+ All Categories
Home > Documents > [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA...

[IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA...

Date post: 01-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: ingo
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
20% EFFICIENT SCREEN PRINTED LBSF CELL FABRICATED USING UV LASER FOR REAR DIELECTRIC REMOVAL S.Ramanathan 1 , A. Das 1 , I.B.Cooper 1 , A.Rohatgi 1 , 2 , Adam Payne 3 ,lngo Koehler 4 1. University Center of Excellence for Photovoltaics, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA 2. Regent's Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, 2. Founder and CTO, Suniva Inc.,Norcross,GA,USA, 3. Suniva Inc.,Norcross,GA,USA, 4. Merck KGM, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293 Darmstadt Germany ABSTRACT Low-cost high efficiency solar cells are the key to achieving grid parity with photovoltaic devices. Laser processing in silicon photovoltaics is being incorporated at various stages to achieve this target. This paper details the fabrication, charaerization and analysis of 4 cm 2 screen printed cells with efficiency over 20% achieved using a UV laser ablation for selective opening of rear dielectric. These cells are compared to cells fabricated using a screen printed etching paste for opening vias through the rear dielectric. Microscopy was used to examine the impact of laser pulses on the silicon surface and quality of the BSF and compare it with vias opened using etching paste. Characterization and analysis of these cells is performed using IOE measurements and supported by PC1 D modeling. It was und that while laser ablation had an effect on the morphology of the silicon surface, the overall quality of the local back surce field and dieleric rear passivation were maintained, resulting in high cell efficiencies and Voe. INTRODUCTION The move towards thinner and higher efficiency cells is seen throughout the photovoltaic industry as the push towards grid parity continues [1]. Newer materials, cell designs and technologies are being developed continuously to gain an edge over the conventional full BSF cell design [2,3]. High efficiency cell structures are being fabricated with the use of new technologies to simpli their fabrication and make them cost-effective. Laser technology is one of the options being explored at various stages of solar cell fabrication to improve throughput, uniformity and precision in processing. Various types of lasers have been studied and used for wafer isolation [4], doping [5], contact firing [6] and selective ablation of dielectrics [7]. The use of lasers in solar cell manufacture is an important step towards better cell designs. Lasers are expected to increase uniformity, throughput and reproducibility in the fabrication of new cell designs. It can be used as a simpler alternative for photolithography based processes. In this study, a UV laser with nanosecond pulse-width is used for seleive ablation of rear dielectric to achieve a high efficiency cell structure. Selectivity of the laser is a particularly important need when ablating the dielectric from diffused surfaces or on surface whose passivation is 978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE important [8]. In those cases the type of laser, the energy used and its effect on the silicon surface and bulk are critical to the final performance of the cell. In this study, the dieleric removal is performed on an undised surface and does not introduce a new interface. However the quality of the opening is considered a vital component for the formation of good contact and a uniform BSF, which ultimately is expected to reduce the effects of parasitic shunting surrounding the rear contact points. The use of lasers, in this particular study, is expected to improve uniformity over the entire wafer suace and from wafer to wafer in a batch. It is expected that laser ablation will make this technology relatively independent of the wafer surface, wafer thickness and rear dielectric stack employed making it suitable for use in large scale production. High efficiency LBSF cells, referred to as Delta-STAR, have previously been repoed with the use of a screen- printed etching paste for defining vias through the rear dielectric stack [9]. High efficiency Delta-STAR cells with rear vias opened using laser and screen printed etching paste are compared in this study. Cell characterization and modeling, through microscopy, IOE and PC1D is used to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the rear passivation on these two types of cells. Surface damage caused by the UV laser is also studied using SEM imaging. The results of this study reveal that the selective removal of dielectric can be performed using the UV laser for application in high efficiency cell structures as an alternative to defining vias by etching paste. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS Delta-STAR cells with etching paste or laser ablation were fabricated exactly the same way before and aſter the definition of vias. The 75 010 passivated emitter and dielectric passivated rear surface were obtained in a single high temperature step. A screen-printing paste (from Merck KGM) was used for the definition of vias through the rear dieleric on the standard Delta-STAR cells. Front Ag and rear AI contacts were screen printed and co-fired. A modified cell isolation technique involving dicing and chemical etching of nine 4 cm 2 cells on 100 mm diameter wafers was employed followed by a forming gas anneal. A schematic of the resulting cell is shown in figure 1. 000678
Transcript
Page 1: [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA (2010.06.20-2010.06.25)] 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 20% efficient screen

20% EFFICIENT SCREEN PRINTED LBSF CELL FABRICATED USING UV LASER FOR REAR DIELECTRIC REMOVAL

S.Ramanathan1, A. Das1 , I.B.Cooper1, A.Rohatgi1,2, Adam Payne3,lngo Koehler4

1. University Center of Excellence for Photovoltaics, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA 2. Regent's Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA,

