Implications of 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario innon-decoupling SUSY
Dilip Kumar Ghosh
Department of Theoretical PhysicsIndian Association for the Cultivation of Science
Kolkata, India
Collaborators:B. Bhattacherjee, M. Chakraborti, A. Chakraborty, U. Chattopadhyay, D. Das
Ref: [Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035011]
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 1 / 47
Plan of the talk
Introduction
Inclusive LEP-LHC Higgs (ILLH) scenario
ILLH @MSSM and NMSSM
Collider analysis and results
Updated analysis (in progress)
Summary
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 2 / 47
Introduction
[GeV]4lm80 100 120 140 160
Eve
nts
/2.5
Ge
V
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-1Ldt = 4.6 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
4l→(*)ZZ→H
Data(*)Background ZZ
tBackground Z+jets, t
=125 GeV)H
Signal (m
Syst.Unc.
Preliminary ATLAS
[GeV]4lm80 100 120 140 160 180
Eve
nts
/ 3
Ge
V
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35Data
Z+X
,ZZ*γZ
=126 GeVHm
CMS Preliminary -1 = 8 TeV, L = 19.6 fbs ; -1 = 7 TeV, L = 5.1 fbs
100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Eve
nts
/ 2
Ge
V
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
ATLAS Preliminaryγγ→H
-1Ldt = 4.8 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
-1Ldt = 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV, s
Selected diphoton sample
Data 2011+2012=126.8 GeV)
HSig+Bkg Fit (mBkg (4th order polynomial)
[GeV]γγm100 110 120 130 140 150 160E
ve
nts
- F
itte
d b
kg
-200-100
0100200300400500
(GeV)γγm120 140 160
Eve
nts
/ 1.5
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450DataS+B FitBkg Fit Component
σ1 ±σ2 ±
(MVA)-1 = 8 TeV, L = 19.6 fbs
CMS Preliminary
BDT 1
A Standard Model like Higgs particle has been found by the ATLAS & CMScollaboration of the LHC experiment with mh ' 125 GeV.Evidence of this particle in multiple channels.The observed rates of this particle are compatible with the SM prediction.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 3 / 47
Higgs couplings are not yet measured very precisely
With future LHC run and possibly at ILC the couplings will be measured moreprecisely =⇒ constrain several scenarios beyond the SM / or give a possibledirection to new physics.
)µSignal strength ( -1 0 +1
Combined
4l→ (*) ZZ→H
γγ →H
νlν l→ (*) WW→H
ττ →H
bb→W,Z H
-1Ldt = 4.6 - 4.8 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 13 - 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
-1Ldt = 4.6 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
-1Ldt = 4.8 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
-1Ldt = 4.6 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 20.7 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
-1Ldt = 4.6 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 13 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
-1Ldt = 4.7 fb∫ = 7 TeV: s-1Ldt = 13 fb∫ = 8 TeV: s
= 125.5 GeVHm
0.20± = 1.30 µ
ATLAS Preliminary
SMσ/σBest fit 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0.28± = 0.92 µ ZZ→H
0.20± = 0.68 µ WW→H
0.27± = 0.77 µ γγ →H
0.41± = 1.10 µ ττ →H
0.62± = 1.15 µ bb→H
0.14± = 0.80 µ Combined
-1 19.6 fb≤ = 8 TeV, L s -1 5.1 fb≤ = 7 TeV, L s
CMS Preliminary = 0.65
SMp
= 125.7 GeVH m
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 4 / 47
Can MSSM accommodate 125 GeV Higgs boson ?
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 5 / 47
125 GeV Higgs and MSSM
It seems that the observed 125 GeV Higgs like particle agrees well with predictionof MSSM.
In MSSM, the large quadratic divergence in m2h due to top quark loop is cancelledby the scalar partner of top quarks (called stop t̃i , with i = 1, 2).
Stop sector plays a crucial role in determining the Higgs mass =⇒ theexperimental determination of the stop properties is crucial to understand thenature of SUSY protecting the Higgs mass at EW scale.
So far LHC has not seen any evidence of SUSY particles, only lower bounds havebeen put on different SUSY particles.
