+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Date post: 07-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: jerry-brown
View: 108 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
25
Introducing Hengtong Marine Hengtong Marine manufacture Submarine Cable Systems Power, Optical Fibre, Hybrid and Umbilical Cables Submarine Optical Cables are UJ & UQJ certified Current optical cable capacity 6500km, which is being upgraded to 12,000km by end 2016 On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of Cables Hengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016
Transcript
Page 1: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Introducing Hengtong Marine• Hengtong Marine manufacture Submarine Cable Systems • Power, Optical Fibre, Hybrid and Umbilical Cables• Submarine Optical Cables are UJ & UQJ certified• Current optical cable capacity 6500km, which is being

upgraded to 12,000km by end 2016

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 2: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Hengtong Group – Fibre Products

kilometers of fiber per year

Sold in more than countries and regions

12 production bases around the world

50 million

Hengtong Industry Chain

Fiber Preform

Optical Fiber

Cable

Component and connection system

EPC and turn-key project service

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 3: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of Cables

Hengtong Marine Cable Systems

Presenter : Dr. Jerry Brown

ICPC Plenary Meeting: 12 April 2016 Hamburg

ICPC Plenary April 2016

www.hengtongmarine.com

Page 4: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Audience Participation(Wake Up & Stretch Your Arms)

• How many people know about DNV-RP-F109 ?• How many people have used DNV-RP-F109 ?• Do you think a DNV recommended practice for

pipelines (typically 76mm to 1800mm diameter & concrete coated) is really applicable to flexible cables (typically 18mm to 40mm diameter) ?

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 5: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Why is On-Bottom Cable Stability Important ?• The cable should remain on the as laid cable route

– for ease of location – recovery during future maintenance operations

• For the convenience of other seabed users – to avoid damaging any adjacent equipment, – sensitive or protected marine organisms and

• To avoid cable damage – due to abrasion, – kinking,– fatigue failure due to repeated flexing and bending.

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 6: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

• Seabed Type• Roughness• Properties• Friction

coefficient• Cable

penetration• Trench

Depth

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Factors which affect Cable Stability ?

• Cable Diameter

• Cable Weight• Cable Lay

direction• Marine

Growth & density

• Wave direction• Significant Wave

Height• Peak Wave Period• Current Speed &

Direction• Reference height

for current• Water depth

Page 7: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Cable Design For Stability• TIMING - During the Cable system route engineering, the cable on-

bottom stability should be checked.• CHECK LIST - These checks are often not completed at the design

stage due to a lack of environmental data, or they are over-looked by clients / suppliers.

• DESIGN - On-bottom stability checks completed at the correct time, allows the cable design (armouring) and engineering to be adjusted to meet the site conditions and client requirements… for a reasonable cost.

• TOO LATE - Often the reality is that the cable is manufactured (or deployed) before on-bottom stability is considered.

• FIX - A retro-fitted solution has to be engineered = increased costs.

Page 8: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Classical Theory for On-Bottom Stability

V90 = √ { ( 2 . g . Ww ) / (d . ρ . [ (CDrag / μ ) + CLift ] ) }

CDrag = CLift= 1.2 μ = 0.5 for armoured cables on rock and sandμ = 0.2 for armoured & LW cables on clay, silt, mud

Page 9: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

• Seabed Type• Roughness• Properties• Friction

coefficient• Cable

penetration• Trench Depth

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

The Classical Theory uses some parameters

• Cable Diameter

• Cable Weight• Cable Lay

direction• Marine

Growth & density

• Wave direction• Significant Wave

Height• Peak Wave Period• Current Speed &

Direction• Reference height

for current• Water depth

Page 10: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Cable

Marine Growth

Knowing the density of the Marine Growth and assuming the cross section of growth shown above, allows an equivalent ‘cable with growth’ diameter & weight in water to be calculated

Page 11: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

LWP

Page 12: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

DNV-RP-F109 On-Bottom Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines

• DNV-RP-F109 2007, revised in 10/10, and amended in 11/11. • Analyses the stability characteristics of a circular CSA pipeline

(diameter and weight). Considers water depth, seabed type and environmental conditions (i.e. current and wave profiles).

• Three different design approaches to analyzing pipeline stability • 1st …. calculations for absolute (zero movement) static stability, • 2nd …. calculations for a generalized stability method with design

curves for virtually stable pipes (allowing up to 0.5 diameters lateral displacement) and for up to 10 pipe diameters displacement in an extreme storm condition.

• 3rd …. is based on a full dynamic analysis method.

Page 13: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

DNV-RP-F109 - Parameters Used … … … … … … but are they all necessary ?

• Cable Diameter

• Cable Weight• Cable Lay

direction• Marine

Growth & density

• Wave direction• Significant Wave

Height• Peak Wave Period• Current Speed &

Direction• Reference height

for current• Water depth

• Seabed Type• Roughness• Properties• Friction

coefficient• Cable

penetration• Trench Depth

Page 14: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

DNV-RP-F109 – DNV have released STABLELINES … … … … … …Hengtong Marine have verified our software against STABLELINES

Page 15: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 16: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

The Effect of Waves on Seabed Stability of DA cable using DV-RP-F109 (Absolute Stability Method)

Page 17: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

DNV-RP-F109 (Absolute Stability Method) Versus Classical Theory for DA cable

Considering the effect of only Current on the Sea Bed Stability of Cables

DNV-RP-F109 provides more conservative results when using a reference height = cable diameter

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 18: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Affect of Bottom Roughness on Current Profiles

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 19: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Affect of Trench Depth on Stability

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 20: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

For a cable bundle dimensions D x 2D, the stability analysis can be simplified and approximated to a circular cable, diameter D with a perpendicular current V90 which is half the current acting on the bundle.

Stability Analysis of Cable Bundles

Page 21: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Affect of Cable Aspect Ratio (Dmax/Dmin)

• As the Cable Body Aspect Ratio increases, seabed stability increases• The current reduction factor allows a circular cable stability analysis with a

reduced V90.• Low profile cross-section (large Aspect Ratio) increase seabed stability

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 22: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Methods of Improving Seabed Stability of Cables• Change the weight of the cable

– Cable design (additional layers of armour)– Addition of modular ballast elements– Application of protective pipes– Clamp or Pin the Cable to the seabed

• Change the cable profile– Attachment of Ballast Wire (Cable Bundle)– Cover with Mattress (low profile shape)

• Burial of the cable– Rock Dumping– Trenching

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 23: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

Comparison of Stability Methods

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Page 24: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

On-Bottom (Sea Bed) Stability Design of CablesHengtong Marine Presentation to ICPC Plenary April 2016

Conclusions• Two On-Bottom Stability Calculation methods have been

introduced & results compared • The comprehensive capability of DNV-RP-F109 has been

demonstrated. There are limitations. DNV is working on a joint program to develop an amendment to enhance RP-F109 for flexible cables

• An analysis technique for cable bundles proposed• Some methods of improving on-bottom stability of cables

have been reviewed• Hengtong Marine are developing new methods of

stabilising cables.

Page 25: ICPC Presentation April 2016 Hamburg Rev 3

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION …

ANY QUESTIONS ?


Recommended