(ion source,beamtransportation)21). Relatedtechnologies(su-perconductivity, ultra low temperature,high frequency, laser)22). Radiationdiagnosis23).Systemscontrol,operationandmanagement.24). Safetytechnology. 25). Big projects.

3. Examplesof researchfieldsto beincluded

(1) Acceleratorandtechnologyof beamacceleration.

(a). Methodologyandtechnologyof acceleration:Beamphysics,Beamengineering,Newprinciple of accelerationNon-linearbeamdynamics,Electronaccelerator, Electrostaticac-celerator, Cyclotron,Synchrotron,Storagering etc. (b). Beamtechnology:Beamtransporta-tion, Beamcontrol, Beamcooling, Magnetdesign,Componenttechnology, Power source,Beamformation,Micro beam,Beammonitor, Beamdiagnosisetc. (c). Technologyof ionandelectronsources:Ion source,Electron(Positron)source,Secondarybeam,Non-chargedparticlebeam,Polarlizedparticlebeam,RI beam.(d). Technologyof SystemandControl:Shieldingdesign, Acceleratordesign,Mechanicaldesign,Componentcontrolingsystem,Constructionof accelerator, Operatingmanagement,Saftysystem,Acceleratorfor medicalcare,Synchrotronlight source,Freeelectronlaser, Acceleratorfacility complex.

(2) Applicationof beam

Page 26: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

26 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

(a). Energy andresource:Acceleratorreactor, Spallation,AcceleratorBreeder, Intenseneu-tron flux, Muonbeam,Inlerial confinementfusion,MHD electricitygenerationof, Develop-mentof material.(b). Advancedanalysis:Microanalysis,PIXE, Micro beam,Chronologicalmeasurement,Beamexperimenttechnique,Measuringdevices,Applicationof neutron,Ap-plicationof RI beam.(c). Advancedmanufacturing:Beam-irradiatedeffect, Surfaceanaly-sis, Changingquality, Characterization,Lithography, Micro-machining. (d). Medical care,BiotechnologyandEnvironment:Cancertherapy, Diagnosis,CT, Isotopeproduction,BNCT,Nuclearchemistry, Beam-bio-interaction,Biotechnology, Environmentalprotection,WastegastreatmentWastefluid treatment. Plasticsolidification. (e). Fundamentalscienceanddata:Nuclearphysics,Elementaryparticlephysics,Physicsof matter, Spacescience,Geo-physics,Archaeology, Generalfundamentalscience,Opticalquantumscience,Coolneutron,Beamplasma,Nucleartransformation, Low energy, Neutrondata,Electrondata,Reactorphysicsdata,Middle or high energy, Super-high energy, Nucleardatafor medicalcareandspacescience,Systemdata,Nuclearenergy data.

(3) Basicbeamtechnology

(a). InformationandDataaboutnucleus,atomandmolecule:Nucleusdata,Dataof atomand molecule,Data of energy loss, Data of radioactivation, Integrateddata,Databaseforshielding,Charge transformation,Laser-beaminteraction.(b). Diagnosisanddataprocess-ing: Radiationdiagnosis,Multi-dimensionaldataprocessing,Dataanalysisandprocessing,Sensoranddetectiondevice, Electronics,Signalprocessing.(c). Technologyof target andnuclearheat:Targettechnology, Criticalnuclearthermaldesign,Neutralbeamheating,Largeaperturedion source.(d). Methodof controlandintelligentsupport:Theoryof control,Highspeedcontrol, Robot, Intelligent support. (e). New device: Superconductivity, Ultra lowtemperature,High voltage,High frequency, Ultra highvacuum,Laser, Neutronguide,Mirrortechnology, X-ray focusing.

4.6 Accelerator PhysicsActivities in Spain

A. Faus-Golfe þ "�o���4���:` è ��=9:�v!ÿ���4�&��!��=-q�>��: IFICInstitutodeFısicaCorpuscularUniversityof Valencia

R.Pascual����:�5(=���4����&����u>��:

IFAEInstitutodeFısicadeAltasEnergıasUniversityAutonomaof Barcelona

Although TheoreticalandParticle ExperimentalPhysicshave becomematuresubjectsinSpain,AcceleratorPhysicsis in a gestationalperiodandthe birth of the first real installationdoesnot seemimminent.

Currentlythemostimportantandpromisingactivity is at theSynchrotronLight Laboratory(LLS) in Barcelona.In this laboratorya youngteamof thirteenpeoplearedevelopinga thirdgenerationsynchrotronradiationsource.

Besidesthis, therearesmallgroupsin someuniversitiesandresearchinstitutes,mainly inMadrid and Valencia,collaboratingwith CERN colleagueson specificaspectsof the LargeHadronCollider.

Page 27: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.6. ACCELERATOR PHYSICSACTIVITIES IN SPAIN 27

4.6.1 Synchrotron Light Laboratory of Barcelona

In July1992aCommitteewascreatedto studythefeasibilityof aSynchrotronLight SourceinBarcelonato beusedby Spanishandusersin south-westernEurope.Thecommitteeproduceda report demonstratingthat suchSpaincould afford an installationprovided that staff wereadequatelytrained. Moreover it was the mostsuitabletype of installation,both for Spanishscientistsandindustries.

