+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: arsdy-novalentio
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 24

Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    1/24

    IFRS and Indonesian GAAP (PSAK):similarities and differences

    www.pwc.com/id

    August 2013

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    2/24

    This publication provides a summary of the keydifferences between the Indonesian Financial

    Accounting Standards (IFAS or PSAK) and theInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)that are required for annual reporting periodsbeginning on 1 January 2013.

    This publication does not include the specic

    requirements applicable for listed companies asprescribed by the Capital Market and FinancialInstitutions Supervisory Board (Bapepam-LK)1.Please refer to the other specic publication on thismatter.

    This summary is not a substitute for readingthe accounting standards and interpretationsthemselves. While every effort has been made

    to ensure accuracy, this publication is notcomprehensive and information may have beenomitted which may be relevant to a particular user.

    No responsibility for loss to any person actingor refraining from acting as a result of anymaterial in this publication can be accepted byKAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC).Recipients should not act on the basis of this

    publication without seeking professional advice.No part of this publication may be reproducedby any method without the prior consent of KAPTanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan

    1 Since 31 December 2012, the roles, responsibility andauthority on the supervision of nancial services activities

    at the capital markets sector, insurance, pension funds,multinance, other nancial services institutions weretransferred from the Minister of Finance and Capital Marketand Financial Institution Supervisory Board (Bapepam LK) tothe Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK).

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    3/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 1

    After several major convergence processes during the past threeyears, there is now a substantial alignment between PSAK with theInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), issued by the

    IASB as at 1 January 2009.

    As the convergence process from PSAK to IFRS was performedon a gradual basis, Indonesia has not yet fully adopted IFRS.The Accounting Standards Board of the Indonesian Institute of

    Accountants is now working to align a few remaining update inIFRS that have not been adopted to PSAK. As a result, there are stilla number of differences between IFRS and PSAK that are requiredfor annual reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

    This publication is aimed to highlight these key differences andenable users to better understand in the preparation of the nancialstatements under IFRS and PSAK. You may also refer to the otherPwC publication A practical guide to new IFRSs for 2013 to getfurther understanding over the new IFRSs. We encourage you toconsult your regular PwC contact should you have any questions orcomments regarding this publication or the implementation of thenew accounting standards.

    Eddy RintisAssurance LeaderKAP Tanudiredja,Wibisana & Rekan (PwC)

    August 2013

    Foreword

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    4/24

    2 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    Comparing IFRS/International Accounting Standards (IAS)with PSAK

    Below are the key comparisons between the PSAK and the IFRS2/IAS required for annual

    reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 1 First-timeAdoption ofInternationalFinancial

    ReportingStandards

    - No equivalentstandard

    IFRS 1 will not be adoptedas it has been considered orincluded in the transitionalprovision in the individual

    standards/interpretations.

    IFRS 2 Share-basedPayment

    PSAK 53 Share-basedPayment

    PSAK 53 is consistent with IFRS2 in all signicant respects.

    IFRS 3 BusinessCombinations

    PSAK 22 BusinessCombinations

    Two standards in key principalsare the same, however thereare several minor amendmentsmade to IFRS 3 which have notbeen absorbed by PSAK 22.

    There is a difference inmeasuring non-controllinginterests where IFRS 3 providesclearer requirements (onpresent ownership interestsand entitle their holders toa proportionate share of theentitys net assets in the eventof liquidation) which reduces

    diversity in the application.

    2IFRS in this publication refers to IFRS including IAS, IFRIC and SIC as issued by IASB asof 1 January 2009 unless otherwise stated.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    5/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 3

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 3 also providesapplication guidance onall share-based paymenttransactions that are partof business combinations,

    including unreplaced andvoluntarily replaced share-based payment awards.

    IFRS 4 InsuranceContracts

    PSAK 62

    PSAK 28

    PSAK 36

    InsuranceContracts

    Accounting forLoss Insurance

    Accounting forLife Insurance

    PSAK 62 is adopted from IFRS4 except for the requirementin IFRS 4 to measure theinsurance liabilities on anundiscounted basis becausethis contradicts PSAK 28 and

    PSAK 36.

