+ All Categories
Home > Documents > IEP Development and Implementation

IEP Development and Implementation

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: elana
View: 41 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
IEP Development and Implementation. INTRODUCTIONS. Training Norms. NO SIDE BARS WRITE NOTES Cell Phones on SILENT OTHERS?. Your Learning Accountability. NOVICE INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED. Why This Module was Created. Purpose of Tools (POC) Implementation -- follow up year - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
111
IEP Development and Implementation
Transcript
Page 1: IEP Development and Implementation

IEP Development and Implementation

Page 3: IEP Development and Implementation

Training Norms

• NO SIDE BARS– WRITE NOTES

• Cell Phones on SILENT

• OTHERS?

Page 4: IEP Development and Implementation

Your Learning Accountability

• NOVICE

• INTERMEDIATE

• ADVANCED

Page 5: IEP Development and Implementation

Why This Module was Created

• Purpose of Tools (POC)

• Implementation -- follow up year

• Errors in the IEP Process

Page 6: IEP Development and Implementation

Errors in the IEP Process

• PLAAFP

• Goals and Objectives not related to ASD

• Laundry list of SAS

• Standard Time for Service

• Placement decisions predetermined– Lack of LRE in the Process

Page 7: IEP Development and Implementation

Purpose of This Module

• IS NOT– Compliance training in IEP development– Cover ALL aspects of IEP development– Address issues related to ALL disabilities– An IEP on your target student; Pre-IEP Planning

• IS– Honor PROCESS / not FORM– Honor LRE in the IEP process– Address unique needs of students with ASD in

the IEP process– Address IEP Implementation

Page 8: IEP Development and Implementation

AGENDA• Understanding FAPE

– History of Special Education– Purpose of the IEP– LRE– Ed Benefit Review

• Developing the IEP– The PLAAFP– Supplementary Aids / Services / Personnel Supports– Goals and Objectives– S. E. Programs/Services and Ancillary/Related Services– Transition

• IEP Implementation– Implementation Fidelity– IEP Transitions– Measuring Progress

Page 9: IEP Development and Implementation

Navigating the Acronyms

IEP MET

ER

SLD

MDE

ASD

OSEP

NCLB

FAPE

NPDC

LRE

80-80

94-142IT

ECSE EPLI

ECDD

START

FBA

BIP

IDEA

Page 10: IEP Development and Implementation

VOCABULARY / ACTIVITY

• LRE

• FAPE

• IEP

• Special Education

Page 11: IEP Development and Implementation

What is an IEP?

• Offering of FAPE to the family

• PROCESS

• Legally-binding written agreement / contract

Page 12: IEP Development and Implementation

Purpose of the IEPPurpose of the IEP

Access to and participation in….

General Education General Education CurriculumCurriculum

Extracurricular Extracurricular ActivitiesActivities

Nonacademic Nonacademic ActivitiesActivities

Page 13: IEP Development and Implementation

Special education is not a place. It’s a set of

supports and services . . .

Where a child with a disability receives special education

services is that child’s placement

The first “where” to

consider is…

Page 14: IEP Development and Implementation

OUR DECISIONS HAVE TO ALIGN WITH:

• THE RESEARCH

• THE LAW

• THE DATA

Page 15: IEP Development and Implementation

IDEIA Congressional Findings

• (5) Almost 30 years of research and experience has demonstrated that the education of children with disabilities can be made effective by…– (A) having high expectations for such

children and ensuring their access to the general education curriculum in the regular classroom, to the maximum extent possible, in order to…

Page 16: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATA

• “The achievement level of students with disabilities does not decrease in general education classrooms.”– Villa, Thousand, Meyers, & Nevin. (1996). Teacher

and administrator perceptions of heterogeneous education. Exceptional Children, 63, 29-45.

• “Placement in a special education class resulted in lower achievement for students who have lower cognitive ability.”– Kavale & Forness, (1999). Efficacy of special

education and related services. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

Page 17: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATAIEP and Inclusion Tips for Parents and Teachers

• “Students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms show academic gains in a number of areas, including improved performance on standardized tests, mastery of IEP goals, grades, on-task behavior, and motivation to learn (National Center for Education Restructuring and Inclusion, 1995). Moreover, placement in inclusive classrooms does not interfere with the academic performance of students without disabilities with respect to the amount of allocated time and engaged instructional time, the rate of interruption to planned activities and student achievement on test scores and report card grades.”– York, Vandercook, MacDonald, Heise-Neff and Caughey,

1992)

Page 18: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATA IEP and Inclusion Tips for Parents and Teachers

• “Although separate classes, with lower student to teacher ratios, controlled environments, and specially trained staff would seem to offer benefits to a child with a disability, research fails to demonstrate the effectiveness of such programs.”– (Lipsky, 1997; Sailor, 2003)

Page 19: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATA

• “The social competence, communication skills, and other developmental skills of students with disabilities improved in inclusive settings.”– Bennett, Deluca, & Bruns. (1997) Putting inclusion into

practice: Perspectives of teachers and parents. Exceptional Children, 64(1), 115-131.

