+ All Categories
Home > Documents > [IEEE 2007 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices - Boise, ID, USA...

[IEEE 2007 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices - Boise, ID, USA...

Date post: 03-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: brent
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Poster Presentation 6: Logic Circuits Operating in Both Sub- and Above-Threshold Voltages Jabulani Nyathi and Brent Bero Washington State University School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science 102 Spokane Ave Pullman, WA 99164 Abstract-Interest in VLSI subthreshold design has recently increased due to the emergence of systems that require ultra-low power operation. Furthermore the ever increasing leakage currents, now used to drive logic make subthreshold design an interesting prospect. Subthreshold sacrifices speed for power creating a clear divide between designing for high speed and ultra-low power. It might be beneficial to allow circuits designed for subthreshold operation to become operable at above threshold voltages (super-threshold), depending on processing needs. In this study among other things; the feasibility of optimizing device sizes for both subthreshold and above threshold operations is considered. Three widely publicized body biasing techniques are examined and compared to a newly proposed tunable body biasing scheme. The comparison is in terms of power and energy dissipation as well as speed. A number of logic styles are simulated to draw conclusions on what logic style in conjunction with what body biasing scheme offer improved performance. The proposed tunable body biasing scheme offers the ability to operate circuits in either the subthreshold region for ultra-low power, at above threshold voltages for high speed or at voltages that offer optimal speed-power operation (2*Vto) for example). Device sizing for circuits to span all the regions of operation is examined. The tunable body biasing approach leads to increased operating frequencies particularly in subthreshold operation and shows no performance degradation at voltages above threshold, hence bridging of the speed-power gap. Post layout simulations of circuits ranging from simple to more complex ones enable for effective evaluation of optimal device sizing and identifying the optimal power-speed operational region. Simulations have been performed at a modest 180 nm technology node and ring oscillator circuits show optimal operating regions ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 V. An 8-bit linear feedback shift register using the tunable body biasing scheme serves as a design example and expends 4.24 joules per second at super-threshold while dissipating 2.34 nJ per second at subthreshold voltages. The linear feedback shift register also shows optimal operating regions ranging from 0.5 to 1.1 V. Traditionally Tunable Body Biased Biased Vdd = 376.2 mV Vdd = 376.2 mV \ Vih = 225 mVN Vih =200mV Vil = 200 m Vil 175 mV Vss= mV Vss = 0 mV TBB and static CMOS inverters have comparable noise margins, TBB VIH is 12.5% worse, and TBB VIL is 14.3% better. 62
Transcript
Page 1: [IEEE 2007 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices - Boise, ID, USA (2007.04.20-2007.04.20)] 2007 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices - Poster Presentation

Poster Presentation 6: Logic Circuits Operating in Both Sub-and Above-Threshold Voltages

Jabulani Nyathi and Brent BeroWashington State University

School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science102 Spokane Ave

Pullman, WA 99164

Abstract-Interest in VLSI subthreshold design has recently increased due to the emergence ofsystems that require ultra-low power operation. Furthermore the ever increasing leakage currents,now used to drive logic make subthreshold design an interesting prospect. Subthreshold sacrificesspeed for power creating a clear divide between designing for high speed and ultra-low power. Itmight be beneficial to allow circuits designed for subthreshold operation to become operable atabove threshold voltages (super-threshold), depending on processing needs. In this study amongother things; the feasibility of optimizing device sizes for both subthreshold and above thresholdoperations is considered. Three widely publicized body biasing techniques are examined andcompared to a newly proposed tunable body biasing scheme. The comparison is in terms of powerand energy dissipation as well as speed. A number of logic styles are simulated to drawconclusions on what logic style in conjunction with what body biasing scheme offer improvedperformance.

The proposed tunable body biasing scheme offers the ability to operate circuits in either thesubthreshold region for ultra-low power, at above threshold voltages for high speed or at voltagesthat offer optimal speed-power operation (2*Vto) for example). Device sizing for circuits to spanall the regions of operation is examined. The tunable body biasing approach leads to increasedoperating frequencies particularly in subthreshold operation and shows no performancedegradation at voltages above threshold, hence bridging of the speed-power gap. Post layoutsimulations of circuits ranging from simple to more complex ones enable for effective evaluationof optimal device sizing and identifying the optimal power-speed operational region. Simulationshave been performed at a modest 180 nm technology node and ring oscillator circuits showoptimal operating regions ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 V. An 8-bit linear feedback shift register usingthe tunable body biasing scheme serves as a design example and expends 4.24 joules per secondat super-threshold while dissipating 2.34 nJ per second at subthreshold voltages. The linearfeedback shift register also shows optimal operating regions ranging from 0.5 to 1.1 V.

Traditionally Tunable BodyBiased Biased

Vdd = 376.2 mV Vdd = 376.2 mV \

Vih= 225 mVNVih =200mV Vil = 200 m

Vil 175 mV

Vss= mV Vss = 0 mV

TBB and static CMOS inverters have comparable noise margins, TBB VIH is 12.5% worse, andTBB VIL is 14.3% better.

62

Recommended