+ All Categories
Home > Technology > IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Date post: 07-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: grssieee
View: 636 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
39
Integrating GPS and InSAR to Measure Moment Rates along the San Andreas Fault System David T. Sandwell, Meng Wei, Xiaopeng Tong, Bridget Smith-Konter IGARSS, July 28, 2011
Transcript
Page 1: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Integrating GPS and InSAR to Measure Moment Rates along the San Andreas Fault System

David T. Sandwell, Meng Wei, Xiaopeng Tong, Bridget Smith-Konter

IGARSS, July 28, 2011

Page 2: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

IntegratingGPS and InSAR

• strain rate and seismic moment rate measure earthquake potential

• strain rate not well resolved by GPS, need InSAR

• L-band correlation >> C-band (Rosen et al., 1996; Wei and Sandwell, 2010)

• remove-filter-stack-restore to integrate GPS and InSAR

• SAF results

• need MORE L-band data, ALOS-2 and DESDynI

[data from JAXA and provided through the ASF; funding - NASA, Geodetic Imaging]

Page 3: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

M = µΛ(∆ − δ)ς Τ&ΜΛ

= µς (∆ − δ)

Page 4: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

strain rate

&ε =

V

p d=

velocity

locking depth

&M

L= µς ∆

moment rate

Page 5: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

IntegratingGPS and InSAR

• strain rate and seismic moment rate measure earthquake potential

• strain rate not well resolved by GPS, need InSAR

• L-band correlation >> C-band (Rosen et al., 1996; Wei and Sandwell, 2010)

• remove-filter-stack-restore to integrate GPS and InSAR

• SAF results

• need MORE L-band data, ALOS-2 and DESDynI

[data from JAXA and provided through the ASF; funding - NASA, Geodetic Imaging]

Page 6: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

strain rates from 16 groups

Page 7: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

InSAR can resolve near-fault velocity

need ~2 mm/yr precision

Page 8: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

IntegratingGPS and InSAR

• strain rate and seismic moment rate measure earthquake potential

• strain rate not well resolved by GPS, need InSAR

• L-band correlation >> C-band (Rosen et al., 1996; Wei and Sandwell, 2010)

• remove-filter-stack-restore to integrate GPS and InSAR

• SAF results

• need MORE L-band data, ALOS-2 and DESDynI

[data from JAXA and provided through the ASF; funding - NASA, Geodetic Imaging]

Page 9: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

interseismic vector velocity model

east north up

[Smith-Konter and Sandwell, 2009]

Page 10: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

locked zone

InterseismicLOSVelocity

high-passfilteredλ < 40 km

ALOShas the best sensitivityto interseismic motion.

ERSascending

ERSdescending

ALOSascending

ALOSdescending

[Wei et al., 2010]

Page 11: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

locked zone

InterseismicLOSVelocity

high-passfilteredλ < 40 km

Ascending ALOS has 8-20 repeats

ERS/Envisatascending

ERS/Envisatdescending

ALOSascending

ALOSdescending

poorcorrelation

poorcorrelation

too fewrepeats

[Wei et al., 2010]

Page 12: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

remove/restore this LOS model

Page 13: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

align and stack with GMTSARunwrap phase with snaphu[Chen and Zebker, 2002]

Page 14: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

IntegratingGPS and InSAR

• strain rate and seismic moment rate measure earthquake potential

• strain rate not well resolved by GPS, need InSAR

• L-band correlation >> C-band (Rosen et al., 1996; Wei and Sandwell, 2010)

• remove-filter-stack-restore to integrate GPS and InSAR

• SAF results

• need MORE L-band data, ALOS-2 and DESDynI

[data from JAXA and provided through the ASF; funding - NASA, Geodetic Imaging]

Page 15: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

mean LOS red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

std edit > 6 mm/yr

Page 16: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

southern SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 17: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

southern SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 18: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

San Jacinto stepover red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 19: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

San Jacinto stepover red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 20: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

LA Basin red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 21: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

LA Basin red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 22: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Parkfield SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 23: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Parkfield SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 24: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Creeping SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 25: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Creeping SAF red 10 mm/yrblue -10mm/yr

Page 26: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Creeping SAF

LOS error~4 mm/yr

Page 27: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 28: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 29: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 30: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 31: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 32: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 33: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 34: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 35: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 36: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 37: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

frame processing

Page 38: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

Conclusions

•strain rate and seismic moment rate measure earthquake potential

•combining GPS and InSAR provides full spatial resolution

•C-band InSAR does not have adequate coherence for interseismic studies

•ALOS provides 10-20, long time span (2.4 yr), interferograms along ascending orbits resulting in 4 mm/yr noise. ~ 800 SAR images were used for this analysis.

•Need more repeats as well as descending coverage from ALOS-2 and DESDynI to achieve 2 mm/yr. Need > 60 repeats for each of 58 frames or ~3400 scenes.[data from JAXA and provided through the ASF; funding - NASA, Geodetic Imaging]

Page 39: IGARSS_2011_sandwell.ppt

interseismic model

velocity

strain rate

momentrate

v(x) =ςπ

ταν−1 ξ∆

&ε x( ) =V

p D

1

1+x

Dæèç

öø÷

2

&M

L= µς ∆

= velocity depth

= velocity X depth