• “The costs of inclusive services over time are likely to be less than those of segregated forms of service delivery.”– Halvorsen, Neary, Hunt, & Piuma. (1996). A model for

evaluating the cost-effectiveness of inclusive and special classes. Hayward, CA: PEERS Project, California State University.

Page 20: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATAIEP and Inclusion Tips for Parents and Teachers

• “There is mounting evidence that, other than a smaller class size, “there is little that is special about the special education system,” and that the negative effects of separating children with disabilities from their peers far outweigh any benefit to smaller classes.”– Audette & Algozzine, 1997

Page 21: IEP Development and Implementation

THE OUTCOME DATA• A University of Wisconsin-Madison 2002 study of 405

adolescents and adults with ASD found that:– 10% were in competitive employment – The lack of social skills and social understanding has been cited

as a primary cause of unemployment or under-employment for many otherwise skilled individuals on the autism spectrum.

• Barnard, et.al. 2001– As few as 6% of individuals with ASD have fulltime employment – 12% of individuals with Asperger Syndrome are employed despite

having average or high than average IQs

• MICHIGAN (2006-07)—61 Ss– w/ ASD

• 19.7% competitively employed– All Ss w/ IEP

• 30.1% competitively employed

Page 23: IEP Development and Implementation

THE LAW--HISTORY: ORIGINATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION

• Intention of Special Education– 1976 P.L. 94-142– ACCESS TO……

• WHY: Brown vs. Board of Education– You cannot segregate based on color………– You cannot segregate based on disability……..

• THIS IS A CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE– And the fight has already been fought……

Page 24: IEP Development and Implementation

Brown vs. Board of Education• Brown v. Board of Education was not simply

about children and education. The laws and policies struck down by this court decision were products of the human tendencies to prejudge, discriminate against, and stereotype other people by their ethnic, religious, physical, or cultural characteristics. Ending this behavior as a legal practice caused far reaching social and ideological implications, which continue to be felt throughout our country. The Brown decision inspired and galvanized human rights struggles across the country and around the world.

Page 25: IEP Development and Implementation

GETTING BACK TO THE INTENTION OF THE LAW

• Focus on One Curriculum: – General Education WITH Special Education

Support (instead of vs.)

• NCLB Revisions

• IDEA Revisions

• 80/80 Statement

OSEP

Page 26: IEP Development and Implementation

More >><< Less

General Education Classroom 80%+

Target 61% (63%)

MI CIMS Thresholds for RestrictionSPP Indicator 5: Educational

Environments2009-10 Targets (2010-11)

Continuum of Alternative PlacementsContinuum of Alternative Placements

Restrictive

Removal from the General Education Classroom 21-60%

Removal from the General Education Classroom >60%

Target 12.4% (11.9%)

Separate FacilityTarget 4.9%

(4.8%)

Page 27: IEP Development and Implementation

IDEA Regulations

• Two fundamental requirements:– That the child will receive FAPE

– In the least restrictive environment (LRE).

• “….IDEA’s strong preference that, to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities be educated in regular classes with their nondisabled peers with appropriate supplementary aids and services."

–Wrights Law

Page 28: IEP Development and Implementation

Defining FAPE

• FAPE is an individualized educational program that is designed to meet the child's unique needs and from which the child receives educational benefit, and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living.

– Wrights Law

Page 29: IEP Development and Implementation

Defining LRE: Fed Language

To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities are educated in the general education classrooms with children who are not disabled and that special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from regular education environment occurs only if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education  in regular classes with the use of supplementary aides and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. 

Page 30: IEP Development and Implementation

LRE Misconceptions

Student is in a restricted placement. Staff says: “Well, this is the ‘least restrictive environment’ for this student based on his/her needs.”

LRE is a LEGAL term – not a relative description of a program that fits a given students needs.

LRE is interpreted by the courts / states.

Page 32: IEP Development and Implementation

Why are we Segregated?

DISCUSSION

Page 33: IEP Development and Implementation

Personal Accountability to END Segregation

• We will never have integrated opportunities if WE (special education) are not integrated in the school culture

• How do you do that??

