U n i v e r s i t y O f O l d e n b u r g ,
G e r m a n y
C a r l - v o n - O s s i e t z k y -
S t r a ß e 9 - 1 1
D - 2 6 1 2 9 O l d e n b u r g |
G e r m a n y
2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 7
Dipta Majumder, Apoorv
Pareek
This report is prepared for coursework (“Energy
Economics”) under the curriculum of Postgraduate
Programme Renewable Energy at the University Of
Oldenburg, Germany.
Impact of Grameen
Bank’s Microcredit
Program on Off-
Grid Rural
Electrification of
Bangladesh
2 | P a g e
Table of Contents 1. Introduction: ................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Decoding the success of “Grameen Bank” in Bangladesh ................................................................. 4
What is microcredit? ........................................................................................................................... 5
Why microfinance is needed? .............................................................................................................. 5
History of microfinance ....................................................................................................................... 6
How does it work? ............................................................................................................................... 7
Interest rate in microcredit and global trend ....................................................................................... 7
Key factors for the success of microcredit program of Grameen Bank: ................................................. 9
3. IDCOL Solar Home System (SHS) program: ....................................................................................... 9
How the SHS program started in Bangladesh ....................................................................................... 9
What is a Solar home system? ........................................................................................................... 11
Business model: ................................................................................................................................. 12
Key success factors: ........................................................................................................................... 13
4. Comparison & analysis ................................................................................................................. 14
Is micro financing the only way for off-grid rural electrification? .................................................. 15
Analysis of impact of Grameen Bank on the IDCOL SHS program: ...................................................... 16
5. Conclusion: ................................................................................................................................... 18
References: .......................................................................................................................................... 19
3 | P a g e
1. Introduction: History of development of microfinance revolves around Dr. Muhammad Yunus, an economist from
Bangladesh and his brainchild the Grameen Bank. Being jointly awarded the Winner of the Nobel
Prize[1] in 2006, Dr. Yunus and the Grameen Bank’s microcredit program has inspired over forty
countries[2] to start similar programs.
Microcredit and Microfinance are often used interchangeably. However, in reality microcredit is
providing small loans to a borrower who lacks the capability to provide collateral to a conventional
bank. On the other hand, microfinance is providing financial services to people who cannot avail
any loan from the banking due to the same reason. Microcredit is one of the services that micro
financing can offer. Irrespective of debate to use the same terminology, they target the same
section of people in the society- those who don’t have the access to the loan; which makes it
difficult for them to change their economic condition.
Grameen Bank started its journey in 1983 as a legislated bank and since then it’s been a success
story. Subsequent to the success of Grameen Bank, a handful of microfinance institutions (MFIs)
have grown in Bangladesh and outside as well. Microfinance institutions have not only been
confined to providing micro credit to those who need it. MFIs have also brought other services e.g.
providing water, education, food, health facilities, and electricity to the poorest section of the
society. Apart from the basic needs, electricity is something that is not easy to have access for the
poor people. Bangladesh is one of those countries with low electrification rate (76%) while most of
the people of the country lives in underdeveloped rural areas (66%) [3]. The rural people could not
have access to electricity due to the limited development of the national grid and the associated
cost. People have no other choice than to lead their daily lives with the use of kerosene lamps.
Micro financing organizations saw the opportunity to provide the electricity service through their
micro financing scheme when small solar photovoltaic (PV) home systems were commercially
available. It was a challenge to bring a new technology to the poor rural people within affordability
limits. Albeit, the initial high cost didn’t make things easier for them. In spite of the challenges, with
the blend of innovative business model and effective use of subsidies from the funding
organizations, Bangladesh has also shown the same amount of success like their microcredit
program. Providing solar home systems (SHSs) at a comparable price to kerosene was no easy task.
SHS program of Bangladesh, led by a government owned financing organization (IDCOL), has
already installed over 4 million SHSs countrywide [4]. It is one of the successful off-grid rural
electrification programs of the world.
MFIs have played an integral part in disseminating that many SHSs to the off-grid people. But does
the long history of Bangladesh with microcredit programs helped the country to succeed in the SHS
program? Do other countries have the same experience? One could argue that the experience in
microcredit program has helped or hasn’t helped the popular off-grid rural electrification program
(SHS program). The objective of this report is to find out the dependency or any correlation
between two programs (microcredit program of Grameen Bank & the IDCOL Solar Home System
program. Discussions will be made on the factors that facilitated the success of both. Experience
4 | P a g e
from the other countries will also be discussed to find out whether this success was replicable or
not. In the end, it would be a goal to find out whether experience in microcredit was necessary for
the success of the SHS program. The novelty of this report is that impacts on the peoples’ lives have
been studied by many; however the impact on the success of another micro financing program
hasn’t been explored. Both of the programs are from the same country which also helps to assume
that many factors e.g. geographical, cultural, and political, remain the same for both.