Limits on gluino (g̃) and squarks (q̃) currently stands at about 1.5 TeV for mg̃ ' mq̃and about 1.2 TeV for mg̃ � mq̃.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 6 / 47
CMS SUSY exclusion
Mass scales [GeV]0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
0χ∼ l → l
~
0
χ∼ 0
χ∼ν τττ → ±χ∼ 2
0χ∼
0
χ∼ 0
χ∼ν τ ll→ ±χ∼ 2
0χ∼
0χ∼
0χ∼ H W →
2
0χ∼ ±χ∼
0χ∼
0χ∼ W Z →
2
0χ∼ ±χ∼
0χ∼0χ∼νν-l+ l→ -χ∼+χ∼
0χ∼
0χ∼ν lll → ±χ∼
2
0χ∼
0χ∼ bZ → b
~0
χ∼ tW → b~
0χ∼ b → b
~
H G)→ 0χ∼(0χ∼ t b → t~)0χ∼ W → ±χ∼ b (→ t~)0χ∼ W→ +χ∼ b(→ t~0χ∼ t → t~0χ∼ t → t~
0χ∼ q → q~0χ∼ q → q~
))0
χ∼ W→ ±χ∼ t(→ b~
b(→ g~)
0χ∼γ →
2
0χ∼ qq(→ g~
)0
χ∼ W→±χ∼|0
χ∼γ→2
0χ∼ qq(→ g~
)0χ∼ W→±χ∼ qq(→ g~)
0χ∼ Z →
2
0χ∼ qq (→ g~
)0χ∼ ν± l→ ±χ∼ qq(→ g~)0χ∼ t→ t~ t(→ g~)0χ∼ |0χ∼ W→±χ∼ qq(→ g~)
0χ∼ |
0χ∼ τ τ →
2
0χ∼ qq(→ g~
)0
χ∼-
l+
l→2
0χ∼ qq (→ g~
0χ∼ tt → g~
0χ∼ bb → g~0χ∼ qq → g~0χ∼ qq → g~
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-008 SUS-13-013 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-011 L=19.5 /fbx = 0.25
x = 0.50x = 0.75
SUS-13-008 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-12-001 L=4.93 /fb
SUS-11-010 L=4.98 /fb
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fbx = 0.05
x = 0.50x = 0.95
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-012 SUS-12-028 L=19.5 11.7 /fb
SUS-12-005 SUS-11-024 L=4.7 /fb
SUS-12-028 L=11.7 /fb
SUS-13-008 SUS-13-013 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-014 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-004 SUS-13-007 SUS-13-008 SUS-13-013 L=19.4 19.5 /fb
SUS-13-013 L=19.5 /fbx = 0.20
x = 0.50
SUS-13-004 SUS-12-024 SUS-12-028 L=19.3 19.4 /fb
SUS-12-001 L=4.93 /fb
SUS-13-012 SUS-12-028 L=19.5 11.7 /fb
SUS-12-010 L=4.98 /fb x = 0.25x = 0.50x = 0.75
SUS-12-005 SUS-11-024 L=4.7 /fb
SUS-13-008 SUS-13-013 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-13-017 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-12-004 L=4.98 /fb
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-11-011 L=4.98 /fb
SUS-13-011 SUS-13-004 L=19.5 19.3 /fb left-handed topunpolarized topright-handed topSUS-11-024 SUS-12-005 L=4.7 /fb
SUS-11-021 SUS-12-002 L=4.98 4.73 /fbx = 0.25
x = 0.50x = 0.75
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fb x = 0.05x = 0.50x = 0.95
SUS-13-006 L=19.5 /fb
SUS-11-030 L=4.98 /fb
glu
ino
pro
du
ctio
nsq
ua
rkst
op
sbo
tto
mE
WK
ga
ug
ino
ssl
ep
ton
Summary of CMS SUSY Results* in SMS framework
CMS Preliminary
m(mother)-m(LSP)=200 GeV m(LSP)=0 GeVSUSY 2013
= 7 TeVs
= 8 TeVs
lspm⋅-(1-x)
motherm⋅ = xintermediatem
For decays with intermediate mass,
Only a selection of available mass limits*Observed limits, theory uncertainties not included
Probe *up to* the quoted mass limit
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 7 / 47
ATLAS SUSY exclusion
Model e, µ, τ, γ Jets EmissT
∫L dt[fb−1] Mass limit Reference
Inclu
siv
eS
ea
rch
es
3rd
ge
n.
