+ All Categories
Home > Education > Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Date post: 18-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: tanya-golash-boza
View: 1,069 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Future Faculty Hiring Initiative Tanya Golash-Boza Associate Professor of Sociology UC Merced @tanyaboza
Transcript
Page 1: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Future Faculty Hiring Initiative

Tanya Golash-BozaAssociate Professor of Sociology

UC Merced@tanyaboza

Page 2: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Why is diversity at UC Merced important?

Page 3: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring
Page 4: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

UC Diversity Statement

Diversity is a defining feature of the University of California and we embrace it as a source of strength. Our differences — of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, socioeconomic status, abilities, experience and more — enhance our ability to achieve the university’s core missions of public service, teaching and research. We welcome faculty, staff and students from all backgrounds and want everyone at UC to feel respected and valued.

Page 5: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Diversity leads to more…• Creativity• Innovation• Problem-solving• Advances in knowledge

Page 6: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

What are your goals?

• What are some ways that diversity makes your program better or unique?

• How do you think diversity could make a positive contribution to your department?

• When it comes to diversity, what are your program’s goals?

Page 7: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring
Page 8: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring
Page 9: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Women faculty at UC Merced

Lecturers Asst Profs Assoc Profs Full Profs0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Page 10: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

UC Merced Fall 2015 Students

Undergraduate Graduate

African Amer-ican5%

Asian24%

Hispanic48%

White13%

Other10%

African American3%

Asian33%

Hispanic12%

White43%

Other9%

Page 11: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Professor Associate Assistant Lecturers0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Percentage of faculty who are under-represented minorities at UCM

Page 12: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Latino/a faculty at UC Merced?Latino/as at UC Merced• 11.7% of lecturers• 12.2% of Assistant Profs• 8.9% of Associate Profs• 8.9% of Full Profs

– 48.5% of Undergraduate students at UC Merced are Latino/a

UC Berkeley• 5.5% of faculty are Latino/a,

compared to 17% of students.

Page 13: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Black Faculty at UC Merced?

• 4 lecturers• 3 Assistant Professors• 2 Associate Professors• 0 Full Professors

373 teaching faculty

Page 14: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Does faculty diversity matter?

• To UC Merced?• To your department?• To your students? • To you?

Page 15: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

• Now, let’s discuss what prevents us from hiring faculty who are representative of our student body.

Page 16: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Implicit Bias

• “We all like to think that we are objective scholars who judge people solely on their credentials and achievements, but copious research shows that every one of us has a lifetime of experience and cultural history that shapes the review process.” (Fine & Handelsman, 2006).

Page 17: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Are tall people more qualified?

• In the U.S. population, about 14.5 % of men are six feet tall or more. Among CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, that number is 58 %.

Page 18: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Are Emily and Brendan more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?

Page 19: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Are men more professional?

• A study of over 300 recommendation letters for medical faculty hired by a large U.S. medical school found that letters for female applicants differed systematically from those for males. Letters written for women were shorter, raised more doubts, portrayed women as students and teachers while portraying men as researchers and professionals (Trix & Psneka, 2003).

Page 20: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Implicit bias

• We all make judgments of others based on irrelevant criteria such as race, ethnicity, accent, gender, and sexual orientation – even when we try not to do this.

Page 21: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

How does implicit bias work in the academy?

• https://vimeo.com/160807787

Page 22: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

How might implicit bias affect your hiring practices – screening, interviewing?

Page 23: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

Institutional bias

• In 1978 Barbara Christian becomes the first Black woman to be granted tenure at the University of California, Berkeley.

• Berkeley was founded in 1868

2% of all full professors at very-high-activity research universities are black.

Page 24: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

This is not (just) a crisis of supply

• There was a 43% increase in the number of black PhDs between 2000 and 2010, yet only a 1.3% increase in black faculty appointments at traditionally white institutions during that time.

• UC System: In 1995, 9.9% of hires were under-represented minorities. In 2004, 9.4% of hires were. In 2013, this declined to 9.0%.

Page 25: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

If we do nothing, UC Merced faculty will become LESS diverse

• A study of 689 searches at 3 large elite public universities revealed that 47% of under-represented faculty hires & 86% of hires of blacks had one of these features:– Job focused on diversity (i.e. AfAm Lit)– Target of opportunity– Racially diverse search committee

• Of these 689 Searches, the 511 that paid no attention to diversity only led to 3 hires of African Americans and 0 hires of Native Americans.

Page 26: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

What does work?

• Appoint a search committee that represents a diverse cross section of the faculty

• Broaden your search pools: Most fields have listservs, groups, and other resources that can help you identify or reach qualified underrepresented candidates

• Agree on evaluation criteria prior to reviewing candidate

• UC Merced is developing a Faculty Equity Advisor program, and FEAs help you conduct your searches

Page 27: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

What are we going to do about this?

• Faculty Equity Advisors– Help constitute Search Committees– Explain best practices to Search Committees– Advise on broader PhD pool availability– Help evaluate Contribution to Diversity

Statements– Ensure that candidate pools match broader PhD

pool

Page 28: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

What are we going to do about this?

• Administrative support– Additional funds to advertise in spaces where we

are likely to find candidates who can make contributions to diversity.

– Additional funds to bring candidates to campus if the short list is diverse.

– Target of excellence hiring initiatives.• UC President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program

Page 29: Implicit and Institutional bias in Faculty Hiring

What are your ideas for moving

forward?


Recommended