+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Immunization of Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, Against...

Immunization of Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, Against...

Date post: 06-May-2019
Category:
Upload: vodan
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
MFR PAPER 1289 JOHN H. SCHACHTE, Jr. Immunization of Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, Against Two Bacterial Diseases ABSTRACT-A field study was begun to compare the efficacy of three different routes of immunization of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, intensively cultured in cages. A polyvalent bacterin against Aeromonas hydrophila and Flexibacter columnaris was administered by oral, injection, and immersion routes. Initial data indicated a humoral antibody response to all three routes. Thirty-day post- immunization agglutinin titers were as high as 1: 1,280 in fish injected with bacterin, 1:160 in immersion-treated fish, and 1:20 in orally immunized fish. Gut mucosal extracts of identical fish had precipitin titers as high as 1:5,120 in immersed fish, 1:320 in orally immunized fish, and 1:160 in injected fish. Control titers were 1:80. No significant difference in protective immunity was detected. These data reflect initial results of a 2V2-year study which will be reported in full at a later date. John H. Schachte, Jr., was with the Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, Alabama Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn Univer- sity, Auburn, AL 36830. Present ad- dress: Fish Disease Control Unit, Rome Fisheries Laboratory, 8314 Fish Hatchery Road, Rome, NY 13440. cular dose of bacterin with adjuvant while the immersion treatment con- sisted of the addition of bulk vaccine directly to the tank such that the final dilution was 1/126. Fish fed vaccine were administered treated feed every other day for a total of six treated ra- tions; controls were held under identi- cal conditions without bacterin ad- ministration. Following a suitable period for response to the bacterin, all fish were stocked randomly by treat- ment into 12 respective 0.75-m 3 cages anchored on a line in a 4.8-acre pond. At 30 days postimmunization, a sub- sample was removed from each treat- ment group and the control group. Serum, surface mucus, and gut muco- sal samples were collected and titered using microtiter techniques. Serum was titered against A. hydrophila and F. columnaris whole cell antigens, while mucosal extracts were tested against sonicates of the same organisms using a capillary tube precipitin technique. RESULTS OF IMMUNIZATION Following the 5-month experimental period, during which infections of both bacteria were diagnosed, the fish were counted for survival data. Sixty-eight percent of the controls survived, while 66 percent of the orally treated, 78 per- cent of the immersion treated, and 80 percent of the injected fish survived. Thirty day postimmunization agglu- tinin titers of injected fish were as high as 1: I ,280, I: 160 in immersion-treated fish, and only 1:20 in feed-treated fish. Precipitin titers in gut mucosal extracts from the same fish were as high as 1:5,120 in immersed fish, 1:320 in feed-treated fish, and 1: 160 in injected fish. Controls had a titer of 1:80 which was considered to be a result of expo- sure prior to the experiment. Statistical munizing channel catfish in cages against A. hydrophila and F. colum- naris. The experiment was designed to test the level of protective immunity by observations of survival following natural infection with these bacteria in a pond. The experimental pond had a 5-year history of epizootics of these or- ganisms in the cage culture of catfish. Differences in response of fish to three routes of administration of the bacterin were also measured by survival data, titering fish sera, and mucosal samples for cirCUlating and secretory antibody. Twenty-four hundred channel catfish fingerlings were selected and divided into four groups of 600 fish, each group in a 730-liter tank. Three 600-fish groups were designated for bacterin administration by either injection, immersion, or oral routes, and the re- maining group served as a control. A heat-inactivated polyvalent bacterin with adjuvant was prepared with A. hydrophila and F. columnaris. Injected fish received a single 0.2 ml intramus- METHODS OF TEST IMMUNIZATIONS During the spring of 1974 a study was begun to test the possibility of im- During recent years, cultural and nutritional studies with channel catfish, lctalurus punctatus, at the Fisheries Research Unit at Auburn University have been plagued with bacterial dis- ease problems. Epizootics of Aero- monas hydrophila and Flexibacter co- lumnaris have been particularly troublesome in intensive culture techniques such as in pens and cages. These bacteria are also of importance in open pond culture, particularly under poor environmental conditions. Experiments conducted at Auburn in 1972 indicated that the channel catfish would produce high circulating anti- body titers when injected with a heat- killed bacterin. Additional studies also revealed that agglutinin titers as high as I: 160 could be induced following a single immersion treatment of bacterin. /8 Marine Fisheries Review
Transcript

MFR PAPER 1289

JOHN H. SCHACHTE, Jr.

Immunization of Channel Catfish,Ictalurus punctatus, Against TwoBacterial Diseases

ABSTRACT-A field study was begun to compare the efficacy of three differentroutes of immunization of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, intensively culturedin cages. A polyvalent bacterin against Aeromonas hydrophila and Flexibactercolumnaris was administered by oral, injection, and immersion routes. Initial dataindicated a humoral antibody response to all three routes. Thirty-day post­immunization agglutinin titers were as high as 1:1,280 in fish injected with bacterin,1:160 in immersion-treated fish, and 1:20 in orally immunized fish. Gut mucosalextracts of identical fish had precipitin titers as high as 1:5,120 in immersed fish,1:320 in orally immunized fish, and 1:160 in injected fish. Control titers were 1:80.No significant difference in protective immunity was detected. These data reflectinitial results of a 2V2-year study which will be reported in full at a later date.