This report is divided into three sections. The first section explains the microcredit in general and
then elaborate the program details of Grameen Bank to make the readers understand the factors
why this was a huge success. In the next section, focus shifts to the IDCOL solar home system
program of Bangladesh. Explanation on how this program works is crucial to find out the relation
with the Grameen Bank microcredit program. In the third and the last section, a discussion is done
on the common factors which facilitated the successes. Arguments are made on why the success of
one was necessary for the other one.
2. Decoding the success of “Grameen Bank” in Bangladesh
Poverty in general means lack of capability to acquire any material possession. However, the
definition of poverty and where it starts would vary from one country to another. The World Bank
came up with international poverty line of USD 1.90 at 2015 purchasing power parity1 (PPP) [5]. In
2013, 767 million people around the world lived under the poverty threshold or poverty line of USD
1.90. The situation is not to be changed any soon. These people living under the poverty line are
not able to support their family every day and are incapable to avail the basic human needs e.g.
food, clothes and a place to live.
In order to change their situation, these people can’t approach to a financial institute during
adverse or emergency conditions for any financial support. Reasons why the traditional banks
would not provide credit support to them is the risk of defaulting (not repaying). In most of the
cases, they don’t even meet the minimal qualifications for credit due to lack of collateral, lack of
steady employment or lack of income and verifiable credit history. These are the required details
asked and scrutinized by any bank or a financing organization before sanctioning any amount of
loan.
A person, who lacks the abovementioned points, falls under the category of non-bankable.
Generally unemployed, low income individuals, entrepreneurs or farmers are the ones who could
not change their conditions. But the question arises how without the channeling of capital, these
people would escape the vicious cycle of poverty. Some people manage to take a loan from
informal sources such as money lenders, neighbors, relatives, and local traders. These lenders often
have high interest rates & limited resources which doesn’t allow the entrepreneur to earn profit
and mostly results in a debt trap. This is exactly where the microcredit comes in. Necessity of
1 Purchasing power parity- estimate what the exchange rate between two currencies would have to be in order for
the exchange to be at par with the purchasing power of the two countries' currencies.
5 | P a g e
intervention into the informal credit market in rural perspective is only meaningful when the
interest could be kept within check [6].
What is microcredit and microfinance?
Microfinance is a type of banking service that is designed to provide easy financial service access
specifically to these people who fall under the category of non-bankable. Microcredit is one of the
financial services that microfinance can offer. The goal of microfinance is to self-empower low
income people and give them an opportunity to become self-sufficient. Microcredit indicates giving
small loan to people daily, weekly or monthly to sustain their day to day lives. These people then
invest this small amount in money or work to earn and then repay the load with the incurred
interest.
Microcredit plays an important role in fighting the multi-dimensional aspects of poverty by giving
the flexibility to avail necessary commodities in the time of earning or giving them the time to earn
as per their capability or talent to perform any work which can generate money. This will result in
an increase of the household income. By no means, microcredit can be coined as charity, since
most lending organizations give loan with a target to make a profit at the end (including Grameen
Bank). Charity could only build dependency, making poor people incapable of breaking through the
wall of poverty.
Why microfinance is needed?
From basic economics, the importance of microfinance can be understood easily. One would
probably think that for a bank, it would be better to invest in big industries than to small
enterprises to ensure big profit. Surprisingly, principle of diminishing marginal returns to capital
from economics indicates that the banks should invest in small enterprises to gain higher return. In
another way capital should flow from the rich to the poor.
Production function shows concavity in general- which means that with higher investment an
entrepreneur would generate less marginal gain. A clever entrepreneur would thus invest slowly to
get the maximum benefit. The difference in marginal gain is shown below in figure 1. Hence,
economically it makes sense to invest to the poor people than to the rich.
Figure 1: Difference in marginal gain based on capital investment (Source-[6])
6 | P a g e
Certainly, it is not what the global investors are doing. The basic economics is not wrong either. The
reason why it’s not done is because of the uncertainty or risk that the bank would be able to
retrieve their capital and interest out of it. To understand the possibility of investing on poor, we
need to know a little bit of history of microfinance which is elaborated in the next part.
History of microfinance
The idea of microfinance rooted from different places. But the most known one is the story of Dr.
