Iges Meth Parameter 110830

7/31/2019 Iges Meth Parameter 110830

1/220

IGES CDM Methodology List

IGES CDM Methodology Parameter Data

IGES CDM Methodology Parameter Data organizes CDM methodologies based on the equations of emission reduction calculations including baseline

emissions, Project Emissions, and monitoring methodology while summarizing all the parameters used in the calculations.

The "Summary" sheet organizes default values defined in the methodology for easy reference and assistance for the development of standardized

baselines. Those parameters applying default values are highlighted in yellow.

In this sheet, methodologies are selected from those frequently used in the CDM pipeline. All methodologies in this sheet are based UNFCCC's

documents from the link below.

http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/index.html

The adopted methodologies are followings (according to the project types):

Renewable Energy

ACM0002 (ver.12.1) Consolidated methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources

AMS-I.A. (ver.14) Electricity generation by the user

AMS-I.C. (ver.19) Thermal energy production with or without electricity

AMS-I.D. (ver.17) Grid connected renewable electricity generation

AMS-I.F. (ver.2) Renewable electricity generation for captive use and mini-grid

Biomass

ACM0006 (ver.11.1) Consolidated methodology for electricity and heat generation from biomass residues

Waste Gas or Heat

ACM0012 (ver.4) Consolidated baseline methodology for GHG emission reductions from waste energy recovery projects

ACM0009 (ver.3.2) Consolidated methodology for industrial fuel switching from coal or petroleum fuels to natural gas

AMS-II.I. (ver.1) Efficient utilization of waste energy in industrial facilities

AMS-III.P. (ver.1) Recovery and utilization of waste gas in refinery facilities

AMS-III.Q. (ver.4) Waste Energy Recovery (gas/heat/pressure) Projects

Fuel Switch

AMS-III.B. (ver.15) Switching fossil fuels

Energy Efficiency - Supply Side

ACM0013 (ver.4) Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants using a less

GHG intensive technology

AMS-II.B. (ver.9) Supply side energy efficiency improvements generation

Energy Efficiency - Demand Side

AMS-II.D. (ver.12) Energy efficiency and fuel switching measures for industrial facilities

AMS-II.J. (ver.4) Demand-side activities for efficient lighting technologies

Biofuel

ACM0017 (ver.2) Production of biodiesel for use as fuel

Cement

ACM0003 (ver.7.4) Emissions reduction through partial substitution of fossil fuels with alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fuels in

cement manufacture

ACM0005 (ver.5) Consolidated Methodology for Increasing the Blend in Cement Production

ACM0015 (ver.3) Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for project activities using alternative raw materials that do not

contain carbonates for clinker manufacturing in cement kilns

Biogas

AMS-III.D. (ver.17) Methane recovery in animal manure management systemsAMS-III.H. (ver.16) Methane recovery in wastewater treatment

Landfill Gas

ACM0001 (ver.11) Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for landfill gas project activities

AMS-III.G. (ver.6) Landfill methane recovery


2/220


Composting

AMS-III.F. (ver.10) Avoidance of methane emissions through controlled biological treatment of biomass

Methodological Tools

Methodological Tool 3 (ver.2) Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion

Methodological Tool4 (ver.5) Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site

Whilst the information in this sheet is believed to be true and accurate on the date of going to press, neither the editor nor publisher can accept any

legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may have been made. For any queries relating to this calculation sheet, please contact

[email protected]. All copyrights are reserved. The source must be clearly stated when this calculation sheet is reproduced or transmitted in any

form or by any means.

Authors: Kazuhisa KOAKUTSU , Kentaro TAKAHASHI, Naoki TORII, Akiko FUKUI, Akihisa KURIYAMA

Market Mechanism Group, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES)

Last update 2011/08/29


3/220


Summary of Default Values

Methodology Name Parameters Default Value Unit Conditions

ACM 0001Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology

for landfill gas project activities

Methane density expressed in tonnes of methane per cubic

meter of methane0.0007168 tCH4/m3CH4

At standard temperature and pressure (0

degree Celsius and 1,013 bar)

0002Consolidated methodology for grid-connected

electricity generation from renewable sources

Quantity of net electricity generation that is produced and fedinto the grid as a result of the implementation of the CDM

project activity in year y

0 MWh/yr on/after DATEBaselineRetrofit

Project emissions in year y 0 tCO2e/yr

not in the case using fossile fuel and

emitting from geothermal power plant and

hydro power plant.

Project emissions from water reservoirs 0 tCO2e/yrIf the power density of the project activity

(PD) is greater than 10 W/m2:

Installed capacity of the hydro power plant before the

implementation of the project activity0 W For new hydro power plants

Area of the reservoir measured in the surface of the water,

before the implementation of the project activity, when the

reservoir is full

0 m2 For new reservoirs

0003Emissions reduction through partial substitution of

fossil fuels with alternative fuels or less carbon

intensive fuels in cement manufacture

Net calorific value of the fossil fuel type i in year yregional/national/IP

CCGJ/ton

In the case that values provided by the fuel

supplier in invoices or mesured are not

available

Net calorific value of the alternative or less carbon intensive

fuel type k in year y

regional/national/IP

CCGJ/ton



available

Carbon dioxide emission factor for fossil fuel type i in year yregional/national/IP

CCtCO2/GJ

0 for the case; Wastes originating from

fossil sources where W1 has been identified

as the most plausible baseline scenario; -

Biomass residues; - Renewable biomass



available,use defaule of

regional/national/IPCC

CH4 emission factor for uncontrolled burning of the biomass

residue type k during the year y0.0027-0.001971 tCH4/GJ

0.0027 :in the absence of more accurate

information,

0005Consolidated Methodology for Increasing the Blend

in Cement ProductionStoichiometric emission factor for CaO 0.785 tCO2/t CaO

Stoichiometric emission factor for MgO 1.092 tCO2/t MgO

0006Consolidated methodology for electricity and heat

generation from biomass residues

The default value for the losses linked to the electricity

generator group (turbine, couplings and electricity generator.

Set at 0.05)

0.5 ratio

Default CH4 emission factors for combustion of biomass

residues (Wood waste)30 kg CH4 / TJ

2006 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 2, Chapter

2, Tables 2.2 to 2.6.


residues (Sulphite lyes (Black Liquor))3 kg CH4 / TJ


2, Tables 2.2 to 2.6.


residues( Other solid biomass residues)30 kg CH4 / TJ


2, Tables 2.2 to 2.6.


4/220


0013Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology

for new grid connected fossil fuel fired power plants

using a less GHG intensive technology

Not defined

0015

onso a e ase ne an mon or ng me o o ogy

for project activities using alternative raw materials

that do not contain carbonates for clinkerCO2 emission factor for fuel type i

regional/national/IP

CCtCO2/GJ

Net calorific value of the fuel type iregional/national/IP

CC

GJ/mass or

volume units

0017 Production of biodiesel for use as a fuelDefault emission factor for the GHG emissions associated with

the cultivation of land to produce oil seed type s

Crop: Palm Methyl Esther / Climate zone: Tropical Moist 1.87 tCO2e/ha

Crop: Palm Methyl Esther / Climate zone: Tropical Wet 1.87 tCO2e/ha

Crop: Jatropha Methyl Ester / Climate zone: Tropical Moist 1.76 tCO2e/ha

Crop: Jatropha Methyl Ester / Climate zone: Tropical Dry 2.52 tCO2e/ha

AMS I.A. Electricity generation by the user

Average technical distribution losses that would have been

observed in diesel powered mini-grids installed by public

programmes or distribution companies in isolated areas,

expressed as a fraction

20%/0

CO2 emission factor 0.8 kg CO2-e/kWhesm sson s er ve rom ese

Project emissions 0 tCO2no n e case o geo erma power p an s

I.C. Thermal energy production with or without electricity Not defined

I.D. Grid connected renewable electricity generation Not defined

I.F.Renewable electricity generation for captive use and

mini-gridNot defined

II.B.Supply side energy efficiency improvements

generation (cont)Not defined

II.D.Energy efficiency and fuel switching measures for

industrial facilitiesNot defined

II.I.Efficient utilization of waste energy in industrial

Not defined

II.J.Demand-side activities for efficient lighting

technologies

Average annual technical grid losses (transmission and

distribution) during year y for the grid serving the locations

where the devices are installed, expressed as a fraction.