In February1993theprojectwasapprovedat the level of theregionalgovernmentof Cat-aloniaandthe SteeringCommitteewascreatedat the sametime that the SpanishministerofEducationandScienceexpressedits interestin participatingin theproject.An AdvisoryCom-mitteeat Internationallevel recommendedthat a directorof the projectshouldbe found andproposedsamenames.Oneof them,Dr. J.Bordaswasappointedto theposition.

At thebeginningof 1994,a teamof 12postgraduateor postdoctoralscientistswereselectedto composea task force to be trainedin the differentfields of acceleratorsand synchrotronlight sources.Sincethenthey have beenworking underthedirectionof Dr. Bordasin ordertoanalysethe characteristicsof the mostsuitablesourcefor the usersandto preparea detailedDesignStudy. TheCentralandRegionalgovernmentswantedthis to befinishedat theendof1997. Thestudyhasindeedbeencompletedandthefinal approval by bothadministrationsisexpectedbeforetheendof 1998.

Thesolutionproposedto satisfythe requirementsof Spanishusersis a SL sourcecapableof delivering useful light over a rangeof photonenergiesexceeding25 keV. In addition, thesourcehasbeamlifetimesin excessof 24 hours,deliverslow emittance(8.5nm.rad)andhasasmall(by currentstandards)acceleratorcircumference(250m). This canbeachievedwith theconstructionof a 2.5 GeV acceleratorbasedon a Triple BendAchromatlattice. Thetechnicalfeasibility of sucha facility hasbeenthroughlycheckedout andits engineeringrequirementscarefullyevaluated.Sucha machineprovidesup to 10 freestraightsections(7 m long) for thepossibleinclusionof readilyupgradableinsertiondevicesaswell asup to 24 bendingmagnetsthatcanactasoptimisedSL sources.

On the otherhand,the LLS lattice allows for many future upgrades(e.g.,energy, exoticinsertiondevices, useof superconductingmagnetsand further improvementsin emittance).Theseupgrades,if and when needed,could be addedwith comparatively modestadditionalinvestmentandwithoutadverseeffectson theoperationof thefacility.

Naturally, theLLS wouldalsoprovideabaseof technicalexpertisein theareaof acceleratortechnologyandits exploitationthat is currentlylackingin Spain.This would make it easiertocreatea R&D andcommercialopportunitiesfor Spanishindustrieswhoseinvolvementin theconstructionwill benecessary. In factthis effecthasalreadyoccurred,albeitata modestlevel,duringthecourseof thisdesignstudy. Thetestof afirst dipoleprototype,with a field gradient,is expectedto startin aboutSeptember1998.

In addition,given the interdisciplinarynatureof SL facilities andin line with the currentstudiesin similar installationselsewhere,theLLS would provide a very fertile groundfor thedevelopmentof futuregenerationsof Spanishscientists,engineersandtechnologists.

4.6.2 Other activities

To ourknowledgethereareessentiallytwo activities relatedto thedesignof theLHC. A groupatCIEMAT in Madrid is collaboratingin thestudyof thetrainingof LHC sextupolecorrectorsusingsuperconductingcoils. The secondone is the collaborationof the IFIC, University of

Page 28: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

28 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

Valencia,in the feasibility studyof a high-betainsertionopticsfor theTOTEM experimentattheLHC.

Elsewhere,othergroupsareworking in moregeneraltheoreticaltopics,likeFokkerPlanckequationsandsymplecticintegrators,thatcouldbeappliedto acceleratorphysics.

You canfind moredetailsaboutthesesmall-scaleactivities dispersedin theproceedingsoftheEPAC 98.

4.7 Activities with SAD (StrategicAccelerator Design)in KEK

K. Hirata � ���������<���������������������K. Oide � �#��!��������q���B�/���������� KEK

SAD (Strategic AcceleratorDesign)is acomputerprogramcomplex for acceleratordesign.It hasbeendevelopedin KEK since1986.Moreandmorefunctionsarebeingadded.SAD hasprovento bepowerful andusefulin designs,simulations,commissioning,andimprovementofTRISTAN, KEKB, FFTB,ATF, JLC,NLC, JHFandothers.

SAD hasahomepage:�-�-�!�*),+�+�.�.�.�v���5�5�v��!��������s08������,���1+�� þ�� +-:!��#0/����694In KEK, from 7 to 9 July 1998,thereheld the first workshopon SAD. The purposewas

threefold:1) review thepresentfeatureof SAD which hasbeencontinuouslygrowing andhasundergoneseveralmetamorphosessothatthewholestructureof SAD is now difficult to see.2)think of thefutureof SAD andactivitiesassociatedwith SAD and3) preparea referencebookwhichonecanquotein papers.

4.7.1 History of SAD

First, let usbriefly review thehistoricaldevelopmentof SAD.

