+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Implementation and execution of civilian RDCR...

Implementation and execution of civilian RDCR...

Date post: 28-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: trinhthien
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
63
Implementation and execution of civilian RDCR programs – Minnesota RDCR Donald H Jenkins, MD FACS Associate Professor of Surgery and Director of Trauma Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester MN June 2013
Transcript

Implementation and execution of civilian RDCR

programs – Minnesota RDCR

Donald H Jenkins, MD FACS Associate Professor of Surgery and Director of Trauma

Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester MN

June 2013

Remote Damage Control: Civilian Experience in

the Pre-Hospital Setting

No Disclosures

Objectives

•  Indications for treatment with blood products for traumatic hemorrhagic shock in the pre-hospital setting

•  Monitoring devices used for coagulopathy and shock •  Therapeutics utilized in these patients for pre-hospital

treatment of casualties •  Evacuations of long durations compared to rapid ones •  Methods of implementation to improve rapid

incorporation of recently initiated changes in practice

Remote Damage Control Resusc

•  Austere/rural environment patients •  Modified transfusion strategy •  Different than those with scene/pre-hospital time < 30

minutes •  Limited resources available •  Lack of plasma availability •  40% of the population, 60% of the trauma mortality

•  Current treatment options for uncontrolled hemorrhage in this environment are very limited

•  >75% of combat fatalities occur in the field

Hartford Consensus February 2013

•  Leaders in law enforcement, EMS, military and the American College of Surgeons

•  Recommendations for civilian organizations to improve survival during active shooter scenarios

•  Stress “the importance of early and definitive hemorrhage control to maximize survival in the victims….”

Hartford Consensus THREAT •  T - Threat suppression •  H - Hemorrhage Control •  RE - Rapid Extraction to safety, •  A - Assessment by medical providers •  T - Transport to definitive care

Coagulopathy on Presentation

•  An initial INR ≥ 1.5 reliably predicts those military casualties who will require MT.

•  Pts who have a significant injury present with a coagulopathy.

•  Severity of injury and mortality is linearly associated with the degree of the initial coagulopathy.

- Schreiber MA, Perkins JP, Kiraly L, Underwood SJ, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Early Predictors of Massive Transfusion in Combat Casualties. Submitted, J Trauma. - Brohi K, et al. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2003.

Background

MacLeod JBA et al. Early Coagulopathy Predicts

Mortality in Trauma J Trauma 2003

Brohi K et al. Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy

J Trauma 2003

By the time of arrival at the ED, 28% (2,994 of 10,790) of trauma patients had a detectable coagulopathy that was

associated with poor outcome

Background

de Biasi et al. Early Coagulopathy Predicts Mortality in Trauma

Transfusion (Epub, Accepted 2010)

Mortality was associated with worse Plasma Deficit &

The efficacy of the Plasma Repletion occurs within hours

DoD Learned About Thawed Plasma

•  Thawed plasma is FFP that is kept for up to 5 days at 4°C •  This product should be present upon arrival of the casualty in

the ED •  should be used as a primary resuscitative fluid started in the ED

•  This approach not only addresses the metabolic abnormality of shock, but initiates reversal of the coagulopathy present in the ED.

•  Thawed plasma is used in theater •  The DoD Level 1 trauma center uses this product

•  Decreases waste by 60-70%

- Malone DL, Hess JR, Fingerhut A. Comparison of practices around the globe and suggestion for a massive transfusion protocol. J Trauma, 2006. - Armand R, Hess JR. Treating coagulopathy in trauma patients. Transfus Med Rev 2003.