Muhammad Yunus, a Bengali economist and his brainchild the “Grameen Bank”. Dr. Yunus is
known throughout the world as a pioneer of the microcredit concept that uses small loans given at
high-yet affordable interest rates to transform the lives of impoverished people.
Lending small loans to poor people without any collateral has its own risks. Fortunately, Dr.
Muhammad Yunus believed in his idea. A simple yet powerful idea of providing extremely poor
people living in poverty with small loans so they can start and operate a business (mostly women
so they can start, operate a business like rice husking and bamboo weaving) and thus later move
towards the direction of self sufficiency and become financially independent. He figured it out
correctly. Apart from charging higher interest rates to minimize the risks, he targeted community
driven -group based lending and encouraged women to borrow money, who are he thought would
be less likely to default on their loans than men. The idea worked and Grameen Bank was the first
bank to execute the idea of microcredit successfully. No wonder they call themselves “Bank for the
poor”.
Dr. Yunus’s model worked in his social experiment and the repayment rate was also healthy.
Realizing that he could only go so far with his own resources, Dr. Yunus convinced the Bangladesh
Bank, the central bank of Bangladesh, to help him set up a special branch that catered to the poor
called Grameen Bank which literally means “village bank”. The approach has inspired other
countries as well to give microcredit to the poor. Global coverage of people under microcredit is
shown below in Table 1.
Table 1: Growth of microfinance coverage from Microcredit Summit Campaign (Source: [6])
What remains as one of the innovative approaches from the Grameen Bank is the group lending
policy. Different credit lending policies or mechanisms are practiced e.g. individual, intermediary,
group, community, cooperative, credit union etc. Grameen bank calls their model as ‘Grameen
Model’ which is explained in the following part.
7 | P a g e
How does it work?
In general, microcredit works on the principle of small multiple loans where a person is allowed to
take a small loan so he can start the business. This initial capital can be used by the person to
purchase the tools before starting the business. Once the person is able to repay the loan
successfully and make profit out of his business plan, he is allowed to take another bigger loan
which can be used to increase the business. This cycle keeps on continuing until the person comes
out of the poverty and become self sustainable.
Figure 2: Escaping the cycle of poverty using microcredit (Source- [7])
The Grameen model is a bit different from the general model or individual model. Grameen Bank
usually sets up a unit in a potential business location with field manager and few workers. This is
called a bank unit and covers 15 to 22 villages. A small group of five persons is formed. In the
beginning, only two persons are given a loan for fifty weeks. Other three persons will not be eligible
for borrowing loan if the first two persons have not repaid the principal amount with interest. Peer
pressure from the group will ensure that the borrowers don’t default. This reduces the
requirement for any type of collateral to give a loan. On the other hand, it helps the people in the
group to start their own business, making profit and savings, repayment of loan and then taking a
bigger loan to repeat the same cycle. A common misconception of high interest rate is there
against micro-financing in Bangladesh. We can have a look on the global trend in microcredit
interest rate to find out where Bangladesh stands.
Global trend in interest rate in microcredit
Interest rates on microloans can be interpreted in two different ways based on the availability of
data. The ways are Annual Percentage Rate (APR) and interest yield [8]. APR takes the amount and
time of all the cash flows related to the loan, including fees or charges or deposits required by the
lenders. APR basically indicates the effective cost of a loan for a borrower which can be different
from the stated interest rate in a loan contract. APR needs good data and it takes time to compute.
On the other hand, a quick way could be ‘interest yield’. Interest yield in different parts of the
world are reported from a study by Rosenberg et al. (2011).
8 | P a g e
Figure 3: MFI interest yield distribution, 2011 (Source- [8])
In case of unavailability of the required data, interest yield can be calculated taking into account
all the income from the loan as the percentage of lender’s annual average gross loan portfolio. It
is meaningful indicator from the point of view of a lender that what the borrowers are paying. In
the figure above, the interest rate shown is mean interest rates with variations possible.
Interestingly, the lowest interest yield is in South Asia with a mean of 27%. This can be
attributed to the low stuff cost in countries like Bangladesh. Grameen Bank on average is
charging 20% interest rate to their customers. However, this is the interest rate on contract, not
the interest yield or APR.
A recent trend in the global interest yield shows the interest rate has stopped dropping in recent
times. This is quite visible from the figure below. Until 2007, there was a clear indication of the
gradual decrease of the interest rate with the increase in the market. There was a sudden rise in
2008 to tackle the world inflation. However, then onwards, it hasn’t dropped that much.
