IMPRESS ON SW WORKSHOP

APRIL 2016

Asensio Navarro Hernández

IMPACT. EXAMPLES IN KONYA CLOSED BASIN AND BÜYÜK

MENDERES BASIN

INDEX

1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜK MENDERES

ABOUT IMPACTS.

1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.

Water bodies and their impacts are classified in:

• WB with verified impact.

• WB with likely impact.

• WB with no apparent impact.

• WB with no data on their status.

Because the monitoring of water bodies under the WFD is not available yet, the

impacts on the water bodies, at this first step, are analyzed by the thresholds of

the Turkish legislation: Surface Water Quality By-Law CRG-30/11/2012-28483

(Amended statement: OG-15/4/2015-29327) and the Water Pollution Control By-

law RG-13/2/2008-26786.

Only the classification of water quality done by the River Basin Protection

Action Plan of each river/closed basin under the repealed law (Water Pollution

Control By-law RG-13/2/2008-26786) is available.

1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.

The class of water quality defined by the Water Pollution Control By-law RG-

13/2/2008-26786 and their consideration as impacts are:

• Class I could be considered as “No impact” for chemical and physicochemical

quality.

• Class II could be considered as “Likely impact” for chemical and

physicochemical quality.

• Class III and IV could be considered as “Verified Impact”.

• Bacteriological parameters (D) could be used for protected areas.

The water bodies with information about impact, based on the previous legislation

(RG-13/2/2008-26786), and considered the “global quality” of each water body

(the worst "water quality class" among all groups of parameters analyzed in each

water body).

The future detailed impact analysis, in line with the WFD requirements, will be

done with the results of the monitoring that is now in progress.

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community

400000 500000 600000

41

00

00

042

00

00

043

00

00

0

¯0 20 40 6010km

1:1.200.000Scale:

Title:

Legend:

Technical Assistance for Conversion of River Basin Action Plans into River Basin Management Plans

Impact evaluation in surface waterbodies in Konya Closed Basin

Date: 01 - February - 2016

IMPACTS River Water Bodies

Verified

No data

IMPACTS Lakes Water Bodies

Verified

No data

Konya Close Basin

Konya Close Basin Boundary

Ref. Drawing:GIS_005_2.03.05_&_2.03.09_KO_EN_V00_R00

General Notes:

Example nº1

Example nº2

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü Memba)

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü Memba)

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº2: Çarşamba Çayı 3 (Apa Barajı Memba)

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Examples nº1 and 2 Konya Closed Basin

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

KONYA CLOSED BASIN PRESSURES IMPACT

Water body code Water body namePoint source of

pollution

Diffuse source of

pollution

Water abstraction

and flow regulation

Morphological

alterations

Other human

pressuresImpact level

TR1602NEH021261702 Çarşamba Çayı 3 (Apa Barajı Memba) X X X X NO data

TR1608NEH011240201Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü

Memba)X X X Verified

[1] blue cell = pressure inventoried, and marked blue cell with "x " = significant pressure

Only 14 of the 92 surface waterbodies (rivers and dams) have quality analysis (15.21%).

Therefore, only it´s possible to calculate the impact in these water bodies.

Detailed results are:

• 1 waterbody (1.08%) with class III quality (verified impact).

• 1 waterbody (1.08%) with class III and class IV quality (verified impact).

• 12 waterbodies (13.04%) with class IV quality (verified impact).

• 78 waterbodies (84.78%) without quality determination

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community

500000 600000 700000 800000

41

00

00

042

00

00

043

00

00

0

¯0 10 20 305km

1:1.000.000Scale:

Title:

Legend:

Technical Assistance for Conversion of River Basin Action Plans into River Basin Management Plans

Impact evaluation in inland surfacewater bodies in Büyük Menderes Basin

Ref. Drawing:GIS_005_2.03.05_&_2.03.09_BM_EN_V00_R00

General Notes:

Date: 01 - February - 2016

IMPACTS River Water Bodies

No data

Likely

Verified

IMPACTS Lake Water Bodies

No data

River Basin Boundary

River Basin District Boundary

Coastal Water BodiesExample nº1

Example nº2

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº2: Girme Deresi

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº2: Girme Deresi

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Example nº2: Girme Deresi

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

Examples nº1 and 2 Büyük-Menderes Basin

2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS

[1] blue cell = pressure inventoried, and marked blue cell with "x " = significant pressure

BÜYÜK MENDERES BASIN PRESSURES IMPACT

Water body code Water body namePoint source of

pollution

Diffuse source of

pollution

Water abstraction

and flow regulation

Morphological

alterations

Other human

pressures

Impact

level

TR0702NEH011262002 Yukarı Büyük Menderes 1 X X X X Verified

TR0709NEH011147301 Girme Deresi 2 X Likely

Only 21 of the 129 (16.27%) inland surface waterbodies have quality

analysis. Therefore, only it´s possible to calculate the risk in these water

bodies.

Detailed results are:

• 1 waterbody (0.77%) with class II quality (Likely impact).

• 7 waterbodies (5.42%) with class III quality (verified impact).

• 1 waterbody (0.77%) with class III and class IV quality (verified impact).

• 12 waterbodies (9.30%) with class IV quality (verified impact).

• 108 waterbodies (83.5%) without quality determination.