+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ILC Detector R&D

ILC Detector R&D

Date post: 15-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: callum-holman
View: 85 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
ILC Detector R&D. William Morse Physics Dept., BNL. ILC SiD Detector Concept. BNL has joined SiD last fall, which is one of four ILC detector concepts. First draft of the SiD Detector Outline Document submitted to LC World Wide Study last month (150p). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
28
William Morse ILC R&D Apr il 19, 2006 1 ILC Detector R&D William Morse Physics Dept., BNL
Transcript
Page 1: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

1

ILC Detector R&D

William MorsePhysics Dept., BNL

Page 2: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

2

ILC SiD Detector Concept

• BNL has joined SiD last fall, which is one of four ILC detector concepts.

• First draft of the SiD Detector Outline Document submitted to LC World Wide Study last month (150p).

• Forward Detector Section written by BNL (W.M. coordinator).

• Web site: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/

Page 3: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

3

Forward Region Physics

• Measurement of beam-strahlung pairs for ILC bunch characterization (BeamCal).

• Measurement of forward Bhabha pairs for precision measurement of luminosity normalization (LumCal) to 210-4.

• Maintain detector hermeticity (missing PT) down to very small polar angles (5mrad).

Page 4: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

4

Forward Detector Challenges

• Radiation Hardness (10MGy/year)• Interfacing with the final focus elements• High occupancy rates (104 pairs/BX)• Good efficiency, energy and position

resolution in the presence of very high backgrounds

• Fast readout to guide beams together

Page 5: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

5

SiD Forward Detector Coordinators

• Detector Hermeticity with BeamCal/LumCal – Morse• Monitoring the Instantaneous Luminosity with BeamCal

and GamCal – Morse• LumCal Physics Requirements – Morse• Occupancy Issues in the Forward Direction – Morse• Radiation Damage Issues in the Forward Direction – Li• Space, Support, and Integration Issues – Lissauer• Readout Issues – Lanni• R&D Plan – Lissauer• Physics: Lanni, Lissauer, Morse; Instrumentation: De

Geronimo, Li, Mead, Radeka, Rescia; S.C. Magnet Div: Bret Parker; U. Oregon: Dave Strom

Page 6: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

6

What is Beam-strahlung?• Flat beam with length L, half-width B, half-height

A, L >> B >> A, = Ne/4ABL• Ev = y/0 Bh = y/c0 • Fv = e(1- 2) y/0 (space charge force)• Two bunches overlap:• E = 0 Bh = 2y/c0 – up to 1 KT for ILC• Fv = 2ey/0

• Power radiated in gammas ( F)2 0.5 MW at ILC

Page 7: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

7

Beam-strahlung and Pairs

• Bethe-Heitler pair created when meets incoming e and converts to pair

• B.H. cross-section about 610-26 cm2

• Pairs N Ne /AB• Energy in pairs over energy in gammas is

proportional to Ne /AB, ie. almost luminosity!

• Submitted as a LC Tech Note

Page 8: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

8

Collaborating with W. Lohman and M. Ohlerich (DESY)Pairs (TeV) and Gammas (MTeV)

0

40

80

120

160

200

-200 -100 0 100 200

offset (nm)

Pair

E (T

eV)

70

75

80

85

90

95

pairsgammas

Page 9: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

9

BeamCal and LumCal

• Silicon Tungsten Calorimeters

BeamCal LumCal

Polar angle 3 - 20 mrad 20 – 140 mrad

L 3.2m 1.7m

<E>/BX 20 TeV 10 GeV

Page 10: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

10

BeamCal – 14mrad crossing angle

Page 11: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

11

Maximum missing PT for smu → mu LSP vs LSP mass for different smu masses

ECM = 0.6 TeV e+e- -> smu+ smu-

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 50 100 150 200 250 300LSP mass (GeV)

Max

imum

mis

sing

PT

(GeV

)

300 GeV200 GeV100 GeV

Page 12: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

12

Hermeticity Requirements

• Hep-ph/040601 (2004) P. Bambade et al.• Experimental Implications for a LC of the

SUSY Dark Matter Scenario• M(LSP) = 212GeV, M(stau) = 217 GeV• Need to veto ee→ee and ee→ee

backgrounds at 10-3 level – being studied by Tel Aviv as part of FCAL effort.

