+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Immunological Bioinformatics

Immunological Bioinformatics

Date post: 27-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: oakley
View: 29 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Immunological Bioinformatics. Processing, combined predictions, and rational epitope selection. Cellular Immunity. Proteasome specificity. Low polymorphism Constitutive & Immuno-proteasome Evolutionary conserved Stochastic and low specificity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
33
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSIS Department of Systems Biology Technical University of Denmark Immunological Bioinformatics Processing, combined predictions, and rational epitope selection
Transcript
Page 1: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Immunological Bioinformatics

Processing, combined predictions, and rational

epitope selection

Page 2: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Cellular Immunity

Page 3: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Proteasome specificity

Low polymorphism– Constitutive & Immuno-

proteasome

Evolutionary conserved Stochastic and low specificity

– Only 70-80% of the cleavage sites are reproduced in repeated experiments

Page 4: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Proteasome evolution (1 unit)

Constitutive

Immuno

Human (Hs) - HumanDrosophila (Dm) - Fly

Bos Taurus (Bota) - CowOncorhynchus mykiss (Om) - Fish

Page 5: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Immuno- and Constitutive proteasome specificity

...LVGPTPVNIIGRNMLTQL..

P1 P1’

Immuno Constitutive

Page 6: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

NetChop– Neural network based method

PaProc– Weight matrix based method

FragPredict– Based on a statistical analysis of cleavage-

determining amino acid motifs present around the scissile bond• i.e. also weight matrix like

Predicting proteasomal cleavage

Page 7: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

NetChop 3.0 Cterm (MHC ligands)

LDFVRFMGVMSSCNNPA LVQEKYLEYRQVPDSDP RTQDENPVVHFFKNIVT TPLIPLTIFVGENTGVP LVPVEPDKVEEATEGEN YMLDLQPETTDLYCYEQ PVESMETTMRSPVFTDN ISEYRHYCYSLYGTTLE AAVDAGMAMAGQSPVLR QPKKVKRRLFETRELTD LGEFYNQMMVKAGLNDD GYGGRASDYKSAHKGLK KTKDIVNGLRSVQTFAD LVGFLLLKYRAREPVTK SVDPKNYPKKKMEKRFV SSSSTPLLYPSLALPAP FLYGALLLAEGFYTTGA

NetChop-3.0 C-term– Trained on class I

epitopes– Most epitopes are

generated by the immuno proteasome

– Predicts the immuno proteasome specificity

Page 8: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

NetChop20S-3.0In vitro digest data from the constitutive proteasome

Toes et al., J.exp.med. 2001

Page 9: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Prediction performance

Sens =TP

AP

Spec =TN

AN

CC =TP ⋅TN − FN ⋅FPPP ⋅AN ⋅AP ⋅PN

TPFP

APAN

Aroc=0.5

Aroc=0.8

1 - spec

Sen

s

Page 10: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Predicting proteasomal cleavage

-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

1

Performance

FragPredictPAProCI Netchop2.0NetChop3.0

Sens Spec CC

0

0.5

1

Performance

CC PCC Aroc

CC 0.12 0.1 0.41 0.48

PCC 0.13 0.48 0.55

Aroc 0.56 0.82 0.85

FragPredict PAProCI Netchop20S NetChop20S-3.0

NetChop20S-3.0

NetChop-3.0

• Relative poor predictive performance–For MHC prediction CC~0.92 and AUC~0.95

Page 11: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Proteasome specificity

NetChop is one of the best available cleavage method– www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetChop-3.0

Page 12: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Cellular Immunity

Page 13: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

What does TAP do?

Page 14: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

TAP affinity prediction

Transporter Associated with antigen Processing Binds peptides 9-18 long Binding determined mostly by N1-3 and C terminal amino acids

Page 15: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

A low matrix entry corresponds to an amino acid well suited for TAP binding

TAP binding motif matrix

Peters et el., 2003. JI, 171: 1741.

Page 16: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

TAP affinity prediction

Page 17: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Predicting TAP affinity

9 meric peptides >9 meric

Peters et el., 2003. JI, 171: 1741.

ILRGTSFVYV-0.11 + 0.09 - 0.42 - 0.3 = -0.74

Page 18: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Integrating all three steps (protesaomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC binding) should lead to improved identification of peptides capable of eliciting CTL responses

Integration?

