+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann...

Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann...

Date post: 26-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: austin-kearney
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
19
Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries Braunschweig/Germany IEA Bioenergy Seminar Ludlow, 17 April 2008
Transcript
Page 1: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production

P. WeilandJohann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI)

Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and FisheriesBraunschweig/Germany

IEA Bioenergy Seminar

Ludlow, 17 April 2008

Page 2: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Contents

Introduction

Plant construction

Substrates for biogas production

LCA of biogas production

Gas grid injection act

Amendment of the EEG (actual draft)

Page 3: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Biogas plants in Germany

100 120 139 159 186274 370

450617

8501050

1300

16001750

2050

2700

3500

3750

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Nu

mb

er o

f p

lan

ts

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Page 4: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

10,99

6

2

2

9,46

6

2

2

8,51

4

2

2

8,03

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

Eu

ro-C

t/kW

h el

< 150 kW >150-500 kW >500 KW-5 MW >5-20 MW

CHP-Bonus

Technology bonus

Biomass bonus

Basic fee

Compensation for electricity 2007 (EEG)

Page 5: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Substrate application in agricultural biogas plants (2005-2007)

83%

15%2%

Energy crops and manureEnergy crops

Manure

Page 6: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Use of renewable raw materials(2005 – 2006)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Silage

mai

ze

Cerea

l gra

ins

Total

cere

als

Grass

sila

ge

Grass

Corn

Cob Mix

Mai

ze g

rain

s

Sunflo

wers

Energy crops type

Fre

qu

ency

of

use

[%

] More than 90 % of new biogas plants use silage maize

Page 7: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Share of energy crops on substrate input

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0-24 25-49 50-69 70-89 90-99 100

Mass ratio of energy crops on substrate input [%]

Rel

ativ

e fr

equ

ency

[%

]

2/3 of the biogas plants have more than 50 % energy crops in the input

Page 8: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Growing substrate costs since 2006

100105110115120125130135140145150

Jul06

Aug06

Sep06

Oct06

Nov06

Dec06

Jan07

Feb07

Mar07

Apr07

May07

Jun07

Bre

ad w

hea

t [E

UR

/to

n]

Silage maize without transport and ensiling

Oct 06: 18 EUR/ton FM – Oct 07: 33 EUR/ton FM

Cost increase: 83 %

Page 9: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Specific investment costs for biogas plants

Spec. investvestment costs €/kWel

Installed electric capacity [kWel]

Source: DZ-Bank

Page 10: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Profit of a 500 kW biogas plant with silage maize(7,750 h/a, ηel=37 %, no heat utilization)

Silage maize

[EUR/ton]

Investment costs [EUR/kWel]

3,000 3,500 4,000

18.00 155,500 129,800 104,000

20.00 135,800 110,000 84,300

22.00 116,00 90,300 64,600

24.00 96,200 70,500 44,800

26.00 76,500 50,700 25,000

28.00 56,700 31,000 5,300

30.00 36,900 22,200 -14,500

Source: DZ Bank

Page 11: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Reduction of the greenhouse effect by biogas production

Source: Pehnt, IFEU 2007

Page 12: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

LCA of biogas plants (1)

In most of the applications biogas production result in reduction of greenhouse gases.

The best ecological effect can be achieved by anaerobic treatment of manure.

For biogas production with energy crops up to 60 % of the relevant ecological effects are caused by crop production (e.g. fuels consump-tion for sewing, fertilization, harvesting, transport).

Energy crops with a high biomass yield per area should be used to reduce the ecological effect of this module.

Page 13: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

LCA of biogas plants (2)

Without gas-tight covering of the storage tank biogas production can have a negative climate effect (methane losses: 2-10 %).

The utilization of the heat from the CHP is important for a positive ecological effect.

Biogas upgrading and gas injection with conventional upgrading technologies can enhance the greenhouse gas emissions.

The lowest methane losses can be achieved by using mono ethanol amine scrubbing (MEA: 0,1%) for biogas upgrading.

Page 14: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

New gas grid injection act (Gasnetzzugangsverordnung)

On 12 March 2008 the German Federal Cabinet has decided a new gas injection act in order to promote the injection of biomethane (BNG) into the gas grid.

The aim of the act is to substitute at least 10 % of the natural gas consumption up to 2030 by biogas.

This act regulates the priority of connections to the grid for suppliers of upgraded biogas.

A considerable part of the costs for gas injection have to be paid by the grid operators and not by the biogas producers.

Page 15: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Important regulations of the gas injection act (1)

Gas grid operators must connect biogas plants to the grid (obligatory connection).

50 % of the costs for the grid connection must be paid by the grid operator.

The grid operator is responsible for the odo-rization, the control of the gas quality and the compression to the grid pressure and has to cover all these costs.

The gas can be supplied by the biogas plant at various pressures according the different up-grading processes.

Page 16: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Important regulations of the gas injection act (2)

The gas transport customer will receive a fee from the gas grid operator to the amount of 0,7 €-Cent/kWh because gas grid operator saves costs for long distance transport.

The methane losses by upgrading must be lower than 1 % within the next 3 years, and afterwards maximally 0,5 %.

The injected gas must be feed-out within 12 month with a flexibility of 25 %.

Page 17: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Amendment of the EEG act (actual draft)

The basic fee is enhanced by 1 ct/kWhel for biogas plants with a capacity lower than 150 kW (11.67 ct/kWhel).

The biomass bonus is enhanced from 6 ct/kWhel to 8 ct/kWhel for biogas plants up to 500 kW.

A manure bonus of 2 ct/kWhel is paid for biogas plants with a capacity lower than 150 kWel if at least 30 vol-% manure is used for biogas production.

The CHP-bonus is enhanced from 2 ct/kWhel to 3 ct/kWhel.

The technology bonus of 2 ct/kWhel is cancelled for dry fermentation and will be paid for biogas upgrading if the methane losses are maximum 0.5 vol-%.

The total fee (not only the basic fee) will be reduced by 1 % per year.

Page 18: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Outlook

• A competition between food and biogas production does not exist, because only 2 % (350,000 ha) of the agricultural land is used for energy crops.

• The increased costs for energy crops are the result of the high world market prices (increased demand in USA, India, China, Brasilia).

• The share of small biogas plants which use manure, intermediate crops and organic wastes increases.

• The number of large biogas plants with gas injection into grid increases.

• Without using the heat from CHP most of the biogas plants cannot make a profit in future.

Page 19: Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production P. Weiland Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute (vTI) Federal Research Institute.

Many thanks for your attention!

IEA Bioenergy SeminarLudlow, 17 April 2008


Recommended