1986: A projectwasstartedby K. Hirata,S.Kamada,K. Oide,N. Yamamoto,andK. Yokoyato developea new codefor acceleratordesign.

1987: The first versionof the new coderan on HITAC, with Lie methods,6D tracking,andemittancecalculation[1] with beammatrix,underMAIN level.

1988: An opticsmatchingcodeFFSwasinstalled.Appliedfor NLC/FFTBfinal focussystem[2]atSLACVM. Thename“SAD” wasestablished[3].

1989: FFSwasmodifiedto designa periodicoptics. The initial versionof KEKB ring wasdesignedwith SAD.

1990: FFSwasextendedto x-y coupledopticswith solenoid.FFS/CORorbit correctionsystemwasdeveloped.

1992: A spincalculationSODOMwasfirst developedandlinkedwith SAD.

1993: Ahsadworkstationsstartedwith four HP735/755sto separateSAD from HITAC.

Page 29: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.7. ACTIVITIES WITH SAD IN KEK 29

1994: Mathematica-stylefunctionswereintroducedto FFS.TRISTAN startedto useSAD forregularoperation.

1995: Acsadserver startedwith DEC8000(7 CPUs). Taylor map,beam-beamwaslinked toSAD.

1996: EPICSwasfirst linkedto SAD for KEKB control. Parallelprocessingwasextensivelyusedin trackingandopticsmatching.

1997: PythonandTkinter wereembeddedin SAD/FFS.A few GUI librarieswasbuilt withthem.Acsadwasupgradedto 10CPUs.

1998: SAD/KBFramehasbeenappliedfor commissioningof KEKB Linac.

4.7.2 The First SAD Workshop

Theworkshopwasorganizedasfollows.

Organizingcommittee S.Kurokawa(chairman),S.Matsumoto,H. Koiso,K. Hirata

Program committee S.Kamada,K. Oide,K. Hirata

Proceedingscommittee K. Oide,K. Hirata

Hereis thelist of talks:

1. Openingaddress(S.Kurokawa)

Physicsin SAD (review of physicsunderlyingin SAD)

2. Overview of SAD (K. Oide)— Coordinatesystems,Tracking(symplecticintegrators,radia-tion), GeometricalandOptics(finite amplitudeandoff energy) matching, etc.

3. TaylorMapanalysisin SAD (K. Ohmi)

4. Orbit andDispersionCorrections(M. Kikuchi)

5. Emittancesin ElectronRings(K.Hirata)(Commentsontheanomolousemittance[5] byK. Oide)

6. Spinin SAD (K. Yokoya)— SODOM

Applicationsof SAD

[General]

7. Beam-BeamInteractionswith nonlinearlattice(Weak-strongmodel)(K.Ohmi)

8. Simulationof ElectronBeamwith SpaceChargeForce(K.Oide)

9. EmittanceGrowth Dueto Intra-BeamScattering(K.Oide)

10. SynchrotronRadiation(nearfields)(S.Kamada)

Page 30: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

30 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

11. NonlinearMachineStudy(S.Kamada)

[DesignStudy]

12. KEKB Collider (H.Koiso)

13. VSX: TheFutureProjectof VUV andSoftX-RayHigh Brilliant Light Source(H.Takaki)

14. HadronAccelerators(S.Machida)

[Simulation]

15. Studyof 3D LaserCoolingby SAD (T.Kihara)

16. Wake FieldsandCBI (H.Fukuma)

17. Estimationof theBeamLossin KEKB TransportLine (Y.Funakoshi)

[MachineStudy]

18. SAD in ATF OperationandStudy(K.Kubo)

19. DetectionandCorrectionof MachineErrorsby a -bump(S.Matsumoto)

20. Mini-beta/xycouplingcompensation— Perfectmatching(S.Kamada)

21. Commisioningof KEKB J-Linac(H.Koiso)

[Computers]

22. SAD/Tkinter;KB Frame(N.Akasaka)

23. UserRemoteEnvironment(K.Furukawa)

24. SAD comuptersystem(T.Mimashi)

25. SAD in Python(N.Yamamoto)

26. ObjectOrientedProgrammingin SAD Script(N.Akasaka)

27. SADÄ� ��� ¨� ��� ��� ? (K.Ohmi)

[Discussion]

28. Futureproblems(Y.Kamiya,N.Kumagai,Y.Mori)

29. ClosingRemarks(K.Hirata)

SAD hasmany new andusefulfeatures.Thesewereimplementedaccordingto thevariousdemandsatvariousstages.Trackingthroughasolenoidwith anangle,for example,wasgener-atedto designKEK B factory. Also, SAD consistsof many levelsto meettherequirementsofdifferenttypesof users.Thewholestructureis notsimple,becausethespeedof thecalculationhasbeenthoughtto be the mostimportant. Accordingly, addingnew elementsin the deepestlevel of the trackingis becomingmoreandmorelaborious.In addition,it is very difficult forremoteusersto enjoy really characteristicfeaturesof SAD. (Of course,onecanlogin andrunSAD throughthe internet. To make clever useof all the equipmentsin SAD, however, oneshouldbetterconsultthespecialists.)

