+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Implementation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point HACCP System to the Alcoholic Beverages...

Implementation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point HACCP System to the Alcoholic Beverages...

Date post: 28-Sep-2015
Category:
Upload: ramasubramanian-sankaranarayanan
View: 150 times
Download: 19 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
HACCP
Popular Tags:
46
FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 17(1), 1–44 (2001) IMPLEMENTATION OF HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM TO THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES INDUSTRY L. K. Kourtis and I. S. Arvanitoyannis University of Thessaly, School of Technological Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, Pedion Areos 38334, Volos, Greece (Hellas) ABSTRACT Alcoholic beverages (fermented or not) have been consumed for more than three thousand years and, generally, they have been considered safe because of their alcohol content. However, in recent years adulteration (i.e., use of low- cost, inappropriate alcohol) has made rapid progress in this field. Food and drink control and safety can be assured within the frame of strict adherence to quality and safety systems (ISO 9000 series, HACCP and TQM). The flow diagrams for the production of several alcohol drinks were shown, and an extensive hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) analysis was carried out in order to reveal the weaknesses of the production line and to suggest the critical limits in compliance with legislation and the corresponding preventive and corrective measures. Key Words: HACCP; Alcoholic beverages; Hazard; CCP; Ouzo; Gin; Vodka; Brandy; Distilled spirits; Wine; Sake; Beer. INTRODUCTION It has taken almost 30 years (since 1971 when it was officially presented for the first time) for the concept of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) to become universally accepted as one of the most rigorous preventive programs whose strict implementation can assure food safety (1,2). Although HACCP is a system Address correspondence to I. S. Arvanitoyannis, Dr., Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Copyright C 2001 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com
Transcript
  • FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 17(1), 144 (2001)

    IMPLEMENTATION OF HAZARD ANALYSISCRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEMTO THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES INDUSTRY

    L. K. Kourtis and I. S. Arvanitoyannis

    University of Thessaly, School of Technological Sciences, Departmentof Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, Pedion Areos 38334,

    Volos, Greece (Hellas)

    ABSTRACT

    Alcoholic beverages (fermented or not) have been consumed for morethan three thousand years and, generally, they have been considered safe becauseof their alcohol content. However, in recent years adulteration (i.e., use of low-cost, inappropriate alcohol) has made rapid progress in this field. Food and drinkcontrol and safety can be assured within the frame of strict adherence to qualityand safety systems (ISO 9000 series, HACCP and TQM). The flow diagrams forthe production of several alcohol drinks were shown, and an extensive hazardanalysis critical control point (HACCP) analysis was carried out in order toreveal the weaknesses of the production line and to suggest the critical limitsin compliance with legislation and the corresponding preventive and correctivemeasures.

    Key Words: HACCP; Alcoholic beverages; Hazard; CCP; Ouzo; Gin; Vodka;Brandy; Distilled spirits; Wine; Sake; Beer.

    INTRODUCTION

    It has taken almost 30 years (since 1971 when it was officially presented forthe first time) for the concept of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) tobecome universally accepted as one of the most rigorous preventive programs whosestrict implementation can assure food safety (1,2). Although HACCP is a system

    Address correspondence to I. S. Arvanitoyannis, Dr., Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected]

    1

    Copyright C 2001 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com

  • 2 KOURTIS AND ARVANITOYANNIS

    aiming at zero defect products, it is well known that this is not feasible and thereal target is the minimization of unacceptable unsafe products. When a companydecides to adopt HACCP it should be able to set controls at each point of theproduction line at which safety problems (physical, chemical, and microbiological)are likely to occur (3).

    Prior to initiating a HACCP system, a company must endeavor to put togethera HACCP plan, most often described by the five following steps (1,3,4,5): a) identifyHACCP resources and assemble the team, b) describe the food and its distributionmethod, c) state clearly intended use and consumers, and d) develop a process flowdiagram and e) verify the validity of this diagram in practice (operation).