g̃m
ed
.3rd
ge
n.
sq
ua
rks
dir
ect
pro
du
ctio
nE
Wd
ire
ct
Lo
ng
-liv
ed
pa
rtic
les
RP
VO
the
r
MSUGRA/CMSSM 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(q̃)=m(g̃ ) ATLAS-CONF-2013-0471.7 TeVq̃, g̃
MSUGRA/CMSSM 1 e,µ 3-6 jets Yes 20.3 any m(q̃) ATLAS-CONF-2013-0621.2 TeVg̃
MSUGRA/CMSSM 0 7-10 jets Yes 20.3 any m(q̃) 1308.18411.1 TeVg̃
q̃q̃, q̃→qχ̃01 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ̃01)=0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-047740 GeVq̃g̃ g̃ , g̃→qq̄χ̃01 0 2-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ̃01)=0 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2013-0471.3 TeVg̃g̃ g̃ , g̃→qqχ̃±1→qqW ±χ̃01 1 e,µ 3-6 jets Yes 20.3 m(χ̃01)50 GeV 1209.07531.07 TeVg̃
GGM (wino NLSP) 1 e, µ + γ - Yes 4.8 m(χ̃01)>50 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-144619 GeVg̃GGM (higgsino-bino NLSP) γ 1 b Yes 4.8 m(χ̃01)>220 GeV 1211.1167900 GeVg̃GGM (higgsino NLSP) 2 e, µ (Z ) 0-3 jets Yes 5.8 m(H̃)>200 GeV ATLAS-CONF-2012-152690 GeVg̃
Gravitino LSP 0 mono-jet Yes 10.5 m(g̃ )>10−4 eV ATLAS-CONF-2012-147645 GeVF1/2 scale
g̃→bb̄χ̃01 0 3 b Yes 20.1 m(χ̃01)
125 GeV Higgs in SUSY
superparticles responsible for cancellation of quadratic divergence in Higgs massare the third generation squarks, can be comparatively light to cure the fine-tuningproblem of SM.
m2h ' m2Z cos2 2β +3
4π2m4tv2
(log
M2Sm2t
+X 2tM2S
(1− X2t
12M2S)
)MS =
√mt̃1 mt̃2
Xt ≡ At − µ cotβ
At : the trilinear Higgs-stop coupling.
mh =⇒ heavier for larger tanβ or MS .For a given MS , mh reaches maximum when Xt =
√6MS so-called mmaxh scenario.
Lighter stop/sbottom : large stop/sbottom tri-linear couplings.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 9 / 47
[L.J.Hall et.al, JHEP 04, 131 (2012)]
Light third generation scenario has an extremely attractive prospect for both thetheorists and the experimentalists
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 10 / 47
Did LEP give us any hint about Higgs ?
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 11 / 47
Higgs@LEP ?
At LEP, Higgs boson is searched in e+e− → ZH channel.Combined analysis of four LEP experiments: Mh > 114.4 GeV @ 95% C.L.
e−
e+
ZZ
H
gHZZ10
-2
10-1
1
20 40 60 80 100 120
mH(GeV/c2)
95%
CL
limit o
n ξ2 B
(H→b
b– )
LEP√s = 91-210 GeVH→bb
–(b)
Parameter: ζ ≡(
gBSMHZZgSMHZZ
)= sin(β − α)
( α: Higgs mixing angle, tanβ: ratio of VEVs)
A mild excess (∼ 2.3σ) of Higgs-like events e+e− → Zh with a mass near 98 GeV.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 12 / 47
LEP, LHC and SUSY
Both LEP and LHC events can be explained simultaneously in MSSM, andNMSSM.
MSSM: Five Higgses : h0,H0,A0,H±.