As a conclusionof theworkshop,it waspointedout thattheactivities with SAD shouldbemoreorganizedasanintra-andinter-laboratoryproject.

Page 31: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

4.8. NEW DOCTORAL THESESIN BEAM DYNAMICS 31

References

[1] K.Ohmi, K.HirataandK.Oide,Fromthebeam-envelopematrix to synchrotron-radiationintegrals,Phys.Rev.E49, 751(1994).

[2] K.Oide,Synchrotron-RadiationLimit on the Focusing of Electron Beams, Phys.Rev.Lett.61,1713(1988).

[3] K.Hirata, An introductionto SAD, SecondAdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshop,CERN88-04(1988).

[4] K.OideandH.Koiso,Dynamicapertureof electronstorageringswith noninterleavedsex-tupoles, Phys.Rev.E47, 2010(1993).

[5] K.Oide andH.Koiso, Anomalousequilibrium emittancedueto chromaticity in electronstoragerings, Phys.Rev. E49, 4474(1994).

4.8 NewDoctoral Thesesin BeamDynamics

4.8.1 Kyoko Makino

Author: Kyoko Makino(6����9("1����"9:-5!4;«6<:�=*>��#�=

),NationalSuperconductingCyclotronLaboratoryMichiganStateUniversityaddress:NSCLatMSU, S.Shaw Lane,EastLansing,MI 48824-1321,USA

Institution: Departmentof PhysicsandAstronomyMichiganStateUniversity.

Title: RigorousAnalysisof NonlinearMotion in ParticleAccelerators.

Date: March16,1998.

Supervisor: Prof. Martin Berz (A������-���<�4����*«6<:(=*���#�=

), Departmentof PhysicsandAstron-omyNationalSuperconductingCyclotronLaboratory.

Abstract: TheDifferentialAlgebraic(DA) techniqueshavebeenwidely usedfor variouscom-putationalproblemssuchasthe determinationof high orderTaylor transfermapsof accel-erators. A new approach,the Remainder-enhancedDifferentialAlgebraic(RDA) method,extendsthe methodto determineremainderboundsfor functionaldependencies,andmoreimportantly, solutionsof ordinarydifferentialequations.Thelatterrequiredto overcometheso-calledwrappingeffect,acommonproblemin otherapproachesfor theverifiedsolutionofdifferentialequations.Altogether, themethodsnow allow therigorouscomputationsof tightboundsof transfermaps.Thebasictheoryandits applicationsaswell asits implementationin thecodeCOSYINFINITY arediscussed.

Furthermore,thethesisdiscussesthederivationof aLagrangianandHamiltonianformulationfor themotionin electromagneticfieldsin threedimensionalcurvilinearcoordinatesinclud-ing torsionandwith arc-lengthasindependentvariable,aswell asa wavelet-basedmethodto includemeasuredfield datain theequationsof motion.

4.8.2 Zhir ong Huang

Author: ZhirongHuang(�������-���9:`>��"94;8o���q

),ANL

Page 32: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

32 4. ACTIVITY REPORTS

Institution: StanfordUniversity.Title: RadiativeCoolingof Relativistic ElectronBeams.Date: May, 1998.Supervisor: Prof. RonaldD. Ruth(

æ���"���4�#08æ!=-�!����5�����"*$5(�), SLAC.

Abstract: We attemptto make a completeanalysisof the processof radiationdampingandquantumexcitationin variousacceleratorsystems,suchasbendingmagnets,focusingchan-nelsandlaserfields. Becauseradiationis formedovera finite time andemittedin quantaofdiscreteenergies,we invoke thequantummechanicalapproachwhenever thequasiclassicalpictureof radiationis insufficient. We show that radiationdampingin a focusingsystemisfundamentallydifferentfrom thatin a bendingsystem.Quantumexcitationto thetransversedimensionsis absentin a straight,continuousfocusingchannel,and is exponentiallysup-pressedin a focusing-dominatedring. Thus,the transversenormalizedemittancesin suchsystemscanin principlebedampedto theComptonwavelengthof theelectron,limited onlyby theHeisenberg uncertaintyprinciple. In addition,we investigatemethodsof rapiddamp-ing suchasradiative lasercooling. We proposea laser-electronstoragering (LESR)wheretheelectronbeamin a compactstoragering repetitively interactswith anintenselaserpulsestoredin anopticalresonator. Thelaser-electroninteractiongivesriseto rapidcoolingof elec-tron beamsandcanbeusedto overcomethespacechargeeffectsencounteredin a mediumenergy circular machine. Applicationsto the designsof low emittancedampingrings andcompactx-raysourcesarealsoexplored.