Figure 4: Global trends in interest yield in microcredit market
9 | P a g e
This is quite interesting because with an increase in competition in the market and in cases few
markets are saturated, one would assume that the gradual decrease in the rates to continue.
This can be linked to the almost constant operational (staff and administrative) cost.
Key factors for the success of microcredit program of Grameen Bank:
• Community driven approach- Grameen Bank used an innovative model to provide
loans. Group lending to groups of five persons helped to minimize risks of defaulting
with peer pressure from other group members. In addition, branch manager and a team
of Grameen Bank hold a meeting with all the groups to help them build their capability
to earn money through a business or job. This community driven approach has helped
Grameen Bank to succeed.
• Keeping loan and interest within an affordable limit- Grameen Bank has been a
profitable venture. It never started with a goal to do charity. Despite being a profit
oriented organization, Grameen Bank had to understand the affordability of the
targeted customers. Loans were given based on the capacity of a customer (Capacity
being one of three C’s of microcredit- others are character and capital [9]).
• Getting to know the customer- As three C’s of microcredit says, character of the
customer is crucial to get back your money. Grameen Bank just had to understand the
customers. To do that, Grameen Bank opened many branches across the country to go
near to people and get to know them before lending money. This chain of branch offices
has built a strong network within the lenders and the borrowers.
3. IDCOL Solar Home System (SHS) program:
How the SHS program started in Bangladesh
Infrastructure Development Company Limited (IDCOL) is a government owned financing
organization which was established to connect the bridge between public and private partners.
IDCOL is the largest financier in the private sector of Bangladesh. However, IDCOL is well known
for the large scale dissemination of renewable energy technologies. The flagship program for
IDCOL has been its Solar Home System (SHS) program. As of now, over 4 million Solar Home
Systems have been installed across Bangladesh. IDCOL has been implementing this program by
its 65 participating organizations (POs) - mostly MFIs. MFIs and private companies are selling the
systems based on microfinance along with installing, distributing and maintenance. This
program has been aided by international funding partners e.g. the World Bank, ADB, GIZ, JICA,
USAID etc. However, the subsidy amount has been decreased gradually. This program started in
the year 2003 and since then has been achieving the installation target way before the timeline.
IDCOL SHS program is considered as one of the most successful renewable energy programs in
the world. This program has benefitted nearly 10% population of Bangladesh-living under the
darkness before. Clean electricity of around 150 Mega Watt (MW) is being generated through
10 | P a g e
this program. A target of 6 million SHSs has been set by IDCOL to be achieved within 2018.
Bangladesh leads in terms of installation in the global scale, which is also evident from the
recent Global Status Report [10] shown in Figure 5 and year wise growth shown in Figure 6.
Figure 5: Installation of solar home systems in different countries (2015) Source- [10].
Due to the high initial cost of SHS, a household or shop can avail the system with a micro
financing facility. They are able to repay the loan in a monthly installment. Usually, the loan is
repaid in 36 installments within 3 years. Households then become the system owners for the
rest of its lifetime. They can also take the servicing facilities after the loan repayment period
with a small charge. Standard warranty is also provided by the lending organizations.
Figure 6: Rapid growth of IDCOL Solar Home System (Source: [11])
Participating organizations (POs) have an average loan collection rate of 96% [11] which is
similar to the repayment rate for the Grameen Bank program(97%) [12] . Most of the POs have
been able to sustain the collection rate over the years.
With a share of approximately 42% [11], Grameen Shakti is the SHS market leader. Grameen
Shakti is a member of Grameen organizations which also includes Grameen Bank. The
11 | P a g e
microcredit network and resource base of Grameen Bank have helped Grameen Shakti to
increase their market. Percentage of the dominant POs are given below.
Figure 7: Share of POs until January 2015 (Source-[11])
Notably, the major shareholders are all MFIs e.g. Grameen Shakti, RSF, HFSKS, BGEF, RDF, BRAC
etc. Then again, what service exactly is given to the customers by this program? To understand
so, let’s start by explaining what a solar home system is.
What is a Solar home system?
A SHS consists of a small solar PV panel, charge controller, battery and connecting cables to provide
3-5 hours electricity to lighting loads and small appliances. Usually, a household uses LED lights
available now for cooking and education. In some cases, radio and TV are also used from the PV
system. Solar home system in Bangladesh is a 12V DC system which means the appliances used are
specialized, different from grid connected appliances. Total number of suppliers working in the
solar industry is over 200 in Bangladesh. A very competitive market in the equipment section also
ensures that the customer has a choice in selecting components.