At tree level, MA and tanβ controls the MSSM Higgs sector.
Higgs couplings to gauge bosons and fermions are functions of β and α.
W +W−H, HZZ , ZAh, W±H∓h, ZW±H∓h and γW±H∓h ∝ cos(β − α).W +W−h, hZZ , ZAH, W±H∓H, ZW±H∓H and γW±H∓H ∝ sin(β − α).
decoupling : MA ≥ 300 GeV and cos2(β − α)→ 0 =⇒ sin2(β − α)→ 1.In decoupling limit : One can interpret the newly observed state at 125 GeV as thelight CP even Higgs boson with SM like couplings.
non-decoupling : Mh ∼ MA ∼ MH ∼ MZ or sin2(β − α)→ 0 =⇒ cos2(β − α)→ 1.This would mean larger coupling strength of H with the SM gauge bosons.
We may explore the possibility of MH ∼ 125 GeV, instead of h as the discoverednew resonance.
H behaves like hSM and h has weaker couplings to W/Z .
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 13 / 47
MSSM parameter space scan
We generate approximately 70 million random points in the following combinedrange of parameters:
We consider mpolet = 173.3± 2.8 GeV.
3 < tanβ < 5.5, 0.085 < MA < 0.2 TeV, 0.3 TeV < µ < 12 TeV,
0.05 TeV < M1,M2 < 1.5 TeV, 0.9 TeV < M3 < 3 TeV,
−8 TeV < At < 8 TeV, −3 TeV < Ab, Aτ < 3 TeV, Au = Ad = Ae = 0,0.3 TeV < Mq̃3 < 5 TeV, where, q̃3 ≡ t̃L, t̃R , b̃L, b̃R
Mq̃i = 3 TeV, for i = 1, 2 and M ˜̀i = 3 TeV, for i = 1, 2, 3.
CMS has constrained tanβ −MA plane from H/A→ τ+τ− decay.ATLAS has constrained tanβ −MH± plane from H+ → τ+ντ in t t̄ events, whereone t → bH+.
[CMS-PAS-HIG-2012-050],[ATLAS Collaboration, JHEP 06 (2012),039]
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 14 / 47
CMS exclusion in tanβ −MA plane
[GeV]Am200 400 600 800
βta
n
05
101520253035404550 CMS
-1 = 7+8 TeV, L = 17 fbsPreliminary,
= 1 TeVSUSY
scenariomaxhMSSM m
ObservedExpected
expectedσ 1± expectedσ 2±
LEP
95% CL Excluded Regions
M
90 < MA < 250 GeV for tanβ > 5.5 is excluded.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 15 / 47
ATLAS exclusion in tanβ −MH± plane
[GeV]+Hm90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
βta
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Median expected exclusion
Observed exclusion 95% CL
theoryσObserved +1
theoryσObserved -1
-1Ldt = 4.6 fb∫Data 2011
=7 TeVs maxhmATLAS
[GeV]+H
m
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
βta
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Median expected exclusion
Observed exclusion 95% CL
theoryσObserved +1 theoryσObserved -1
Expected exclusion 2011
Observed exclusion 2011
-1Ldt = 19.5 fb∫
Data 2012
=8 TeVs maxh
m
+jetsτ
ATLAS Preliminary
90 < MH± < 150 GeV for 2 < tanβ < 6 is excluded.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 16 / 47
ILLH in MSSM
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
MA
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
tanβ
CMS Exclusion
(H/A -> τ+ τ
−)
Effective Exclusion
(H+-->τ
+ν)
I
II
III IV
ATLASfrom
(GeV)
The blue points satisfy following constraints:Lower limits on SUSY particles95 GeV < mh < 101 GeV; 122 GeV < mH < 128 GeV.0.1 < sin2(β − α) < 0.25 .RH2gg (γγ)min > 0.5, [ CMS : µ̂ = 0.78
+0.28−0.26 ].
2.77× 10−4 < Br(b → sγ) < 4.09× 10−4 at 3σ level.[Br(b → sγ)(exp) = (3.43± 0.22)× 10−4]. [arXiv:1207.1158].0.67× 10−9 < Br(Bs → µ+µ−) < 6.22× 10−9 at 2σ level.