• START WITH: Strategies ….. Medium of Exchange (similarities—gen ed / spec ed)

Page 34: IEP Development and Implementation

BUT….. How do you make this CHANGE happen?

• Big picture?– Committee– Perfect Plan PRIOR to Implementation

OR

– Incremental steps . . .• PERSONAL Accountability /

Responsibility

Page 35: IEP Development and Implementation

Incremental Steps

YOUR ACCOUNTABILITY

Your Behavior Expresses Your Belief System

Page 36: IEP Development and Implementation

Your Behavior Expresses your Belief System…DO YOU……

• Talk about students with ASD by their age rather than their grade level?

• Talk about students with ASD in front of them?

• Use disability-first language? – Use “high functioning” and “low functioning” to

describe students? – Talk about students based on their eligibility

category rather than their name? (The Autistics)

Page 37: IEP Development and Implementation

• Send a folder of “alternative” work with the student to the general education class?

• Have “token” LRE time? Attend specials only?

• Have all the special education students eat at one lunch table? Have a different recess?

• Use of activities that are inappropriate for the age of the student (ex. Calendar / Clifford).

Your Behavior Expresses your Belief System…DO YOU……

Page 38: IEP Development and Implementation

• Convey test scores unrelated to how the student is functioning within the general education classroom?

• Blame parents for the problems their child is having.

• Believe that students with ASD are being manipulative, lazy, deliberate, choosing to not comply?– Blame the STUDENT for their problem….

Your Behavior Expresses your Belief System…DO YOU……

Page 39: IEP Development and Implementation

The point is this……..

THERE ARE BARRIERS TO SUCCESSFULLY EDUCATING

STUDENTS WITH ASD…..

WE SHOULD NOT BE ONE OF THOSE BARRIERS…..

LOU BROWN

Page 40: IEP Development and Implementation

Self Evaluation. . .

Beliefs and Behaviors that PREVENT Integrated Opportunities

Page 41: IEP Development and Implementation

Where we STARTed . . .

• You did what you did when you knew what you knew. . .

• You now know different – which makes you accountable

• Do Different: Incremental steps– Look in the mirror each morning and decide: do I

let the barriers stop me or do I do SOMETHING each day to make this change

Page 42: IEP Development and Implementation

Self Evaluation. . . Your accountability to the change process

Beliefs and Behaviors that SUPPORT Integrated Opportunities

Page 43: IEP Development and Implementation

REPORT OUT ACTIVITY

• If you write it down, you are even MORE likely to do it…. (Post Its)

• If you TELL someone else, you are even MORE likely to do it…. AND….

• If you post it, you are that much MORE likely to do it! ! !

Page 44: IEP Development and Implementation

NOW WHAT?

• Personal Accountability to promote and integrated culture….

• Personal Accountability in the IEP process to honor the development of an integrated culture through LRE / Universal Supports

• Personal Accountability in implementing the IEP process….

Page 45: IEP Development and Implementation

Educational Benefit Review PROCESS

• Was the IEP reasonably calculated to ensure Educational Benefit?

• What IS Educational Benefit? – Rowley (Supreme Court 1982) -- more than minimal

progress– Rowley in 2007 (align with IDEA 2004 / NCLB)

• PLAAFP related to involvement / progress in general curriculum

• MEASURABLE annual goals• Services planned to support PROGRESS toward goals• In the LRE (gen ed curriculum / environment)• IEP adjusted if no progress made

Page 46: IEP Development and Implementation

Materials Needed • THREE years of:

– IEPs

– METs / other assessments

– ER

– Progress Reports on IEP goals

Page 47: IEP Development and Implementation

Step 1: Complete ONE for Each YearEDUCATIONAL BENEFIT

Year 1 2 3

NEEDS / PLAAFP Supplementary Aids /

Services Goals / Objectives Related Services Progress

Where to get this

info?

Page 48: IEP Development and Implementation

Analyze Relationships Among ComponentsEDUCATIONAL BENEFIT

Year 1 2 3

NEEDS / PLAAFP Supplementary Aids /

Services Goals / Objectives Related Services Progress

Social

Page 49: IEP Development and Implementation

Analyze Relationships Among Components

• Are the assessments complete and do they identify all of the student’s needs?

• Does the PLAAFP statement identify all of the student’s primary needs related to progress in the general education curriculum / environment?

• Are all of the student’s needs, including postsecondary outcomes (for secondary students), addressed by supplementary aids and services, goals and objectives, and/or transition services?