    PSAK 28 and 36 act ascomplementary to therequirement in PSAK 62.

    There are no standards inIFRS/IAS which are equivalentto PSAK 28 and 36.

    IFRS 5 Non-currentAssets Heldfor Sale andDiscontinuedOperations

    PSAK 58 Non-currentAssets Heldfor Sale andDiscontinuedOperations

    PSAK 58 is consistent with IFRS5 in all signicant respects.

    IFRS 6 Exploration forand Evaluationof MineralResources

    PSAK 64

    PSAK 33

    Explorationand Evaluationof MineralResourcesMining

    StrippingActivities andEnvironmentalManagement inGeneral Mining

    PSAK 64 is consistent with IFRS6 in all signicant respects.

    PSAK 33 provides specicguidelines on general miningin relation to strippingactivities and environmentalmanagement activities. Thereare no standards in IFRS/IAS

    which are equivalent to PSAK33 and thus this additional

    provision may lead to differentaccounting treatment.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    6/24

    4 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 7 FinancialInstruments:Disclosures

    PSAK 60 FinancialInstruments:Disclosures

    There are several amendmentsbeing made to IFRS 7 whichhave not been absorbed byPSAK 60. The main differencesare as follows:

    IFRS 7 requires greaterdisclosure on transferrednancial assets inboth categories of (a)transferred assets thatare not derecognisedin their entirety and(b) transferred assetsthat are derecognised

    in their entirety. Thesecond category has moreextensive disclosuresrequirements.

    Subsequent to 2009,there are amendments in2011 to IFRS 7 and IAS32 effective for nancialstatements beginning on

    or after 1 January 2013and 2014, respectively,

    which clarify the rightof set-off, the grosssettlement mechanism,and further disclosurerequirements (i.e.quantitative informationabout recognised nancialinstruments that areoffset in the statementof nancial position, as

    well as those recognisednancial instrumentsthat are subject tomaster netting or similararrangements irrespectiveof whether they are offset).Refer to other PwC rm

    publication A practicalguide to new IFRSs for2013 for further details.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    7/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 5

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 8 OperatingSegments

    PSAK 5 OperatingSegments

    PSAK 5 is consistent with IFRS8 in all signicant respects.

    IFRS 9(revised2010 )

    FinancialInstruments

    PSAK 55adopted fromIAS 39, refer tosection belowon IAS 39 andPSAK 55 forfurther details.

    IFRS 9 (revised 2010) has notbeen adopted in Indonesia. ForIFRS reporters, it is effectivefrom 1 January 2015 and it canbe adopted with immediateeffect. IFRS 9 replaces IAS 39.

    This standard includesguidance on the classicationand measurement of nancialassets and nancial liabilitiesand the derecognition ofnancial instruments.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guideto new IFRSs for 2013 forfurther details.

    IFRS 10(2011)

    ConsolidatedFinancialStatements

    PSAK 4 adoptedfrom IAS 27,refer to sectionbelow on IAS 27

    and PSAK 4 forfurther details.

    IFRS 10 (2011) has not beenadopted in Indonesia. For IFRSreporters, it is effective from 1January 2013 and it changes

    the denition of control.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guideto new IFRSs for 2013 forfurther details.

    IFRS 11(2011)

    JointArrangements

    PSAK 12adopted fromIAS 31, refer tosection belowon IAS 28 andPSAK 15 forfurther details.

    IFRS 11 (2011) has not beenadopted in Indonesia. For IFRSreporters, it is effective from1 January 2013 and it reducesthe types of joint arrangementsto joint operations and joint

    ventures, and prohibits the useof proportional consolidation.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guideto new IFRSs for 2013

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    8/24

    6 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IFRS 12(2011)

    Disclosure ofInterests inOther Entities

    PSAK 4, 12 dan15 adoptedfrom IAS 27, 28and 31, refer to

    sections belowon IAS 27 andPSAK 4; IAS28 and PSAK15; IAS 31 andPSAK 12.