The red circles (enclosing blue points) shows points satisfy the DM relic densityconstraint (only upper limit): 0.112 < Ωχ̃01 h
2 < 0.128.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 17 / 47
ILLH in MSSM
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200M
H+ (GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
tanβ
(H+ -
->τ+
ν)A
TL
AS
Exc
lusi
on
Effective Exclusion fromCMS (H/A-->τ+τ−)
I
II
IIIIV
From our previous figure : 130 GeV< MA
Higgs decay observables
Anti-correlation behavior between primarysignal strength observables.Total Higgs decay width is primarilydetermined by h→ bb̄ decay width.QCD and SUSY QCD corrections to mb(∆b) play important roles in modifying thetotal decay width/ relevant branching ratios.A reduction (enhancement) of h,H → bb̄couplings decreases (increases) the totaldecay width of Higgs.Enhances (reduces) the branching ratios toh,H → γγ increasing (decreasing)Rhgg(γγ) or RHgg(γγ).
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
R (γγ)ggH
RVHH(bb)
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
0.5
1
1.5
2
R (γγ)ggH
RVHH(τ
+τ
−)
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 19 / 47
Sample benchmark point in MSSM parameter space
Mt MA tan β µ M1 M2 M3 At Ab173.6 167.5 5.0 5429.8 527.9 119.2 1416.6 5729.2 -217.1
Aτ Mq̃3LMt̃R
Mb̃RMh MH M(H
±) Mt̃1Mb̃1
-115.2 1712.6 1602.2 426.7 97.7 125.1 182.1 999.2 539.1
Mg̃ BR(Bs → µ+µ−) BR(b → sγ) Ωh2 ζσSI
(p−χ)1608.9 2.8×10−9 3.8×10−4 4.5×10−4 5.5×10−11
All masses are in GeV unit
cross-section is pb unit.
Main issues of our analysis in MSSM :
In MSSM one can have 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs bosons.
This restrict : 3 < tanβ < 5.5, 130 GeV < MA < 200 GeV and 150 GeV < MH± < 200 GeV
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 20 / 47
ILLH in NMSSM
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 6000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
MA
1
MA
2
(GeV)
(GeV
)
λŜĤuĤd + κ3 Ŝ3.
3 (2) CP even (odd) neutral Higgses, Hi , i = 1, 2, 3 and Ai , i = 1, 2, and H±.
We vary λ, κ, Aλ, Aκ, A0, m0, m1/2, tanβ, µeff using NMSSMTools3.2.4.
In this parameter (figure) space of interest, MA2 ∼ MH3 ∼ MH± .Heavy mass scale (MA > 200 GeV) =⇒ can accommodate mh ∼ 98 GeV ( notpossible in MSSM with MA > 200 GeV.)
Indirect exclusion: A bit tough, particle masses relatively heavy, so less sensitiveat the LHC.
Exclusion is Model dependent.
Can we discover/exclude this at LHC in a model independent way ?
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 21 / 47
Prospect of observing 98 GeV Higgs @ Colliders
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 22 / 47
Can we find this 98 GeV Higgs @LHC ?
A combination of a 98 GeV & a 125 GeV Higgs boson in the nondecoupling limit ofMSSM and in NMSSM.
Nondecoupling limit of MSSM: =⇒ relatively light Higgs bosons =⇒ can beprobed at the early run of the LHC.
Non observation of such light Higgs bosons will indirectly exclude the possibility ofscenario with a 98 GeV Higgs boson.
Previous attempts :
At 8 TeV LHC, 5σ signal for pp → H±A0,H±h0 → τ±νbb̄ andpp → H+H− → τ+ντ−ν̄ can be observed with an integrated luminosity of7(11) fb−1 and 24(48) fb−1, respectively for MA = 95(130) GeV.
At the 14 TeV energy : 5σ signal can be observed with an integrated luminosity of4(7) fb−1 and 10(19) fb−1 respectively. [N.D.Christensen etal. 2012]
ATLAS search : 130 < MA < 200 GeV for tanβ ∼ 3− 5.5 ruled out the aboveanalysis and some others.