• Are there programs and services to support all of the student’s goals and objectives?

• Did the IEP consider the LRE in developing the program?

• Did the student made progress on measurable goals and objectives? Is there objective data to support this progress? OR If adequate progress was not made, was the IEP adjusted?

Page 50: IEP Development and Implementation

Analyze Relationships Among ComponentsEDUCATIONAL BENEFIT

Year 1 2 3

NEEDS / PLAAFP Supplementary Aids /

Services Goals / Objectives Related Services Progress

Social Initiation

Page 51: IEP Development and Implementation

Analyze Relationships Across Years• In reviewing the comparison of the PLAAFP from Year 1 to Year 2

and from Year 2 to Year 3, if the student did make progress, were the goals and objectives, transition activities, or programs and services in Year 3 changed in the IEP to facilitate the student’s future progress, including participation in general education?

• In reviewing the comparison of the PLAAFP from Year 1 to Year 2 and from Year 2 to Year 3, if the student did not make progress, were the goals and objectives, transition activities, or programs and services in Year 3 changed in the IEP to facilitate the student’s future progress?

• Do the transition services provided for the student over the three-year period of review represent a coordinated set of activities related to the student’s vision for adult life?

• To assess for overall compliance: Considering the answers to each of the questions above, was the IEP reasonably calculated to result in educational benefit?

Page 52: IEP Development and Implementation

WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED?

You did what you did when you knew what you knew….

Once you know different, you are accountable to it!

Page 54: IEP Development and Implementation

Statement of the…Student’s present levels of academic achievement and functional performance

The PLAAFP

--how student’s disability affects student’s involvement and progress in the general education classroom and curriculum

Page 55: IEP Development and Implementation

What about “ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT?”

Page 56: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: Impact on Progress in

Gen EdAreas

preventing access and/or

impacting progress in

gen ed

Data—COMPARED

TO PEERS for each area

What impact does this have on

progress toward goals and objectives

PLAFFP Statement Framework

Page 57: IEP Development and Implementation

DATA COMPARED TO PEERS

• Standardized scores by themselves are not helpful because they do not link with the general education curriculum / classroom and are not specific enough to develop annual goals.

• State and district-wide assessments often DO related to the curriculum but may not be specific enough to develop annual goals.

• All assessment scores should be coupled with the day-to-day observational data, progress notes, and instructional and assessment information from the classroom.

Page 58: IEP Development and Implementation

OPTIONS for DATA

• Standardized Measures

• Rating Scales

• State / Local Assessments

• Classroom Output

• Grades / Progress Notes

• Direct Observation

• GLCEs

Page 59: IEP Development and Implementation

The Question to Ask

In what way does this student’s disability affect his/her ability to participate / progress in the general education classroom / curriculum?

• Characteristics Related to ASD– Ability to Participate in Instruction– Socialization Skills / Competence– Communication– Independent Skills– Transition Issues– Ability to Manage Stress / Anxiety– Behaviors– OTHERS?

Page 60: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: (compared to Peers)

Impact on Progress in Gen Ed

Social Teacher rating scale: 97% fewer social interactions than others of same age.

Sean talks about Star Wars excessively to peers. He does not have a preferred friend and is alone at lunch and recess.

In the classroom, Sean does not choose a partner or join a group to work without adult

prompting. He does participate in cooperative work with peers without

argument, which results in adult intervention and

facilitation or Sean having to leave the classroom. Social interactions are affected by continual Star Wars talk and communication difficulties.

PLAFFP Statement EXAMPLE

Page 61: IEP Development and Implementation

The Question to Ask

In what way does this student’s disability affect his/her ability to participate / progress in the general education classroom / curriculum?

• Characteristics Related to ASD– Ability to Participate in Instruction– Socialization Skills / Competence– Communication– Independent Skills– Transition Issues– Ability to Manage Stress / Anxiety– Behaviors– OTHERS?

Page 62: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: (compared to

peers)

Impact on Progress in

Gen EdIndependent

Skills

Typical peers are able to navigate the environment

independently without adult prompting or support. They are able to take a break when

needed and complete their assignments with minimal adult prompting / support.

During observations, Jacob needed multiple adult verbal

prompts to complete tasks and transition from activity to

activity. He was not able to independently take a break

when frustrated which resulted in frequent screaming

outbursts. Jacob also was not able to get ready to return home

by getting his materials and putting on his outerwear

without adult supports and prompting.

PLAFFP Statement EXAMPLE

Page 63: IEP Development and Implementation

The Question to Ask

In what way does this student’s disability affect his/her ability to participate / progress in the general education classroom / curriculum?