10%

Net-to-gross adjustment factor, a default value of 0.95 is to be

used unless a more appropriate value based on a lighting use

survey from the same region and not older than 2 years is

available

0.95

Average daily operating hours of the lighting devices replaced

by the group of ilighting devices.3.5 hrs/day option (a) 3.5 hours per 24 hour period

III.B. Switching fossil fuels Not defined

III.D.Methane recovery in animal manure management

systemsModel correction factor to account for model uncertainties 0.94

Ref: FCCC/SBSTA/2003/10/Add.2, page

25.

Default average animal weight of a defined population IPCC 2006 kg

f h i h d i i l f h2006 IPCC


5/220


III.F. Landfill methane recoveryEmission factor for composting of organic waste and/or

manure

10 g CH4/kg waste

treated on a dry

weight basis

4 g CH4/kg waste

treated on a wet

weight basis

0

t CH4/ton waste

treatedIPCC

Methane producing capacity of the wastewater 0.25 kg CH4/kg COD IPCC

Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties 1.12

III.H. Methane recovery in wastewater treatment

Methane producing capacity of the wastewater (IPCC value of

0.25 kg CH4/kg COD). Project activities may use the default

value of 0.6 kg CH4/kg BOD, if the parameter BOD5,20 is

used to determine the organic content of the wastewater. In

this case, baseline and project emissions calculations shall

use BOD instead of COD in the equations, and the monitoring

of the project activity shall be based in direct measurements ofBOD5,20, i.e. the estimation of BOD values based on COD

measurements is not allowed

0.25 kg CH4/kg COD IPCC

Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties 0.89Ref. FCCC/SBSTA/2003/10/Add.2, page

25.

Degradable organic content of the untreated sludge

generated in the yeary (fraction, dry basis).

0.5 (for domestic

sludge)

0.257 (for industrial

sludge)

The IPCC default values of 0.05 for

domestic sludge (wet basis, considering a

default dry matter content of 10%) or 0.09

for industrial sludge (wet basis, assuming

dry matter content of 35%), were correctedfor dry basis.

Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties 0.89

Fraction of DOC dissimilated to biogas 0.5 IPCC

Fraction of CH4 in biogas 0.5 IPCC

III.G.Avoidance of methane emissions through controlled

biological treatment of biomassFlare efficiency in the year y 90%/50% fraction

If in any specific hour any of the parameters

is out of the range of specifications, 50% of

default value should be used for this specific

hourIII.P.

Recovery and utilization of waste gas in refinery

facilitiesNot defined

III.Q. Waste energy recovery (gas/heat/pressure) projects Not defined


6/220


ACM0001 version11

Consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology for landfill gas project activities

Baseline Emissions

Equation(1)

Abbre Description UnitDefault

Value

Source

of dataTool/Other m Remarks

BEy Baseline Emissions in year y t CO2MD project,y

The amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during the year, in tonnes of methane in project

scenariotCH4

MDBL,yThe amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during the year in the absence of the project due

to regulatory and/or contractual requirement, in tonnes of methanetCH4

GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential value for methane for the first commitment period tCO2e/tCH4 21

ELLFG,yNet quantity of electricity produced using LFG, which in the absence of the project activity would have been produced

by power plants connected to the grid or by an on-site/off-site fossil fuel based captive power generation, during year

, in me awatt hours

MWh

CEFelecy,B Carbon emission factor of electricity tCO2e/MWh 0.8

ETLFG,yThe quantity of thermal energy produced utilizing the landfill gas, which in the absence of the project activity would

have been produced from onsite/offsite fossil fuel fired boiler/air heater, during the year y TJ

CEFther,BL,yCO2 emissions intensity of the fuel used by boiler/air heater to generate thermal energy which is displaced by LFG

based thermal ener enerationtCO2e/TJ

Equation(2) -

Equation(3) -


Value

Source


BL Destruction efficiency of the baseline system fraction

MDHist Amount of methane destroyed historically measured for the previous year before the start of project activity tCH4

MGHistAmount of methane generated historically for the previous year before the start of project activity, estimated using the

actual amount of waste disposed in the landfilltCH4 Tool 4

Option 1

Equation(4) -


Value

Source


PR Destruction efficiency of the system used in the project activity that will remain fixed for the whole crediting period fraction

MD project,1moun o me ane es roye y e proec ac v y ur ng e rs year o e proec

tCH4

MGPR,1 Amount of methane generated during the first year of the project activity estimated using the actual amount of wastedisposed in the landfill

tCH4 Tool 4

Option 2


7/220


Equation(5) -

PR,y Description UnitDefault

Value

Source


EGBL,add, y Destruction efficiency of the system used in the project activity for year y fraction

MD project,y Amount of methane destroyed by the project activity during the year y of the project activity tCH4

MGPR,yAmount of methane generated during year y of the project activity estimated using the actual amount of waste

dis osed in the landfilltCH4 Tool 4

Option 1

Equation(6) -

Option 2

Equation(7) -


Value

Source


AFy Adjustment factor for year y, this factor will be used in equation 2 in place of AF

Equation(8) - Remarks


Value

Source

of dataTool/Other methodology

MD flared,y Quantity of methane destroyed by flaring tCH4

MD electricityQuantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity tCH4

MD thermal,yQuantity of methane destroyed for the generation of thermal energy tCH4

MD pl,y Quantity of methane sent to the pipeline for feeding to the natural gas distribution network tCH4

Equation(9)


Value

Source


LFGflare,y Quantity of landfill gas fed to the flare(s) during the year measured in cubic meters m3

wCH4,y Average methane fraction of the landfill gas as measured4 during the year m CH4/m LFG

DCH4 Methane density expressed in tonnes of methane per cubic meter of methane tCH4/m3CH4 0.0007168At standard temperature and

pressure (0 degree Celsius and

1,013 bar)

PEflare,y Project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream in year y tCO2e Tool 6

Equation(10)


8/220



Value

Source


MD electricityQuantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity tCH4

LFGelectricit Quantity of landfill gas fed into electricity generator m3

Equation(11)

Abbre Description Unit

Default

Value

Source

of data Tool/Other m Remarks

MDthermal,y Quantity of methane destroyed for the generation of thermal energy tCH4

LFGthermal, Quantity of landfill gas fed into the boiler/air heater/heat generating equipment. m3

Equation(12) -


Value

Source


LFGPL,y Quantity of landfill gas sent to pipeline for feeding to the natural gas distribution network m3

Equation(13)


Value

Source


BECH4,SWD Methane generation from the landfill in the absence of the project activity at year y tCO2e Tool 4

Equation(14)


Value

Source


EFfuel,BL Emission factor of baseline fossil fuel used, as identified in the baseline scenario identification procedure tCO2/mass of volume unit

NCVfuel,BL Net calorific value of fuel, as identified through the baseline identification procedure, GJ per unit of volume or mass

gen,BL Efficiency of baseline power generation plant 60%Use the highest value among the

four values including default

value

Equivalent of GJ energy in a MWh of electricity 3.6

Equation(15)


