+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Important Dates - jan.ucc.nau.edu

Important Dates - jan.ucc.nau.edu

Date post: 17-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
Important Dates Last 3 papers due are from blue book November 16 Exam 3 (chapters 8, 9, 10). Reading assignment on close relationships is due November 23: Term paper due, reading assignment on prosocial behavior due, last day to turn in extra credit. December 7: Reading assignment on Intergroup Conict and Prejudice is due. December 14 FINAL EXAM 8:30 AM!!
Transcript

Important Dates

Last 3 papers due are from blue book

November 16 Exam 3 (chapters 8, 9, 10). Reading assignment on close relationships is due

November 23: Term paper due, reading assignment on prosocial behavior due, last day to turn in extra credit.

December 7: Reading assignment on Intergroup Conflict and Prejudice is due.

December 14 FINAL EXAM 8:30 AM!!

Chapter 9: Group Processes

Group

two or more people who are interacting with each other and are interdependent

Interdependent = to fulfill their needs and goals they must rely upon each other.

Why do we join groups?

Important to survival

Provide information

Help us define our identity

Establish social norms

Composition of Groups

most groups are 2-6 members

tend to be similar in age, sex, beliefs, opinions

people are attracted to similar others

groups operate in ways that encourage similarity among its members

Functions of Groups

Social Norms: shared expectations about how to behave, facilitate social interaction.

But, ...if you violate the norms there is pressure to conform....if not, rejection

Social Roles: also facilitate social interaction

But, costs = losing personal identity, or acting inconsistently with the role.

Functions (con’t)

Gender Roles

Group Cohesiveness

qualities of a group that bind members together and promote liking

helps people to stay in a group, participate in the group, may interfere with group decision making

Social Facilitation

Zajonc (1969) study with cockroaches...they ran faster through a maze when in the presence of other cockroaches!

“Mere presence of others” improves performance on simple, well-learned tasks, but hinders performance on complex tasks

Theory of Social Facilitation

Zajonc

Presence of others increases physiological arousal, which facilitates dominant, well-learned responses

Physiological arousal inhibits difficult tasks

Why?

Presence of others makes us more alert (can explain cockroach behavior too)

Concerns about evaluation (evaluation apprehension)

Distraction

Social LoafingWhen we are around others our individual efforts are less easily observed

Performance is impaired on simple tasks but enhanced on complex ones when individual performance cannot be evaluated

Focus on the first example

Tendency to loaf is stronger in men and in individualistic cultures (more emphasis on individualistic behavior)

Deindividuation

Exercise

The feeling of anonymity

Loosening of normal constraints on behavior

Increase in impulsive and deviant acts

examples

Uniforms, costumes, masks...hides identity

mob behavior, reduced likelihood of being singled out

whether behavior is positive or negative depends on group norms

Group Decision Making

Process Loss

When group interactions inhibits good problem solving

Groupthink

Groupthink

when group cohesiveness and solidarity interrupts good decision making

Occurs when

group is highly cohesive, isolated from contrary opinions, ruled by a directive leader, using poor decision-making procedures in high stress situations

Symptoms of GroupthinkIllusion of invulnerability

Belief in moral correctness of the group

Stereotyped views of the outgroup

Self-censorship

Direct pressure on dissenters

Mindguards (keep opposing views out)

Illusion of unanimity

How to avoid

Leaders need to strive to be impartial

Solicit outside (unpopular) information

Use of subgroups

Secret ballots

film

11:00 and 7:30 on channel 37

Group Polarization

Called “risky shift” in earlier research

groups make more extreme decisions that individuals’ initial judgments

Persuasive arguments interpretation

Social comparison interpretation

Social Dilemmas

Conflicts in which the most beneficial action for an individual will, if chosen by most people, will have harmful effects on everyone.

Prisoner’s Dilemma

Try it!

People must decide to independently decide whether to cooperate or compete, when participants don’t trust each other, leads to poor outcomes for both. This can lead to an escalation of conflict

Other kinds of dilemmas Public goods dilemma

individuals must contribute to a common pool in order to maintain the public good (taxes, blood supply)

Commons dilemma (tragedy of the commons)

everyone takes from a common pool of good that will replenish itself if used in moderation (water, energy)


Recommended