    IFRS 12 (2011) has not beenadopted in Indonesia. ForIFRS reporters, it is effectivefrom 1 January 2013 and it

    brings together in one standardthe disclosure requirementsthat apply to investments insubsidiaries, associates, joint

    ventures, structured entities,and unconsolidated structuredentities.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guide

    to new IFRSs for 2013 forfurther details.

    IFRS 13(2011)

    Fair ValueMeasurement

    No equivalentstandard underPSAK.

    IFRS 13 (2011) has not beenadopted in Indonesia. For IFRSreporters, it is effective from1 January 2013 and it coversfair value measurements anddisclosures.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guideto new IFRSs for 2013 forfurther details.

    IAS 1 Presentationof FinancialStatements

    PSAK 1 Presentationof FinancialStatements

    PSAK 1 is consistent with IAS1 in all signicant respects,except for the following:

    PSAK 1 denes IndonesianFinancial Accounting

    Standards (IFAS)as consisting of theStatements of Financial

    Accounting Standards,their interpretations andnancial reporting rulesissued by capital marketauthorities. IAS 1 does notinclude the latter.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    9/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 7

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    Unlike IAS 1, PSAK 1disallows an entity to usetitles for the nancialstatements other than

    those used in PSAK 1.PSAK 1 however allows theentity to use balance sheetsinstead of the statement ofnancial position.

    Under PSAK 1, wherecompliance with the PSAK

    would be so misleadingthat it would conict

    with the objectives of thenancial statements, anentity is not allowed todepart from the relevantstandards; however itmay disclose the factthat: (a) the applicationof those standards wouldbe misleading and (b)alternative reporting

    basis should be applied toachieve fair presentationof nancial statements.IAS 1, under similarcircumstances, allowsfor departure from theprevailing standards.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    10/24

    8 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    Subsequent to 2009,there is an amendmentto IAS 1 (revised 2011)Presentation of nancial

    statements which appliesfrom 1 July 2012. Suchamendment changes thepresentation requirementof Other ComprehensiveIncome (OCI) item. Entitiesare required to presentOCI into two separategroups i.e. items that willbe recycled to prot and

    loss in the future and itemsthat will not be recycled.Entities that choose topresent OCI items beforetax will be required toshow the amount of taxrelated to the two groupsseparately. Refer to otherPwC rm publication Apractical guide to newIFRSs for 2013 for furtherdetails.

    IAS 2 Inventories PSAK 14 Inventories PSAK 14 is consistent with IAS2 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 7 Statement ofCash Flows

    PSAK 2 Statement ofCash Flows

    PSAK 2 is consistent with IAS 7in all signicant respects.

    IAS 8 AccountingPolicies,

    Changes inAccountingEstimates andErrors

    PSAK 25 AccountingPolicies,

    Changes inAccountingEstimates andErrors

    PSAK 25 is consistent with IAS8 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 10 Events afterthe ReportingPeriod

    PSAK 8 Events afterthe ReportingPeriod

    PSAK 8 is consistent with IAS10 in all signicant respects,except that IAS 10 requiresdisclosure in cases whereowners or other parties havethe power to amend nancialstatements after issue.PSAK does not require suchdisclosure.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    11/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 9

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 11 ConstructionContracts

    PSAK 34 ConstructionContracts

    PSAK 34 is consistent with IAS11 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 12 Income Taxes PSAK 46 Income Taxes IAS 12 contains an exception tothe measurement of deferred

    tax assets or liabilities arisingon investment propertymeasured at fair value whichassumed that an investmentproperty is recovered entirelythrough sale.

    PSAK 46 regulates severalitems that are not covered byIAS 12, i.e. (a) nal income tax

    (no deferred tax applicable,recognition and presentationof the related nal income taxexpense and balance) and (b)specic rules with regard to taxassessment letters (mainly onthe recognition of additionaltax expenses/income arisingfrom the tax examination

    letters).IAS 16 Property, Plant

    and EquipmentPSAK 16

    ISAK 25

    Fixed Assets

    Land Rights

    PSAK 16 is consistent with IAS16 in all signicant respects.PSAK 16 provides referenceto ISAK 25 in relation to landrights.