[M. Drees, PRD (2005) & (2012), N.D.Christensen etal. 2012, M. Asano etal. PRD (2012), S. Scopel etal. PRD (2013)].
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 23 / 47
Can we find this 98 GeV Higgs @LHC ?
Gluon fusion: g g→ H→ bb̄ for 98 GeV Higgs boson, large QCD jet background,difficult to prove.
Di-photon via Gluon fusion: Heavily suppressed BR(H→ γγ) for a 98 GeV Higgs,hard to distinguish from the continuous backgrounds.
VBF production: not so sensitive for a 98 GeV Higgs boson.
Higgs-strahlung process (VH): H is produced along with a gauge boson W/Z ,may have sufficient boost (large pT of Higgs)
p
p
W/Z
W/Z
H
gHWW/gHZZ
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 24 / 47
2.3σ excess in the LEP constrains the effective coupling :gBSMZZh /g
SMZZh ' 0.3− 0.5
⇒ controls the 98 GeV Higgs production cross-section in Vh at LHC⇒ A Model independent input parameter.
We follow ATLAS simulation considering 20% LEP excess and apply the JetSubstructure technique.
E/T > 30 GeV and pe/µT > 30 GeV [ hW ,W → µν, eν]
80 < m`` < 100 GeV, [ hZ ,Z → e+e−/µ+µ−]E/T > p
minT , with p
minT = 200 GeV [hZ ,Z → νν̄ and hW , W → `ν, ` is missing. ]
Process Significance ( S√B
) Combined`νbb̄ 1.7`+`−bb̄ 0.9 2.5E/T bb̄ 1.6
1 98 GeV Higgs at the 14 TeV LHC with 300 fb−1 luminosity is ∼ 2.5σ.2 This signal significance may be reduced further if systematic uncertainties in the
SM background estimations are considered.
[ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-008]
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 25 / 47
Associated production with top quarks
Associated production of 98 GeV Higgs boson with top quarks:
pp → t t̄h(h→ bb̄)
σ(pp → t t̄h) ∼ 1 pb for mh ∼ 100 GeV. at 14 TeV run of LHC. [CERN Yellow Report Page At 14TeV]Translated the results already performed by Tilman Plehn et. al. for ∼ 115 GeVStandard Model Higgs boson at 14 TeV LHC. [T. Plehn et.al. PRL 104, 111801 (2010)]
While translating the results of Tilman Plehn for our choice of Higgs mass, weexpect enhancements of 60% and 20% in Higgs production rate and backgroundestimation.
In our analysis, we scale the signal and background by 1.6 and 1.2, respectivelyfor h(mh = 98 GeV)→ bb̄).For an integrated luminosity of 300 fb−1 with two tagged b-jets the significance ∼3.1σ, while for three b-tag sample ∼ 2.6σ.Jet Substructure may marginally exclude the 98 GeV Higgs: experimentalcollaborations need to perform further detailed analysis.
In NMSSM A 98 GeV Higgs production from the decay of heavy Higgs bosons aswell as from the cascade decays of other sparticles may play an important role atthe LHC. [S.F. King et.al. NPB 870,323 (2013); Z.Kang et.al. PRD 88,015006 (2013)]
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 26 / 47
ILC
There has been a plan to build e+e− linear collider (ILC) with√
s ∼ 250 GeV -1000 GeV.
Like LEP, the Higgs boson will be produced in e+e− → Zh channel.ILC will be an ideal machine for the Higgs precision study.
In our analysis, we assume h→ bb̄ decay mode, while Z can decay leptonically orhadronically.
We use MadGraph5 to estimate the signal as well as SM backgroundcross-section for the 98 GeV Higgs boson.
For√
s = 250 GeV, σ(e+e− → Zh) = 350 fb, whereas σ(e+e− → ZZ ) ∼ 1.1 pb.We find that a 98 GeV Higgs boson can be easily discovered / excluded at the 250GeV ILC with a 100 fb−1 luminosity.
Discovery potential at the LHC is marginal.