• Characteristics Related to ASD– Ability to Participate in Instruction– Socialization Skills / Competence– Communication– Independent Skills– Transition Issues– Ability to Manage Stress / Anxiety– Behaviors– OTHERS?

Page 64: IEP Development and Implementation

TEAM TIMEPLAAFP Statement for Target Student

Area Data:

Compared to Peers

Impact on Progress in Gen Ed

Socialization

Independence

ONE MORE OF

YOUR CHOICE

List what data you have for each area / action plan for what

data is needed

What impact does this have on progress in

gen ed

WHAT YOU NEED

• This year’s IEP (PLAAFP & Goals)

• POC Information

• Action Plan Form

• PLAAFP Statement Framework Form

Page 65: IEP Development and Implementation

• Just because there is a NEED does not mean you need a GOAL—

• You MUST address each need within the IEP – don’t necessarily need a goal—– Transition plan– Supplementary Aids / Services– Goals / Objectives

Page 66: IEP Development and Implementation

Identifying Supplementary Aids / Services /

Personnel Supports

Page 67: IEP Development and Implementation

What ARE Supplementary Aids / Services?

--aids, services and other supports that are provided in regular education classes or

other education-related settings to enable children with disabilities to be educated with

non-disabled children to the maximum extent appropriate.

Page 68: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: Impact on Progress in

Gen Ed

What’s Working

What is Needed

Areas preventing

access and/or

impacting progress in gen ed

Data—COMPARED TO PEERS

for each area /

What impact

does this have on progress toward

goals and objectives

What supports / strategies

are currently

being used and are

successful

What supports / strategies need to be continued /

are still needed

PLAFFP Statement Framework

Page 69: IEP Development and Implementation

Supplementary Aids / Services / Personnel Supports

EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES

• Visual Strategies• Functional Communication System• Peer to Peer Support• Paraprofessional• Team Meetings• Training for Staff• Positive Behavior Support Plan• Accommodations / Modifications• OTHERS?

Page 70: IEP Development and Implementation

TEAM TIME

Supplementary Aids, Services,

Personnel Supports for

Target Student

Page 71: IEP Development and Implementation

Next Question:

What needs CANNOT be met through supplementary aids,

services, personnel supports and/or requires specialized instruction

Page 72: IEP Development and Implementation

“Specially Designed Instruction”Michigan Revised Admin Rules 2002

• Adapting, as appropriate to the needs of the student, the content, methodology, or delivery of instruction

– To address the unique needs of the child

– To ensure the child’s access to the general curriculum

Page 73: IEP Development and Implementation

Examples -----

• The SYSTEMS in Supplementary Aids / Services—– Visual Schedule– FCS– Visual Supports– Accommodations / Modifications– OTHERS?

• Mechanism for IMPLEMENTATION

Page 74: IEP Development and Implementation

THESE BECOME YOUR GOALS

AND OBJECTIVES

Page 75: IEP Development and Implementation

Statement of …Measurable annual goals; benchmarks / short term objectives

Annual Goals

Page 76: IEP Development and Implementation

These measurable annual goals must be designed to…

Annual Goals

• Meet child’s needs that result from child’s disability

• Not --Restatement of gen ed curriculum--List of everything the student is expected to learn in every content area

to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum

Page 77: IEP Development and Implementation

What skills does the student need in order to access / master the content rather than what content the student needs to learn.

DISCUSSION

Page 78: IEP Development and Implementation

Whoa….. What about SB-IEP?

• WHY SB-IEP?– MDE Memorandum March 2009

• MDE Quick Reference Guide

Page 79: IEP Development and Implementation

What about academic goals?

• No hard / fast rules

• Things to consider:– 3 tiered system of academic support– Have to know ASD—OUTPUT– Gain Rate vs. Time Spent

Page 80: IEP Development and Implementation

Writing Goals and Objectives / Benchmarks

1. Write broad-based goals with a number of separate but relevant measurable objectives.

2. Write measurable goals with a number of timed benchmarks for the goals.

Page 81: IEP Development and Implementation

Writing a Measurable Goal / Objective

• Utilizing (WHAT CONDITIONS)– Visual Supports– Environmental Condition– Peers– Prompt Level

• Student will do WHAT (behavior—observable / measurable)– to what extent / level– over what period of time

• Measures:– Frequency– Duration

Page 82: IEP Development and Implementation

Recognizing A Good Objective

SMART

• S = Specific

• M = Measurable

• A = Action words (verbs)

