Date post: | 19-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jeremy-leonard |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IDEM Update & Air Quality OverviewAir and Waste Management
AssociationWinter Technical Meeting
December 12, 2006
Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner
IN Department of Environmental Management
New State Laws impacting IDEM from the 2006 Legislative Session
HB1110—Removal of Mercury Convenience Switches from End of Life Motor Vehicles.SB 234—Improving the rulemaking process for wet weather discharges and authorizing the Environmental Stewardship Program.HB1117—Simplifying the solid waste statutes and eliminating the groundwater task force.SB 146—Removing the Property Transfer Disclosure Form from Statute.
IDEM’s Environmental Goal
Increase the personal income of all Hoosiers from the current $0.88/$1.00 of the national average to at least $1.00/$1.00 of the national average while maintaining and improving Indiana’s Environmental Quality.
Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index
Yale Center for Environmental Law & PolicyYale University
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)Columbia University
http://www.yale.edu/epi/
How Will IDEM Help Increase Personal Income?
Clear, consistent and speedy decisionsClear regulationsAssistance first, enforcement secondTimely resolution of enforcement actionsEvery regulated entity will have current valid
permits without unnecessary requirementsWritten Standard Operating Procedures Improved staff training and development
How Does IDEM Protect the Environment?
Measure the air, water and land to determine the existing state of the environmentCompare the measured values to levels that protect human health and the environment Ambient Air Quality Standards Water Quality Standards Safe soil and ground water clean up levels
Use modeling to determine how much of a substance can be added to the environment
How Does IDEM Protect the Environment?
Develop regulations and issue permits to restrict discharges to the environment to safe levelsInspect and monitor permitted facilities to ensure compliance with the permitsEnforce against people who exceed their permit levels or violate regulationsEducate people on their environmental responsibilities
Performance MetricsQuality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments
% of Hoosiers that live in counties that meet air quality standards81% 100% 80% 4 counties @ 1,178,770 of
6,271,973 failed
% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage 40% 100% 20% 75% by 2007 is goal
Permitting EfficiencyTotal calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute
Land 103,336 37,430 86,864 233 permits
785 permits
125 permits
Air 407,187 207,731 385,000
Water162,156 44,550 200,000
* Places emphasis on back logged permits
ComplianceTotal percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards
Inspections 95.92% 97% 75%
Self reporting 96.48% 99% 95%
Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.47% 99.90% 98.95%
* Tracks observations and not just inspections
Organizational TransformationBudgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions.
Dollars spent on outside services per year$4,179,367 $0 $3,447,017
Will require increase in head count to accomplish
Counties above AQ StandardsJanuary 10, 2005 Allen Boone Clark Dubois Elkhart Hamilton Hancock Madison Marion Shelby St. Joseph
October 1, 2005 Clark Dubois Hamilton Marion
Counties above AQ StandardsJanuary 1, 2006 Clark Dubois Hamilton Marion Vanderburgh
October 1, 2006 Clark Dubois Marion Vanderburgh
Ozone Attainment Status
PM2.5 Attainment Status
PM 2.5 StatusNew 24 hour standard issued in September—Annual standard retainedDesignations will initially be based upon 2004-2006 air quality, but the process will allow the use of data up to 2009New nonattainment designations April 2010, SIPS due 2013SIPS for current nonattainment areas due April, 2008—we may try redesignations
D a i l y D e s i g n V a l u eP r o p o s e d N A A Q S V a l u e = 3 5 u g / m 3
3 0 3 3 3 6 3 9 4 2 4 5
A l l e n B e a c o n S t
C l a r k S p r i n g S t
J e ff e r s o n v i l l e
J a s p e r
N e w A l b a n y
K o k o m o
E a s t C h i c a g o
G a r y B u r r S t .
L a k e 6 5 0 M a d i s o n S t
L a k e F e d e r a l B l d g
H a m m o n d R o b e r t s d a l e
L a P o r t e
M a n n R o a d
M a r i o n E n g l i s h A v e
M a r i o n 7 2 5 0 E . 7 5 t h S t
M a r i o n E . M i c h i g a n S t .