Text: postedat�-���!�'),+�+�.�.-.�J:!4���5`J:�����"�&�����#����#�=<+���=�A :!+-:!4���5������1���-�1:!+-:-4���5�v���v������u����!694

4.8.3 Jiuqing Wang

Author: JiuqingWang( � ��"�o�������A����95��7Ù%�����*���5`J5(" ),Instituteof High Energy Physics(IHEP), ChineseAcademyof Sciences,P. O. Box 918(9)Beijing 100039,P. R. China

Institution: IHEP.Title: Designof a latticewith negative momentumcompactionfactorfor a tau-charmfactory

andpreliminaryresearchto therelatedmicrowaveinstability.Date: June23th,1997.Supervisor: Prof. ShouxianFang( è ��"�o�:�B���A����95��u$%�����*>��5`$5(" ), IHEPAbstract: Thepossibilityanda methodof designinga high luminositycollider with negative

momentumcompactionfactor( �  �� M ) latticearestudied.It is envisagedthat in a colliderwith ( �  �� M ) the bunchlengtheningwill be weaker thanthat in the �  �� M casefor thesamebunchcurrentso that the high luminosity canbe promised. As a practicalexample,a tau-charmfactory (TCF) with �  �� M lattice is proposedanddesigned.A preliminaryresearchto thelongitudinalmicrowave instability in a ring with �   � M is alsoincludedandthebeaminstabilitiesin the �  !� M TCF areinvestigated.Thebunchlengthwassimulatedwith thelongitudinalwakefield. It wasconfirmedthatbunchlengtheningis weakin thecaseof �  "� M .

Page 33: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

5: ForthcomingBeamDynamicsEvents

5.1 Inter national Symposium on “New Visions in Laser-Beam Interac-tions”

TachishigeHirose�<����-:��!��5!�(6��*«6���������v�=*���5`>���

Tokyo MetropolitanUniversity

InternationalSymposiumon“New Visionsin Laser-BeamInteractions”— FundamentalProblemsandApplicationsof Laser-ComptonScattering—

October11-15,1999

Theabovesymposiumwill beheldin theInternationalHouseof TokyoMetropolitanUniversity,Tokyo JAPAN which will be organizedby Tokyo MetropolitanUniversity (TMU) andHighEnergy AcceleratorResearchOrganization(KEK).

Recentlyrapiddevelopmentof superlow-emittanceelectronbeamsandhigh power short-pulselaserbeamsis openinga new interdisciplinalyfield of laser-beaminteractionswhich isrelatedto varioustraditionalfieldssuchashigh energy physics,nuclearphysics,laserscience,plasmaphysicsandsoon. This symposium,sheddinglight on new aspectsof laser-Comptonscatterings,is intendedto discussthemostrecentresultson thefollowing topics.

* Generationof polarizedgamma-raysandpolarizedpositronbeams* Gamma-gammaColliders* Non-lineareffectsin laser-Comptonscattering* FemtosecondX-ray production* Lasercoolingof acceleratorbeams* Topicsin thehighfield science* High qualityelectronbeams* High quality laserbeamsThecontactperson(ScientificSecretary)is Dr. R Hamatsu:����6����1:�=���5!�(6��*«6���������v�=*���5`>���

TMU

5.2 Workshop on SpaceChargeDominated BeamPhysicsfor Heavy IonFusion

Y.BatyginA����-s�o1("��!�1(����B��*8�9(����"*po��;>���

RIKEN, Wako-shi,Japan

RIKEN, 10-12December1998

In RIKEN, theRadioactive IsotopeBeamFactoryProjecthasbeenapprovedby the Gov-ernmentas a new stageof fundamentalresearchin heavy-ion physics. Among the varietyof planningexperimentsthe high temperatureplasmatarget physicsstudyfor Heavy Ion Fu-sion applicationis of the main importance.Beamspacecharge effect remainsthe key prob-lem for designersof high intensity accelerators.Purposeof the Workshopis to review thepresentunderstandingof spacecharge phenomenain high intensityacceleratorsfor HIF and

33

Page 34: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

34 5. FORTHCOMING BEAM DYNAMICS EVENTS

to discusspossiblesolutionof unresolvedproblems.The following issuesareexpectedto bediscussed:high intensityparticlesources:parametersandbeamtransport,mechanismsof emit-tancegrowth andhaloformation;transverseandlongitudinalbeamequilibria;equipartitioningin linacs;spacechargein recirculatorsandstoragerings;beambunching,coolingandstacking;simulationcodes.Detailedinformationis availableat�-���!�'),+�+��1�����B��*p�1(����"'8o��;,���1+LA����-s-o1%"1+

Page 35: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

6: Announcementsof thebeamDynamicsPanel

6.1 AdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshops

6.1.1 Nonlinear and CollectivePhenomenain BeamPhysics

M. Cornacchia5!����"���5�5(�<��!��:�:���4;J:!4���5`J:�����"�&�����#����#�=

SLAC

The 16th AdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshopon ”NonlinearandCollective Phe-nomenain BeamPhysics”will beheldin Arcidosso,Italy, onSeptember1-5,1998.Thework-shopwill be usedto discussthe theoreticalandexperimentaltools neededto studythe beamphysicsfor presentandfutureaccelerators.Theworkshopwill beorganizedwith threeinitialgeneralreview presentations,afterwhich theparticipantswill divide in threeworking groups.Theworkinggroupsandinitial talksare:

Group 1: Single Particle Non-linearDynamics: recentadvancesin nonlineardynamics,including frequency analysisand mapping. Group Leader: R. Robin (SLAC), Speaker: E.Todesco(CERN)

Group2: CreationandManipulationof High PhaseDensityBeams:advancesin produc-tion, acceleration,transportandmonitoringof high brightnessbeams,includingcoherentandradiationeffects.GroupLeader:J.Rossbach(DESY),Speaker: B. Carlsten(LANL)

Group3: Physicsof, andPhysicswith, High Energy DensityBeams:advancesin longi-tudinalandtransversedynamics,emittancepreservationandbeamloadingin plasmasystems.GroupLeader:I. Lindau(Un. of Lund),Speaker: A. Sessler(LBNL)

For informationandregistrationpleasecontactMs. MelindaLaraneta

4�������"������!���-��s�:-!5-:`�=95!4!�7>��#�=UCLA,Departmentof Physics&Astronomy,Box 951547,LA, CA 90095-1547,ph:(310)206-2499fax:(310)206-1091.

Also visit theUCLA page:�-�-�!�*),+�+���A��14;/����s�:-�5�:`�=95�4!�7>�!#!=.

6.1.2 Future Light Sources

K. J. Kim��.���"�o������-���9:`���"14;8o���q

ANL

The17thAdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshopon“ConceptsonFutureeLight Source”

AdvancedPhotonSource,ArgonneNationalLaboratoryApril 6-9,1999

With thesuccessof current-generationsynchrotronradiationresearch,it is importantto an-ticipatefuturedevelopmentof radiationsources.Thereareseveraldirectionsto pursue:higher

35

Page 36: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

36 6. ANNOUNCEMENTSOFTHE BEAM DYNAMICS PANEL

brightness,full coherence,shortertime resolution,extensionof spectrum,compactness,etc.Thelinac-basedself-amplifiedspontaneousemissionis beingactively pursuedby severallabo-ratoriesbecauseit promisesto deliverx-raybeamsabouttenordersof magnitudebrighterthanthe current-generationsources. The storagering-basedfree-electronlasersare breakingthelong-held2400˚¡ barrier. Recentdevelopmentsin acceleratortechnologyandhigh-powersolidstatelaserscouldplayanimportantrole in thefuturelight sourcescheme,suchasfemtosecondx-raygeneration.Thegoalof theworkshopis to provideanopportunityfor theexpertsin thesefieldsandthosein currentsynchrotronradiationresearchto evaluatetheproposedschemesforfuturelight sourcesandto explorenew ideasthroughvigorousinterdisciplinarydiscussions.

Theworshopis intendedto beasequelto thesimilarworkshopheldin GrenobleonJanuary22-25,1996. In view of the successof the Grenobleworkshopand the significantprogressmadesincethen,we expectthis workshopwill have an importantimpacton the futurecourseof radiationsourcedevelopment.

Topicsto bediscussedinclude:Z ScientificopportunitiesZ Self-amplifiedspontaneousemissionZ Free-electron-laseroscillatorsZ Extensionof storagering capabilitiesZ Femtosecondx-raysZ Novel sourcesemploying high-power lasers

Thewoshopchairis Kwang-JeKim, andtheprogramchairis JohnGalayda.A homepageis availableon theWebat�-���!�*)J+�+�.�.�.*>���9:`���"14;8o���q�+-5!��"�&�������"95���:�+ è�# ��.������9:(�1���6.2 ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS MINI-W ORKSHOP

ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS MINI-W ORKSHOPon

InjectionandExtractionin High IntensityProtonMachines24-26February1999

CLRCRutherfordAppletonLaboratory, Chilton,Didcot,Oxon,UK.

A workshopisbeingorganisedbyRAL for February1999onaspectsof injectionandextraction,mainly in high intensityprotonmachines.The meetingwill be held at Cosener’s HouseinAbingdonandwill bethesixth in a seriesof mini-workshopsheldundertheauspicesof ICFA.Thetopicscoveredwill beof interestin relationto thenew large-scalespallationneutronsources (ESS,SNS,JAERI-SNS),theprotondriverof amuoncolliderandotherhigh intensityprotonmachines(JHF, AGSupgrade,PSRupgrade,a New ProtonSourceat Fermilab,etc.). Issuestobediscussedwill include:Z chargeexchangeinjectionby meansof strippingfoils, asusedin ISISandproposedin designs

for anumberof new machines;

Page 37: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

6.3. ICFA BEAM DYNAMICS NEWSLETTER 37

Z the laserstrippingideasfor chargeexchangeinjectionunderstudyat JAERI, in Europeandelsewhere;Z chopping,longitudinalandtransversephasespacepainting;Z techniquesof fastandslow extraction.

Suggestionsfor topicsfor inclusionin theseareasandoffersof contributionswill bewelcomed.