2. Founder and CTO, Suniva Inc.,Norcross,GA,USA, 3. Suniva Inc.,Norcross,GA,USA,

4. Merck KGM, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293 Darmstadt Germany

ABSTRACT

Low-cost high efficiency solar cells are the key to achieving grid parity with photovoltaic devices. Laser processing in silicon photovoltaics is being incorporated at various stages to achieve this target. This paper details the fabrication, characterization and analysis of 4 cm2

screen printed cells with efficiency over 20% achieved using a UV laser ablation for selective opening of rear dielectric. These cells are compared to cells fabricated using a screen printed etching paste for opening vias through the rear dielectric. Microscopy was used to examine the impact of laser pulses on the silicon surface and quality of the BSF and compare it with vias opened using etching paste. Characterization and analysis of these cells is performed using IOE measurements and supported by PC1 D modeling. It was found that while laser ablation had an effect on the morphology of the silicon surface, the overall quality of the local back surface field and dielectric rear passivation were maintained, resulting in high cell efficiencies and Voe.

INTRODUCTION

The move towards thinner and higher efficiency cells is seen throughout the photovoltaic industry as the push towards grid parity continues [1]. Newer materials, cell designs and technologies are being developed continuously to gain an edge over the conventional full BSF cell design [2,3]. High efficiency cell structures are being fabricated with the use of new technologies to simplify their fabrication and make them cost-effective. Laser technology is one of the options being explored at various stages of solar cell fabrication to improve throughput, uniformity and precision in processing. Various types of lasers have been studied and used for wafer isolation [4], doping [5], contact firing [6] and selective ablation of dielectrics [7].

The use of lasers in solar cell manufacture is an important step towards better cell designs. Lasers are expected to increase uniformity, throughput and reproducibility in the fabrication of new cell designs. It can be used as a simpler alternative for photolithography based processes. In this study, a UV laser with nanosecond pulse-width is used for selective ablation of rear dielectric to achieve a high efficiency cell structure. Selectivity of the laser is a particularly important need when ablating the dielectric from diffused surfaces or on surface whose passivation is

978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©201 0 IEEE

important [8]. In those cases the type of laser, the energy used and its effect on the silicon surface and bulk are critical to the final performance of the cell. In this study, the dielectric removal is performed on an undiffused surface and does not introduce a new interface. However the quality of the opening is considered a vital component for the formation of good contact and a uniform BSF, which ultimately is expected to reduce the effects of parasitic shunting surrounding the rear contact points. The use of lasers, in this particular study, is expected to improve uniformity over the entire wafer surface and from wafer to wafer in a batch. It is expected that laser ablation will make this technology relatively independent of the wafer surface, wafer thickness and rear dielectric stack employed making it suitable for use in large scale production.

High efficiency LBSF cells, referred to as Delta-STAR, have previously been reported with the use of a screen­printed etching paste for defining vias through the rear dielectric stack [9]. High efficiency Delta-STAR cells with rear vias opened using laser and screen printed etching paste are compared in this study. Cell characterization and modeling, through microscopy, IOE and PC1D is used to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the rear passivation on these two types of cells. Surface damage caused by the UV laser is also studied using SEM imaging. The results of this study reveal that the selective removal of dielectric can be performed using the UV laser for application in high efficiency cell structures as an alternative to defining vias by etching paste.

EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

Delta-STAR cells with etching paste or laser ablation were fabricated exactly the same way before and after the definition of vias. The 75 010 passivated emitter and dielectric passivated rear surface were obtained in a single high temperature step. A screen-printing paste (from Merck KGM) was used for the definition of vias through the rear dielectric on the standard Delta-STAR cells. Front Ag and rear AI contacts were screen printed and co-fired. A modified cell isolation technique involving dicing and chemical etching of nine 4 cm2 cells on 100 mm diameter wafers was employed followed by a forming gas anneal. A schematic of the resulting cell is shown in figure 1.

000678

Page 2: [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA (2010.06.20-2010.06.25)] 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 20% efficient screen

p-Si

�LBSF�

I - -Rear ontact and Re lector

Figure 1: Schematic of Delta-STAR cell structure

Laser ablation was performed using a Coherent UV laser (355 nm) with a nanosecond pulse-width and a gaussian beam profile. Vias were ablated through the rear dielectric stack to obtain a pattern identical to that obtained by the etching paste. Two different rear patterns were defined using the laser, while keeping the area fraction of vias identical. Multiple pulses of the laser were used to open vias that were identical in size and pitch to the screen printed vias. In order to make the pattern simpler and increase throughput, vias were also defined by a single pulse with a different via size and appropriately modified pitch in order to maintain the average area fraction of vias. Cell performance from this preliminary experiment was compared with measurement of I-V characteristics supported by cell characterization through IOE and reflectance measurements. Analysis of the silicon surface at the vias and the local back surface field formed under the contact was performed using optical and scanning electron microscopy.

