+ All Categories
Home > Documents > IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group...

IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group...

Date post: 20-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
1 IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR FORECASTS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR FORECASTS OF WORLD CO OF WORLD CO 2 2 EMISSIONS AND EMISSIONS AND ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS Roger H. Bezdek. Ph.D., President Management Information Services, Inc. [email protected] Presented at The Unconventional Fuels Forum Houston, Texas May 2008
Transcript
Page 1: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

1

IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR FORECASTSPRODUCTION PEAKING FOR FORECASTS

OF WORLD COOF WORLD CO22 EMISSIONS AND EMISSIONS AND ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONSATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS

Roger H. Bezdek. Ph.D., PresidentManagement Information Services, Inc.

[email protected]

Presented at The Unconventional Fuels Forum

Houston, TexasMay 2008

Page 2: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

22

THIS PRESENTATIONTHIS PRESENTATION• Peak oil• Peak natural gas• Peak coal• Peak fossil fuels• CO2 emissions forecasts• CO2 concentration forecasts• Findings• Conclusions• Implications• The real problem• Recommendations

Page 3: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

3

PEAK OIL: WORLD HAS BEEN CONSUMING PEAK OIL: WORLD HAS BEEN CONSUMING MUCH MORE OIL THAN IT HAS BEEN FINDINGMUCH MORE OIL THAN IT HAS BEEN FINDING

0

10

20

30

40

50

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007

billi

on b

arre

ls p

er v

ear

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

Reserve Additions

Consumption

Page 4: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

4

PEAK OIL: AND THIS TREND WILL CONTINUEPEAK OIL: AND THIS TREND WILL CONTINUE (Actual and Projected World Oil Reserve Additions)(Actual and Projected World Oil Reserve Additions)

0

10

20

30

40

50

1900's 1920's 1940's 1960's 1980's 2000's 2020's

billi

on b

arre

ls p

er y

ear

Actual

ProjectionProjection

Page 5: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

5

WORLD LIQUID FUEL PRODUCTION WORLD LIQUID FUEL PRODUCTION HAS PLATEAUEDHAS PLATEAUED

4% Production Fluctuation

Band

87

8685

84

8382

8180

79

7877

76

7574

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Wor

ld O

il Pr

oduc

tion

Mill

ions

of b

arre

ls p

er d

ay Plateau

President Bush: "If they [Saudi Arabia] don't have a lot of additional oil to put on the market, it is hard to ask somebody to do something they may not be able to do."

Page 7: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

7

PEAKING IS NATURALPEAKING IS NATURAL

Oil Fields Peak

(Notional)

1945 2000Year

Prod

uctio

n

U.S Lower 48 States

Regions Peak (Many oil fields)

The world will peak(All regions)

Time - Decades

Prod

uctio

n

Page 8: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

8

1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 19772.9

3.0

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -M

M b

/d

100%

90%

85%

Perc

ent o

f M

axim

um95%

Texas

O

Peak in

1972.5

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0

15.2

15.4

15.6

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -M

M b

/d

100%

98%

Perc

ent o

f Max

imum

North America

96%

94%

Peak in

1985

1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 20042.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3.0

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -M

M b

/d

100%

90%

85%

Perc

ent o

f Max

imum

95%

United Kingdom

Peak in

1999

1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

2.9

3.0

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -M

M b

/d

100%

90%

85%

Perc

ent o

f Max

imum

95%

Norway

Peak in

2001

EXAMPLES OF OIL PEAKINGEXAMPLES OF OIL PEAKING

54 of 65 of the most important oil-producing

countries have peaked

Page 9: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

9

WORLD OIL PEAKING FORECASTSWORLD OIL PEAKING FORECASTS (Most Forecasters Expect Peak at < 100 MMbpd)(Most Forecasters Expect Peak at < 100 MMbpd)

Forecaster Date

K. Deffeyes, (retired professor & retired Shell) 2005 M. Simmons, M. (oil expert & businessman) 2005 E.T. Westervelt, et al. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) 2005 Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired Saudi Aramco executive) 2007/08 S. Bakhtiari, (Iranian National Oil Co. planner) 2007/08 T. Boone Pickens (oil & gas investor) 2007/08 D. Goodstein, (Vice Provost, Cal Tech) By 2010 C.T. Maxwell, Weeden & Co. (brokerage) By 2010 D. Strahan (energy analyst) By 2010 R. Bentley, (university energy analyst) 2010 C. Campbell, (retired oil company geologist) 2010/11 C. Skrebowski, (editor of Petroleum Review) 2010/11 L.M. Meling, (Statoil oil company geologist) 2011 X. Pang, (China Petroleum University) 2012 International Energy Agency 2012 Merrill Lynch (Brokerage/Financial) 2015 J.R. West, PFC Energy (Consultants) 2015 Shell 2015 Volvo Trucks By 2017 C. de Margerie (Oil company executive) By 2017 Wood Mackenzie (Energy consulting) By 2020 CERA (Energy consulting) After 2030 U.S. Energy Information Administration After 2030 ExxonMobil After 2030

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Page 10: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

10

MISI FORECAST OF WORLDMISI FORECAST OF WORLD LIQUID FUELS PRODUCTIONLIQUID FUELS PRODUCTION

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

0

20

40

60

80

100

1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045

Mbp

d

Production peaks ~ 2015 at~ 95 MMbpd -- ~ 5.1 BTOE/yr.

