"ICH E8 General Considerations for Clinical Trials”
Dansk selskab for GCP onsdag den 14 april 2021
LISBETH BREGNHØJ, LÆGEMIDDELINSPEKTØR, GCP, LÆGEMIDDELSTYRELSEN
Tak
14. APRIL 20212
‒ Tak til E8 EWG medlemmer Carole Legare og Fergus Sweeney for lån af adskillige slides
Agenda
14. APRIL 20213
E8 (R1) Work plan and current statusE6/E8 GCP renovation initiativeE8 (R1) Goals & ChallengesE8 (R1) Overview
– General Principles
– Promoting Quality by Design in clinical studies
– Critical to Quality Factors
– Drug development planning
– Study design considerations
– Study conduct & reporting
– Identifying CQFs
– Annexes
E6 (R3) Status
E8 (R1) Work plan
14. APRIL 20214
• Original E8 document adopted in 1997
• ICH issued Reflection Paper on GCP Renovation in 2017
• E8 (R1) Expert Working Group formed in the same year
• E8 (R1) Draft published for public consultation from April to October 2019
• Adopting an ICH Harmonised Guideline planned for 2020
5
Stakeholder feedback on ICH E6 (R2) consultation
External Stakeholders’ Letter to EMA and ICH 31 Jan/26 Feb 2016– Academic stakeholders in 22 countries (5 organizations, 119 academic
researches)
Concerns• Need to improve focus on issues most critical for trial quality
• One size fits all approach is not suitable for different types of trials
• Academic stakeholders are not involved in the ICH processes
• 2016 ICH Meeting in Lisbon• Academic stakeholder representatives invited to meet with Management
Committee and ICH E6(R2) EWG representatives to discuss issues raised in their letter
6
E8 is an integrative platform for other ICH guidelines (‘ICH E0’)
7
ICH Reflection on GCP Renovation
• Step 1: Revision to ICH E8• Goal is to address broader concerns about the principles of study
design and planning for an appropriate level of data quality• Provides comprehensive cross-referencing to the family of ICH
guidance documents
• Step 2: Renovation of ICH E6 GCP• Goal is to address flexibility concerns with respect to a broader range of study
types and data sources• Retains the current focus on good clinical investigative site practices
Current status of E8
14. APRIL 20218
E8 will not reach step 4 before June 2021, so development of training material has not been started yet.
E8 (R1) - Goals & Challenges
14. APRIL 20219
• Promote fit-for-purpose clinical trials by:• Introducing ‘Quality by Design’ concept and identifying ‘Critical to
Quality’ factors • Upfront assessment of risks specific to development programme &
study design• Proportionate management of these risks and respective control
Facilitating a broad range of study designs and data sources
“This document focuses on designing quality into clinical studies, considering the diversity of clinical study designs and data sources used to support regulatory and other health policy decisions.”
14. APRIL 202110
Reliable information
Decision making
General PrinciplesChapter 2
14. APRIL 202111
• Protection of Study Participants• Health risks and confidentiality
• Scientific Approach• On development programme & study level. The development plan is considered to
cover the entire product lifecycle and include non-clinical, clinical, and post-approval studies.
• Iterative research process. The results of prior studies should inform the plan of later studies.
• Patient Voice• On objectives and design realisation• To improve feasibility & promote commitment
“The essence of clinical research is to ask important questions and answer them with appropriate studies”
Promoting high-quality studiesChapter 3
14. APRIL 202112
• Introduces ‘Quality by Design’ concept to clinical research
• Suggests devising a specific set of factors critical to the quality of a given study (CQFs)
• Outlines approach to identifying and managing risks to CQFs“The likelihood that a clinical study will answer the research questions posed in a reliable manner, meaningful for decision makers and patients, while preventing important errors, can be dramatically improved through prospective attention to the design….of the …. protocol, procedures and associated operational plans.
Quality should rely on good design and its execution rather than overreliance on retrospective document checking, monitoring, auditing or inspection. These activities are an important part of a quality assurance process but are not sufficient to ensure quality of a clinical study.”