• R = Realistic & Relevant (achievable)

• T = Time Limited

Page 83: IEP Development and Implementation

Recognizing A Good Objective

• Who? – will achieve

• What? – skill or behavior

• How? – in what manner or at what level

• Where? – in what setting/ under what conditions

• When? – by what time? Ending date

Page 84: IEP Development and Implementation

Recognizing A Good ObjectiveObservable Behavior

• Verbally label• Verbally express• Point to• Look at • Complete task• Follow Direction• Choose/ select• Raise hand• Remain in seat/area • Answer questions• Draw• Request• Locate/ find• Cut/ Copy/ paste/ color• Put on/ Take off

Conditions:

• Given a request• During transition periods• During social conversation • During structured conversation • During class discussion• When reading a story, • When given 10 problems, questions....• When shown a variety of/ When given a

choice• When prompted ( Identify and specify

type # )• When provided a visual schedule

Page 85: IEP Development and Implementation

Criteria and Mastery

Criteria

• within 5 minutes • 3 out of 4 trials• 4 times weekly• for 40% of trials• 2 times daily • for 5 consecutive

sessions

Mastery

• should be at a 70 % or higher level of success.

• 7 out of 10 trial days• 5 consecutive trial days• 5 consecutive weeks• 8 out of 10 trial days

Page 86: IEP Development and Implementation

Student Name: ___________________________ Date of Progress Report: ___________ Date of IEP: ____________

GOAL AND OBJECTIVES/BENCHMARKS

Instructional Area: ___Content Area - Strand/Domain___ State Standard(s) Upon Which Goal Will Be Based: __GLCE/HSCE/Extended at Grade Level or Not Related__ Baseline Data: _Student_ is currently __________________________________on the __________________________________________________________. Annual Goal: In _#_ instructional weeks, __student__ will ____Domain/Standard/Content Expectation ____ by _____________criteria_____________ on ________________ _____assessment/evaluation__________________. Position(s) Providing Instruction on this Goal: __ Sp Ed Tchr __ Gen Ed Tchr __ TC __ SLI __ SSW __ OT __ PT __ Other: _______________________________ Short-Term Objectives/Major Milestones 1. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

2. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

3. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

4. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

Student Progress Toward Annual Goal

0102030405060708090

100110120

Goal

Student'sProgress

Goal 40 80

Student's Progress

Base line

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th

PROGRESS REPORTING

Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________

Position Responsible for Reporting Progress: Schedule for Evaluation/Reporting Progress: This progress report will be sent home to parents every ___ weeks.

Page 87: IEP Development and Implementation

GOALS / OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

• Marci will have improved functional communication skills for indicating wants and needs.

– Marci will use a system of words, pictures, gestures to indicate basic wants and needs during classroom activities. (8 of 10 trials)

– Marci will use a picture schedule to follow daily classroom routines with minimal prompting. (8 of 10 trials)

– Marci will use a system of words, pictures, gestures to participate in conversational routines with peers. (8 of 10 trials)

Page 88: IEP Development and Implementation

GOALS / OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

• Chris will improve his social communication skills in the classroom setting.

– Chris will raise his hand when he needs assistance or wants to share important information. (90% of time)

– Chris will ask for help and accept teacher response when he doesn’t understand something. (80% of time)

– With gestural prompts from peers and adults, Chris will limit conversational ideas appropriate to the setting. (90% of time)

Page 89: IEP Development and Implementation

GOALS / OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

• Kayla will increase her social communication skills for interaction with adults and peers as measured by mastery of the following objectives.

– Kayla will use appropriate social greetings upon entering and leaving the classroom with teacher and peers (hi, bye) in 8 out of 10 trial days.

– Kayla will expressively identify peers and adults by name in group and play activities with verbal prompting. (4/5 trials)

– Kayla will gain the attention of a communicative partner by verbal or nonverbal means to make a request, to gain assistance, and to engage in activities. (4/5 trials0

Page 90: IEP Development and Implementation

Goals / Objectives Activity

Page 91: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: (compared to Peers

Impact on Progress in Gen

Ed

What’s Working

What is Needed

Social Teacher rating scale: 97% fewer social interactions than others of same age.

Sean talks about Star Wars excessively to peers. He does not have a preferred friend and is alone at lunch and recess.

In the classroom, Sean does not

choose a partner or join a group to work

without adult prompting. He does

participate in cooperative work with peers without argument, which results in adult

intervention and facilitation or Sean having to leave the classroom. Social interactions are

affected by continual Star Wars talk and

communication difficulties.