    ISAK 25 still maintains thatland that is held under HGB,HGU and Hak Pakai rights is

    not amortised unless there isan indication that the renewalor extension of the rights isnot probable or cannot beobtained. Costs to obtain thoserights for the rst time arecapitalized as xed assets butsubsequent costs to extend orrenew the rights are recognisedas intangible assets and then

    amortised based on paragraph11 of ISAK 25.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    12/24

    10 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 17 Leases PSAK 30 Leases PSAK 30 is consistent with IAS17 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 18 Revenue PSAK 23 Revenue PSAK 23 is consistent with IAS18 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 19 EmployeeBenets

    PSAK 24 EmployeeBenets

    Subsequent to 2009, there isa revision to IAS 19 (revised2011) Employee Benetsapplicable from 1 January2013 which had a signicantimpact on most entities dueto change in the recognitionand measurement of denedbenet pensions expenses

    and termination benets,and the disclosures required.In particular, actuarial gainsand losses can no longer bedeferred using the corridorapproach.

    Refer to other PwC rmpublication A practical guideto new IFRSs for 2013 for

    further details.IAS 20 Accounting for

    GovernmentGrants andDisclosure ofGovernment

    Assistance

    PSAK 61 Accounting forGovernmentGrants andDisclosure ofGovernment

    Assistance

    PSAK 61 is consistent with IAS20 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 21 The Effectsof Changes

    in ForeignExchange Rates

    PSAK 10 The Effectsof Changes

    in ForeignExchange Rates

    PSAK 10 is consistent with IAS21 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 23 BorrowingCosts

    PSAK 26 BorrowingCosts

    PSAK 26 is consistent with IAS23 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 24 Related PartyDisclosures

    PSAK 7 Related PartyDisclosures

    PSAK 7 is consistent with IAS24 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 26 Accountingand Reportingby RetirementBenet Plans

    PSAK 18 Accountingand Reportingby RetirementBenet Plans

    PSAK 18 is consistent with IAS26 in all signicant respects.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    13/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 11

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 27 Consolidatedand SeparateFinancialStatements

    PSAK 4 Consolidatedand SeparateFinancialStatements

    PSAK 4 is consistent with IAS27 in all signicant respects,except that:

    1. Unlike IAS 27, PSAK 4does not allow a parententity to present itsown separate nancialstatements as standalonegeneral purpose nancialstatements. PSAK 4stipulates that the separatenancial statementshave to be presented

    as supplementaryinformation to theconsolidated nancialstatements.

    2. PSAK 4 does notprovide an exemptionfor the parent entityfrom consolidating thenancial statements of its

    subsidiaries. All parententities are required topresent the consolidatednancial statements.Under IAS 27, such anexemption exists providedcertain criteria are met.

    From 1 January 2013, IAS27 (revised 2011) Separate

    nancial statements onlydeals with separate nancialstatements. Consolidatednancial statements arecovered by IFRS 10 asdescribed above.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    14/24

    12 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 28 Investments inAssociates

    PSAK 15 Investments inAssociates

    PSAK 15 is consistent with IAS28 in all signicant respects,except that under IAS 28,an entity or an investor is

    exempted from applying theequity method of accountingfor its associates if they meetcertain criteria. In this case,the investor prepares separatenancial statements as theironly nancial statementsand records investments inassociates, either at cost or inaccordance with IAS 39.

    From 1 January 2013, IAS 28(revised 2011) Associates and

    joint ventures covers equityaccounting for joint venturesand associates.

    IAS 29 FinancialReporting inHyperination-

    ary Economies

    PSAK 63 FinancialReporting inHyperination-

    ary Economies

    PSAK 63 is consistent with IAS29 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 31 Interests inJoint Ventures

    PSAK 12 Interests inJoint Ventures

    PSAK 12 is consistent with IAS31 in all signicant respects.But while both PSAK 12 andIAS 31 allow either the equitymethod or the proportionateconsolidation method, PSAK12 puts more emphasis on theequity method, whereas IAS 31recommends the proportionate

    consolidation method.