Critical to Quality Factors (CQFs)Chapter 3
14. APRIL 202113
• Identifying attributes whose integrity is fundamental to study quality via:• Open dialogue, multiple stakeholders• Triage and focus on essential activities• Proactive implementation in protocol• Continuous review and risk-proportionate adaptations
Flexibility instead of one-size-fits-all strategy
Important bridge to be drawn to E6 – from what to how
Critical to Quality Factors (CQFs)Chapter 3
14. APRIL 202114
– A basic set of factors relevant to ensuring study quality should be identified for each study. Emphasis should be given to those factors that stand out as critical to study quality.
– ..critical because, if their integrity were to be undermined …the reliability or ethics of decision-making would also be undermined.
– ..determine the risks that threaten their integrity, the probability and impact of those risks and to decide whether they can be accepted or should be mitigated.
– Where it is decided that risks should be mitigated, the necessary control processes should be put in place and communicated, and the necessary action taken to mitigate the risks
14. APRIL 202115
‒ Perfection in every aspect ..is rarely achievable or .. only .. achieved by use of resources ..out of proportion to the benefit obtained. …study procedures should be proportionate to the risks inherent in the study and the importance of the information collected.
‒ Study designs should be operationally feasible and avoid unnecessary complexity and unnecessary data collection. Patient consultation early in the study design process contributes to these factors and would be likely to result in fewer protocol amendments. Protocols and case report forms/data collection methods should enable the study to be conducted as designed.
Drug development planningChapter 4
14. APRIL 202116
• Considerations at the development programme level• From target product profiling through post-approval research• Main focus on clinical studies, combining step-wise evidence building with
flexibility in study planning• Special populations and study feasibility addressed as additionally important
issues
Types of clinical studiesChapter 4
14. APRIL 202117
Elements of study designChapter 5
14. APRIL 202118
• Key design aspects include:
• Study population
• Intervention
• Control group
• Response variable
• Bias reduction
• Statistical analysis
Data sourcesChapter 5
14. APRIL 202119
• Broadly describes primary & secondary data generation/collection
• Primary data collection, refers to data collected for study purposes using processes that ensure a sufficient level of quality
• Secondary data use, refers to the use of data that were collected for other purposes and are not collected just for the study
• Acknowledges different data sources and respective methods and technologies used
• Highlights specific caveats and the importance of data standards
Study conduct & ReportingChapter 6
14. APRIL 202120
• Study Conduct• Adequate protocol set-up, adherence and respective training• Data Management and appropriate/inappropriate (interim) access to study
data• Participant safety
• Safety monitoring, data collection and stopping rules• Role of Data Monitoring Committees
• Study Reporting• Reference to ICH E3• Promotes transparency and public access to study data
Identifying CQFsChapter 7
14. APRIL 202121
• Example list of considerations to identify CQFs at the planning stage
• Non-exhaustive and of varying importance depending on the specific situation
• Evident «usual suspects», but an adaptive approach to devising CQFs is the core message
‘Living’ Annexes 1-3
14. APRIL 202122
• Annex 1:• Plots research objectives and respective study examples along drug
development process• integrates chapters 4 (types of studies) & 5 (elements of study design
and data sources)• Annex 2:
• ICH E-Guideline family• Annex 3:
• Cross-referencing CQFs to other ICH documents as applicable
14. APRIL 202123
14. APRIL 202124
E6 (R3) status
14. APRIL 202125
Advanced principles draft…good news coming!Annex I in progress, drafting groups established on the sections deemed as needing most attention first
Principles
Annex –1
Annex-2
Step-1 / 2
Anticipated ApproachSimultaneous work on the principles AND Annex-1
Close coordination
Develop Updated Concept Paper for Annex 2
Simultaneous work streams
Principles + Annex 1 in Step-3
Annex 2 reaching Step-1
Feedback
Approximately 24 months Approximately 12-18 months
Endorsement of Concept Paper –Nov - 2019Step-4
14. APRIL 202127
To be continued
https://www.ich.org/page/efficacy-guidelines
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E8-R1_EWG_Step2_Presentation.pdf
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E8-R1_EWG_Draft_Guideline.pdf