Adult assignment of peer partner;

Adult facilitation of conflict resolution during small group or partner work;

Star Wars talk in schedule. Pick a peer to talk about Star Wars for 3 minutes.

Peer training to remove adult facilitation;

GOALS / OBJECTIVES?

Page 92: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: (compared to peers)

Impact on Progress in

Gen Ed

What’s Working

What is Needed

Independent Skills

Typical peers are able to navigate the environment independently without adult prompting or

support. They are able to take a

break when needed and

complete their assignments with

minimal adult prompting /

support.

During observations, Jacob needed

multiple adult verbal prompts to complete tasks and transition

from activity to activity. He was not

able to independently take a

break when frustrated which

resulted in frequent screaming outbursts. Jacob also was not able to get ready to

return home by getting his materials and putting on his outerwear without adult supports and

prompting.

Weekly monitored PBS plan

Visual Schedule

Visual prompts

Break Card / Time Away

Active teaching of the visual

schedule

Check schedule card

Pairing verbal prompts with the

visuals – creating more

Pairing of break card with behavior

GOALS / OBJECTIVES Guided Practice

Page 93: IEP Development and Implementation

Area Data: (compared to peers)

Impact on Progress in

Gen Ed

What’s Working

What is Needed

Independent Skills

Typical peers are able to navigate the environment independently without adult prompting or

support. They are able to take a

break when needed and

complete their assignments with

minimal adult prompting /

support.

During observations, Jacob needed

multiple adult verbal prompts to complete tasks and transition

from activity to activity. He was not

able to independently take a

break when frustrated which

resulted in frequent screaming outbursts. Jacob also was not able to get ready to

return home by getting his materials and putting on his outerwear without adult supports and

prompting.

Weekly monitored PBS plan

Visual Schedule

Visual prompts

Break Card / Time Away

Active teaching of the visual

schedule

Check schedule card

Pairing verbal prompts with the

visuals – creating more

Pairing of break card with behavior

GOALS / OBJECTIVES?

Page 94: IEP Development and Implementation

Kayla’s PLAAFP (Using Option II)Area: Social-Communication

Describe specific baseline data compared to same age peers…Teacher rating scale: 86% fewer social interactions than others of same age. Kayla blurts out with unrelated comments and requests for help during instructional time, independent work time and during whole class discussion at an average rate of 20 times per hour; peers average 2-3 blurt outs per hour . Kayla talks excessively about the weather with her peers; peers have a wider range of conversational topics.

Describe how student’s academic, dev, functional needs affect progress in gen ed…In the classroom, Kayla does not offer topic relevant information without adult prompting nor does she participate in cooperative work with peers without continual talking about the weather, which results in adult intervention and facilitation or Kayla having to work independently. Social interactions are affected by continual weather talk. Kayla’s frequent requests for help interfere with her independence as a learner.

Page 95: IEP Development and Implementation

Kayla’s PLAAFPArea: Social-Communication

Describe needs of student that will be addressed in supplemental aids/services, goals…Build weather talk into schedule. Pick a peer to talk about weather with for 3 minutes and give weather reports in the morning;

Peer training to reduce adult intervention;

Visual cue cards related to topic of discussion;

Instruction and visual supports in appropriately requesting help and making comments;

Implementation of system for self-regulation of blurting out.

Explain how student accesses or makes progress in gen ed curriculum based on grade level content standards…(E3.9/E3.10)(1)Utilizing visual supports, visual, verbal, and gestural prompts, and peer support (2) instruction in requesting help and topic maintenance (3) system for self-regulation of blurting out

Page 96: IEP Development and Implementation

GOALS / OBJECTIVES EXAMPLES

• Using visual and verbal prompts, Kayla will increase her social communication skills for interaction with adults and peers as measured by mastery of the following objectives (E3.9/E3.10).

– With a visual prompt, Kayla will ask a topic-related question of the teacher during science and social studies lessons (8/10 lessons).

– With gestural prompts from peers, Kayla will limit conversational ideas appropriate to the topic during cooperative work groups in science and social studies. (8/10 prompts)

– During independent work time, Kayla will gain the attention of a peer or teacher using visual and gestural means to make a request and to gain assistance. (4/5 requests)

Page 97: IEP Development and Implementation

Goals and Objectives Example for ASD

ELA 3.3

When Kayla is………

Self monitoring by applying strategies such as questioning….

(R.MT. 03.01) AndApplying significant knowledge from

grade level science texts…. (R.CM. 03.04)

She is also……..

• Using visual and verbal prompts, Kayla will increase her social communication skills for interaction with adults and peers as measured by mastery of the following objectives (E3.9/E3.10).