Value

Source


boiler/air hea The energy efficiency of the boi ler/air heater used in the absence of the project activi ty to generate the thermal energy 100%Default valueis for air heater

efficiency

NCVfuel,BLNet calorific value of fuel, as identified through the baseline identification procedure, used in the boiler/air heater to

enerate the thermal ener in the absence of the ro ect activit in TJ er unit of volume or massEFfuel,BL

Emission factor of the fuel, as identified through the baseline identification procedure, used in the boiler/air heater to

generate the thermal energy in the absence of the project activitytCO2 / unit of volume or mass of the fuel

Project Emissions


9/220


Equation(16)


Value

Source


PEEC,y Emissions from consumption of electricity in the project case Tool 5

PEFC,j,y Emissions from consumption of heat in the project case Tool 3

Emission reductions

Equation(17)


Value

Source


ERy Emission reductions in year y t CO2e/yr

BEy Baseline emissions in year y t CO2e/yr

PEy Project emissions in year y t CO2e/yr

Monitoring

Abbre Description UnitDefaultValue

Sourceof data

Tool/Other m Remarks

Regulatory requirements relating to landfill gas Tool 3

T Temperature of the landfill gas C Tool 3

P Pressure of the landfill gas Pa Tool 3

Operatio

n of the

energy

plant

Operation of the energy plant Hours

Operation of the

boiler/air

heater/he

at

generatin

g

equipmen

t

Operation of the boiler/air heater/heat generating equipment Hours


10/220


Parameter No.

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

1-6

1-7

1-8

Parameter No.

2-1

2-2

2-3

Parameter No.

4-1

4-2

4-3


11/220


Parameter No.

5-1

5-2

5-3

Parameter No.

7-1

Parameter No.

8-1

8-2

8-3

8-4

Parameter No.

9-1

9-2

9-3

9-4


12/220


Parameter No.

10-1

10-2

Parameter No.

11-1

11-2

Parameter No.

12-1

Parameter No.

13-1

Parameter No.

14-1

14-2

14-3

14-4

Parameter No.

15-1

15-2

15-3


13/220


Parameter No.

16-1

16-2

Parameter No.

17-1

17-2

17-3

Parameter No.M-1

M-2

M-3

M-4

M-5


14/220


ACM0002 version12.1Consolidated methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources

Baseline Emissions

Equation(1)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEy Baseline emissions in year y tCO2/yr

EGPJ,yQuantity of net electricity generation that is produced and fed into the grid as a result of the implementation of the

CDM project activity in year yMWh/yr

EFgrid,CM,y Combined margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y tCO2/MWh Tool 7

(a) Greenfield renewable ener ower lants

Equation(2) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks



EGfacility,y Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant/unit to the grid in year y MWh/yr

(b) Retrofit or replacement of an existing renewable energy power plant

(c) Capacity addition to an existing renewable energy power plant, Option1

Equation(3) -

Equation(4) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks


CDM project activity in year yMWh/yr 0 on/after DATEBaselineRetrofit

EGfacility,y Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant/unit to the grid in year y MWh/yr

EGhistorical Annual average historical net electricity generation delivered to the grid by the existing renewable energy plant thatwas operated at the project site prior to the implementation of the project activity

MWh/yr

historicalStandard deviation of the annual average historical net electricity generation delivered to the grid by the existing

renewable energy plant that was operated at the project site prior to the implementation of the project activityMWh/yr

DATEBaseli Point in time when the existing equipment would need to be replaced in the absence of the project activity date

Option 2

Equation(5) -


15/220



Value

Source

of data

methodolog Remarks



EGPJ_Add,yQuantity of net electricity generation supplied to the grid in year y by the project plant/unit that has been added under

the ro ect activitMWh/yr

Project Emissions

Equation(6)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEy Project emissions in year y tCO2e/yr 0

not in the case using fossile fuel

and emitting from geothermal

power plant and hydro power

plant.

PEFF,y Project emissions from fossil fuel consumption in year y tCO2/yr Tool 3

PEGP,yroec emss ons rom e opera on o geo erma power p an s ue o e reease o non-con ensa e gases n year

tCO2e/yr

PEHP,y Project emissions from water reservoirs of hydro power plants in year y tCO2e/yr

Equation(7)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEGP,y

Project emissions from the operation of geothermal power plants due to the release of non-condensable

gases in year ytCO2e/yr

wsteam,CO2,Average mass fraction of carbon dioxide in the produced steam in year y tCO2/t steam

wsteam,CH4, Average mass fraction of methane in the produced steam in year y tCH4/t steamGWPCH4 Global warming potential of methane valid for the relevant commitment period tCO2e/tCH4 21

Msteam,y Quantity of steam produced in year y t steam/yr

(a) If the power density of the project activity (PD) is greater than 4 W/m2 and less than or equal to10 W/m2:

Equation(8)

Description UnitDefault

Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEHP,y Project emissions from water reservoirs tCO2e/yr

EFRes Default emission factor for emissions from reservoirs of hydro power plants in year y kgCO2e/MWh 90

TEGyTotal electricity produced by the project activity, including the electricity supplied to the grid and the electricity supplied

to internal loads in earMWh

(b) If the power density of the project activity (PD) is greater than 10 W/m2:

Equation(9)


16/220



Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEHP,y Project emissions from water reservoirs tCO2e/yr 0If the power density of the project

activit PD is reater than 10

Equation(10)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PD Power density of the project activity W/m2

CapPJ Installed capacity of the hydro power plant after the implementation of the project activity W

CapBL Installed capacity of the hydro power plant before the implementation of the project activity W 0 For new hydro power plants

APJArea of the reservoir measured in the surface of the water, after the implementation of the project activity, when the

reservoir is fullm2

ABL Area of the reservoir measured in the surface of the water, before the implementation of the project activity, when thereservoir is full

m2 0 For new reservoirs

Emission reductions

Equation(11)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

ERy Emission reductions in year y t CO2e/yrBEy Baseline emissions in year y t CO2e/yr

PEy Project emissions in year y t CO2e/yr

Monitoring


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

DATEhist Point in time from which the time span of historical data for retrofit or replacement project activities may start date


17/220


Parameter No.

1-1

1-2

1-3

Parameter No.

2-1

2-2

Parameter No.

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5


18/220


Parameter No.

5-1

5-2

Parameter No.

6-1

6-2

6-3

6-4

Parameter No.

7-1

7-27-3

7-4

7-5

Parameter No.

8-1

8-2

8-3


19/220


Parameter No.

9-1

Parameter No.

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

Parameter No.

10-1

10-2

10-3

Parameter No.