Page 11: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

11

PEAK NATURAL GASPEAK NATURAL GAS

• Data on worldwide NG reserves &resources even less reliable than for oil

• Much disagreement among experts• Reasonable figure for ultimate recoverable

conventional gas in world is ~ 10,000 tcf• An additional ~ 2,500 tcf of unconventional gas• ¾ the world’s NG reserves located in the Middle East

and Eurasia• Russia, Iran, and Qatar combined account for ~ 60% of

the world’s NG reserves• NG much more difficult & expensive to transport than oil

Page 12: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

12

CONVENTIONAL NG ULTIMATE RESERVESCONVENTIONAL NG ULTIMATE RESERVES (Mean Values)

Ultimate Found Produced Remaining

Known Reserves TCF

Middle East 3,000 2,860 200 2,660 CIS 2,000 1,830 700 1,100 US 1,250 1,200 960 240 Asia 1,150 920 180 740 Africa 800 620 100 520 Latin America 800 580 150 430 Europe 800 620 300 320 Canada 250 215 155 60 World 10,000 8,800 2,700 6,100 OPEC 3,600 3,500 400 3,100

Source: Jean Laharrere, derived from the Oil and Gas Journal, World Oil, American Petroleum Institute, BP Statistical Review, OPEC, and IHS, Inc.

Page 13: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

13

NATURAL GAS DISCOVERY AND FORECAST NATURAL GAS DISCOVERY AND FORECAST CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020

0

20

40

60

1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

billi

on b

arre

ls o

il eq

uiva

lent

discovered demand

NG discoveredglobally peaked

In 1970

Since mid-1990sNG use has been

exceeding discoveries

Page 14: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

14

CUMULATIVE WORLD NG CUMULATIVE WORLD NG DISCOVERY AND PRODUCTIONDISCOVERY AND PRODUCTION

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

cum

ulat

ive

Tcf

discovery production

Page 15: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

15

NG PRODUCTION FORECASTS BEING LOWEREDNG PRODUCTION FORECASTS BEING LOWERED

0

40

80

120

160

200

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

tcf

EIA'07 IEA'06 EIA'06

conventional

unconventional

Recent 2030 forecastslowered from >180 tcf to ~ 160 tcf

Page 16: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

16

MISI NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION FORECASTMISI NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION FORECAST

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

billi

on to

e

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Production peaks ~ 2030 at ~ 140 tcf – ~ 3.3 BTOE/yr.

Page 17: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

17

PEAK COALPEAK COAL

• Concept of peak coal as viable as peak oil and peak NG

• Difference is amount of reserves and extraction methods• Some nations already passed “peak coal,”

e.g., UK, Germany, Japan – 20 in all• However, some major coal producing

nations have young coal industry thatis in beginning of production curves

• Some analysts pessimistic about futureworld coal production

• Strong arguments also made that worldcoal resources and production potential under-estimated

Page 18: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

18

SOME RECENT PEAK COAL ESTIMATESSOME RECENT PEAK COAL ESTIMATES

Forecaster Date Level National Coal Council No U.S. peak prior to 2030 None given Southern States Energy Board No U.S. peak prior to 2030 None given Energy Watch Group World peak in 2025 6.4 billion tons (world) Mikael Hööka, Werner Zittelb, Jörg Schindlerb, Kjell Alekletta

World peak in 2030 8.3 billion tons (world)

Gregson Vaux, NETL energy researcher

U.S. peak in 2032 3.3 billion tons (U.S)

Jean Laherrere, energy analyst World peak in 2050 3.6 Btoe (world) Pushker Kharecha and James Hansen, energy researchers

World peak in 2077 None given

Thomas Thielemann, Sandro Schmidt, and J. Peter Gerling, energy researchers

No world physical coal constraints through 2100

None given

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Page 19: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

19

ESTIMATES OF WORLD COAL PRODUCTIONESTIMATES OF WORLD COAL PRODUCTION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

billi

on to

e

EIA Ref IEA Ref IEA Alt Hooka, et.al.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2007; International Energy Agency, 2006; and Mikael Hööka, Werner Zittelb, Jörg Schindlerb, Kjell Alekletta, 2007.