Figure 8: A Solar Home System with appliances (Source: [11])
12 | P a g e
Most costly component of the system is the solar panel and the battery. Initially, the panel used to
cost a lot. However, with the increasing solar industry, the cost per watt peak has gone down
drastically. Year wise drop in the cost of solar panels are shown below in Figure 9.
Figure 9: PV panel price per watt peak from 1977-2013 (Source:[11])
Business model:
It is argued that the IDCOL SHS program has been successful mostly due to its business model
along with other factors. IDCOL almost plays a parenting role in guiding its borrowers on running
the business model successfully and reaching sustainability. Specific defined responsibilities,
incentives and regular interaction between IDCOL and POs have made this model so successful
which could not be replicated by many other countries.
IDCOL chose their POs based on certain criteria like having experience in working with rural
community. In addition, IDCOL also standardizes the equipment selection and installation
procedure. A strong monitoring team is also there to check the quality of the installation and
after sales service. The whole process is shown pictorially below.
Figure 10: Business model of IDCOL SHS program (Source- [13])
13 | P a g e
IDCOL basically takes soft term loan (3% interest rate) from the donors and give the long term loan
to POs for 5 to 7 years at 6 to 9% interest rate per year with reduced balance method (interest on
the outstanding loan only). POs then provide the system to the households at 8-15% interest rate
(with 10% down payment) to be paid within one to three years. POs can run the business
sustainably due to the low interest rate and longer repayment period.
POs are selected by an independent committee to keep transparency. A committee with selected
members from all POs is formed, known as “Operations Committee”. An operations committee
meeting is held monthly to discuss the challenges and solutions. On the other hand, an
independent technical standards committee works on standardizing equipment and selects
suppliers based on their quality of product, if matched with the standard. Selected suppliers are
only able to provide the equipment necessary for the system. POs provide the service and product
warranty to the customers whereas the back to back warranty is provided to the POs by the
suppliers and manufacturers. A household can choose between the POs and take the solution
which seems more economically attractive to them. Nevertheless, competition in the market has
kept the system cost within check.
Key success factors:
• Sustainable business model- One of the key reasons for the success of the SHS program is the
sustainable business model set by IDCOL. The model ensures quality checking and necessary
monitoring. In addition, the model allowed the phasing out of the subsidies [11] for the larger
systems. Only USD 20 subsidy is now available for the small systems (below 30 Watt peak) [14].
Gradual decrease in price of solar panel has also helped in this case.
• Local manufacturers- Most of the components of the SHS are manufactured locally. Except for
solar panels, other components are basically from Bangladesh. Growth of local industry has
helped to keep the cost of the system within the affordability limit of the poor people. Notably,
few PV panel manufacturing companies are also available in Bangladesh. However, the bulk
manufacturing by countries like China has made it difficult for local manufacturers to sustain
their business.
• Standard products- A standard has been set by the technical committee which the suppliers and
manufacturers have to comply with. If the compliance has not been done, IDCOL will not
refinance for the installed systems to the POs until quality product has been supplied. This
mechanism has helped to keep minimum quality of service provided to the customers. It is
noticed often that the customers don’t want to pay if the system is not working properly.
• Experience of micro finance- Organizations like Grameen Shakti has the history with micro
finance. Grameen Bank (Grameen Shakti is from the same foundation as Grameen Bank) has
been a prominent institution in this field. This resource base has helped Grameen Shakti to
perform very well in this sector [13]. The infrastructure and tested strategies can help to provide
better services to the community.
• Innovative strategies-Many organizations provided extra benefit for the customers who were
repaying properly. A strong after sales service team goes to the household during the collection
to check if the system if working properly or not. Recently, the mobile money has also come into
14 | P a g e
play. Customers can now give the payment from their mobile phone. It can be noted here the
interest rates offered to the customers in SHS program are comparatively lower than (20% for
micro credit) average microcredit interest rate due to the heavy competition in the market.
4. Comparison & analysis
One can argue that there is no valid comparison to find out similarity and dissimilarity between
the mentioned two programs, since they are essentially very different from each other.