M-2

IGES CDM M h d l Li


20/220


ACM0003 version7.4Emissions reduction through partial substitution of fossil fuels with alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fuels in cement manuf

Baseline Emissions

Equation(1)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEy Baseline emissions in year y tCO2

BEFF,y Baseline emission from fossil fuels displaced by alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fossil fuels in year y tCO2

BECH4,biomBaseline methane emissions avoided during the year y from preventing disposal or cncontrolled burning of biomass

residuestCO2e

Equation(2) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

FPy Fuel penalty in year y GJ

Pclinker,y Production of clinker in year y tons

SECclinker, Specific energy consumption of the project plant in year y GJ/t clinker

SECclinker, Specific energy consumption of the project plant in the absence of the project activity GJ/t clinker

Equation(3)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

SECclinker, Specific energy consumption of the project plant in year y GJ/t clinker

FCPJ,i,y Quantity of fossil fuel type i fired in the project plant in year y tons

NCVi,y Net calorific value of the fossil fuel type i in year y GJ/tonregional/

national/I

PCC

In the case that values provided

by the fuel supplier in invoices or

mesured are not available

FCPJ,k,y Quanti ty of al ternative fuel or less carbon intensive fossi l fuel type k used in the project plant in year y tons

NCVk,y Net calorific value of the alternative or less carbon intensive fuel type k in year y GJ/tonregional/

national/I

PCC




Pclinker,y Production of clinker in year y tons

k Alternative fuel types and less carbon intensive fossil fuel types used in the project plant in year y

i Fossil fuel types used in the project plant in year y that are not less carbon intensive fossil fuel types

Equation(4) -

IGES CDM M h d l Li


21/220


Equation(5) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

SECclinker,B Specific energy consumption of the project plant in the absence of the project activity GJ/t clinker

HGx Heat generated from fuel combustion in the project plant in the historical year x GJ

FCi,x Quantity of fossil fuel type i used in the project plant in year x tons

NCVi Net calorific value of the fossil fuel type i GJ/tonregional/

national/I

PCC




Pclinker,x Production of clinker in year x tons

x Year prior to the start of the project activity

i Fossil fuel types used in the project plant in the last three years prior to the start of the project activity

Equation(6)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEFF,y Baseline emission from fossil fuels displaced by alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fossil fuels in year y tCO2


NCVk,y Net calorific value of the alternative or less carbon intensive fuel type k in year y GJ/tonregional/

national/I

PCC




FPy Fuel penalty in year y GJ

EFCO2,BL,yCarbon dioxide emissions factor for the fossil fuels displaced by the use of alternative fuels or less carbon intensive

fossil fuels in the project plant in year ytCO2/GJ


A.

Equation(7) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks



FCi,x Quantity of fossil fuel type i used in the project plant in year x tons

NCVi Net calorific value of the fossil fuel type i GJ/tonregional/

national/I

PCC




IGES CDM M th d l Li t


22/220


EFCO2,FF,i CO2 emission factor for fossil fuel type i tCO2/GJ 0regional/

national/I

PCC

or e case; as es org na ngfrom fossil sources where W1 has

been identified as the most

plausible baseline scenario; -

Biomass residues; - Renewable

biomass


x Year prior to the start of the project activity

i Fossil fuel types used in the project plant in the last three years prior to the start of the project activity

B.

Equation(8)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

EFCO2,BL, Carbon dioxide emissions factor for the fossil fuels displaced by the use of alternative fuels or less carbon intensivefossil fuels in the project plant in year y tCO2/GJ

FCPJ,i,y Quantity of fossil fuel type i fired in the project plant in year y tons


national/I

PCC




EFCO2,FF,i,y Carbon dioxide emission factor for fossi l fuel type i in year y tCO2/GJ 0regional/

national/I

PCC

0 for the case; Wastes originating

from fossil sources where W1 has

been identified as the most

plausible baseline scenario; -Biomass residues; - Renewable

biomass



mesured are not available,use

defaule of regional/national/IPCC

i Fossil fuel types used in the project plant in year y that are not less carbon intensive fossil fuel types

C.

Equation(9) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks



FCBL,F3,i,yQuantity of fossil fuel type i that would in the absence of the project activity be used in the project plant according to

the selected baseline scenario F3 in year y tons


national/I

PCC






23/220


EFCO2,i,y Carbon dioxide emission factor for fossil fuel type i in year y tCO2/GJ

iFossil fuel types that are not less carbon intensive fossil fuel types and that would in the absence of the project activity

be used in the project plant according to the selected baseline scenario F3 in year y

Equation(10)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BECH4,biom Baseline methane emissions avoided during the year y from preventing disposal or uncontrolled burning of biomassresidues

tCO2e

BECH4,B1/BBaseline methane emissions avoided during the year y from aerobic decay and/or uncontrolled burning of biomass

residuestCO2e

BECH4,B2,yBaseline methane emissions avoided during the year y from anaerobic decay of biomass residues at a solid waste

disposal sitetCO2e Tool 4

Equation(11) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Othermethodolog

y

Remarks

BECH4,B1/Base ne me ane emss ons avo e ur ng e year y rom aero c ecay an or uncon ro e urn ng o omass

tCO2e

GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential of methane valid for the commitment period tCO2e/tCH4


NCVk,y Net calorific value of the alternative or less carbon intensive fuel type k in year y GJ/tonneregional/

national/I

PCC




EFburning,C CH4 emission factor for uncontrolled burning of the biomass residue type k during the year y tCH4/GJ0.0027-

0.001971

0.0027 :in the absence of more

accurate information,

kTypes of biomass residues used as alternative fuel in the project plant in year y for which the identified baseline

scenario is B1 or B3 and for which leakage effects could be ruled out with one of the approaches L1, L2 or L3

described in the leakage section

Project Emissions

Equation(12)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEy Project emissions during the year y tCO2e

PEk,yProject emissions from combustion of alternative fuels and/or less carbon intensive fossil fuels in the project plant in

year ytCO2

PEFC,y Project emissions from additional fossil fuel combustion as a result of the project activi ty in year y tCO2

PEEC,y Project emissions from additional electricity consumption as a resul t of the project activity in year y tCO2 Tool 5PET,y CO2 emissions during the year y due to transport of alternative fuels to the project plant tCO2

PEBC,y Project emissions from the cultivation of renewable biomass at the dedicated plantation in year y tCO2e



24/220


Equation(13) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEk,yroec emssons rom com us on o a erna ve ues an or ess car on n ens ve oss ue s n e proec p an n

tCO2


EFCO2,k,y Carbon dioxide emissions factor for alternative or less carbon intensive fossil fuels type k in year y tCO2/GJ 0regional/

national/I

PCC

from fossil sources where W1 has

been identified as the mostplausible baseline scenario; -


biomass




NCVk,y Net calorific value of the alternative or less carbon intensive fossil fuel type k in year y GJ/tonneregional/

national/I

PCC





Option 1

Equation(14) -

Equation(15)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PET,y CO2 emissions during the year y due to transport of alternative fuels to the project plant tCO2/yr

Ny Number of truck trips during the year y

AVDyverage roun r p s ance rom an o e ween e a erna ve ue supp y s es an e s e o e pro ec p an

km

EFkm,CO2,y Average CO2 emission factor for the trucks measured during the year y tCO2/km IPCCIf reliable national default values

are not available

AFT,k,y Quantity of alternative fuel type k that has been transported to the project site during the year ymass or

TLy Average truck load of the trucks used (tons or liter) during the year y

k Types of alternative fuels used in the project plant and that have been transported to the project plant in year y

Option 2

Equation(16)



25/220

gy


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PET,y CO2 emissions during the year y due to transport of alternative fuels to the project plant tCO2/yr

FCTR,I,y Fuel consumption of fuel type i in trucks for transportation of alternative fuels during the year ymass or

NCVi,y Net calorific value of fossil fuel type iGJ/mass or

volume unit

regional/

national/I

PCC




EFCO2,FF,i,y CO2 emission factor for fossil fuel type i in year y tCO2/GJ 0regional/

national/I

PCC

0 for the case; Wastes originating

from fossil sources where W1 hasbeen identified as the most

plausible baseline scenario; -


biomass




defaule of re ional/national/IPCC

i Fossil fuel types used for transportation of alternative fuels to the project plant in year y

Equation(17)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEBC,y Project emissions from the cultivation of renewable biomass at the dedicated plantation in year y tCO2e

PEFC,PL,y Project emissions related to fossil fuel consumption at the plantation during agricultural operations in year y tCO2/yr Tool 3