– With a visual prompt, Kayla will ask a topic-related question of the teacher during science and social studies lessons (8/10 lessons).(L.CN.03.01)

– With gestural prompts from peers, Kayla will limit conversational ideas appropriate to the topic during cooperative work groups in science and social studies. (8/10 prompts)

(L.CN.03.02)– During independent work time, Kayla

will gain the attention of a peer or teacher using visual and gestural means to make a request and to gain assistance. (4/5 requests)

Page 98: IEP Development and Implementation

TEAM TIME

Developing Goals and Objectives

for Target Student

Page 99: IEP Development and Implementation

Identifying Special Education

Programs / Services and

Ancillary / Related Services

Page 100: IEP Development and Implementation

From the Goals / Objectives…..

• What special education programs / services and/or ancillary / related services are needed.

• THE LRE QUESTION:– With supplementary aids / services AND / OR– Push in ancillary / related services– Can the student make adequate progress on goals and

objectives

• If yes, no pull out program / services is needed…. NO RESTRICTION

• If no, what level of restriction is needed and for what services:– Speech language, OT, PT, etc.– Classroom / Program

Page 101: IEP Development and Implementation

More >><< Less

General Education

Classroom 80%+Target 61%

MI CIMS Thresholds for Restriction

SPP Indicator 5 LRE2009 Targets – Changes

Yearly to 80/80

Continuum of Alternative PlacementsContinuum of Alternative Placements

Restrictive

Removal from the General Education Classroom 21-60%

Removal from the General Education Classroom >60%

Target 12.4

Separate Facility

Target 4.9

Page 102: IEP Development and Implementation

TEAM TIMEDiscussion on

Special Education Programs /

Services and Ancillary / Related

Services for Target Student

Page 103: IEP Development and Implementation

This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the

end of the beginning. Winston S. Churchill

Page 104: IEP Development and Implementation

Implementing the IEP with

Fidelity

Page 105: IEP Development and Implementation

Implementing the IEP

• Fidelity Tools

• Measuring Progress (PROBES)

• Transitions in the IEP Year

Page 106: IEP Development and Implementation

Evidence of Implementation of the IEP Student Name______________________________ Observer:__________________________________ Date:_____________________

Student Schedule Instructional

Outcomes IEP Goals / Objectives

Supports / Services / Strategies

Evidence

Page 107: IEP Development and Implementation

Instructional Outcomes—PURPOSE AND INTENTDifferentiated Instruction

Page 108: IEP Development and Implementation

Measuring Progress

• PROBES—Things to Consider– Who– When– How Often– In What Format– Analysis– Reporting

Page 109: IEP Development and Implementation

Taking Data Probes

• Utilizing a check schedule card, Jason will go to his schedule independently 4/5 transitions.

• Utilizing a visual communication system, Kayla will independently make requests in at least 3 environments.

• Utilizing visual mini schedules, Candice will independently complete a 3 step activity.

Page 110: IEP Development and Implementation

Student Name: ___________________________ Date of Progress Report: ___________ Date of IEP: ____________

GOAL AND OBJECTIVES/BENCHMARKS

Instructional Area: ___Content Area - Strand/Domain___ State Standard(s) Upon Which Goal Will Be Based: __GLCE/HSCE/Extended at Grade Level or Not Related__ Baseline Data: _Student_ is currently __________________________________on the __________________________________________________________. Annual Goal: In _#_ instructional weeks, __student__ will ____Domain/Standard/Content Expectation ____ by _____________criteria_____________ on ________________ _____assessment/evaluation__________________. Position(s) Providing Instruction on this Goal: __ Sp Ed Tchr __ Gen Ed Tchr __ TC __ SLI __ SSW __ OT __ PT __ Other: _______________________________ Short-Term Objectives/Major Milestones 1. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

2. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

3. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

4. By the end of the _#_ marking period _school year_, _student_ will _______________criteria________________ on __________assessment/evaluation___________.

Student Progress Toward Annual Goal

0102030405060708090

100110120

Goal

Student'sProgress

Goal 40 80

Student's Progress

Base line

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th

PROGRESS REPORTING

Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________ Report Date: __________ Progress: ________________________ Comments: __________________________________________________________________________

Position Responsible for Reporting Progress: Schedule for Evaluation/Reporting Progress: This progress report will be sent home to parents every ___ weeks.

Page 111: IEP Development and Implementation

SUMMARY

QUESTIONS / CLARIFICATIONS

5 CONCEPTS to IMPLEMENT


Recommended