    IAS 32 FinancialInstruments:Presentation

    PSAK 50 FinancialInstruments:Presentation

    PSAK 50 is consistent with IAS32 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 33 Earnings perShare

    PSAK 56 Earnings perShare

    PSAK 56 is consistent with IAS33 in all signicant respects.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    15/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 13

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 34 InterimFinancialReporting

    PSAK 3 InterimFinancialReporting

    PSAK 3 is consistent with IAS34 in all signicant respects.

    However, under the prevailing

    capital market regulations,listed companies are requiredonly to report cumulative

    year-to-date information (andrelated comparatives) for theStatement of ComprehensiveIncome (SoCI) and are notrequired to present currentinterim period SoCI.

    IAS 36 Impairment of

    Assets

    PSAK 48 Impairment of

    Assets

    PSAK 48 is consistent with IAS

    36 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 37 Provisions,ContingentLiabilities andContingent

    Assets

    PSAK 57 Provisions,ContingentLiabilities andContingent

    Assets

    PSAK 57 is consistent with IAS37 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 38 IntangibleAssets

    PSAK 19 IntangibleAssets

    PSAK 19 is consistent with IAS38 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 39 FinancialInstruments:RecognitionandMeasurement

    PSAK 55 FinancialInstruments:RecognitionandMeasurement

    There are several amendmentsbeing made in the IAS 39which has not been absorbedby PSAK 55.

    PSAK 55 is consistent with IAS39 in all signicant respectsexcept for IAS 39 includesseveral amendments withregard to:

    the prohibition of thereclassication of a hybrid(combined) contract outof the fair value throughprot or loss category

    when the entity is unableto separately measure anembedded derivative;

    further clarication onthe scope exemption

    to forward contract forbusiness combination.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    16/24

    14 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRS PSAK Differences

    IAS 40 InvestmentProperty

    PSAK 13 InvestmentProperty

    PSAK 13 is consistent with IAS40 in all signicant respects.

    IAS 41 Agriculture No equivalentstandard under

    PSAK.

    IAS 41 will be adopted afterit is revised by the IASB. The

    IAS 41 model currently is notconsidered to be compatible

    with the agricultural activitiesin Indonesia, most of whichare bearer biological assets.Unlike IAS 41 that requires theagriculture to be measured atfair value, the accounting foragriculture under PSAK is stillbased on historical costs.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    17/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 15

    Comparing the Interpretation of IFRS (IFRIC and SIC)and Indonesian Interpretation of Financial AccountingStandards (ISAK)

    Below are the key comparisons between the ISAK and the IFRIC Interpretation(IFRIC)3required for annual reporting periods beginning on 1 January 2013.

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 1 Changes in ExistingDecommissioning,Restoration andSimilar Liabilities

    ISAK 9 Changes in ExistingDecommissioning,Restoration andSimilar Liabilities

    ISAK 9 is consistent withIFRIC 1 in all signicantrespects.

    IFRIC 2 Members Sharesin Co-operativeEntities and SimilarInstruments

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 2 is not adoptedsince cooperatives inIndonesia do not issueshares to its members.

    IFRIC 4 Determiningwhether anArrangementcontains a Lease

    ISAK 8 Determiningwhether anArrangementContains a Lease

    ISAK 8 is consistent withIFRIC 4 in all signicantrespects.

    IFRIC 5 Rights to Interestsarising fromDecommissioning,Restoration andEnvironmentalRehabilitationFunds

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 5 is not adopted.

    IFRIC 6 Liabilities arisingfrom Participatingin a Specic Market

    - Waste Electricaland ElectronicEquipment

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    IFRIC 6 is not adopted.