• BNL will study Bhabha pileup

Page 13: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

13

Luminosity Normalization

• Goal is precision measurement to 2 10-4

• Bhabha cross-section in forward direction

(mrad) 118

2/sin2/cos1

8

2max

2min

4

2

2

2

BXN

Edd

Page 14: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

14

Possible Readout Architecture F. Lanni

Page 15: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

15

Forward Detector R&D Synergy with LHC Effort

• Simulation studies (p.20)• Integration studies (p.21)• Mechanical design (p.22)• Readout (p.23)• Detail detector design (p.24)• Material studies (p.25)• Hadronic calorimeter (p.26)• SiD web site: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/

Page 16: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

16

Conclusions

• Part of SiD Study since Fall 2005 (mostly U.S. based)

• Part of FCAL Study since March 2006 (mostly Europe based)

• Synergy with BNL S.C. Magnet Div.• Synergy with BNL Instrumentation Div.• Synergy with LHC Effort

Page 17: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

17

Extra Slides

Page 18: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

18

Where Do The Pairs Go?

• Analytic Calculation

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

E (GeV)

max

bet

atro

n di

st (c

m)

L=2mL=0.5m

Page 19: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

19

Page 20: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

20

Simulation Studies• Optimization of the design taking in to account

space, cost and technology. This includes segmentation, both longitudinal and transverse and the dynamic range needed. We expect that the simulation studies will need a few iterations to help in optimizing the system integration aspects as well as cost. Preliminary decisions Dec. 06, Baseline Detector Layout: Mid ’07. The baseline should define in details the specifications and the parameters for the Beam Cal and the Luminosity Cal. Studies to be done by Physicists – assume baseline support.

Page 21: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

21

Integration Studies• The forward region is very crowded and the

space needs to be shared with the magnets of the final focus, beam pipes, forward calorimeters and their services. Detailed engineering studies to integrate and coordinate these requirements needs to be done at an early stage. Conceptual design for space allocation, services, access and installation by fall of ’06 and a baseline design by mid ’07. Design effort: ¼ Designer time. Baseline should be ready in one year to allow for space allocation between the different detector and first layout of services routing.

Page 22: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

22

Mechanical Design• The forward calorimeters have special

requirements. For example, we expect that the beam pipes will need to be integrated with the Beam Cal to achieve maximal coverage. Detailed mechanical design that takes into account the constraint imposed by the space limitation needs to take place. This should include the support of the calorimeters off the forward tube. Conceptual design end of ’06. Baseline design fall of ’07. Mechanical Engineer/Designer: ½ FTE. Technician: Prototype work on assembly concepts.

Page 23: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

23

Readout

• Define readout architecture, develop readout solutions and test some of the ideas in the Lab and/ or test beams. The readout work should include calculations of the Beam Cal feedback needed for the machine as well as for physics events. Conceptual design and detail specifications by end of ’06 , Baseline readout architecture 18 month from now. Electronic Eng: 1/3 of an electronic Eng.

Page 24: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

24

Detail Detector Design

• Once the readout and the mechanical layout are established a detail integration of the readout and the mechanical set up is needed. This will include the layout of the Si sensors, routing of the signals to the readout and cabling of the detector.

Page 25: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

25

Material Studies• The radiation level in the forward direction

implies that one will need to probably specify specialized Si material. One needs to select the materials and expose them to radiation levels equivalent to what will be seen at the ILC forward region over period of 5 years. BNL Instrumentation Division has a facility that will allow us to do this. Selection of material and radiation tests – end of ’06 early ’07. Selection of Sensor material mid ’08. ¼ designer for preparation of Si wafers for tests, plus material costs.

Page 26: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

26

Hadronic Calorimeter• Depending on the technology choice for the

Hadronic calorimeter for SiD, the Forward section of the Hadronic calorimeter might need to have a different technology. The R&D part will include choice of technology for the forward hadronic calorimeter and a detail design. Designer 1/3 time, Technician ½ time, ME 1/3 time. For the above we would like to test some of the ideas and build a mechanical prototype and, given the financial resources, to test it in a beam. This effort should be coordinated with other prototypes in SiD.

Page 27: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

27

Total of Above Forward Region Manpower

• One man-year each: tech, designer, ME, EE

• 3 physicists 2 years• 1 Simulation• 1 Readout R&D coordination• 1 Integration of the Forward region

• Present level of effort is 1.3 physicists and 0.2 tech, designer, ME, EE; so it will take 5 years, not 2 years.

Page 28: ILC Detector R&D

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006

28

Particle Flow• ILC is a precision measurement machine.• The hope is particle flow will give 30%/E0.5 jet

resolution which is needed to do precision measurements.

• Situation in Europe is about three dozen very smart people working 20% of their time on PFA.

• The U.S. is effort is not as large.• US effort needs better coordination – BNL can

make a difference.


Recommended