PEFP,y Project emissions related to the production of synthetic ferti lizer that is used at the dedicated plantation in year y tCO2/yr 0 AM0042

In case of using organic fertilizers

(compost), emissions from

production of organic fertilizers

are negligible

PEFA,y Project emissions related to the application of fertilizers at the lantation in year y tCO2e/yr AM0042

PEBB,y Project emissions arising from field burning of biomass at the plantation site tCO2e/yr AM0042

PEIR,y Project emissions from irrigation of the plantation should be estimated Tool 3,Tool 5

Leakage

Equation(18) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

LEy Leakage emissions during the year y tCO2e/yr

LEBR,y Leakage emissions related to the use of biomass residues during the year y tCO2LEFF,upstrea Upstream leakage emissions from fossil fuel use in year y tCO2e



26/220

Equation(19) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

LEBR,y Leakage emissions during the year y tCO2/yr

EFCO2,LE CO2 emission factor of the most carbon intensive fuel used in the country tCO2/GJ national/IPCC

If national default values are notavailable

FCPJ,k,y Quantity of biomass residue type k used in the project plant in year y tons

NCVk,y Net calorific value of the biomass residue type k in year yGJ/ton of dry

matter

regional/

national/I

PCC




kypes o omass res ues or w c ea age e ec s cou no e ru e ou w one o e approac es , or

Equation(20) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

LEFF,upstre Upstream leakage emissions from fossil fuel use in year y tCO2e 0total net leakage effects from

upstream emissions are negative

LECH4,y Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y tCO2e

LELNG,CO2,ea age emssons ue o oss ue com us on / e ec r c y consump on assoc a e w e que ac on,

-tCO2e

Equation(21) -

Abbre Description Unit

Default

Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodology

Remarks

LECH4,y Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y tCO2e Remarks

FCPJ,k,y Quantity of less carbon intensive fossil fuel type k used in the project plant in year ymass or

FCBL,i,y Quantity of fossil fuel type i displaced in the project plant as a result of the project activity in year ymass or

NCVk,y Net calorific value of less carbon intensive fossil fuel type k in year y/mass or reg ona / n e case a va ues prov e

NCVi,y Net calorific value of fossil fuel type i in year y/mass or reg ona / n e case a va ues prov e

EFk,upstream ss on ac or or ups ream ug ve me ane em ss ons rom pro uc on, ranspor a on an s r u on o ess

t CH4 / GJ Table 3

EFi,upstreamm ss on ac or or ups ream ug ve me ane em ss ons rom pro uc on, ranspor a on an s r u on o oss ue

t CH4 / GJ Table 3GWPCH4 Global warming potential of methane valid for the relevant commitment period

k Less carbon intensive fossil fuel types used in the project plant in year y

ioss ue ypes sp ace n e pro ec p an as a resu o e use o a erna ve ues or ess car on n ensve oss



27/220

Equation(22) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

FCBL,i,y Quantity of fossil fuel type i displaced in the project plant as a result of the project activity in year ymass or

NCVi,y Net calorific value of fossil fuel type i in year yGJ/mass or

volume unit

regional/

national/I

PCC




Si,yShare of fossil fuel type i (on an energy basis) in the fossil fuel mix that is displaced in the project plant as a result of

the use of alternative fuels or less carbon intensive fossil fuels under the project activity, determined consistently with

the determination of EFCO2,BL,y

FCPJ,k,y Quantity of less carbon intensive fossil fuel type k used in the project plant in year ymass or

NCVk,y Net calorific value of less carbon intensive fossil fuel type k in year yGJ/mass or

volume unit

regional/

national/I

PCC




ioss ue ypes sp ace n e pro ec p an as a resu o e use o a erna ve ue s or ess car on n ens ve oss

k Less carbon intensive fossil fuel types used in the project plant in year y

Equation(23) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

LELNG,CO2,Leakage emissions due to fossil fuel combustion/electricity consumption associated with the liquefaction,

transportation, re-gasification and compression of LNG into a natural gas transmission or distribution system during

the year y

tCO2e

FCPJ,NG,y Quantity of natural gas used in the project plant in the year y m3

NCVNG,y Net calorific values of natural gas in the project plant in year y GJ/mregional/

national/I

PCC




EFCO2,upstrEmission factor for upstream CO2 emissions due to fossil fuel combustion/electricity consumption associated with the

liquefaction, transportation, re-gasification and compression of LNG into a natural gas transmission or distribution

system

tCO2/GJ6 t

CO2/TJ

IF reliable and accurate data on

upstream CO2 emissions due to

fossil fuel combustion/electricityconsumption associated with the

liquefaction, transportation, re-

gasification and compression of

LNG into a natural gas

transmission or distribution

system is not available,

Emission Reductions

Equation(24) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks



28/220

ERy Emission reductions during the year y tCO2/yr

BEy Baseline emissions during the year y tCO2e/yr

PEy Project emissions during the year y tCO2e/yr

LEy Leakage emissions during the year y tCO2e/yr

Monitoring


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

Demonstration that the biomass residue type k from a specific source would continue not to be collected or utilized,

Quantity of biomass residues of type k that are utilized tons

Quantity of available biomass residues of type k in the region

Availability of a surplus of biomass residue type k



29/220

cture

Parameter No.

1-1

1-2

1-3

Parameter No.

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-4

Parameter No.

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8



30/220

Parameter No.

5-1

5-2

5-3

5-4

5-5

5-6

5-7

Parameter No.

6-1

6-2

6-3

6-4

6-5

6-6

Parameter No.

7-1

7-2

7-3



31/220

7-4

7-5

7-6

Parameter No.

8-1

8-2

8-3

8-4

8-5

Parameter No.

9-1

9-2

9-3



32/220

9-4

9-5

Parameter No.

10-1

10-2

10-3

Parameter No.

11-1

11-2

11-3

11-4

11-5

11-6

Parameter No.

12-1

12-2

12-3

12-4

12-5

12-6



33/220

Parameter No.

13-1

13-2

13-3

13-4

13-5

Parameter No.

14-1

14-2

14-3

14-4

14-5

14-6

14-7



34/220

Parameter No.

16-1

16-2

16-3

16-4

16-5

Parameter No.

17-1

17-2

17-3

17-4

17-5

17-6

Parameter No.

18-1

18-2

18-3



35/220

Parameter No.

19-1

19-2

19-3

19-4

19-5

Parameter No.

20-1

20-2

20-3

20-4

Parameter No.

21-1

21-2

21-3

21-4

21-5

21-6

21-7

21-8

21-9

21-10



36/220

Parameter No.

22-1

22-2

22-3

22-4

22-5

22-6

22-7

Parameter No.

23-1

23-2

23-3

23-4

Parameter No.



37/220

24-1

24-2

24-3

24-4

Parameter No.