However, both are microfinance based programs set in the same country. On that note, a line of
valid comparison can be drawn between them to find out any correlation which facilitated the
success in one way or the other. Key differences and similarities are discussed below to have a
better view on this.
a) The main feature in the case of Grameen Bank is that poor people are getting the tool to
access things that they don’t have right now. On the other hand, in SHS program they get
access to a service which might help their economic condition and better their standard of
life. In another words, they get access to a particular service (electricity or lighting) straight
away without the need to use any tool (e.g. money) to avail the service.
b) Another difference is that in the SHS program, there is no such thing as group lending like in
Grameen Bank program. One of the key innovations in microcredit of Grameen Bank is the
group lending which works like a guarantor or a collateral for the borrower. However, this is
not possible for the SHS. In this sense, the collection becomes difficult for the lender, since
they in most cases cannot do anything if the customer defaults. They may ask to take the
system off in case of defaulting. In order to improve the collection from the defaulters, SHS
program in Bangladesh started an integrated approach to connect the local administration
and law enforcement agencies into the scenario to improve collection. On the technological
front, automated system with the facility of system disconnection has been developed to
prevent lag in the collection rate.
c) Although the SHS program does not have the community interaction or group lending of
sorts, the customer get to choose different packages according to his/her capability to
repay. Obviously a customer will take a system according to the demand of the family
(mostly lighting loads). However, in many cases adjustment of the usage of SHS is also done
by the user. Hence, a customer has the freedom to choose accordingly. Another thing is the
option of returning the system. Based on the financial condition of the family, if customer
doesn’t want to continue, he can resell the whole system back- allowing him/her to
discontinue the loan. On the other hand, in Grameen Bank program, the customers really
cannot choose the loan on his/her own because he/she will have to depend on other group
members as well.
d) Another business model has developed recently to share electricity within a community
which is a rather community driven approach. In this case, if a customer not having the
capability to afford a whole SHS, he/she can buy only a controlling device to share the
15 | P a g e
excess electricity from the neighbors. This business model developed by a German-
Bangladesh venture has also started to gain momentum [15]. This community driven
approach is the first in SHS program, whereas the Grameen Bank program has always been
community driven, rather than individualistic.
e) A prominent difference between the two markets is that the market for SHS may shrink due
to the rapid extension of the national grid. Hence, there is a possibility that the market will
saturate at sometime. On the other hand, people may need money even if they are coming
over the poverty line to improve the quality of life. Hence, the microcredit market will not
probably shrink rather expand to the benefit of the MFIs. On another hand, with increase in
the standard of living, people will shift to better quality of electricity compared to SHS. POs
working in the SHS program will have to then shift the paradigm to provide other useful
services.
f) As far as the local community is concerned; the culture of micro credit system has been
popular among the rural people from the program of Grameen Bank. Grameen Bank also
reported high repayment rate of 97% since 1979 [12]. High repayment rate was possible due
to the fact that the collection procedure was community driven. Concept of making groups
and pressuring individual from the group to repay has done the tricks for Grameen Bank. In
addition, programs to facilitate rural community to help themselves out of poverty have also
set up the culture of duly payment of loans.
g) Although the culture of micro credit facilities was set up by Grameen Bank way earlier than
solar home system, it was not enough for the success of the solar home system program. A
supply chain has to be established with capable after-sales service team to serve the
borrowers. If the service could not be provided at an affordable price (compared to the
kerosene), the success wasn’t Possible. Notably, low interest loan facilities and foreign aids
were available in case of the solar home system program due to the high initial investment
required in SHS.
h) SHS program market has another unique challenge. SHS isn’t the only way to give electricity.
Even if you take solar to give electricity, microfinance isn’t the only way out. Let’s dig into
the other options available.
Is micro financing the only way for SHS program?
Different other models for off-grid rural electrification are available except micro financing.
All the other models have their own pros and cons. Most popular are cash sales. In this
method, small SHS are sold on cash. China, Kenya, Zimbabwe are where the cash sales are
popular. One limitation of cash sales method is that it is only applicable for very small SHS.
Lighting kits are basically sold in this way with a small PV panel and small battery. The World
Bank Group’s Lighting Africa program is based on this mechanism with some subsidies.
However, cash sales also lead to low quality product since it is generally difficult to avail
after-sales service. In Kiribati, higher failure rates in case of cash sales were reported [16].
16 | P a g e
Another common mechanism is fee-for-service. In this way, customers pay for the service,
not for the whole solar home system. Unlike microfinance, service provider owns the
system. In this way, cost reduction is possible for economies of scale. Despite the pros, a
study in Namibia showed that 95% would prefer a credit facility [16]. The main reason is
people are generally interested in ownership of the product.
However, cash sales and fee-for-service model hasn’t been able to attract many customers
whereas the microcredit facilities gave customers flexibility to choose. Despite not being the
only way for off-grid market, micro financing is the most popular way nevertheless.