Organizers:C.R.PriorandG.H.ReesRutherfordAppletonLaboratory, Chilton,Didcot,OxfordshireOX11 0QX, UnitedKi ngdomTel: +1235-821900,Fax: +1235-445607E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

6.3 ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter

Editors in chiefKohji Hirata(

�<��������!��������q���B�/����������)

JohnM. Jowett ( $ ����"* $ ��.���������5�����"*$5(� )S.Y. Lee(

:���s�4�������%"�#1���"��7>�!#�=)

6.3.1 Aim of the Newsletter

TheICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletteris intendedasa channelfor describingunsolvedprob-lemsandhighlighting importantongoingworks,andnot assubstitutefor journalarticlesandconferenceproceedingswhich usuallydescribecompletedwork. It is publishedby the ICFABeamDynamicsPanel,oneof whosemissionsis to encourageinternationalcollaborationinbeamdynamics.

6.3.2 Categoriesof the Articles

It is publishedeveryApril, AugustandDecember. Thedeadlinesare15March,15Julyand15November, respectively.

Thecategoriesof articlesin thenewsletterarethefollowing:

1. Announcementsfrom thepanel

2. Reportsof BeamDynamicsActivity of agroup

3. Reportsof BeamDynamicsrelatedworkshopsandmeetings

4. Announcementsof futureBeamDynamicsrelatedinternationalworkshopsandmeetings.

Thosewhowantto usenewsletterto announcetheirworkshopsetccandoso.Articlesshouldtypically fit within half apageandincludedescriptionsof thesubject,date,placeanddetailsof thecontactperson.

5. Review of BeamDynamicsProblems

Thisisaplaceto putforwardunsolvedproblemsandnotto beusedastheachievementreport.Clearandshorthighlightson theproblemis encouraged.

Page 38: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

38 6. ANNOUNCEMENTSOFTHE BEAM DYNAMICS PANEL

6. Lettersto theeditor

It is a forum opento everyone. Anybodycanshow his/heropinionon the beamdynamicsandrelatedactivities,by sendingit to oneof theeditors.Theeditorskeeptheright to rejecta contribution.

7. New DoctoralThesesin BeamDynamics

Pleasesendannouncementsto theeditorsincludingthefollowing items(asaminimum):

(a) Name,emailaddressandaffiliation of theauthor,(b) Name,emailaddressandaffiliation of thesupervisor,(c) Nameof theinstitutionawardingthedegree,(d) Thetitle of thethesisor dissertation.(e) Dateof awardof degree.(For awhile,weacceptthethesisawardedwithin oneyearbefore

thepublicationof thenewsletter.)(f) A shortabstractof thethesisis alsoverydesirable.

8. Editorial

All articlesexceptfor 6) and7) areby invitationonly. Theeditorsrequestanarticlefollow-ing a recommendationby panelmembers.Thosewho wish to submit an article are encour-agedto contacta nearby panelmember.

Themanuscriptshouldbesentto oneof theeditorsasaLaTeX file or plaintext. Theformeris encouragedandauthorsareaskedto follow theinstructionsbelow.

Eacharticleshouldhave thetitle, author’sname(s)andhis/her/theire-mailaddress(es).

6.3.3 How to Prepare the Manuscript

Here,theminimumpreparationis explained,which helpstheeditorsa lot. Thefull instructioncanbefoundin WWW at�-�����*),+�+�.-.�.�v���5-5�v��!��������s0/�����*>���1+ å&%�è-þ +�("<:��-�!=<5��9!��"*�����694whereyoucanfind thetemplatealso.

Pleasefollow thefollowing:Z Do notputcomments(%) whensendingthemanuscriptthroughe-mail. Instead,youcanuse' 5!�(6�6as' 5��(6�6)(�s���=��Ý5!�(6�6���"-�1:�*

. It is definedas'newcommand

'comm[1]

(�*.Z Startwith

' :���5��9���"+((�<(��4����& s���=�� �����9!5!4��,*. It is essential.Z Thenputyourname,e-mailaddressandaffiliation.Z It is uselessto includeanyvisual formattingcommands(suchasverticalor horizontalspac-

ing, centering,tabs,etc.).Z Do notdefinenew commands.Z Avoid TEXcommandsthat arenot part of standardLATEX. Theseincludethe likesof - #���& ,- 5���"�������4�("�� , - ��4��o!" , . . . .Z Pleasekeepfiguresto a minimum.Thepreferredgraphicsformatis EncapsulatedPostscript(EPS)files.

Page 39: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

6.4. WORLD-WIDE WEB 39

6.3.3.1 Regular Correspondents

Sinceit is impossiblefor theeditorsandpanelmembersto watchalwayswhat is goingon allaroundtheworld, we have startedto have Regular Correspondents. They areexpectedto findinterestingactivities andappropriatepersonsto reportthemand/orreportthemby themselves.Wehopethatwewill havea”compactandcomplete”list coveringall overtheworld eventually.ThepresentRegular Correspondentsareasfollows

Liu Lin (4�%=���"<:`,4�"14�:`�A��

) LNLS BrazilS.Krishnagopal(

:��-�1!:���"��!��5�����J5�����>����"�����$%") CAT India

IanC. Hsu (!5(�<:(=���%"<:`�"-�!�-=*>��#�='/��.