ILC is an ideal machine to study this scenario.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 27 / 47
Updated analysis (work in progress)
We relook the MSSM parameter space in the light of updated Higgs data:
ATLAS limits :
Rγγ : 1.55+0.33−0.28@[7 TeV(4.8) + 8 TeV(20.7)]
RZZ∗ : 1.43+0.40−0.35@[7 TeV(4.6) + 8 TeV(20.7)]
Rbb̄ : 0.2+0.7−0.6 @[7 TeV(4.7) + 8 TeV(20.3)]
Rτ+τ− : 1.4+0.5−0.4 @[8 TeV(20.3)]
CMS limits :
Rγγ : 0.78+0.28−0.26@[7 TeV(5.1) + 8 TeV(19.6)]
RZZ∗ : 0.93+0.29−0.25@[7 TeV(5.1) + 8 TeV(19.7)]
Rbb̄ : 1.0+0.5−0.5 @[7 TeV(5.1) + 8 TeV(18.9)]
Rτ+τ− : 0.87+0.29−0.29@[7 TeV(4.9) + 8 TeV(19.7)]
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 28 / 47
Updated analysis
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
tanβ
All points satisfy following constraints :95 GeV < mh < 101 GeV and 122 GeV < mH < 128 GeV0.1 < sin2(β − α) < 0.252.77× 10−4 < Br(b → sγ) < 4.09× 10−40.67× 10−9 < Br(Bs → µ+µ−) < 6.22× 10−9
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 29 / 47
Limits from the ATLAS and CMS Higgs search data
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5ta
nβ
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
tanβ
All points satisy previous constraints and Rγγ @2σ level .
ATLAS left figure and CMS right figure
Point to note : 130 GeV < MA < 200 GeV is allowed from CMS analysis ofH/A→ τ+τ−.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 30 / 47
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5ta
nβ
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
tanβ
Previous constraints plus RZZ∗ and Rbb̄ @2σ level
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 31 / 47
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5ta
nβ
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
MA
(GeV)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
tanβ
Previous constraints plus Rτ+τ− @2σ level .
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 32 / 47
Conclusions
We studied the possibility that both the LEP excess in the bb̄ final state with a 98GeV Higgs boson and the LHC signal for a 125 GeV Higgs like object can besimultaneously explained in the most general MSSM framework.
This can happen in nondecoupling zone of MSSM Higgs sector, where,Mh ∼ MA ∼ MH ∼ MZ or sin2(β − α)→ 0 =⇒ cos2(β − α)→ 1.We have found a region of parameter space in MSSM allowed by heavy flavourphysics, CDM constraints, constraints from the XENON100 experiment on the DMdirect detection cross-section.
Both ATLAS & CMS searches on H/A→ τ+τ− and H± → τ+ντ from ATLAScollaboration severely constraint the parameter space : 130 GeV < MA < 200 GeVand 150 GeV < MH± < 200 GeV.
For these ranges of MA and MH± , tanβ ∼ 3− 5.5.We have shown that at the LHC it will be difficult to probe directly 98 GeV Higgsboson scenario, due low signal significance.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 33 / 47
Work in progress..
The most recent data (at 2σ) on Higgs search still allow MSSM parameter spacewhere one can have simultaneously 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs boson.
More precise measurement on Higgs may be able to rule out this scenarioindirectly.
ILC is an ideal machine to explore this possibility.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 34 / 47
Thank You!
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 35 / 47
References
1 B. Bhattacherjee et. al., arXiv:1305.4020 [hep-ph].2 R. Barate et al. [LEP Higgs WG], Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).3 T. Plehn et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 111801 (2010).4 J. Butterworth et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 242001 (2008).5 ATLAS Public NOTE: ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-088
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 36 / 47
Backup slides
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 37 / 47
Dark matter direct detection
Exclude points with over-abundant relicdensities, include the possibility ofmulti-component dark matter.