Page 19: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Identifying CTL epitopes

1 EBN3_EBV YQAYSSWMY 2.56 1.00 0.03 0.34 0.99 0.02 0.01 0.75 0.94 0.92 2.97 0 2.802 EBN3_EBV QSDETATSH 2.22 0.01 0.28 0.88 0.04 0.83 0.51 0.30 0.11 0.99 -0.80 0 2.283 EBN3_EBV PVSPAVNQY 1.55 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.22 0.21 1.00 0.02 0.04 1.00 2.63 0 1.784 EBN3_EBV AYSSWMYSY 1.31 0.34 0.99 0.02 0.01 0.75 0.94 0.92 0.09 1.00 3.28 1 1.585 EBN3_EBV LAAGWPMGY 1.02 1.00 0.97 0.22 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.06 0.01 1.00 3.01 0 1.276 EBN3_EBV IVQSCNPRY 0.99 0.10 0.97 0.50 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.93 3.19 0 1.247 EBN3_EBV FLQRTDLSY 0.94 0.46 0.99 0.02 0.82 0.07 0.01 0.63 0.01 0.96 2.79 0 1.188 EBN3_EBV YTDHQTTPT 1.15 1.00 0.01 0.42 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.54 0.14 -0.87 0 1.129 EBN3_EBV GTDVVQHQL 0.96 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.99 1.00 0.02 0.46 0.30 1.00 0.53 0 1.09...

HLA affinity

Proteasomal cleavage

TAP affinity

Page 20: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Page 21: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Large scale method validation

HIV A3 epitope predictions

Page 22: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Pathogen and population coverage

How to hit them all in a few strokes

Page 23: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

HCV Genotypes

Page 24: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Genotype Variation

Page 25: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Genotype variation

de Oliveira et al., Nature 444, 836-837(14 December 2006)

HIV-1 CRF02_AG (a), HCV genotype 4 (b) and HCV genotype 1 (c)

Page 26: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Genotype 1

Top Scoring Peptides Top Scoring Peptides

Genotype 2

Genotype 3

Genotype 4

Genotype 5

Genotype 6

Select peptide with maximal coverage

Select peptide with maximal coverage

preferring uncovered strains

Select peptide with maximal coverage preferring lowest covered strains

Repeat until the Repeat until the desired number of desired number of

peptides is selectedpeptides is selected

GenoCover

Page 27: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Genotype 1

Genotype 2

Genotype 3

Genotype 4

Genotype 5

Genotype 6

QPRGRRQPIQPRGRRQPI

PeptidePeptide Predicted Predicted affinity (nM)affinity (nM)

55

SPRGSRPSWSPRGSRPSW 4343

GenomeGenomeCoverageCoverage

55

44

DPRRRSRNLDPRRRSRNL** 336666

RARAVRAKLRARAVRAKL

PeptidesPeptides

66 33

TPAETTVRLTPAETTVRL** 3838 33

33

33

22

33

44

33

* Verified B7 supertype restricted CD8+ epitope in the Los Alamos HCV epitope database

HCV Results - B7

Page 28: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Population Diversity

http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/population-six-billion-1.jpg

Page 29: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

MHC-Cover

HLA-A*0101

Top Scoring Peptides Top Scoring Peptides

HLA-A*0201

HLA-A*0301

HLA-B*0702

HLA-B*2705

HLA-B*4402

Select peptide with maximal MHC

coverage

Select peptide with maximal MHC

coverage preferring uncovered MHCs

Select peptide with maximal MHC

coverage preferring lowest

covered HLAs

Repeat until the Repeat until the desired number of desired number of

peptides is selectedpeptides is selected

Page 30: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Population diversity

http://www.piperreport.com/archives/Images/Marketing%20to%20Diverse%20Medicare%20Population.jpg

Page 31: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

MHC-Cover

HLA-A*0101

Top Scoring Peptides Top Scoring Peptides

HLA-A*0201

HLA-A*0301

HLA-B*0702

HLA-B*2705

HLA-B*4402

Select peptide with maximal

population coverage

Select peptide with maximal coverage

preferring uncovered MHCs

with highest population coverage

Select peptide with maximal coverage preferring lowest

covered HLAs with highest population

coverage

Repeat until the Repeat until the desired number of desired number of

peptides is selectedpeptides is selected

Page 32: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Epi-select

HLA-A*0101

HLA-A*0201

HLA-A*0301

HLA-B*0702

HLA-B*2705

HLA-B*4402

Select peptide with maximal

population coverage and

maximal genotype coverage

Select peptide with maximal coverage

preferring uncovered MHCs

with highest population

coverage and maximal genotype

coverage Select peptide with maximal coverage preferring lowest

covered HLAs with highest population

coverage and maximal genotype

coverage

Repeat until the Repeat until the desired number of desired number of

peptides is selectedpeptides is selected

Genotype 1

Genotype 2

Genotype 3

Genotype 4

Genotype 5

Genotype 6

Page 33: Immunological Bioinformatics

CEN

TER

FO

R B

IOLO

GIC

AL S

EQ

UEN

CE A

NA

LY

SIS

Department of Systems Biology

Technical University of Denmark

Reaching optimal coverage

HCV Genotypes


Recommended