Early Use of Blood in the Pre-hospital Setting

•  Mayo Clinic Experience •  1993-96 retrospective review •  Criteria: Hgb<10, shock, hypotension after

resuscitation •  ~2100 helicopter flights, 94 patients received

PRBC’s (4%, 91% interfacility transfer) •  48% trauma patients, 25% GI bleed, 38% AAA •  Hgb increased from 8.9 to 10.2 after 2 PRBC •  No transfusion reactions or complications •  Average 12 u PRBC after admision •  Age of RBC is < 14 days

Air Med J 1998 Zietlow and Berns

Age of Blood and Procoagulant Microparticles

•  Historically, PCMP increases with age of blood

•  52 trauma patients vs 22 volunteers •  Higher PCMP with injury; no difference

between transfused (n=19)/not transfused •  24 hour PCMP decreased with transfusion

•  No decrease if no transfusion •  Difference widened with increasing transfusion

Spinella Crit Care 2009 Jy Transfusion 2011 Rubin Transfusion 2010-12

Catchment Area

Rationale Coagulopathy & the “Golden

Hour”

•  Trauma Induced Coagulopathy (TIC) predicts mortality

•  Plasma and RBC resuscitation should occur early in the hemorrhagic / coagulopathic pt

•  Catchment area / Rural location provides geographic obstacles

•  Regional plasma deficiency

Protocol – ED Phase •  Thawed Plasma Program •  Developed in Feb 2008 with input from:

- Blood Bank Team - Transfusion Medicine - Medical Transport - Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery

•  Initial 9 months were restricted to in-hospital Emergency Department use

•  Medical and Surgical emergencies - Safety concerns - Utilization of resources

•  Product immediately available in the Trauma Resuscitation Area: - 4 units thawed plasma (A+) - 4 units PRBCs (0 negative)

•  Order of transfusion for trauma patients was: •  2 units PRBC •  2 units thawed Plasma •  2 units PRBC •  2 units thawed Plasma

Protocol – Helicopter Phase

pRBC + Plasma 1.  Hypotension (single reading

of systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg)

2.  Tachycardia (single reading of heart rate ≥ 120)

3.  Penetrating mechanism 4.  Point of care lactate ≥ 5.0

mg/dl 5.  Point of care INR ≥ 1.5

Indications for PRBC and Plasma administration in adult trauma patients

Plasma Alone 1.  Point of care INR ≥ 1.5 2.  Stable Hemodynamics

Waste Prevention Division of Transfusion Medicine monitors

usage

- Thawed plasma is removed from the satellite blood refrigerator on Day #3 and sent to the Operating Theater for immediate use.

Mayo Helicopter Transfusion Criteria

RESULTS

•  5 for hemorrhage •  3 required massive transfusion (> 10 units/24 hours)

•  5 pts transfused for history of trauma and coumadin use

•  All 4 deaths were in this group

•  All pts entered into protocol required ongoing blood product transfusion after arrival to the hospital.

10 TRAUMA PATIENTS TRANSFUSED IN FLIGHT 2/2009 – 9/2010

Trauma Patients (n=10)

Age (years) Male ISS

LOS (days) Mortality

71.5 [30-75.3] 8/10

25.5 [16.8-29.3] 4.5 [1.8-24.8]

4/10

Admission Laboratory Values Coumadin 5/10 (50%) Lactate 2.8 [1.7-5.7] Base -4.1 [-12.5- -0.5] PLT 149 [114-180] PTT 30 [28-42] HgB 10.8 [10.1-13.5] Post-Flight INR 1.6 [1.3-2.8] Pre-Flight INR 2.7 [1.6 – 4.0]

Feasibility

•  Excellent utilization •  No discarded units of plasma to date

•  No transfusion reactions documented to date; use of product parallels massive transfusion in the standard setting

Protocol Evolution

•  During the study period, total of 771 flights •  Only two pts received all 4 units of PRBC

during transport •  Product Order and Ratio

•  2009: 2 PRBC, 2 Plasma, 2 PRBC •  2010: 2 Plasma, 2 PRBC, 2 PRBC •  2011: 3 Plasma, 3 PRBC

Hemostatic Resuscitation in Our Trauma Center

•  Pre-hospital plasma and POC testing •  INR/Lactate pre-hospital

•  Early Diagnosis in ED – StO2/i-Stat •  1:1 ratio (thawed plasma to RBC)

•  Plasma-first transfusion sequence •  ED use of PCC?