Analysis of impact of Grameen Bank on the IDCOL SHS program:
In order to assess impact of their work, Grameen bank looks over ten indicators to decide
whether their customers have been over the poverty line or not. The indicators are given below:
• The family lives in a house worth at least BDT 25,000 (about USD 313 at current exchange
rates2) or a house with a tin roof, and each member of the family is able to sleep on a
bed instead of the floor.
• Family members drink pure water of arsenic free tube-wells, boiled water or purified
water.
• All children in the family over six years of age are all going to school or have
finished primary school.
• The minimum weekly loan installment of the borrower is BDT 200 (USD 2.5 or more)
• The family uses a sanitary latrine.
• Family members have adequate clothing for everyday use, warm clothing for winter
and mosquito nets to protect themselves from mosquitoes.
• The family has sources of additional income, such as a vegetable garden, fruit-bearing
trees, etc., so that they are able to fall back on these sources of income when they
need additional money.
• The borrower maintains an average annual balance of Tk. 5,000 (about USD 63) in his/her
savings accounts.
• No member of the family goes hungry any time of the year.
• The family can take care of its health. If any member of the family falls ill, the family
can afford to take all necessary steps to seek adequate healthcare.
Notably, to indicate the eradication of poverty, no indicator deals with the access to electricity.
However, access to electricity would directly or indirectly impact indicators like savings,
additional income, and primary school education of children.
In a study on the impact of social status of Grameen Bank borrowers [17] it was found that ,
12.5% of the customers have access to electricity before availing loan from Grameen Bank and it
2 1 USD= 79.95 on 10 February, 2017
17 | P a g e
rose to 65% after taking loan from the bank. This impact study was done on changing livelihood
status of the rural women in Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. If not by the same percentage
elsewhere, access to electricity rate is bound to increase when people are coming out of
poverty.
To understand the impact, affordability of a rural household with microcredit history to avail a
Solar Home System through micro financing is checked. Average household size in Bangladesh is
4.5 [18]. For the sake of analysis, we assume that number of members in a rural household is 5.
For five persons, a 20 watt peak solar home system would be sufficient to provide 4 hours of
lighting of three LED bulbs. Let’s have a look into the system cost of 20 watt peak SHS form
IDCOL program from the Table below:
Table 2: Typical price information of a 20 watt peak SHS of IDCOL program (Source: [14])
It can be noted here that the potential customer has to pay USD 17 as down payment and a
monthly installment of USD 5.4. On the other hand, we assume that the household is out of
poverty marginally (USD 2/day/person), which makes monthly use of money in the family to be
USD 300. On the other hand, the Grameen Bank customers will have savings of USD 63 as well. A
household using more than USD 300 for daily life is highly likely to be able to give USD 5.4 every
month and a down payment of USD 17 for a SHS. Clearly, a Grameen bank member who has
come out of poverty could afford a solar home system easily.
Grameen Bank claims that around 46% [19] of the borrowers have already crossed the poverty
line in 2004. Up to 2014, Grameen Bank had 8,640,225 members [20]; out of them nearly
3,974,503 are over the poverty line if the same rate is applied. Considering each person from a
single household could possibly mean that nearly the same amount of households got out of the
poverty. Let’s also have a look on the year wise installation of Solar Home System of IDCOL
program over the years in the figure below:
18 | P a g e
Figure 11: Installation status of SHS until March, 2014. (Source- [14])
Over four million SHSs have been installed till date whereas nearly the same (could be more)
amount of people have come out of poverty as well. It would not be wise to draw a conclusion
that the people coming of the poverty have a solar home system or those who have solar home
system are coming out of poverty. But a clear relationship is there, people were coming out of
poverty and could afford better facilities e.g. electricity from solar.
From the discussion and the analysis, it could be easily said that there is a strong relationship
between both the programs in two ways. Firstly, organizations working on the SHS program had
the experience of micro credit beforehand. Grameen Shakti, the market leader in SHS is a sister
concern of the Grameen Bank, which also indicates that the knowledge was a key factor in
succeeding in SHS program. Secondly, people were coming out of poverty through the micro
credit program of Grameen Bank (other organizations like BRAC are also functioning, but not to
the scale of Grameen Bank). People who have came out of the poverty cycle, now could afford
facilities like SHS at an affordable price.
5. Conclusion: To sum up things, both the Grameen Bank microcredit program and the IDCOL solar home
system have been successful due to many factors. But it is arguable if the IDCOL solar home
system would have been as successful as it is without the previous success of microcredit. The
microcredit program success has in fact built the path for the SHS program to succeed. Without
microcredit experience, it would have suffered like other SHS programs have suffered in the
past. It cannot be said that, the micro credit program was the only factor for the success of the
SHS program, but definitely one of the key factors.