IMAGING AND ANALYSIS

The effect of the laser ablation on the surface of the silicon and the selectivity of the process was analyzed using a microscope. While attempts were made to improve selectivity of the ablation through optimization, it was not completely eliminated and there was some damage to the silicon surface. Preliminary analysis of the surface damage was done by observing the vias under an optical microscope. The correct balance of energy per pulse is sought to remove the dielectric completely while introducing minimal damage to the silicon surface and subsurface bulk. The resulting images are shown in figures 2(a)-2(c). Surface roughness is high in vias formed by the UV laser, which also results in a material accumulation around the edge of the vias. However dielectric ablation within the via appears to be complete with the power setting used in this study.

The quality of the BSF is closely related to the quality of the vias and hence can have a significant effect on the cell performance. The quality of BSF obtained on cells fabricated using the UV Laser was analyzed. This was compared to the BSF obtained on wafers using the screen printed etching paste. The cross section of a point contact was observed under an SEM after cleaving the sample. A difference in contrast can be seen between the bulk Si and

978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE

the BSF around the contact metal. This band, as seen in figures 3(a)-3(c), is continuous around the contact but varies in thickness. The formation of a thick and continuous BSF is critical for high efficiency LBSF cells, particularly to isolate the metal contact from the surrounding areas which are dielectric passivated. It was observed that -5-6 IJm thick BSF was present around the contact in both types of vias. The thickness and uniformity of the BSF formed in vias using multi-pulse laser ablation was also similar to the ones formed in vias using single­pulse ablation. The BSF was found to be thickest in the middle and tapered closer to the edges. It was thinnest near the surface of the silicon. While the BSF was thin in certain areas, its existence around the entire contact, which is critical to the performance of this cell structure, was proven. It was also observed that the shape of the local contact and BSF was identical in both cases indicating that the contact formation and alloying to form the BSF was not affected by the surface morphology. Thus, a small amount of surface damage by the UV laser can be tolerated for this particular cell structure.

Figure 2 (a): Optical microscope Image of typical via defined using etching paste

Figure 2(b):Optical microscope Image of typical via defined using UV laser (1 pulse)

000679

Page 3: [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA (2010.06.20-2010.06.25)] 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 20% efficient screen

Figure 2(c): Optical microscope Image of typical via defined using laser A (5 Pulses)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The aforementioned Delta-STAR process was used to fabricate nine 4-cm2 cells on 100 mm diameter, 300 IJm thick FZ silicon wafers which had a base resistivity of 1.3 O.cm. The best cell fabricated using etch paste for definition of vias resulted in a peak efficiency of 20.3%. The best efficiency obtained using laser ablation of the rear dielectric was 20.0% with the 5 pulse via and 20.1% with the single pulse via. The cell Voc and Jsc were comparable for all three types of vias. Cells with the multi pulse method of via definition had the highest cell Voc and Jsc but had a slightly lower FF resulting in a similar overall efficiency. These cell parameters are also comparable to the previous best Delta-STAR cell reported on a 2.3 O.cm wafer and can be seen in table 1. Preliminary modeling shows that due to the difference in base resistivity, the higher FF compensates for a slightly lower Jsc, resulting in an identical efficiency. Overall these voltages and currents represent a significant improvement over full AI BSF cell structures. This cell is the highest efficiency cell fabricated using laser ablation of vias, further proving the feasibility of use of the UV laser for selective removal of the rear dielectric.

Figure 3 (a): SEM image of contact and BSF obtained using etching paste vias

978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©201 0 IEEE

Figure 3(b): SEM image of contact and BSF obtained using ablation with UV Laser (5 Pulses)

Figure 3 (c): SEM image of contact and BSF obtained using ablation with UV Laser (1 Pulse)

CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING

In order to compare the effect of the laser ablation the rear surface, the cells were characterized by measuring their reflectance and Internal Quantum Efficiency (IQE). Data was collected for wavelengths in the range of 300 - 1200 nm at 10 nm intervals. All cells had a similar emitter with a sheet resistance of -75 010 passivated identically. The rear surface was passivated with an identical dielectric­metal stack, so the only variation was the method of defining rear vias. The IQE response of these cells at wavelengths between 900 and 1100 nm is more relevant for the study of rear passivation. A comparison of the measured IQE from the representative cells of each case can be seen in figure 4. As a reference, the measured IQE of the previously reported 20.1 % efficient cell is also provided. It can be seen that the cells with vias defined by screen printed etching paste had the best response long wavelength suggesting that the lack of surface damage may result in slightly better passivation of the rear surface. Cells ablated with the UV laser with a single pulse and 5 pulses have very similar response, but is slightly inferior to that of the etched vias. However the overall quality of the rear paSSivation is similar and comparable. PC1D modeling was used to fit parameters to these measured curves. The