Page 20: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

20

MISI WORLD COAL PRODUCTION FORECASTMISI WORLD COAL PRODUCTION FORECAST

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080

billi

on to

ns

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Production peaks~ 2040 at ~ 8.7 billiontons, ~ 4.1 BTOE/yr.

Page 21: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

21

MISI ESTIMATES OF WORLD LIQUID FUELS, MISI ESTIMATES OF WORLD LIQUID FUELS, NATURAL GAS, & COALNATURAL GAS, & COAL PRODUCTIONPRODUCTION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

billi

on to

e

oil coal gas

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Page 22: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

22

MISI WORLD FOSSIL FUELMISI WORLD FOSSIL FUEL PRODUCTION FORECASTPRODUCTION FORECAST

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

billi

on to

e

Source: Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

Total world fossil fuels productionwill peak ~ 2017 at ~ 11.5 BTOE/yr.

Page 23: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

23

CARBON DIOXIDE FORECASTSCARBON DIOXIDE FORECASTS

• CO2 emissions usually forecast over extended time period – often 100 yrs +

• Forecasts include CO2 atmospheric concentrations• CO2 atmospheric concentrations much more difficult to

forecast, and forecasts differ widely• IPCC developed series of 24 climate change projections• IPCC contends that:

-- World carbon emissions must peak by 2015 to avoidirreversible climate change

-- CO2 atmospheric concentrations must not exceed450 ppm

Page 24: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

24

IPCC SCENARIOS THROUGH 2100IPCC SCENARIOS THROUGH 2100

Page 25: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

25

IPCC ESTIMATES OF IMPACTSIPCC ESTIMATES OF IMPACTS

Page 26: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

26

RETHINKING CORETHINKING CO22 FORECASTSFORECASTS

• We used MISI peak fossil fuels forecasts and historical CO2 emission levels through 2005

• Estimated CO2 emission levels based on fossil fuels consumption through 2050

• Estimated CO2 concentration levels based on fossil fuels consumption through 2050

• MISI estimates that:-- CO2 emissions will peak ~ 2017 at ~ 31.4 Bmt –

11% higher than in 2005-- CO2 atmospheric concentration will peak ~ 2042 at

~ 430 ppm, and will then decline

Page 27: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

27

MISI ESTIMATE OF WORLD COMISI ESTIMATE OF WORLD CO22 EMISSIONS, 1980EMISSIONS, 1980--20502050

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

mill

ion

met

ric to

ns

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2007, and Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

CO2 emissions peak ~ 2017at 31.4 Bmt – 11% > 2005

Page 28: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

28

MISI ESTIMATE OF WORLD COMISI ESTIMATE OF WORLD CO22 CONCENTRATIONS, 1960CONCENTRATIONS, 1960--20502050

0

100

200

300

400

500

1959 1966 1973 1980 1987 1994 2001 2008 2015 2022 2029 2036 2043 2050

ppm

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, ESRL, 2008, and Management Information Services, Inc., 2008.

CO2 atmospheric concentrationpeaks ~ 2042 at ~ 430 ppm

and then declines

Page 29: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

29

MISI ESTIMATES MAY BE MISI ESTIMATES MAY BE ““WORST CASEWORST CASE””

• MISI estimates may be high:-- Many analysts contend that oil will peak before 2015

at < 95 MM bpd-- Our forecast assumes that 2005 GHG controls will

remain at same level through 2050-- However, technology developments will likely lower

MISI forecast of CO2 emissions-- Further, world economy is becoming less CO2

intensive per unit of output, and this trend willaccelerate

Page 30: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

30

FINDINGSFINDINGS

• Peak oil drives peak fossil fuels and CO2 emissions/ concentrations

• World fossil fuel production peaks ~ 2017, 2 years after peak oil

• CO2 and carbon equivalent emissions peak ~ 2017• CO2 atmospheric concentration peaks ~ 2042 at ~ 430

ppm • Fossil fuel peaking will prevent attainment of CO2

levels forecast by IPCC and others• MISI findings are conservative and robust:

-- Oil may peak prior to 2015-- CO2 estimates ± 2-3 years do not change

conclusions-- New technologies will further reduce output CO2

Page 31: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

31

IMPLICATIONSIMPLICATIONS

• IPCC: -- “World CO2 emissions must peak by 2015 to avoid

irreversible climate change.”-- “World CO2 atmospheric concentrations must not

exceed 450 ppm.”• Peaking of world fossil fuels & CO2 emissions ~ 2017

will meet IPCC targets without legislative mandates• Fossil fuel peaking will limit CO2 atmospheric

concentration to ~ 430 ppm – well below climate change models forecasts

• Geologic resource constraints will impact sooner & more severely than legislative GHG control actions

• Geologic constraints supersede legislative actions in controlling future CO2 emissions

Page 32: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

32

FURTHER IMPLICATIONSFURTHER IMPLICATIONS

• World GDP can continue to increase in real terms ~ 2.1%/yr. without increasing carbon emissions