•  Frequent TEG and early platelet use •  Minimal crystalloid •  Repeated doses of PCC and/or transfusion

in OR and ICU as required by TEG •  Young red cells (<14 days)

Ratios / Plasma Balance PTP (n=9) Control (n=50) p

En Route P:RBC 1.3 : 1.0 N/A <0.001 30 min P:RBC 1.3 : 1.0 0.14 : 1.0 <0.001 6 hr P:RBC 1.0 : 1.0 0.42 : 1.0 <0.001 24 hr P:RBC 1.0 : 1.0 0.45 : 1.0 <0.001 En Route Plasma Deficit - 0.4 - 1.0 0.32 30 min Plasma Deficit - 1.2 - 2.0 0.37 6 hr Plasma Deficit - 1.7 - 5.3 0.06 24 hr Plasma Deficit - 1.0 - 5.7 0.04

Time & the ‘Geographic Plasma

Deficit’

PTP (n=9) Control (n=50) p Facility Transfer 100% 54% 0.002 Transport à Trauma Ctr (min) 40 39 0.78 Injury à First Plasma (min) 194 231 0.58 Trauma Ctr arrivalàPlasma (min) - 34 97 0.013

•  ABO-identical preferred •  Universal plasma donor

•  Group AB •  Lacks anti-A/anti-B •  Pan-ABO compatible •  Rarest blood group

Group A Plasma Transfusion Introduction

Inaba K et al. Arch Surg 2010

Group A Plasma Transfusion Group AB supply

•  Recent safety data •  ABO incompatible platelets

•  1 – 2 plasma units

•  1 in 9000 hemolysis

•  Group O

•  Immunosuppression

Isaak EJ et al. Immunohematology 2011 Josephson CD et al. Transfus Apher Sci 2010

•  10,206 patients over study period •  Trauma patient •  July 2008 – June 2012 •  ≥ 1 unit emergency release plasma (group A

plasma) •  258 emergency release plasma (2.5%)

•  4 died prior to blood grouping

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

•  254 patients •  35 ABO Incompatible (14%)

•  25 group B •  10 group AB

•  219 ABO Compatible (86%) •  116 group A •  103 group O

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

Feature ABO Incompatible n = 35 ABO compatible

n = 219 P

Age (years) 56 (39-79) 59 (32-79) 0.944 Male sex 63% 63% 0.973 ISS 25 (16-37) 22 (12-30) 0.199 TRISS 0.86 (0.26-0.97) 0.93 (0.34-0.97) 0.880 Scene transfer 34% 38% 0.710 Time from injury to trauma

bay admission (mins) 145 (54-185) 172 (92-230) 0.214 Time in trauma bay (mins) 24 (20-35) 26.5 (20-36) 0.883 Time at referring hospital 119 (96-144) 121 (70-172) 0.920

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

ABO Incompatible n = 35 ABO compatible

N = 219 P

Ventilator days 6 (2-12) 3 (2-8) 0.070 ICU LOS (days) 4 (1-11) 3 (1-7) 0.155 Hospital LOS (days) 9 (3-24) 7 (3-17) 0.146 Complications 43% 35% 0.449

ALI 3.7% 2.5% 0.542 Possible TRALI 2.9% 3.0% 0.362

ARDS 2.9% 1.8% 0.527 Pneumonia 17% 9% 0.144

DVT 2.9% 4.1% 1.00 PE 5.8% 7.3% 1.00

Acute renal failure 0% 1.8% 0.420 Sepsis 0% 0.5% 0.689

Mortality 20% 22% 0.798

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

ABO Incompatible n = 35

ABO compatible N = 219

P

Ventilator days 6 (2-12) 3 (2-8) 0.070 ICU LOS (days) 4 (1-11) 3 (1-7) 0.155 Hospital LOS (days) 9 (3-24) 7 (3-17) 0.146 Complications 43% 35% 0.449