    3IFRIC in this publication refers to IFRIC including SIC as issued by IASB as of 1 January2009 unless otherwise stated.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    18/24

    16 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 7 Applying theRestatement

    Approach underIAS 29Financial

    Reporting inHyperinfationaryEconomies

    ISAK 19 Applying theRestatement

    Approach underPSAK 63:Financial

    Reporting inHyperinfationaryEconomies

    ISAK 19 is consistentwith IFRIC 7 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 9 Reassessmentof EmbeddedDerivatives

    ISAK 26 Reassessmentof EmbeddedDerivatives

    ISAK 26 is consistentwith IFRIC 9 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 10 Interim FinancialReporting andImpairment

    ISAK 17 Interim FinancialReporting andImpairment

    ISAK 17 is consistentwith IFRIC 10 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 12 Service ConcessionArrangements

    ISAK 16 Service ConcessionArrangements

    ISAK 16 is consistentwith IFRIC 12 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 13 Customer LoyaltyProgrammes

    ISAK 10 Customer LoyaltyProgrammes

    ISAK 10 is consistentwith IFRIC 13 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 14 IAS 19 - The Limiton a DenedBenet Asset,

    Minimum FundingRequirements andtheir Interaction

    ISAK 15 PSAK 24 - TheLimit on a DenedBenet Asset,

    Minimum FundingRequirements andtheir Interaction

    There are severalamendments made inthe IFRIC 14 which has

    not been absorbed byISAK 15.

    There are differencesin determining theeconomic benetavailable as a reductionin future contributionsin the condition ofno minimum fundingrequirement or witha minimum fundingrequirement.

    Under the IFRIC 14,any surplus arisingfrom voluntary pre-payment of minimumfunding contribution inrespect of future serviceshould be recognised

    as an asset when thereis a minimum fundingrequirement.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    19/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 17

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 15 Agreements for theConstruction ofReal Estate

    PSAK 44

    ISAK 21

    Accountingfor Real EstateDevelopment

    Agreements for theConstruction ofReal Estate

    There are differencesin the accounting forreal estate developmentbetween PSAK 44 and

    IFRIC 15.

    PSAK 44 regulatesspecic provisions

    with regard to revenuerecognition of differenttypes of real estatedevelopment, costcomponents, allowanceallocation and

    disclosures.

    IFRIC 15 however is abroader interpretationof the accounting forrevenue and associatedexpenses by entitiesthat undertake theconstruction of realestate directly or

    through subcontractors.IFRIC 15 addresses

    whether the agreementfalls within the scopeof IAS 11 (ConstructionContracts) or IAS 18(Revenue) and whenthe revenue fromthe construction ofreal estate should berecognised.

    ISAK 21 is consistentwith IFRIC 15 in allsignicant respects.However, the differenceremains as the effectivedate of ISAK 21 isdelayed awaiting thecompletion of ED IFRSon revenue.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    20/24

    18 IFRS and PSAK differences 2012

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 16 Hedges of a NetInvestment in aForeign Operation

    ISAK 13 Hedges of a NetInvestment in aForeign Operation

    ISAK 13 is consistentwith IFRIC 16 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 17 Distributions of

    Non-cash Assets toOwners

    ISAK 11 Distributions of

    Non-cash Assets toOwners

    ISAK 11 is consistent

    with IFRIC 17 in allsignicant respects.

    IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assetsfrom Customers

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK4.

    IFRIC 18 has not beenadopted in Indonesia.For IFRS reporters,IFRIC 18 has beenapplicable since 1 July2009.

    IFRIC 18 addresses thediversity in practicethat has arisen whenentities account forassets transferred froma customer in return forconnection to a networkor ongoing access togoods or services, orboth.

    IFRIC 19 ExtinguishingFinancial Liabilities

    with EquityInstruments

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK4.

    IFRIC 19 has not beenadopted in Indonesia.For IFRS reporters, it hasbeen applicable since 1July 2010.

    IFRIC 19 addresses theaccounting by an entitythat renegotiates theterms of a nancialliability and issuesshares to the creditor toextinguish all or part ofthe nancial liability.

    4On July 2013, DSAK-IAI has issued new ISAKs which are ISAK 27 and ISAK 28 and willbe effectively applied for period beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Those standards areadopted from IFRIC 18 and IFRIC 19. Please refer to PwC rm publication A practical guideto new PSAKs for 2014 for further detail.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    21/24

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    IFRIC 20 Stripping costs inthe productionphase of a surfacemine

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK5.

    IFRIC 20 has not beenadopted in Indonesia.For IFRS reporters, it iseffective from 1 January

    2013.