John H. Schachte, Jr., was with theDepartment of Fisheries and AlliedAquacultures, Alabama AgricultureExperiment Station, Auburn Univer­sity, Auburn, AL 36830. Present ad­dress: Fish Disease Control Unit,Rome Fisheries Laboratory, 8314Fish Hatchery Road, Rome, NY13440.

cular dose of bacterin with adjuvantwhile the immersion treatment con­sisted of the addition of bulk vaccinedirectly to the tank such that the finaldilution was 1/126. Fish fed vaccinewere administered treated feed everyother day for a total of six treated ra­tions; controls were held under identi­cal conditions without bacterin ad­ministration. Following a suitableperiod for response to the bacterin, allfish were stocked randomly by treat­ment into 12 respective 0.75-m 3 cagesanchored on a line in a 4.8-acre pond.

At 30 days postimmunization, a sub­sample was removed from each treat­ment group and the control group.Serum, surface mucus, and gut muco­sal samples were collected and titeredusing microtiter techniques. Serum wastitered against A. hydrophila and F.columnaris whole cell antigens, whilemucosal extracts were tested againstsonicates of the same organisms using acapillary tube precipitin technique.

RESULTS OF IMMUNIZATION

Following the 5-month experimentalperiod, during which infections of bothbacteria were diagnosed, the fish werecounted for survival data. Sixty-eightpercent of the controls survived, while66 percent of the orally treated, 78 per­cent of the immersion treated, and 80percent of the injected fish survived.Thirty day postimmunization agglu­tinin titers of injected fish were as highas 1: I ,280, I: 160 in immersion-treatedfish, and only 1:20 in feed-treated fish.Precipitin titers in gut mucosal extractsfrom the same fish were as high as1:5,120 in immersed fish, 1:320 infeed-treated fish, and 1: 160 in injectedfish. Controls had a titer of 1:80 whichwas considered to be a result of expo­sure prior to the experiment. Statistical

munizing channel catfish in cagesagainst A. hydrophila and F. colum­naris. The experiment was designed totest the level of protective immunity byobservations of survival followingnatural infection with these bacteria in apond. The experimental pond had a5-year history of epizootics of these or­ganisms in the cage culture of catfish.Differences in response of fish to threeroutes of administration of the bacterinwere also measured by survival data,titering fish sera, and mucosal samplesfor cirCUlating and secretory antibody.Twenty-four hundred channel catfishfingerlings were selected and dividedinto four groups of 600 fish, each groupin a 730-liter tank. Three 600-fishgroups were designated for bacterinadministration by either injection,immersion, or oral routes, and the re­maining group served as a control. Aheat-inactivated polyvalent bacterinwith adjuvant was prepared with A.hydrophila and F. columnaris. Injectedfish received a single 0.2 ml intramus-

METHODS OF TESTIMMUNIZATIONS

During the spring of 1974 a studywas begun to test the possibility of im-

During recent years, cultural andnutritional studies with channel catfish,lctalurus punctatus, at the FisheriesResearch Unit at Auburn Universityhave been plagued with bacterial dis­ease problems. Epizootics of Aero­monas hydrophila and Flexibacter co­lumnaris have been particularlytroublesome in intensive culturetechniques such as in pens and cages.These bacteria are also of importance inopen pond culture, particularly underpoor environmental conditions.

Experiments conducted at Auburn in1972 indicated that the channel catfishwould produce high circulating anti­body titers when injected with a heat­killed bacterin. Additional studies alsorevealed that agglutinin titers as high asI: 160 could be induced following asingle immersion treatment of bacterin.

/8 Marine Fisheries Review

MFR Paper 1289. From Marine Fisheries Review, Vol. 40, No.3, March 1978.Copies of this paper, in limited numbers, are available from D822, User Ser­vices Branch, Environmental Science Information Center, NOAA, Rockville,MD 20852. Copies of Marine Fisheries Review are available from the Superin­tendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC20402 for $1.10 each.

analysis of survival data revealed nosignificant differences (P ;;':0.05) be­tween treatment groups and the controlgroup or among treatment groups. Thiswas thought to be a result of a highdegree of variation encountered in thecages. However, percentage valuesseem to indicate that the immersion andinjection routes might give significantresults with further studies. The factthat there is a circulating and secretoryantibody response to the immersionroute seems to indicate that furtherrefinement of this technique may resultin an effective immunization method

which will eliminate individual handl­ing of each fish.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research is supported by theSoutheastern Cooperative Fish Disease

Project and, in part, by Sport Fish Res­toration Funds, S-83 Regional CatfishResearch Project, and a grant throughthe Tennessee Game and Fish Commis­sion of PL 88-309 funds from the Na­tional Marine Fisheries Service.

March 1978 19


Recommended