M-1

M-2

M-3

M-4



38/220

ACM0005 version5Consolidated Methodology for Increasing the Blend in Cement Production

Baseline Emissions

Equation(1)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEBC,y Baseline CO2 emissions per tonne of blended cement type (BC) t CO2/tonneBC

BEclinker CO2 emissions per tonne of clinker in the baseline in the project activity plantt CO2/tonne

clinker

BBlend,y Baseline benchmark of share of clinker per tonne of BC updated for year ytonne of

clinker/tonne

of BC

BEele_ADD_Baseline electricity emissions for BC grinding and preparation of additivest CO2/tonne

BC

Equation(2) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEclinker Baseline emissions of CO2 per tonne of clinker in the project activity plantonne

BEcalcin Baseline emissions per tonne of clinker due to calcinations of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonateonne

BEfossil_fuel Baseline emissions per tonne of clinker due to combustion of fossil fuels for clinker productiononne

BEele_grid_ Baseline grid electricity emissions for clinker production per tonne of clinkeronne

BEele_sg_C Baseline emissions from self generated electricity for clinker production per tonne of clinker t CO2/tonneclinker

Equation(3) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEcalcin Emissions from the calcinations of limestoneonne

0.785 Stoichiometric emission factor for CaO tCO2/t CaO 0.7851.092 Stoichiometric emission factor for MgO tCO2/t MgO 1.092

InCaO CaO content (%) of the raw material * raw material quantity tonnes

OutCaO CaO content (%) of the clinker * clinker produced tonnes

InMgO MgO content (%) of the raw material * raw material quantity tonnes

OutMgO MgO content (%) of the clinker * clinker produced tonnes

CLNKBSL Annual production of clinker in the base yearo onnes o

Equation(4) -



39/220


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

BEfossil_fuel Baseline emissions per tonne of clinker due to combustion of fossil fuels for clinker production/ onne

FFi_BSL Fossil fuel of type i consumed for clinker production in the baselineonnes o ue

EFFi Emission factor for fossil fuel it CO2/tonne

of fuelIPCC

If actual mesured or local data is

not available


Equation(5)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEele_grid_ Baseline grid electricity emissions for clinker production per tonne of clinker/ onne

BELEgrid_C Baseline grid electricity for clinker production MWh

EFgrid_BSL Baseline grid emission factor t CO2/MWh Tool 7


Equation(6)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEelec_sg_CBaseline emissions from self generated electricity for clinker production per tonne of clinkert CO2/tonne

clinker

BELEsg_CL Baseline self generation of electricity for clinker production MWh

EFsg_BSL Baseline electricity self generation emission factor t CO2/MWh

CLNKBSL Annual production of clinker in the base yearkilotonnes of

clinker

Equation(7) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEele_ADD_ Baseline electricity emissions for BC grinding and preparation of additivesonne

BEele_grid_ Baseline grid electricity emissions for BC grinding/ onne

BEele_sg_B Baseline self generated electricity emissions for BC grinding/ onne

BEele_grid_ Baseline grid electricity emissions for additive preparation/ onne

BEele_sg_A Baseline self generated electricity emissions for additive preparationonne

Equation(8) -



40/220


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

BEele_grid_B Baseline grid electricity emissions for BC grinding/ onne

BELEgrid_B Baseline grid electricity for grinding BC MWh


BCBSL Annual production of BC in the base yearo onnes o

Equation(9) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEelec_sg_B Baseline self generated electricity emissions for BC grinding/ onne

BELEsg_BC Baseline self generation electricity for grinding BC MWh



Equation(10)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

BEele_grid_ Baseline grid electricity emissions for additive preparation/ onne

BELEgrid_A Baseline grid electricity for grinding additives MWh



Equation(11)


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

BEelec_sg_A Baseline self generated electricity emissions for additive preparationtCO2/tonne

of BC

BELEsg_AD Baseline self generation electricity for grinding additives MWh


BCBSL Annual production of BC in the base yearkilotonnes of

BC

Project Emissions

Equation(12)



41/220


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

PEBC,y CO2 emissions per tonne of BC in the project activity plant in year y/ onnes

PEclinker,y CO2 emissions per tonne of clinker in the project activity plant in year yonne

PBlend,y Share of clinker per tonne of BC in year ytonne of

clinker/tonne

of BC

PEele_AD,D Electricity emissions for BC grinding and preparation of additives in year y/ onne

Equation(13)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEclinker,y Emissions of CO2 per tonne of clinker in the project activity plant in year yt CO2/tonne

clinker

PEcalcin,y Emissions per tonne of clinker due to calcinations of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate in year yt CO2/tonne

clinker

PEfossil_fuel Emissions per tonne of clinker due to combustion of fossil fuels for clinker production in year y t CO2/tonneclinker

PEele_grid_ Grid electricity emissions for clinker production per tonne of clinker in year yt CO2/tonne

clinker

PEele_sg_C Emissions from self-generated electricity per tonne of clinker production in year yt CO2/tonne

clinker

Equation(14) -

Abbre Description Unit DefaultValue

Sourceof data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEcalcin,y Emissions from the calcinations of limestone/ onne

0.785 Stoichiometric emission factor for CaO tCO2/t CaO

1.092 Stoichiometric emission factor for MgO tCO2/t MgO

InCaO,y CaO content (%) of the raw material * raw material quantity tonnes

OutCaO,y CaO content (%) of the clinker * clinker produced tonnes

InMgO,y MgO content (%) of the raw material * raw material quantity tonnes

OutMgO,y MgO content (%) of the clinker * clinker produced tonnes

Equation(15) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEfossil_fuel, Emissions per tonne of clinker due to combustion of fossil fuels for clinker production in year y onne

FFi_,y Fossil fuel of type i consumed for clinker production in year yonnes o ue

EFFi Emission factor for fossil fuel itCO2/tonne

of fuelIPCC

If actual mesured or local data is

not available



42/220

CLNKy Annual production of clinker in year y o onnes o

Equation(16) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEele_grid_ Grid electricity emissions for clinker production per tonne of clinker in year yonne

PELEgrid_Grid electricity for clinker production in year y MWh

EFgrid_y Grid emission factor in year y t CO2/MWh Tool 7

CLNKy Annual production of clinker in year y t CO2/MWh

Equation(17)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEelec_sg_CEmissions from self-generated electricity per tonne of clinker production in year y / onne

PELEsg_CL Self generation of electricity for clinker production in year y MWh

EFsg_y Emission factor for self generated electricity in year y t CO2/MWh

CLNKy Annual production of clinker in year yo onnes o

Equation(18)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEele_ADD_Electricity emissions for BC grinding and preparation of additives in year ytCO2/tonne

of BC

PEele_grid_ Grid electricity emissions for BC grinding in year ytCO2/tonne

of BC

PEele_sg_B Emissions from self generated electricity for BC grinding in year ytCO2/tonne

of BC

PEele_grid_ Grid electricity emissions for additive preparation in year y tCO2/tonneof BC

PEele_sg_A Emissions from self generated electricity additive preparation in year ytCO2/tonne

of BC

Equation(19) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEele_grid_B Grid electricity emissions for BC grinding in year y/ onne

PELEgrid_B Baseline grid electricity for grinding BC MWh

EFgrid_y Grid emission factor in year y t CO2/MWh Tool 7

BCy Annual production of BC in year ykilotonnes of

BC



43/220

Equation(20) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEelec_sg_B Emissions from self generated electricity for BC grinding in year y/ onne

PELEsg_BC Self generated electricity for grinding BC in year y MWh


BCy Annual production of BC in year yo onnes o

Equation(21) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEele_grid_ Grid electricity emissions for additive preparation in year yonne

PELEgrid_A Baseline grid electricity for grinding additives MWhEFgrid_y Grid emission factor in year y t CO2/MWh Tool 7


Equation(22)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

PEelec_sg_A Emissions from self generated electricity additive preparation in year y / onne

PELEsg_AD Baseline self generation electricity for grinding additives MWh



Equation(23)