    IFRIC 20 sets outthe accounting foroverburden wasteremoval (stripping)costs in the productionphase of a mine.

    SIC-7 Introduction of theEuro

    No equivalentinterpretation

    under PSAK.

    SIC 7 is not adopted.For IFRS reporters, it is

    effective from 1 January1998.

    SIC-10 GovernmentAssistance-NoSpecic Relation toOperating Activities

    ISAK 18 GovernmentAssistance-NoSpecic Relation toOperating Activities

    ISAK 18 is consistentwith SIC 10 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-12 Consolidation-Special PurposeEntities

    ISAK 7 Consolidation-Special PurposeEntities

    ISAK 7 is consistent withSIC 12 in all signicantrespects.

    SIC-13 Jointly ControlledEntities-Non-MonetaryContributions by

    Venturers

    ISAK 12 Jointly ControlledEntities-Non-MonetaryContributions by

    Venturers

    ISAK 12 is consistentwith SIC 13 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-15 Operating Leases-Incentives

    ISAK 23 Operating Leases-Incentives

    ISAK 23 is consistentwith SIC 15 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-25 Income Taxes-Changes in the TaxStatus of an Entityor its Shareholders

    ISAK 20 Income Taxes-Changes in the TaxStatus of an Entityor its Shareholders

    ISAK 20 is consistentwith SIC 25 in allsignicant respects.

    5On July 2013, DSAK-IAI has issued new ISAK which is ISAK 29 and will be effectivelyapplied for period beginning on or after 1 January 2014. The standard is adopted fromIFRIC 20. Please refer to PwC rm publication A practical guide to new PSAKs for 2014for further detail.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    22/24

    20 IFRS and PSAK differences 2013

    IFRIC / SIC ISAK Differences

    SIC-27 Evaluating theSubstance ofTransactionsInvolving the Legal

    Form of a Lease

    ISAK 24 Evaluating theSubstance ofTransactionsInvolving the Legal

    Form of a Lease

    ISAK 24 is consistentwith SIC 27 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-29 Service ConcessionArrangements:Disclosures

    ISAK 22 Service ConcessionArrangements:Disclosures

    ISAK 22 is consistentwith SIC 29 in allsignicant respects.

    SIC-31 Revenue-BarterTransactionsInvolving

    AdvertisingServices

    No equivalentinterpretationunder PSAK.

    SIC-31 is not adopted.

    SIC-32 Intangible Assets-Web Site Costs

    ISAK 14 Intangible Assets-Web Site Costs

    ISAK 14 is consistentwith SIC 32 in allsignicant respects.

    There are other specic PSAKs that have no equivalent standards under IFRS i.e.:

    PSAK 38: Akuntansi Restrukturisasi Entitas Sepengendali /Accounting forRestructuring Under Common Control Entities

    The objective of this standard is to specify the accounting for restructuring undercommon control entities which has not been covered by PSAK 22 BusinessCombinations.

    A restructuring transaction which occurred within under common control entities isconsidered to have no economic substance, despite any legal form transfer betweenthe entities.

    PSAK 45: Pelaporan Keuangan Entitas Nirlaba /Financial Reporting for Non-Proft Organisations

    The objective of this standard is to specify the nancial reporting for non-protorganisations.

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    23/24

    IFRS and PSAK differences 2013 21

    Djohan Pinnarwan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Marcel Irawan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    For professional accounting advice,please contact:

    Jumadi Anggana+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Jasmin Maranan+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Ketty Tedja+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Helen Cuizon+62 21 528 [email protected]

    Authors, contributors,and reviewers

  • 8/11/2019 ifrs-psak-comparison-2013.pdf

    24/24

    PwC IndonesiaPlaza 89

    Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav. X-7 No.6Jakarta 12940 - INDONESIAP.O. Box 2473 JKP 10001Telp: +62 21 5212901Fax: +62 21 5290 5555/5290 5050

    This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for

    consultation with professional advisors.

    2013 KAP Tanudiredja, Wibisana & Rekan. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the Indonesia member

    rm and may sometimes refer to the PwC network Each member rm is a separate legal entity


Recommended