A comparison line was tried to be drawn between both the programs, despite being completely
different in the core. However, the programs are built on microfinance and targeted to the same
group of people. Usually under this scenario, success of one would benefit the other. It was also
19 | P a g e
discussed that the market for a particular service is likely to saturate or shift to a better service
whereas people would always need credit to increase their business or income. It is also possible
that the market of SHS would go through a paradigm shift in future. Competition on the SHS
program although is higher than micro credit market which reflected in the interest rate
imposed in SHS are lower compared to microcredit market. Additionally, micro credit program
of Grameen Bank has more community driven approach than SHS program. SHS program is
lately shifting towards more in the community driven way after facing some challenges in
collecting monthly repayments.
From an analytical point of view, it was also found out that a family of five members who have
at least one Grameen Bank member can easily afford a 20 watt peak SHS. A 20 watt peak SHS
would suffice the daily electricity demand of a small rural family. Down payment of USD 17 and
monthly installment of USD 5.4 should not be difficult for a family repaying monthly loan of USD
10 for the microcredit program. The household is over the poverty line which means they are
using more than USD 300 for livelihood. From a generalized point of view and based on
assumptions, it was found out that the number of Grameen Bank members who got out of
poverty is comparable to the SHS installations across the country.
In a nutshell, the success of Grameen Bank paved the way for the IDCOL SHS program. Along
with other positive factors, particularly two i.e. poverty eradication from micro credit and
experience of working in rural community helped the IDCOL SHS program to reach the place
where it is today.
References:
[1] Muhammad Yunus n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Yunus (accessed
February 9, 2017).
[2] Grameen Bank n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grameen_Bank (accessed February 9,
2017).
[3] Bangladesh Energy Situation n.d.
https://energypedia.info/wiki/Bangladesh_Energy_Situation (accessed February 9, 2017).
[4] Solar Home System Program n.d. http://idcol.org/home/solar (accessed February 9, 2017).
[5] Poverty Threshold n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_threshold (accessed
February 9, 2017).
[6] Aghion BA de, Morduch J. The Economics of Microfinance. The MIT Press, London, England;
2005.
[7] Microcredit movement n.d. https://christinehwang.wordpress.com/tag/microcredit-
movement/ (accessed February 10, 2017).
[8] Rosenberg R, Gaul S, Ford W, Tomilova O. Microcredit Interest Rates and Their
20 | P a g e
Determinants. 2013.
[9] Three C’s of Credit n.d. http://www.grameen.com/three-cs-of-credit/ (accessed February
10, 2017).
[10] Renewable 2016-Global Status Report. 2016.
[11] Marro P, Bertsch N. Making Renewable Energy a Success in Bangladesh: Getting the Business
Model Right. 2015.
[12] Rouf KA. Eradication of poverty through community economic development using micro
financing: Lessons learned from Grameen Bank Bangladesh. Int J Res Stud Manag 2016;5.
doi:10.5861/ijrsm.2016.1403.
[13] Bhandari J. Microfinance for the Solar Home System Program in Bangladesh. 2014.
[14] Islam SMM. IDCOL Solar Home System Program n.d.
https://www.esmap.org/sites/esmap.org/files/ESMAP_SAR_EAP_Renewable_Energy_Resou
rce_Mapping_Islam.pdf (accessed February 10, 2017).
[15] ME SOLSHARE: PEER-TO-PEER SMART VILLAGE GRIDS | BANGLADESH n.d.
http://unfccc.int/secretariat/momentum_for_change/items/9940.php (accessed February
10, 2017).
[16] F.D.J. Nieuwenhout, A. van Dijk, V.A.P. van Dijk, D. Hirsch, P.E. Lasschuit G van R, H. Arriaza,
M. Hankins, B.D. Sharma HW. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF SOLAR HOME SYSTEMS.
2000. doi:ECN-C--00-089.
[17] Ahmed F, Begum CS, Idris NAH, Ara R. Impact of Grameen Bank Microcrdit Programme on
Changing Livelihood Status of the Rural Women in Panchagarh District of Bangladesh. Am J
Appl Sci 2011;8.
[18] Bangladesh Average Household Size n.d.
http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=692cee7e5a5e47dd86531ab0c6a00cff
(accessed February 10, 2017).
[19] Mainsah E, Heuer SR, Kalra A, Zhang Q. Taking Capitalism to the Poor. 2004.
[20] Annual Report. 2014.