000680

Page 4: [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA (2010.06.20-2010.06.25)] 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 20% efficient screen

best cell reported has a modeled BSRV of 125 cm/s. As seen in the figure, the rear response of these other cells can be modeled with a BSRV of 150 cm/s. This slight change in BSRV is still within the limits of process and measurement variations and doesn't affect the cell performance adversely, as seen from the cell IV data. This is further evidence that the effect of the laser on the surface is not critical to the cell performance as it is consumed by the formation of the local BSF. The final

quality of the BSF and its uniformity is more important to the passivation and elimination of parasitic shunts.The measured reflectance curves seen in figure 4 indicate some non-optimal properties, which are understood to the reason for the variations in measured Jsc of the best cells. It is expected that with some more optimization of the texturing and anti-reflection coatings, the cells efficiencies can be improved further.

Table 1: Summary of data from cell measurement

Cell Resistivity

Voc (V) Jsc (mAlcm2) Efficiency (%) Fill Factor (ohm.cm) (%)

Screen printed etch-paste vias 1.3 0.657 38.7 20.3 79.8

Laser ablated - 1 Pulse* 1.3 0.652 39.0 20.1 79.0 Laser ablated - 5 Pulse 1.3 0.653 38.6 20.0 79.5 Screen printed paste* 2.3 0.653 39.4 20.1 78.1

* _L

- Measured at NREL with 3.8 cm aperture

100 100

90 90

80 -- Etch Paste Vias 80

70 70

-- Laser - 5 pulses 60 60 �

Q) " � 50

� 50 c

� -- Laser - 1 Pulse

40 40 &

30

Etch Paste - 20% verified

30

20 -

- - - - -

20

10 -- 10

o , 0

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Wavelength (nm)

Figure 4: Comparison of long wavelength IOE response of typical cells

CONCLUSION

High efficiency local BSF cells were fabricated using a UV laser for selective rear dielectric removal. The I-V parameters of the cells fabricated by laser ablation and screen-printed etching paste were very similar. Observation of the laser ablated vias under an optical microscope and SEM indicated that the vias formed using lasers had some amount of surface damage, but compensated by the formation of a good uniform BSF. Further cell characterization and analysis indicated that

978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE

the overall quality of the rear passivation was maintained, which was also supported by SEM analysis and PC1D modeling. Laser ablation was found to provide a fast and reproducible alternative to the screen printed etching process. The replacement of the 5 pulse process by the 1-pulse process results in higher throughput while improving the quality of the vias and reducing chances of parasitic shunts. The flexibility offered can help optimize the rear contact design further resulting in an increase in efficiency beyond 20.5 % and provide a more commercially viable alternative for fabrication of high efficiency thin cells.

000681

Page 5: [IEEE 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) - Honolulu, HI, USA (2010.06.20-2010.06.25)] 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 20% efficient screen

REFERENCES

1. Rohatgi. A, Ristow. A, Das. A et ai, Proc. 1 £lh International PVSEC, Kolkata, 2009

2. Zhao. J, Wang. A and Green. M, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, v 7, n 6, p 471-474.

3. Tsunomura. Y, Yoshimine. Y,Taguchi. M, et ai, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cel/s, 93 (2009) P 670-673.

4. Micheels. R. H and Valdivia, P.E, IEEE Trans Elec.Oev, 37, No 2 , P 353-354.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to thank Ajay Upadhyaya and Keith Tate for their help in processing Delta-STAR cells. This work was supported by DOE SAl contract DE-FG36-08G018075.

978-1-4244-5892-9/10/$26.00 ©201 0 IEEE

5. Abbott.M.D, Cotter.J.E and Fisher.K, Proc. IEEE 4th WCPEC, v 1, P 988-991.

6. Schneiderlochner. E, Grohe. A, Ballif. C, et ai, Proc. IEEE PVSC, P 300-303, 2002

7. Engelhart P, Harder NP, Horstmann T, Grischke. R, Meyer. R and Brendel R, Proc. 4th WCPEC, Hawaii, p 1027-1027, 2006.

8. Grohe. A, Harmel C. Knorz, A. et al,. Proc. IEEE 4th WCPEC,v 2,p 1399-1402.

9. Ramanathan. S, Meemongkolkiat. V, Das. A, et ai, Proc. 34h IEEE PVSC, Philadelphia, 2009.

000682


Recommended