ALI 3.7% 2.5% 0.542 Possible TRALI 2.9% 3.0% 0.362

ARDS 2.9% 1.8% 0.527 Pneumonia 17% 9% 0.144

DVT 2.9% 4.1% 1.00 PE 5.8% 7.3% 1.00

Acute renal failure 0% 1.8% 0.420 Sepsis 0% 0.5% 0.689

Mortality 20% 22% 0.798

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

ABO Incompatible n = 35

ABO compatible N = 219 P

Ventilator days 6 (2-12) 3 (2-8) 0.070 ICU LOS (days) 4 (1-11) 3 (1-7) 0.155 Hospital LOS (days) 9 (3-24) 7 (3-17) 0.146 Complications 43% 35% 0.449

ALI 3.7% 2.5% 0.542 Possible TRALI 2.9% 3.0% 0.362

ARDS 2.9% 1.8% 0.527 Pneumonia 17% 9% 0.144

DVT 2.9% 4.1% 1.00 PE 5.8% 7.3% 1.00

Acute renal failure 0% 1.8% 0.420 Sepsis 0% 0.5% 0.689

Mortality 20% 22% 0.798

Product ABO Incompatible N = 35

ABO compatible N = 219

P Emergency release plasma

(units) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-4) 0.345 Total Incompatible Units 3 (2-4) 0 (0-0) <0.001 Total compatible units @ 24

hours 2 (0-6) 3 (2-6) 0.439 Total plasma @ 24 hours

(units) 6 (3-10) 4 (2-7) 0.444 Total RBC @ 24 hours (units) 5 (0-12) 4 (0-8) 0.472 Plasma:RBC @ 24 hours 1.3:1 1.1:1 0.155 Plasma deficit @ 24 hours 2 (0-3) 1 (-1-3) 0.195 Total Platelet units @ 24

hours 0 (0-2) 0 (0-1) 0.801

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

Product ABO Incompatible N = 35

ABO compatible N = 219

P Emergency release plasma

(units) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-4) 0.345 Total Incompatible Units 3 (2-4) 0 (0-0) <0.001 Total compatible units @ 24

hours 2 (0-6) 3 (2-6) 0.439 Total plasma @ 24 hours

(units) 6 (3-10) 4 (2-7) 0.444 Total RBC @ 24 hours (units) 5 (0-12) 4 (0-8) 0.472 Plasma:RBC @ 24 hours 1.3:1 1.1:1 0.155 Plasma deficit @ 24 hours 2 (0-3) 1 (-1-3) 0.195 Total Platelet units @ 24

hours 0 (0-2) 0 (0-1) 0.801

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

Product ABO Incompatible N = 35

ABO compatible N = 219

P Emergency release plasma

(units) 2 (1-4) 2 (1-4) 0.345 Total Incompatible Units 3 (2-4) 0 (0-0) <0.001 Total compatible units @ 24

hours 2 (0-6) 3 (2-6) 0.439 Total plasma @ 24 hours

(units) 6 (3-10) 4 (2-7) 0.444 Total RBC @ 24 hours (units) 5 (0-12) 4 (0-8) 0.472 Plasma:RBC @ 24 hours 1.3:1 1.1:1 0.155 Plasma deficit @ 24 hours 2 (0-3) 1 (-1-3) 0.195 Total Platelet units @ 24

hours 0 (0-2) 0 (0-1) 0.801

Group A Plasma Transfusion Results

Group A Plasma Transfusion Discussion

•  Emergency plasma use is increasing

•  Limited access

•  “New” universal

donor resulted in 97.6% reduction in AB plasma use

Group A Plasma Transfusion Discussion

•  Group A plasma has equivalent outcomes to group AB •  Incompatible transfusions occurred •  No hemolytic reactions •  Similar mortality •  Similar immunogenic complications

