Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bradyn-sager |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
IMPACT
CAPE-P: DNB Power Analysis Code for PWR FUEL Assembly- Evaluation Method -
Analytical Step Calculation Method
3. Detection of DNB
1. Fuel Bundle
2. Each Subchannel
3-D Subchannel Analysis with Drift-flux Model
Weismann Model, or Katto’s Model as Option
3-D Two-Phase Flow Analysis with Non-homogeneous and Non-equilibrium Two-fluid Model
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Outline of 3-D Two-phase Flow Analysis Module
Analysis Coordinate: Cartesian Coordinate
Basic Equations- one pressure, non-homogeneous and non-equilibrium two-fluid model - mass, energy and three momentum conservation equations for vapor and liquid phases
Constitutive Equations- Lateral lift forces acting on bubbles: Suffman force, Wall effect force and Bubble dispersion force. Model coefficients were given by empirical correlations. - Turbulence Model: Sato model The eddy viscosity induced by bubbles was considered.
- Interfacial drag force: Andersen model (C0,Vgj: Ishii model) - Interfacial heat transfer coefficient: Plesset and Zwick model for Saturated boiling and Unal model for Subcooled boiling
Fuel rod
Core region
Bubbly layer
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Outline of DNB Evaluation Module (Weisman Model) A bubbly layer is formed by build-up of bubbles near the wall, under
subcooled boiling condition.
DNB occurs when a void fraction of the bubbly layer exceeds the critical value.
In the calculation, nearest meshes from the wall are defined as a bubbly layer.
Heated wall
Bubbly layer Core
region
bubble
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Verification of Two Phasae Flow Analysis Model (1) NUPEC Test - Void Distribution in Single Channel -
• Single channel void distribution tests under PWR conditions by NUPEC
- Horizontal void distributions were measured.
- Heated length : 1.825m , Measurements : 1.400m from the bottom
Test Vessel (Titanium Alloy)
Heater (Inconel)
Measurement
0.5
1.0
0.0
Void Fraction
Insulator (Alminum)
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Verification of Two Phase Flow Analysis Model(2) Result of Void Distribution at High Pressure
Pressure: 14.7 MPa
Mass Flux: 5.0106 kg/m2h
Power: 60 kW
Inlet Temperature: 573 K3-D Analysis Result
Measured
Higher Void Fraction
0.4
0.5
0.6
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Verification of Two Phase Flow Analysis Model(3) Result of Void Distribution at Low Pressure
3-D Analysis ResultMeasured
Pressure: 4.9 MPa
Mass Flux: 5.0106 kg/m2h
Power: 80 kW
Inlet Temperature: 573 K
0.6
0.4
0.8
Lower Void Fraction
heated l ength3. 658m
gri d spacer wi thmi xi ng vanes
9.5mm12.6mm
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(1) NUPEC Test Apparatus and Analysis Region
Heated Length: 3.658 m
Grid Spacer with Mixing Vanes
12.6 mm 9.5 mm
: High Power Rod (pf=1.0)
: Low Power Rod (pf=0.85)
Subchannel Analysis Region
3-D Two-phase Flow Analysis
Region
Number of Grids:
1212135=19440
: with porous
Mesh arrangement of XY section
fuel rod
135 grids
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(2) Grid Model of Three-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow Analysis
IMPACT
7.0C
alc
ula
ted
DN
B p
ow
er
(MW
)
Measured DNB power (MW)
Average difference: -4.9%
=6.7% (Standard deviation)
Pressure: 7.35-16.6 MPa Mass flux: 2-14 106 kg/m2hInlet subcooling: 126-502 kJ/kg
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Test Bundle:
55 Full scale
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(3) Analysis Result
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 4 8 12 16
Pressure (MPa)
DN
B P
ow
er
(kW
)
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(4) Pressure Effect on DNB Power
: Measured
: Calculated
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Mass Flux (106 kg/m2h)
DN
B P
ow
er
(kW
)
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(5) Effect of Mass Flux on DNB Power
: Measured
: Calculated
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
100 200 300 400 500 600
Inlet Subcooling (kJ/kg)
DN
B P
ow
er
(kW
)
IMPACT
CAPE-P: Validation by NUPEC Full Length 55 Test Analysis
(6) Effect of Inlet Subcooling on DNB Power
: Measured
: Calculated