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

EFsg,y Emission factor for self generated electricity in year y t CO2/MWh

Fi ,j, y Amount of fuel i (in a mass or volume unit) consumed by relevant power sources j in year(s) y

j On-site power sources

COEFi,j yCO2 emission coefficient of fuel i (tCO2 / mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of

the fuels used by relevant power sources j and the percent oxidation of the fuel in year(s) y

tCO2 / massor volume

unit of the

fuel

GENj,y Electricity (MWh) generated by the source j



44/220

Equation(24) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

COEFiCO2 emission coefficient of fuel i (tCO2 / mass or volume unit of the fuel), taking into account the carbon content of

the fuels used by relevant power sources j and the percent oxidation of the fuel in year(s) y

mass

or volume

NCVi Net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel iregional/

national/I

PCC




OXIDi Oxidation factor of the fuel IPCC

EFCO2,i CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i IPCCIf actual mesured or local data is

not available

Leakage

Equation(25) -


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

Ladd_trans Transport related emissions per tonne of additivesonne

TFcons Fuel consumption for the vehicle per kilometreg o

Dadd_source Distance between the source of additive and the project activity plant km

TEF Emission factor for transport fuelg g o

ELEconveyo Annual Electricity consumption for conveyor system for additives MWh

EFgrid y Grid emission factor in year y t CO2/MWh Tool 7

Qadd Quantity of additive carried in one trip per vehicleonnes o

ADDy Annual consumption of additives in year yonnes o

Equation(26) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

Ly Leakage emissions for transport of additives o onnes o

Ladd_trans Transport related emissions per tonne of additivesonne

BCy Production of BC in year yo onnes o

Ablend,y Baseline benchmark share of additives per tonne of BC updated for year yonne o

Pblend,y Share of additives per tonne of BC in year yonne o

Equation(27) y = x tonnes of additives in year y / total additional additives used in year y -


Value

Source

of data


y

Remarks

y Reduction factor



45/220

Emission Reductions

Equation(28) -


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks

ERy Emissions reductions in year y due to project activityousan

BEBC,y Baseline emissions per tonne of BConnes

PEBC,y Project emissions per tonne of BC in year y onnes

BCy BC production in year yousan

y Reduction factor

Monitoring


Value

Source

of data

Tool/Other

methodolog

y

Remarks



46/220

Parameter No.

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

Parameter No.

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-4

2-5

Parameter No.

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

3-8



47/220

Parameter No.

4-1

4-2

4-3

4-4

Parameter No.

5-1

5-2

5-3

5-4

Parameter No.

6-1

6-26-3

6-4

Parameter No.

7-1

7-2

7-3

7-4

7-5



48/220

Parameter No.

8-1

8-2

8-3

8-4

Parameter No.

9-1

9-2

9-3

9-4

Parameter No.

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

Parameter No.

11-1

11-2

11-3

11-4



49/220

Parameter No.

12-1

12-2

12-3

12-4

Parameter No.

13-1

13-2

13-3

13-4

13-5

Parameter No.

14-1

14-2

14-3

14-4

14-5

14-6

14-7

Parameter No.

15-1

15-2

15-3



50/220

15-4

Parameter No.

16-1

16-2

16-3

16-4

Parameter No.

17-1

17-2

17-3

17-4

Parameter No.

18-1

18-2

18-3

18-4

18-5

Parameter No.

19-1

19-2

19-3

19-4



51/220

Parameter No.

20-1

20-2

20-3

20-4

Parameter No.

21-1

21-2

21-3

21-4

Parameter No.

22-1

22-2

22-3

22-4

Parameter No.

23-1

23-2

23-3

23-4

23-5



52/220

Parameter No.

24-1

24-2

24-3

24-4

Parameter No.

25-1

25-2

25-3

25-4

25-5

25-6

25-7

25-8

Parameter No.

26-1

26-226-3

26-4

26-5

Parameter No.

27-1



53/220

Parameter No.

28-1

28-2

28-3

28-4

28-5

Parameter No.



54/220

ACM0006 version11.1Consolidated methodology for electricity and heat generation from biomass residuesEmission Reduction

Equation(1)

Abbre Description Unit Default ValueSource of

data

Tool/Other

methodologyRemarks Parameter No.

ERy Emissions reductions in yeary tCO2 1-1

BEy Baseline emissions in yeary tCO2 1-2PEy Project emissions in yeary tCO2 1-3

LEy Leakage emissions in yeary tCO2 1-4

Baseline Emission

Equation(2)


data

Tool/Other


BEy Baseline emissions in yeary tCO2 2-1

ELBL,GR,y Baseline minimum electricity generation in the grid in yeary MWh 2-2

EFEG,GR,y Grid emission factor in yeary tCO2/MWh 2-3

FFBL,HG,y,f Baseline fossil fuel demand for process heat in year y GJ 2-4

EFFF,y,f CO2 emission factor for fossil fuel type f in yeary tCO2/GJ 2-5

ELBL,FF/GR,y Baseline uncertain electricity generation in the grid or on-site in year y MWh 2-6

EFEG,FF,y CO2 emission factor for electricity generation with fossil fuels at the project site in the baseline in year y tCO2/MWh2-7

BEBR,y Baseline emissions due to disposal of biomass residues in yeary tCO2e 2-8

y Year of the crediting period 2-9

f Fossil fuel type 2-10

Step 1.2: Determine total baseline electricity generation

Equation(3)


data

Tool/Other


ELBL,y Baseline electricity generation in yeary MWh 3-1ELPJ,gross,y Gross quantity of electricity generated in all power plants which are located at the project site and included in

the project boundary in yeary

MWh3-2

ELPJ,imp,y Project electricity imports from the grid in yeary MWh 3-3

ELPJ,aux,y Total auxiliary electricity consumption required for the operat ion of the power plants at the project site in yeary MWh 3-4

y Year of the crediting period 3-5

Step 1.3: Determine baseline capacity of electricity generation

Equation(4)

yyyy LEPEBEER

yBR,yFF,EG,yGR,EG,y,GR/FF,BL

f

fy,FF,fy,HG,BL,yGR,EG,yGR,BL,y BE)EF,EFmin(ELEFFFEFELBE

yaux,PJ,y,imp,PJygross,PJ,yBL, ELELLEEL

j

j,PO,EGj,PO,EG

i

i,CG,EGi,CG,EGyy,total,EG LFCCAPLFCCAPLOCCAP



55/220

Abbre Description Unit Default Value Source ofdata

Tool/Othermethodology

Remarks Parameter No.

CAPEG,total,y Baseline electricity generation capacity in yeary MWh 4-1

CAPEG,CG,i Baseline electricity generation capacity of heat engine i MW 4-2

CAPEG,PO,j Baseline electricity generation capacity of heat enginej MW 4-3

LFCEG,CG,i Baseline load factor of heat engine i ratio 4-4

LFCEG,PO,j Baseline load factor of heat engine j ratio 4-5

LOCy Length of the operational campaign in year y hour 4-6

i Cogeneration-type heat engine in the baseline scenario 4-7

j Power-only-type heat engine in the baseline scenario 4-8y Year of the crediting period 4-9

Step 1.4: Determine the baseline availability of biomass residuesIn the case of projects that use biomass residues from a on-site production process

Equation(5)


data

Tool/Other


BRB4,n,y Quantity of biomass residues of category n used in the project activity in year y for which the baseline scenario

is B4:

tonne on dry-

basis5-1

BRHIST,n,x Quantity of biomass residues of category n used for power or heat generation at the project site in year x prior

the date of submission of the PDD for validation of the project activity prior the date of submission of the PDD

for validation of the project activity

tonnes on

dry-basis 5-2

Py Quantity of the main product of the production process (e.g. sugar cane, rice) produced in yeary from plants

operated at the project site5-3

Px Quantity of the main product of the production process (e.g. sugar cane, rice) produced in yearx from plants

operated at the project site5-4

y Year of the crediting period 5-5x Last calendar year prior to the start of the crediting period for which data is already available at the date of

submission of the PDD for validation5-6

n Biomass residue category 5-7

Step 1.5: Determine the efficiencies of heat generators, and efficiencies and heat-to-power ratio of heat enginesOption 1: Default values

-Use Option F in the latest approved version of the Tool to determine the baseline efficiency of thermal or

electric energy generation systemsTool 9

The default value for the losses linked to the electricity generator group (i.e. turbine/engine, couplings and

electricity generator)

Option 2: Manufacturers data.