•  Limitations

•  Small comparison group

•  Type II error potential

•  Post-hoc analysis

43

CRASH-2 Study Lancet, Online Article, 2010

•  Prospective, randomized controlled trial •  20,211 patients •  TXA significantly reduced all cause mortality from 16.0% to

14.5% •  TXA significantly reduced death due to bleeding from 5.7% to

4.9% 43

44

45

StO2

Beilman Study •  Over a 15-month period, seven Level I trauma centers in

the USA enrolled 383 patients, 50 of whom developed MODS

•  StO2 below 75% indicates serious hypoperfusion in trauma patients

•  78% of patients who developed MODS, and 91% of patients who died, had StO2 below 75% in the first hour

•  Trauma patients who maintained StO2 above 75% within the first hour had an 88% chance of MODS-free survival

J Trauma 2006

Can early StO2 predict the need of blood product requirement in trauma

population?

Total 632 level 1 trauma 325 patients with recorded StO2

Variable  StO2< 65

n=23  StO2>65

n=302  p  

Systolic blood pressure, (SD) NS Heart rate, (SD) NS

Scene Assessment

Variable  StO2< 65

n=23  StO2>65

n=302  p  

Systolic blood pressure, (SD) 0.23 Heart rate, (SD) 0.39 Respiratory rate, (SD) 0.06 O2 saturation, (SD) 0.2

Temperature, (SD) 36.1 (1.2) 36.6 (0.7) Trauma score, (SD) 9 (2) 10 (2) Glasgow coma score, (SD) 7.7 (6) 10 (6)

Emergency Department Assessment

Variable StO2< 65

n=23

StO2>65 n=302

p

Hemoglobin, (SD) NS Hematocrit, (SD) NS pH, (SD) NS Base deficit, (SD) NS Lactate, (SD) 3.9 (3.2) 2.4 (2.1) FAST done NS Positive FAST NS

Laboratory Results and FAST

Variable StO2< 65

N=23

StO2>65 N=302

p

ICU  days,  (SD)   NS  Hospital  length  of  stay,  (SD)   NS  Mortality     NS  

Surgical  interven.on   18  (78%)   152  (50%)  Morbidity   11  (48%)   68  (23%)  

Outcomes

Multivariate analysis

Variable p

StO2  <  65%   0.01  Systolic  BP   0.11  Heart  rate   0.97  O2  satura.on   0.91  Lactate  level   0.25  Age   0.32  ISS   0.33  GCS   0.74  Posi.ve  FAST   0.19  

Current Status •  All 3 Mayo helicopter bases carrying 3 PRBC

and 3 thawed plasma •  All 3 use same transfusion triggers •  All 3 use i-Stat INR and ABG cartridges •  All 3 carry TXA; uses similar triggers but has

some limitations for use •  Just added StO2 as a trigger •  Limited waste at all 3 sites •  No crystalloid for those with hemorrhage •  Tourniquets and Combat Gauze on all 3 ships

The Future •  Freeze dried plasma? •  Whole blood? •  Platelets? •  Prothrombin complex concentrates?

Why Freeze Dried Plasma?

Remote Damage Control Resuscitation!

Implementation of Change •  Consensus •  Review of the literature and our own data •  Practicality and safety are first order of

business with best interest of patient in mind •  Continuous monitoring of program •  Education of all health care providers •  Willingness of blood bank and transfusion

medicine to consider novel use of products

Overall System Results •  Current era (2011) compared to the era

before pre-hospital plasma •  Referrals up (838 vs 998*) •  ISS up (9 vs 12*) •  Mortality same (2.5% vs 2.2%) •  Observed decline open abdomen (under study) •  Observed decline in massive tx (under study) •  Arrival TEG improved? (under study)

Summary •  Trauma patients die from shock •  Our job is to limit preventable trauma death •  First, identify the patient in shock •  Pre-hospital resuscitation with plasma can

prevent the trauma induced coagulopathy and limit the risk of death due to hemorrhage

•  Making dried plasma available in the rural and pre-hospital/austere environment will save lives

Thank You!

Questions?


Recommended