    The regulatory requirements for Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures(SSOPs) in conjunction with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) should alsobe considered as a prerequisite to HACCP. The following seven HACCP principlesconstituting the major steps to writing an HACCP (6,3,7):

    1. Conduct a hazard analysis2. Identify critical control points (CCPs) by applying the HACCP decision

    tree (8, Fig. 1)3. Establish critical limits (CLs) for each CCP4. Establish monitoring actions5. Establish corrective actions6. Establish record-keeping procedures7. Establish verification proceduresToday, HACCP is continuously gaining importance and worldwide acceptabil-

    ity, being implemented by most countries all over the world. The implementation ofHACCP in the EU in particular was introduced by the Council Directives 91/43/93and 92/5/92. HACCPs implementation is considerably facilitated when other com-plementary quality assurance systems (ISO 9001/2) are already in place (9). Thecurrent tendency is integrating HACCP and ISO 9001 or ISO 9002 (10,11) withinthe frame of Total Quality Management.

    Since the two most important stages for the drink industry are fermentationand bottling, where hazards are likely to occur, special care is required (trainedpersonnel, sanitation, equipment maintenance, GMP).

    This review article aims to present an overview of HACCP implementation toalcoholic beverages through the production and distribution chains and to pinpointthe current CCPs, CLs and preventive and corrective actions due to be undertakenin case any deviations are observed.

    BEER

    Introduction

    Beer is an alcoholic beverage produced by the fermentation of wort obtainedfrom barley malt flavored with hops. The alcoholic content of beer ranges from 4%

  • HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT SYSTEM 3

    Figure 1. HACCP decision tree (102).

    for ordinary beer up to 15%. Beers first production in Mesopotamia by the Sume-rians in the 5th millennium B.C. classifies it among the most ancient of alcoholicbeverages. Towards the middle of the 3rd millennium B.C. there is documentary evi-dence of beer drinking by the Egyptians, who probably introduced beer technology

  • 4 KOURTIS AND ARVANITOYANNIS

    in Europe. Beer drinking in northern Europe dates back to early antiquity contraryto the Mediterranean countries, in which wine was the commonest drink. A criticalpoint in its history was the works of Louis Pasteur, which greatly contributed to theunderstanding of beer production (12).

    Beer Main Production Stages

    The main stages for beer production are shown schematically in Figure 2,together with their critical control point (CCP) numbers.

    Incoming Raw Materials (CCP1)

    The principal raw materials used to brew beer, are water, malted barley, hopsand yeast. Barley is required to be of sufficiently good malting quality in order togerminate and to produce a satisfactory product yield. Other factors such as dor-mancy and losses during malting have also to be considered (13). The malting orsubsequent brewing characteristics are subtly affected by the weather conditionsprevailing over the growing period. Some information regarding the quality of abatch of barley can be obtained by visual inspection, but usually it is complementedby analyses including moisture content, total nitrogen, 1000-grain weight and theportion of nongerminating grain. The National Institute of Agricultural Botany(UK) provides descriptions of the European malting varieties. Residues of certainpesticides used on malting barley survive through to the final malt and wort and canaffect the process and quality of the end product (CCP). Fungicides and herbicidesinfluencing enzyme synthesis during malting process can accumulate in the yeast,thereby affecting the next fermentation (14). The critical limits of these substancesare prescribed by Codex Alimentarius and are presented in Table 1. Presence ofheavy metals above the specifications of Directive 80/776/EC and mycotoxin pro-duction more than 0.04 mg/L, mainly from Fusarium species, such as aflatoxins,ochratoxine A, zearoleon, deoxyniralenol, constitutes a high risk for human health(CCP) (15). Temperature and relative humidity are two interacting parameters thatdefine the germination of spores of different microorganisms (16). Visual inspec-tion and biological plate methods detect the fungal contamination; for mycotoxinanalysis employment of HPLC or ELISA is required (17).

    The quality of the water used is a major factor affecting the beer quality(CCP). The development of strict water control standards was introduced by mostbreweries in which water is filtered through activated carbon as well as ion ex-change resins to remove impurities (pesticides, herbicides and industrial wastes).Two ions of particular importance in water are calcium and carbonate/bicarbonate,which control the pH during brewing. Calcium also protects -amylase from heatdestruction, thereby permitting liquefaction of starch during mashing (18).