-

only applicable to heat engines and heat generators that were operated at the project site prior to the

implementation of the project activity (and not new equipment that would be constructed and operated at the

project site in the baseline scenario).

Option 3: The efficiencies of heat generators and heat engines

-

only applicable to heat generators and heat engines that were operated at the project site for at least three

calendar years prior the date of submission of the PDD for validation of the project activity.

Efficiency for heat generators

Equation(6)

n

2-xn,BR,2-xh,n,

2-xh,BR,

n

1-xn,BR,1-xh,n,

1-xh,BR,

n

xn,BR,xh,n,

xh,BR,

hBR,HG,BL,NCVBR

HG;

NCVBR

HG;

NCVBR

HGMAX

2x

2x,n,HIST

1x

1x,n,HIST

x

x,n,HIST

yyn,,4BP

BR;

P

BR;

P

BRMAXPBR

defaultGGL



56/220

Equation(7)


data

Tool/Other


BL,HG,BR,h Baseline biomass-based heat generation efficiency of heat generator h ratio 7-1

BL,HG,FF,h Baseline fossil-based heat generation efficiency of heat generator h ratio 7-2

HGBR,h,x Net quantity of heat generated from using biomass residues in heat generator h in yearx GJ/yr 7-3HGFF,h,x Net quantity of heat generated from using fossil fuels in heat generator h in yearx GJ/yr 7-4

BRn,h,x Quantity of biomass residues of category n used in heat generator h in yearx tonnes on

dry-basis7-5

FFf,h,x Quantity of fossil fuel type f fired in heat generator h in yearx mass or

volume

unit/yr

7-6

NCVBR,n,x Net calorific value of biomass residues of category n in yearx GJ/tonnes on

dry-basis 7-7

NCVFF,f,x Net calorific value of fossil fuel type f in yearx GJ/mass or

volume unit7-8

x Last calendar year prior to the start of the crediting period 7-9

n Biomass residue category 7-10

f Fossil fuel type 7-11

h Heat generator in the baseline scenario 7-12

If fossil fuels and biomass residues were used for heat generation in the heat generator h prior to the implementation of the project activity

Equation(8)

Equation(9)


data

Tool/Other

methodology

Remarks Parameter No.

HGBR,h,x Net quantity of heat generated from using biomass residues in heat generator h in yearx GJ/yr 9-1

HGFF,h,x Net quantity of heat generated from using fossil fuels in heat generator h in yearx GJ/yr 9-2

HGh,x Net quantity of heat generated in heat generator h in year x GJ/yr 9-3

BRn,h,x Quantity of biomass residues of category n used in heat generator h in yearx tonnes on

dry-basis9-4

FFf,h,x Quantity of fossil fuel typef fired in heat generator h in yearx mass or

volume

unit/yr

9-5

NCVBR,n,x Net calorific value of biomass residues of category n in yearx GJ/tonnes ondry-basis 9-6

NCVFF,f,x Net calorific value of fossil fuel type f in yearx GJ/mass or

volume unit9-7

Efficiency for heat engines

n

2-xn,BR,2-xh,n,

2-xh,BR,

n

1-xn,BR,1-xh,n,

1-xh,BR,

n

xn,BR,xh,n,

xh,BR,

hBR,HG,BL,NCVBR

HG;

NCVBR

HG;

NCVBR

HGMAX

f

xf,FF,xh,f,

n

xn,BR,xh,n,

n xn,BR,xh,n,

xh,xh,BR,NCVFFNCVBR

NCVBR

HGHG

f

xf,FF,xh,f,

n

xn,BR,xh,n,

n

xf,FF,xh,f,

xh,xh,FF,NCVFFNCVBR

NCVFF

HGHG



57/220

Equation(10)


data

Tool/Other


BL,EG,CG,i Baseline electricity generation efficiency of heat engine i MWh/GJ 10-1

BL,EG,PO,j Average electric power generation efficiency of heat engine j MWh/GJ 10-2

ELBR,CG/PO,x,i/j Quantity of electricity generated in heat engine i/j in yearx MWh 10-3

HGBR,CG/PO,x,i/

j

Quantity of heat used in heat engine i/j in yearx GJ10-4



j Power-only-type heat engine in the baseline scenario 10-7

Case 1: For existing heat engines with a minimum three-year operational history prior to the project activity:

Equation(11)


data

Tool/Other


HPRBL,i Baseline heat-to-power ratio of the heat engine i ratio 11-1

HCBR,CG/PO,x,i/

j

Quantity of process heat extracted from the heat engine i/j in yearx (GJ) GJ11-2

ELBR,CG/PO,x,i/j Quantity of electricity generated in heat engine i/j in yearx (MWh) MWh11-3



j Power-only-type heat engine in the baseline scenario 11-6

Case 2: For heat engines without a minimum three-year operational history prior to the project activity the heat-to-power ratio should be determined as per the design conditions of the plant, for the configuration identified as baseline scenario in th

Step 1.6: Determination of the emission factor of on-site electricity generation with fossil fuelsEFEG,FF,y = EFEG,GR,y

-

If no fossil fuel based power generation was identified as part of the baseline scenario, or if fossil fuel based

power generation was identified as part of the baseline scenario, but all capacity of power generation based on

fossil fuels is used in the cogeneration mode

Option A: Determine EFEG,FF,y as per the procedure described under Scenario B: Electricity consumption from an off-grid captive power plant

-

Determine EFEG,FF,y as per the procedure described under Scenario B: Electricity consumption from an off-grid

captive power plant in the latest approved version of the Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage

emissions from electricity consumption, using data from the three calendar years prior the date of submission

of the PDD for validation of the project activity.

Option B: Determine a default emission factor for EFEG,FF

-

Determine a default emission factor for EFEG,FF based on a default efficiency of the power plant that would be

operated at the project site in the baseline and a default CO2 emission factor for the fossil fuel types that would

be used

i/j,2,,

i/j2,-xPO,BR,

i/j,1,,

i/j1,-xPO,BR,

i/j,,,

i/jx,PO,BR,

i/jPO,EG,BL,

EL;

EL;

ELMAX

xPOBRxPOBRxPOBR HGHGHG

i/j2,-xCG/PO,BR,

i/j,2x,PO/CG,BR

i/j1,-xCG/PO,BR,

i/j,1x,PO/CG,BR

i/jx,CG/PO,BR,

i/j,x,PO/CG,BR

i/jCG/PO,EG,BL,EL

HC;

EL

HC;

EL

HCMAX

6.3

1HPR



58/220

Equation(12)


data

Tool/Other


EFEG,FF,y CO2 emission factor for electricity generation with fossil fuels at the project site in the baseline in year y

(tCO2/MWh)12-1

EFBL,CO2,FF CO2 emission factor of the fossil fuel type that would be used for power generation at the project site in the

baseline (tCO2

/GJ)12-2

BL,FF Efficiency of the fossil fuel power plant(s) at the project site in the baseline (ratio) 12-3

Step 1.7: Determination of the emission factor of grid electricity generation


data

Tool/Other


-

The parameter EFEG,GR,y shoul

Date post:	05-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	olive103
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

Iges Meth Parameter 110830

Documents