O g d e n D u n e s
S t . J o e s e p h A n g e l a & E d d y
S p e n c e r D a l e
T i p p e c a n o e 3 4 0 1 G r e e n b u s h S t
V a n d e b u r g h C i v i c C e n t e r
U n i v o f E v a n s v i l l e
V i g o D e v a n e y S c h o o l
Sit
e
D e s ig n V a lu e
Permitting
IDEM is still meeting the statutory deadlines for permit issuance, as reported in past years
IDEM now tracks the total calendar days a permit is in house and is applying a deadline to permits that traditionally do not have a statutory deadline; as a new interpretation to the intent of statutes
Total Permit Calendar Days
0
1 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0
A i rW a t e rL a n d
Air Permits for New Facilities
New Toyota Production at Lafayette Subaru FacilityLouis Dreyfus Soy Biodiesel Plant—Largest in the USSeven new Ethanol Production Facilities with eight pendingHonda Greensburg NSR permit issued in 94 days
Percent of Activities Meeting Regulations
9 1 . 0 0 %9 2 . 0 0 %9 3 . 0 0 %9 4 . 0 0 %9 5 . 0 0 %9 6 . 0 0 %9 7 . 0 0 %9 8 . 0 0 %9 9 . 0 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 0 %
I n s p e c t i o n sS e lf R e p o r t i n gE m i s s i o n M o n i t o r i n g
Office of Enforcement2002-2006
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006*
Referrals 887 607 467 547 574Violation Letters 17 33 47 203 225Notice of Violations 561 457 318 202 400
Agreed Orders 311 349 314 258 405Commissioner's Orders 15 15 6 41 37
Dismissals 125 121 44 48 46* December 7, 2006
Major Regulatory InitiativesRegulations to facilitate the proper management of e-ScrapRulemaking to require the removal of mercury convenience switches from automobiles prior to crushing or shreddingRulemaking to allow Performance Track (Indiana Environmental Stewardship Program)—Will be accepting applications in September
Major Regulatory InitiativesOutdoor Wood Fueled Boilers—EQSC Report recommended waiting to proceed until EPA issues its model ruleUtility NOx, SO2 and Mercury emission rules:CAIR, which regulates NOx and SO2, was adopted
by the Air Pollution Control Board in November.CAMR, regulating mercury, was due to EPA on
November 17, but Indiana does not have a Final Rule because there has been no resolution of issues between Utilities which favor the federal program and the Hoosier Environmental Council which favors a 90% reduction—Second Notice
Major Regulatory InitiativesRulemaking to establish presumptive 8-1-6 VOC BACT controls to streamline permitting: Acid Scrubbers for foundry core making amines—
Withdrawn at Request of INCMA Compliance with certain NESHAPs--Continuing Ethanol Plant BACT—Final Adoption 12/6/2006
Possible statewide regulations on the formulation of consumer products (i.e. air fresheners, deodorants, etc.) and paint products to ensure continued compliance with the Ozone standard and reduce our impact on neighboring States—First Notice SoonAdjustments to the Title V fees to fully fund the program—Air Board Adoption 12/6/2006
IDEM Fees & Fund Balances Title V Example
Significant Communication Challenge:Auditor reports the “check book balance” for each
fund on June 30 IDEM collects almost all of its Title V fees in the
2nd Quarter of each year. IDEM’s June 30 fee balance is similar to a
person’s check book balance right after depositing their paycheck
IDEM must pay all of its bills until the next pay day (next June 30) without overdrawing
IDEM Fees & Fund Balances Title V Example
For the last five years (FY 02-FY 06), Title V fund expenditures have exceed revenues by $5,771,277, yet the June 30, 2006 check book balance was $10,039,779 which many people believe is a healthy fund balance.This fund balance is insufficient to cover the estimated $10,587,184 in expenditures up to the date of receipt of new funds in the 2nd Quarter of 2007.
IDEM Fees & Fund Balances Title V Example
The “payday checkbook balance” minus the expenditures before the next pay day gives the “minimum cash in the check book” which is projected to be negative by $547,405 during FY 06.The actuarial fund balance (assets less contracted liabilities) is much worse because the fund has $6,131,187 in contractual obligations and its projected lowest net worth is actually a debt of $6,678,592.
FY 06 Available Cash by MonthFY 2006 7-31-2005 8-31-2005 9-30-2005 10-31-2005 11-30-2005 12-31-2005 1-31-2006 2-28-2006 3-31-2006 4-30-2006 5-31-2006 6-30-2006
Available Cash Balance 5,160,120 5,106,237 2,670,495 391,762 (1,197,329) (1,170,121) (2,876,751) 889,278 5,464,556 4,763,721 4,182,213 3,767,774
$391,762
($2,876,751)
$3,767,774$4,182,213
$4,763,721
$5,464,556
$889,278
($1,170,121)
$5,106,237
$5,160,120
$2,670,495
($1,197,329)
(4,000,000)
(3,000,000)
(2,000,000)
(1,000,000)
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
Available Cash Balance
Possible Issues for 2007 Legislation
Possible 2007 Legislative IssuesBudgetFederal Funds continuing to decreaseState General Funds fluctuateDedicated Funds: Except for Title V, fees
collected for do not relate to program costs—some programs like Methamphetamine Clean-up and Mercury Switch Management completely unfunded (Considering adjusting Title V fees)
Consider Prohibiting the Commissioner from renewing a permit for a facility that was not constructed or has not operated for the past 5 years
Environmental Crimes Task ForceEnvironmental Crimes Task Force Created by SEA 195 (2005) has been meeting since October, 2005.Chaired by Senator KenleyDeveloping more specific environmental criminal statutes.Plan to develop legislation for consideration in the 2007 session.
Possible 2007 Legislative IssuesStreamlined Rulemaking when adopting Federal Requirements (including deadlines) without changeAsk the 2007 EQSC to study Environmental Rulemaking ProcessCurrent Roles of Environmental DistrictsRegional Water and Sewer DistrictsSolid Waste Management Districts
Possible 2007 Legislative IssuesStreamline the OEA (Office of Environmental Adjudication) Process, especially for permit appeals. Issues include:Standing (i.e. who can appeal)Timeliness of DecisionsThe Standard of Review (i.e. Arbitrary and
Capricious)Potential for the Collection of Damages
Inactive legislative issue—Supplemental Environmental Project Banking.
Questions?
Tom Easterly100 N. Senate Ave. IGCN 1301
Indianapolis, IN 46204(317) 232-8611
Fax (317) [email protected]