• Two caveats• First, world economic growth beyond 2017 requires vast

new energy supplies to replace declining fossil fuels• Ensuring these supplies will require massive efforts

beginning at least a decade in advance of fossil fuel peaking – e.g. now

• Second, world population forecast to increase from current 6.7 billion to ~ 9 billion in 2050

• Thus, to improve living standards, an economic growth rate > the “carbon neutral” rate of ~ 2.1%/yr. required

Page 33: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

33

REAL PROBLEM WE FACEREAL PROBLEM WE FACE

• Real energy problem world faces is peaking and then decline of fossil fuel production

• Economic growth & energy requirements closely correlated

• Major problem for most of world is achieving economic growth to reduce poverty

• This will require vastly increased energy supplies for the foreseeable future

• Most energy available will be fossil and nuclear• Failure to achieve economic growth will hurt poor nations

and poor people the most• Most nations not ready to go on strict energy diet• This may supersede global warming concerns

Page 34: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

34

POPULATION GROWTH TRENDSPOPULATION GROWTH TRENDS

8.2

7.6

6.8

6.1

5.3

4.4

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

Wor

ld P

opul

atio

n in

Bill

ions

Current U.S. population: ~ 300MU.S. population in 2040: ~ 400M

Page 35: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

35

CURRENT ECONOMIC GROWTH FORECASTCURRENT ECONOMIC GROWTH FORECAST

154

129

88

4634

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

Trill

ion

Dol

lars

of G

DP

World GDP in Trillion 2000 Dollars

In 20 years, worldGDP will double

Page 36: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

36

DEMAND FOR ENERGY: THE RISING TIDEDEMAND FOR ENERGY: THE RISING TIDE

78 85 99 107 110 131

205

262301

404

489

570

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

U.S Rest of the World

Note: 1.6 billion people currently do not have electricity.

Qua

drill

ion

Btu

Con

sum

ed

.

In 20 years, world energyconsumption will increase 80%

Page 37: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

37

U.N.: ACCESS TO ABUNDANT ENERGY U.N.: ACCESS TO ABUNDANT ENERGY IS KEY TO QUALITY OF LIFEIS KEY TO QUALITY OF LIFE

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000

Electricity Use

Hum

an D

evel

opm

ent I

ndex

Canada

Qatar

SwedenFinland

United States

UAE

MozambiqueZambia

ZimbabweBangladesh

Ethiopia

South Africa

Malaysia

Argentina

Italy

IndiaMorocco

ChinaBrazil

Indonesia

Electricity Use Per Capita and the U.N. Human Development Index

Source: International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2005.

Page 38: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

38

IndiaChina

Mexico

RussiaSouth Korea

Australia

USA

UKItaly

Malaysia

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

GDP per Capita (in US$)

Kilo

wat

t-hou

rs p

er C

apita

Mexico

Russia

South Korea USA

Italy

IndiaChina

AustraliaUK

Malaysia

0

150

300

450

600

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

GDP per Capita (in US$)

Pass

enge

r Veh

icle

s pe

r 1,0

00 P

eopl

e

Electricity Usage per Capita Passenger Vehicles per Capita

MOST NATIONS STILL AT EARLY STAGES OF MOST NATIONS STILL AT EARLY STAGES OF MODERNIZATION MODERNIZATION –– AND ENERGY USEAND ENERGY USE

Projections assume Chinese consumption remains below current levelsin Mexico for next 25 years

Page 39: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

39

CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

• Data on fossil fuel resources, reserves, availability, & production potential incomplete, of poor quality, & often unavailable

• Data deficiencies for NG & coal more serious than for oil• World fossil fuel production & CO2 emissions will peak ~ 2017• CO2 atmospheric concentration peaks ~ 2042 @ < 450 ppm• Fossil fuel peaking with achieve IPCC CO2 reduction goals

without legislation• Geologic constraints supersede legislative actions in

controlling future CO2 emissions• Real energy problem world faces is peaking and then

decline of fossil fuel production • The challenge is developing the vastly increased energy

supplies world requires in coming decades

Page 40: IMPLICATIONS OF FOSSIL FUELS PRODUCTION PEAKING FOR … · 2009. 2. 24. · Energy Watch Group (research organization) 2006 S. Husseini, (retired ... CONSUMPTION THROUGH 2020. 0 20

40

RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS

• Research required to improve data on fossil fuel resources, reserves, availability, & production potential

• Research priority should be on data deficiencies for NG & coal

• Further research required on relationship between fossil fuel production limitations and CO2 emissions

• Research should concentrate on post-2017 energy, CO2 , and economic issues and interrelationships

• Credible, comprehensive study required by objective organization independent of IPCC – perhaps the U.S. or Canadian National Research Council


Recommended