χ̃01-χ̃±1 coannihilation: χ̃
01 a pure bino & χ̃
±1
is pure wino.Heavy sleptons: no coannihilation withLSPs.spin-independent direct detection χ̃01 − p:Region above the solid (black) linediscarded via XENON100 dataScaled cross-section (ζσSI
pχ̃01):
under-abundant relic densities.ζ = min{1,Ωχ̃01
h2/(ΩCDM h2)min}, where
(ΩCDM h2)min = 0.112Possibility at future direct-detectionexperiment XENON-1T
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
mχ
1
(GeV)
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
σS
I (p
-χ) (p
b)
0~
XENON100
XENON1T
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
mχ
1
(GeV)
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
ζσ
SI (
p-χ
) (p
b)
XENON100
0~
XENON1T
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 38 / 47
Can we find this 98 GeV Higgs @LHC ?
No Boost vs Boost
H → bb̄ at rest =⇒ Two back to back jets
mH = 120 GeV, pT >∼ 200− 300 GeV =⇒large boost =⇒ ∆R ≈ 2mH/pT ≈ 1.2− 0.8∆R =
√(∆η)2 + (∆φ)2
G. Kribs talk @ Fermilab (2011)
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 39 / 47
Application : pp → VH, (V = W±,Z )
pp → VH, with V = W±,Z =⇒`νbb̄, ``bb̄, νν̄bb̄ final state
For Higgs to be boosted pT (H) > 200 GeV
Such a high pT (H) =⇒σboosted(WH/ZH) ∼ 5% of σtot(WH/ZH) @14 TeV
ATLAS simulation @14 TeV with 30fb−1luminosity : NS(mH ∼ 120 GeV) ∼ 13.5and NB ∼ 20.3 =⇒ S√B = 3
[J.Butterworth etal., PRL (2008)], ATL-PHYS-PUB-2009-088, G. Kribs talk @ Fermilab (2011)
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 40 / 47
Fat jets
Quantitatively, consider the following thumb rule for a two-body decay: To resolve
the two partons of a X→ q q̄ decay,choose a radius (or more generally a jet size)of R < 2MX /PTFor PT � Mh R → very small ( Overlap of Jet areas !)
These highly boosted jets are called ”Fat Jets”
Example: Consider a hadronically decaying W Boson..
Question : How do I see the inside of this fat jet ?
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 41 / 47
Jet Substructure
The basis of this technique involves an iterative jet clustering algorithm (e.g C/A),examining subjet kinematics step-by-step, and finally choosing the “best“ subjets toform the fat-jet mass.
**Ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 100.242001, Butterworth, Davison, Rubin & Salam
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 42 / 47
Jet Decomposition 1
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 43 / 47
Jet Decomposition 2
Step 1: Break the jet j into two subjets( j1,j2) by undoing its last stage of clustering s.tmj1 > mj2 .
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 44 / 47
Jet Decomposition 3
Step 2: a) Significant mass drop (MD),
mj1 < µmj
b) Splitting is nearly Symmetric
y = [min(P2Tj1 ,P2Tj2
)/m2j ]∆R2j1,j2 > ycut
Two parameters µ and ycut are independent of Higgs mass and Higgs pt .
µ = 0.667
ycut = (0.3)2
⇒ Helps to reject/minimize QCD contamination.
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 45 / 47
Jet Decomposition 4
Step 3: If y> ycut , consider j as heavy particle neighborhood and exit the loop.
Otherwise
Redefine j to be j1 and go back to Step 1.
In practice, above procedure is not optimal for LHC, when the transverse momentumcan be around 250-300 GeV.Since,
mx ∼150 GeV ⇒ Rj1,j2 ∼ 1.0→ Large
⇒ Significant degradation due the Underlying Events (UE)
→ UE ∝ R4j1,j2
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 46 / 47
Filtering
To minimize UE contamination ⇒ Filter the subjets j1, j2 within a finer angularregion, Rfilt < Rj1,j2Consider 3 hardest pT subjets 2b & gluon
Most Effective result ( In the context of Higgs search)⇒Rfilt = min(Rj1,j2/2, 0.3)
(provided, both the subjets have tagged b’s)
Dilip Kumar Ghosh (IACS) 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenario IPMU, Tokyo (Japan), 19.03.2014 47 / 47