) SRRC TaiwanWearecalling for morevolunteersasRegular Correspondents.

6.3.4 Distribution

TheICFA BeamDynamicsNewslettersaredistributedthroughthefollowing distributors:

W. Chou [email protected] NorthandSouthAmericasHelmutMais [email protected] Europe*andAfricaSusumuKamada [email protected] Asia** andPacific

(*) includingformerSoviet Union.(**) For mainlandChina,ChuangZhang(

������"�o�5���A����95��7Ù%�����*���5`J5(") takescareof thedis-

tributionwith Ms. SuPing,Secretariatof PASC,P.O.Box918,Beijing 100039,China.It canbe distributedon a personalbasis. Thosewho want to receive it regularly canask

thedistributor to do so. In orderto reducethedistribution cost,however, pleaseuseWWW asmuchaspossible.(Seebelow).

6.4 World-W ide Web

Thehomepageof theICFA BeamDynamicsPanelis at theaddress�-���!�'),+�+�.�.-.�v���5�5�v��!��������s0/������>���1+ å&%-è�þ +�-5�&��u/�-��6<4(which happensto bein Japan).For reasonsof accessspeed,therearemirror sitesfor EuropeandtheUSA at �-���!�'),+�+�.�.-.1:!4����'J5�����"'J5(�1+��5�&���+�-���!�*)J+�+�.�.�.*$%"�#1���"��7>�!#�=1+ .��5�&���+��5�&��u/�-��6<4All threesitesareessentiallyidenticalandprovideaccessto theNewsletters,FutureWorkshops,andotherinformationusefulto acceleratorphysicists.Therearelinks to informationof localinterestfor eacharea.

6.5 ICFA BeamDynamicsPanelOrganization

The missionof ICFA BeamDynamicsPanel is to encourage and promoteinternationalcol-laborationonbeamdynamicsstudiesfor presentandfutureaccelerators. For this purpose,wepublishICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletters threetimesayear, wesponsorAdvancedICFA BeamDynamicsWorkshopsand ICFA BeamDynamicsMini-Workshops, andwe organizeWorkingGroupsin thepanelto promoteseveralimportantissues.

Page 40: ICFA Beam Dynamics Newsletter, No. 17icfa-usa.jlab.org/archive/newsletter/icfa_bd_nl_17.pdf · ICFA Beam Dynamicsworkshop on ”Synchro-BetatronResonances” (Madeira, 1993)in a quite

40 6. ANNOUNCEMENTSOFTHE BEAM DYNAMICS PANEL

Chairman K. HirataChief Editors of ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter K. Hirata,J.M. Jowett,S.Y. LeeDistributers of ICFA BeamDynamicsNewsletter W. Chou,H. Mais,S.KamadaLeader and Subleaderof Future Light SourceWorking Group K. J.Kim andJ.L. LaclareLeader and Subleaderof Tau-Charm factory Working Group E.A. PerelsteinandC.ZhangLeader of High-BrightnessHadron BeamsWorking Group W. ChouPanelMembers

AinosukeAndo (��"�#�����4���:��9`��<~6��-���v�����5(�'>��5`����

) Himeji Inst.Tech./SPRING8PisinChen (

5(����"���:!4!��5`J:�����"�&����-#0>��#�=) SLAC

WeirenChou (5��1��=��-�!#�5!��"*p&�"���4;po���q

) FermilabKohji Hirata (

�����������<��������!��������>���) KEK

Albert Hofmann ( þ 4�A����!�*�����&�61��"�"���5�����"*J5�� ) CERNIngoHofmann ( å ��1��&�6���"-"��!o�:-` ��/ ) GSISergei Ivanov (

�q���"1��q :���6�B0$%�����*J:(=) IHEP(Protvino)

JohnM. Jowett ( $ ���-"* $ ��.���������5�����"*J5�� ) CERNKwang-JeKim ( � .���"�o $ � � ~6���6���5%6����4;,4�A94;8o���q ) LBNLJean-LouisLaclare (

4!��5!4������!��:!��4!���4;J5����78&��) SOLEIL

S.Y.Lee (:(��s�4����!��("�#1���"��7>��#�=

) IndianaUniv.HelmutMais (

6���!:���6����4 8#���:�s�8#��) DESY

Luigi Palumbo (4�����4�=!6-A1���!&�����:-5����9�Ù%"�&�"*Ù(�

) Univ.Rome/LNF-INFNClaudioPellegrini (

5!4���=�#9�����q���:����7��-��s�:-!5-:`�=95!4��7>��#�=) UCLA

ElcunoA. Perelstein(��������4���4������IC0�7>��("��08#�=-A�"��u$:(=

) JINRDmitri Pestrikov (

����:��-�1(�1��q���%"-�*�"9:��*J:(=) BINP

ChuangZhang (������"�o�5���A����951�0$%�����'>��5`J5�"

) IHEP(Beijing)

The views expressedin this newsletterdo not necessarilycoincide with thoseof theeditors. The individual authors are responsiblefor their text.


Recommended