    Hops not only provide bitter flavor to the beer but impart a hoppy characteras well. These aroma components are derived from the essential oil. The brewing

  • HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT SYSTEM 5

    Figure 2. Process flow diagram of beer production (22,26).

    value of hops depends on the resin fraction which amounts to 15%, and the essentialoil, comprising 0.5%. Total resin is defined as the material soluble in both coldmethanol and diethyl ether; soft resin is that proportion of the total which issoluble in hexane comprising mainly and -acids, while hard resin is insolublein hexane. The -acids that are the most significant bittering precursors can bedistinguished from other soft resins from their ability to form a lead salt which isinsoluble in methanol. The determination of moisture and seed content also provideuseful conclusions about their quality (13). Adjuncts of carbohydrate origin other

  • 6 KOURTIS AND ARVANITOYANNIS

    Tabl

    e1.

    Sum

    mar

    yo

    fHaz

    ards

    ,CCP

    s,CL

    s,M

    onito

    ring,

    Corre

    ctiv

    eA

    ctio

    ns,a

    nd

    Pers

    onne

    lRes

    pons

    ible

    forB

    eerP

    rodu

    ctio

    n

    Cont

    rol-

    Haz

    ards

    Prev

    entiv

    eM

    onito

    ring

    Corre

    ctiv

    eR

    espo

    nsib

    lePr

    oces

    sSte

    p(P,

    M,

    C)a

    Mea

    sure

    sCC

    PPa

    ram

    eter

    Criti

    calL

    imit

    Proc

    edur

    esA

    ctio

    nsPe

    rson

    nel

    Inco

    min

    gra

    w

    mat

    eria

    ls(C

    CP1)

    MCo

    ntro

    loff

    ungi

    devel

    opm

    ent,

    tem

    pera

    ture

    and

    RH

    regu

    latio

    ndu

    ring

    stor

    age

    Myc

    otox

    inpr

    oduc

    tion

    0.00

    4m

    g/L

    Visu

    alin

    spec

    tion

    off

    ungi

    devel

    opm

    ent

    HPL

    C,EL

    ISA

    ,EP

    San

    alys

    is

    Reje

    ction

    of

    spec

    ific

    batc

    hQu

    ality

    con

    trol

    man

    ager

    Certi

    fied

    supp

    liers

    ,sc

    hedu

    lein

    spec

    tions

    Pres

    ence

    of

    Ente

    ro-

    bact

    eria

    ceae

    0M

    icro

    biol

    ogic

    alan

    alys

    isR

    ejecti

    ono

    fsp

    ecifi

    cba

    tch

    Chan

    gesu

    pplie

    rSt

    rickt

    lyfo

    llow

    ing

    instr

    uctio

    nsCo

    ntam

    inat

    ion

    of

    mic

    robi

    alpr

    epar

    atio

    ns

    100%

    clea

    nCh

    ange

    prep

    arat

    ion

    met

    hod

    CEf

    ficie

    ntdi

    seas

    em

    anag

    emen

    tsy

    stem

    inu

    se

    Pest

    icid

    ere

    sidue

    sin

    barle

    y,ho

    ps,

    wat

    er

    By

    pesti

    cide

    as

    desc

    ribed

    byCo

    dex

    Spec

    ific

    chem

    ical

    anal

    yses

    Reje

    ction

    of

    spec

    ific

    batc

    hQu

    ality

    con

    trol

    man

    ager

    Certi

    fied

    supp

    liers

    Prop

    erw

    ater

    deco

    ntam

    inat

    ion

    Hea

    vy

    met

    als

    pres

    ence

    With

    insp

    ecifi

    catio

    nspr

    escr

    ibed

    inD

    irect

    ive

    80/7

    78/E

    C

    Reje

    ction

    of

    spec

    ific

    batc

    hD

    e-m

    etal

    lisat

    ion

    step

    Use

    ofd

    eion

    iser

    Wat

    ers

    elec

    trica

    lco

    ndu

    ctiv

    ity


Recommended